Helicobacter pylori is an aetiological factor for ischaemic heart disease: the case in favour

The evidence to date concerning the association between Helicobacter pylori infection and coronary heart disease is consistent with a modest increased risk. Research is currently being undertaken into factors which may modify this association. Probably, there is sufficient evidence given the ease of the proposed intervention to make it worthwhile to undertake a trial of eradication therapy.     

Helicobacter pylori is an aetiological factor for ischaemic heart disease: the case against

Helicobacter pylori is one of four organisms often investigated for ari association with ischaemic heart disease. The four, including Chlamydia pneumoniae, Cytomegalovirus and Herpes virus, cause low-grade, life-long infections that can produce a persistent inflammation, the kind that leads to heart disease. Several studies suggest an association, but others suggest none. Patients with poor access to medical care are more likely to become infected and also more likely to suffer from coronary artery disease. Although the literature data are provocative and interesting, the two things may not be related. Helicobacter pylori infection is quite prevalent among individuals without ischaemic heart disease and absent in many of those with ischaemic heart disease. Thus, more definite answers about whether there is any link between Helicobacter pylori and cardiovascular disease are needed. It would be essential to establish the specific mechanisms that possibly confer vulnerability or protection toward coronaropathy. But a definite answer could come from clinical trials designed to test whether antibiotics can prevent the disease. Until now, no randomised trial has suggested a positive effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication in reducing the incidence of cardiac events.     

Discrepancy between Helicobacter pylori stool antigen assay and urea breath test in the detection of Helicobacter pylori infection

Background. The reference diagnostic methods available for detection of Helicobacter pylori infection are either invasive (histology) or expensive and highly sophisticated (Urea Breath Test). A new enzyme immunoassay, which can be easily performed in any laboratory, has been developed to detect Helicobacter pylori in stool specimens (HpSA - Meridian Diagnostics, Cincinnati, USA). Aim of the study was to compare HpSA to Urea Breath Test.Patients and methods. A total of 125 patients (52 never treated for Helicobacter pylori infection and 73 after Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy) referring to our Department, underwent both tests within two weeks.Results. Contrasting results between the two tests were found in 30% of cases: in 19% of the untreated patients and in 37% of the treated patients (p<0.001). The main discrepancy consisted in positive HpSA associated with negative Urea Breath Test. Mean HpSA value in such conditions was 0.273 optical density, while in patients with both positive tests, it was 1.192 optical density. In untreated, but not in treated patients, raising the HpSA cut off value significantly decreased the percentage of conflicting results.Conclusions. Some disagreement was detected between HpSA and Urea Breath Test results, especially in treated patients. Possible explanations for our findings are a low HpSA cut off value together with the identification of Helicobacter pylori coccoid forms by the immunoassay but not by the urease based Urea Breath Test. The higher percentage of discrepancy detected in treated patients might support this hypothesis.     

Severe acute gastritis associated with Helicobacter pylori infection

We describe the case of a young female referred to our unit because of acute upper abdominal symptoms. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy showed a gastric picture resembling lymphoma or acute non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug gastropathy (deep, large and irregular ulcers), but the clinical history and the histological examination of gastric biopsies were consistent only with acute gastritis Helicobacter pylori-correlated. The patient was treated with omeprazole and antibiotics with complete recovery. As the patient's cat had suffered from an acute gastrointestinal distress two weeks earlier, a case of zoonosis was hypothesized and an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was performed also on the cat. Unfortunately, we were not able to detect Helicobacter pylori in the cat gastric mucosa, but only urease-producing spiral microorganisms. Possible sources of infection and pathogenetic mechanisms of the severe gastritis are discussed.     

Helicobacter pylori infection in subjects with acute ischaemic stroke

AIMS: To determine whether infection with Helicobacter pylori is a significant risk factor for stroke. SUBJECTS: A total 467 in-patients with clinical evidence of acute ischaemic stroke and 388 healthy controls with no evidence of cerebrovascular disease. METHODS: This was a case control study. The prevalence of Helicobacter pylori was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in stroke patients and controls. A positive titre was defined as >15 U/ml and relationship with circulating plasma fibrinogen and social depravation was expressed using the Townsend Index. RESULTS: There were significantly more Helicobacter pylori positive individuals (274/398 (69%)) in the cases compared to the controls (206/352 (58.5%)). Fibrinogen levels were also significantly higher in Helicobacter pylori positive (mean 4.14, standard deviation 1.33) than negative individuals (mean 3.78, standard deviation 1.28). The association between Helicobacter pylori and stroke was lost in a logistic model controlling for socio-economic status. Furthermore, fibrinogen levels were not associated with Helicobacter pylori status in a linear regression model controlling for socio-economic status. CONCLUSIONS: Infection with Helicobacter pylori is associated with an increased risk of stroke and increased fibrinogen levels but these findings can be attributed to a confounding effect of socio-economic status.     

Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with liver cirrhosis: facts and fictions

Helicobacter pylori infection could play a role in different clinical alterations observed in cirrhosis, from gastroduodenal lesions to hepatic encephalopathy. Although its prevalence in cirrhotics is similar to that in controls, H. pylori infection is responsible for the increased prevalence of peptic ulcer observed in these patients. The ammonia production by H. pylori urease does not seem to increase blood ammonia levels during cirrhosis, indicating that its role in hepatic encephalopathy could be marginalized in clinical practice. Dual and triple therapies have been shown to be equally effective for H. pylori eradication in these patients.     

Two new treatment regimens for Helicobacter pylori eradication: a randomised study

BACKGROUND: Several studies have found a fairly low Helicobacter pylori eradication rate using a standard 7-day triple therapy in Italy. Recently, two new therapeutic schedules have been proposed with an eradication rate higher than 90%. This study compared the efficacy of these two treatment regimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 131 patients with Helicobacter pylori infection and either non-ulcer dyspepsia (73 patients] or peptic ulcer (58 patients) were enrolled. Helicobacter pylori infection was assessed by rapid urease test and histology on gastric biopsies. Patients were randomised to receive either a 5-day course of ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg bid, clarithromycin 500 bid, and tinidazole 500 bid, or a 10-day course of omeprazole 20 mg bid plus amoxycillin 1 g bid for the first 5 days, and omeprazole 20 mg bid, clarithromycin 500 mg bid and tinidazole 500 mg bid for the remaining 5 days. Eradication was assessed by endoscopy 4-6 weeks after therapy. RESULTS: Overall, 4 patients (2 for each treatment group) were lost to follow-up. Helicobacter pylori eradication rates were 67.2% (95% confidence interval: 55.7-78.7) and 65.2% (95% confidence interval: 53.7-76.6) at per protocol and intention-to-treat analyses, respectively, after the 5-day regimen, and 96.8% (95% confidence interval: 92.5-100) and 93.8% (95% confidence interval: 88-99.7) after the 10-day regimen (p<0.05). Both treatments were well tolerated, and no major side-effects were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The 5-day regimen gave disappointing results, while the eradication rate after the 10-day regimen was very high.     

A third-line levofloxacin-based rescue therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori infection persists in a considerable proportion of patients after both first- and second-line current treatments. A standard therapy for re-treatment in such refractory patients is still lacking. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a levofloxacin-amoxycillin combination in patients who previously failed two or more therapeutic attempts. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients with persistent Helicobacter pylori infection were enrolled. Bacterial infection was assessed by rapid urease test and histology on gastric biopsies at endoscopy. Patients were assigned to receive a 10-day triple therapy, comprising rabeprazole 20 mg b.d., levofloxacin 250 mg b.d., and amoxycillin 1 g b.d. Four to 6 weeks after therapy, Helicobacter pylori eradication was assessed by a further endoscopy or 13C urea breath test. RESULTS: Overall, 36 patients were enrolled, but two patients were lost to follow-up. Helicobacter pylori was successfully cured in 30 patients, giving an 83.3% (95% CI=71.2-95.5) and 88.2% (95% CI=77.4-99) eradication rate at intention-to-treat and per protocol analysis, respectively. Compliance was good in all but two patients, who discontinued the treatment at 8 and 6 days, respectively, on account of glossitis. No major side-effects were reported, whilst 7 (20.1%) patients complained of mild side-effects. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that a 10-day levofloxacin-amoxycillin triple therapy is a safe and successful third-line therapeutic approach for Helicobacter pylori eradication.     

Dyspepsia and Helicobacter pylori infection: a prospective multicentre observational study

OBJECTIVES: Dyspepsia still represents an unsolved clinical enigma. AIM: The aims of this study were to determine whether symptoms and Helicobacter pylori infection are predictors of organic disease in uninvestigated dyspepsia, and if H. pylori eradication improves symptoms in functional dyspepsia. METHODS: An observational study was performed on outpatients with uninvestigated dyspepsia. Symptoms were scored and H. pylori status determined. Patients with functional dyspepsia and H. pylori infection were randomly given either a standard eradicating treatment or a 1-month course of empirical treatment. The latter was also given to functional dyspeptic patients without infection. Symptoms were re-assessed in functional dyspeptic patients at 2- and 6-month follow-up visits. Patients receiving eradicating treatment were re-tested for H. pylori at the 2 month visit. RESULTS: A total of 860 patients were studied and 605 (70.3%) were affected by functional dyspepsia. H. pylori infection was diagnosed in 71.8% of patients with organic dyspepsia and in 65.0% with functional dyspepsia (p=0.053). Male sex, anaemia, smoking habit, age over 45 years, and severe epigastric pain, but not H. pylori infection, were independent predictors of organic disease. Symptoms significantly improved in most functional dyspeptic patients regardless of their H. pylori status and type of treatment. CONCLUSION: H. pylori infection is not a strong predictor of organic disease in uninvestigated dyspepsia. H. pylori eradication is not essential to improve symptoms in functional dyspepsia.     

Helicobacter pylori diagnosis in patients with liver cirrhosis

BACKGROUND: In cirrhotics, Helicobacter pylori infection is the major cause of peptic lesions, which are an important cause of upper intestinal haemorrhage in these patients. However, some diagnostic methods are not accurate for H. pylori detection in cirrhotics. AIMS: The study assessed the accuracy of different diagnostic methods for H. pylori detection in cirrhotics with and without gastroduodenal lesions. METHODS: The study population comprised of 53 cirrhotics. All patients underwent upper endoscopy: three biopsies were taken in the antrum and three in the gastric body. Four biopsies were used for Giemsa staining, while two were used for a rapid urease test. A blood sample was obtained for serology using Western blotting, and a [13C]urea breath test was performed in all patients. Histological assessment was regarded as the gold standard for diagnosis of H. pylori infection. RESULTS: H. pylori infection was detected at histological assessment in 28 (52.8%) patients. The [13C]urea breath test, rapid urease test, and serology were positive in 27 (51%) patients, 23 (43.4%) patients, and 34 (64.1%) patients, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity were 92.9 and 96% for the [13C]urea breath test, 78.6 and 96% for the rapid urease test, and 78.6 and 52% for serology. CONCLUSIONS: The [13C]urea breath test is very accurate in cirrhotics, whilst both serology and the rapid urease test give disappointing results.     

Comparison of two new rapid serology tests for diagnois of Helicobacter pylori infection in Chinese patients

Background. Rapid serology test is a simple and convenient way for diagnosing Helicobacter pylori infection. However, performances of these tests are usually less satisfactory than expected, particularly in developing countries.Aim. To evaluate the performances of two newly developed rapid serology tests for Helicobacter pylori infection.Patients. Consecutive Chinese dyspeptic patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.Methods. Gastric biopsies were obtained from antrum and corpus for rapid urease test and histological examination. Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection was based on two or more positive results in rapid urease test, histology and [¹³C] urea breath test. Patients' sera were tested against two rapid serology tests: ASSURE Hp Rapid Test (Genelabs Diagnostics, Singapore) and SureStep (Applied Biotech, San Diego, CA, USA).Results. A total of 148 patients were evaluated and Helicobacter pylori infection was diagnosed in 78 (53%) patients by gold standard. The sensitivities of ASSURE Hp and SureStep were, respectively, 94% and 71 % (p=0.0003). Specificities of the two test kits were both 90%. The overall accuracy of ASSURE Hp was significantly higher than SureStep (92% versus 80%, P=0.004).Conclusion: Both rapid serology tests appear to be specific in diagnosing Helicobacter pylori infection in the Chinese populations. However, the ASSURE Hp test is more sensitive and accurate than the SureStep test.     

Role of Helicobacter pylori infection in pernicious anaemia

Background. Pernicious anaemia is associated with atrophic body gastritis and considered an autoimmune disease. Whether Helicobacter pylori is involved in the induction of pernicious anaemia is uncertain.Aims. To investigate the prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in pernicious anaemia patients and to ascertain whether the Helicobacter pylori positive patients had distinctive clinical and gastric morphofunctional characteristics.Patients and Methods. A series of 81 consecutive pernicious anaemia patients underwent serological, functional and endoscopic/histological investigations.Results. A total of 49 (60.5%) patients were Helicobacter pylori-positive (males 61.2% vs females 38.8%). No difference was observed in clinical and morphofunctional characteristics between Helicobacter pylori-positive and negative patients, whereas distinctive functional/histological features between histologically Helicobacter pylori-positive (n=8) and serologically Helicobacter pylori-positive (n=41) cases were detected. In the histologically Helicobacter pylori-positive group, Pepsinogen I was higher [13 [0–58] vs 5 [0–26] ng/ml; P=0.0025]) and positivity for anti-parietal cell antibodies was lower [42.9% vs 76.9, P=0.0867). Antral histological variables of the gastritis score were significantly higher in the histologically Helicobacter pylori-positive than in the serologically Helicobacter pylori-positive patients, but this latter group had a higher score of body atrophy (2.63± 0.12 vs 1.71 ± 0.29; P=0.0051). Body inflammation was also significantly higher in the histologically Helicobacter pylori-positive group (chronic inflammation: 1.43±0.2 vs 1.05±0.06; P=0.0271; inflammation acitivity:: 0.57±0.3 vs 0.15±0.06, P=0.0220). Antral mucosa was normal in 24/41 (58.5%) of the serologically Helicobacter pylori-positive patients, but only in 1/8 (12.5%) of the histologically Helicobacter pylori-positive patients (p=0.232).Conclusions. Almost two thirds of pernicious anaemia patients have evidence of Helicobacter pylori, but only those with an active Helicobacter pylori infection have distinctive functional and histological features. These findings support the hypothesis that Helicobacter pylori infection could play a triggering role in a subgroup of pernicious anaemia patients.     

Esomeprazole-based therapy in Helicobacter pylori eradication: a meta-analysis

AIM: To perform a systematic review on the efficacy of esomeprazole-based therapies in Helicobacter pylori eradication, and to conduct a meta-analysis comparing the efficacy of esomeprazole and other proton pump inhibitors when co-prescribed with antibiotics. METHODS: Studies evaluating esomeprazole plus antibiotics were considered. Only randomised trials comparing esomeprazole and other proton pump inhibitors with antibiotics, and differing only in the proton pump inhibitor, were included in the meta-analysis. Electronic and manual bibliographical searches were conducted. The percentage (weighted mean) of eradication success was calculated. Meta-analysis was performed combining the odd ratios of the individual studies. RESULTS: Mean cure rates with dual regimens (esomeprazole plus clarithromycin) were 51 and 54%, respectively, by intention-to-treat and by per-protocol. Corresponding figures with triple regimens (esomeprazole plus clarithromycin and either amoxicillin or metronidazole) were 82% (intention-to-treat) and 86% (per-protocol). Four studies were included in the meta-analysis: mean H. pylori eradication rates (intention-to-treat) with esomeprazole plus antibiotics was 85 and 82% when omeprazole was used (odds ratio = 1.19; 95% confidence interval = 0.81-1.74), results being statistically homogeneous. When subanalysis included only high quality studies, the odds ratio for this comparison was closer to one (1.08; 95% confidence interval = 0.4-1.47) and results were more homogeneous. CONCLUSIONS: Esomeprazole-based triple therapy is highly effective for the eradication of H. pylori infection and offers comparable efficacy to omeprazole-based therapy.     

Treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection. indications and regimens: an update

The management of Helicobacter pylori infection is still surrounded by controversy and uncertainties. Indications and correct application of current regimens for Helicobacter pylori infection are still considered a matter of debate. Regarding indications, only peptic ulcer and mucosa associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma are considered clear indications for treatment. In other conditions, such as atrophic gastritis, post gastric cancer resection, first-degree relatives of gastric cancer patients, dyspeptic patients, patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug users, the value of Helicobacter pylori eradication is still controversial. The regimens for first-line and second-line treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection have been recommended by the Maastricht 2 Consensus Report. Although all the treatments are considered to be effective, physicians still do not agree on what first-line regimen should be used. Furthermore, a consensus on the duration of the antibiotic treatment is still lacking, although Maastricht guidelines for treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection recommend a one-week therapy. Also regimens, as a third-line treatment, and methods to improve compliance and clinical outcome are still a matter of debate. All these points will be considered in the present review.     

Thrombocytopenic purpura: an unusual complication of eradication therapy for Helicobacter pylori

A case of severe thrombocytopenic purpura is described in a 56-year-old female following Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy consisting of omeprazole, clarithromycin and amoxycillin. The pathogenesis of this patient's thrombocytopenia appears to be quite complex. Whilst it was clearly triggered by antibiotic treatment, a direct toxic mechanism does not provide an adequate explanation for the severity and lack of responsiveness to drug treatment. It is tempting to suggest that an immunological mechanism and splenomegaly were also involved.     

Hypersecretory duodenal ulcer and Helicobacter pylori infection: for-year follow-up study

Background. About 10% of duodenal ulcer patients are characterized by gastric acid hypersecretion with normal gastrin values. Relapsing duodenal ulcer after Helicobacter pylori cure has been related to high acid output and maintenance antisecretory therapy has been suggested in hypersecretory duodenal ulcer patients. The role of Helicobacter pylori infection and the effects of Helicobacter pylori cure in hypersecretory duodenal ulcer patients still remain to be fully studied.Aim. To study: a) whether gastric acid hypersecretion “per se” is a risk factor for duodenal ulcer recurrence; b) whether maintenance antisecretory therapy is necessary after eradication in hypersecretory duodenal ulcer patients.Patients. The study population comprised 8 hypersecretory duodenal ulcer patients, selected from a population of 79 Helicobacter pylori-positive duodenal ulcer patients.Methods. Hypersecretory duodenal ulcer patients were followed-up for at least 4 years after eradication. Gastric acid secretion was measured again 12 months after Helicobacter pylori eradication. Gastroscopy with histology was performed 3, 6, 12 and 36 months after treatment, ¹³C-urea breath test after 42 months; clinical questionnaires were completed every 6 months.Results. After eradication, despite a not significantly reduced high acid output (median value of basal acid output and pentagastrin-stimulated acid output, respectively, 23.1 mEg/h and 64. 1 mEg/h before treatment vs 16 mEg/h and 49.7 mEq/h 12 months after treatment), all patients were free from symptoms, none of them had duodenal ulcer relapse or complications (7/8 before treatment), or needed antisecretory maintenance therapy, except for one patient taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.Conclusions. These findings, obtained in a selected population of hypersecretory duodenal ulcer patients with long-term follow-up, suggest that after successful Helicobacter pylori eradication gastric acid hypersecretion “per se” is not able to determine the recurrence of duodenal ulcer.     

Probiotic intervention decreases serum gastrin-17 in Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND: Previously we showed that a probiotic combination with L. rhamnosus GG was beneficial as an adjuvant therapy during H. pylori eradication. AIM: To evaluate whether probiotic combination with LGG adheres to the upper gastrointestinal mucosa and modifies H. pylori colonisation and H. pylori induced inflammation. METHODS: Thirteen patients referred for gastroduodenoscopy received a drink consisting of equal doses (2.5x10(9)CFU) of LGG, L. rhamnosus LC705, Propionibacterium freudenreichii JS and Bifidobacterium lactis Bb12 daily. Recovery of probiotics in biopsies (antrum, corpus, duodenum) and faecal samples was evaluated by strain-specific quantitative polymerase chain reaction. H. pylori colonization and gastric inflammation was investigated by urease activity ((13)C-urea breath test), histology and serum pepsinogen I, II and gastrin-17 measurements. RESULTS: Twelve patients were fully investigated; of these three of the patients had LGG adhering to the biopsies at end of the intervention. Other probiotic strains were not detected, even though the recovery of all individual probiotic strains from the faeces was significantly increased (p<0.01). After the treatment, the level of (13)C-urea breath test (p=0.063) and gastrin-17 (p=0.046) decreased. CONCLUSIONS: The decreases in (13)C-urea breath test and gastrin-17 indicate that the probiotic combination exerts a beneficial effect on gastric mucosa in H. pylori infected patients. LGG showed marginal ability to adhere to the upper gastrointestinal tract mucosa.     

Increased prevalence of Helicobacter pylori in patients with diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND: Whilst upper gastrointestinal disturbances are frequently observed in patients with diabetes mellitus, little is known about the prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection and peptic disease in these patients. AIM: To evaluate prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection and peptic disease lesions in diabetics with dyspeptic symptoms. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Study population comprises 74 consecutive diabetes mellitus patients with dyspepsia and 117 consecutive non diabetic dyspeptic patients. Upon enrolment, each patient completed an interview screening questionnaire to obtain information concerning presence and severity of dyspepsia. All patients underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with biopsy specimens being collected from gastric antrum and body Helicobacter pylori was evaluated in each patient by rapid urease test and histology (Giemsa). Gastritis was classified according to the Sydney System. Statistical analysis was performed by chi-square, Fisher exact or t test and logistic regression analysis. A p value <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection was found to be significantly higher in diabetics than in controls. The prevalence rate of endoscopic lesions was comparable in the two groups, but the association between endoscopic lesions and Helicobacter pylori infection was significantly higher in diabetics. Overall, the presence of chronic gastritis, both non atrophic and atrophic, as well as intestinal metaplasia were comparable in the two groups of patients, whilst the association between chronic gastritis and Helicobacter pylori infection or gastritis activity were significantly higher in diabetics. In neither group, was any correlation found between severity of dyspepsia and presence of endoscopic lesions, chronic gastritis or Helicobacter pylori infection. CONCLUSIONS: These data show a higher prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in diabetes mellitus patients with dyspepsia. Helicobacter pylori infection was significantly associated both with the presence of endoscopic lesions and chronic gastritis in diabetic patients, but not in the controls.     

Levofloxacin based triple therapy as a second-line treatment after failure of Helicobacter pylori eradication with standard triple therapy

BACKGROUND: Successful eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection after failure of standard triple therapy is difficult. The efficacy and safety of levofloxacin based triple therapy as a first-line therapy has-been studied. AIMS: The aim was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of levofloxacin based therapy after a failed standard triple therapy. PATIENTS: We conducted a prospective, uncontrolled study of a consecutive series of 33 patients who failed eradication with 1 week of lansoprazole-amoxicillin-clarithromycin triple therapy. METHODS: The subjects were retreated with 1 week of LA-LVFX triple therapy (lansoprazole, 30 mg twice daily; amoxicillin, 1000 mg twice daily: levofloxacin, 200 mg twice daily). Cure of infection was defined as negative results from culture, histology and a urea breath test 4 to 8 weeks after the second-line therapy. RESULTS: The eradication rate was 69.7% (23/33) by both intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses (95% confidence interval=61-79%). Seven (21.2%) patients experienced mild side-effects, such as soft stools and taste disturbance. No patient stopped the medication on account of adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: Levofloxacin based triple therapy is an effective second-line treatment after a failed standard triple therapy.