Patients with High Priority for Kidney Transplant Who Are Not Given Expedited Placement on the Transplant Waiting List Represent Lost Opportunities

Open in a separate window     

Outcome of Kidney Transplantation Using Expanded Criteria Donors and Donation After Cardiac Death Kidneys: Realities and Costs

Expanded criteria donors (ECDs) and donation after cardiac death (DCD) provide more kidneys in the donor pool. However, the financial impact and the long-term benefits of these kidneys have been questioned. From 1998 to 2005, we performed 271 deceased donor kidney transplants into adult recipients. There were 163 (60.1%) SCDs, 44 (16.2%) ECDs, 53 (19.6%) DCDs and 11 (4.1%) ECD/DCDs. The mean follow-up was 50 months. ECD and DCD kidneys had a significantly higher incidence of delayed graft function, longer time to reach serum creatinine below 3 (mg/dL), longer length of stay and more readmissions compared to SCDs. The hospital charge was also higher for ECD, ECD/DCD and DCD kidneys compared to SCDs, primarily due to the longer length of stay and increased requirement for dialysis (70,030 dollars, 72,438 dollars, 72,789 dollars and 47,462 dollars, respectively, p < 0.001). Early graft survival rates were comparable among all groups. However, after a mean follow-up of 50 months, graft survival was significantly less in the ECD group compared to other groups. Although our observations support the utilization of ECD and DCD kidneys, these transplants are associated with increased costs and resource utilization. Revised reimbursement guidelines will be required for centers that utilize these organs.     

Death after Kidney Transplantation: An Analysis by Era and Time Post-Transplant

Open in a separate window     

Cancer Mortality in Kidney Transplantation

Immunosuppression is associated with an increased risk of cancer in kidney transplant recipients compared to the general population. It is less clear whether standardized cancer mortality ratios (SMRs) are also increased. This study's hypothesis is that SMRs are not increased because of competing risks of death. During the median follow-up of 5.05 years (Q1–Q3: 2.36–8.62), there were 1937 cancer deaths and 36 619 noncancer deaths among 164 078 first kidney-only transplant recipients captured in the United States Renal Data System between January 1990 and December 2004. The observed cancer death rate was 206 per 100 000 patient-years compared to an expected rate of 215 per 100 000 patient-years in the general population. The overall age- and sex-adjusted SMR was only 0.96 (95% CI 0.92–1.00). However, patients <50 years had SMRs significantly greater than unity while patients >60 had SMRs lower than unity. Up to 25% of cancer-related deaths occurred after allograft failure. These findings challenge the notion that cancer is a major cause of premature death in all kidney transplant recipients and has implications for design of cancer prevention strategies in kidney transplant recipients .     

Assessment of the Utility of Kidney Histology as a Basis for Discarding Organs in the United States: A Comparison of International Transplant Practices and Outcomes

Open in a separate window     

Outcomes After Transplantation of Deceased-Donor Kidneys with Rising Serum Creatinine

The increasing number of candidates for kidney transplantation and relatively unchanged deceased-donor pool has led to expansion in the criteria for donor acceptability. Outcomes of kidneys from donors with progressively rising creatinine values have not been reported. Patients transplanted between September 2003 and August 2006 with kidneys from donors with peak creatinine levels >2.0 mg/dL were stratified into two groups based on the terminal creatinine and evaluated for outcome: (1) falling creatinine (FC)(n= 27), terminal creatinine at least 0.2mg/dL less than peak, and (2) rising creatinine (RC)(n=24), terminal creatinine = peak. The mean terminal creatinine was significantly higher in the RC group (3.2 +/- 1.3 mg/dL) compared to the FC group (1.9 +/- 0.9 mg/dL)(p<0.0001). Peak creatinine values were similar (RC, 3.2 +/- 1.3; FC, 3.1 +/- 1.3; p=0.6521) between the two groups. Rates of delayed graft function (RC, 24%; FC 32%; p=0.7881) and mean creatinine at follow-up (RC, 1.6 +/- 0.6, FC 1.6 +/- 0.4; p=0.3533) were not significantly different. With a mean follow-up of 287 +/- 274 days, allograft survival was 92% in the RC recipients and 89% in the FC recipients. Under certain conditions, kidneys from donors with rising serum creatinine can be used safely with reasonable early outcomes.     

Cold Machine Perfusion Versus Static Cold Storage of Kidneys Donated After Cardiac Death: A UK Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

One third of deceased donor kidneys for transplantation in the UK are donated following cardiac death (DCD). Such kidneys have a high rate of delayed graft function (DGF) following transplantation. We conducted a multicenter, randomized controlled trial to determine whether kidney preservation using cold, pulsatile machine perfusion (MP) was superior to simple cold storage (CS) for DCD kidneys. One kidney from each DCD donor was randomly allocated to CS, the other to MP. A sequential trial design was used with the primary endpoint being DGF, defined as the necessity for dialysis within the first 7 days following transplant. The trial was stopped when data were available for 45 pairs of kidneys. There was no difference in the incidence of DGF between kidneys assigned to MP or CS (58% vs. 56%, respectively), in the context of an asystolic period of 15 min and median cold ischemic times of 13.9 h for MP and 14.3 h for CS kidneys. Renal function at 3 and 12 months was similar between groups, as was graft and patient survival. For kidneys from controlled DCD donors (with mean cold ischemic times around 14 h), MP offers no advantage over CS, which is cheaper and more straightforward.     

Should We Discard the Graft? Analysis of the Renal Grafts with a Total Ischemia Time of More Than 24 Hours Donated After Cardiac Death

The objective is to investigate the outcome of transplantation using kidney grafts from donors after cardiac death (DCDs) with a total ischemia time (TIT) longer than 24 h. All 373 kidneys were procured from DCDs. They were procured using the in-situ regional cooling technique. Grafts were classified into two groups according to TIT. Fifty-three grafts had a TIT longer than 24 h (group 1), and the other 320 grafts (group 2) were less than 24 h. The numbers of never functioning grafts (PGF) were 3 in group 1 (5.7%) and 17 in group 2 (5.3%), a nonsignificant difference. Graft survival rates at 3, 5 and 10 years posttransplant were 84.9%, 73.0% and 64.1% in group 1, and 76.3%, 69.9% and 57.1% in group 2, which demonstrate no significant difference. The significant risk factors for graft failure were donor age, serum creatinine level on hospitalization and WIT. However, TIT longer than 24 h was not employed. Multivariate logistic regression indicated that only WIT was associated with an increase in the risk of PGF. Our results demonstrate that kidneys from DCDs, even if their TIT is more than 24 h, should be considered a worthwhile source of renal grafts.     

Kidney Transplant Outcomes for Prior Living Organ Donors

The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network gives priority in kidney allocation to prior live organ donors who require a kidney transplant. In this study, we analyzed the effect of this policy on facilitating access to transplantation for prior donors who were wait-listed for kidney transplantation in the United States. Using 1:1 propensity score–matching methods, we assembled two matched cohorts. The first cohort consisted of prior organ donors and matched nondonors who were wait-listed during the years 1996–2010. The second cohort consisted of prior organ donors and matched nondonors who underwent deceased donor kidney transplantation. During the study period, there were 385,498 listings for kidney transplantation, 252 of which were prior donors. Most prior donors required dialysis by the time of listing (64% versus 69% among matched candidates; P=0.24). Compared with matched nondonors, prior donors had a higher rate of deceased donor transplant (85% versus 33%; P<0.001) and a lower median time to transplantation (145 versus 1607 days; P<0.001). Prior donors received higher-quality allografts (median kidney donor risk index 0.67 versus 0.90 for nondonors; P<0.001) and experienced lower post-transplant mortality (hazard ratio, 0.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.08 to 0.46; P<0.001) than matched nondonors. In conclusion, these data suggest that prior organ donors experience brief waiting time for kidney transplant and receive excellent-quality kidneys, but most need pretransplant dialysis. Individuals who are considering live organ donation should be provided with this information because this allocation priority will remain in place under the new US kidney allocation system.     

The Effect of Anastomosis Time on Outcome in Recipients of Kidneys Donated After Brain Death: A Cohort Study

Whether warm ischemia during the time to complete the vascular anastomoses determines renal allograft function has not been investigated systematically. We investigated the effect of anastomosis time on allograft outcome in 669 first, single kidney transplantations from brain‐dead donors. Anastomosis time independently increased the risk of delayed graft function (odds ratio per minute [OR] 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02–1.07, p < 0.001) and independently impaired allograft function after transplantation (p = 0.009, mixed‐models repeated‐measures analysis). In a subgroup of transplant recipients, protocol‐specified biopsies at 3 months (n = 186), 1 year (n = 189), and 2 years (n = 153) were blindly reviewed. Prolonged anastomosis time independently increased the risk of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy on these protocol‐specified biopsies posttransplant (p < 0.001, generalized linear models). In conclusion, prolonged anastomosis time is not only detrimental for renal allograft outcome immediately after transplantation, also longer‐term allograft function and histology are affected by the duration of this warm ischemia.     

Embolization of Polycystic Kidneys as an Alternative to Nephrectomy Before Renal Transplantation: A Pilot Study

In autosomal polycystic kidney disease, nephrectomy is required before transplantation if kidney volume is excessive. We evaluated the effectiveness of transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) to obtain sufficient volume reduction for graft implantation. From March 2007 to December 2009, 25 patients with kidneys descending below the iliac crest had unilateral renal TAE associated with a postembolization syndrome protocol. Volume reduction was evaluated by CT before, 3, and 6 months after embolization. The strategy was considered a success if the temporary contraindication for renal transplantation could be withdrawn within 6 months after TAE. TAE was well tolerated and the objective was reached in 21 patients. The temporary contraindication for transplantation was withdrawn within 3 months after TAE in 9 patients and within 6 months in 12 additional patients. The mean reduction in volume was 42% at 3 months (p = 0.01) and 54% at 6 months (p = 0.001). One patient required a cyst sclerosis to reach the objective. The absence of sufficient volume reduction was due to an excessive basal renal volume, a missed accessory artery and/or renal artery revascularization. Embolization of enlarged polycystic kidneys appears to be an advantageous alternative to nephrectomy before renal transplantation.     

Outcomes of Kidneys from Donors After Cardiac Death: Implications for Allocation and Preservation

Although donation after cardiac death (DCD) kidneys have a high incidence of delayed graft function (DGF) and have been considered marginal, no tool for stratifying risk of graft loss nor a specific policy governing their allocation exist. We compared outcomes of 2562 DCD, 62,800 standard criteria donor (SCD) and 12,812 expanded criteria donor (ECD) transplants reported between 1993 and 2005, and evaluated factors associated with risk of graft loss and DGF in DCD kidneys. Donor age was the only criterion used in the definition of ECD kidneys that independently predicted graft loss among DCD kidneys. Kidneys from DCD donors <50 had similar long-term graft survival to those from SCD (RR 1.1, p = NS). While DGF was higher among DCD compared to SCD and ECD, limiting cold ischemia (CIT) to <12 h decreased the rate of DGF 15% among DCD <50 kidneys. These findings suggest that DCD <50 kidneys function like SCD kidneys and should not be viewed as marginal or ECD, and further, limiting CIT <12 h markedly reduces DGF.