"Best" PEEP during one-lung ventilation

Eight patients were studied under general anaesthesia for elective pulmonary lobectomy to see if intrinsic positive end-expired pressure (PEEPi) would appear or increase in the dependent lung during one-lung ventilation (OLV) or if application of external PEEP equal to individually measured PEEPi would produce better arterial oxygenation, haemodynamic state and oxygen delivery than either zero PEEP (ZEEP) or an external PEEP 5 cm H2O greater than PEEPi. Patients were non-obese, without obstructive airways disease, aged 53-76 yr and ASA < III. They received standardized anaesthesia with fentanyl, 50% nitrous oxide in oxygen and isoflurane; monitoring included radial and fibreoptic pulmonary arterial catheters and intermittent positive pressure ventilation with a tidal volume of 8 ml kg-1, 16 bpm, and an I:E ratio of 1:2. PEEPi was measured during two-lung ventilation (TLV) and OLV, using rapid airway occlusion at end-expiration. There was no PEEPi during TLV, but 2-6 mm Hg of PEEPi appeared during OLV. Applying external PEEP equal to individually measured PEEPi reduced venous admixture and increased PaO2 without a decrease in cardiac index (thus increasing oxygen delivery) compared with ZEEP, but the improvement in pulmonary gas exchange was lost and an additional penalty of reduced cardiac output was imposed when external PEEP was increased to 5 mm Hg above PEEPi.      

The effect of positive end-expiratory pressure and continuous positive airway pressure on the oxygenation and shunt fraction during one-lung ventilation with propofol anesthesia.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on the oxygenation and shunt fraction during one-lung ventilation (OLV). DESIGN: Prospective clinical study. SETTING: Inpatient thoracic surgery and anesthesia clinic at an University hospital. PATIENTS: 15 patients with esophageal cancer who were scheduled for radical surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Arterial oxygenation, shunt fraction, and hemodynamics were evaluated at 20 min after the start of operation, at 20 minutes after the initiation of OLV under zero end-expiratory pressure (ZEEP), 20 minutes after the application of 4 cm PEEP to the dependent lung, at 20 minutes after OLV under ZEEP, 20 minutes after the application of 4 cm CPAP to the nondependent lung, and again under ZEEP, and after the combined application of PEEP and CPAP to the dependent and nondependent lungs. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There were no significant changes in mean pulmonary artery pressure, mean arterial blood pressure, heart rate, mixed venous partial pressure of oxygen, or arterial and mixed venous saturation of oxygen (SVO(2)) during this study. Arterial partial pressure of oxygen (pO(2)) increased and shunt fraction values decreased significantly after the application of PEEP (pO(2); 197.8 +/- 32.9 mmHg, Qs/Qt; 22.9 +/- 5.6%), CPAP (pO(2); 212.6 +/- 15.9 mmHg, Qs/Qt; 22.8 +/- 5.9%), and combination of PEEP and CPAP (pO(2); 222.0 +/- 42.8 mmHg, Qs/Qt; 24.1 +/- 6.4%) compared with ZEEP (pO(2); 128.1 +/- 37.5 mmHg, Qs/Qt; 33.2 +/- 6.8% ). But there were no significant differences regarding oxygenation and shunt fraction during PEEP, CPAP, or the combination of PEEP and CPAP. CONCLUSIONS: The application of PEEP to the dependent lung, CPAP to the nondependent lung, and the combination of PEEP and CPAP, are useful for improving oxygenation and decreasing Qs/Qt.     

Relation of the Static Compliance Curve and Positive End-expiratory Pressure to Oxygenation during One-lung Ventilation

Background : Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is commonly applied to the ventilated lung to try to improve oxygenation during one-lung ventilation but is an unreliable therapy and occasionally causes arterial oxygen partial pressure (Pao2) to decrease further. The current study examined whether the effects of PEEP on oxygenation depend on the static compliance curve of the lung to which it is applied.

Methods : Forty-two adults undergoing thoracic surgery were studied during stable, open-chest, one-lung ventilation. Arterial blood gasses were measured during two-lung ventilation and one-lung ventilation before, during, and after the application of 5 cm H2O PEEP to the ventilated lung. The plateau end-expiratory pressure and static compliance curve of the ventilated lung were measured with and without applied PEEP, and the lower inflection point was determined from the compliance curve.

Results : Mean (+/- SD) Pao2 values, with a fraction of inspired oxygen of 1.0, were not different during one-lung ventilation before (192 +/- 91 mmHg), during (190 +/- 90), or after ( 205 +/- 79) the addition of 5 cm H2O PEEP. The mean plateau end-expiratory pressure increased from 4.2 to 6.8 cm H2O with the application of 5 cm H2O PEEP and decreased to 4.5 cm H2O when 5 cm H2O PEEP was removed. Six patients showed a clinically useful (> 20%) increase in Pao2 with 5 cm H2O PEEP, and nine patients had a greater than 20% decrease in Pao2. The change in Pao2 with the application of 5 cm H2O PEEP correlated in an inverse fashion with the change in the gradient between the end-expiratory pressure and the pressure at the lower inflection point (r = 0.76). The subgroup of patients with a Pao2 during two-lung ventilation that was less than the mean (365 mmHg) and an end-expiratory pressure during one-lung ventilation without applied PEEP less than the mean were more likely to have an increase in Pao2 when 5 cm H2O PEEP was applied.     

The Influence of Ventilation Mode (Spontaneous Ventilation,IPPV and PEEP) on Cardiopulmonary Parameters in Sevoflurane Anaesthetized Dogs

The purpose of this study was to investigate the cardiopulmonary influences of sevoflurane in oxygen at two anaesthetic concentrations (1.5 and 2 MAC) during spontaneous and controlled ventilation in dogs. After premedication with fentanyl–droperidol (5 μg/kg and 0.25 mg/kg intramuscularly) and induction with propofol (6 mg/kg intravenously) six dogs were anaesthetized for 3 h. Three types of ventilation were compared: spontaneous ventilation (SpV), intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV), and positive end expiratory pressure ventilation (PEEP, 5 cm H₂O). Heart rate, haemoglobin oxygen saturation, arterial blood pressures, right atrial and pulmonary arterial pressures, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and cardiac output were measured. End tidal CO₂%, inspiratory oxygen fraction, respiration rate and tidal volume were recorded using a multi‐gas analyser and a respirometer. Acid–base and blood gas analyses were performed. Cardiac index, stroke volume, stroke index, systemic and pulmonary vascular resistance, left and right ventricular stroke work index were calculated. Increasing the MAC value during sevoflurane anaesthesia with spontaneous ventilation induced a marked cardiopulmonary depression; on the other hand, heart rate increased significantly, but the increases were not clinically relevant. The influences of artificial respiration on cardiopulmonary parameters during 1.5 MAC sevoflurane anaesthesia were minimal. In contrast, PEEP ventilation during 2 MAC concentration had more pronounced negative influences, especially on right cardiac parameters. In conclusion, at 1.5 MAC, a surgical anaesthesia level, sevoflurane can be used safely in healthy dogs during spontaneous and controlled ventilation (IPPV and PEEP of 5 cm H₂O).     

Positive end-expiratory pressure applied to the dependent lung during one-lung ventilation improves oxygenation and respiratory mechanics in patients with high FEV1

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to test the efficacy of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) to the dependent lung during one-lung ventilation, taking into consideration underlying lung function in order to select responders to PEEP. METHODS: Forty-six patients undergoing open-chest thoracic surgical procedures were studied in an operating room of a university hospital. Patients were randomized to receive zero end-expiratory pressure (ZEEP) or 10 cmH2O of PEEP to the dependent lung during one-lung ventilation in lateral decubitus. The patients were stratified according to preoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) as an indicator of lung function (below or above 72%). Oxygenation was measured in the supine position, in the lateral decubitus with an open chest, and after 20 min of ZEEP or PEEP. The respiratory system pressure-volume curve of the dependent hemithorax was measured in supine and open-chest lateral decubitus positions with a super-syringe. RESULTS: Application of 10 cmH2O of PEEP resulted in a significant increase in PaO2 (P < 0.05). This did not occur in ZEEP group, considered as a time matched control. PEEP improved oxygenation only in patients with high FEV1 (from 11.6+/-4.8 to 15.3+/-7.1 kPa, P < 0.05). There was no significant change in the low FEV1 group. Dependent hemithorax compliance decreased in lateral decubitus, more in patients with high FEV1 (P < 0.05). PEEP improved compliance to a greater extent in patients with high FEV1 (from 33.6+/-3.6 to 48.4+/-3.9 mLcmH2O(-1), P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: During one-lung ventilation in lateral decubitus, PEEP applied to the dependent lung significantly improves oxygenation and respiratory mechanics in patients with rather normal lungs as assessed by high FEV1.     

Prospective,randomized, controlled evaluation of the preventive effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on patient oxygenation during one-lung ventilation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This prospective, randomized, controlled study evaluated the effects on oxygenation by applying a selective and patient-specific value of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) to the dependent lung during one-lung ventilation. METHODS: Fifty patients undergoing thoracic surgery under combined epidural/general anaesthesia were randomly allocated to receive zero PEEP (Group ZEEP, n = 22), or the preventive application of PEEP, optimized on the best thoracopulmonary compliance (Group PEEP, n = 28). Patients' lungs were mechanically ventilated with the same setting during two- and one-lung ventilation (FiO2 = 0.5; VT = 9mL kg(-1), inspiratory :expiratory time = 1 : 1, inspiratory pause = 10%). RESULTS: Lung-chest wall compliance decreased in both groups during one-lung ventilation, but patients of Group PEEP had 10% higher values than patients with no end-expiratory pressure (ZEEP) applied--Group ZEEP (P < 0.05). During closed chest one-lung ventilation, the PaO2 : FiO2 ratio was lower in Group PEEP (232 +/- 88) than in Group ZEEP (339 +/- 97) (P < 0.05); but no further differences were reported throughout the study. No differences were reported between the two groups in the need for 100% oxygen ventilation (10 patients of Group ZEEP (45%) and 14 patients of Group PEEP (50%) (P = 0.78)) or re-inflation of the operated lung during surgery (two patients of Group ZEEP (9%) and three patients of Group PEEP (10%) (P = 0.78)). Postanaesthesia care unit discharge required 48 min (25th-75th percentiles: 32-58 min) in Group PEEP and 45 min (30-57 min) in Group ZEEP (P = 0.60). CONCLUSIONS: The selective application of PEEP to the dependent, non-operated lung increases the lung-chest wall compliance during one-lung ventilation, but does not improve patient oxygenation.     

Relation of the static compliance curve and positive end-expiratory pressure to oxygenation during one-lung ventilation.

BACKGROUND: Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is commonly applied to the ventilated lung to try to improve oxygenation during one-lung ventilation but is an unreliable therapy and occasionally causes arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO(2)) to decrease further. The current study examined whether the effects of PEEP on oxygenation depend on the static compliance curve of the lung to which it is applied. METHODS: Forty-two adults undergoing thoracic surgery were studied during stable, open-chest, one-lung ventilation. Arterial blood gases were measured during two-lung ventilation and one-lung ventilation before, during, and after the application of 5 cm H(2)O PEEP to the ventilated lung. The plateau end-expiratory pressure and static compliance curve of the ventilated lung were measured with and without applied PEEP, and the lower inflection point was determined from the compliance curve. RESULTS: Mean (+/- SD) PaO(2) values, with a fraction of inspired oxygen of 1.0, were not different during one-lung ventilation before (192 +/- 91 mmHg), during (190 +/- 90), or after ( 205 +/- 79) the addition of 5 cm H(2)O PEEP. The mean plateau end-expiratory pressure increased from 4.2 to 6.8 cm H(2)O with the application of 5 cm H(2)O PEEP and decreased to 4.5 cm H(2)O when 5 cm H(2)O PEEP was removed. Six patients showed a clinically useful (> 20%) increase in PaO(2) with 5 cm H(2)O PEEP, and nine patients had a greater than 20% decrease in PaO(2). The change in PaO(2) with the application of 5 cm H(2)O PEEP correlated in an inverse fashion with the change in the gradient between the end-expiratory pressure and the pressure at the lower inflection point (r = 0.76). The subgroup of patients with a PaO(2) during two-lung ventilation that was less than the mean (365 mmHg) and an end-expiratory pressure during one-lung ventilation without applied PEEP less than the mean were more likely to have an increase in PaO(2) when 5 cm H(2)O PEEP was applied. CONCLUSIONS: The effects of the application of external 5 cm H(2)O PEEP on oxygenation during one-lung ventilation correspond to individual changes in the relation between the plateau end-expiratory pressure and the inflection point of the static compliance curve. When the application of PEEP causes the end-expiratory pressure to increase from a low level toward the inflection point, oxygenation is likely to improve. Conversely, if the addition of PEEP causes an increased inflation of the ventilated lung that raises the equilibrium end-expiratory pressure beyond the inflection point, oxygenation is likely to deteriorate.     

A comparison of pressure- and volume-controlled ventilation at different inspiratory to expiratory ratios*

Background: Inverse ratio ventilation (IRV) is frequently used in severe acute respiratory failure. IRV may lead to intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and is thought to improve oxygenation and to have advantageous effects on lung mechanics. Published data to support the use of IRV are scarce. This animal study compares external PEEP with intrinsic PEEP in pressure- and volume-controlled ventilation. Methods: Fifteen pigs were randomly treated with 1. volume-controlled PEEP ventilation (I:E ratio 1:2) (VCV PEEP), 2. volume-controlled ventilation (I:E ratio 4:1) (VCIRV) and 3. pressure-controlled ventilation (I:E ratio 4:1) (PCIRV). Baseline measurements were performed using volume-controlled ventilation (I:E ratio 1:2) (VCV ZEEP). Lung mechanics, haemo-dynamics and gas exchange were measured by standard methods and functional residual capacity (FRC) by the sulphur hexafluoride technique. Results: In comparison to VCV PEEP, PCIRV resulted in reduced peak airway pressure (32±3 vs. 27±6 cm H₂O, P < 0.001) and increased mean airway pressure (14±2 vs. 22±5 cm H₂O, P < 0.001). FRC was 942±264 ml in VCV PEEP and 1024±390 ml in PCIRV (n.s.). Oxygen delivery was lower in PCIRV (458±193 vs. 346±150 ml/min, P < 0.05). Physiologic dead space was 14±4% in PCIRV and 20±6% in VCV PEEP and VCIRV (P < 0.005). Conclusions: Inverse ratio ventilation did not result in improved FRC in comparison to conventional volume-controlled PEEP ventilation. PCIRV allows for a reduction in minute ventilation but the increase in mean airway pressure compromises circulation.     

Effect of PEEP on regional ventilation during laparoscopic surgery monitored by electrical impedance tomography

Background: Anesthesia per se and pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic surgery lead to atelectasis and impairment of oxygenation. We hypothesized that a ventilation with positive end‐expiratory pressure (PEEP) during general anesthesia and laparoscopic surgery leads to a more homogeneous ventilation distribution as determined by electrical impedance tomography (EIT). Furthermore, we supposed that PEEP ventilation in lung‐healthy patients would improve the parameters of oxygenation and respiratory compliance. Methods: Thirty‐two patients scheduled to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly assigned to be ventilated with ZEEP (0 cmH₂O) or with PEEP (10 cmH₂O) and a subsequent recruitment maneuver. Differences in regional ventilation were analyzed by the EIT‐based center‐of‐ventilation index (COV), which quantifies the distribution of ventilation and indicates ventilation shifts. Results: Higher amount of ventilation was examined in the dorsal parts of the lungs in the PEEP group. Throughout the application of PEEP, a lower shift of ventilation was found, whereas after the induction of anesthesia, a remarkable ventral shift of ventilation in ZEEP‐ventilated patients (COV: ZEEP, 40.6 ± 2.4%; PEEP, 46.5 ± 3.5%; P<0.001) was observed. Compared with the PEEP group, ZEEP caused a ventral misalignment of ventilation during pneumoperitoneum (COV: ZEEP, 41.6 ± 2.4%; PEEP, 44 ± 2.7%; P=0.013). Throughout the study, there were significant differences in the parameters of oxygenation and respiratory compliance with improved values in PEEP‐ventilated patients. Conclusion: The effect of anesthesia, pneumoperitoneum, and different PEEP levels can be evaluated by EIT‐based COV monitoring. An initial recruitment maneuver and a PEEP of 10 cmH₂O preserved homogeneous regional ventilation during laparoscopic surgery in most, but not all, patients and improved oxygenation and respiratory compliance.     

Selective PEEP in Acute Bilateral Lung Disease. Effect on Patients in the Lateral Posture

Seven patients with acute respiratory failure due to diffuse and fairly uniform lung disease were studied during mechanical ventilation in the lateral decubital position with: (a) zero end-expiratory pressure (ZEEP) through a double-lumen oro-bronchial tube to permit a recording of the ventilation to each lung; (b) bilateral positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 1.2 kPa, with maintenance of ventilation distribution between lungs as observed during ZEEP; (c) selective PEEP of 1.2 kPa, applied to the dependent lung only, with ventilation as during ZEEP; and (d) conventional PEEP of 1.2 kPa applied to both lungs through a single-lumen tube, with free distribution of ventilation between the lungs. During ZEEP, 69% of ventilation was distributed to the non-dependent and 31% to the dependent lung; cardiac output was 6.51 X min-1, venous admixture (QS/QT) 40% and arterial oxygen tension (PaO2) 8.3 kPa. With bilateral PEEP, functional residual capacity (FRC) increased by 0.331, cardiac output was reduced to 5.11 X min-1 and venous admixture to 32%. PaO2 increased to 10.1 kPa. With selective PEEP the dependent lung FRC increased by 0.211 and the FRC of the non-dependent lung decreased by 0.081. Cardiac output increased to 6.11 X min-1, which was no longer significantly different from that during ZEEP. Venous admixture remained at the same level as with bilateral PEEP.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Positional hypoxaemia following post-traumatic pulmonary insufficiency.

The effect of body position on ventilatory function was evaluated in a patient with unilateral lung disease. The patient's pulmonary dynamics were examined in the supine, right, and left decubitus positions under conditions of positive pressure ventilation with zero end-expiratory pressure (ZEEP) and 5 cm H2O (0.9 KPa) positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP). When the patient was positioned so that the "diseased" lung was dependent, there was a marked decrease in PaO2 and increase in venous admixture when compared to the values in the supine position. These changes were relatively greater in the ZEEP, than the PEEP situation. When the "diseased* lung was not dependent, there was an increase in PaO2 and a decrease in venous admixture. This was most pronounced when PEEP was applied. Changes in body position may result in clinically significant alterations in pulmonary gas exchange, especially in patients with pre-existing pulmonary dysfunction.     

Techniques de ventilation artificielle sur un seul poumon en cours de thoracotomie

Different means of limiting the fall in arterial Po₂ produced by single lung artificial ventilation were studied in 60 patients during thoracotomy. Changing from ventilating both lungs to the one healthy lung in the lateral recumbent position, without modifying tidal volume and frequency, brought about a fall in arterial Po₂ from 180±56 to 67±40 mmHg. The alveolar to arterial oxygen gradient increased to 110±45 mmHg (the alveolar oxygen pressure being calculated). Reducing the tidal volume so as to keep the inflation pressure at its initial level did not improve the arterial Po₂ but slightly increased the arterial Pco₂ (2.3 mmHg). The use of 6 to 8 cm H₂O positive end-expiratory pressure did not significantly modify the arterial Po₂ or Pco₂. Increasing the inspired oxygen fraction from 0.5 to 0.7 increased the arterial Po₂ from 100±89 mmHg to 165±59 mmHg, whilst the alveolar to arterial oxygen gradient increased to 118±60 mmHg. Clamping the pulmonary artery increased the arterial Po₂ and dual lung ventilation restored it to its initial value. Therefore, the only effective means of increasing oxygenation was to increase the inspired oxygen fraction. Unilateral continuous positive airway pressure was not used so as not to impair surgery. Dual lung ventilation may be necessary if the arterial Po₂ remains low.     

Effect of positive end-expiratory pressure on inflammatory response in oleic acid-induced lung injury and whole-lung lavage-induced lung injury

Purpose The present study investigated the effects of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on the inflammatory response in two different lung injury models: edematous lung induced by oleic acid (OA); and atelectatic lung induced by whole-lung lavage (LAV). Methods Japanese white rabbits (n = 28) were allocated to one of the two lung injury (OA or LAV) groups, and each group was treated with intermittent positive pressure ventilation, using zero end-expiratory pressure (ZEEP) or PEEP (1 cm H₂O above the lower inflection point [LIP]). Thus, the animals were divided into LAV-ZEEP, LAV-PEEP, OA-ZEEP, and OA-PEEP groups. Blood and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) were sampled 3 h after ventilatory treatment to analyze interleukin (IL)-8 levels. Results Pa_{O 2} was significantly decreased after the induction of lung injury, but was significantly higher in the PEEP groups compared to the ZEEP groups for each lung injury. Serum IL-8 levels were elevated in both experimental models. Serum IL-8 levels were significantly lower in LAV-PEEP than in LAV-ZEEP, whereas no difference was noted between OA-PEEP and OA-ZEEP. BALF IL-8 levels were lower in LAV-PEEP than in LAV-ZEEP. PEEP above LIP attenuated the elevation of IL-8 in BALF and serum in atelectatic lungs, but did not attenuate these increases in the edematous lungs. Conclusion These results suggest that the protective effects of PEEP on injured lungs may depend on the underlying lung pathology.     

Haemodynamic effects of pressure support and PEEP ventilation by nasal route in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND--Intermittent positive pressure ventilation applied through a nasal mask has been shown to be useful in the treatment of chronic respiratory insufficiency. Pressure support ventilation is an assisted mode of ventilation which is being increasingly used. Invasive ventilation with intermittent positive pressure, with or without positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP), has been found to affect venous return and cardiac output. This study evaluated the acute haemodynamic support ventilation by nasal mask, with and without the application of PEEP, in patients with severe stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and hypercapnia. METHODS--Nine patients with severe stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease performed sessions lasting 10 minutes each of pressure support ventilation by nasal mask while undergoing right heart catheterisation for clinical evaluation. In random order, four sessions of nasal pressure support ventilation were applied consisting of: (1) peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) 10 cm H2O, PEEP 0 cm H2O; (2) PIP 10 cm H2O, PEEP 5 cm H2O; (3) PIP 20 cm H2O, PEEP 0 cm H2O; (4) PIP 20 cm H2O, PEEP 5 cm H2O. RESULTS--Significant increases in arterial oxygen tension (Pao2) and saturation (Sao2) and significant reductions in arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO2) and changes in pH were observed with a PIP of 20 cm H2O. Statistical analysis showed that the addition of 5 cm H2O PEEP did not further improve arterial blood gas tensions. Comparison of baseline values with measurements performed after 10 minutes of each session of ventilation showed that all modes of ventilation except PIP 10 cm H2O without PEEP induced a small but significant increase in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure. In comparison with baseline values, a significant decrease in cardiac output and oxygen delivery was induced only by the addition of PEEP to both levels of PIP. CONCLUSIONS--In patients with severe stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and hypercapnia, pressure support ventilation with the addition of PEEP delivered by nasal mask may have short term acute haemodynamic effects in reducing oxygen delivery in spite of adequate levels of SaO2.     

Alveolar recruitment strategy and PEEP improve oxygenation,dynamic compliance of respiratory system and end‐expiratory lung volume in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery for congenital heart disease

Objective: Optimizing alveolar recruitment by alveolar recruitment strategy (ARS) and maintaining lung volume with adequate positive end‐expiratory pressure (PEEP) allow preventing ventilator‐induced lung injury (VILI). Knowing that PEEP has its most beneficial effects when dynamic compliance of respiratory system (Crs) is maximized, we hypothesize that the use of 8 cm H₂O PEEP with ARS results in an increase in Crs and end‐expiratory lung volume (EELV) compared to 8 cm H₂O PEEP without ARS and to zero PEEP in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery for congenital heart disease. Methods: Twenty consecutive children were studied. Three different ventilation strategies were applied to each patient in the following order: 0 cm H₂O PEEP, 8 cm H₂O PEEP without an ARS, and 8 cm H₂O PEEP with a standardized ARS. At the end of each ventilation strategy, Crs, EELV, and arterial blood gases were measured. Results: EELV, Crs, and P_aO₂/FiO₂ ratio changed significantly (P < 0.001) with the application of 8 cm H2O + ARS. Mean P_aCO₂– PETCO₂ difference between 0 PEEP and 8 cm H2O PEEP + ARS was also significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion: An alveolar recruitment strategy with relative high PEEP significantly improves Crs, oxygenation, P_aCO₂– PETCO₂ difference, and EELV in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery for congenital heart disease.     

利用动态肺顺应性设定呼气末正压在胸腔镜肺叶切除术中的运用

目的 探讨单肺通气利用动态肺顺应性设定呼气末正压通气(positive end-expiratory pressure,PEEP)的优势及可行性. 方法 选择预行右侧肺叶切除患者80例,完全随机分为A组和B组,每组40例:A组,单肺通气实施肺膨胀(sustained inflation,SI)复张后加用20 cmH2O(1 cmH2O=0.098 kPa)的PEEP并递减滴定,随后以得到最大肺顺应性的PEEP值通气,直到恢复双肺通气;B组,通气PEEP值固定为5 cmH2O,其他通气方法同A组.记录患者血气、呼吸等参数. 结果 两组设定的PEEP值[A组(9.2±1.2) cmH2O,B组5 cmH2O]差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05);在单肺通气1 h(T3)、手术结束(T4)时,两组动脉血氧分压(partial pressure of oxygen,PaO2)比较,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05);B组的PaO2在T3～T4逐步降低,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05),而A组则维持较好(P＞0.05);T3、T4时刻A组的动态肺顺应性[(30.8±5.9)、(30.7±6.4) ml/cmH2O]与B组[(26.6±5.5)、(26.4±5.2) ml/cmH2O]比较,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05). 结论 胸腔镜肺叶切除术中的单肺通气,利用动态肺顺应性设定的PEEP值通气能够得到更好的氧合及呼吸参数,并且维持较好.     

Spontaneously breathing anesthetized patients with a laryngeal mask airway

Spontaneous ventilation is a popular mode of ventilation for patients with the laryngeal mask airway (LMA). Studies have shown, however, that spontaneous ventilation impairs gas exchange and that assisting or controlling ventilation results in higher oxygen saturation. Atelectasis during general anesthesia is a well described mechanism which impacts on gas exchange. Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) increases the lung volume available for gas exchange. This study investigated whether the application of PEEP leads to an improvement of oxygen saturation in unassisted spontaneously breathing patients with a LMA. A total of 80 adult patients under general anesthesia were prospectively randomized into two groups. Both groups were left to breathe spontaneously. In group 1 the adjustable pressure limiting (APL) valve was opened resulting in zero end-expiratory pressure. In group 2 the valve was set to a PEEP of +7 cm H₂O. Oxygen saturation was measured by pulse oxymetry at four different phases: pre-induction, after induction and insertion of the LMA, during maintenance and in recovery. The application of PEEP did not improve oxygen saturation. In both groups the mean oxygen saturation was similar (97.2±1.8% in group 1 versus 97.2±1.9% in group 2, p=0.941) during maintenance. No effect on oxygen saturation in recovery could be found either (96.0±1.8% in group 1 versus 96.1±2.0% in group 2, p=0.952) and hemodynamics were unaffected by the application of PEEP. The application of a PEEP of +7 cm H₂O with a LMA under spontaneous ventilation cannot be recommended. Limitations of our study were the selection of healthy patients and omitting pre-oxygenation before induction which might have limited the development of atelectasis. In addition arterial partial pressure of oxygen (p_aO₂) measurements could have revealed subtle changes in oxygenation.     

Application of PEEP using the i-gel during volume-controlled ventilation in anesthetized, paralyzed patients

Purpose

This prospective, randomized trial was designed to assess whether the i-gel supraglottic airway device is suitable for volume-controlled ventilation while applying positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 5 cmH₂O under general anesthesia. It was believed that this device might improve arterial oxygenation.

Methods

Forty adult patients (aged 20–60 years) scheduled for elective orthopedic surgery were enrolled in this study. Twenty patients were ventilated without external PEEP [zero positive end-expiratory pressure (ZEEP) group], and the other 20 were ventilated with PEEP 5 cmH₂O (PEEP group) after placing an i-gel device. Volume-controlled ventilation at a tidal volume (TV) of 8 ml/kg of ideal body weight, leak volume, and arterial blood gas analysis were investigated.

Results

The incidences of a significant leak were similar in the ZEEP and PEEP groups (3/20 and 1/20, respectively; P = 0.605), as were leak volumes. No significant PaO₂ difference was observed between the two groups at 1 h after satisfactory i-gel insertion (215 ± 38 vs. 222 ± 54; P = 0.502).

Conclusions

The use of an i-gel during PEEP application at 5 cmH₂O did not increase the incidence of a significant air leak, and a PEEP of 5 cmH₂O failed to improve arterial oxygenation during controlled ventilation in healthy adult patients.     

'Alveolar recruitment strategy' improves arterial oxygenation during general anaesthesia

Abnormalities in gas exchange during general anaesthesia are caused partly by atelectasis. Inspiratory pressures of approximately 40 cm H2O are required to fully re-expand healthy but collapsed alveoli. However, without PEEP these re-expanded alveoli tend to collapse again. We hypothesized that an initial increase in pressure would open collapsed alveoli; if this inspiratory recruitment is combined with sufficient end-expiratory pressure, alveoli will remain open during general anaesthesia. We tested the effect of an 'alveolar recruitment strategy' on arterial oxygenation and lung mechanics in a prospective, controlled study of 30 ASA II or III patients aged more than 60 yr allocated to one of three groups. Group ZEEP received no PEEP. The second group received an initial control period without PEEP, and then PEEP 5 cm H2O was applied. The third group received an increase in PEEP and tidal volumes until a PEEP of 15 cm H2O and a tidal volume of 18 ml kg-1 or a peak inspiratory pressure of 40 cm H2O was reached. PEEP 5 cm H2O was then maintained. There was a significant increase in median PaO2 values obtained at baseline (20.4 kPa) and those obtained after the recruitment manoeuvre (24.4 kPa) at 40 min. This latter value was also significantly higher than PaO2 measured in the PEEP (16.2 kPa) and ZEEP (18.7 kPa) groups. Application of PEEP also had a significant effect on oxygenation; no such intra-group difference was observed in the ZEEP group. No complications occurred. We conclude that during general anaesthesia, the alveolar recruitment strategy was an efficient way to improve arterial oxygenation.      

Effect of positive-end expiratory pressure on accuracy of thermal-dye measurements of lung water

The thermal-dye indicator dilution technique of measuring extravascular lung water (EVLW-_TD) correlates well with gravimetric measurement of lung water (EVLW-_GR) when no positive-end expiratory pressure (PEEP) is used in both normal and edematous lungs. PEEP is often used to raise arterial oxygen tension in acute respiratory failure. This study was designed to answer the question: Does PEEP have an effect on the accuracy of the EVLW measurement by thermal dye? Sixteen mongrel dogs were anesthetized and intubated. Arterial and PA catheters were placed. They were divided into three groups and ventilated at PEEP levels of 5, 10, or 15 cm H₂O. Fluids were given to minimize decrease in cardiac output with institution of PEEP. They were maintained for 5 hr with measurement of vital signs made hourly and measurement of blood gases and EVLW-TD made at baseline, 1, 3, and 5 hr. After final measurements, gravimetric determination of EVLW was done. Correlation between EVLW_TD and EVLW_GR remained good when low levels of PEEP were used. At 5 cm H₂O PEEP, EVLW_TD was 7.5 ± 0.9 and EVLW_GR was 5.4 ± .3. At 10 cm H₂O PEEP, they were 10.0 ± 0.9 and 6.5 ± 0.3. The correlations were 0.87 and 0.97, respectively. However, at 15 cm H₂O PEEP, EVLW_TD was 11.4 ± 1.3 and EVLW_GR was 7.5 ± 0.6, with a correlation of only 0.59. The correlation between the two techniques seems to break down with higher levels of PEEP in dogs with normal lungs.