Adhesion to Er:YAG laser and bur prepared root and crown dentine

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the bond strengths between dentine and resin composite obtained after Er:YAG laser treatment of crown or root dentine used together with self‐etch and total‐etch adhesive systems. Methods: One etch‐and‐rinse adhesive (Single Bond, 3M, USA) and one self‐etch system (Clearfil SE Bond, Kuraray, Japan) were applied to root and crown dentine prepared with a regular bur in a turbine or with an Er:YAG laser. The shear bond strength was determined after thermocycling and statistically analysed using independent t‐tests. Results: Crown sites bonded using Clearfil SE Bond and Single Bond adhesives yielded bond strengths similar to that of root dentine sites (p > 0.05). Clearfil SE Bond was stronger in both the lased and non‐lased groups (p < 0.05). The lowest bond strength was obtained when Single Bond without acid etching was used on Er:YAG ablated dentine. When total‐etch adhesive was used, there were significant differences (p < 0.05) between the laser‐ablated and laser‐ablated/acid‐etched and bur‐cut/acid‐etched groups. Conclusions: Er:YAG laser irradiation of root and crown dentine conducted prior to the adhesive protocol adversely affected adhesion and decreased bond strength compared with traditional preparation.     

Relationship between composite fracture toughness and bond strengths to enamel and dentine

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the association between the fracture toughness of two nanofilled‐hybrid resin composites (Clearfil Majesty Esthetic [CME], Kuraray Medical, Japan; Estelite Σ [ES], Tokuyama, Japan) and their bond strengths to enamel and dentine mediated by a self‐etching primer system (Clearfil SE Bond [CSE]; Kuraray). Methods: Twenty‐four permanent human molars were sectioned into enamel and dentine specimens and finished with 600‐grit silicon carbide paper, bonded with CSE and either CME or ES, for μ‐shear bond strength (μSBS) and μ‐tensile bond strength (μTBS). The specimens were tested until failure at a cross‐head speed of 1 mm/min, failure loads recorded, bond strengths calculated and results analysed using independent samples t‐tests. Eight single‐notched bar‐shaped specimens, 30 mm × 5.2 mm × 2.2 mm, were prepared for each resin composite and fracture toughness measured using four‐point bending at a cross‐head speed of 0.5 mm/min. Results were analysed using independent samples t‐tests. Results: For μSBS and μTBS, there was no significant difference between the resin composites for enamel or dentine. The fracture toughness of CME was significantly higher than that of ES. Conclusions: For both enamel and dentine, resin composite fracture toughness affected neither μTBS nor μSBS to enamel or dentine.     

Push-out bond strengths of the dentine-sealer interface with and without a main cone

AIM: To evaluate the push-out bond strength of the dentine-sealer interface with and without main cone for three resin sealers. METHODOLOGY: Thirty extracted maxillary premolar teeth with two separate canals were prepared using 0.04 taper Profile instruments to size 35-45. Teeth were divided into three groups for filling using AH Plus, EndoREZ or Resilon sealers. In each tooth, one canal was filled with a matching single-cone technique, and other was filled with sealer alone. A 1 mm slice of mid-root dentine was prepared for the push-out test. Failure modes after push-out were examined under microscopy and field emission-scanning electron microscopy. Data were analysed using two-way anova and paired t-tests, with significance set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: Overall, the epoxy resin-based sealer provided the highest push-out bond strengths. Push-out bond strengths were significantly higher (P < 0.001) when canals were filled with sealer alone than those filled with main cone and sealer (AH Plus 6.6 and 2.0 MPa, respectively; Resilon 3.4 and 0.4 MPa; EndoREZ 0.9 and 0.4 MPa). Sealers appeared to behave differently as thin films in association with a main cone, compared with bulk material. They failed in cohesive mode within the thin film, leaving a layer of sealer on the canal surface. Bulk sealer showed predominantly adhesive failure at the dentine-sealer interface, with a clean dentine wall and with resin tags either partially pulled out or sheared off at the interface. CONCLUSION: Push-out bond strengths of resin sealers were much lower when the sealer was present as a thin layer.     

The effect of different sealer removal protocols on the bond strength of AH plus‐contaminated dentine to a bulk‐fill composite

The integrity of composite bonding for post‐endodontic restorations may be compromised by sealer contamination. This study assessed the effect of different sealer removal regimes on the bond strength of dentine to composite resin. Dentine surfaces were contaminated with AH Plus sealer (Dentsply DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany), followed by removal with either dry cotton pellets, cotton pellets saturated with 95% ethanol, AH Plus cleaner or external surface preparation. Dentine surfaces were not contaminated in a positive control group. A bulk‐fill composite (SDR; Dentsply) was bonded with Prime&Bond active universal adhesive (Dentsply) onto the prepared surface. Composite resin–dentine beams were produced, and tensile bond strength was determined using a universal testing machine. Using an etch‐and‐rinse adhesive, bond strengths varied from 21.34 to 29.11 MPa with no statistical differences among removal protocols. In conclusion, contamination by AH Plus sealer does not appear to substantially interfere with bond strength between dentine and a bulk‐fill composite/etch‐and‐rinse system.     

Bonding of Resin-based Sealers to Root Dentin

This study compared the microshear bond strength of three resin-based sealers to root dentin and assessed whether sealer cements behave differently in thin and thick films. Extracted maxillary premolars were sectioned buccolingually, and 45 root halves were randomly allocated for microshear bond testing with the three resin sealers in thin and thick films. The microshear bond strength was then calculated in MPa. Failure modes were examined under light and scanning electron microscopy. Data were analyzed by using analysis of variance, with significance set at p < 0.05. Overall, the epoxy resin-based sealers had the highest microshear bond strength to root dentin compared with urethane dimethacrylate–based sealers (p < 0.001). Bond strengths for the thick sealer group were significantly higher than the thin sealer group (p < 0.001) and may reflect different patterns of behavior when the sealer is present as a thin layer.     

Microtensile and tensile bond strength of single-bottle adhesives: a new test method

To evaluate the tensile and microtensile bond strength of five single-bottle adhesives to dentine, extracted human molar teeth were used. For each tooth dentine was exposed on the occlusal surface by cutting with an isomet saw and the remaining part was mounted in a plastic ring using dental stone. The tested adhesive materials were: Scotchbond 1, Syntac SC, One-Step, Prime & Bond 2.1 and Clearfil SE Bond. The adhesive was applied to either 1 mm(2) of dentine or a circular area with a diameter of 3.9 mm. Composite resin Clearfil AP-X was placed to the adhesives using a Teflon split mould 3.9 mm in diameter and 2.5 mm in height. Tensile and microtensile bond strengths were measured using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm min(-1). Under tensile mode, the bond strengths were 16.7 +/- 3.5, 15.2 +/- 2.5, 11.5 +/- 3.2, 13.7 +/- 2.6, 20.9 +/- 4.2 MPa for each material. Under microtensile mode, the bond strengths were 52.5 +/- 9.5, 55.3 +/- 8.3, 40.5 +/- 5.2, 37.5 +/- 8.7, 60 +/- 6.21 MPa. Fracture pattern of bonded specimens showed 66% cohesive dentine failure in samples tested for tensile bond strength. For the microtensile test, failures were mainly adhesive at the interface between adhesive and dentine (94%).     

The effects of dentine pretreatment on the adhesion of root-canal sealers

AIM: The adhesion of five root-canal sealers to dentine and gutta-percha was studied. The effects of various dentine pretreatments on adhesion were also investigated. METHODOLOGY: Root dentine cylinders, 4 mm in diameter, were prepared from human teeth. The dentine surfaces were conditioned with either 37% H(3)PO(4) for 30 s, 25% citric acid for 30 s, 17% EDTA for 5 min or a rinse with 10 mL distilled water (control). Gutta-percha cylinders, 4 mm in diameter, were prepared and their end surfaces polished flat. The dentine and gutta-percha surfaces were coated with freshly mixed sealer: Grossman's sealer (GS), Apexit (AP), Ketac-Endo (KE), AH Plus (AH), RoekoSeal Automix (RS) or RoekoSeal Automix with an experimental primer (RP). The surfaces were pressed together and the sealers allowed to set. The test specimens were subjected to a tensile force in a universal testing machine. RESULTS: Mean tensile bond strengths (MPa +/- SD) ranged from 0.07 +/- 0.01 (AP) to 1.19 +/- 0.47 (AH). Pretreatment with EDTA showed no effect or produced weaker bonds than controls. Phosphoric and citric acid pretreatments increased adhesion of GS. A primer used with RoekoSeal significantly enhanced its adhesion to untreated dentine. Inspection of fractured surfaces indicated failure of adhesion to dentine for GS and RS and to gutta-percha for KE and RP. The failure appeared to be mainly cohesive within the sealer for AH and AP. CONCLUSIONS: Removal of the smear layer may impair sealer adhesion to dentine. Different sealer types require different dentine pretreatments for optimal adhesion.     

The effect of calcium silicate-based sealer on the push-out bond strength of fibre posts

Background: The aim of this study was to assess the effect of the iRoot SP root canal sealer on the push‐out bond strength of fibre posts cemented with self‐adhesive resin cement. Methods:  Forty‐eight extracted maxillary incisors were randomly divided into four groups according to the tested sealer (n = 12): group 1 – control (only gutta‐percha points, no sealer); group 2 – AH Plus Jet (resin‐based sealer); group 3 – Endofill (zinc oxide‐eugenol‐based sealer); and group 4 – iRoot SP (calcium silicate‐based sealer). All root canals were filled with gutta‐percha, and groups 2–4 additionally received one of the sealers. Fibre posts were cemented with the self‐adhesive resin cement Clearfil SA Cement. The specimens were sectioned in the coronal, middle and apical regions, producing three slices of 1 mm thickness. The push‐out test was performed. All data were submitted to ANOVA and Tukey tests (α = 0.05). Results:  No statistically significant differences were found between the control group, AH Plus Jet and iRoot SP (p > 0.05). The Endofill sealer showed significantly lower bond strength compared to the other sealers and the control group (p < 0.05). Conclusions:  The calcium silicate‐based sealer did not adversely affect the bond strength of the fibre posts cemented with self‐adhesive resin cement.     

4种牙本质粘结剂剪切强度的实验研究

目的：通过4种牙本质粘结剂剪切强度的比较及粘结界面的超微结构的差异,评价并指导其临床使用。方法：选用新鲜的离体前磨牙40颗,分成4组暴露牙本质面。选用全酸蚀的粘结剂：PB（Prime ＆ bond NT）,自酸蚀的粘结剂：XN（XenoⅢ）、IB（IBond）、AP（Adper^TMPrompt^TM）,按照说明书的要求和步骤分别使用后充填复合树脂Z250,制备成4mm×3mm的圆柱型试件。所有的样本通过Instron测试剪切强度,用SPSS11.5对剪切强度测试值进行统计学分析。利用SEM观察粘结界面的超微结构。结果：方差分析显示材料AP的剪切强度最低且较材料PB差异在统计学上有显著性意义（P〈0.05）,材料PB、XN、IB的剪切强度差异上无统计学意义。SEM镜下,材料PB、XN、IB均可见有明显的树脂层、混合层、树脂突。结论：新一代的粘结剂XenoⅢ和IBond可应用于临床。     

Influence of dentinal regions on bond strengths of different adhesive systems

This in vitro study assessed comparatively the shear bond strengths of three composite resins, 3M Valux Plus (3MVP), Herculite (H), Clearfil AP-X (CAP-X), a polyacid modified composite resin Dyract (D), and a resin modified glass-ionomer materials Vitremer (V), to cervical and buccal dentine regions of extracted human molar teeth. Four different bonding systems, 3M ScotchBond Multipurpose (SB), Clearfil Liner Bond 2 (LB2), Opti Bond (OB), and Prime & Bond 2.1 (PB 2.1) were used with the manufacturer's respective composite and compomer materials. One hundred freshly extracted mandibular molar teeth were selected for this study. Flat buccal dentine surfaces were created on 50 teeth and cylindrical rods of the five materials were bonded to the dentine surfaces. For assessment of cervical bond strengths, the materials were bonded to mesial and distal enamel bordered occlusal dentinal surfaces of the remaining 50 teeth. The five groups of restorative procedures were applied as follows; Group 1: SB + 3MVP, Group 2: LB2 + CAP-X, Group 3: OB + H, Group 4: PB2.1 + D, Group 5: Vitremer primer (VP) VP + V. Each restorative procedure thus had 20 specimens (10 buccal + 10 cervical). After 24 h of water storage (37 degrees C), the specimens were tested on a Universal Testing machine in shear with a cross head speed of 0.5 mm min-1. The bond strength values were calculated in MPa and the results were evaluated statistically using Kruskal-Wallis one-way/anova and Mann-Whitney U-tests. It was found that the bond strengths of SB + 3MVP, LB2 + CAP-X and VP + V to buccal dentine surfaces were significantly stronger (P < 0.05) than those to the occluso-cervical dentine floors. When the bond strengths to the occluso-cervical dentine and buccal dentine surface were compared, there was no significant difference between the materials (P > 0.05). Vitremer was found the least successful adhesive material in terms of shear bond strength on both buccal and occluso-cervical dentine surfaces.     

The effect of repeated fluoride recharge and storage media on bond durability of fluoride rechargeable Giomer bonding agent

Background:  For a restorative material or adhesive to exhibit caries inhibitive potential through fluoride release, it must be capable of fluoride recharge. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of repeated fluoride recharge and different storage media on dentine bond strength durability. Methods:  Two self‐etch adhesive systems (two‐step) were evaluated: fluoride‐rechargeable Giomer FL‐Bond II and non‐fluoride‐containing UniFil Bond. For each adhesive 32 human dentine specimens were prepared for shear bond strength testing. The specimens were randomly allocated to one of four storage groups: Group 1 – 24‐hour water ageing; Group 2 – four‐month water ageing; Group 3 – four‐month water ageing with weekly fluoride recharge (5000 ppm for 10 minutes); and Group 4 – four‐month acid ageing with weekly fluoride recharge. Results:  Weekly fluoride recharge over four months ageing did not significantly (p > 0.05) reduce the dentine shear bond strength of FL‐Bond II or UniFil Bond. Storage media did not significantly (p > 0.05) affect bond durability. Conclusions:  The adhesion between fluoride rechargeable FL‐Bond II and dentine maintained durability despite regular fluoride recharge over the four months ageing. Clinicians prescribing the fluoride recharge regime used in the present study to reduce recurrent caries incidence associated with Giomer FL‐Bond II restorations can do so without compromising dentine bond strengths.     

Evaluation of the effect of MTAD in comparison with EDTA when employed as the final rinse on the shear bond strength of three endodontic sealers to dentine

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effect of MTAD in comparison with EDTA as a final rinse on the shear bond strength of Kerr, Apexit and AH plus. Dentine surfaces of 135 extracted human non-carious maxillary premolars were divided into three groups (n = 45). Groups I and II were conditioned with 1.3% NaOCl for 20 min, followed by a final rinse of 17% EDTA for 1 min and MTAD for 5 min respectively. Group III was treated with distilled water. Each group was further divided into three subgroups (n = 15). Subgroup 1: Kerr, Subgroup 2: Apexit and Subgroup 3: AH plus. Three-millimetre-long sections of polyethylene tubes were filled with freshly mixed sealer and placed on the dentine surfaces. The bonding between the sealer and dentine surface was evaluated using shear bond testing. The values were statistically evaluated using one way anova followed by Tukey's test. Significant difference was found among the bond strength of the sealers and irrigating regimes. AH plus showed superior bond strength among the tested sealers, when EDTA was employed as the final rinse (P < 0.05). MTAD as a final rinse affected the bond strength of AH plus and Apexit, which were significantly lower than the control group.     

Effect of gutta-percha solvents on the bond strength of two resin-based sealers to root canal dentin

Objective. To evaluate the effect of two gutta percha solvents on the bond strength of two resin-based sealers to root canal dentin. Materials and methods. Root canals of extracted single rooted human mandibular premolars (n = 60) were decoronated and instrumented with a rotary NiTi system to an apical size of 40 and randomly divided into three groups (n = 20) based on the chemical treatment: Group I, saline (control); group II, Xylene and group III, Endosolv E. All groups were divided into two sub-groups (n = 10) based on the root filling material: sub-group A, epoxy resin sealer (AH Plus); sub-group B, methacrylate resin sealer (Epiphany). Roots were then sectioned and push-out tests were performed. The data was analysed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and a multiple comparison test (p = 0.05). Results. There was a significant difference in bond strength of both sealers between the control and test groups (p < 0.05). The bond strength of the epoxy resin sealer (sub-group A) in group II was significantly lower than in group III (p < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference between groups II and III for the methacrylate resin sealer (sub-group b) (p > 0.05). Conclusions. Gutta Percha solvents had an adverse effect on bond strengths of resin sealers to root canal dentin. This was dependent on the chemistry of the solvent and the sealer.     

Regional bond strengths of resins to human root dentine

Objectives: The demand for restoration of root dentine defects such as cervical erosion and root caries has significantly increased recently, but there is limited information on the performance of the adhesive resins to radicular dentine. The purpose of this study was to measure the regional tensile bond strength (TBS) of composite bonded to human root and coronal dentine, and to observe the interface between resin and root dentine by SEM.

Methods: Human extracted cuspid teeth were used to measure TBS with a new microtensile bond test. Enamel and cementum were removed from the labial tooth surfaces to form a long cavity preparation into dentine from the mid-crown to the apex of the root within the same tooth. All Bond 2 (all etch technique) or Imperva Bond (no etch) was bonded to dentine surfaces and covered with Protect Liner resin composite. The resin-bonded teeth were serially sliced into 16 sections at right angles to the long axis of the tooth, and the bonded surfaces were trimmed to give a bonded surface area of 1 mm² for TBS testing.

Results: All Bond 2 bond strengths to coronal and apical dentine showed high values (23.5 MPa) but the bond strength was significantly lower on cervical root dentine. Imperva Bond produced a relatively high tensile bond strength to all regional areas. SEM showed that the thickness of the resin-infiltrated layer formed by All Bond 2 in root dentine was less than coronal areas. Resin infiltration with Imperva Bond was always less than 0.5 μm. The results suggest that high TBS values can be obtained with minimal resin infiltration in root dentine.     

The effect of thermal cycling on the bovine dentine shear bond strength of current adhesive systems

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of thermal cycling on shear bond strength to bovine dentine of four current adhesive systems. Forty bovine incisors were ground flat with #600-grit silicon carbide paper to obtain superficial coronal dentine surfaces. Three one-bottle (etch and rinse) adhesive systems (Single Bond, Bond 1, One Step), and one self-etching primer adhesive system (Clearfil Liner Bond 2V) were evaluated. Dentine was conditioned and bonded with the adhesive systems tested according to the manufacturers' instructions. A cylindrical teflon mould (3 x 4 mm) was placed over the bonded area (to eliminate the bonded surface) and filled with composite resin. For each adhesive system the filling composite used was from the same manufacturer. Ten specimens were prepared for each material and all specimens were conditioned at 37 degrees C for 24 h. Five specimens of each material (half of the specimens) were thermocycled at 5000 cycles (at 5, 37, 55 and 37 degrees C) with a dwell time of 15 s and bonds were stressed in shear at a rate of 0.5 mm min(-1) until failure. Data were analysed by one-way anova and Student-Newman-Keuls rank test (alpha=0.05). Statistical analysis revealed that thermal cycling significantly (P < 0.05) reduced the bond strengths of all adhesive systems. Bond strengths prior to thermocycling were not significantly different (P > 0.05), except for One Step which revealed the lowest bond strength, and varied from 22.5 +/- 3.34 to 10.98 +/-0.87 MPa. After thermal cycling, the bond strengths ranged from 9.35 +/- 1.13 to 6.06 +/- 1.77 MPa. Failures after testing and prior to thermal cycle were most commonly adhesive failures between the bonding resin and dentine associated with partial cohesive failures in the adhesive resin (type 2). Adhesive failures between bonding resin and dentin (type 1) after thermocycling were most commonly seen.     

Shear Bond Strength of Four Resin Cements Used to Lute Ceramic Core Material to Human Dentin

Purpose: This study evaluated the effect of four resin cements on the shear bond strength of a ceramic core material to dentin. Materials and Methods: One hundred twenty molar teeth were embedded in a self‐curing acrylic resin. The occlusal third of the crowns were sectioned under water cooling. All specimens were randomly divided into four groups of 30 teeth each according to the resin cement used. One hundred twenty cylindrical‐shaped, 2.7‐mm wide, 3‐mm high ceramic core materials were heat‐pressed. The core cylinders were then luted with one of the four resin systems to dentin (Super‐Bond C&B, Chemiace II, Variolink II, and Panavia F). Half of the specimens (n = 15) were tested after 24 hours; the other half (n = 15) were stored in distilled water at 37°C for 1 day and then thermocycled 1000 times between 5°C and 55°C prior to testing. Shear bond strength of each specimen was measured using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. The bond strength values were calculated in MPa, and the results were statistically analyzed using a two‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey HSD tests. Results: The shear bond strength varied significantly depending on the resin cement used (p < 0.05). The differences in the bond strengths after thermocycling were not remarkable as compared with the corresponding prethermal cycling groups (p > 0.05). Significant interactions were present between resin cement and thermocycling (p < 0.05). After 24 hours, the specimens luted with Variolink II (5.3 ± 2.2 MPa) showed the highest shear bond strength, whereas the specimens luted with Chemiace II (1.6 ± 0.4 MPa) showed the lowest. After thermocycling, the bond strength values of specimens luted with Chemiace II (1.1 ± 0.1 MPa) and Super‐Bond C&B (1.7 ± 0.4 MPa) decreased; however, this was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The increase in the shear bond strength values in the Panavia F (4.5 ± 0.7 MPa) and Variolink II (5.5 ± 2.1 MPa) groups after thermocycling was also not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Variolink II and Panavia F systems showed higher shear bond strength values than Chemiace II and Super‐Bond C&B. They can be recommended for luting ceramic cores to dentin surfaces.     

Influence of endodontic sealer cement on fibreglass post bond strength to root dentine

Aim To test the hypothesis that the composition of endodontic sealer cements and the time elapsed between root filling and fibreglass post fixation interferes with adhesion to root canal dentine. Methodology Sixty bovine incisor roots were divided into five groups (n = 12): CI, unfilled; SI, filled with a calcium hydroxide‐based cement‐Sealer 26, and immediate post fixation; S7, Sealer 26 and post fixation after 7 days; EI, filled with a zinc oxide and eugenol‐based cement‐Endofill and immediate fixation; and E7 Endofill and post fixation after 7 days. The posts were cemented with adhesive system and dual resin cement. Ten roots were cross‐sectioned to obtain two 1‐mm‐thick discs for each cervical (TC), middle (TM) and apical (TA) third of the prepared root portion. The posts were submitted to a micropush‐out test. The other two teeth were evaluated using scanning electron microscopy to analyse the bond interface. Data were analysed using anova , Tukey and Dunnett tests (P < 0.05). Results Group EI was associated with a significant reduction in bond strength values irrespective of the root region; TC = 3.50 MPa (P = 0.0001); TM = 2.22 MPa (P = 0.0043) and TA = 1.45 MPa (P = 0.003). Region of canal had an influence on the values for the cement used in group E7, in which only the TA presented differences from the CI. Conclusions Endofill interfered negatively with the bond to root dentine along its full length and in the TA when post fixation was delayed for 7 days. Bond strength decreased from crown to apex in all groups.     

Bond strength versus dentine structure: A modelling approach

Bond strengths of a hypothetical hydrophilic dentine-bonding agent were calculated as a function of dentine depth and resin strength to evaluate the importance of several variables in a simple model. The tested hypothesis was that the total bond strength was the sum of the strengths of resin tags, hybrid layer and surface adhesion. Each of these three variables has a range of values that can influence its relative contribution. The resulting calculations indicate the potential for higher bond strengths to deep dentine than to superficial dentine in non-vital dentine and the importance of resin strength in the development of strong bonds. Comparison of the calculated bonds with published values indicated that they were within the same order of magnitude. Such theoretical modelling of dentine bonding can identify the relative importance of variables involved in the substrate, resins and surface adhesion.     

Adhesion of root canal sealers to bovine dentine and gutta-percha

The adhesive properties of eight root canal sealers, applied as a thin layer between a dentine and a gutta-percha surface, were investigated. Tensile bond strengths ranged from 0.02 MPa (Sealpex) to 2.38 MPa (AH26). Inspection of fractured surfaces indicated failure of adhesion to dentine (Tubli-Seal) and to gutta-percha (AH26, Diaket) as well as failure of cohesion (CRCS, Kloroperka N-O, ProcoSol, rosin chloroform, Sealapex). Pretreatment of the dentine surface with EDTA caused a significant increase in bond strength for ProcoSol, rosin chloroform, Sealapex, and Tubli-Seal.     

Influence of Phosphoric Acid Etching on Bond Strength for Calcium Silicate-Based Sealers

IntroductionThis study evaluated the microtensile bond strength of calcium silicate-based sealers and epoxy resin-based sealer, depending on the use of phosphoric acid (PA) etching before immediate resin restoration.MethodsExposed dentin surfaces of extracted human third molars were randomly assigned to 3 groups depending on sealer type (AH Plus [Dentsply DeTrey], CeraSeal [Meta Biomed Co.], and EndoSeal MTA [Maruchi]). Half of the samples were treated with PA for 30 seconds, and the other half were cleaned with water. Completely untreated specimens were used as controls. Self-etching adhesive (Clearfil SE Bond, Kuraray) was applied and composite resin (Tetric N-Ceram, Ivoclar Vivadent) was used to create build-ups. After 24 hours, the microtensile bond strength was measured (EZ Test, Shimadzu Co.). The failure mode was determined by light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. One-way analysis of variance with the Bonferroni correction was used to analyze the data (P < .05).ResultsThe bond strength of the water-washed dentin surfaces in the calcium silicate-based sealer groups did not differ significantly from those of the control surfaces but the PA-pretreated surfaces exhibited relatively low-bond strength. The AH Plus-treated group had lower bond strength than the control group when no PA treatment was applied, but PA treatment restored the bond strength. The adhesive failure mode was most frequently found in the AH Plus group without PA etching.ConclusionsWhen a water-soluble calcium silicate-based sealer is used, sufficient bond strength can be obtained by washing with water alone, with no need for PA use.