丙戊酸钠与卡马西平治疗躁狂发作临床观察

目的：评价丙戊酸钠与卡马西平对锂盐治疗无效的躁狂发作的疗效和副反应。方法：将符合CCMD－2－R躁狂发作诊断标准的5例患者随机分为丙戊酸钠组和卡马西平组,治疗6周。使用Bech-Rafaelsen躁狂量表及临床疗效总评量表的疗效总评评定疗效,用副反应量表及有关实验室检查评定副反应。结果：丙戊酸钠与卡马西平均能有效减轻躁狂症状,疗效相近,丙戊酸钠起效时间迟于卡马西平。丙戊酸钠的副反应主要为肠道反应、震颤等、而卡马西平以共济失调、头晕、嗜睡等多见。结论：丙戊酸钠与卡马西平均可用于锂盐治疗无效的躁狂发作。     

Serum carnitine levels during oxcarbazepine and carbamazepine monotherapies in children with epilepsy

Prolonged antiepilepsy drug treatment can result in secondary carnitine deficiency. The effect of oxcarbazepine on carnitine metabolism has not been reported previously. In this study, serum concentrations of total and free carnitine were measured in 20 children with epilepsy treated with oxcarbazepine monotherapy and were compared with 20 children with epilepsy who were taking carbamazepine as monotherapy. The assays were performed between 3 and 6 months of anticonvulsant treatment. The mean values of serum total and free carnitine levels in patients receiving carbamazepine monotherapy were 63.0 +/- 20.7 micromol/L and 49.1 +/- 16.7 micromol/L, respectively. The mean values of serum total and free carnitine levels in patients receiving oxcarbazepine monotherapy were 64.2 +/- 17.4 micromol/L and 50.3 +/- 13.7 micromol/L, respectively. The values were all between normal ranges. No significant difference was observed in the level of total and free carnitine levels between the two groups. Our results suggest that neither oxcarbazepine nor carbamazepine as monotherapy causes carnitine deficiency in otherwise healthy children with primary idiopathic epilepsy.     

Carbamazepine, a possible adjunct or alternative to lithium in bipolar disorder

The effect of carbamazepine in bipolar disorder has been studied by several groups. According to these studies carbamazepine appears to exert a "lithium-like" effect. Twelve patients with lithium-resistant bipolar disorder and without epilepsy were prophylactically treated for 3 years with carbamazepine in an open study. In most patients carbamazepine was added to lithium, neuroleptics and/or antidepressants. Four patients did not complete the minimum treatment period of 6 months required for evaluation. In the remaining eight patients carbamazepine seemed to be effective in four patients, had a possible or slight effect in two, and no effect in the remaining two. It is concluded that carbamazepine can be safely combined with lithium, and that carbamazepine, eventually combined with lithium, can be effective in lithium(-alone)-resistant bipolar disorder.     

A comparison of monotherapy with lamotrigine or carbamazepine in patients with newly diagnosed partial epilepsy.

Monotherapy with lamotrigine or carbamazepine was evaluated in a multicentre open trial of patients aged 2 years and above with newly diagnosed partial epilepsy. A total of 417 patients were randomised to treatment with lamotrigine, while 201 patients received carbamazepine. Following a dose escalation period of 6 weeks, maintenance therapy (Weeks 7-24) was adjusted according to response. Efficacy was similar with both treatments (65% with lamotrigine, 73% with carbamazepine, P=0.085). Efficacy was assessed by the proportion of patients seizure free during the last 16 weeks of treatment; all subjects who remained in the study for at least 18 weeks after the week 4 visit were included in the analysis. More patients receiving lamotrigine completed the study (81%), compared with those receiving carbamazepine (77%). This difference was primarily due to discontinuation as a result of adverse events, reported by 34 (8%) of those treated with lamotrigine but 26 (13%) of those treated with carbamazepine. The proportion of patients who experienced adverse events in the lamotrigine group was lower (218 patients, 52%) compared with the carbamazepine group (120 patients, 60%). The proportion of patients with adverse events considered to be drug related was lower in the lamotrigine group (132 patients, 32%) compared with the carbamazepine group (83 patients, 41%). Somnolence was the only adverse event reported at an incidence of greater than 5% and where there was a difference of 5% or more between treatment groups (4% lamotrigine, 11% carbamazepine patients). The small subsets of elderly patients (aged 65 years or over) and paediatric patients (aged 2-12 years) also showed better tolerability to lamotrigine than to carbamazepine. In conclusion, monotherapy with lamotrigine is as effective as carbamazepine in patients with newly diagnosed partial epilepsy. Patients were able to tolerate lamotrigine better than carbamazepine, so more patients receiving lamotrigine were able to remain on therapy.     

Concentration-effect relationships with carbamazepine and its epoxide on psychomotor and cognitive function in epileptic patients.

A battery of psychometric tests was administered to 85 patients with epilepsy, of whom 26 were untreated, 40 received carbamazepine monotherapy and 19 took carbamazepine with another anticonvulsant. Carbamazepine alone had little effect on performance, but carbamazepine polypharmacy produced significant impairment. Increasing concentrations of carbamazepine (four tests) and its active metabolite, carbamazepine 10,11 epoxide (seven tests), correlated with decreasing performance in the monotherapy patients.     

Carbamazepine as an adjunct of antipsychotic therapy

The effect of low-dose haloperidol combined with the anticonvulsant carbamazepine was investigated in a 5-week placebo-controlled, double-blind study in acute schizophrenic patients. Weekly ratings showed a clinically pronounced and statistically significant improvement in both the carbamazepine and placebo groups. However, the patients on carbamazepine needed less neuroleptic and anticholinergic medication and experienced fewer side effects compared to the patients on placebo. Moreover, patients in the carbamazepine group showed a clear deterioration after discontinuation of carbamazepine (but maintenance of neuroleptic medication), while the placebo group did not change after discontinuation of placebo. Concomitant treatment with carbamazepine in psychotic patients may help to reduce neuroleptic dosages and unwanted side effects.     

Carbamazepine-viloxazine interaction in patients with epilepsy.

In six depressed epileptic patients stabilised on carbamazepine therapy, addition of the antidepressant agent viloxazine (300 mg/day for three weeks) induced a marked (average 55%) increase in steady-state plasma carbamazepine concentration. The concentration of the active metabolite carbamazepine-10,11-epoxide also increased during viloxazine therapy, but to a lesser extent (16%). In three patients, these effects were associated with symptoms of carbamazepine intoxication, which regressed rapidly when plasma carbamazepine and carbamazepine-10,11-epoxide levels returned to baseline values after discontinuation of viloxazine. In a seventh patient, viloxazine had to be discontinued after only two weeks because of severe side effects associated with a striking elevation of carbamazepine and carbamazepine 10,11-epoxide levels (by 197% and 137% respectively). Although viloxazine appears to be one of the few antidepressants which can be used safely in patients with epilepsy these results indicate that the drug should be prescribed with great caution in subjects treated with carbamazepine. The mechanism of the interaction probably involves inhibition of the metabolism of both carbamazepine and its active epoxide metabolite.     

Water intoxication in epileptic patients receiving carbamazepine.

Plasma sodium and osmolality were determined in 80 adult epileptic patients receiving chronic treatment with carbamazepine and in 50 control patients treated with other anticonvulsant drugs. Mean plasma osmolality was significantly lower in the carbamazepine-treated patients but mean plasma sodium did not differ in the two groups. Hyponatraemia was found in five of the carbamazine-treated patients and hypo-osmolality in six. None of the control patients had hyponatraemia and only one had a borderline low osmolality. Three of the 13 patients receiving carbamazepine alone were hyponatraemic. Plasma sodium concentration correlated negatively with both daily carbamazepine dose and serum carbamazepine level. Free water clearance after an oral water load was determined in six patients on carbamazepine alone and in six normal subjects not receiving drug therapy. The capacity of some of the patients to excrete the water load was found to be grossly impaired.     

Carbamazepine versus lithium in the prophylaxis of bipolar affective disorder.

A 12-month double-blind trial of carbamazepine vs lithium, given as sole treatment for the prophylaxis of bipolar affective disorder, was carried out in 31 patients. All were previously stable on lithium; 15 were switched over to carbamazepine and 16 remained on lithium. Although the overall relapse rate was similar in the 2 groups (6 on carbamazepine, 8 on lithium), nearly all the relapses in carbamazepine occurred in the first month, probably precipitated by lithium withdrawal. Two patients on carbamazepine developed a rash and were withdrawn. More side effects were noted during the early stages on carbamazepine. Patients on lithium tended to gain weight (+4 kg) compared with carbamazepine (-3.1 kg). It is concluded that carbamazepine is as effective as lithium in the prophylaxis of bipolar affective disorder; changeover from lithium to carbamazepine should be done slowly.     

The interaction of denzimol (a new anticonvulsant) with carbamazepine and phenytoin.

Denzimol, a new anticonvulsant drug, is currently undergoing clinical evaluation. In this paper we report its use in six patients who were also taking carbamazepine and two patients taking phenytoin. There was a striking elevation of serum carbamazepine, carbamazepine-10, 11 epoxide and phenytoin concentrations in all patients on the addition of denzimol therapy. The interaction with carbamazepine is greater in severity than any other reported to date and denzimol's interaction with both carbamazepine and phenytoin is likely to prove of major clinical significance.     

Carbamazepine versus sulthiame in treating benign childhood epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes

We compared the therapeutic efficacy of carbamazepine versus sulthiame in patients with benign childhood epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes. Drug efficacy was evaluated only in those patients who initiated treatment with any drug after at least three seizures. Thirty-eight patients who received carbamazepine and 18 patients who received sulthiame were included in the analysis. Cessation of seizures was observed in 73.6% of the former and in 66.7% of the latter (P = not significant). Five of eight patients who were switched to sulthiame after failing carbamazepine became seizure free, whereas none of the three patients who failed sulthiame became seizure free after being switched to carbamazepine. The rate of drug discontinuation owing to adverse reaction was 15% in carbamazepine and 14.3% in sulthiame. Normalization of interictal epileptiform activity on electroencephalography was seen more often following treatment with sulthiame (71%) than with carbamazepine (42%) (P = not significant). No significant differences between these two medications were found in the treatment of benign childhood epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes in this small patient sample.     

Low-dose therapy with carbamazepine for convulsions associated with mild gastroenteritis

We investigated the effect of carbamazepine on convulsions associated with mild gastroenteritis. Sixteen infants and young children (aged 9 months to 3 years) who experienced repetitive convulsions associated with mild gastroenteritis were admitted to our hospital. We treated the sixteen affected patients with 5 mg/kg of carbamazepine once per day until the diarrhea had stopped. Thirteen of the sixteen patients were subjected to intravenous and/or suppository administration of diazepam (0.3-0.5 mg/kg/time), and one patient suppository administration of 0.5 mg/kg diazepam and 5.7 mg/kg phenobarbital before the administration of carbamazepine. In all patients who were given diazepam and/or phenobarbital, the convulsions recurred after the administration of these medicines. The convulsions occurred 2 to 8 times (mean, 4.1 times) before the administration of carbamazepine. Fifteen of the sixteen patients had no seizures after the administration of carbamazepine. One patient had one convulsion 15 min after the administration of carbamazepine. All patients were treated with 5 mg/kg of carbamazepine once per day until the diarrhea had stopped, i.e. for 2 to 9 days (mean, 6.4 days). Low dose therapy with carbamazepine once per day is thus effective for convulsions associated with mild gastroenteritis.     

Carbamazepine toxicity during combination therapy with levetiracetam: a pharmacodynamic interaction

Levetiracetam is a novel antiepileptic drug with an unknown mechanism of action. To-date levetiracetam is not known to be associated with any clinically significant pharmacokinetic interaction. Similarly, levetiracetam has not been associated with any pharmacodynamic interactions. We present four patients with severe refractory epilepsy in whom introduction of levetiracetam led to disabling symptoms compatible with carbamazepine toxicity requiring either carbamazepine dose reduction or levetiracetam withdrawal. As carbamazepine and carbamazepine-epoxide blood levels were not altered during levetiracetam co-medication, a pharmacodynamic interaction is suggested. Therefore, during levetiracetam co-medication with carbamazepine, patients should be monitored closely for symptoms of carbamazepine toxicity.     

Carbamazepine and hyponatremia in patients with affective disorder

The authors assessed 20 carbamazepine-treated patients for the development of hyponatremia. None of the patients had readings below 135 meg/liter of sodium before carbamazepine therapy, but five (25%) did have such readings after carbamazepine therapy. Three of these patients developed frank symptoms of hyponatremia within 1-3 months of the start of therapy. In one patient, hyponatremia developed after rechallenge with carbamazepine. The authors suggest that caution be used in prescribing carbamazepine to patients with low or borderline low sodium values.     

Thrombocytopenia associated with carbamazepine: a case series.

Carbamazepine is increasingly being used in the acute and maintenance treatment of patients with bipolar disorder. Thrombocytopenia represents a serious adverse effect of carbamazepine with which clinicians need to be familiar. The authors describe the course of thrombocytopenia associated with carbamazepine in four patients with bipolar disorder. In all cases, thrombocytopenia appeared 14 to 16 days after the initiation of carbamazepine; also in all cases the platelet count completely recovered within 7 days after the carbamazepine treatment was discontinued. Thrombocytopenia secondary to carbamazepine appears soon after the initiation of treatment and is rapidly followed by recovery after drug discontinuation.     

Total and free serum concentrations of carbamazepine and carbamazepine-10,11-epoxide in children with epilepsy

Simultaneous steady-state serum total and free (non-protein-bound) concentrations of carbamazepine and carbamazepine-10,11-epoxide were measured in 68 patients under the age of 21 years with epilepsy (44 males, 24 females; mean age, 11.8 +/- 4.5 years). Thirty patients were maintained on monotherapy with carbamazepine. Mean serum total carbamazepine and carbamazepine-10,11-epoxide concentrations obtained were 7.0 +/- 2.4 mg/L (29.5 +/- 10.0 mumol/L) and 1.5 +/- 0.6 mg/L (5.9 +/- 2.6 mumol/L), respectively. Mean serum-free carbamazepine and carbamazepine-10,11-epoxide concentrations obtained were 1.3 +/- 0.5 mg/L (5.7 +/- 2.1 mumol/L) and 0.5 +/- 0.3 mg/L (2.2 +/- 1.1 mumol/L), respectively. Binding of carbamazepine and carbamazepine-10,11-epoxide was 81% +/- 3% and 62% +/- 10%, respectively. There was no significant difference in binding between male and female patients or those maintained on monotherapy and polytherapy. Age correlated significantly with carbamazepine binding but not with carbamazepine-10,11-epoxide binding. Free concentrations of carbamazepine and carbamazepine-10,11-epoxide correlated significantly with total carbamazepine and total carbamazepine-10,11-epoxide concentrations, respectively, indicating that the binding capacities of both carbamazepine and carbamazepine-10,11-epoxide are constant at serum total carbamazepine concentrations within the quoted therapeutic range.     

A double-blind study of adjunctive carbamazepine versus placebo on excited states of schizophrenic and schizoaffective disorders

A multi-institutional double-blind study comparing the therapeutic effect of adjunctive carbamazepine and placebo with standard neuroleptic treatment was performed on 162 patients with DSM-III diagnosis of schizophrenic (n = 127) or schizoaffective disorders (n = 35) who had excited states or aggressive/violent behavior that responded unsatisfactorily to neuroleptic treatment. The patients participated in a 4-week trial of carbamazepine plus neuroleptics (n = 82) or placebo plus neuroleptics (n = 80). The sum of patients with marked and moderate improvement was modestly larger in the carbamazepine group (48 vs. 30%, P less than 0.05). There was no significant difference between the carbamazepine and placebo groups in the changes of total BPRS scores, although the carbamazepine group showed more improvement on the items suspiciousness, uncooperativeness and excitement. The results suggest that carbamazepine, when used in combination with neuroleptics, is a useful drug for the treatment of excited states of patients with schizophrenic and schizoaffective disorders.     

Verapamil-induced carbamazepine neurotoxicity. A report of two cases

Two patients with signs of carbamazepine neurotoxicity after combined treatment with verapamil showed complete recovery after discontinuation of the calcium entry blocker. Use of verapamil in combination with carbamazepine should either be avoided or prescribed only with appropriate adjustment of the carbamazepine dose (usually reduction of the carbamazepine dose by one half).     

Predicting outcome of initial treatment with carbamazepine in childhood focal epilepsy

We developed a model to predict the outcome of treatment with carbamazepine in children with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy of presumed temporal lobe origin, using data available at the time of diagnosis. Eligible children observed at The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia during 1999 were identified. Data were abstracted on four potential predictor variables for carbamazepine success or failure. A total of 149 patients completed an adequate first antiepileptic trial. Carbamazepine was the initial drug used in 129 (87%) patients. Forty-one of these 129 patients (32%) had persistent seizures. Significant predictors of initial carbamazepine failure were as follows: early risk factor for epilepsy (risk RATIO = 3.1 [95% confidence interval 1.6, 4.0]) and temporal lobe abnormality on magnetic resonance imaging scan (risk RATIO = 3.1 [1.7, 4.2]). The outcome of the initial carbamazepine trial was correctly classified in up to 78% of patients. Accurate prediction of initial carbamazepine failure was as high as 0.67 (0.53, 0.79). Accurate prediction of initial carbamazepine success was as high as 0.87 (0.77, 0.94). In this study, standard clinical data were less than adequate for predicting response to the initial trial of carbamazepine, with prediction of carbamazepine failure being particularly difficult. Better markers of antiepileptic response and nonresponse are required to guide optimal therapy in patients with epilepsy.     

Reversal by phenytoin of carbamazepine-induced water intoxication: a pharmacokinetic interaction.

The hypothesis that phenytoin may antagonise the antidiuretic effect of carbamazepine has been examined by comparing the free water clearance response to a standard water load in 36 patients stabilised on different drug regimes. The diuretic response to the water load was significantly greater in patients receiving chronic treatment with carbamazepine and phenytoin in combination than in matched control subjects receiving carbamazepine as a single drug. Acute administration of phenytoin (1,100 mg), however, had no significant influence on carbamazepine-induced antidiuresis. Evidence is presented that reversal of the antidiuretic effect of carbamazepine by chronic phenytoin administration is secondary to a marked reduction of the serum carbamazepine concentration during combined therapy. These results suggest that the risk of developing water intoxication is greater in patients receiving carbamazepine alone than in those receiving phenytoin in combination. Since the antidiuretic effect is correlated with the serum carbamazepine concentration rather than with the prescribed daily dose, monitoring the serum level of the drug is likely to provide the best rational approach to the prevention of excessive water retention.