Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a stoichiometry-based model to explain the differing immunogenicities of unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin, and fondaparinux in different clinical settings

INTRODUCTION: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is caused by platelet-activating antibodies that recognize platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin complexes. The frequency of HIT is highly variable in different clinical settings, and is more frequent with unfractionated heparin (UFH) than with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), despite the in vitro observation that HIT antibodies activate platelets similarly well with LMWH as with UFH. An important difference between UFH, LMWH, and fondaparinux is their widely differing plasma concentrations. We aimed to provide a model that included anticoagulant concentrations and PF4 availability as risk factors influencing the anti-PF4/heparin immune response. MATERIALS AND METHODS: By photon correlation spectroscopy we determined the concentrations at which UFH, LMWH, and fondaparinux form complexes optimally with PF4. Plasma concentrations of UFH and LMWH were calculated based on ex vivo pharmacokinetic data, with information on fondaparinux and PF4 concentrations taken from the literature. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The main features of our model are: optimal complex formation occurs at prophylactic-dose UFH and high PF4 levels, whereas therapeutic-dose LMWH concentrations are too high for optimal complex formation; in contrast, concentrations of fondaparinux are usually below the optimal stoichiometric range. Thus, immunization should occur more often in situations with major rather than minor platelet activation, and--for a given degree of platelet activation (PF4 availability)--as: prophylactic-dose UFH>therapeutic-dose UFH>prophylactic-dose LMWH, fondaparinux>therapeutic-dose LMWH. Our model provides a framework for explaining empirical observations that LMWH induces less anti-PF4/heparin antibodies than does UFH, and that anti-PF4/heparin antibodies are more often found in patients undergoing major surgery than in medical patients.     

Combined use of the high heparin step and optical density to optimize diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of an anti-PF4/heparin enzyme-immunoassay

Background

IgG-specific anti-PF4/heparin enzyme-immunoassays (EIAs) are sensitive but not specific for platelet-activating antibodies, the cause of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Two features of EIA reactivity predict for presence of HIT antibodies - the magnitude of a positive result (in optical density [OD] units) and the inhibition of reactivity at high heparin concentrations - but their combined utility remains uncertain.

Objective

To determine for an IgG-specific EIA how the OD values of a positive reaction and its inhibition by high heparin can be optimally combined.

Methods

We screened 1,000 consecutive patients with suspected HIT using an IgG-specific PF4/heparin in-house EIA with and without high heparin (100 IU/mL); and by the heparin-induced platelet activation test.

Results

Platelet-activating antibodies were rarely detected (< 0.2%) when the IgG-specific EIA was negative at the conventional cut-off (OD, 0.5). However, an OD cut-off of 1.0 resulted in an unacceptable loss of sensitivity (14/83 = 17%) for detecting platelet-activating antibodies. The high heparin step increased specificity for platelet-activating antibodies from 72% to 89% without loss of sensitivity when applied to weak-positive sera (OD ≤ 1.0). However, decreased sensitivity was observed with strong-positive sera (OD > 1.0): 11/69 such sera (16%) that did not show > 40% inhibition by high heparin nevertheless contained platelet-activating antibodies.

Conclusion

Specificity of an IgG-specific EIA for detecting platelet-activating antibodies can be optimized by applying the high heparin inhibition step to weak-positive reactions (0.5- ≤ 1.0 OD). However, applying the high heparin inhibition step to strong-positive reactions (> 1.0 OD) in our in-house assay risks falsely classifying a serum as negative for platelet-activating antibodies.     

Antiplatelet factor 4/heparin antibodies in patients with gram negative bacteremia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an antibody-mediated syndrome of thrombocytopenia and prothrombotic state that follows exposure to heparin. However, spontaneous HIT has been described in the setting of infection, without evidence of previous heparin administration. Since PF4 binds to lipid A portion of lipopolysaccharide, we tested for the presence of antiPF4/heparin antibodies in patients with gram-negative bacteremia. Patients with bacteremia had higher titers of antiPF4/heparin antibodies compared to normal controls 26.3 ± SD 34 units, N = 32 versus 6.3 ± SD 2.38 units, N = 10, P = 0.001. FITC-labeled PF4 interacted with lipopolysaccharide in a concentration-dependent manner as determined by quenching of the emission spectrum following excitation at λ 488. In addition, immunoaffinity purified antiPF4/Heparin antibodies from 3 patients with HIT cross-reacted with PF4/heparin complex. These results show that PF4/LPS complex is immunogenic and can elicit cross-reacting antibodies against PF4/Heparin, providing an explanation for the presence of these antibodies in individuals, who were never been exposed to heparin before. These antibodies may also be at least partly responsible for the thrombocytopenia associated with infection.     

Assessment of the performances of AcuStar HIT and the combination with heparin-induced multiple electrode aggregometry: A retrospective study

Background

Early diagnosis of immune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is challenging. HemosIL® AcuStar HIT and heparin-induced multiple electrode aggregometry (HIMEA) were recently proposed as rapid diagnostic methods.

Objectives

We conducted a study to assess performances of AcuStar HIT-IgG (PF4-H) and AcuStar HIT-Ab (PF4-H). The secondary objective was to compare the performances of the combination of Acustar HIT and HIMEA with standardised clinical diagnosis.

Methods

Sera of 104 suspected HIT patients were retrospectively tested with AcuStar HIT. HIMEA was performed on available sera (n = 81). The clinical diagnosis was established by analysing in a standardized manner the patient’s medical records. These tests were also compared with PF4-Enhanced®, LTA, and SRA in subsets of patients. Thresholds were determined using ROC curve analysis with clinical outcome as reference.

Results

Using the recommended thresholds (1.00 AU), the negative predictive value (NPV) of HIT-IgG and HIT-Ab were 100.0% (95% CI: 95.9%-100.0% and 95.7%-100.0%). The positive predictive value (PPV) were 64.3% (95% CI: 35.1%-87.2.2%) and 45.0% (95% CI: 23.2%-68.6%), respectively. Using our thresholds (HIT-IgG: 2.89 AU, HIT-Ab: 9.41 AU), NPV of HIT-IgG and HIT-Ab were 100.0% (95% CI: 96.0%-100.0% and 96.1%-100.0%). PPV were 75.0% (95% CI: 42.7%-94.5%) and 81.8% (95% CI: 48.3%-97.7%), respectively. Of the 79 patients with a medium-high pretest probability score, 67 were negative using HIT-IgG (PF4-H) test at our thresholds. HIMEA was performed on HIT-IgG positive patients. Using this combination, only one patient on 79 was incorrectly diagnosed.

Conclusion

Acustar HIT showed good performances to exclude the diagnosis of HIT. Combination with HIMEA improves PPV.     

Interleukin-10 promoter microsatellite polymorphisms influence the immune response to heparin and the risk of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Introduction

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) results from an atypical immune response with synthesis of IgG antibodies (Abs) to platelet factor 4/heparin complexes (PF4/H), and probably involves both B and T cells. We investigated whether 3 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), rs1800896 (− 1082G/A), rs1800871 (− 819C/T) and rs1800872 (− 592C/A) and the polymorphic CA repeat microsatellites IL10R [5325CA(11_15)] and IL10G [8134CA(14_29)] are associated with the synthesis of Abs to PF4/heparin and HIT.

Materials and methods

Eighty-two patients with definite HIT and two control groups were studied. The first control group (Ab^neg) consisted of 85 patients without Abs to PF4/heparin after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The second control group (Ab^pos) consisted of 84 patients who had developed significant levels of PF4-specific antibodies after CPB, but without HIT.

Results

Allele frequencies of the 3 SNPs were similar in HIT patients and controls. Fourteen alleles in IL10G (G16 to G29) and 3 alleles in IL10R (R13 to R15) were defined. The short G20 allele of IL10G was more frequent in Ab^neg patients (8.2%) than in Ab^pos (2.9%) and HIT patients (3%). It thereby appeared to protect against developing Abs to PF4/heparin (OR 0.29; 95% CI [0.12-0.70], p = 0.006). Combined haplotypes cH1/cH8 comprising the short G20 + R13 alleles were less frequent in HIT (OR 0.33; 95% CI [0.11-0.97], p = 0.036), and levels of Abs to PF4 in Ab^pos patients were lower in cH1/cH8 subjects (p = 0.019).

Conclusion

These results suggest that IL10 promoter microsatellite polymorphisms might influence the immune response against PF4/heparin and the risk of HIT.     

Whole blood impedance aggregometry detects heparin-induced thrombocytopenia antibodies

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a serious complication of heparin use. IgG antibodies to complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin trigger the clinical manifestations of HIT. Only a subset of these antibodies will activate platelets and these can only be identified with platelet aggregation (functional) assays. Heparin-induced platelet aggregation (HIPA) and ¹⁴C-serotonin release (SRA) assays for HIT are time-consuming and complex to perform. We have developed a whole blood impedance (WBI) test using the new Multiplate^® analyser.All samples referred to our laboratory over a 10 month period were screened for heparin-PF4 antibodies by an ELISA method (Zymutest HIA IgG). The 4T's score was used to assess HIT pretest probability.Twenty antibody positive samples were further tested by all three functional assays: light transmission aggregometry (LTA), SRA and WBI. Thirteen out of twenty samples were positive by LTA (10 patients) and 15 by WBI (11 patients). SRA, considered to be the gold standard, was used as a confirmatory test and 11 were found to be positive (10 patients); four discrepant samples were weakly positive by WBI. The prevalence of a positive functional test was strongly correlated with the 4T's clinical risk score, but a small number of low-risk patients had positive functional assays.In this study, the WBI assay detected all SRA positive patients and was positive for two others suggesting greater sensitivity. The rapid and easy to perform assay may be a useful tool for haematology laboratories to detect platelet-activating HIT antibodies.     

Titre of anti-heparin/PF4-antibodies and extent of in vivo activation of the coagulation and fibrinolytic systems

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is mediated by antibodies directed against the heparin/platelet factor 4 (PF4) complex. Our aim was to investigate whether the antibody titre is associated with the degree of in vivo thrombin generation. We measured the anti-heparin/PF4-antibody titre, prothrombin fragments F1+2, thrombin-antithrombin (TAT) complexes and D-dimers in plasma samples from 225 patients with suspected HIT. Antibody titres as detected by a particle gel immunoassay strongly correlated with optical density values measured by ELISA (r=0.84, p<0.0001). Patients with titres > or =4 (n=44) had significantly higher median levels of F1+2 (2.49 nmol/l), TAT (13.01 microg/l) and D-dimers (3340 microg/l) compared to patients with undetectable antibodies (n=148; F1+2 1.61 nmol/l, TAT 4.95 micro g/l, D-dimers 1911 micro g/l; p<0.0001 for all comparisons) or patients with titres of 1-2 (n=33; F1+2 1.44 nmol/l, p=0.0014; TAT 4.37 microg/l, p=0.0018; D-dimers 2231 microg/l, p=0.0016). Multivariate analysis indicated the anti-heparin/PF4-antibody titre as an independent predictor for F1+2 (p=0.0036), TAT (p=0.0176) and D-dimer (p=0.0003) levels. This relationship remained statistically significant after exclusion of patients with concomitant prothrombotic conditions and/or thromboembolic complications during heparin treatment. These data demonstrate that high anti-heparin/PF4-antibody titres are independently associated with an increased in vivo thrombin generation. Rapid determination of the anti-heparin/PF4-antibody titre could help guide clinical management, identifying a subset of HIT-patients who are at high risk of developing thromboembolic complications and possibly require alternative anticoagulation in therapeutic dosage even in the context of isolated HIT.     

Low prevalence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia after cardiac surgery in Thai patients

Introduction

Heparin induced-thrombocytopenia (HIT) has been well recognized in Western countries. However, there are no data in the Thai population. We therefore investigated the prevalence of anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin antibodies, HIT, and its thrombotic complications in Thai patients undergoing cardiac surgery using unfractionated heparin.

Materials and methods

Seventy-three consecutive patients were prospectively enrolled in this study. Blood samples before operation and week 1, week 2, and week 3 after operation were collected from each patient for HIT antibody screening by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using IgG antibody specific to the PF4/heparin complex. Positive samples were further analyzed by ¹⁴C-serotonin release assay. Complete blood count was performed daily during the first week, then weekly for 3 weeks.

Results

No patient had detectable anti-PF4/heparin antibodies at baseline. Five patients sero-converted during the course of the study for anti-PF4/heparin IgG: 3 (4.1%) at week 1, 4 (5.5%) at week 2, and 5 (6.8%) at week 3 after surgery. However, none of these patients had anti-PF4/heparin antibodies that resulted in ¹⁴C-serotonin release to be considered clinically significant antibodies. Post-operative thrombocytopenia after the operation was found in 35 patients (47.9%), but was not considered to be caused by HIT. Thromboembolic events occurred in 3 patients (4.1%) during follow up; however, none of these patients had positive PF4/heparin antibody tests.

Conclusions

Our study represents the first study to examine Thai patients exposed to heparin in the context of cardiac surgery. We found a lower prevalence of positive anti-PF4/heparin antibodies and clinical HIT than previously published studies.     

New insights in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia by the use of fluid-phase assays to detect specifically platelet factor 4/heparin complex antibodies and antibody-secreting cells

Introduction

The key feature of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is the production of antibodies (Ab) against the platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin complex. These Ab are directed against neoepitopes of the PF4 tetramer, which are induced by the complex formation with heparin. To study this humoral immune response in greater detail, either in a murine immunization model or in human blood samples, reliable and specific immune assays to detect specifically Ab against the PF4/heparin complexes, but not PF4 alone are required.

Materials and Methods

We established fluid-phase enzyme-immunoassays in which the soluble biotinylated antigen, PF4/heparin, is firstly captured by specific Ab, and secondly directly detected with enzyme-conjugated streptavidin.

Results

The use of this fluid-phase principle allowed a higher specificity than the traditional solid-phase enzyme-immunoassays in terms of Ab binding to murine PF4/heparin compared to murine PF4 alone. This fluid-phase approach applied to the detection of specific murine PF4/heparin Ab-secreting cells (ASC) identified the spleen as the main lymphatic organ that contributes to the PF4/heparin Ab response in mice. IgG ASC specific for PF4/heparin are very transiently detectable in mice, which might explain why anti-PF4/heparin IgG Ab typically disappear within 100 days in humans. Furthermore, this fluid-phase approach was successfully transferred to detect human PF4/heparin-specific Ab.

Conclusion

The fluid-phase principle for the specific detection of anti-PF4/heparin IgG and IgM Ab enables new and improved assays for HIT research in men and mice. At least in mice PF4/heparin antibodies are produced by transient B cells.     

Disruption of PF4/H multimolecular complex formation with a minimally anticoagulant heparin (ODSH)

Recent studies have shown that ultra-large complexes (ULCs) of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin (H) play an essential role in the pathogenesis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), an immune-mediated disorder caused by PF4/H antibodies. Because antigenic PF4/H ULCs assemble through non-specific electrostatic interactions, we reasoned that disruption of charge-based interactions can modulate the immune response to antigen. We tested a minimally anticoagulant compound (2-O, 3-O desulfated heparin, ODSH) with preserved charge to disrupt PF4/H complex formation and immunogenicity. We show that ODSH disrupts complexes when added to pre-formed PF4/H ULCs and prevents ULC formation when incubated simultaneously with PF4 and UFH. In other studies, we show that excess ODSH reduces HIT antibody (Ab) binding in immunoassays and that PF4/ODSH complexes do not cross-react with HIT Abs. When ODSH and unfractionated heparin (UFH) are mixed at equimolar concentrations, we show that there is a negligible effect on amount of protamine required for heparin neutralisation and reduced immunogenicity of PF4/UFH in the presence of ODSH. Taken together, these studies suggest that ODSH can be used concurrently with UFH to disrupt PF4/H charge interactions and provides a novel strategy to reduce antibody mediated complications in HIT.     

Physiological changes in membrane-expressed platelet factor 4: Implications in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Background

Many heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) antibodies cause platelet activation in the serotonin release assay (SRA) in the absence of heparin. This in vitro observation may help unravel the mechanism of delayed-onset HIT, where seropositive patients develop thrombocytopenia and associated thrombosis after cessation of heparin.

Objective

Studies were conducted to examine the relationship between platelet environment, surface PF4 expression, and the extent of heparin-independent platelet activation in the SRA.

Methods

Ex vivo platelets were washed and labeled for SRA, then used either before or after 45 minutes of recovery at 37 °C. HIT antibody-mediated serotonin release in the absence of heparin was compared to the extent of surface staining of the platelets with fluorescent anti-human PF4 antibodies.

Results

Handling of platelets for in vitro studies resulted in transient expression of surface PF4, and it was during this interval that platelets were most sensitive to activation by HIT antibodies in the absence of heparin. Heparin-independent platelet activation was attenuated when SRA-positive specimens were retested after platelets were incubated 45 minutes at 37 °C. Surface PF4 expression was diminished on the rested platelets, compared to the same platelets labeled immediately after handling. Thus compared to rested platelets, mildly activated platelets had elevated surface PF4 expression and a higher level of HIT antibody-mediated, heparin-independent platelet activation.

Conclusion

Surface expression of PF4 reflects HIT antigen presentation, and varies with the physiological state of platelets. Thus there can be differences in HIT antibody target availability among patients which may explain the variability in consequences of HIT antibody seropositivity.     

Anti-heparin/platelet factor 4 antibody optical density values and the confirmatory procedure in the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Laboratory testing for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) includes the highly sensitive, though less specific, heparin/platelet factor 4 (PF4) ELISA. A confirmatory test with excess heparin is routinely performed on positive ELISA results to improve test specificity; the significance of a negative confirmatory result is unknown. The aim was firstly to evaluate the clinical utility of the PF4 ELISA confirmatory assay, secondly to examine the relationship between ELISA optical density (OD) value and clinical diagnosis of HIT, and thirdly to assess current practice at a tertiary care medical centre regarding patients with anti-heparin/PF4 antibodies. Patients with anti-heparin/PF4 antibodies detected by commercial ELISA during 2005 were identified. A confirmatory test was performed on positive ELISA results. Patients were labeled confirmatory positive (confirm+) or confirmatory negative (confirm-). Patients were classified as HIT+ (met criteria for HIT), HIT? (HIT possible), and HIT- (did not meet criteria for HIT) utilizing ACCP guidelines. One hundred fifteen patients with anti-heparin/PF4 antibodies were identified. Ninety-eight patients were confirm+; 17 were confirm-. The majority of confirm+ patients were HIT+ or HIT?(72%); the majority of confirm- patients were HIT-(81%). Patients who were HIT+/confirm+ had higher ELISA OD values than patients who were HIT?/confirm+ or HIT-/confirm+ (p = 0.031, p = 0.001). Two confirm- patients were HIT+, one was HIT?; all had high ELISA OD values. Although confirm+ status correlated with clinical HIT, the confirmatory procedure misclassified some patients by yielding a confirm- result despite clinical HIT with high ELISA OD values. Future studies should compare higher ELISA OD values with the confirmatory procedure as strategies to improve ELISA diagnostic specificity for HIT.     

First workshop for detection of heparin-induced antibodies: validation of the heparin-induced platelet-activation test (HIPA) in comparison with a PF4/heparin ELISA

BACKGROUND: No data exist regarding the inter-laboratory reproducibility of the heparin-induced-platelet-activation (HIPA) test, the most widely used functional assay in Germany for the detection of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) antibodies. METHODS: Nine laboratories used an identical protocol to test eight different sera with the HIPA test. Five laboratories also tested the sera with a platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin-complex ELISA. Cross-reactivity with danaparoid-sodium was assessed using 0.2 aFXa units instead of heparin in the HIPA test. RESULTS: Two of nine laboratories had no discrepant HIPA test results. Four laboratories differed in one sample, one reported two discrepant results, and two laboratories reported more than two discrepant results. Cross-reactivity with danaparoid-sodium test results differed among laboratories. PF4/heparin ELISA results were identical in all five laboratories. CONCLUSION: The HIPA test requires strict quality control measures. Using both a sensitive functional assay (HIPA test) and a PF4/heparin ELISA will allow detection of antibodies directed to antigens other than PF4/heparin complexes as well as detection of IgM and IgA antibodies with PF4/heparin specificity.     

Performance characteristics of two commercially available IgG-specific immunoassays in the assessment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT)

Background

The in vitro demonstration of antibodies against platelet factor-4/heparin (PF4/hep) complexes is an important contribution to the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). The use of PF4/hep IgG-specific immunoassays enhances the specificity of HIT-investigations without any impairment of the sensitivity. Several IgG-specific immunoassays with different origin and structure of the target antigen-complex are commercially available.

Methods

Using a retrospective cohort consisting of 459 patients suspected to have HIT, we compared the performance characteristics of two commercially available IgG-specific immunoassays, GTI- (Genetic Testing Institute) and HIA-IgG-ELISA (Hyphen Biomed Research).

Results

PF4/hep antibodies were detected in 85 and 81 sera using GTI- and HIA-IgG-ELISA, respectively. OD values and clinical likelihood of patients who tested positive in one assay only were significantly lower than in those who tested positive in both immunoassays. Both IgG-specific assays showed high negative predictive values (100%) and similar but unsatisfactory positive predictive values, determined by a minimum clinical score of 5 and a positive HIPA result (41% and 43%, respectively). The implementation of a confirmatory step using excessive heparin increased the PPV of both assays, but results in a reduction of NPV in HIA-IgG-ELISA.

Conclusions

The detection of IgG antibodies alone improves the clinical usefulness of immunoassays. However, functional assays remain indispensable to avoid the overdiagnosis of HIT caused by the detection of IgG non-platelet activating antibodies. The OD value in IgG immunoassays appears to correlate with the clinical relevance of the antibodies and might be used as a predictive parameter in the assessment of HIT.     

A review of 122 published outcomes of danaparoid anticoagulation for intermittent haemodialysis

One hundred and twenty-two case reports of treatment outcomes of danaparoid use for intermittent haemodialysis (HD) in severely ill patients with heparin intolerance (including 97 HIT patients) have been analysed. HD sessions of 4 - 6 hours were successfully conducted daily to 3 times/week for periods of up to 4 years (median 7 sessions/patient (range 1 - > 650). In these patients danaparoid use was relatively safe (4 unprovoked non-fatal major bleeds) and efficacious in protecting the circuit (95% no clotting problem) or patient (6 thromboses: 4 fatal or leading to danaparoid discontinuation).HIT diagnosis was improved if recurrent platelet count reduction with each HD and circuit/AV graft clotting were included. Alternative reasons for and very low nadirs of the platelet count undermined the usefulness of the 4T pre-test HIT predictability scores, but a positive functional serological test confirmed HIT in most patients.Deaths (15.6%) and thrombosis only occurred in HIT cases. Possible reasons are discussed. Replacing the standard intermittent pre-HD dose regimen with the therapeutic infusion regimen to provide continuous daily systemic antithrombotic protection, should further improve efficacy.

Conclusion

Danaparoid appears to be a useful alternative antithrombotic for patients with heparin intolerance and renal failure requiring haemodialysis.     

The prevalence of antibodies to the platelet factor 4 -heparin complex and association with access thrombosis in patients on chronic hemodialysis

INTRODUCTION: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is a serious complication that can lead to thrombocytopenia, venous and arterial thrombosis. Patients with this disorder develop antibodies to the platelet factor 4-heparin (PF4-H) complex. Hemodialysis patients are repeatedly exposed to heparin and are at risk for developing PF4-H antibodies. We sought to determine the prevalence of PF4-H antibodies in a large cohort of patients on chronic hemodialysis and to evaluate the relationship between PF4-H antibodies and hemodialysis vascular access thrombosis in a case-control study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Pre-dialysis blood samples were drawn on 419 patients; 107 cases with access thrombosis and 312 controls that never had access thrombosis. All samples were screened for PF4-H antibodies using an ELISA assay (GTI PF4 Enhanced, GTI Diagnostics). All positive and indeterminate samples were then tested using an IgG-specific PF4-H ELISA assay and a platelet serotonin-release assay. RESULTS: Antibodies to PF4-H were positive in 54 (12.9%) patients using the screening ELISA assay. Nine (2.1%) patients had IgG-specific PF4-H antibodies. None of the patient's had a positive platelet serotonin-release assay. No relationship between hemodialysis access thrombosis and PF4-H antibodies was noted using the screening ELISA assay (unadjusted odds ratio 0.63; 95% CI 0.30-1.30; P = 0.21), the IgG-specific ELISA assay (unadjusted odds ratio 0.83; 95% CI 0.17-4.06; P = 0.82) or indeterminate platelet serotonin-release assay results (unadjusted odds ratio 0.97;95% CI 0.10-9.44;P = 0.98). CONCLUSIONS: Hemodialysis with repeated exposure to unfractionated heparin was associated with a moderately elevated prevalence of PF4-H antibodies. However, our results do not support a relationship between PF4-H antibodies and hemodialysis vascular access thrombosis.     

Treatment of 51 pregnancies with danaparoid because of heparin intolerance

Pregnant patients with acute venous thrombosis or a history of thrombosis may need alternative anticoagulation, when heparin intolerance occurs. Only limited data on the use of the heparinoid danaparoid are available in literature. We reviewed the use of danaparoid in 51 pregnancies of 49 patients identified in literature between 1981 and 2004. All patients had developed heparin intolerance (32 due to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, 19 mainly due to heparin-induced skin rashes) and had a current and/or past history of thromboembolic complications. The initial danaparoid dose regimens ranged from 1000 to 7500 U/day administered s.c. or i.v.. The median duration of danaparoid use was 10 weeks. Danaparoid was used until delivery of a healthy infant in 37 pregnancies. In the remaining 14 pregnancies it was stopped earlier, because anticoagulant treatment was no longer required (3/14) or an adverse event led to a treatment discontinuation (11/14). Four maternal bleeding events were recorded during pregnancy, delivery or postpartum, two of them were fatal due to placental problems. Three fetal deaths were recorded, all associated with maternal complications antedating danaparoid use. Danaparoid cross-reactivity was suspected in 4 HIT patients and 5 non-HIT patients with skin reactions and was confirmed serologically in one of the two HIT patients tested. In none of five fetal cord blood- and three maternal breast milksamples anti-Xa activity transfer was observed. In conclusion danaparoid can be used as an alternative antithrombotic agent in pregnant women with high thrombotic risk and intolerance to heparins.     

Polymorphonuclear leukocyte and monocyte activation induced by plasma from patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in whole blood

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), a severe complication of heparin therapy, results from platelet activation by heparin-dependent antibodies. Previously, we have shown that plasma from patients with HIT (HIT plasma) induces leukocyteplatelet aggregation in blood. In this report, we examined leukocyte activation by HIT plasma and the contribution of heparin and platelets to this activation, in whole blood. Degranulation of leukocytes from HIT patients was evaluated as a leukocyte activation marker. We showed that polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMN) and monocytes were the leukocyte subpopulations involved in platelet-leukocyte aggregation induced by HIT plasma in healthy donor blood. PMN and monocyte activation, reflected by increased surface expression of the CD11b adhesion molecule, was induced by HIT plasma in a heparin-dependent manner. The CD11b increase induced by HIT plasma was observed on PMN only when they were associated with platelets. Moreover, the increased CD11b expression on monocytes and PMN correlated strongly with the degree of platelet adhesion to these cells. Degranulation of leukocytes from HIT patients and control subjects (non-HIT heparin-treated patients and healthy subjects) was evaluated in vivo by measuring the plasma myeloperoxidase concentration. HIT plasma contained higher myeloperoxidase concentrations than control plasma, suggesting leukocyte degranulation during HIT. In conclusion, this study provides the first evidence that PMN activation is induced by HIT plasma. HIT plasma induced PMN and monocyte activation in a heparin-dependent manner. In whole blood, platelet association with monocytes and PMN, and the activation of these leukocytes by HIT plasma were interrelated. Finally, leukocyte degranulation could be involved in HIT physiopathology.     

Rapid exclusion of the diagnosis of immune HIT by AcuStar HIT and heparin-induced multiple electrode aggregometry

Background

Accurate diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is essential but remains challenging. We have previously demonstrated, in a retrospective study, the usefulness of the combination of the 4Ts score, AcuStar HIT and heparin-induced multiple electrode aggregometry (HIMEA) with optimized thresholds.

Objectives

We aimed at exploring prospectively the performances of our optimized diagnostic algorithm on suspected HIT patients. The secondary objective is to evaluate performances of AcuStar HIT-Ab (PF4-H) in comparison with the clinical outcome.

Methods

116 inpatients with clinically suspected immune HIT were included. Our optimized diagnostic algorithm was applied to each patient. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV) of the overall diagnostic strategy as well as AcuStar HIT-Ab (at manufacturer’s thresholds and at our thresholds) were calculated using clinical diagnosis as the reference.

Results

Among 116 patients, 2 patients had clinically-diagnosed HIT. These 2 patients were positive on AcuStar HIT-Ab, AcuStar HIT-IgG and HIMEA. Using our optimized algorithm, all patients were correctly diagnosed. AcuStar HIT-Ab at our cut-off (> 9.41 U/mL) and at manufacturer’s cut-off (> 1.00 U/mL) showed both a sensitivity of 100.0% and a specificity of 99.1% and 90.4%, respectively.

Conclusion

The combination of the 4Ts score, the HemosIL® AcuStar HIT and HIMEA with optimized thresholds may be useful for the rapid and accurate exclusion of the diagnosis of immune HIT.     

Evaluation of a new nanoparticle-based lateral-flow immunoassay for the exclusion of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT)

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an adverse complication of heparin caused by HIT antibodies (abs) that recognise platelet factor 4-heparin (PF4/hep) complexes. Several laboratory tests are available for the confirmation and/or refutation of HIT. A reliable and rapid single-sample test is still pending. It was the objective of this study to evaluate a new lateral-flow immunoassay based on nanoparticle technology. A cohort of 452 surgical and medical patients suspected of having HIT was evaluated. All samples were tested in two IgG-specific ELISAs, in a particle gel immunoassay (PaGIA) and in a newly developed lateral-flow immunoassay (LFI-HIT) as well as in a functional test (HIPA). Clinical pre-test probability was determined using 4T's score. Platelet-activating antibodies were present in 34/452 patients, all of whom had intermediate to high clinical probability. PF4/hep abs were detected in 79, 87, 86, and 63 sera using the four different immunoassays. The negative predictive values (NPV) were 100% for both ELISA tests and LFI-HIT but only 99.2% for PaGIA. There were less false positives (n=29) in the LFI-HIT compared to any other test. Additionally, significantly less time was required to perform LFI-HIT than to perform the other immunoassays. In conclusion, a newly developed lateral-flow assay, LFI-HIT, was capable of identifying all HIT patients in a cohort in a short period of time. Beside an NPV of 100%, the rate of false-positive signals is significantly lower with LFI-HIT than with other immunoassay(s). These performance characteristics suggest a high potency in reducing the risk and costs in patients suspected of having HIT.