Total hip arthroplasty for posttraumatic arthritis after acetabular fracture

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) outcomes for posttraumatic arthritis after acetabular fracture have yielded inferior results compared to primary nontraumatic THA. Recently, improved results have been demonstrated using cementless acetabular reconstruction. Thirty-two patients underwent THA for posttraumatic arthritis after acetabular fracture; 24 were treated with open reduction internal fixation, and 8 were managed conservatively. Time from fracture to THA was 36 months (6-227 months). Average follow-up was 4.7 years (2.0-9.7 years). Harris Hip score increased from 28 (0-56) to 82 points (20-100). Six patients required revision. Five-year survival with revision, loosening, dislocation, or infection as an end point was 79%. Survival for aseptic acetabular loosening was 97%. Revision surgery correlated with nonanatomic restoration of the hip center and a history of infection (P < .05). Despite obvious challenges, advances in fracture management and cementless acetabular fixation in THA demonstrate improved results for posttraumatic arthritis following acetabular fracture.     

髋臼骨折的全髋关节置换术治疗

目的探讨全髋关节置换术（THA）治疗髋臼骨折的手术技术及近期疗效。方法1998年10月至2005年6月,本组采用THA治疗髋臼骨折合并创伤性髋关节骨关节炎患者27例28髋,其中13例初期采用切开复位内固定治疗,14例初期采用保守治疗。术前骨折分型（根据Letoumel—Judet分型系统）：后壁骨折（16例）,横行骨折（1例）,后柱＋后壁骨折（3例）,横行＋后壁骨折（4例）,T形骨折（1例）,双柱骨折（3例）。根据Harris髋关节评分系统分别对术前和术后疼痛程度、髋关节功能及活动度进行综合评分。结果随访资料完备者23例患者（24髋）,随访时间5—78个月,平均24．7个月。术前Harris髋关节评分21-76分,平均50．1分;术后评分56～100分,平均90．2分．较术前有显著性提高（P〈0．001）。其中18例优秀,4例良好,1例一般,1例较差。术前髋关节疼痛评分10—40分,平均24．6分;术后评分30—44分,平均41．1分。各有1例骨水泥型和非骨水泥型臼杯周围出现非连续性透亮带但未伴假体下沉或移位表现。术后未出现关节脱位、深部感染、严重异位骨化、医源性坐骨神经损伤或原有神经症状加重、下肢深静脉栓塞或肺栓塞等并发症。至最后一次随访尚无翻修患者。结论针对髋臼骨折合并创伤性髋关节骨关节炎患者施行THA,可有效缓解疼痛,改善髋关节功能及活动度且并发症少见。     

Total hip arthroplasty in acetabular fractures

Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) is a well-accepted treatment for established hip arthritis following acetabular fractures. If a conservatively managed or operated case progresses to non-union/mal-union failing to restore the joint integrity, it may eventually develop secondary arthritis warranting a total hip arthroplasty. Also, in recent years, acute total hip arthroplasty is gaining importance in conditions where the fracture presents with pre-existing hip arthritis, is not amenable to salvage by open reduction and internal fixation, or, a poor prognosis is anticipated following fixation.There are several surgical challenges in performing total hip arthroplasty for acetabular fractures whether acute or delayed. As a separate entity elderly patients pose a distinct challenge due to osteoporosis and need stable fixation for early weight bearing alleviating the risk of any thromboembolic event, pulmonary complications and decubitus ulcer. The aim of surgery is to restore the columns for acetabular component implantation rather than anatomic fixation. Meticulous preoperative planning with radiographs and Computed Tomography (CT) scans, adequate exposure to delineate the fracture pattern, and, availability of an array of all instruments and possible implants as backup are the key points for success. Previous implants if any should be removed only if they are in the way of cup implantation or infected. Press fit uncemented modern porous metal acetabular component with multiple screw options is the preferred implant for majority of cases. However, complex fractures may require major reconstruction with revision THA implants especially when a pelvic discontinuity is present.     

Midterm results of uncemented acetabular reconstruction for posttraumatic arthritis secondary to acetabular fracture

At an average of 6.3 years after surgery, we evaluated midterm results of uncemented acetabular reconstruction in 31 hips with posttraumatic arthritis that developed after acetabular fracture. Patients were categorized by previous fracture treatments (open-reduction group and conservative-treatment group) and fracture patterns (simple group and complex group). Surgery duration and blood loss were greater in the open-reduction and complex groups than in the conservative-treatment and simple groups (P < .05). The mean Harris Hip Score increased from 49 before surgery to 89 after surgery. Survival with revision or radiographic acetabular loosening as an end point was 100%. Fracture treatments and patterns were associated with increased surgery duration and increased blood loss. Open reduction and internal fixation of a fracture favor anatomical restoration of the hip's rotational center.     

Intermediate-term results after hybrid total hip arthroplasty for the treatment of dysplastic hips

BACKGROUND: In recent studies, good intermediate-term results have been reported after primary hybrid total hip arthroplasty (a cementless acetabular component with a cemented femoral stem) for the treatment of primary osteoarthritis. However, few studies have described the results of this technique in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip. METHODS: One hundred primary hybrid total hip replacements were performed in ninety patients to treat degenerative arthritis of the hip secondary to developmental dysplasia. Seventy-one patients (eighty-one hips) were available for clinical and radiographic evaluation. The average duration of follow-up was 10.6 years. There were ten men and sixty-one women. Seventy hips were classified as type 1 (dysplasia); seven, as type 2 (low dislocation); and four, as type 3 (high dislocation), according to the classification system of Hartofilakidis et al. RESULTS: At the time of the final follow-up, the average Harris hip score was 86 points. Structural autograft was used in fifteen hips to supplement acetabular coverage. Within five years postoperatively, the acetabular component in six of the fifteen hips had an average of 4.5 mm of vertical migration and an average increase in vertical rotation of 3 degrees, but the position appeared to stabilize thereafter. Revisions were performed in two hips because of recurrent dislocation. No acetabular or femoral component was revised because of aseptic loosening. Osteolysis was identified around two acetabular components and two femoral components. The average rate of polyethylene wear was 0.09 mm per year. CONCLUSIONS: Hybrid total hip arthroplasty for the treatment of symptomatic degenerative arthritis secondary to developmental dysplasia provides favorable results at intermediate-term follow-up. With lower grades of dysplasia, the majority of patients can be treated effectively without a structural bone graft by placement of the cementless acetabular component at a medial or high position.     

髋臼骨折内固定术后继发髋关节深部感染的全髋关节置换术

目的探讨全髋关节置换术（THA）治疗成人髋臼骨折术后继发髋部深部感染的近期临床疗效。方法回顾性分析2009年8月至2012年12月采用THA手术治疗8例成人髋臼骨折术后继发髋部深部感染的临床资料,男5例,女3例;年龄38-51岁,平均45岁。前柱骨折1例,后柱并后壁骨折4例,横行骨折2例,横行伴后壁骨折1例。术前行关节穿刺及术中取关节周围组织送细菌培养和药敏试验。手术取出内固定物,彻底清创,1例行一期THA手术,7例采取一期植入抗生素骨水泥间隔体,术后静脉滴注及口服抗生素,定期复查红细胞沉降率（ESR）、C反应蛋白（CRP）连续两次正常后,行二期THA手术。术后定期随访,常规复查ESR、CRP,摄髋关节正侧位X线片,采用Harris髋关节评分评估髋关节功能。结果所有患者均获得随访,随访时间14-55个月,平均29.5个月。一期与二期手术间隔时间5-15个月,平均8.5个月。Harris髋关节评分从术前平均（53.8±4.9）分,提高至末次随访时平均（92.3±5.3）分,差异有统计学意义（t=33.14,P〈0.01）。随访期间无1例发生假体周围感染、假体松动及脱位。结论对继发于髋臼骨折内固定手术的髋部感染,彻底清创及应用抗生素骨水泥间隔体可有效控制感染,骨小梁金属钽杯可提供有效的骨长入。     

老年移位髋臼骨折手术治疗策略及疗效

目的探讨切开复位内固定术和一期全髋关节置换术治疗老年髋臼骨折的临床疗效并进行比较研究。方法1998～2005年间共收治45位年龄超过60岁的髋臼骨折患者，其中21例行切开复位内固定，10例行一期全髋关节置换术。手术距受伤时间不到2周，平均7d。术后常规给予抗凝药预防深静脉血栓形成，按康复计划进行恢复性功能锻炼，定期随访行髋关节功能Harris评分。结果本组随访1．5～7年，平均4年；最后随访时，切开复位内固定组Harris评分为69～84分，平均79分，优良率为57％，伴有较高的创伤性关节炎、异位骨化、股骨头骨坏死发生率；全髋关节置换术组患者的Harris评分为75～90分，平均84分，优良率为80％，仅有髋臼杯轻度移动（〈4mm），无假体松动、深部感染等并发症。结论全髋关节置换术治疗老年移位髋臼骨折可以取得比切开复位内固定更好的稳定性，术后恢复快、功能质量高，并发症少，是一种较好的选择。     

Total hip arthroplasty in acetabular fractures

Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) is a well-accepted treatment for established hip arthritis following acetabular fractures. If a conservatively managed or operated case progresses to non-union/mal-union failing to restore the joint integrity, it may eventually develop secondary arthritis warranting a total hip arthroplasty. Also, in recent years, acute total hip arthroplasty is gaining importance in conditions where the fracture presents with pre-existing hip arthritis, is not amenable to salvage by open reduction and internal fixation, or, a poor prognosis is anticipated following fixation.There are several surgical challenges in performing total hip arthroplasty for acetabular fractures whether acute or delayed. As a separate entity elderly patients pose a distinct challenge due to osteoporosis and need stable fixation for early weight bearing alleviating the risk of any thromboembolic event, pulmonary complications and decubitus ulcer. The aim of surgery is to restore the columns for acetabular component implantation rather than anatomic fixation. Meticulous preoperative planning with radiographs and Computed Tomography (CT) scans, adequate exposure to delineate the fracture pattern, and, availability of an array of all instruments and possible implants as backup are the key points for success. Previous implants if any should be removed only if they are in the way of cup implantation or infected. Press fit uncemented modern porous metal acetabular component with multiple screw options is the preferred implant for majority of cases. However, complex fractures may require major reconstruction with revision THA implants especially when a pelvic discontinuity is present.     

同侧髋臼骨折合并股骨颈骨折行一期全髋关节置换术的临床研究

目的探讨同侧髋臼骨折合并股骨颈骨折行一期全髋关节置换（THA）的手术方法及其疗效。方法2003年7月至2006年3月,对5例同侧髋臼骨折合并股骨颈骨折的患者行一期THA,均采用生物型人工髋关节,强调髋臼重建结构的稳定性,随访21～54个月（平均34．4个月）;手术距受伤时间5～42d（平均18．6d）。3例2周内手术者,尽可能解剖复位内固定,2例超过4周手术者,在骨折畸形愈合的基础上,不剥离骨痂,给予结构性植骨并重塑髋臼。结果按HHS评分为87．6分,其中优2例,良2例,可1例,随访期间未发生感染、松动和异位骨化等并发症。结论对同侧髋臼骨折合并股骨颈骨折的患者行一期THA,能取得较好疗效,避免切开复位内固定引起的治疗周期长,高并发症,疗效差,甚至短期再次行THA等缺点;重视髋臼结构的稳定性和有翻修经验的医师参与是提高手术疗效的关键。     

Cementless acetabular fixation at fifteen years. A comparison with the same surgeon's results following acetabular fixation with cement

BACKGROUND: Loosening of the acetabular component is the major long-term problem associated with total hip arthroplasty with cement. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the minimum thirteen-year results associated with cementless acetabular components that had been inserted by a single surgeon and to compare them with the results associated with cemented acetabular components that had been inserted by the same surgeon. METHODS: One hundred and twenty consecutive, nonselected primary total hip replacements were performed in 108 patients with use of a Harris-Galante-I cementless acetabular component and a cemented femoral component with a 28-mm head. The patients were evaluated clinically with use of a standard terminology questionnaire, and they were evaluated radiographically for loosening, component migration, wear, and osteolysis. The rates of revision for aseptic loosening and radiographic evidence of loosening for this cohort were compared with the rates for four previously reviewed consecutive series of hips in which the acetabular component had been inserted with cement. All patients were managed by the same surgeon, were followed for thirteen to fifteen years, and were evaluated with use of the same two criteria (revision and loosening) as the end points for Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients (seventy-two hips) were living and forty-two patients (forty-eight hips) had died after thirteen to fifteen years of follow-up. No acetabular component had been revised because of aseptic loosening, and no acetabular component had migrated. With revision of the acetabular component for any reason as the end point, the survival rate was 81% +/- 8% at fifteen years. With revision of the acetabular component for clinical failure (osteolysis, wear, loosening, or dislocation) as the end point, the survival rate was 94% +/- 8% at fifteen years. Among the seventy hips with at least thirteen years of radiographic follow-up, five had pelvic osteolysis and three had had revision of a well-fixed acetabular component because of pelvic osteolysis secondary to polyethylene wear. The mean linear wear rate was 0.15 mm/yr (0.12 mm/yr when one outlier was excluded). CONCLUSIONS: In terms of fixation, Harris-Galante-I cementless acetabular components performed better than did cemented 22-mm-inner-diameter Charnley acetabular components as well as 28-mm-inner-diameter all-polyethylene and metal-backed acetabular components that had been inserted by the same surgeon. However, the rate of wear was greater in association with the Harris-Galante-I cementless components than it was in association with the Charnley cemented all-polyethylene components.     

Osteolysis in cemented versus cementless acetabular components

A prospective, randomized, double-blind, clinical trial comparing cemented with cementless total hip arthroplasty was performed to compare the prevalence and pattern of acetabular osteolysis. Both groups were similar before surgery. Acetabular components were metal-backed, titanium implants. Twenty-eight-millimeter modular femoral heads with titanium femoral stems were used. At a minimum 2-year and mean 4-year follow-up period (range, 2–6 years), 224 patients had clinical and radiographic data available. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of acetabular osteolysis between cemented (5%) and cementless (9%) fixation. With or without cement, the use of a titanium femoral head led to osteolysis within a relatively short period after surgery in almost all of the cases, although this was not significant. The pattern of acetabular osteolysis was different. Progressive osteolysis occurred predominantly in acetabular zone 1 in the cemented group and zone 2 in the cementless group. Cementless fixation of acetabular components has been advocated in an attempt to minimize osteolysis that may occur in cemented total hip arthroplasty. This study found no difference in the prevalence of acetabular osteolysis between the two groups.     

Revision of failed acetabular cups with extensive structural allografts

AIM: Structural allografts are used with encouraging results for revision of failed total hip arthroplasty and in the surgery of bone tumours. The aim of the present study is to describe the clinical and radiological results achieved with structural allografts in revision of a total hip arthroplasty. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 15 patients (12 female and 3 male patients) were revised with an acetabular defect situation of type 3 A or 3 B according to the Paprosky classification. Five fresh-frozen acetabula, nine distal femora and one proximal tibia were used for acetabular reconstruction. The rigid graft fixation was performed with 2 > or = AO screws. In one case a cemented acetabular ring was implanted, four cementless cups and ten cemented polyethylene acetabular components were used. The mean follow-up was 7.9 years (1.6-11.0 years). RESULTS: A stable osseointegration of fifteen transplanted structural allografts was achieved in thirteen cases. Two allografts (one aseptic loosening, one deep infection) failed to osseointegrate. In one case the migration of a cementless cup was registered. Revision surgery of this female patient was performed successfully with a cemented reconstruction ring. The mean Harris hip score at the latest follow-up was 81.4 points (70-99 points). CONCLUSION: For reconstruction of acetabular bone stock and restoration of the bone anatomy structural allografts can be recommended. The use of cementless cups in combination with structural grafts is to be evaluated as critical.     

全髋置换术中应用髋臼内壁环形截骨术治疗成人髋臼发育不良

目的评价全髋置换中应用髋臼内壁环形截骨固定非骨水泥髋臼杯治疗成人髋臼发育不良的疗效。方法对29例髋臼发育不良继发骨性关节炎患者(29髋)在全髋置换术中应用髋臼内壁环形截骨术。手术指征为术前X线髋臼覆盖率70%。非骨水泥髋臼杯全部安放在真臼位置,附加操作:软组织松解17髋,治疗性股骨截骨2髋,结构性植骨1髋,股骨短缩3髋。手术前后进行临床及X线参数评价。结果患者均获得随访,时间4~8年。Harris评分从术前36~75(68.4±8.49)分提高到85~100(92.2±4.05)分(P0.05);其中优25髋,良4髋。影像学观察髋臼内壁截骨处愈合时间3~5个月,术后6~12个月时骨重塑。X线检查显示没有无菌性松动和透亮线,真臼固定稳定。结论在非骨水泥全髋置换术治疗髋关节发育不良中,应用髋臼内壁环形截骨术可以提供良好的髋臼位置、足够的髋臼覆盖及保留足够内壁厚度,并且无需植骨。     

Stabilization of an acetabular fracture with cables for acute total hip arthroplasty

A critical stage of total hip arthroplasty for an acute acetabular fracture where extensive comminution, impaction, and osteopenia thwart the application of conventional open or closed methods, especially in the elderly, is stable fixation of the acetabulum. The use of 2-mm braided cables permits effective immobilization of the fracture for use in conjunction with a hybrid arthroplasty. The method is consistent with the use of a conventional arthroplastic incision and is suitable for other applications including the fixation of periprosthetic fractures, bulk allografts, and conventional acetabular fractures.     

Cementless acetabular fixation in patients 50 years and younger at 10 to 18 years of follow-up

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the 10- to 18-year follow-up of cementless acetabular fixation in patients 50 years and younger. We retrospectively reviewed a consecutive group of 118 patients (144 hips) in whom primary total hip arthroplasty had been performed by 2 surgeons using a cementless acetabular component. Two (1.4%) cementless acetabular components were revised because of aseptic loosening. Twenty-four hips (16.7%) were revised for any mechanical failure of the acetabular component mostly related to acetabular liner wear and osteolysis. The average linear wear rate was 0.19 mm per year, which was higher than our previous reports with cemented acetabular fixation. The fiber mesh ingrowth surface of the cementless acetabular component in this study was superior to cemented acetabular components in terms of fixation. However, the high rates of wear and osteolysis have led to poor overall acetabular component construct survivorship.     

Displaced acetabular fractures

Displaced acetabular fractures occur primarily in young adults involved in high energy trauma and can lead to disabling posttraumatic arthritis. An initial roentgenographic evaluation with accurate delineation of all fracture lines provides the key to decisions about whether to give closed or open treatment. When open treatment is indicated, a surgical approach can be chosen that will almost always lead to reduction without the necessity of a second approach. The authors have found that the Kocher-Langenbeck, ilioinguinal, and extended iliofemoral approaches are the most useful. A fracture table and specialized reduction instruments aid fracture reduction and fixation. Satisfactory operative reduction of the fracture is the factor that correlates best with a satisfactory clinical result. The rate of satisfactory operative reductions improved gradually over the first 50 operations of a prospective study of 121 displaced acetabular fractures. Overall, there were 80% satisfactory clinical results in this series. Complications included a 3% infection rate and a 5% incidence of nerve palsy. Open reduction and internal fixation are indicated for the majority of displaced fractures. However, closed treatment can produce satisfactory results in selected patients.     

The fate of revised uncemented acetabular components in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

The results of patients with rheumatoid arthritis who had revision hip arthroplasty have been studied infrequently. The purpose of this study was to review the authors' clinical and radiographic experiences and outcomes with revision hip arthroplasty. Revision total hip arthroplasties were done on 28 patients (30 hips). All hips had morselized bone grafting and four hips had bulk allografts for segmental defects. The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was 50 years (range, 20-74 years). Patients were followed up for 4 to 15 years (mean, 7 years). At the latest followup, 14 hips (13 patients) of the 30 hips (47%) had good and excellent Harris hip score ratings. Mechanical failures included six hips (five patients) that had revision arthroplasty and two hips (two patients) that had resection arthroplasty. Six other hips (five patients) had poor Harris hip score ratings. The Kaplan-Meier survivorship curve for failure of the acetabular component revealed an 89% chance of survivorship curve for failure of the acetabular component revealed an 89% chance of survival at 60 months and a 44% chance of survival at 108 months. Based on the results of this study, revision hip arthroplasty for acetabular loosening with a cementless acetabular prosthesis has a low rate of success in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.     

A constrained liner cemented into a secure cementless acetabular shell

BACKGROUND: Constrained acetabular components have been used to treat hips with recurrent instability following total hip arthroplasty and hips that demonstrate instability during revision surgery. In such hips, when a secure cementless acetabular shell is present, the surgeon can cement a constrained liner into the existing shell. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcome of this technique with use of a tripolar constrained liner that was cemented into a well-fixed cementless acetabular shell. METHODS: Between 1988 and 2000, constrained liners were cemented into thirty-one well-fixed cementless acetabular shells at three centers. The average age of the patients at the time of the index surgery was 72.1 years, and the indications for the procedure were recurrent hip instability in sixteen hips and intraoperative instability in fifteen hips. The patients were evaluated with respect to the clinical outcome and radiographic evidence of shell loosening and osteolysis. RESULTS: At an average duration of follow-up of 3.9 years, twenty-nine liners (94%) were securely fixed in the cementless shells and two constrained liners had failed. One liner failed because it separated from the cement, and one failed because of fracture of the capturing mechanism. Both hips were successfully revised with another cemented tripolar constrained liner. No acetabular component demonstrated radiographic evidence of progressive loosening or osteolysis. CONCLUSIONS: A constrained tripolar liner cemented into a secure, well-positioned cementless acetabular shell provides stability and durability at short-term follow-up. Careful attention to the preparation of the liner, the sizing of the component, and the cementing technique are likely to reduce the failure of this construct, which can be used for difficult cases of total hip instability.     

Revision of a cemented acetabular component to a cementless acetabular component. A ten to fourteen-year follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: Although cementless acetabular components are routinely used in revision hip surgery, few investigators have evaluated the retention and efficacy of these components in the long term. In the current study, the clinical and radiographic outcomes of a series of arthroplasties performed by one surgeon with a cementless acetabular component were assessed at a minimum of ten years. METHODS: From 1986 through 1988, sixty-one consecutive revision total hip arthroplasties were performed in fifty-five patients because of aseptic failure of one or both components of a prosthesis in which both components had been cemented. Twenty-eight patients (thirty-two hips) were alive at a mean of 12.9 years (range, 11.5 to 14.3 years) after the operation. In all of the patients, the acetabular component was revised to a porous-coated Harris-Galante component inserted without cement, and the femoral component was revised to an Iowa component affixed with contemporary cementing techniques. The hips were evaluated clinically and radiographically at a minimum of ten years subsequent to the index revision. No hips were lost to follow-up. RESULTS: None of the acetabular components required revision because of aseptic loosening. Two hips (3%) demonstrated radiographic evidence of aseptic loosening of the acetabular component. The polyethylene liner was exchanged during the follow-up period in eight hips. CONCLUSION: After a minimum of ten years of follow-up, cementless acetabular fixation in revision hip arthroplasty had produced durable results that were markedly better than those reported for acetabular fixation with cement.     

Cementless acetabular reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty

Reconstruction of the failed acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty (THA) can be challenging. Although there are multiple reconstructive options available, a cementless acetabular component inserted with screws has been shown to have good intermediate-term results and is the reconstructive method of choice for the majority of acetabular revisions. We reviewed the results of 138 consecutive acetabular revisions done with a hemispheric, cementless acetabular component that is sintered with Ti fiber metal mesh and was inserted with line-to-line reaming and multiple screws for fixation. At a mean of 15 years, 19 acetabular components had been revised (13.8%); seven were revised for recurrent instability, six were revised for deep periprosthetic infection, five well-fixed cups were removed at the time of femoral revision, and one cup was fixed by fibrous tissue only at the time of femoral revision and was removed. One acetabular component was radiographically loose. Survivorship of the component was 81% at 15 years when revision for any reason was considered as an end point and 96% when revision for loosening or radiographic evidence of loosening was considered as a second end point. Cementless acetabular revision provides durable results at 15 years with a low rate of failure for loosening.