Computed radiography in musculoskeletal imaging: state of the art.

Computed radiography is a 2K x 2K x 10 bit digital radiographic system that replaces the film-screen combination with a photo-stimulable phosphor plate. The advantages of this relatively new technology include linear detector response, improved detector efficiency, and digital processing capabilities. Musculoskeletal applications benefit significantly from these attributes, which result clinically in the ability to reduce both radiation dose and number of exposures. Studies of observers' performance have shown no statistically significant difference in diagnostic accuracy between film-screen and computed radiographic musculoskeletal images. Computed radiography is particularly useful in the evaluation of the musculoskeletal system in traumatized patients with portable radiographs, spine radiographs, scoliosis studies, and depiction of soft-tissue abnormalities. Limitations include change in image format and size, high cost, decreased spatial resolution, restricted throughput, increased perception of noise, and new artifacts that must be recognized. Spatial resolution limitations of computed radiography in identification of fine detail information can be improved by using magnification techniques. Radiation dose reduction with an exposure decrease of 25-50% can be achieved without loss of diagnostic accuracy, although this depends on the examination and the abnormality. An interactive workstation is important in the use of a computed radiographic system with capabilities to adjust display parameters to best depict images and disease. We conclude that computed radiography is an alternative to film-screen radiography without significant differences in diagnostic quality in the evaluation of musculoskeletal images.     

Report on a new type of trauma full-body digital X-ray machine

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic equivalence, radiation dose, clinical usefulness and radiographic aspects of a low-dose, full-body digital X-ray machine in a busy trauma unit. A digital trauma X-ray machine known as "LODOX" was compared with conventional radiography between June 1999 and November 2001 in the Groote Schuur Hospital Trauma Unit, Cape Town. Digital images of a variety of body regions commonly imaged in trauma were compared for diagnostic image quality in a number of categories with equivalent conventional radiographs. A seven-point equivalence scoring system ranging from much inferior (−3) through equivalent (0) to much superior (+3) was used in each category. Radiation dose was recorded and compared with that in conventional measurements. Turnaround times of patients undergoing digital and conventional X-rays were evaluated. Clinical and radiographic issues were assessed by staff feedback. The digital images when compared with conventional film had an overall mean equivalence score of −0.429, with a standard deviation (SD) of 0.77. The best digital performance was in the mediastinum (mean 0.346, SD 0.49) and the weakest was for bony detail (mean −0.654, SD 0.81). Relative digital radiation dose compared to conventional varied from 72% (chest) to 2% (pelvis), with a simple average of 6%. Radiographic points included full-body imaging capability and differing positioning, penetration, workflow and practicality considerations. The digital images required overall patient times of 5–6 min, compared with 8–48 min for conventional X-rays. New installations are under way, and computed tomography and angiography applications are being explored. FDA approval is awaited. Projected cost is similar to that of flat-panel digital units. This digital unit was felt to be diagnostically substantially equivalent to conventional radiographs, with low-dose full-body imaging, improved workflow, digital technology and long-term cost benefits as potentially favourable contributions to trauma imaging. Electronic Publication     

Traditional and digital urography compared. The authors' own experience

A computed radiographic system for generating and archiving digital radiographic images was employed in ivp. The system produces 2 digital images per exposure: the first one simulates a conventional radiograph, while the second enhances some spatial frequencies and emphasizes the structure borders. The conventional radiographs and the digital images of 50 patients submitted to ivp were reviewed by four experienced radiologists to evaluate their comparative quality, and the results were statistically analyzed. Digital images proved to be better than conventional radiographs for some of the selected parameters, especially in the evaluation of renal edges and sometimes for calyceal opacification. As for the other parameters, no statistically significant difference was observed between conventional radiographs and digital images.     

A comparison of conventional intra-oral radiography and computer imaging techniques for the detection of proximal surface dental caries.

The detection of proximal surface caries by the visual interpretation of bitewing radiographs is known to be relatively inaccurate. The present study was designed to examine whether computer image processing could improve the diagnostic accuracy. A computer-aided, software-driven, TV-based system was used to digitize conventional radiographs and digitally process the images using histogram equalization and grey-scale inversion to enhance the images. The computer-enhanced images were compared with conventional intra-oral radiographs for the detection of proximal surface caries using receiver operating characteristic analysis. The results indicate that the digital image processing techniques used did not improve the diagnostic accuracy of dental radiographs. No significant difference in diagnostic accuracy could be detected between the non-enhanced digital images and conventional film-based images for the detection of proximal surface caries.     

Detection of pneumothorax: comparison of digital and conventional chest imaging

To investigate radiologists' performance at interpreting digital radiographic images, we compared the detectability of pneumothoraces on computed radiographic chest images with 0.2-mm pixel size (2.5 Ip/mm) with their detectability on matched conventional screen-film images (5 Ip/mm). Eight radiologists reviewed 50 computed and 50 screen-film chest radiographs from 25 patients with pneumothoraces and 25 patients with other (or no) abnormalities. Four of the readers who best detected pneumothoraces on screen-film examinations performed worse when interpreting computed radiographic studies; the other four readers detected pneumothoraces similarly with both techniques. No relationship was found between the size of a pneumothorax and its likelihood of detection by either technique. These results raise concerns about implementing computed radiography for comprehensive chest imaging.     

Double-contrast arthrography of the knee: a digital technique study

From October 1989, in our Radiology Department, digital radiographic techniques have been applied to double-contrast arthrography of the knee. In this preliminary work we examine the diagnostic contribution of computed radiography to arthrographic findings by comparing image quality of conventional and digital radiographs using a dedicated Philips unit. The digital unit is compatible with all the extant radiographic equipment in our department and automatically supplies two images, the first one resembling a conventional radiograph, the second one characterized by a broader exposure range that allows a clear visualization of soft tissues. To obtain high-quality radiographs the processing curves of the system were modified, in particular by shifting the curve leftward, thus reducing its slope, and by amending the parameters related to spatial frequencies. The changes in the reading curves made these images more useful: they were more homogeneous and allowed a better evaluation of fine details. Relative to the second type of images, characterized by both edge enhancement and a broader recording range, it was enough to shift the curve along the X-axis to compensate for a moderate image overexposure. Keeping in mind that the aim of this preliminary work was not compare the two techniques from a diagnostic point of view, in the authors' opinion the two yield similar information for the diagnostic evaluation of meniscal traumas. On the contrary, if the same principles are applied to the evaluation of capsulo-ligamentous components, digital arthrography appears to be more accurate than the conventional technique, the latter being deceptive especially in the evaluation of cruciate ligaments.     

Digital chest radiography with a solid-state flat-panel x-ray detector: contrast-detail evaluation with processed images printed on film hard copy

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare human observer performance in a contrast-detail test by using postprocessed hard-copy images from a digital chest radiography system and conventional screen-film radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The digital radiography system is based on a large-area flat-panel x-ray detector with a structured cesium iodide scintillator layer and an amorphous silicon thin-film transistor array for image readout. Images of a contrast-detail phantom were acquired at two exposure levels by using two standard thoracic screen-film systems and the digital system at matched dose. By using images of the phantom processed with standard chest image postprocessing techniques, a four-alternative forced-choice observer perception study was performed, and the number of detectable test signals (disk-shaped objects 0.3-4.0 mm in diameter) was determined for each image type. RESULTS: On average, observers detected more test signals on digital images than on screen-film radiographs at all diameters up to 2.0 mm and an equivalent number at larger diameters. Test signals with lower inherent subject contrast were detected more readily on digital images than on screen-film images, even when x-ray exposure levels for the digital system were reduced by 20%. CONCLUSION: Observer performance in a contrast-detail detection task can be improved by using images acquired with the flat-panel digital chest radiography system as compared with those acquired with state-of-the-art screen-film combinations.     

Automated registration of frontal and lateral radionuclide lung scans with digital chest radiographs

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate a fully automated method that spatially registers anterior, posterior, and lateral ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) images with posteroanterior and lateral digital chest radiographs to retrospectively combine the physiologic information contained in the V/Q scans with the anatomic detail in the chest radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Gray-level thresholding techniques were used to segment the aerated lung regions in the radiographic images. A variable-thresholding technique combined with an analysis of image noise was used to segment the adequately perfused or ventilated lung regions in the scintigraphic images. The physical dimensions of the segmented lung regions in images from both modalities were used to properly scale the radiographic images relative to the radionuclide images. Computer-determined locations of anatomic landmarks were then used to rotate and translate the images to achieve registration. Pairs of corresponding radionuclide and radiographic images were enhanced with color and then merged to create superimposed images. RESULTS: Five observers used a five-point rating scale to subjectively evaluate four image combinations for each of 50 cases. Of these ratings, 95.5% reflected very good, good, or fair registration. CONCLUSION: The automated method for the registration of radionuclide lung scans with digital chest radiographs to produce images that combine functional and structural information should benefit nuclear medicine physicians and radiologists, who must visually correlate images that differ greatly in physical size, resolution properties, and information content.     

The effect of varying high pass filter parameters on the detectability of isolated pulmonary nodules in digitized chest images

The effect of image processing of digital radiographic data on lesion detectability in clinical images has not been systematically studied. In this experiment, we evaluated a low frequency suppression filter program applied to CT digital radiographic localization images (General Electric Scoutview). Three different filter parameters affecting edge enhancement and local image contrast were applied to a set of digital chest images. A standard observer detection experiment comparing the variously filtered digital images and standard chest radiographs in the detection of lung nodules (11 peripheral lung fields, one superimposed on aortic arch) was performed. Standard chest radiography was more sensitive than the digital chest images, although some improvement was noted with increase in local image contrast and edge enhancement. Both image formats were equally specific. Image processing would be better evaluated using a digital imaging system with better performance parameters.     

Flat-screen detector systems in skeletal radiology

Implementation of flat-panel detectors and digital integration of the technique instead of the use of conventional radiographs leads to a shortening of the work process. With flat-panel technology the image production process is shortened by more than 30%. Major advantages in the implementation of integrated RIS, PACS and flat-panel detector system are increases in quality because most mistakes in picture labeling can be avoided, easier handling without the need for cassettes, and the possibility of image post-processing. The diagnostic quality of the images in the field of musculoskeletal radiology is, in comparison to conventional radiographs, at least adequate and in most cases markedly improved with a marked reduction in radiation exposure of around 30-50%. With respect to the numerous advantages of the digital techniques and especially flat-panel technology there is a very high likelihood that conventional radiographs will be substituted in the coming years, even though the cost of the new technology is currently significantly higher compared to conventional systems.     

Lumbar spine radiography--poor collimation practices after implementation of digital technology

Objectives

The transition from analogue to digital radiography may have reduced the motivation to perform proper collimation, as digital techniques have made it possible to mask areas irradiated outside the area of diagnostic interest (ADI). We examined the hypothesis that collimation practices have deteriorated since digitalisation.

Methods

After defining the ADI, we compared the proportion of the irradiated field outside the ADI in 86 digital and 86 analogue frontal lumbar spine radiographs using the Mann–Whitney test. 50 digital images and 50 analogue images were from a Norwegian hospital and the remainder from a Danish hospital. Consecutive digital images were compared with analogue images (from the hospitals'' archives) produced in the 4 years prior to digitalisation. Both hospitals'' standard radiographic procedures remained unchanged during the study. For digital images, the irradiated field was assessed using non-masked raw-data images.

Results

The proportion of the irradiated field outside the ADI was larger in digital than in analogue images (mean 61.7% vs 42.4%, p<0.001), and also in a subsample of 39 image pairs that could be matched for patient age (p<0.001). The mean total field size was 46% larger in digital than in analogue images (791 cm² vs 541 cm²).

Conclusion

Following the implementation of digital radiography, considerably larger areas were irradiated. This causes unnecessarily high radiation doses to patients.In medical imaging, radiation doses to patients should be kept as low as reasonably achievable [1]. This requires proper collimation. Limiting the irradiated field to the area of diagnostic interest (ADI) is essential, since the dose increases with irradiated area [2]. Digital image processing programs can be used in daily practice to mask an unnecessarily large collimation so that you can no longer see whether the image is optimally collimated or electronically edited [3]. This could reduce the motivation to carry out proper collimation. However, no previous studies have evaluated this issue. We therefore examined the hypothesis that collimation practices have deteriorated since the implementation of digital radiography.     

Double-contrast enema. Study of the mucosal pattern and the organ profile with conventional and digital methods]

A solid state digital system (FCR 101) was employed in our comparative evaluation of the image quality of conventional versus digital techniques in the study of colon by means of double-contrast enema. Sixty patients were examined with a single AP view, using digital radiography with 100% radiation dose and progressive 50% and 75% reductions; the radiographs thus obtained were then compared with the corresponding conventional ones. The examined parameters were organ profile and mucosal pattern. Each digital and conventional radiograph was evaluated by 2 independent radiologists and a value was given to each parameter i.e., 1 = good, 2 = sufficient, 3 = insufficient. Upon comparison of the average values obtained for digital and conventional radiographs in optimal conditions and with a dose reduced by 50%, the digital technique was seen to give a more detailed and accurate representation of both low-contrast mucosal pattern and of organ profile. With the dose reduced by 75%, a slight increase was observed in background noise which caused a slight loss in image definition, but this did not reduce image readability with respect to conventional radiographs. To conclude, the digital method with a 50% exposure reduction is to be preferred in the examination of the colon, especially in pediatric radiology; furthermore, since this technique allows better detailing at lower contrast, it is to be preferred in the study of the pathologic conditions affecting mainly/only the mucosal pattern--e.g., cancer, ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, and so on. An exposure dose reduced by 75% may be used for following lesions previously diagnosed and when a less detailed depiction of the mucosal pattern is enough.     

Clinical utility of ultra-low-dose pre-test exposure to avoid unnecessary patient exposure due to positioning errors: a simulation study

The use of digital radiographic systems has decreased the frequency of image retakes due to over/underexposure in general radiography. However, image retakes owing to patient positioning errors are likely to increase because of the convenience of a real-time image check on a console table. The purpose of the present study is to propose a novel radiographic examination procedure with an ultra-low-dose pre-test exposure that may be utilized to check patient positioning prior to taking an actual image, thereby reducing unnecessary patient exposure owing to image retakes. In this study, examination data from 714 knee joint radiographs, both submitted and retaken images, were included. Twelve radiological technologists (RTs) took all images. The actual total exposure dose for each patient was compared with simulated total doses utilized in the proposed procedure. The simulation assumed that each examination was completed following pre-test exposure. Therefore, this method did not involve retaking images although at least one pre-test exposure had been applied to all patients. Pre-test exposures at four dose levels corresponding to 25, 10, 5, and 2% of the actual exposure dose were evaluated to determine whether each dose level could be used to check patient positioning. The results indicated that when the pre-test exposure dose rate was 10% or lower, the total exposure dose reduction equaled or exceeded 8% for all patients. The use of the proposed procedure reduced the total exposure dose for all patients when compared to the exposure dose calculated from records.     

Optimization of X-ray conditions for full spine X-ray examinations in slot-scan digital radiography

The purpose of this study was to optimize X-ray conditions for full spine X-ray examinations in slot-scan digital radiography (SSDR). Follow-up of spinal deformities, such as scoliosis, typically involves many radiographs of the patient throughout childhood and adolescence. The Radiation doses for the full spine X-ray examination should be minimized. Recently, SSDR has been introduced for full spine as well as lower extremity examinations. This system utilizes slot scanning geometry to acquire the radiographic images. X-ray energy characteristics of direct amorphous Selenium (a-Se) digital fluoroscopy and short time X-ray tube loads of this system were investigated. Orthopedists evaluated the irradiation time for full spine radiographs in various conditions using an observer study. Patient doses were measured with radiophotoluminescence glass dosimeters, which were implanted in various tissue and organ positions within an anthropomorphic phantom. In the optimization of conditions for SSDR, patient doses are reduced by approximately 60% compared to default setting.     

Results of computer-aided diagnosis of peripheral bronchial carcinoma.

Radiographic images can be converted into numerical sequences that can be evalueate by computer to determine the significance of certain radiographic findings in peripheral pulmonary nodules. Of three methods (discriminant analysis. Bayes' theoroem, and the Calm system), discriminant analysis has proven the best with an accuracy rate of 85%. By taking into account serial radiographs and statements on the possible growth of the neoplasm, the accuracy of the method can be increased to 90%. A simplified, inexpensive and effective method for application of this diagnostic tool is described.     

Comparison of chest and abdominal x-ray radiation dose and its image quality-a multi-center study

While radiography provides us clinically valuable information, it increases the risk of radiation exposure. Previous studies have reported great variations in radiation doses among institutions. It is concerning that radiation doses will increase and vary greatly from institution to institution when digital radiographic modalities become more common. In the present study, we measured chest and abdominal radiation doses at 10 institutions that had X-ray digital imaging systems. Differences in radiation doses among the institutions were evaluated and compared with the previous reports. The image quality at the measured radiation doses were also evaluated. The doses were measured by the same dosimeter, and the image quality at a specific dose was evaluated using the standard deviation of the digital values and Wiener spectrum. Our results indicate that the difference in radiation among institutions was approximately five-fold at a maximum and smaller than the previous reports had indicated. The image quality was improved as the dose was increased. We considered the five-fold difference to be the result of variations in optimum image quality and associated radiation doses among institutions. In summary, evaluating the radiation dose along with the image quality is important to optimize the doses.     

Digital radiographic evaluation of the bile ducts

This study compares digital radiographic images of the bile ducts in dogs with images obtained using routine radiography. The dogs were infused with iodipamide (2 ml/minute for 30 minutes), and the bile ducts were imaged at 60 minutes using plain radiograph and five digital techniques: (1) dual-energy, (2) DSA-hybrid prepixel shift, (3) DSA-hybrid postpixel shift, (4) a dual-energy film system--Digirad, and (5) scan projection radiography using hybrid subtraction. Six radiologists who were not familiar with digital radiography evaluated the six different studies. The images were presented in a randomized order and each image was evaluated on a five-point scale. There was no difference between the plain radiographs and the dual-energy images. Both of these studies were rated significantly better (P less than .001) than the other four digital images. These results suggest that digital radiography during direct cholangiography may be easily accomplished using a 10% to 15% iodine solution.     

Diagnostic quality of portable abdominal radiographs in neonates with necrotizing enterocolitis: digitized vs nondigitized images

Digital manipulation of radiographic images has prompted significant interest because of the potential for improving image quality and diagnostic accuracy. We compared conventional and digital radiographs in the evaluation of neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). Fifty abdominal radiographs in neonates with suspected or autopsy-confirmed NEC and 50 similar radiographs of neonates without suspicion of NEC were digitized. Definition of intraabdominal anatomy was optimized by window width and level adjustment. Hard-copy radiographs of the digitally manipulated images were then produced by a laser printer. Twelve general radiologists each evaluated, without benefit of clinical information, a random mixture of 50 cases of NEC and normal controls, with both conventional and digital images for each case, for a total of 100 radiographs reviewed. Each image was evaluated for overall suspicion of NEC and the presence and severity of six radiographic signs of NEC. The radiologists also rated their confidence in their assessments. The results were compared with those from a similar analysis by an experienced pediatric radiologist to ensure validity of image evaluation. No statistically significant differences were found between the conventional and digital imaging formats for the assessment of the signs of NEC (p = .15) or for determination of the overall suspicion of NEC (p = .07). Our results show the digitized and the conventional, nondigitized radiographs to be at least equally useful for evaluating the radiographic signs of NEC and suggesting an appropriate diagnosis.     

Clinical comparative study with a large-area amorphous silicon flat-panel detector: image quality and visibility of anatomic structures on chest radiography.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare clinical chest radiographs of a large-area, flat-panel digital radiography system and a conventional film-screen radiography system. The comparison was based on an observer preference study of image quality and visibility of anatomic structures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Routine follow-up chest radiographs were obtained from 100 consecutive oncology patients using a large-area, amorphous silicon flat-panel detector digital radiography system (dose equivalent to a 400-speed film system). Hard-copy images were compared with previous examinations of the same individuals taken on a conventional film-screen system (200-speed). Patients were excluded if changes in the chest anatomy were detected or if the time interval between the examinations exceeded 1 year. Observer preference was evaluated for the image quality and the visibility of 15 anatomic structures using a five-point scale. RESULTS: Dose measurements with a chest phantom showed a dose reduction of approximately 50% with the digital radiography system compared with the film-screen radiography system. The image quality and the visibility of all but one anatomic structure of the images obtained with the digital flat-panel detector system were rated significantly superior (p < or = 0.0003) to those obtained with the conventional film-screen radiography system. CONCLUSION: The image quality and visibility of anatomic structures on the images obtained by the flat-panel detector system were perceived as equal or superior to the images from conventional film-screen chest radiography. This was true even though the radiation dose was reduced approximately 50% with the digital flat-panel detector system.     

Correction for attenuation and visual response in digital radiography

OBJECTIVES: To derive a method to correct for the exponential attenuation adding visual linearization for digital radiography and to perform an experimental test to study effects on observer performance. METHOD: A theoretical analysis was performed and expressions were derived to correct radiographic data for the attenuation. An experiment was performed exposing an aluminum step wedge with holes of increasing depths behind each step plus soft tissue simulation. Seven original images were created with a digital intraoral X-ray sensor and a further 14 transformed images produced. Ten observers examined the images in a randomized order reporting the number of holes seen per wedge step. The results were analysed by One Way ANOVA. RESULTS: It was possible to correct for attenuation and the response of the human visual system to light intensities from a computer monitor. Perception was significantly improved in all recalculated radiographs that took both attenuation and the response of the eye into account (P-values ranged from <0.0001 to <0.0286). CONCLUSIONS: The transforms may be useful for improved perception when viewing digital radiographs.