Colorectal cancer "methylator phenotype": fact or artifact?

It has been proposed that human colorectal tumors can be classified into two groups: one in which methylation is rare, and another with methylation of several loci associated with a "CpG island methylated phenotype (CIMP)," characterized by preferential proximal location in the colon, but otherwise poorly defined. There is considerable overlap between this putative methylator phenotype and the well-known mutator phenotype associated with microsatellite instability (MSI). We have examined hypermethylation of the promoter region of five genes (DAPK, MGMT, hMLH1, p16INK4a, and p14ARF) in 106 primary colorectal cancers. A graph depicting the frequency of methylated loci in the series of tumors showed a continuous, monotonically decreasing distribution quite different from the previously claimed discontinuity. We observed a significant association between the presence of three or more methylated loci and the proximal location of the tumors. However, if we remove from analysis the tumors with hMLH1 methylation or those with MSI, the significance vanishes, suggesting that the association between multiple methylations and proximal location was indirect due to the correlation with MSI. Thus, our data do not support the independent existence of the so-called methylator phenotype and suggest that it rather may represent a statistical artifact caused by confounding of associations.     

Differences in loss of p16INK4 protein expression by promoter methylation between left- and right-sided primary colorectal carcinomas

The p16INK4 gene, encoding a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, is frequently methylated in colorectal cancer, and a side-specific methylation frequency was suggested. To clarify the frequency of real loss of tumor suppressor function dependent on anatomical localization, we investigated 43 primary colorectal carcinomas by determining aberrant promoter methylation using methylation-specific PCR. In addition, we evaluated the p16INK4 protein expression immunohistochemically. P16INK4 methylation was found in 18 of 43 (41.9%) cases. Fourteen of 43 cases (32.6%) were negative for p16INK4 protein, whereas 10 of these 14 cases showed methylation of the promoter region of the p16INK4 gene. Methylation of the promoter region was significantly correlated with loss of p16INK4 protein (p<0.01). P16INK4 tumor suppressor inactivation was significantly correlated with proximal location (p=0.031 for methylation and p=0.028 for immunostaining). The groups characterized by tumors with and without aberrant promoter methylation or loss of p16INK4 immunostaining showed no significant difference in either Dukes' stage and grade or age and gender. This is further evidence that p16INK4 methylation causes gene silencing. Loss of p16INK4 tumor suppressor function in colorectal tumors was associated with proximal location in the gut.     

High-density methylation of p14ARF and p16INK4A in Epstein-Barr virus-associated gastric carcinoma

Promoter hypermethylation of various tumor-related genes is extremely frequent in gastric carcinoma (GC) associated with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). To investigate the significance of the promoter methylation in this type of GC, we examined the methylation densities of the promoter regions of p14ARF and p16INK4A in EBV-associated (n=7) and EBV-negative (n=14) GC. Bisulfite sequencing demonstrated a high frequency of concurrent methylation of p14ARF and p16INK4A promoter regions in EBVaGC. Methylation was observed in all 29 CpG sites of p14ARF and all 16 sites of p16INK4A with equally high densities. In EBV-negative GC, the methylation profiles differed between the 2 genes. Promoter methylation was sporadic and variable in p14ARF, and only the last position of CpG in p14ARF was methylated at high frequency. High-density methylation in p16INK4A was observed in a subset of GC, but the first position of CpG was never methylated in EBV-negative GC. These findings suggest the presence of mechanisms of de novo and maintenance methylation specific to EBVaGC that might be associated with EBV infection.     

Promoter Hypermethylation Frequency and BRAF Mutations Distinguish Hereditary Non-Polyposis Colon Cancer from Sporadic MSI-H Colon Cancer

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancers resulting from defective DNA mismatch repair can occur in both hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer (HNPCC) and in the sporadic setting. They are characterised by a high level of microsatellite instability (MSI-H) and superficially resemble each other in that they are frequently located in the proximal colon and share features such as circumscribed tumour margins and tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes. However, significant differences can be demonstrated at the molecular level including widespread promoter hypermethylation and BRAF -activating mutations which occur significantly less often in HNPCC. AIMS: In this study, we sought to determine whether the presence of widespread promoter hypermethylation and BRAF mutations would exclude HNPCC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We investigated the methylation status of four methylated in tumour markers (MINTs 1,2,12 and 31), and the promoter regions of 5 genes hMLH1, HPP1, MGMT, p16INK4A and p14ARF, in 21 sporadic MSI-H colorectal cancers and compared these with 18 cancers from HNPCC patients. The methylation status of CpG islands were determined by either methylation specific PCR (MSP) or combined bisulfite restricton analysis (COBRA). In addition we considered the BRAF mutation status of 18 HNPCC tumours and 19 sporadic MSI-H cancers which had been previously determined by RFLP analysis and confirmatory sequencing. RESULTS: Methylation of the promoter regions in target genes occurred less frequently within the HNPCC tumours (27% of analyses), compared with the sporadic MSI-H tumours (59% of analyses) (P < 0.001). Methylation of MINTs 1, 2, 12 and 31 occurred in 4% of analyses for HNPCC tumours contrasted with 73% for sporadic MSI-H tumours (P < 0.001). BRAF mutations were detected in 74% of sporadic tumours but none of the HNPCC cancers tested. CONCLUSIONS: The total number of genes and MINTs methylated in HNPCC was lower than in MSI-H colorectal tumours. No HNPCC tumour showed evidence of widespread promoter hypermethylation or BRAF mutation suggesting this feature could be used as a discriminator between familial and sporadic cases.     

Aberrant promoter methylation of multiple genes in non-small cell lung cancers

Aberrant methylation of CpG islands acquired in tumor cells in promoter regions is one method for loss of gene function. We determined the frequency of aberrant promoter methylation (referred to as methylation) of the genes retinoic acid receptor beta-2 (RARbeta), tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 3 (TIMP-3), p16INK4a, O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT), death-associated protein kinase (DAPK), E-cadherin (ECAD), p14ARF, and glutathione S-transferase P1 (GSTP1) in 107 resected primary non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) and in 104 corresponding nonmalignant lung tissues by methylation-specific PCR. Methylation in the tumor samples was detected in 40% for RARbeta, 26% for TIMP-3, 25% for p16INK4a, 21% for MGMT, 19% for DAPK, 18% for ECAD, 8% for p14ARF, and 7% for GSTP1, whereas it was not seen in the vast majority of the corresponding nonmalignant tissues. Moreover, p16INK4a methylation was correlated with loss of p16INK4a expression by immunohistochemistry. A total of 82% of the NSCLCs had methylation of at least one of these genes; 37% of the NSCLCs had one gene methylated, 22% of the NSCLCs had two genes methylated, 13% of the NSCLCs had three genes methylated, 8% of the NSCLCs had four genes methylated, and 2% of the NSCLCs had five genes methylated. Methylation of these genes was correlated with some clinicopathological characteristics of the patients. In comparing the methylation patterns of tumors and nonmalignant lung tissues from the same patients, there were many discordancies where the genes methylated in nonmalignant tissues were not methylated in the corresponding tumors. This suggests that the methylation was occurring as a preneoplastic change. We conclude that these findings confirm in a large sample that methylation is a frequent event in NSCLC, can also occur in smoking-damaged nonmalignant lung tissues, and may be the most common mechanism to inactivate cancer-related genes in NSCLC.     

Evidence for the role of aberrant DNA methylation in the pathogenesis of Lynch syndrome adenomas

Colorectal cancer (CRC) forms through a series of histologic steps that are accompanied by mutations and epigenetic alterations, which is called the polyp-cancer sequence. The role of epigenetic alterations, such as aberrant DNA methylation, in the polyp-cancer sequence in sporadic CRC and particularly in hereditary colon cancer is not well understood. Consequently, we assessed the methylation status of CDKN2A/p16, MGMT, MLH1 and p14(ARF) in adenomas arising in the Lynch syndrome, a familial colon cancer syndrome caused by MLH1 and MSH2 mutations, to determine if DNA methylation is a "second hit" mechanism in CRC and to characterize the role of DNA methylation in the polyp phase of the Lynch syndrome. We found MLH1 and p14(ARF) are methylated in 53 and 60% of the Lynch syndrome adenomas and in 4 and 20% of sporadic adenomas, whereas CDKN2A/p16 and MGMT are methylated in 6 and 14% of the Lynch syndrome adenomas versus 50 and 64% of sporadic adenomas. Therefore, the frequency and pattern of gene methylation varies between the Lynch syndrome and sporadic colon adenomas, implying differences in the molecular pathogenesis of the tumors. MLH1 methylation in the Lynch syndrome adenomas suggests gene methylation might have a role in the initiation of these neoplasms.     

Molecular characteristics and predictors of survival in patients with malignant neuroendocrine tumors

To better understand the molecular pathogenesis of neuroendocrine tumors (NET), we investigated the molecular and clinical characteristics of malignant poorly differentiated colorectal NET and compared these findings with sporadic CRC and well-differentiated benign and malignant fore-/midgut NET. Tumors were analyzed and correlated for microsatellite instability (MSI) and the CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP). NET were scored for proliferation using Ki-67. A total of 34 malignant poorly differentiated colorectal NET, 38 well-differentiated benign and malignant fore-/midgut-NET and 150 sporadic colorectal cancers (CRC) with known MSI status were investigated. Among the sporadic CRC, CIMP was significantly correlated with MSI-high (MSI-H) (p < 0.001). Of the 34 colorectal NET, 0/1 of the MSI-H, 3/5 (60%) of the MSI-L and 13/19 (68%) of the MSS tumors were CIMP+ (p = 0.17). Of the fore-/midgut-NET, none was MSI-H. 20/34 (59%) colorectal NET vs. 11/38 (29%) fore-/midgut-NET were CIMP+ (p = 0.01). The Ki-67 index was significantly higher in poorly differentiated colorectal NET compared to the less malignant fore-/midgut-NET (p < 0.0001). Besides the location in the colon, Ki-67 predicted poor outcome in NET (p < 0.0001). CIMP status did not affect survival. In NET, p16 methylation predicted a poor outcome (p = 0.0004). We conclude that molecular pathogenesis in sporadic CRC and poorly differentiated colorectal NET is different despite some similarities. Main differences between malignant well-differentiated and poorly differentiated NET are the Ki-67 proliferation rate and differential methylation in tumor-associated genes. Predictors of a poor outcome in patients with NET are poor differentiation, a high Ki-67 index and p16 methylation.     

DNA methylation patterns in adenomas from FAP, multiple adenoma and sporadic colorectal carcinoma patients

Colorectal adenomas have traditionally been regarded as homogeneous. The aim of our study was to identify molecular features that may differentiate sporadic adenomas from familial adenomas such as Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP) and Multiple Adenoma patients. DNA methylation was tested at Methylated IN Tumor (MINT) loci (1,2,12,31) and the CpG promoter region of genes MLH1, HPP1, MGMT, p14ARF and p16INK4a in FAP-associated adenomas (33) from 5 patients with a known APC mutation (Group 1, FAP), adenomas (29) from 4 Multiple Adenoma patients (Group 2 Multiple), adenomas (14) from 3 patients with sporadic colorectal cancers showing high microsatellite instability (Group 3, MSI-H) and adenomas (16) from 7 patients, with sporadic colorectal cancers showing microsatellite stable or low level instability (Group 4, MSS/MSI-L). Aberrant Crypt Foci (ACFs), Hyperplastic Polyps (HPs) and cancers were also examined for methylation status as well as K-ras mutation. Multiple Adenoma patients were examined for germline polymorphisms in the base excision repair gene, MYH. The familial syndrome, FAP -associated adenomas showed a significantly low frequency of MINT methylation (15.5%,) compared to sporadic MSS/MSI-L-associated adenomas (35.5%). Group 3 (MSI-H) adenomas were different in that many showed serration and a high level of methylation (57.1%). Group 2, Multiple Adenoma cases, resembled sporadic MSS/MSI-L-associated adenomas. However the promoter regions of key genes, MGMT, p14ARF and p16INK4a were methylated to a greater extent than MINTs in both sporadic and familial adenomas. Genetic profiling of adenomas supports the concept that adenomas belonging to familial syndromes pursue a different pathway to tumorigenesis than their sporadic counterpar/ts from their earliest formation.     

Methylation and expression of p16INK4 tumor suppressor gene in primary colorectal cancer tissues

It is known that p16(INK4) tumor suppressor gene expression in colon cancer cells is repressed by methylation at the CpG island of promoter, but in vivo silencing of p16 gene is not fully understood. Some studies showed that primary colorectal cancer (CRC) tissues often overexpress the p16 protein, while others showed the high incidence of p16 methylation. The aim of this study was to clarify p16 gene regulation in vivo. We used real-time methylation-specific PCR (MSP) to examine density of p16 methylation, and immunohistochemistry, Western blot analysis to determine p16 protein expression. Methylation was detected in 5 CRC cell lines tested and 9 of 21 (42.9%) CRCs. Four of 5 CRC cell lines did not express p16 mRNA, but 6 of 9 CRCs did express p16 mRNA even with methylation. Real-time MSP showed that CRC tissues had a wide variety in methylation density (methylation index: 0.28-0.91) and that highly methylated CRC tissues displayed significantly lower p16 mRNA expression than those with no-methylation or low-methylation. Immunohistochemistry showed that the majority of CRCs (53 of 55: 96.4%) overexpressed the p16 protein. Low p16 expression was associated with lymph node metastasis (p=0.003) and large tumor size (p=0.048). Western blot in a subset of non-tumor and tumor samples showed a consistent overexpression of the p16 protein. These results showed that CRC tissues displayed variable methylation density, which may be characteristics of p16 gene methylation in vivo. Our data suggest that a low p16 expression due to methylation may contribute to tumor enlargement and expansion of CRC.     

Epigenetic signatures of familial cancer are characteristic of tumor type and family category

Tumor suppressor genes (TSG) may be inactivated by methylation of critical CpG sites in their promoter regions, providing targets for early detection and prevention. Although sporadic cancers, especially colorectal carcinoma (CRC), have been characterized for epigenetic changes extensively, such information in familial/hereditary cancer is limited. We studied 108 CRCs and 63 endometrial carcinomas (EC) occurring as part of hereditary nonpolyposis CRC, as separate familial site-specific entities or sporadically, for promoter methylation of 24 TSGs. Eleven genes in CRC and 6 in EC were methylated in at least 15% of tumors and together accounted for 89% and 82% of promoter methylation events in CRC and EC, respectively. Some genes (e.g., CDH13, APC, GSTP1, and TIMP3) showed frequent methylation in both cancers, whereas promoter methylation of ESR1, CHFR, and RARB was typical of CRC and that of RASSF1(A) characterized EC. Among CRCs, sets of genes with methylation characteristic of familial versus sporadic tumors appeared. A TSG methylator phenotype (methylation of at least 5 of 24 genes) occurred in 37% of CRC and 18% of EC (P = 0.013), and the presence versus absence of MLH1 methylation divided the tumors into high versus low methylation groups. In conclusion, inactivation of TSGs by promoter methylation followed patterns characteristic of tumor type (CRC versus EC) and family category and was strongly influenced by MLH1 promoter methylation status in all categories. Paired normal tissues or blood displayed negligible methylation arguing against a constitutional methylation abnormality in familial cases.     

Expression of the p16INK4a gene and methylation pattern of CpG sites in the promoter region in rat tumor cell lines

Loss of p16(INK4a) protein expression has frequently been related to DNA methylation in association with gene silencing. Although the methylation status of exon1alpha for p16(INK4a) involvement in various cancers has been extensively analyzed, it has been pointed out that some inconsistencies existed in its relationship to gene silencing of p16(INK4a). In this study, we focused on the expression and methylation status in the regions of nt -478 to -201, containing a putative TATA box (nt -401 to -396), and nt -233 to 26, both in a recently cloned 5' upstream region of rat p16(INK4a). We showed that rat lung adenocarcinoma RLCNR did not express the p16(INK4a) gene, whereas rat osteosarcoma COS1NR and malignant fibrous histiocytoma MFH1NR both expressed it at levels similar to normal fibroblasts, even though the region of nt -233 to 26 was hypermethylated in COS1NR rather than RLCNR. In contrast, the CpG islands near the putative TATA box region were consistently methylated in RLCNR, but not in COS1NR and MFH1NR, as well as in normal fibroblasts. Treatment with 5-aza 2'-deoxycytidine induced expression of p16(INK4a) gene in RLCNR after 48 h, but no changes were observed in COS1NR and MFH1NR. The results indicated that methylation of CpG islands near a TATA box region played a critical role for gene silencing of the rat p16(INK4a) gene, rather than that of other regions.     

Screening for genomic fragments that are methylated specifically in colorectal carcinoma with a methylated MLH1 promoter

A subset of colorectal carcinomas (CRCs) is associated with microsatellite instability (MSI) of the genome. Although extensive methylation of CpG islands within the promoter regions of DNA mismatch repair genes such as MLH1 is thought to play a central role in tumorigenesis for MSI-positive sporadic CRCs, it has been obscure whether such aberrant epigenetic regulation occurs more widely and affects other cancer-related genes in vivo. Here, by using methylated CpG island amplification coupled with representational difference analysis (MCA-RDA), we screened genomic fragments that are selectively methylated in CRCs positive for MLH1 methylation, resulting in the identification of hundreds of CpG islands containing genomic fragments. Methylation status of such CpG islands was verified for 28 genomic clones in 8 CRC specimens positive for MLH1 methylation and the corresponding paired normal colon tissue as well as in 8 CRC specimens negative for methylation. Many of the CpG islands were preferentially methylated in the MLH1 methylation-positive CRC specimens, although methylation of some of them was more widespread. These data provide insights into the complex regulation of the methylation status of CpG islands in CRCs positive for MSI and MLH1 methylation.     

Aberrant CpG Island Methylation of Multiple Genes in Ependymal Tumors

Aberrant methylation of promoter CpG islands in human genes represents an alternative mechanism for genetic inactivation, and contributes to the development of human tumors. Nevertheless, thus far, few reports have analyzed methylation in ependymomas. We determined the frequency of aberrant CpG island methylation of several tumor-associated genes: p16(INK4a), RB1, MGMT, DAPK, TIMP3, THBS1, TP73, NF2 and Caspase 8 in a group of 27 ependymomas, consisting of 22 WHO grade II samples and five anaplastic WHO grade III tumors. The respective methylation indices (number of genes methylated/total genes analyzed) for both tumor groups was 0.195 and 0.198. Overall methylation rates greater than 20% were detected in MGMT, TIMP3, THBS1 and TP73. NF2 and Caspase 8 each presented hypermethylation in less than 10% of cases, and the cell-cycle regulators RB1/p16(INK4a) were hypermethylated in 4% and 18% of the samples, respectively, mostly affecting the low-grade forms. Our findings suggest that methylation commonly contributes to the inactivation of cancer-related genes in ependymomas.     

The MTHFR C677T and ΔDNMT3B C‐149T polymorphisms confer different risks for right‐ and left‐sided colorectal cancer

Etiological risk factors for proximal (right‐sided) colon cancers may be different to those of distal colon and rectal (left‐sided) cancers if these tumors develop along distinct pathways. The CpG Island Methylator Phenotype (CIMP+) occurs in approximately 15% of colorectal cancers (CRC) and predominantly in the proximal colon. CIMP+ tumors have frequent methylation of gene promoter regions and increased tissue folate levels. The aim here was to determine whether polymorphisms in 2 genes involved in cellular methyl group metabolism were associated with different risks for right‐ and left‐sided CRC. This population‐based case–control study involved 859 incident cases of CRC and 973 sex and age‐matched controls. Information on dietary folate and alcohol intake was obtained from food frequency questionnaires and information on the anatomical site of tumors from pathology reports. DNA was collected using FTA cards and genotyping performed for the MTHFR C677T and ΔDNMT3B C‐149T polymorphisms. The MTHFR 677 T allele was associated with increased risk for proximal colon cancer (adjusted odds ratio, AOR = 1.29) but decreased risk for distal cancers (AOR = 0.87). The increased risk for proximal cancers was especially pronounced in older individuals (AOR = 1.49) and those with a low folate diet (AOR = 1.67) or high alcohol consumption (AOR = 1.90). The ΔDNMT3B‐149 TT genotype was protective against proximal colon cancers (AOR = 0.65), but showed no association with the risk of distal colon and rectal cancers (AOR = 1.02). Epidemiological studies on dietary and genetic risk factors for CRC should take into account these may confer different risks for right‐ and left‐sided tumors. © 2009 UICC     

Aberrant promoter methylation of previously unidentified target genes is a common abnormality in medulloblastomas--implications for tumor biology and potential clinical utility

Medulloblastomas exhibit an array of diverse cytogenetic abnormalities. To evaluate the significance of epigenetic rather than genetic lesions in medulloblastomas and other primitive neuroectodermal tumors (PNETs) of the childhood CNS we performed a systematic analysis of gene specific and global methylation. Methylation-specific PCR detected no methylation for p15(INK4B), von Hippel Lindau and TP53 and only limited methylation for E-Cadherin and p16(INK4A) in tumors. The cell lines Daoy and MHH-PNET-5 in which the p16(INK4A) promoter was methylated did not express the gene, but demonstrated abnormalities by SSCP. Immunohistochemistry for p16 was negative in all examined normal cerebella and medulloblastomas. Using the technique of Restriction Landmark Genomic Scanning we detected methylation affecting up to 1% of all CpG islands in primary MB/PNETs and 6% in MB cell lines. Methylation patterns differed between medulloblastomas and PNETs. Examination of several methylated sequences revealed homologies to known genes and expressed sequences. Analysis of survival data identified seven of 30 hypermethylated sequences significantly correlating with poor prognosis. We suggest that DNA hypermethylation has an outstanding potential for the identification of novel tumor suppressors as well as diagnostic and therapeutic targets in MBs and other PNETs of the CNS.     

P16 methylation of the colorectal cancer and association with dukes stages

Since its discovery as a CDKi (cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor) in 1993, the tumor suppressor p16(INK4/MTS1/CDKN2A) has been found to play animportant role in carcinogenesis[1,2]. A high frequency of p16 gene alterations were observed in many tumors. P16 gene alterations have at least three ways: homozygousdeletion, point mutation and methylation of thepromoter[3]. The first two mechanisms have never been found in colorectal cancer[3-5]. The role of p16 gene methylation in tumorigenesi…