仅行唇颊侧浸润麻醉拔除上颌牙镇痛效果分析

目的讨论拔除上颌恒牙时不给予腭侧麻醉的可行性。方法拔除双侧上颌恒牙的患者63例,进行双侧对照试验,试验组予4%盐酸阿替卡因（含1∶100000肾上腺素）1.7mL唇颊侧前庭沟浸润麻醉,5min后拔牙;对照组颊侧注射同前,同时腭侧追加上述局麻药0.4mL浸润麻醉,5min后拔牙。所有患者麻醉后和拔牙后分别完成注射及拔牙疼痛视觉模拟量表（visual analogue scale,VAS）和语言评价量表（verbal response scale,VRS）测试。结果注射疼痛评价VAS值试验组为（26.3±8.1）mm,对照组为（37.9±6.7）mm,二者差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）;拔牙疼痛评价VAS值试验组为（15.3±6.9）mm,对照组为（13.3±5.7）mm,两组差异无统计学意义（P〉0.05）,所有患者认为拔牙为“可接受”。结论上颌恒牙拔除行腭侧浸润麻醉给患者带来更多不适,仅行4%盐酸阿替卡因唇颊侧浸润麻醉拔牙的方法可行。     

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Lidocaine in Permanent Maxillary Teeth Removal Performed with Single Buccal Infiltration Versus Routine Buccal and Palatal Injection

Purpose

For many dental patients, palatal injection proves to be a very traumatic experience. Diverse methods have been suggested to reduce the discomfort of palatal injection. Nevertheless, the reliability of these methods is not obviously evident and they are not found to be universally effective. The desirable method to evade pain during palatal injection is just not to have one. Hence, the present study aims at investigating if lidocaine hydrochloride could provide palatal anesthesia in maxilla when only a buccal infiltration anesthesia is done for teeth extraction.

Patients and Methods

One hundred and fifty patients requiring extraction of maxillary teeth were included in the study. Patients were randomly allotted to two groups, study and control. Patients in study group received a single buccal infiltration of 1.5 mL of lidocaine with epinephrine for extraction of maxillary teeth. Patients in control group received 1.5 mL of buccal and 0.3 mL of palatal infiltration of lidocaine with epinephrine for the extraction. After achieving adequate palatal anesthesia the tooth was extracted with consistent technique. Pain level experienced by the patients during injection procedure and during tooth extraction was rated in an 11-point pain rating scale. Time taken to achieve palatal anesthesia following a single buccal infiltration of anesthetic solution was evaluated by regular pin-prick evaluation of palatal tissues.

Results

The overall success rate of palatal anesthesia achieved with a single buccal infiltration is 81.3 %. The success rate reduced as we proceed from anterior to posterior maxilla. Time taken to achieve successful palatal anesthesia by single buccal infiltration is 7–9 min.

Conclusion

The extraction of permanent maxillary anterior teeth and premolars is possible by depositing local anesthesia to the buccal vestibule of the tooth without palatal supplementation. However, the extraction of permanent maxillary posterior teeth with similar technique would result in fewer success rates suggesting its avoidance.     

阿替卡因麻醉下拔除上颌恒磨牙不施行腭侧注射麻醉的可行性

目的探讨拔除上颌恒磨牙时单用阿替卡因进行颊侧注射不施行腭侧注射的可行性。方法选择2007年5-7月在四川省人民医院口腔科就诊的104例需拔除上颌恒磨牙的患者为研究对象,38例患者为双侧上颌均有恒磨牙需要拔除,选择其中一侧作为试验牙,另一侧作为对照牙;两侧磨牙分2次拔除,间隔时间为7 d。66例患者为单侧上颌恒磨牙拔除,将需拔除牙作为试验牙,以前的拔牙经历作为对照。试验组由颊侧前庭沟注射点注入1.7 mL盐酸阿替卡因,对照组除颊侧注射外,在腭侧同时注射2%盐酸利多卡因0.25 mL。麻醉5 min后拔除患牙。由患者填写视觉模拟量表,对疼痛打分。结果试验组上颌恒磨牙麻醉成功率为96.2%,对照组上颌恒磨牙麻醉成功率为97.1%,二者之间的差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论在上颌恒磨牙的拔除中,阿替卡因颊侧注射麻醉后能达到较好的麻醉效果,可以不进行腭侧麻醉。     

仅用阿替卡因颊侧浸润麻醉拔除上颌第三磨牙的临床对照研究

目的：评价上颌第三磨牙拔除术中阿替卡因颊侧浸润注射对腭侧软组织的麻醉作用,讨论常规腭侧浸润麻醉注射是否必须。方法：28例拔除双侧上颌第三磨牙患者,每位患者作为其自身对照。对照侧利用盐酸阿替卡因行颊侧浸润麻醉及腭侧浸润麻醉,实验侧仅行颊侧浸润麻醉。注射3min后常规方法拔除患牙。利用100mm直观模拟标度尺（VAS）及问卷调查获得患者拔牙时的痛觉数据。结果：实验侧和对照侧的疼痛感觉（VAS值）没有显著性差异（P〉0．05）,拔牙过程中的疼痛均可接受。结论：仅用阿替卡因颊侧浸润麻醉可顺利拔除上颌第三磨牙,无需常规腭侧浸润麻醉,从而避免腭侧注射的疼痛不适。     

Infiltrative local anesthesia with articaine is equally as effective as inferior alveolar nerve block with lidocaine for the removal of erupted molars

Aim

The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 adrenaline given as buccal and lingual infiltration in adult patients undergoing erupted mandibular first and second molar teeth extraction versus inferior alveolar nerve block technique using 2% lignocaine with 1:80,000 adrenaline.

Materials and methods

A total of 100 patients undergoing extraction of mandibular posterior teeth were divided into two equally matched groups for the study, out of which 50 patients were given 4% articaine with 1:100,000 adrenaline as buccal and lingual infiltration and 50 patients were given 2% lignocaine with 1:80,000 adrenaline using classic direct inferior alveolar nerve block with lingual and buccal nerve block. Efficacy of anesthesia was determined using a numeric analog scale (NAS) ranging from 0 indicating no pain to 10 indicating the worst pain imaginable. The NAS was taken by a different operator to avoid bias.

Results

The pain scores in both groups were analyzed using the Mann–Whitney U test, and a p value of 0.338 was obtained which is not statistically significant. Hence, no significant difference in the pain score was established between both groups. The adverse effects of both the local anesthetics if any were noted.

Conclusion

From this study, we concluded that the use of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 adrenaline is as effective as inferior alveolar nerve block with lignocaine but without the risk of attendant adverse effects of inferior alveolar nerve block technique.

     

Comparison of the buccal injection versus buccal and palatal injection for extraction of permanent maxillary posterior teeth using 4% articaine: a split mouth study

In spite of the development of modern injection techniques, palatal injection is still a painful experience for patients. A plethora of techniques has been tested to reduce this. One such technique that has been claimed to work is administering articaine on the buccal side alone for the extraction of maxillary teeth due to its ability to diffuse through soft and hard tissues more reliably than other local anaesthetics. This split mouth study evaluated the efficacy of 4% articaine with 1:100000 adrenaline to avoid the painful palatal injection for bilateral permanent maxillary tooth extraction in 50 patients. The 100mm 10 point Visual Analog Scale/Wong Baker Facial Pain Scale was used to rate the amount of pain felt on injection, on probing the tissues prior to, or during, extraction, and one hour postoperatively. Although the buccal injection alone resulted in lower pain while injecting the anaesthetic, it did not result in the absence of pain before tooth extraction as has been suggested by various studies. A total of 74% patients required a palatal injection on the study side. We conclude that in most cases, when using a buccal injection alone, one cannot rely on the diffusion of articaine for effective palatal anaesthesia. Despite this, we suggest that as an initial option in young patients, the operator can consider avoiding the painful palatal injection by the use of articaine to prevent aversion to dental treatment. Postoperatively, the difference in pain levels was not statistically significant and no patient showed signs of lesions at the injection sites.     

Midline correction by asymmetric reciprocal torque: a pilot study

Objective

Can we correct dental midline discrepancies by systematic torque bends on all canines and premolars without extraction and mesiodistal tooth movement?

Patients and methods

Eight orthodontic patients (4?males, 4?females, mean age 31?years) presented a dental midline discrepancy of 2–4?mm, moderate deviation of the chin, no skeletal asymmetry, and a horizontal orientation of the occlusal plane in the frontal aspect. On the side where the mandible was shifted medially, asymmetric torque bends moved the antagonist canine and both premolar crowns buccally, while palatal crown torque was used on the maxillary canine and premolars on the other side. Lingual crown torque corrected the medially shifted canine and premolars in the mandibular dental arch, and buccal crown torque the laterally shifted lower canine and premolars.

Results

On average, torque effects altered the canine guidance by 6.5?±?4.7°, the first premolar guidance by 7?±?4.1°, and the second premolar guidance by 6.3?±?3.7°. Correction of the dental midline shift averaged 1.6?±?0.8?mm after the torque, and eliminated the midline discrepancy completely (n?=?2) or partly (n?=?6).

Conclusion

In this pilot study, asymmetric reciprocal torque represented a treatment option for midline corrections of approximately 2–4?mm and improvement in the chin position without mesiodistal tooth movement or extraction.     

“Sodium bicarbonate”: an adjunct to painless palatal anesthesia

Purpose

It is believed that whenever we inject local anesthesia into the palate it is a painful experience for the patients. The aim of this study was to make palatal anesthesia painless by adding 7.4% sodium bicarbonate as an adjunct in local anesthesia.

Methods

Fifty subjects requiring extraction of maxillary bilateral premolar teeth for orthodontic purpose free from periapical infections. These extractions were divided in such a way that all right-sided extractions were done under 2% lignocaine with 1:80,000 adrenaline; and all left-sided extractions were done under 2% lignocaine with 1:80,000 adrenaline with 7.4% sodium bicarbonate added. All extractions were performed using a consistent intra-alveolar technique by a single operator. Both the patient and the operator were blinded to the contents of the local anesthetic solution. Data records of these patients were procured on the basis of VAS and VRS, requirement of repeated injection, and onset and duration of anesthesia.

Results

Clinical and statistical data confirmed that the addition of sodium bicarbonate in local anesthetics reduces pain and decreased the onset and increased duration of local anesthesia in the palatal site, as compared to injection of local anesthetic without sodium bicarbonate.

Conclusion

Effect of sodium bicarbonate on reducing pain while injecting into the palatal aspect was noted in this study.

     

Comparison of the efficacy of 4% articaine with epinephrine 1:100,000 and 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:100,000 buccal infiltration for single maxillary molar extraction: a double-blind,randomised, clinical trial

The present study was designed to compare the efficiency of 4% articaine with epinephrine 1:100,000 and 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:100,000 in providing adequate anaesthesia for maxillary molar extraction with buccal infiltration only. In this randomised, double-blind clinical trial, 139 patients who needed maxillary molars extracting were enrolled. Individuals were randomly divided into two groups of 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:100,000 treated by buccal infiltration without palatal injection and 4% articaine with epinephrine 1:100,000 treated with the same method. Then, teeth were extracted and the pain assessed. During the extraction of teeth, 90.63% of patients in the lidocaine-treated group and 36% of patients in the articaine-treated group experienced pain (p<0.0001). In other words, the rates of successful anaesthesia with lidocaine and articaine buccal infiltration were 9.38% and 64%, respectively. Despite the better performance of articaine, it seems that some factors such as bone thickness and anatomical variations among individuals, besides the condition of the tooth, affects articaine’s level of efficiency in each case.     

Microanchor mediated upper molar intrusion in deep posterior bite after long-term edentulousness for prosthetic reconstruction with dental implants

Introduction

Long-term edentulousness can lead to elongation of antagonistic teeth, making prosthetic rehabilitation impossible. An interdisciplinary case is presented where elongated teeth were successfully intruded by micoranchor-mediated orthodontic movement.

Discussion

To the right mandible, implants had been inserted correspondingly to the alveolar process height. However, the patient waited over 1 year for prosthetic treatment. The antagonistic maxillary teeth had elongated considerably. On the left side, elongated upper molars occluded with previously crowned and in the meantime unprovided teeth 35 and 37. On the right side, two palatal, three vestibular microanchors of 8 mm length and 1.6 mm diameter were used, on the left side, two palatal and two vestibular microanchors to intrude the teeth 14 to 17 and 26. The screwheads were connected to individually model-casted splints for bodily intrusion of the molars.

Conclusion

This case illustrates how vertical tooth movements can be ventured by the use of orthodontic microscrews before either conventional or implant-borne prosthetic rehabilitation.     

Mechanical stress induces bone formation in the maxillary sinus in a short-term mouse model

Objectives

Clinicians occasionally face the challenge of moving a tooth through the maxillary sinus. The objective of this study was to evaluate tissue remodeling during tooth movement into the maxillary sinus, more specifically as regards to bone formation.

Materials and methods

The maxillary first molar of 20 male mice was moved toward the palatal side by a nickel–titanium super elastic wire for 1 to 14 days, and the bone remodeling around the root was evaluated using histomorphometry and immunodetection of bone-restricted Ifitm-like (Bril) protein, a novel marker of active bone formation.

Results

When mechanical stress was applied to the tooth, the periodontal ligament on the palatal side was immediately compressed to approximately half of its original width by the tipping movement of the tooth. At the same time, osteoblasts deposited new bone on the wall of the maxillary sinus prior to bone resorption by osteoclasts on the periodontal side, as evidenced by the high level of expression of Bril at this site. As a result of these sequential processes, bone on the sinus side maintained a consistent thickness during the entire observation period. No root resorption was observed.

Conclusions

Bone formation on the surface of the maxillary sinus was evoked by mechanotransduction of mechanical stress applied to a tooth over a 2-week period, and was induced ahead of bone resorption on the periodontal ligament side.

Clinical relevance

Mechanical stress can be exploited to induce bone formation in the maxillary sinus so that teeth can be moved into the sinus without losing bone or causing root damage.     

A blinded randomized controlled trial comparing lignocaine and placebo administration to the palate for removal of maxillary third molars

Routine use of a palatal injection for the removal of maxillary third molars has never been validated. The purpose of this blinded, randomized, controlled trial was to assess the requirement of a separate palatal injection for the extraction of maxillary third molars. Fifty-one patients requiring the removal of bilateral maxillary third molars were enrolled. Each patient acting as their own control received buccal infiltrations of lignocaine bilaterally, then 0.2 mL of lignocaine without vasoconstrictor was administered to one side of the palate and the same amount of normal saline administered to the other side. Sides were randomized as to the active ingredient and both the patient and operator were blinded. All extractions were performed by a single operator using a consistent technique and no additional sedative or anaesthetic agents were utilized. Data relating to the pain of the extractions and of the palatal injection were obtained on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Verbal Response Scale (VRS) data were obtained additionally for a subset of 21 patients. Statistical analysis confirmed clinical equivalence between saline and lignocaine to the palate (95% CI -1.7 to 6.2mm, equivalence range -6.75 to 6.75 mm). No patients requested additional lignocaine to the palate in order to ensure comfortable extraction. This study provides evidence that the poorly tolerated palatal injection of local anaesthetic for the removal of maxillary third molars may not be required.     

A Simple Technique for Removal of Broken Root Tip of Maxillary Premolars: A Technical Note

Introduction

Therapeutic extraction of maxillary premolars is often indicated for orthodontic treatment. Extraction as well as retrieval of broken root tips in cases should be minimally invasive aiming to preserve the alveolus as well as the buccal and palatal cortical plates.

Materials and methods

Here a technique is described that we have been employing for retrieving broken maxillary premolar root tips which have the bevel towards the buccal cortex.

Conclusion

The method is simple, atraumatic and effective.     

Comparison of onset and duration of action of soft tissue and pulpal anesthesia with three volumes of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine in maxillary infiltration anesthesia

Purpose

This randomized double-blind investigation was conducted to compare the onset and duration of action of soft tissue and pulpal anesthesia with three volumes of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine in maxillary infiltration anesthesia. The injection discomfort associated with three volumes of infiltration anesthesia was also assessed.

Materials and methods

A total of 10 subjects received 0.6?mL (group 1), 0.9?mL (group 2), and 1.2?mL (group 3) of the anesthetic buccal to the upper canine. Test teeth were assessed with electrical stimulation to determine onset and duration of pulpal anesthesia. Soft tissue anesthesia was assessed by pin-prick test, and injection discomfort was assessed using a visual analogue scale. The statistical analysis of the data recorded was carried out with one-way ANOVA and post-hoc tests.

Results

The 1.2-mL dose induced faster onset of pulpal anesthesia, a higher success rate, and a longer duration of soft tissue/pulpal anesthesia than was achieved with 0.6?mL (P?Conclusion Maxillary infiltration anesthesia with articaine and epinephrine has a faster onset, a greater success rate, and a longer duration when a volume of 1.2?mL is used than when volumes less than 1.0?mL are used. Palatal tissues were anesthetized with the highest concentration (1.2?mL) in our study (30% of cases).     

Comparison of Ropivacaine 0.75 % and Lignocaine 2 % with 1:200,000 Adrenaline in Dental Extractions: Single Blind Clinical Trial

Introduction

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, safety and clinical acceptability of the local anaesthetic agent ropivacaine 0.75 % in comparison with lignocaine 2 % with adrenaline 1:200,000 in minor oral surgical procedures.

Methods

Forty-seven patients, who required bilateral extractions in a single arch, were included in this study. One hundred and sixty-six extractions were performed and all the patients were administered nerve blocks/infiltration. Pre and postoperative pulse, blood pressure, random blood sugar, electrocardiogram and partial oxygen pressure were recorded at specified time intervals. Pain score by visual analogue scale, onset of action and depth of anesthesia were also observed. Duration of anaesthesia was assessed by feeling of numbness and first sign of pain.

Results

Statistical analysis revealed insignificant difference between both the groups in terms of pulse, blood pressure, random blood sugar, and partial oxygen pressure. The depth of anesthesia was evaluated by pain, comfort during the procedure with visual analog scale and showed no significant difference between the two groups. The onset of action for maxillary infiltration was 33.29 ± 9.2 (ropivacaine), 32.12 ± 6.8 s (2 % lignocaine with adrenaline 1:200,000) and for pterygomandibular nerve block was 181.0 ± 87.5 (ropivacaine), 32.12 ± 6.8 s (2 % lignocaine with adrenaline 1:200,000). Duration of anesthesia when compared was 411.7 ± 66.11 min (ropivacaine) and 107.87 ± 16.54 (2 % lignocaine with adrenaline 1:200,000). On maxillary buccal vestibule infiltration it was also observed that in ropivacaine group there was no requirement of palatal infiltration suggestive of good diffusion property.

Conclusion

Ropivacaine is a safe, clinically acceptable long acting local anaesthetic agent with added advantage of effective diffusion property.

Ethical Committee Approval Number

SDC/MISC/2013/239.

     

Anesthetic Efficacy of 4 % Articaine During Extraction of the Mandibular Posterior Teeth by Using Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block and Buccal Infiltration Techniques

Introduction

The study was designed to evaluate the anesthetic efficacy of 4 % articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine (A100) in infiltration and inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) anesthetic techniques for the pain control during extraction of the mandibular posterior teeth.

Methods

This prospective randomized single-blind clinical trial included 100 patients needing extraction of at least two mandibular molars. Patients received either infiltration in the buccal vestibule opposite to the first molar supplemented with lingual infiltration or standard IANB with A100. For assessment of depth of anesthesia obtained by the two anaethetic techniques, presence or absence of pain during the extraction were rated using the visual analog scale.

Results

Fifty patients received infiltration anesthesia and fifty patients were anesthetized by IANB. The success rate of pain-free extraction after buccal infiltration was 94 %, whereas by using IANB with the same anesthetic it was 92 %. No statistical differences were detected in the success rates between the two anesthetic techniques (P = 0.15).

Conclusions

Buccal Infiltration can be considered a good option during extraction of the mandibular molar and premolar teeth of course, with supplemental lingual anesthesia.

     

Orthodontic screws to extrude impacted maxillary canines

Objective

The impaction of maxillary canines is a frequently encountered clinical problem in orthodontic practice. Patients?? refusal to participate in long-term treatment or ankylosis of the impacted tooth result in various treatment difficulties. The aim of this study was to evaluate the possible role of mini-screws in the management of unerupted upper canines.

Patients and methods

In a series of 63 consecutive patients (27 males and 36 females, age range 14?C49?years, mean 22.7?years) with a total of 69 impacted maxillary canines, each impacted tooth was surgically exposed and an attachment bonded. An intraosseous screw with an endosseous body and intraoral neck section was inserted into the premolar?Cmolar interradicular space. Following soft tissue healing, orthodontic traction was initiated. After correction of the canine angulation, the mini-screw was removed and conventional orthodontic therapy completed.

Results

Of the 69?canines, 61 (88.41%) were extruded successfully. In the 7?cases that failed, skeletal anchorage spared both patients and clinicians the disappointment of customary long-term, unsuccessful orthodontic therapy. In one patient, the mini-screw was removed because of inflammation and pain before initiating orthodontic traction.

Conclusion

Our results demonstrate that mini-screw anchorage should be taken into consideration when extrusion of an impacted canine is planned.     

Mesiodistal tooth size in non-syndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate patients: a meta-analysis

Objectives

To evaluate, using meta-analysis methodology, mesiodistal tooth dimensions in non-syndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate (CLP) patients.

Materials and methods

A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Medline, Google Scholar Beta, EMBASE Excerpta Medica, CINAHL, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Collaboration, identifying English and non-English articles reporting on mesiodistal tooth dimensions on the cleft and non-cleft side of non-syndromic unilateral CLP patients. Additional studies were identified by searching reference lists of articles consulted. Only studies with a suitable control group were included. Two examiners independently performed the literature search and data extraction. Using meta-analysis software, data extracted from each selected study were statistically combined using the fixed-effects model. Weighted mean differences, 95 % confidence intervals, and heterogeneity were calculated for each measurement.

Results

Four articles fulfilling the inclusion criteria were located and included in the meta-analysis. Maxillary incisors and first molars were found to be significantly larger on the non-cleft side while mandibular incisors and premolars were larger on the cleft side, in non-syndromic unilateral CLP patients. On the cleft side, maxillary premolars and second molars were larger in cleft than control patients while incisors were smaller, whereas all mandibular teeth were larger in cleft patients. On the non-cleft side, all maxillary teeth except for the central incisors were larger in the cleft than control patients, while all mandibular teeth were larger in the cleft patients except for lateral incisors.

Conclusions

Non-syndromic unilateral CLP patients tend to have larger posterior but smaller anterior teeth compared with the general population. Comparing sides, unilateral CLP patients tend to have smaller maxillary but larger mandibular teeth on the cleft than on the non-cleft side.

Clinical relevance

Given that obtaining a stable, functional, and esthetic occlusion requires a thorough evaluation of tooth size, knowledge about trends in tooth size variations in CLP patients can help with dental and orthodontic treatment planning.     

Combating inadequate anesthesia in periapical infections,with sodium bicarbonate: a clinical double blind study

Introduction

Local anesthetics are generally much less effective when administered in inflamed tissues.

Purpose

This study was conducted to validate the addition of sodium bicarbonate in local anesthetics to increase its effectiveness as local infiltrations in teeth associated with periapical infections.

Methods

Two hundred subjects requiring extraction of maxillary teeth with periapical infections were enrolled. These subjects were divided in two groups of 100 subjects each. One group received local infiltration with 2 % lignocaine and 1:80,000 adrenaline, and the other group received local infiltration with sodium bicarbonate as an adjunct to the above mentioned local anesthetic solution. All extractions were performed using a consistent intra-alveolar technique by a single operator. Both the patient and the operator were blinded to the contents of local anesthetic solution. Data related to the onset of action of local anesthesia, pain experienced by the patient while undergoing extraction on two scales—"the visual analog scale and the verbal response scale", and any requirement of repeated injections during the procedure was recorded.

Results

Clinical and statistical data confirmed that the addition of sodium bicarbonate in local anesthetics did increase the efficacy of local anesthesia in inflamed tissues.

Conclusion

It has been observed in this study that the action of sodium bicarbonate in local anesthetics increases the pH levels of these solutions, thus possibly making them more effective in an acidic environment.     

Articaine and lignocaine efficiency in infiltration anaesthesia: a pilot study

AIM: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the onset of action of pulpal and soft tissue anaesthesia, and pain experience after buccal and palatal infiltrative injections with 4% articaine with 1:100,000 adrenaline, and 2% lignocaine with 1:100,000 adrenaline. METHOD: A double blind cross-over study was conducted with 20 healthy adult subjects who, in two appointments at least two weeks apart, randomly received an infiltration anaesthesia with the solutions in the buccal and palatal regions of the upper right canine. The tooth was tested with a pulp tester before (to establish its baseline response), and after the injection, until return to the base threshold level. The pain experience caused by palatal injection was verified by the visual analogue scale (VAS). Data were analysed using Wilcoxons test (alpha = 0.05). RESULTS: There were no significant statistical differences between the solutions with respect to VAS (p = 0.45), onset of action (p = 0.80) and pulpal (p = 0.08) and soft tissue (p = 0.18) anaesthesia duration, although pulpal anaesthesia may have reached statistical significance if a higher number of volunteers had been used. CONCLUSION: Under the conditions of this study it can be concluded that both anaesthetic solutions showed similar pain experience.