Embryo implantation and GnRH antagonists: GnRH antagonists do not activate the GnRH receptor

Recent suggestions that gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists activate the GnRH receptor are discussed. Most of the studies cited in support of this suggestion are in-vitro studies, testing supra-pharmacological doses of GnRH analogues in cancer cell lines, whereas GnRH antagonists, e.g. ganirelix or cetrorelix, do not affect the steroidogenesis of human granulosa cells in vitro. In patients treated with GnRH antagonists prior to IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), oocyte maturity and fertilization rates are equal to those achieved following a long protocol of GnRH agonists. Although there is a tendency towards a lower pregnancy rate (not statistically significant) in the initial trials using GnRH antagonist with either recombinant FSH or human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) for ovarian stimulation, this new treatment option of GnRH antagonists facilitates short and simple treatment and improves the convenience and safety for the patient. As with GnRH agonists in the past, the clinical outcome of GnRH antagonist treatment will improve with time as more clinical experience is gained (learning curve) and the treatment protocol is optimized. Moreover, a GnRH agonist instead of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) may be used for triggering ovulation and will decrease the cancellation rate and minimize the risk for developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS).     

Treatment with the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist ganirelix in women undergoing ovarian stimulation with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone is effective, safe and convenient: results of a controlled, randomized, multicentre trial. The European Orgalutran Study Group

A multicentre, open-label, randomized study of the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist ganirelix (Orgalutran((R))/Antagon((TM))) was performed in women undergoing ovarian stimulation with recombinant FSH (rFSH: Puregon((R))). The study was designed as a non-inferiority study using a long protocol of buserelin (intranasal) and rFSH as a reference treatment. A total of 730 subjects was randomized in a treatment ratio of 2:1 (ganirelix:buserelin) using an interactive voice response system which stratified for age, type of infertility and planned fertilization procedure [IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)]. The median duration of GnRH analogue treatment was 5 days in the ganirelix group and 26 days in the buserelin group, whereas the median total rFSH dose was 1500 IU and 1800 IU respectively. In addition, in the ganirelix group the mean duration of stimulation was 1 day shorter. During ganirelix treatment the incidence of LH rises (LH >/=10 IU/l) was 2.8% versus 1.3% during rFSH stimulation in the buserelin group. On the day of triggering ovulation by human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG), the mean number of follicles >/=11 mm diameter was 10.7 and 11.8, and the median serum oestradiol concentrations were 1190 pg/ml and 1700 pg/ml in the ganirelix and buserelin groups respectively. The mean number of oocytes per retrieval was 9.1 and 10.4 respectively, whereas the mean number of good quality embryos was 3.3 and 3.5 respectively. The fertilization rate was equal in both groups (62.1%), and the same mean number of embryos (2.2) was replaced. The mean implantation rates were 15.7% and 21.8%, and the ongoing pregnancy rates per attempt were 20.3% and 25.7% in the ganirelix and buserelin groups respectively. Evaluation of all safety data indicated that the ganirelix regimen was safe and well tolerated. The overall incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome was 2.4% in the ganirelix group and 5.9% in the reference group. The results of this study support a safe, short and convenient treatment regimen of ganirelix, resulting in a good clinical outcome for patients undergoing ovarian stimulation for IVF or ICSI.     

Induction of ovulation after gnRH antagonists

The gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist binds competitively to the receptors and thereby prevents endogenous GnRH from exerting its stimulatory effect on the pituitary cells. This causes suppression of gonadotrophin secretion which occurs immediately after administration of the antagonist. When using GnRH antagonist in controlled ovarian stimulation, ovulation or maturation of the oocyte can, therefore, be induced by a variety of drugs, e.g. native GnRH, recombinant LH or short-acting GnRH agonists. Short-acting GnRH agonists were recommended for triggering ovulation in cases with a high risk of developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Since it is evident that GnRH is required to initiate the LH surge and the oestradiol rise, a single administration of GnRH antagonist during the late follicular phase delays the LH surge. Studies showed that a single s.c. administration of 3 or 5 mg of Cetrorelix in the late follicular stage was sufficient to prevent the LH surge for 617 days. This phenomenon can be used in high responder patients who are prone to OHSS. The question whether this delay has any effect on oocyte quality and maturation still remains unanswered. Overall, there are four uses for GnRH antagonist: (i) using short-acting GnRH agonists for triggering ovulation in cases in which the GnRH antagonist is part of the protocol for ovarian stimulation. Recombinant LH and native LHRH could also be used as triggers of LH surge; (ii) delaying the LH surge in cases prone to OHSS by treatment with GnRH antagonist; (iii) to administer GnRH antagonist during the luteal phase to decrease the activity of corpora lutea; (iv) in polycystic ovarian disease with elevated LH the LH/FSH ratio can be corrected with the injection of GnRH antagonist prior to and during ovarian stimulation.     

Triggering of ovulation in human menopausal gonadotrophin-stimulated cycles: comparison between intravenously administered gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (100 and 500 {micro}g), GnRH agonist (buserelin, 500 {micro}g) and human chorionic gonadotrophin (10 000 IU)

We studied the peri-ovulatory and luteal phases in 38 humanmenopausal gonadotrophin (HMG)-stimulated cycles, in which ovulationwas triggered with four different i.v. bolus ovulation triggers:100 µg gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH; group A,n = 9), 500 µg GnRH agonist (GnRHa; group B, n = 10),10 000IU human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG; group C, n = 10)and 500 µg GnRH (group D, n = 9). Endogenous luteinizinghormone (LH) surges occurred in all cycles of groups A, B andD. The rise was slowest but highest in group B (P < 0.0001)and lowest in group A. Although the t₀ serum oestradiol valueswere similar in all groups, day +8 oestradiol and day +4 and+8 progesterone concentrations were higher in group C (P <0.05). At day +4 and +8, serum LH concentrations were lowest(P < 0.01) but follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) concentrationswere higher. Clinically, day +8 luteal scores showed a moreconspicuous degree of ovarian hyperstimulation in the HCG group(P = 0.0292). Luteal insufficiency, defined as cycles with progesteroneconcentrations of <8 ng/ml, occurred much more frequentlyin groups A, B and D than in group C (day +4: P < 0.0003;day +8: P < 0.0001), despite progesterone supplementation.Three pregnancies (one in group C and two in group D) and onemoderate case of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) (ina non-conceptional group D cycle) occurred. These findings showthat (i) ovulation occurs and pregnancy can be achieved followingan endogenous LH surge induced by GnRH and its agonists, (ii)a high frequency of luteal insufficiency occurs in such cycleseven with luteal supplementation and (iii) OHSS cannot be totallyprevented by this approach, although cycles with an endogenousLH surge in general result in fewer subclinical signs of ovarianhyperstimulation.     

The use of GnRH antagonists in ovarian stimulation

GnRH antagonists induce a rapid decrease in LH and FSH, preventing and interrupting LH surges. Their properties do not require a desensitization period, and this allows their use in the late follicular phase. GnRH antagonists could replace GnRH agonists in controlled ovarian stimulation without their side-effects and their long desensitization period. Two protocols for assisted reproduction technology (ART) cycles were designed: the single-dose protocol allies simplicity and efficacy, while the multiple-dose protocol is efficient and could reduce monitoring of the cycle, though compliance is mandatory. A review of the available literature on GnRH antagonists in ART cycles is presented, focusing on phase III controlled trials and ART results. Both protocols using GnRH antagonists were associated with the need for a smaller dose of gonadotrophin, a shorter stimulation period and a lower incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), albeit with statistically comparable pregnancy rates. A trend is observed in all studies showing a lower pregnancy rates in GnRH antagonist cycles as compared with GnRH agonist cycles. The role of the lower number of embryos, and the potential adverse effects of GnRH antagonists on endometrium or follicle must be studied. More cycles using GnRH antagonists are necessary to confirm their equivalent pregnancy rates. There is room for improvement in both protocols with regard to scheduling, antagonist dose level and the timing of its administration. Until further studies have been conducted, luteal support seems to remain mandatory. Perinatal outcome appears similar to that with other stimulation regimens. Triggering of ovulation can be obtained with GnRH agonist for patients at risk of OHSS. With regard to GnRH antagonists, questions remain regarding pregnancy rates, the indications of their use in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome or poor responders, and in ovarian stimulation outside IVF.     

GnRH agonist for triggering final oocyte maturation in the GnRH antagonist ovarian hyperstimulation protocol: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Triggering final oocyte maturation with GnRH agonist during ovarian stimulation is feasible when inhibition of premature LH surge is performed with GnRH antagonists, and we aimed to systematically collate evidence on the clinical efficacy of GnRH agonist triggering in patients undergoing assisted reproduction in GnRH antagonist protocols. Twenty-three publications were identified by a comprehensive literature search that included PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library. Three publications out of 23 fulfilled the inclusion criteria for meta-analysis, which were (i) prospective, randomized controlled study design; (ii) stimulation with gonadotropins for induction of multifollicular development; (iii) suppression of endogenous LH by a GnRH antagonist; (iv) triggering of final oocyte maturation with GnRH agonist; (v) control group randomized to receive HCG for final oocyte maturation and (vi) any means of luteal phase support other than HCG. The participants were normoovulatory women undergoing IVF. The outcomes assessed were clinical pregnancy per randomized patient; number of oocytes retrieved; proportion of metaphase II oocytes; fertilization rate; embryo quality score; first trimester abortion rate; ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) incidence. Results are presented as combined standardized differences of the mean and combined odds ratios, as appropriate, with 95% confidence intervals. No significant difference was found for the number of oocytes retrieved (-0.94, -0.33-0.14), proportion of metaphase II oocytes (-0.03, -0.58-0.52), fertilization rate (0.15, -0.09-0.38) or embryo quality score (0.05, -0.18-0.29). No OHSS occurred in two of the studies, whereas in one study OHSS incidence was not reported. Thus from the available data, no conclusion can be drawn as regards OHSS incidence after GnRH agonist triggering. In comparison to HCG, GnRH agonist administration is associated with a significantly reduced likelihood of achieving a clinical pregnancy (0.21, 0.05-0.84; P = 0.03). The odds of first trimester pregnancy loss is increased after GnRH agonist triggering; however, the confidence interval crosses unity (11.51, 0.95-138.98; P = 0.05). In conclusion, the use of GnRH agonist to trigger final oocyte maturation in IVF, where inhibition of premature LH surge is achieved with GnRH antagonists, yields a number of oocytes capable to undergo fertilization and subsequent embryonic cleavage, which is comparable to that achieved with HCG. However, the likelihood of an ongoing clinical pregnancy after GnRH agonist triggering is significantly lower as compared to standard HCG treatment.     

GnRH antagonist in assisted reproduction: a Cochrane review

BACKGROUND: In the present systematic review, we wished to compare the efficacy of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist and GnRH agonist administration for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in assisted conception. METHODS: Five randomized controlled trials fulfilled the inclusion criteria. In four studies, the multiple low-dose (0.25 mg) antagonist regimen was applied and, in one study, the single high-dose (3 mg) antagonist regimen was investigated. In all trials, reference treatment included a long protocol of GnRH agonist (buserelin, leuprorelin or triptorelin) starting in the mid-luteal phase of the preceding cycle. RESULTS: In comparison with the long protocol of GnRH agonist, the overall odds ratio for the prevention of premature LH surges was 1.76 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.75-4.16], which was not statistically significant. There were significantly fewer clinical pregnancies in those treated with GnRH antagonists (OR 0.79; 95% CI 0.63-0.99). There was no statistically significant reduction in incidence of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome between the two regimens (relative risk 0.51; OR 0.79; 95% CI 0.22-1.18). CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that the fixed GnRH antagonist protocol is a short and simple protocol with good clinical outcome, but the lower pregnancy rate compared with the GnRH agonist long protocol and the non-significant difference between both protocols regarding prevention of premature LH surge and prevention of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome necessitates counselling subfertile couples before recommending change from GnRH agonist to antagonist. The clinical outcome may be further improved by developing more flexible antagonist regimens, taking into account individual patient characteristics.     

Triggering ovulation with endogenous luteinizing hormone may prevent the ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

In a series of 126 therapeutic cycles in 48 patients with primary infertility and treated with HMG for anovulation or preparation to insemination, ovulation was triggered by endogenous LH instead of HCG when the patient was considered to be at high risk for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHS), (plasma oestradiol greater than 1200 pg/ml) and/or multiple pregnancy (greater than 3 follicles greater than 17 mm in diameter). The endogenous LH surge was provoked and maintained by intranasal buserelin 200 micrograms three times at 8-hourly intervals. In the 37 cycles with buserelin, no OHS occurred despite high preovulatory levels of oestradiol; a single twin pregnancy was recorded despite the presence of numerous mature preovulatory follicles. Conception results (21.6% pregnancy per therapeutic cycle) compared favourably with HCG administration (16.8%). It is concluded that, when ovulation must be triggered in a hazardous situation, the use of endogenous LH through the administration of a short-acting GnRH analogue prevents the complications of exaggerated follicular stimulation.     

Embryo implantation and GnRH antagonists: ovarian actions of GnRH antagonists

The gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists, cetrorelix and ganirelix, have both been approved for ovarian stimulation to prevent a premature LH surge. Since GnRH receptors and their gene expression have been detected in human ovary, concern has risen over whether GnRH antagonists might affect ovarian function. Three large trials which compared GnRH agonists (used in the standard protocol worldwide), with the new antagonist treatment found no significant differences concerning the most important goals, e.g. pregnancy rate, fertilization and quality of oocytes. However, the concentration of oestradiol, and the pregnancy and implantation rates were lower in GnRH antagonist-treated patients. These findings again fuelled the debate about the possible extrapituitary effects of GnRH antagonists. Here, we review the conflicting data in the literature on the ovarian effects of GnRH antagonists and discuss our own results. In our view, it is unlikely that GnRH antagonists have a relevant impact on ovarian steroidogenesis and function; however, GnRH antagonists may exert other effects on the ovary.     

Ganirelix acetate causes a rapid reduction in estradiol levels without adversely affecting oocyte maturation in women pretreated with leuprolide acetate who are at risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

BACKGROUND: Elevated estradiol (E(2)) levels predispose to development of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Since GnRH antagonist is associated with a reduction in E(2) levels, we hypothesized that GnRH-antagonist treatment of women down-regulated with GnRH agonist who are at risk of OHSS might reduce E(2) levels and avoid cycle cancellation. METHODS: Retrospective study in a university-based assisted reproduction technology (ART) programme in 87 patients treated with long luteal (LL) or microdose flare (MDF) with ovarian hyperresponse and 87 control patients without ovarian hyperresponse. GnRH-antagonist (ganirelix acetate) treatment was started and leuprolide acetate discontinued in women who failed to respond to a reduction in gonadotrophin dosage. RESULTS: In the treatment group, there was a significant, reproducible reduction in serum E(2) levels. Mean E(2) at the start of ganirelix treatment was 4219.8 pg/ml and decreased in 24 h to 2613.7 pg/ml (36.7%; P < 0.001). An average of 24.9 +/- 8.8 oocytes were obtained at retrieval and an average of 19.1 +/- 8.0 were metaphase II (79.2%). Fertilization occurred in 13.9 +/- 8.1 embryos (72.8%). In this high risk group, two cases of severe OHSS (2.3%) occurred. The ongoing pregnancy rate was 51.8%. Compared with the control group, there were no statistically significant differences in the rate of oocyte recovery, oocyte maturity, 2PN rate, fertilization, cancellation, OHSS or pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: GnRH-antagonist treatment of women pretreated with GnRH agonist rapidly reduced circulating serum E(2) without adversely affecting oocyte maturation, fertilization rates or embryo quality and resulted in a high pregnancy rate in this subgroup of patients at risk of OHSS.     

Serum inhibin A, VEGF and TNFalpha levels after triggering oocyte maturation with GnRH agonist compared with HCG in women with polycystic ovaries undergoing IVF treatment: a prospective randomized trial

BACKGROUND: We aimed to examine the serum levels of inhibin A, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha), estradiol (E2) and progesterone levels after triggering of final oocyte maturation with GnRH agonist compared with HCG in patients with polycystic ovaries (PCO) and to investigate the relationship between these markers and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). METHODS: Twenty-eight patients with PCO, undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with FSH and GnRH antagonist for IVF-embryo transfer treatment, were randomized for triggering of final oocyte maturation with GnRH agonist (GnRH agonist group, n = 15) or HCG (HCG group, n = 13). Blood samples were obtained on the day of randomization and thereafter every 2-7 days. Serum levels of inhibin A, VEGF, TNFalpha, E2 and progesterone, the incidence of OHSS, ovarian size and pelvic fluid accumulation were evaluated. RESULTS: Serum inhibin A, E2 and progesterone levels were significantly lower in the GnRH agonist group compared with the HCG group, particularly on the day of embryo transfer (P < 0.0001). Serum VEGF and TNFalpha levels were similar between the two groups. Four patients in the HCG group developed severe OHSS, whereas no patient had any symptoms or signs of OHSS in the GnRH-agonist group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with PCO treated with FSH/GnRH antagonist, final oocyte maturation with GnRH agonist instead of HCG reduces significantly inhibin A, E2 and progesterone levels during the luteal phase. This phenomenon reflects the inhibition of the corpus luteum function and may explain, at least in part, the mechanism of OHSS prevention in high-risk patients. Our results do not support a crucial role for VEGF or TNFalpha in OHSS.     

Severe OHSS: yes, there is a strategy to prevent it!

Effective measures to prevent ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) remain controversial. It became almost 'common knowledge' that there is no strategy that may completely prevent OHSS. Extensive clinical experience (albeit not derived from prospective randomized studies) clearly documents the ability of a single administration of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist to effectively trigger ovulation, while completely eliminating any threat of clinically significant OHSS. This strategy cannot be used if the pituitary is down-regulated (as is the case in most assisted reproductive cycles today), however, the newly-introduced GnRH antagonists open new opportunities for implementing this strategy, since the pituitary preserves its responsiveness to GnRH agonists. Combining GnRH antagonist-based ovarian stimulation (particularly in 'high responders'), with GnRH agonist-driven ovulation triggering will make severe OHSS a disease of the past in assisted reproduction.     

Elective cryopreservation of all pronuclear oocytes after GnRH agonist triggering of final oocyte maturation in patients at risk of developing OHSS: a prospective, observational proof-of-concept study

BACKGROUND: A bolus dose of GnRH agonist can substitute for hCG as a trigger for the resumption of meiosis in ovarian stimulation with GnRH antagonists, which has been suggested to reduce the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). As the efficacy of this measure in fresh embryo transfer (ET) cycles is unclear, we evaluated a new clinical concept of GnRH-agonist triggering. METHODS: In this prospective, observational proof-of-concept study, 20 patients considered at increased risk of developing OHSS (> or = 20 follicles > or = 10 mm or estradiol > or = 4000 pg/ml, or a history of cycle cancellation due to OHSS risk or the development of severe OHSS in a previous cycle) after ovarian stimulation and concomitant GnRH-antagonist administration had final oocyte maturation triggered with 0.2 mg triptorelin s.c. All two pronucleate (2 PN) oocytes were cryopreserved by vitrification, and frozen-thawed ETs (FT-ETs) were performed in an artificial cycle. Main outcome measures were the cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate per patient and the ongoing pregnancy rate per first ET. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of moderate-to-severe OHSS. RESULTS: Of the 20 patients triggered with GnRH agonist, 19 patients underwent 24 FT-ETs in the observational period. The cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate was 36.8% (95% confidence interval: 19.1-59.0%). The ongoing pregnancy rate per first FT-ET was 31.6% (15.4-54.0%). No cases of moderate or severe OHSS were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The present study is the proof of the concept that GnRH-agonist triggering of final oocyte maturation in combination with elective cryopreservation of 2 PN oocytes offers OHSS risk patients a good chance of pregnancy achievement, while reducing the risk of moderate and severe OHSS.     

High dose gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist (ganirelix) may prevent ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome caused by ovarian stimulation for in-vitro fertilization

This case report describes the first attempt to treat imminent ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) by using a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist. A 33 year old, normo-ovulatory woman undergoing in-vitro fertilization received daily subcutaneous injections of 150 IU of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (recFSH) from cycle day 2, together with GnRH antagonist (ganirelix) 0.125 mg from cycle day 7 onwards. On cycle day 10 the patient was found to have a serum oestradiol concentration of 16 500 pmol/l and, on ultrasound examination, four preovulatory (>16 mm) and nine intermediate sized (10-16 mm) follicles. RecFSH injections were discontinued, human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) withheld, whereas the ganirelix dose was increased to 2 mg/d. This regimen led to a rapid decrease in serum oestradiol concentrations and the decrease in ovarian size on ultrasound. Since GnRH antagonists will become clinically available for in-vitro fertilization programmes in the near future this suggested regimen might have a role in preventing severe OHSS.      

Comparison of GnRH agonists and antagonists in assisted reproduction cycles of patients at high risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

BACKGROUND: During IVF or ICSI cycles, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a major problem. The aim of this prospective, multicentre, comparative study (using historical controls) was to assess the efficacy of a GnRH antagonist protocol in preventing OHSS in selected patients who had experienced OHSS or had been at risk of OHSS in their previous IVF/ICSI attempt. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients underwent a new cycle where the same gonadotrophin protocol was used [same dose of recombinant FSH (rFSH)] but a different protocol was used for pituitary desensitization: cetrorelix 0.25 mg multiple-dose antagonist instead of GnRH agonist long protocol. Cetrorelix 0.25 mg was administered daily, starting when the leading follicle reached a diameter of 14 mm. In other words, rFSH was administered in the new cycle according to the dosage and the step-up or step-down modalities used during the previous cycle, independently of ultrasound findings and serum estradiol (E(2)) levels. Eighty-seven patients entered the study. Out of the 87 cycles involving GnRH agonists, 49 (56.3%) were cancelled and out of the 87 involving GnRH antagonists 28 (32.2%) were cancelled [McNemar's test; 95% confidence interval (CI) -35.8% to -11.2%; P < 0.001]. After GnRH agonist cycles, we recorded 24 cases of OHSS (18 moderate and six severe; 27.6%), whereas after the GnRH antagonist cycles there were 10 cases of OHSS (nine moderate and one severe; 11.5%) (95% CI-26.4% to -5.7%; P = 0.006). There was a statistically significant reduction in the total number of follicles with a diameter >10 mm (Wilcoxon's test; Z = 6.1; P < 0.001) and of E(2) levels on the day of HCG administration (2538 versus 4322.4 pg/ml; P < 0.001) in the GnRH antagonist cycles versus GnRH agonist cycles. Twenty-nine patients had an embryo transfer in the first cycle (76.3% of oocyte retrievals) and 57 in the cycle using GnRH antagonist (96.6%). This 20.3% difference was also significant (Z-test; 95% CI 6.8-36.0%; P = 0.003). After the antagonist cycles, 18 pregnancies (20.7 per initiated cycle; 31.6% per embryo transfer) were obtained. CONCLUSIONS: Although this study presents some limitations owing to the use of historical controls, our data show a favourable effect of GnRH antagonists in reducing the incidence of OHSS and the number of assisted fertilization cycles cancelled because of the risk of OHSS in high responder patients. As a consequence, GnRH antagonist plus gonadotrophin administration could also increase the percentage of oocyte retrievals and embryo transfers in this high risk group of patients.     

FSH inhibits the augmentation by oestradiol of the pituitary responsiveness to GnRH in the female rat.

The effect of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) treatment on the pituitary response to gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) was studied in rats in various reproductive conditions. A 3-day treatment of cycling rats with FSH (Metrodin; 10 IU/injection) lowered the spontaneous pre-ovulatory. LH-surge and suppressed the pituitary luteinizing hormone (LH) response to GnRH. FSH also suppressed the LH response of pseudopregnant (PSP) rats on day 8 of pseudopregnancy, but not that of day-8 PSP rats which had been ovariectomized on day 4 (OVX-PSP rats). GnRH induced self priming in cycling, PSP and OVX-PSP rats. Oestradiol strongly augmented the pituitary LH-response to GnRH injection in PSP and OVX-PSP rats, but not in cycling rats; probably because in these latter animals the LH response to GnRH was already augmented by endogenous oestradiol. FSH suppressed the LH response to GnRH in oestradiol-treated PSP and cycling rats; in these latter rats the suppression of the LH response was as strong as that in cycling rats not treated with oestradiol. FSH did not suppress the LH response of oestradiol-treated OVX-PSP rats. The effect of FSH was not associated with changes in plasma oestradiol and progesterone concentrations. Analysis of the data revealed that FSH specifically suppressed the augmentative effect of oestradiol, but did not affect the GnRH-self priming effect. It is concluded that under the influence of FSH, the ovaries produce a factor which suppresses the augmentative effect of oestradiol on the GnRH-induced LH response of the pituitary gland. It is suggested that this effect of FSH underlies the suppression of the spontaneous LH-surges of FSH-treated cycling rats. As the present putative 'oestrogen-antagonizing factor' did not suppress the GnRH-self priming effect, it is suggested that this factor is not identical to gonadotrophin surge inhibiting factor.     

Human ovarian steroid secretion in vivo: effects of GnRH agonist versus antagonist (cetrorelix).

BACKGROUND: In order to investigate whether gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists exert a significant effect on steroid secretion in vivo compared with GnRH agonists, concentrations of sex steroid hormones (oestradiol, progesterone and testosterone) were studied in follicular fluid from women undergoing ovarian stimulation and treated with either GnRH agonist or antagonist. In addition, the correlation between follicular fluid steroid hormone concentrations and variables of follicular and oocyte development was evaluated. METHODS: Microparticle enzyme immunoassay and radioimmunoassays were used. RESULTS: The mean (SEM) follicular fluid oestradiol concentration was significantly lower in patients treated with GnRH antagonist than in those treated with GnRH agonist (542.0 +/- 76.9 versus 873.0 +/- 105.1 pg/ml, P = 0.02), which correlates with the mean serum oestradiol concentrations found in these two groups. No significant differences were found between groups in follicular fluid progesterone concentrations. Women undergoing GnRH antagonist treatment showed similar concentrations of follicular fluid testosterone compared with GnRH agonist-treated women (14.8 +/- 1.1 versus 13.3 +/- 2.7 ng/ml). The oestradiol:testosterone ratio was markedly reduced in women treated with GnRH antagonist (49.1 +/- 2.3 versus 60.1 +/- 4.4, P = 0.04). In contrast, no differences were found either in the progesterone:testosterone ratio, or in the oestradiol:progesterone ratio. CONCLUSIONS: GnRH antagonist therapy in women undergoing ovarian stimulation had a significant effect on ovarian follicular steroidogenesis.     

Prediction of over-response to ovarian stimulation in an intrauterine insemination programme.

Prediction of poor-response is of equal importance to prediction of over-response in intrauterine insemination programmes. The gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) stimulation test (GAST) was assessed as a predictor of over-response to ovarian stimulation in 81 patients. Blood samples were taken on cycle day 2 (before and 24 h after starting the GnRHa). Day 2 and 3 samples were assayed for oestradiol, follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH). Linear and logistic regression analyses were used to assess age, day 2 FSH, day 2 FSH/LH, oestradiol ratio (oestradiol on day 3/oestradiol on day 2) and FSH ratio (FSH on day 3/FSH on day 2) as predictors of the number of follicles (total and > or = 14 mm), oestradiol on HCG day, and clinical pregnancy rate as appropriate. Several parameters were also compared between the patients who produced < or = 3 (> or = 14 mm) follicles (group A) and those who produced >3 (> or = 14 mm) follicles (group B). The mean +/- SEM age of the patients in the study was 32 +/- 0.4 years. The mean total dose of recombinant FSH was 800 +/- 20 IU and the mean duration of stimulation was 7.6 +/- 0.2 days. Nine (11%) and 12 (15%) patients were cancelled for poor and over-response respectively. The oestradiol ratio was significantly positively correlated with oestradiol on HCG day (P < 0.001), and with the number of mature follicles (> or = 14 mm) (P = 0.01). Age, day 2 FSH and FSH ratio were not significantly correlated with oestradiol on HCG day, total follicles and follicles > or = 14 mm. None of the above-mentioned variables was correlated with clinical pregnancy rate. Group A had significantly lower oestradiol ratio (P = 0.007), longer duration of stimulation (P = 0.002), higher total FSH dose (P = 0.001), and lower oestradiol on HCG day (P = 0.001). GAST is therefore useful in predicting the high responders to gonadotrophin stimulation.     

Regulation of follicle development and novel approaches to ovarian stimulation for IVF

Current ovarian stimulation regimens for IVF are complex and not without risk. Increasing our knowledge of the physiology of follicle development and dominant follicle selection may enable the design of less complex, safer and cheaper ovarian stimulation regimens for IVF. Decremental serum FSH concentrations during the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle are required for single dominant follicle selection. Only the most mature follicle will continue its development due to increased sensitivity for stimulation by FSH. FSH stimulation becomes insufficient for less mature follicles and remaining cohort follicles will therefore go into atresia. The number of days during which FSH is above the threshold for stimulation of follicle development is limited, resulting in a narrow FSH window. More medium sized and large pre-ovulatory follicles and increased oestradiol output can be induced by the administration of small doses of exogenous FSH during the mid- to late follicular phase, preventing the physiological decrease in FSH stimulation. Intervention with decremental serum FSH concentrations in combination with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists to prevent a premature rise in serum LH may induce ongoing growth of multiple follicles sufficient for IVF. The benefits and risks of these minimal hyperstimulation protocols require further evaluation.     

GnRH agonist versus GnRH antagonist in oocyte donation cycles: a prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND: The specific role of LH in folliculogenesis and oocyte maturation is unclear. GnRH antagonists, when administered in the late follicular phase, induce a sharp decrease in serum LH which may be detrimental for IVF outcome. This study was performed to evaluate whether the replacement of GnRH agonist (triptorelin) by a GnRH antagonist (ganirelix; NV Organon) in oocyte donation cycles has any impact on pregnancy and implantation rates. METHODS: A total of 148 donor IVF cycles was randomly assigned to use either a GnRH antagonist daily administered from the 8th day of stimulation (group I) or a GnRH agonist long protocol (group II) for the ovarian stimulation of their donors. The primary endpoints were the pregnancy and the implantation rates. RESULTS: The clinical pregnancy rate per transfer (39.72%, 29/73 versus 41.33%, 31/75) based on transvaginal scan findings at 7 weeks of gestation, the implantation rate (23.9 versus 25.4%) and the first trimester abortion rate (10.34 versus 12.90%) were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSION: In oocyte donation cycles the replacement of GnRH agonist by a GnRH antagonist appears to have no impact on the pregnancy and implantation rates when its administration starts on day 8 of stimulation.