Establishment of a composite resin inlay technique. Part 1. The effects of various curing modes on mechanical properties of composite resins

The effects of the curing mode on mechanical properties of composite resins were examined. Four resins as inlay, and three chemically-cured and five visible light-cured restorative resins were employed. The resin specimens were prepared by three kinds of curing modes; regular setting (according to the manufacturer's instruction), subsequently added light and heat curing after regular setting, and subsequently added heat and pressure curing after regular setting. Knoop hardness, flexure strength, compressive strength, and diametral tensile strength were determined. All restorative composites were remarkably increased in knoop hardness number due to the subsequently added curing methods. Both subsequently added curing methods provided higher flexure strength to all restorative resins, and particularly in the chemically-cured resins the flexure strength provided by the subsequently added light and heat curing was higher than those by the subsequently added heat and pressure curing. Compressive strength and diametral tensile strength were slightly increased by the subsequently added curing methods with the restorative resins. No correlation was found between the filler distribution and the mechanical properties provided by the subsequently added curing methods. The subsequently added heat curing seems to be preferable for creating higher mechanical properties of resins. The IC-2 resin, experimentally designed for resin inlay, seems to be the most promising resin for inlay restoration, based on the mechanical properties, and further detailed laboratory and clinical researches are required.     

Physical and mechanical properties of the thermosetting resin for crown and bridge cured by micro-wave heating

A heating method using micro-waves was utilized to obtain strong thermosetting resin for crown and bridge. The physical and mechanical properties of the thermosetting resin were examined. The resin was cured in a shorter time by the micro-waves heating method than by the conventional heat curing method and the working time was reduced markedly. The base resins of the thermosetting resin for crown and bridge for the micro-waves heating method were 2 PA and diluent 3 G. A compounding volume of 30 wt% for diluent 3 G was considered good the results of compressive strength, bending strength and diametral tensile strength. Grams of 200-230 of the filler compounded to the base resins of 2 PA-3 G system provided optimal compressive strength, bending strength and diametral tensile strength. A filler gram of 230 provided optimal hardness and curing shrinkage rate, the coefficient of thermal expansion became smaller with the increase of the compounding volume of the filler. The trial thermosetting resin for crown and bridge formed by the micro-waves heating method was not inferior to the conventional resin by the heat curing method or the light curing method.     

Mechanical properties of light-cured composites polymerized with several additional post-curing methods

This study determined the microhardness and diametral tensile strength of two hybrid resin composites submitted to conventional light curing, which were post-cured with different methods, and compared these data with the same data collected from one indirect resin composite. Two hybrid composites (TPH Spectrum and Filtek P60) and an indirect one (Solidex) were used. Conventional composites were polymerized with 1) conventional light curing for 40 seconds. Additional curing methods were applied with 2) laboratory multi-focal light curing for seven minutes, 3) microwave curing for five minutes at 500W, 4) oven curing for 15 minutes at 100 degrees C, 5) autoclave curing for 15 minutes at 100 degrees C and (6) were polymerized only with a laboratory light curing unit in three increments for three minutes and post-polymerized for seven minutes. The Solidex group was done following the manufacturers' instructions only. Diametral tensile strength and Knoop hardness tests were applied for all groups of five samples. Data were compared using ANOVA, Tukey and Student t-tests (p < 0.05). Post-curing methods increased the Knoop hardness and diametral tensile strength of conventional composites. In general, Filtek P60 showed higher hardness and diametral tensile strength values than TPH Spectrum resin. The Indirect resin composite showed poorer mechanical properties than conventional composites.     

Diametral tensile strength of four composite resin core materials with and without centered fiber dowels

This study evaluated the diametral tensile strength of composite resin core materials with and without fiber dowels. Eight groups were established (n = 20), four with composite resins and four with fiber dowels. Samples were tested using a universal testing machine and evaluated using scanning electron microscopy. One-way ANOVA and a Tukey B-rank order test (P = 0.05) indicated that the tensile values of two of the four composite resins decreased significantly when their matching fiber dowels were introduced.     

Diametral and compressive strength of dental core materials.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Strength greatly influences the selection of core materials. Many disparate material types are now recommended for use as cores. Cores must withstand forces due to mastication and parafunction for many years. PURPOSE: This study compared the compressive and diametral tensile strengths of 8 core materials of various material classes and formulations (light-cured hybrid composite, autocured titanium containing composite, amalgam, glass ionomer, glass ionomer cermet, resin-modified glass ionomer, and polyurethane). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Materials were manipulated according to manufacturers' instructions for use as cores. Mean compressive and diametral strengths with associated standard errors were calculated for each material (n = 10). Analyses of variance were computed (P <.0001) and multiple comparisons tests discerned many differences among materials. RESULTS: Compressive strengths varied widely from 61.1 MPa for a polyurethane to 250 MPa for a resin composite. Diametral tensile strengths ranged widely from 18.3 MPa for a glass ionomer cermet to 55.1 MPa for a resin composite. Some resin composites had compressive and tensile strengths equal to those of amalgam. CONCLUSION: Light-cured hybrid resin composites were stronger than autocured titanium containing composites. The strengths of glass ionomer-based materials and of a polyurethane material were considerably lower than for resin composites or amalgam.     

Physical and mechanical properties of anterior and posterior composite restorative materials

The physical and mechanical properties of two photo-cured anterior filling materials and a photo-cured posterior filling material have been compared with those of a conventional-cure resin composite. The properties of these materials were found to be dependent on their matrix resin compositions, filler contents, and filler particle sizes. One material with a low (50%) inorganic filler content of small particle size (0.04 micron) was found to have a lower mechanical strength with significantly higher water sorption and solubility characteristics than more heavily filled materials. A new hybrid photo-cured anterior composite with a smaller filler particle size was found to have comparable sorption and solubility behavior but a tensile strength superior to that of a conventional-cure composite. The superior properties of the new photo-cured systems are thought to result from their hybrid composite structures and the smaller filler particle sizes.     

Physical properties of light-cured opaque resin. (1) Influence of monomer composition

Light-cured opaque resins with excellent physical properties were prepared using five types of monomer liquid and titanium dioxide as the powder. The five opaque resin monomer liquid had the following monomer compositions. Methyl methacrylate (MMA)/di(methacryloxyethyl) trimethylhexamethylene diurethane (UDMA) = 70/30 (M-U), MMA/neopenthylglycol dimethacrylate (NPG)/UDMA = 45/45/10 (M-N-U), UDMA/MMA = 70/30 (U-M), 2,2-bis (4-methacryloxypolyethoxy phenyl) propane (2.6 E)/2,2-bis [4-(3-methacryloxy-2-hydroxy propoxy) phenyl] propane (Bis-GMA)/triethyleneglycol dimethacrylate (3 G) = 60/35/5(2.6-B-3) and 3 G/UDMA = 70/30 (3-U) by weight. The bond strength, photo-curability and handling properties of the opaque resin were improved. Three MMA-based opaque resins showed nearly the same values in Knoop hardness number, diametral tensile strength and shear bond strength. The depth of cure increased with the decrease in MMA content of monomer composition, while the amount of residual monomer decreased. The 2.6-B-3 opaque resin had nearly the same properties in depth of cure and Knoop hardness number as the 3-U opaque resin. However, the 2.6-B-3 and 3-U opaque resins had a diametral tensile strength more than twice as high as that of the U-M opaque resin. The bond strength of three MMA-based opaque resins showed 0MPa after 5,000 thermocycles, while the 2.6-B-3 opaque resin, about 16 MPa, and the 3-U opaque resin, about 25 MPa. Therefore, the bond strength of the opaque resin was influenced by monomer composition. 3G-UDMA opaque resin showed excellent physical properties and may be clinically acceptable to bond fixed prosthodontic composite.     

Laboratory strength of glass ionomer cement, compomers, and resin composites

PURPOSE: The study evaluates the compressive, flexural, and diametral tensile strengths of 8 core build-up materials from different material classes (highly viscous glass ionomer cement, autocured resin composite, and compomers). MATERIALS AND METHODS: All materials were manipulated according to the manufacturers' recommendations for use as core materials. At a temperature of 23.0 +/- 1.0 degrees C the properties of compressive, diametral tensile and flexural strength were determined using a universal testing machine at 15 minutes, 1 hour, and 24 hours after material preparation. Using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), multiple mean value comparisons were performed to determine significant differences (p< or =.05) between the core restoration materials. RESULTS: The values for compressive strength varied from 40.3 +/- 5.2 MPa (compomer) to 237.4 +/- 37.3 MPa (autocured resin composite) for the 3 measurement times. At 15 minutes, 1 hour, and 24 hours after first mixing, the ANOVA showed significant differences (p < or =.05) between the resin composite Core Paste and all of the other materials. Diametral tensile strengths ranged from 5.5 +/- 1.1 MPa for glass ionomer cement to 39.1 +/- 2.9 MPa for composite core material. Three-point flexural strength showed values ranging from 12.1 +/- 2.5 MPa for glass ionomer cement to 92.1 +/- 9.7 MPa for compomer between the 3 measurement times. CONCLUSIONS: Setting time influences the mechanical properties of the materials tested in this study. Autopolymerizing resin composite Core Paste demonstrated greater compressive and flexural strengths at the 3 measurement times than the other materials tested. Reinforced composites, in comparison to the autocured resin composites, yielded no improvement in tensile strength. Flexural and tensile strengths of the glass ionomer cement were lower than those of autocured resin composites and compomers.     

Mechanical properties of three composite resins for the inlay/onlay technique.

The present study measured the diametral compressive strength, flexural strength, and modulus of elasticity of composite resins used in inlay/onlay systems. The effect of additional curing also was determined. SR-Isosit material had the highest diametral compressive strength, and SR-Isosit-Dentin material had the lowest flexural strength. The SR-Isosit composite resins had lowest elastic modulus and Estilux posterior C VS resin the highest. A negative correlation was found between diametral compressive strength and elastic modulus of the materials. It was concluded that the additional curing of Brilliant resin did not result in improved mechanical properties. For Estilux resin, additional curing increased flexural strength and modulus of elasticity.     

Selected mechanical properties of fluoride-releasing restorative materials

Mechanical properties, diametral tensile strength (DTS) and flexural strength (FS) of six fluoride releasing materials were measured and compared. The samples were prepared and tested according to ISO specifications. The materials included a glass ionomer (Fuji IX), a resin-modified glass ionomer (Photac-Fil), two compomers (F 2000; Dyract AP) and two composites (Solitaire; Tetric Ceram). The tests were performed after the materials were stored in distilled water (DTS) and phosphate buffered saline solution (FS) at 37 degrees C for 24 hours and one week. Fluoride-releasing composite resin had the highest flexural and diametral tensile strengths and were statistically stronger than compomers, followed by resin-modified glass ionomer and conventional glass ionomer. However, a notable exception to this general trend was Solitaire, a fluoride-releasing composite resin.     

An in vitro study of the tensile strength of composite resins repaired with the same or another composite resin

Interfacial tensile bond strengths of self-cured and light-activated composite resins, repaired with the same or another composite resin were measured. The bond strengths were measured as a function of age of the substrate or as a function of the adhered surface treatment. One control group of solid resin samples was tested for tensile strength. Other groups of specimens, matured for 48 hours, 7 days, and 1 year, were cut in half and ground flat before a fresh mass of composite resin was added. Six groups were coated with a thin layer of intermediate resin or bonding agent before the fresh composite resin was added. In general, the repaired composite resins revealed lower strength than did the cohesive samples, with bond strengths ranging from 19% to 52% of the strengths of the unrepaired resins. The intermediate resin increased the bond strength in all cases.     

The effects of eugenol and epoxy-resin on the strength of a hybrid composite resin

The compatibility of different dental materials (root canal sealer and composite core build-up restoratives) is an important factor for a successful restoration. The aim of this in vitro study was to determine the effects on compressive and diametral tensile strength of a classical chemical cure composite resin (Henry Schein Composite Anterior-Posterior dental restorative) when in contact with either eugenol or an epoxy-resin (EZ-Fill) in a variety of situations: (a) eugenol or epoxy-resin added during mixing of a composite resin before curing; (b) vapor exposure to cured samples; and (c) specimens placed directly in eugenol or epoxy-resin (after curing). Compressive strengths and diametral tensile strengths were tested for each group. Only the addition of eugenol during mixing with the composite resin (directly before curing) resulted in specimens that were unable to be tested, because they did not achieve a full cure or hardness. For all other groups, there were no significant differences with respect to either compressive strength (p = 0.17) or diametral tensile strength (p = 0.39). Group 1 (mixed directly with eugenol) was found to be statistically different from groups 2 through 7.     

Interfacial bond strengths between layers of visible light-activated composites

The bond strengths between composite layers either cured to themselves or to other types (classes) of composites of similar or different brands were measured by using a direct tensile test (true tension). The diametral compression test for tension for each material tested was also conducted according to ADA specification No. 27. The values were used for comparison. 1. The interfacial bond strengths were generally found to be higher than the cohesive strengths of the weaker materials when cured to different types of composites or of the weak region in the specimen when composites were cured to themselves. 2. The cohesive tensile failure of the materials occurred at much lower stress levels than their corresponding diametral tensile strength (ranging from 1/4 to 1/3 of the diametral strength). 3. When two types of composites were bonded together the cohesive failure occurred consistently within the materials with lower diametral strength. Correlation was observed between the values of cohesive strength of material measured with true tension and the diametral test. 4. A urethane dimethacrylate microfilled composite bonded weakly to BIS-GMA composite, therefore, their combined use should be avoided. 5. Incremental placement produced a clinically acceptable bond strength because it exceeded or was at least comparable to the cohesive strength of the material.     

PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF COMPOSITES CURED WITH CONVENTIONAL LIGHT OR ARGON LASER

Objective : This study evaluated various physical properties of two resin composites polymerized by either an argon laser or a conventional visible light. Materials and Methods : A hybrid composite, Herculite XRV (Kerr Corp., Orange, California), and a microfill composite, Durafill VS (Kulzer, Wehrheim, Germany), were used in this study. Three physical properties, diametral tensile strength, compressive strength, and flexural strength, were tested. Five specimens of each composite resin were made for each set of physical properties tested, for a total of 18 groups and 90 specimens. Specimens were fabricated according to the American National Standards Institute and American Dental Association Specification No. 27 for each property tested. The composite was polymerized with either an argon laser (power density of 1000 mW/cm²) for 10 or 20 seconds or a conventional visible light (power density of 354 mW/cm2) for 40 seconds. Specimens were stored in water in light‐proof containers at 37°C for 7 days before testing with a Zwick (Atlanta, Georgia) universal testing machine. Results : The physical properties of Herculite XRV were not affected by the light source or exposure time. For Durafill VS, no significant differences were observed for the diametral tensile strength whether the argon laser or conventional light was used. However, the flexural strength of the microfill was significantly lower when polymerized with the argon laser a t 10 seconds compared with the two other curing methods (20‐second laser cure, 40‐second conventional cure). Also, the compressive strength of Durafill VS polymerized with the argon laser a t 10 seconds was significantly lower than when it was cured with the conventional light for 40 seconds. Conclusions : Hybrid and microfill resin composites cured with an argon laser for 20 seconds had physical properties comparable to composites polymerized with a conventional visible light unit for 40 seconds. Therefore, with adequate exposure time, the argon laser is a potential alternative to conventional visible light‐curing.     

In Vitro Evaluation of Five Core Materials

PURPOSE: This in vitro study determined the fracture strength of five core materials supported by two different endodontic dowels. Diametral tensile strength and microhardness of the three resin composite core materials used in this study were also tested. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The fracture strength study used one lanthanide-reinforced flowable resin composite (Ti-Core Auto E), one titanium- and lanthanide-reinforced composite (Ti-Core), one lanthanide-reinforced composite (Ti-Core Natural), and two metal-reinforced glass ionomer core materials (Ketac Silver and GC Miracle Mix). Two types of dowels were used: a multitiered, split-shank threaded dowel with a flange (#1 Flexi-Flange) and one without a flange design (#1 Flexi-Post). The specimens were divided into ten groups. Each tooth/dowel and core specimen was placed in a special jig at 45 degrees and subjected to a load by a universal testing machine. The diametral tensile strength and the microhardness of the three resin composite core materials were measured by a universal testing machine and Barcol hardness tester, respectively. All test groups contained ten specimens. RESULTS: The fracture strength value of the resin composite core materials was significantly larger ( p < 0.0001) than those for the metal-reinforced glass-ionomer core materials. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) also showed that the Flexi-Flange dowel interacted with Ti-Core and Ti-Core Auto E to significantly ( p < 0.0013) increase the fracture strength relative to the Flexi-Post. One-way ANOVA revealed that there were no significant differences between them in terms of diametral tensile strength. The Barcol hardness values of the composite core materials were statistically different ( p < 0.0001), with the Ti-Core the highest, followed by Ti-Core Natural, then Ti-Core Auto E. CONCLUSIONS: Resin composite core material performed better than glass ionomer material in this in vitro study. The flowable composite core material performed about the same in terms of fracture strength and diametral tensile strength compared with nonflowable composites. Combined with certain core materials, the flange design increased the fracture strength of the tooth/dowel and core combination.     

A novel CAD/CAM resin composite block with high mechanical properties

ObjectiveTo determine the mechanical properties of a newly-developed CAD/CAM resin composite block and compare with other resin composite blocks and a polymer-infiltrated ceramic block.MethodsExperimental composite block was formulated by our proprietary resin and filler technologies and cured via Hot Isostatic Pressing (HIP). Bar-shaped specimens (1 × 4×12 ? 13 mm, n = 10) for flexural strength, flexural modulus and modulus of resilience were sectioned from block materials and measured in accordance to modified ISO-6872. Cylinder specimens for compressive strength (2 × 4 mm, n = 8) and for diametral tensile strength (6 × 3 mm, n = 8) were milled from the block materials and tested according to ASTM-D695 and ANSI/ADA-Specification #27, respectively. Block specimens (5 mm, n = 3) for Vickers hardness were polished and measured for five indentations on each specimen. The data was analyzed by one-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey tests (p ≤ 0.05).ResultsExperimental composite block showed higher or significantly higher flexural strength, flexural modulus, modulus of resilience, compressive strength, diametral tensile strength and Vickers hardness than the other commercially available block materials except Vita Enamic for flexural modulus and hardness and Cerasmart for modulus of resilience. Some positive correlations were observed among the different mechanical properties.SignificanceNew composite block exhibited higher mechanical properties as compared to commercially available composite block materials. Superior mechanical properties for resin composite block materials were obtained by composite and curing processing technologies. Resin composite blocks with higher mechanical properties are good options for the fabrication of CAD/CAM indirect restorations.     

Diametral tensile strength of composite resins submitted to different activation techniques

The aim of this study was to evaluate the diametral tensile strength (DTS) of composite resins submitted to different curing techniques. Four composite resins were tested in this study: Targis (Ivoclar), Solidex (Shofu), Charisma (Heraeus-Kulzer) and Filtek Z250 (3M Espe). Sixty-four cylindrical specimens were prepared and divided into eight groups according to each polymerization technique (n = 8). The indirect composite resins (Targis and Solidex) were polymerized with their respective curing systems (Targis Power and EDG-lux); Charisma and Filtek Z250 were light-cured with conventional polymerization (halogen light) and additionally, with post-curing systems. Specimens were stored in artificial saliva at 37 degrees C for one week. DTS tests were performed in a Universal Testing Machine (0.5 mm/min). The data were statistically analyzed by ANOVA and Duncan tests. The results were (MPa): Z250/EDG-lux: 69.04 feminine; Z250/Targis Power: 68.57 feminine; Z250/conventional polymerization: 60.75b; Charisma/Targis Power: 52.34c; Charisma/conventional polymerization: 49.17c; Charisma/EDG-lux: 47.98c; Solidex: 36.62d; Targis: 32.86d. The results reveal that the post-cured Z250 composite resin showed the highest DTS means. Charisma composite presented no significant differences when activation techniques were compared. Direct composite resins presented higher DTS values than indirect resins.     

The physical properties of a machinable resin composite for esthetic restorations

To investigate the pre-clinical relevancy of a machinable composite, its physical properties were evaluated and compared with a machinable ceramic and two indirect composites. A machinable resin composite (GN-I composite, CO), a machinable ceramic (GN-I ceramic, CE), and two resin composites (Artglass dentin, AG; Estenia dentin, ET) were used. Compressive strength, diametral tensile strength, flexural strength, elastic modulus, and fracture load of standardized, premolar crown-shaped specimens were determined. In terms of compressive strength, diametral tensile strength, and flexural strength, AG showed significantly lower values than the other three materials. In terms of fracture load, specimens with 1.5 mm thick wall showed a higher value than those with 1.0 mm thick wall, and the value decreased in the order of ET, CE, CO, and AG. Marginal tipping was also observed in ET and CE. Within the limits of the current study, CO showed physical properties favorable for constructing esthetic restorations.     

Comparative study of the physical properties of core materials

This study was undertaken to measure physical properties of materials used for direct core buildups, including high-copper amalgam, visible light-cured resin composite, autocured titanium-containing composite, polyacid-modified composite, resin-modified glass-ionomer, and silver cermet cement. Compressive strength, diametral tensile strength, and flexural strength of six core materials of various material classes were measured for each material as a function of time up to 3 months at different storage conditions, using a standard specification test designed for the materials. Three different storage conditions (dry, humid, wet) at 37 degrees C were chosen. Materials were manipulated according to manufacturers' instructions for use as cores. Mean compressive, diametral tensile, and flexural strengths with associated standard deviations were calculated for each material. Multiple comparison and Newman-Keuls tests discerned many differences among materials. All materials were found to meet the minimum specification requirements, except in terms of flexural strength for amalgam after 1 hour and the silver cermet at all time intervals.     

Hardness and diametral tensile strength of a hybrid composite resin polymerized with different modes and immersed in ethanol or distilled water media

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the microhardness and diametral tensile strength of a hybrid composite resin (Z250, 3M ESPE) polymerized with four different modes of light exposure and immersed in two different media. METHODS: Composite resin specimens were randomly polymerized according to the experimental groups (conventional, 550 mW/cm(2)/30 s; soft start, 300 mW/cm(2)/10 s + 550 mW/cm(2)/20 s; high intensity, 1060 mW/cm(2)/10 s; pulse delay, 550 mW/cm(2)/1 s + 60 s of waiting time + 550 mW/cm(2)/20 s) and immersed in one of two media (distilled water or absolute ethanol) for 24 h. After that, microhardness (M) and diametral tensile strength (DTS) tests were performed. RESULTS: For DTS, there were no statistical differences among the polymerization modes, however, ethanol medium groups presented statistically lower DTS (p < 0.05) than water medium. For the M test, samples immersed in ethanol medium presented lower M for almost all groups. Conventional mode presented higher M values for the groups immersed in water medium. In ethanol medium, conventional and pulse delay groups presented higher M values, statistically different (p < 0.05) from the high intensity group. For all experimental conditions, the top surface showed higher M than the bottom surface. SIGNIFICANCE: Different polymerization modes can be related to the different polymer structures formed, and consequently with different physical properties of resin composite. The immersion media can alter the physical properties of resin composites of different polymer structures.