Consistency of complex fractionated atrial electrograms during atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND: Temporal variation in complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAEs) exists during atrial fibrillation (AF). OBJECTIVE: This study sought to quantify the variation in CFAEs using a fractionation interval (FI) algorithm and to define the shortest optimal recording duration required to consistently characterize the magnitude of the fractionation. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients undergoing AF mapping in the left atrium were studied. The FI and frequency analysis were performed at each mapped site for recording durations of 1 to 8 seconds. The magnitude of the fractionation was quantified by the FI algorithm, which calculated the mean interval between multiple, discrete deflections during AF. The results from each duration were statistically compared with the maximal-duration recording, as a standard. The FI values were compared with the dominant frequency values obtained from the associated frequency spectra. RESULTS: The FIs obtained from recording durations between 5 and 8 seconds had a smaller variation in the FI (P < .05) and, for those sites with a FI < 50 ms, the fractionation was typically continuous. The fast-Fourier Transform spectra obtained from the CFAE sites with recording durations of >5 seconds harbored higher dominant frequency values than those with shorter recording durations (8.1 +/- 2.5 Hz vs. 6.8 +/- 0.98 Hz, P < .05). The CFAE sites with continuous fractionation were located within the pulmonary veins and their ostia in 77% of patients with paroxysmal AF, and in only 29% of patients with nonparoxysmal AF (P < .05). CONCLUSION: The assessment of fractionated electrograms requires a recording duration of > or =5 seconds at each site to obtain a consistent fractionation. Sites with the shortest FIs consistently identified sites with the fastest electrogram activity throughout the entire left atrium and pulmonary veins.     

Electrophysiological characteristics of complex fractionated electrograms and high frequency activity in atrial fibrillation

Background

It is unclear whether atrial substrate with complex fractionated electrograms (CFAEs) is related to arrhythmogenesis. This study aimed to investigate the electrophysiology in CFAE and high dominant frequency (DF) areas.

Methods and results

Atrial fibrillation (AF) was induced by rapid atrial pacing in heart failure (HF) rabbits (4 weeks after coronary artery ligation). Real-time substrate mapping, multielectrode array, and monophasic action potential recordings were used to study areas of CFAE and DF. Conventional microelectrode and western blot were used to record the action potentials (APs) and protein expression in isolated tissue preparations. CFAE site with high DF had the most depolarized resting membrane potential, highest incidence of early and delayed afterdepolarizations, and steepest maxima slope of 90% of AP duration (APD₉₀) restitution curve (RC) compared to CFAE site with low DF or non-CFAE sites. CFAE site with high DF exhibited the slowest conduction velocity and shortest wavelength than the other areas. Upregulation of the Na⁺–Ca^2 + exchanger (NCX), apamin-sensitive small-conductance Ca^2 +-activated K⁺ channel type 2 (SK2) and sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca^2 +-ATPase, and downregulation of the Kir2.1 were found at CFAE site with high DF compared to that observed in the 3 other areas. Inhibition of the NCX and SK channels prolonged the APD₉₀, flattened the maximum slope of RC, and suppressed AF.

Conclusions

CFAE site with high DF had an arrhythmogenic property differing significantly from the other areas of LA in an HF rabbit model, which may contribute to the genesis of AF.     

Prolonged and fractionated right atrial electrograms during sinus rhythm in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and sick sinus node syndrome

Intraatrial catheter mapping of the right atrium was performed during sinus rhythm in 92 patients: Group I = 43 control patients without paroxysmal atrial fibrillation or sick sinus node syndrome; Group II = 31 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation but without sick sinus node syndrome; and Group III = 18 patients with both paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and sick sinus node syndrome. Atrial electrograms were recorded at 12 sites in the right atrium. The duration and number of fragmented deflections of the atrial electrograms were quantitatively measured. The mean duration and number of fragmented deflections of the 516 atrial electrograms in Group I were 74 +/- 11 ms and 3.9 +/- 1.3, respectively. The criteria for an abnormal atrial electrogram were defined as a duration of greater than or equal to 100 ms or eight or more fragmented deflections, or both. Abnormal atrial electrograms were observed in 10 patients (23.3%) in Group I, 21 patients (67.7%) in Group II and 15 patients (83.3%) in Group III (Group II versus Group I, p less than 0.001; Group III versus Group I, p less than 0.001). The mean number of abnormal electrograms per patient with an abnormal electrogram was 1.3 +/- 0.7 in Group I, 2.5 +/- 1.9 in Group II and 3.5 +/- 2.5 in Group III (Group I versus Group II, p less than 0.01; Group II versus Group III, p less than 0.05). A prolonged and fractionated atrial electrogram characteristic of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation can be closely related to the vulnerability of the atrial muscle.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Time- and frequency-domain characteristics of atrial electrograms during sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation

Ablation and Spectral Characteristics of Fibrillation. Background: Complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE) have been considered to be helpful during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). The purpose of this study was to analyze the characteristics of CFAEs recorded during sinus rhythm (SR) and AF, and to determine their relationship to perpetuation of AF and clinical outcome. Methods and Results: Antral pulmonary vein isolation (APVI) was performed in 34 consecutive patients (age = 59 ± 10 years) with paroxysmal AF who presented in SR. Time‐ and frequency‐domain characteristics of electrograms recorded from the same sites in the coronary sinus (CS) were analyzed during SR and AF, before and during isoproterenol infusion. There was a modest correlation in fractionation index (FI: change in the direction of depolarization, r = 0.40, P = 0.001) and complexity index (CI: change in the polarity of depolarization, r = 0.41, P = 0.001), but not in the dominant frequency (DF) between SR and AF. There was no relationship between the DF and CI or FI during AF. Isoproterenol was associated with an increase in DF during AF (6.6 ± 0.9 vs 5.1 ± 0.6 Hz, P < 0.001) but had no effect on CI or FI (P = 0.6). A higher CI (58.3 ± 21.0/s vs 38.0 ± 21.0/s, P < 0.01), and FI (123.5 ± 44.8/s vs 75.6 ± 44.6/s, P < 0.01) during AF were associated with a lower likelihood of termination of AF during APVI and a higher probability of recurrent AF after ablation. Ratio of FI during AF to SR was also higher when AF persisted than terminated after APVI (29.7 ± 12.4 vs 19.1 ± 9.7, P = 0.002). However, time‐ or frequency‐domain parameters during SR were not predictive of termination or clinical outcome. Conclusions: Structural and functional properties of the atrial myocardium during AF contribute to electrogram complexity, which may indicate the presence of extra‐PV mechanisms of AF that are not eliminated by APVI. Mapping of complex electrograms in SR is not likely to be sufficient to identify drivers of AF. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 22, pp. 851‐857, August 2011)     

Effects of inter-electrode spacing on complex fractionated atrial electrograms and dominant frequency detection

Background  

The influence of inter-electrode spacing (IES) on complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAEs) and dominant frequency (DF) detection was assessed.     

Characteristics and distribution of complex fractionated atrial electrograms and the dominant frequency during atrial fibrillation: relationship to the response and outcome of circumferential pulmonary vein isolation

Background

Although sites of complex fractionated electrograms (CFAEs) and dominant frequency (DF) are known to be critical for the maintenance of atrial fibrillation (AF), spatial distribution of CFAEs and DF and their impact on the outcome of AF ablation remain unclear.

Methods

We created CFAE and DF maps of the left atrium (LA), right atrium, and pulmonary veins (PVs) with a NavX mapping system and simultaneously calculated the DF values with a Bard LabSystem Pro in 40 patients with AF (nonparoxysmal, n?=?16).

Results

In 19 patients in whom circumferential PV isolation (CPVI) terminated AF, there was a high DF in the PVs (Bard-based DF value, 6.70?±?1.01?Hz), low DF in the LA body (5.94?±?0.75?Hz), and a significant PV-to-LA body DF gradient (0.76?±?0.65?Hz), and the CFAEs were located mainly in the PV antrum. In the 21 patients not responding to CPVI, a high DF was located in both the PVs (7.04?±?0.81?Hz) and LA body (6.75?±?0.81?Hz), and therefore, the PV-to-LA body DF gradient was smaller than that in the CPVI responders (0.29?±?0.52?Hz, P?=?0.0160), and the CFAEs extended to the LA body. The higher DF in the LA body, nonparoxysmal AF, and longer AF duration remained as independent predictors of a post-ablation AF recurrence by using a multivariate analysis.

Conclusions

A higher LA-DF value, smaller PV-to-LA DF gradient, and wider LA-CFAE distribution were noted more often in the nonresponders to CPVI than in the responders. This suggested the presence of an arrhythmogenic substrate in the LA beyond the PVs in patients whose AF persisted after CPVI, which was further associated with post-ablation AF recurrence.     

Characteristics and distribution of complex fractionated atrial electrograms in patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation

Introduction  

Substrate-based radiofrequency ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) is still under development. The purpose of this study was to investigate the different characteristics and distribution of complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE) in both atria in patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF.     

The effect of electrogram duration on quantification of complex fractionated atrial electrograms and dominant frequency

Introduction: Sites of complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAEs) and highest dominant frequency (DF) have been proposed as critical regions maintaining atrial fibrillation (AF). This study aimed to determine the minimum electrogram recording duration that accurately characterizes CFAE or DF sites for ablation without unduly lengthening the procedure.
Methods and Results: Fourteen patients with AF undergoing catheter ablation had high-density (498 ± 174 points) biatrial mapping performed during AF before ablation. At each point, 8-second electrograms were recorded. CFAE characterization using the NavX software provided a representation of electrogram complexity (CFE-mean). CFE-mean for each point from 7-, 6-, 5-, 4-, 3-, 2-, and 1-second subsamples were compared with the index 8-second CFE-mean. Offline spectral analysis defined DF as the frequency with greatest power, and DF of subsamples were compared with index DF. Index 8-second electrogram CFE-mean was 114 ± 20 ms for right atria and 102 ± 17 ms for left atria (P = 0.01); DF was 5.7 ± 0.8 Hz for right atria and 6.0 ± 0.8 Hz for left atria (P = 0.02). Means from shorter electrograms were nonsignificantly decreased for CFE-mean and overestimated for DF (P < 0.001). Mean absolute differences between subsampled and index values ranged from 3.3 to 20.1 ms for CFE-mean and 0.11 to 1.18 Hz for DF. Subsampled electrograms deviating >10% from index values ranged from 2.5 to 56% for CFE-mean and 3.5 to 41% for DF. Intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.992 to 0.788 for CFE-mean and 0.897 to 0.233 for DF. Unacceptable differences from index values were found with CFE-mean and DF from electrograms <5 seconds.
Conclusion: Electrograms of ≥5-second duration are required to accurately characterize CFAE and DF sites for ablation.     

Relationship between complex fractionated electrograms (CFE) and dominant frequency (DF) sites and prospective assessment of adding DF-guided ablation to pulmonary vein isolation in persistent atrial fibrillation (AF)

Dominant Frequency Mapping and Ablation . Background: Sites of high DF are potential targets for AF ablation, but it is unknown if addition of DF ablation can improve procedural outcome. Objectives: We sought to (1) examine the relationship between DF sites and complex fractionated electrograms (CFE) and (2) prospectively assess the long‐term outcome of adding DF ablation to pulmonary vein antral isolation (PVAI) for persistent AF. Methods: First, 20 patients with persistent AF who underwent previous CFE‐guided ablation and who had AF terminate during ablation were studied retrospectively (group I). Bipolar, 8‐second electrograms were collected by a circular catheter (288 ± 86 points/map). The EnSite NavX system allows for automated display of both CFE and DF maps. Electrograms with cycle length <120 ms were considered CFE and were compared to DF sites > 8 Hz (direct inverse relationship). Sites of AF termination were related to CFE and DF sites. Based on these observations, 30 different patients (group II) with persistent AF prospectively underwent DF‐guided ablation plus PVAI. They were followed every 3 months for 1 year (visit, Holter, ECG). These patients were compared to case‐matched controls undergoing PVAI alone (group III). Results: In group I, there was a significant, inverse correlation between DF and CFE values at each point (r =–0.24, P < 0.001). DF surface area was less than CFE area (27 ± 5 cm² vs 34 ± 4 cm², P = 0.03). CFE sites overlapped 48 ± 27% with the DF surface area. Nonoverlapping CFE sites were contiguous to DF sites. AF termination occurred where DF and CFE overlapped, and at these sites, DF was always greater than the mean DF for the map. In group II, all DF sites above the mean value were prospectively ablated during AF. AF termination was noted in only 2/30 (7%) patients. After DF ablation, PVAI was performed and termination increased to 4/30 patients (14%). At 1 year, freedom from atrial arrhythmia > 30 seconds occurred in 57% of DF+PVAI compared to 60% in patients receiving PVAI alone (P = 0.18). Conclusions: DF and CFE regions overlap only about 50%. AF termination retrospectively occurred on overlapping CFE/DF sites where DF was above the mean. However, prospective ablation of DF sites plus PVAI resulted in low AF termination rates, and did not improve 1 year success over PVAI alone. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 22, pp. 1309‐1316, December 2011)     

The effect of drugs and lead maturation on atrial electrograms during sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation

Antitachycardia devices need more accurate means to identify arrhythmias. Previous studies have found that sinus rhythm can be distinguished from a variety of tachyarrhythmias by algorithms that are based on time-domain and frequency-domain analysis of intracardiac electrograms. Amplitude distribution analysis (time-domain) and power density spectral analysis (frequency-domain) are two of the techniques that have seemed to hold promise. However, previous studies have not evaluated whether lead maturation or drugs such as lidocaine, propranolol, verapamil, or isoproterenol can interfere with the ability of these algorithms to distinguish among cardiac rhythms. In the present study, five dogs had permanent atrial pacing leads placed. On a series of days, recordings were made from the atrial leads during sinus rhythm and induced sustained atrial fibrillation, both before and after administration of cardioactive drugs. For up to 1 month after implantation, progressive lead maturation did not prevent differentiation of atrial fibrillation from sinus rhythm by either amplitude distribution analysis or power density spectral analysis. However, the difference between the power density spectra of sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation became progressively less with time. Isoproterenol, lidocaine, verapamil, and propranolol had no consistent effects on amplitude distribution analysis of atrial electrograms during sinus rhythm or atrial fibrillation. However, there were marked effects of drugs on amplitude distribution characteristics in individual dogs. Propranolol and lidocaine produced consistent changes in power density spectra during sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation, respectively; both drugs reduced the ability of power density spectral analysis to differentiate sinus rhythm from atrial fibrillation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Automated detection and characterization of complex fractionated atrial electrograms in human left atrium during atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND: Complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAEs) have been reported as ablative targets for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the process of CFAE identification is highly dependent on the operator's judgment. OBJECTIVE: It is the aim of the study to report our initial experience with a novel software algorithm designed to automatically detect CFAEs. METHODS: Nineteen patients (6 female, 58 +/- 8 years) who underwent catheter ablation of paroxysmal (n = 11) or persistent (n = 8) AF were included in the study. During ongoing AF, 100 +/- 15 left atrial (LA) endocardial locations were sampled under the guidance of integrated electroanatomical mapping with computed tomographic images. Bipolar electrograms recorded throughout the LA were analyzed using custom software that allows for automated detection of CFAEs. Interval confidence level (ICL), defined as the number of intervals between consecutive CFAE complexes during 2.5-second recordings, was used to characterize CFAEs. The CFAE sites with an ICL >/=5 were considered as sites with highly repetitive CFAEs, which are thought to be potential ablation targets. For purposes of analysis, the LA was divided into 6 areas: pulmonary vein (PV) ostia, posterior wall, interatrial septum, roof, mitral annulus area, and appendage. RESULTS: Among a total of 1,904 LA locations sampled in 19 patients, 1,644 (86%) were categorized as CFAE sites, whereas 260 (14%) were categorized as as non-CFAE sites. Thirty-four percent of all CFAE sites were identified as sites with highly repetitive CFAEs. Of these, 24% were located at the interatrial septum, 22% on the posterior wall, 20% at the PV ostia, 18% at the mitral annulus area, 14% on the roof, and 2.7% at the LA appendage. In all patients, highly repetitive CFAE sites were distributed in 4 or more areas of the LA. Persistent AF patients had more highly repetitive CFAE sites on the posterior wall than paroxysmal AF patients (30% +/- 7.3% vs 14% +/- 8.2%, P < .001). There was a strong trend toward more highly repetitive CFAE sites located at the PV ostia in patients with paroxysmal AF compared with persistent AF patients (24% +/- 13% vs 13% +/- 7.7%, P = .05). CONCLUSION: With the use of custom software, CFAE complexes were identified in more than 80% of the LA endocardial locations. LA sites with highly repetitive CFAE sites were located predominately in the septum, posterior wall, and PV ostia. Patients with persistent AF had a different anatomical distribution pattern of highly repetitive CFAE sites from those with paroxysmal AF, with a greater prevalence of highly repetitive CFAEs located on the posterior wall. Further studies are warranted to determine the clinical significance of these findings.     

老年对慢性心房颤动患者左房复杂碎裂电位的影响

目的 评价老年对非瓣膜病心房颤动（简称房颤）患者左房复杂碎裂电位（CFAEs）的影响。方法 前瞻性入选116例行导管消融的慢性房颤患者。 以60岁为界,分为老年组（n=48）与非老年组（n=68）。 在CARTO系统指导下记录局部稳定的心内膜电图。 应用CARTO系统内置的CFAEs分析软件进行分析。 以间期置信水平（ICL）来评估CFAEs的特点。 CFAEs指数定义为 ICL≥7 区域的面积与左房表面积的比值。 将左房分为前壁、后壁、顶部、下壁、外侧壁、间隔六个部分,评价CFAEs在左房不同位置的分布特征。 结果 老年组男性患者比例显著低于非老年组,合并高血压、脑卒中的比例显著高于非老年组（P均〈0. 05）。 老年组最大ICL显著大于非老年组[（16.7±2.0） vs （15.7±2.2）,P=0. 014）],老年组CFAEs指数显著高于非老年组[（60. 4%±22.9% ） vs （48. 6%±22. 3% ）,P=0. 007）]。 老年组左房前壁、间隔的CFAEs的分布比例显著大于非老年组。 年龄与CFAEs指数呈正相关（r=0. 244, P=0. 008）。 结论 老年慢性房颤具有广泛的 CFAEs。     

左心房高主频及连续碎裂电位电生理特点与持续性心房颤动射频消融临床疗效的关系

目的 探讨左心房（LA）高主频（HDF）及连续碎裂电位（CCFAE）的电生理特点对持续性心房颤动（AF）射频消融术疗效的影响.方法 入选宁波市第一人民医院2011年10月至2012年6月间,至少经2种抗心律失常药物治疗无效且有症状的持续性AF患者42例,在三维标测系统NavX指导下首先行环肺静脉电隔离术（PVI）,对未转复窦性心律（窦律）者继续行LA内CCFAE及HDF（最高频率位点与邻近点频率相差≥20％,DF值≥7 Hz）标测,消融终点：转为窦律且不能被诱发或消除所有CCFAE,对仍维持AF者,行直流电复律;如转为规则的房性心动过速（房速）,明确其电生理机制后进行消融终止.根据随访结果,分为PVI联合CCFAE消融窦律维持组22例（组1）与复发组16例（组2）,其中4例患者在PVI中恢复窦律,回顾性分析影响预后的因素.结果 继续CCFAE消融后15例转复窦律（10例直接转复）,5例房速经消融终止,18例接受直流电复律.随访（1.4±0.2）年,接受PVI联合CCFAE消融22例（57.9％,组1）维持窦律,两组临床特点为LA内CCFAE均值（CCFAE-mean）、CCFAE最大值（CCFAE-max）、CCFAE/LA面积比差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）,组2平均LA内HDF值（HDF-mean）、HDF最大值（HDF-max）、HDF/LA面积比、CCFAE区域的外周（＞2 cm） HDF、CCFAE-max至HDF-max距离大于组1（P＜0.05）,组1邻近（≤2 cm） HDF的CCFAE区域数量多于组2（P＜0.05）,组1HDF-max位点频谱下降值明显高于组2（P＜0.05）.HDF/LA面积比（OR=2.19,95％CI 1.22～3.92,P＜0.05）、外周HDF的CCFAE区域（OR=0.38,95％CI0.15～0.98,P＜0.05）为射频消融复发的两个独立预测因素.结论 LA内HDF分布及CCFAE与HDF空间关系可能与持续性AF射频消融术后维持有关,提示邻近HDF的CCFAE基质改良策略有效的同时,可减少消融面积.     

Autonomic modulation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

Aims  

In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE) have been shown to be located at the anatomic sites of ganglionated plexi (GP). This study aimed at investigating the contribution of parasympathetic activity to formation of CFAE.     

Radiofrequency ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE): preferential sites of acute termination and regularization in paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation

Introduction: Complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE) have been described as a new target for ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). This prospective study evaluates the acute effects of CFAE ablation in patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF and analyzes the preferential anatomic sites where these effects occur.
Methods and Results: Ablation of CFAE was performed in 66 symptomatic patients (mean age of 58 ± 12 years) with paroxysmal (n = 36) or persistent AF (n = 30). Termination or regularization of AF during ablation of CFAE was achieved in 56 of 66 patients (84%), with termination in 28 of 66 patients (42%) and regularization of AF in 28 of 66 patients (42%). Ablation of CFAE showed no effect in 10 of 66 patients (16%). Termination of AF occurred at 53 sites and AF regularization at 81 sites. The preferential sites of AF termination or regularization were found around the pulmonary veins (termination n = 15; regularization n = 22), at the anterior wall (termination n = 14; regularization n = 19) and at the interatrial septum (termination n = 8; regularization n = 17).
Conclusion: Termination or regularization of AF was achieved acutely in 84% of patients by ablation of CFAE. The preferential sites of AF termination or regularization were found around the pulmonary veins, at the anterior wall of the LA and at the interatrial septum. These findings may have implications for future ablation concepts.     

心房颤动肺静脉前庭和左房内连续碎裂电位的电生理特点

目的探讨阵发性和持续性心房颤动(简称房颤)患者肺静脉前庭(PVO)和左房(LA)内连续碎裂电位(CFEAs)的电生理特点。方法入选24例药物治疗无效的房颤患者,依房颤节律分为阵发性房颤(PAF)组与持续性房颤(PeAF)组,每组各12例,根据距离肺静脉口远近,将肺静脉分成距肺静脉5～10 mm(Ⅰ区)与10～20 mm(Ⅱ区)两区。在房颤时,应用EnSite NavX标测系统高密度标测PVO和LA,比较两组平均CFE值(碎裂间期)≤70ms的CFAEs的电生理特点。结果①PeAF组LA内径大于PAF组(P<0.05),PAF组LA后壁CFAES分布比例最低,顶部最高,PeAF组前后壁最低,左心耳最高;PAF组PVO较LA高(P<0.05),PeAF组PVO和LA无差异。②两组间总PVO区域连续CFAEs比例无差异,PeAF组LA明显高于PAF组(P<0.05),PAF左下PVO连续CFAEs分布比例高于PeAF(P=0.02),另三支PVO无明显差别。除顶部PAF组连续CFAEs分布高于PeAF组(P=0.02)外,PeAF组下壁、左心耳及二尖瓣环均显著高于PAF组(P均<0.001)。③PAF组各支Ⅰ区连续CFAEs分布高于Ⅱ区(P<0.05),PeAF组左下PVOⅠ区高于Ⅱ区(P<0.05),右上PVOⅡ区高于Ⅰ区(P<0.05),另两支PVO无差异。④PAF组PVO平均CFE明显低于LA(P<0.0001),PeAF组两区域及两组间PVO则无差异;PeAF组LA平均CFE值较低,连续CFAEs数量较多,房颤周长较短。结论 LA电解剖重构在房颤维持中起重要作用,PeAF LA内连续CFAEs分布较PAF广泛,碎裂程度更高,房颤周长较短。PVO绝大多数连续CFAEs位于5～10 mm区域。     

Usefulness of ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms using nifekalant in persistent atrial fibrillation

BackgroundAdditional ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE) after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has been shown to improve the success of ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). However, extensive ablation is often necessary to eliminate all CFAE or to terminate AF. We assessed the usefulness of the administration of an antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) before CFAE ablation.Methods and resultsOne-hundred and ten patients with persistent AF first underwent PVI, roof and floor linear ablation (box isolation). One hundred patients who remained in AF after box isolation were then randomized to either receive (AAD group, n = 50) or not receive (no-AAD group, n = 50) intravenous nifekalant (0.3 mg/kg) followed by a CFAE ablation. In the AAD group, nifekalant terminated AF in 19 (38%) patients and ablation of localized CFAE was performed in 31 patients who remained in AF after nifekalant, and terminated AF in 11 (35%) patients. In the no-AAD group, ablation of CFAE terminated AF in 13 (26%) patients. The AAD group had a significantly lesser number of radio frequency applications at CFAE sites (18 ± 12 versus 36 ± 10, p < 0.0001) and shorter procedure time (162 ± 34 versus 197 ± 29 min, p < 0.0001) compared with the no-AAD group. However, there was no significant difference in success rate at 12 months after a single ablation procedure between the two groups (AAD group, 74% versus no-AAD group, 76%).ConclusionsAn approach to ablation using nifekalant may be useful in localizing areas of CFAE, reducing the number of applications at CFAE sites and procedure time. Ablation of only CFAE localized with nifekalant may be sufficient for clinical outcome.