Effects of environment and lifestyle on gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is comprised of a spectrum of related disorders, including hiatal hernia, reflux disease with its associated symptoms, erosive esophagitis, peptic stricture, Barrett's esophagus, and esophageal adenocarcinoma. Besides multiple pathophysiological associations among these disorders, they are also characterized by their comorbid occurrence in identical patients and by their similar epidemiologic behavior. The occurrence of GERD is shaped by marked temporal and geographic variations, suggesting the influence of environmental risk factors in the etiology of these diseases. VARIATIONS BY TIME, GEOGRAPHY, AND RACE: Between 1975 and 2005, the incidence of GERD and esophageal adenocarcinoma increased fivefold in most Western countries. The incidence of GERD also appears to be rising in the most developed countries of Asia. All severe forms of GERD, such as erosive esophagitis, peptic stricture, Barrett's metaplasia, and esophageal adenocarcinoma, are more common among whites than other ethnic groups. AFFLUENCE AND OBESITY AS RISK FACTORS: Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma tend to occur slightly more often in subjects with higher income. Overweight and obesity contribute to the development of hiatal hernia, increase intra-abdominal pressure, and promote gastroesophageal reflux. Weight gain increases reflux symptoms, whereas weight loss decreases such symptoms. Other risk factors, such as smoking, alcohol, dietary fat, or drugs, play only a minor role in shaping the epidemiologic patterns of GERD. PROTECTION THROUGH HELICOBACTER PYLORI: On a population level, a high prevalence of H. pylori infection is likely to reduce levels of acid secretion and protect some carriers of the infection against reflux disease and its associated complications. Several studies have confirmed a lesser prevalence of H. pylori among subjects with than without GERD. Until recently, populations in Africa and Asia may have been protected against the development of GERD and esophageal adenocarcinoma by their higher prevalence of H. pylori infection. CONCLUSION: The study of environmental risk factors may provide an opportunity to better understand GERD and develop a means of its prevention.     

Comparison of reflux esophagitis and its complications between African Americans and non-Hispanic whites

AIM： To determine the effect of ethnicity on the severity of reflux esophagitis （RE） and its complications.
METHODS： A retrospective search of the endoscopy database at the University of Florida Health Science Center/Jacksonville for all cases of reflux esophagitis and its complications from January 1 to March 31, 2001 was performed. Inclusion criteria were endoscopic evi- dence of esophagitis using the LA classification, reflux related complications and self-reported ethnicity. The data obtained included esophagitis grade, presence of a hiatal hernia, esophageal ulcer stricture and Barrett＇s esophagus, and endoscopy indication.
RESULTS： The search identified 259 patients with RE or its complications, of which 171 were non-Hispanic whites and 88 were African Americans. The mean ages and male/female ratios were similar in the two groups. RE grade, esophageal ulcer, stricture and hiatal hernia frequency were likewise similar in the groups. Barrett＇s esophagus was present more often in non-Hispanic whites than in African Americans （15.8% vs 4.5%; P 〈 0.01）. Heartburn was a more frequent indication for endoscopy in non-Hispanic whites with erosive esophagitis than in African Americans （28.1% vs 7.9%; P 〈 0.001）.
CONCLUSION： Distribution of RE grade and frequency of reflux-related esophageal ulcer, stricture and hiatal hernia are similar in non-Hispanic whites and African Americans. Heartburn was more frequently and nausea/vomiting less frequently reported as the primary endoscopic indication in non-Hispanic whites compared with African Americans with erosive esopha- gitis or its complications. African Americans have a decreased prevalence of Barrett＇s esophagus compared with non-Hispanic whites.     

Specialized intestinal metaplasia of the distal esophagus in gastroesophageal reflux disease: prevalence and clinico-demographic features

BACKGROUND: Specialized intestinal metaplasia can be categorized according endoscopic and histological findings in long segment Barrett, short segment Barrett and specialized intestinal metaplasia of cardia. Barrett's esophagus is an acquired disease that is found in about 10%-13% of patients undergoing endoscopy for symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease and it is well established as predisposing to esophageal adenocarcinoma. The columnar epithelium with goblet cells replaces the normal squamous epithelium. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence and clinical-demographic characteristics of specialized intestinal metaplasia of distal esophagus in the gastroesophageal reflux disease. METHODS: From April to October 2002, 402 patients referred to upper endoscopy due gastroesophageal reflux disease were evaluated through of a symptom questionnaire about clinical and demographic features and submitted to upper endoscopy with four-quadrant biopsies 1 cm below escamocolumnar junction. RESULTS: Eighteen point four percent of patients had specialized intestinal metaplasia, 0.5% long segment Barrett esophagus, 3.2% short segment Barrett's esophagus and 14.7% specialized intestinal metaplasia of cardia. Patients with Barrett's esophagus showed a tendency to be male and specialized metaplasia of cardia to be female. All patients with Barrett's esophagus were white. There was not association between symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease and specialized intestinal metaplasia, but patients with Barrett's esophagus showed a tendency to have symptoms over 5 years and had more hiatal hernia and esophagitis. The use of alcohol and tobacco was not related to the presence of specialized intestinal metaplasia. CONCLUSIONS: Barrett's esophagus was more related to the male gender, gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms for 5 years or longer, more intense esophagitis and hiatal hernia, but was not related to the use of tobacco and alcohol.     

Barrett's esophagus in scleroderma: increased prevalence and radiographic findings

Ten of 27 patients (37%) with scleroderma who underwent endoscopy at our hospital between 1980 and 1984 for symptoms of reflux esophagitis had biopsy-proven Barrett's esophagus. Two of those 10 patients had esophageal adenocarcinomas. In a blinded review of esophagrams (all but 2 using double-contrast technique) from 16 of the 27 patients, only 1 patient was thought to be at high risk for Barrett's esophagus due to a high esophageal stricture with an adjacent reticular pattern of the mucosa. The latter patient had biopsy-proven Barrett's mucosa. Eight patients were thought to be at moderate risk for Barrett's esophagus due to reflux esophagitis and/or distal strictures in 6 and polypoid intraluminal masses in 2. Three of the 6 patients with esophagitis and/or strictures had Barrett's esophagus, and both patients with masses had adenocarcinomas arising in Barrett's mucosa. Finally, 7 patients who had no esophagitis or strictures were thought to be at low risk for Barrett's esophagus. None of those 7 had histologic evidence of Barrett's mucosa. Thus, the major value of double-contrast esophagography is its ability to classify patients into high-, moderate-, and low-risk for Barrett's esophagus to determine the relative need for endoscopy and biopsy in these patients.     

Barrett's esophagus: prevalence and size of hiatal hernia

OBJECTIVE: Barrett's esophagus is caused by gastroesophageal reflux and predisposes to adenocarcinoma. Hiatal hernia may cause reflux. The prevalence and size of hernias in patients with Barrett's esophagus was investigated. METHODS: Axial hernia length and the width of the diaphragmatic hiatus were measured prospectively at endoscopy. RESULTS: A 2-cm or longer hernia was found in 96% of 46 patients with Barrett's esophagus, in 42% of 103 controls (p < 0.001), and in 72% of 18 patients with short segment Barrett's esophagus (p < 0.05 vs controls). A hernia was found in 71% of 31 controls with esophagitis and in 29% of 72 controls without esophagitis (p < 0.001). Of 54 controls with neither esophagitis or reflux symptoms, 20% had a hernia. Mean hernia length was 3.95 cm in Barrett's esophagus, and 2.81 cm in controls (p < 0.005). Mean hiatus width was 3.52 cm in patients with Barrett's esophagus and hernia, and 2.24 cm in controls with hernia. Hernia length was similar in patients with and without esophagitis, and in short segment Barrett's esophagus. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with Barrett's esophagus have hiatal hernia; their hernias are longer and the hiatal openings wider than in controls with or without esophagitis. Hiatal hernia likely contributes to the development of Barrett's esophagus.     

Barrett's esophagus: a review

Barrett's esophagus may be defined as a columnar epithelium-lined distal esophagus. As a frequently recognized complication of gastroesophageal reflux, Barrett's esophagus has become a diagnosis of general clinical concern. Factors governing the development of this complication in patients with gastroesophageal reflux are unknown but may be congenitally determined in part. When symptoms are present, they are due to the complications of reflux, such as esophagitis, stricture, ulcer, or bleeding. Barrett's esophagus may be suspected on the basis of results of a barium meal test, endoscopy, or isotope scanning. Iodine staining at endoscopy or manometrically guided biopsy helps to localize the abnormal mucosal segment. The diagnosis is proved by biopsy. The columnar epithelium of Barrett's esophagus has a malignant predisposition, and, once the diagnosis is made, periodic endoscopy, with biopsy and cytologic study, is indicated. The treatment of Barrett's esophagus is directed toward objective cessation of gastroesophageal reflux. In refractory cases, antireflux surgery improves symptoms and complications from reflux, but the columnar epithelium generally persists along with its malignant potential. It is not known whether effective antireflux treatment will lower the incidence of adenocarcinoma.     

Esophageal strictures and lower esophagus lined with columnar epithelium

Radiographic, manometric, simultaneous radiographic-manometric, endoscopic, histologic and gastric secretory studies were performed on 12 consecutive patients with a benign peptic esophageal stricture. All patients had a segment of esophagus lined with columnar epithelium below the stricture and a small hiatal hernia. Four of them had a normotensive competent gastroesophageal sphincter and no evidence for reflux. Eight patients had free gastroesophageal reflux through a weak, incompetent sphincter. Esophagitis was not universally present. The type of heterotopic mucosa as well as the gastric secretory values showed no uniform pattern. Four patients with a fundic type of epithelium in the lower esophagus had discrete esophageal ulcers, but only 2 of them had evident gastroesophageal reflux. Local secretion of gastric juice seems to play a role in the genesis of these ulcers. There are strong arguments in favor of a congenital heterotopic mucosal lining in the lower esophagus in some patients, although a contributing role for reflux esophagitis cannot be excluded in others.     

The prevalence of Barrett's esophagus in patients with chronic peptic esophageal strictures

Both Barrett's esophagus and peptic stricture of the esophagus are consequences of chronic reflux esophagitis. Barrett's esophagus appears to be a premalignant condition, and continued histologic surveillance for dysplasia and carcinoma has been recommended for affected patients. While patients with peptic esophageal strictures and persistent reflux are at risk for the development of Barrett's epithelium, such patients often do not receive continued histologic surveillance if Barrett's epithelium is not identified on the initial endoscopic evaluation. Using endoscopic and peroral aspiration biopsy techniques, we studied the prevalence of Barrett's esophagus in 25 patients with chronic peptic esophageal strictures in whom Barrett's epithelium had not been identified previously. We found Barrett's esophagus in 11 (44%) of our 25 patients. One patient who did not have Barrett's esophagus was found to have an undifferentiated esophageal carcinoma. We conclude that patients with chronic peptic esophageal strictures frequently have Barrett's esophagus. A program of continued histologic surveillance seems advisable for such patients.     

Chronic esophagitis in two sisters

Two sisters developed symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux and gastric stasis during adolescence. Both developed severe erosive esophagitis and epithelial hyperplasia of the esophagus before 35 years of age. Both had a hiatal hernia, and esophageal motor function was poor in both. One of the sisters had also a peptic stricture of the esophagus, the other one a gastric bezoar. Jejunal motility was normal in both. Among 28 close family members surveyed, seven additional individuals out of three generations had frequent and severe reflux symptoms since adolescence. It is unlikely that the occurrence of chronic esophagitis at such young age in the two sisters is mere coincidence. It is conceivable that the two sisters and their family shared a defect similar to the one that has previously been made responsible for the familial occurrence of hiatal hernias and Barrett's esophagus.     

Barrett's Esophagus

Barrett's esophagus was diagnosed in 26 men in a five-year period by demonstrating esophageal specialized columnar epithelium in target biopsies obtained at endoscopy or in peroral suction biopsies of the esophageal mucosa. The clinical, radiologic and manometric features of these patients were reviewed retrospectively. Esophageal lesions associated with this epithelium included distal and midesophageal strictures and ulcers, alone or in combination, or simply esophagitis. One patient had an associated adenocarcinoma. Twenty of 26 (77%) had heartburn or regurgitation, 16 (62%) had easily elicited reflux of barium while supine and 16 of 17 tested had lower esophageal sphincter pressure in the incompetent range. Ninety-six percent had one or more of these parameters positive. This series demonstrates a wide spectrum of esophageal lesions in Barrett's esophagus, and supports the concept that this lesion occurs as a consequence of gastroesophageal reflux and erosive esophagitis. The case of adenocarcinoma in this series adds to the concern that the columnar lined lower esophagus may be a premalignant lesion.     

Barrett's esophagus. A prevalent, occult complication of gastroesophageal reflux disease

A prospective study of patients with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux was undertaken to determine the prevalence of Barrett's esophagus and reevaluate the diagnostic approach necessary to detect this complication. Endoscopy with mucosal biopsy was performed in 97 subjects. Twelve (12.4%) were found to have Barrett's esophagus. The sensitivity and specificity of the endoscopic and radiologic examinations for Barrett's esophagus were prospectively evaluated. Endoscopy (92%) was significantly more sensitive than radiology (24%) in detecting Barrett's esophagus (p less than 0.001). The frequency and severity of reflux symptoms among patients determined to have Barrett's esophagus, reflux esophagitis, or normal esophageal biopsies were quantitatively similar in all three groups, except for significantly greater daytime heartburn in those with reflux esophagitis (p less than 0.01). These data indicate that Barrett's esophagus complicates gastroesophageal reflux more often than previously believed.     

GERD and complications: when is surgery necessary?

Esophagitis, ulcer with potential for bleeding and peptic stenosis are typical complications of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Whereas GERD is frequent with symptom prevalence of 30 % in the normal population, ulcer and peptic stenosis have become very rare. Consequently surgical interventions due to these complications are only necessary in exceptional cases. After successful bougienage and response to adequate medical treatment, surgical indications for peptic stenosis or ulcer are not different to those for other forms of reflux disease. GERD patients with a "short esophagus" and axial hiatal hernia are difficult to treat either by medication or surgery. However, intrathoracic fundoplication may lead to acceptable results. Extraesophageal manifestations of GERD are caused by a severe reflux up to the cervical esophagus. The resulting laryngitis or pulmonary problems require antireflux surgery more often than in the absence of these symptoms. Long-standing reflux can lead to the development of Barrett mucosa, which represents a precancerous for esophageal adenocarcinoma and can be considered as a special complication of GERD. Retrospective data show that progression of Barrett mucosa or its malignant degeneration cannot be prevented by fundoplication. However, in a comparative study concerning low-grade neoplasia fundoplication leads to significantly more cases with regression than medication. High-grade neoplasia has to be removed in all cases. With regard to the prerequisite for correct indications the long-term results of endoscopic or surgical procedures are equal, but endoscopic mucosectomy is favoured due to its lower invasiveness. Indications for surgery by limited or radical esophagectomy are incomplete removal of neoplasia after mucosectomy, long Barrett's esophagus with multifocal lesions or suspicion of submucosal carcinoma.     

Esophagitis: incidence and risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma--a population-based cohort study

OBJECTIVES: Although symptoms of reflux are common, our knowledge of the epidemiology and natural history of gastroesophageal reflux disease is sparse. The risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma is increased among patients with acid reflux, but the contribution of Barrett's lesions is unknown. METHODS: With the aim to estimate the incidence of diagnosed endoscopic esophagitis lesions and the risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma among patients with previously diagnosed esophagitis, we extracted data on endoscopies, esophagitis diagnoses, and gastroesophageal cancer diagnoses from five population-based databases covering the period from 1974 to 2002, and covering all citizens in Funen County (population 470,000). RESULTS: In 2002, the incidence of esophagitis lesions was 2.4 per 1,000 person-years (95% confidence interval 2.3-2.6), 18.3 per 1,000 persons (17.9-18.7) had previously diagnosed esophagitis. Incidence increased by calendar year and age, was higher among males than among females, and was closely related to rate of endoscopy. Among 11,129 patients with previously diagnosed esophagitis, 15 had esophageal adenocarcinoma during 58,322 person-years of follow-up (26 per 100,000 person-years). The expected number was 2.79 and the standardized incidence ratio was 5.38 (3.01-8.87). Ten of the 15 patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma had previously diagnosed Barrett's esophagus. CONCLUSION: The risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma is increased fivefold in patients with previously diagnosed esophagitis, but most of the adenocarcinomas occurred among patients with Barrett's esophagus.     

Capsule endoscopy for screening for short-segment Barrett's esophagus

BACKGROUND: The rise in the incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma has led to the development of new methods to screen for the precursor lesion, Barrett's esophagus. AIM: To evaluate the potential role of esophageal capsule endoscopy in identifying the presence of short-segment Barrett's esophagus. METHODS: Patients with biopsy-proven short-segment Barrett's esophagus underwent esophageal capsule endoscopy. The images were reviewed by two expert observers with no knowledge of the purpose of the study. The data collected included transit time, quality of image, presence or absence of Z-line, Schatzki's ring, hiatal hernia, and Barrett's esophagus (long or short, definite or suspected). RESULTS: Twenty patients were studied; in 18, the capsule passed into the stomach. Barrett's esophagus was identified or suspected in eight cases (44%) by one observer and three (16%) by the second (P= 0.14). Although the Z-line was seen in the 18 cases that were qualified by both observers, there was an agreement in only six cases as to whether it was regular or irregular. Erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) was scored as present in three and absent in six patients by both readers. Nonexisting feline esophagus, varices, and distal esophageal stricture were suspected in one patient each. CONCLUSIONS: Esophageal capsule endoscopy had a high interobserver variability and a low yield for short-segment Barrett's esophagus. Esophageal capsule endoscopy cannot be recommended for screening for short-segment Barrett's esophagus.     

Clinical, endoscopic, and functional studies in 408 patients with Barrett's esophagus, compared to 174 cases of intestinal metaplasia of the cardia

OBJECTIVE: The pathophysiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has been studied extensively in patients with long-segment Barrett's esophagus (LSBE), but few reports have explored GERD pathophysiology in patients who have short-segment Barrett's esophagus (SSBE) or intestinal metaplasia at the cardia (IMC). We aimed to compare clinical, endoscopic, histological, and functional features in patients with LSBE, SSBE, and IMC. METHODS: We identified 582 patients who had intestinal metaplasia at the squamocolumnar junction in the distal esophagus and divided them into three groups based on the extent of columnar-lined esophagus observed endoscopically: 1) patients with IMC who had no columnar-lined esophagus (i.e., the squamocolumnar and gastroesophageal junctions coincided), 2) patients with LSBE who had >3 cm of columnar-lined esophagus, and 3) patients with SSBE who had <3 cm of columnar-lined esophagus. All patients had esophageal manometric evaluation, and 24-h esophageal pH monitoring was performed to determine the extent of acid and bile (bilirubin) reflux. RESULTS: There were 174 patients with IMC, 155 with LSBE, and 25 with SSBE. Compared to patients with LSBE and SSBE, patients with IMC had significantly lower frequencies of GERD symptoms, hiatal hernia, and erosive esophagitis; significantly higher lower esophageal sphincter pressures; and significantly shorter durations of acid and bile reflux. Between patients with SSBE and LSBE, significant differences were found in the frequency of hiatal hernia and duration of acid reflux (both greater in the patients with LSBE). Also, dysplasia was significantly more frequent in patients with LSBE than in those with SSBE or IMC. CONCLUSION: GERD symptoms, signs, and physiological abnormalities are found more often in patients with Barrett's esophagus than in those with IMC, and the duration of acid reflux in patients with LSBE is greater than that in patients with SSBE. These findings suggest that the extent of intestinal metaplasia in the esophagus is related directly to the severity of underlying GERD.     

Double cardia

Summary We report a patient with acquired double cardia (esophagogastric fistula). She was a 76-year-old farmer's widow with severe kyphosis. She presented with postprandial heartburn one month after the initiation of nifedipine and isosorbide dinitrate. Radiologic and endoscopic examinations revealed an esophagogastric fistula, short esophagus with hiatal hernia, Barrett's esophagus with reflux esophagitis, and ulcer. This case shows that repeated reflux esophagitis and esophageal ulcer, complicated with short esophagus and hiatal hernia, can predispose to the formation of esophagogastric fistula.     

Barrett's esophagus: Pathogenesis,epidemiology, functional abnormalities,malignant degeneration,and surgical management

Barrett's esophagus (i.e. columnar epithelial metaplasia in the distal esophagus) is an acquired condition that in most patients results from chronic gastroesophageal reflux. It is a disorder of the white male in the Western world with a prevalence of about 1/400 population. Due to the decreased sensitivity of the columnar epithelium to symptoms, Barrett's esophagus remains undiagnosed in the majority of patients. Gastroesophageal reflux disease in patients with Barrett's esophagus has a more severe character and is more frequently associated with complications as compared with reflux patients without columnar mucosa. This appears to be due to a combination of a mechanically defective lower esophageal sphincter, inefficient esophageal clearance function, and gastric acid hypersecretion. Excessive reflux of alkaline duodenal contents may be responsible for the development of complications (i.e., stricture, ulcer, and dysplasia). Therapy of benign Barrett's esophagus is directed towards treatment of the underlying reflux disease. Barrett's esophagus is associated with a 30- to 125-fold increased risk for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. The reasons for the dramatic rise in the incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma, which occurred during the past years, are unknown. High grade dysplasia in a patient with columnar mucosa is an ominous sign for malignant degeneration. Whether an esophagectomy should be performed in patients with high grade dysplasia remains controversial. Complete resection of the tumor and its lymphatic drainage is the procedure of choice in all patients with a resectable carcinoma who are fit for surgery. In patients with tumors located in the distal esophagus, this can be achieved by a transhiatal en-bloc esophagectomy and proximal gastrectomy. Early adenocarcinoma can be cured by this approach. The value of multimodality therapy in patients with advanced tumors needs to be shown in randomized prospective trials.     

Hiatal hernia size,Barrett's length,and severity of acid reflux are all risk factors for esophageal adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE: The reasons for the development of dysplasia and adenocarcinoma in Barrett's mucosa are not well understood. The aims of this study were to characterize risk factors for the transition from Barrett's esophagus without dysplasia to Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia or esophageal adenocarcinoma. METHODS: A group of 131 patients with high-grade dysplasia or esophageal adenocarcinoma were selected as case subjects. A first population of 2170 patients without gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and a second population of 1189 patients with Barrett's esophagus served as two control groups. Logistic regression analyses were used to compare the risk factors associated with the occurrence of high-grade dysplasia or esophageal adenocarcinoma. RESULTS: Patients with high-grade dysplasia or esophageal adenocarcinoma shared many characteristics with other forms of severe GERD, such as older age, male gender, and white ethnicity. The length of Barrett's esophagus and the size of hiatus hernia increased the risk for both conditions. Subjects with high-grade dysplasia and adenocarcinoma had more severe acid reflux than patients with other forms of GERD. Smoking and alcohol consumption did not affect the risk for developing high-grade dysplasia or adenocarcinoma in patients with Barrett's esophagus. CONCLUSIONS: High-grade dysplasia and esophageal adenocarcinoma seem to stem from an extreme and unfavorable constellation of all risk factors that are generally held responsible for the development of GERD and Barrett's esophagus.     

Prevalence of Barrett's esophagus by endoscopy and histologic studies: a prospective evaluation of 306 control subjects and 376 patients with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux

The classic endoscopic diagnosis of a Barrett's esophagus (BE) is based on the finding of > or =3 cm, of distal esophagus covered by specialized columnar epithelium. However, currently, it is based on the finding of intestinal metaplasia (IM) at the squamous-columnar mucosal junction, independent of its extent. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of Barrett's esophagus by endoscopic and histological findings in control subjects and in patients with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux (GER). Three hundred and six control subjects and 376 patients with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux were included in this prospective study. Patients with Barrett's esophagus were classified in three groups as follows. 1. Intestinal metaplasia at the cardia. When endoscopy showed non-Barrett's esophagus, but histological intestinal metaplasia was found. 2. Short-segment Barrett's esophagus. When <3 cm, was covered with tongues or finger-like or creeping substitution of distal esophagus. 3. Long-segment Barrett's esophagus. When > 3 cm, of distal esophagus was covered by specialized columnar epithelium. Two biopsies at the antrum, four biopsies at the squamous-columnar junction and one or two at the distal esophagus were taken. In control subjects, 1.6% showed histological IM at the esophagogastric junction. In patients with GER without esophagitis or with erosive esophagitis, IM was found in 18% and 10.7% respectively. 'Short-segment' Barrett's esophagus was three times more frequent than 'long-segment' Barrett's esophagus. Patients with Barrett's esophagus were significantly older than the other groups. The presence of complications or erosions, peptic ulcer or stricture were significantly more frequent among patients with 'long-segment' Barrett's esophagus (p < 0.0001). The prevalence of dysplasia was similar in all groups of patients with Barrett's esophagus. Complications such as ulcers, stricture and dysplasia were exclusively seen among patients with BE, whereas non-Barrett's patients did not exhibit these complications. In control subjects, IM can be found in a low percentage of cases. Among patients with symptoms of GER, the classic endoscopic diagnosis of a Barrett's esophagus can underestimate this condition in 80% of the cases. Patients with intestinal metaplasia at the cardia already present 17% of the cases with low-grade dysplasia. In all patients with symptoms of GER, systematic biopsies at the squamous-columnar junction should be taken.     

Radiologic diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus: critical analysis of 65 cases

A recent increase in the number of Barrett's esophagus being diagnosed is probably directly related to a proportional increase in endoscopic biopsies of the esophagus and awareness of premalignant potential of Barrett's mucosa. While the endoscopist can detect Barrett's mucosa with fair degree of accuracy, the radiologic diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus still remains a diagnostic challenge despite several well established radiologic features. We reviewed 65 patients with pathologically proven Barrett's esophagus and found a wide spectrum of radiologic features. These include hiatus hernia in 49, gastroesophageal reflux in 38, strictures in 32, esophagitis in 20, and characteristic Barrett's ulcer in 12. In addition ascending or migrating strictures were found in 10, mucosal pattern simulating areae gastricae in 5, cricopharyngeal dysfunction in 4, and fixed spiral folds in 3 patients. This constellation of radiologic features, some of which have not been previously emphasized, should further assist radiologists in suggesting the diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus.