A Comparison of Remifentanil and Morphine Sulfate for Acute Postoperative Analgesia after Total Intravenous Anesthesia with Remifentanil and Propofol

Background: The transition from remifentanil intraoperative anesthesia to postoperative analgesia must be planned carefully due to the short duration of action (3-10 min) of remifentanil hydrochloride, a potent, esterase-metabolized micro-opioid agonist. This study compared the efficacy and safety of transition regimens using remifentanil or morphine sulfate for immediate postoperative pain relief in patients who had surgery under general anesthesia with remifentanil/propofol.

Methods: One hundred fifty patients who had received open-label remifentanil and propofol for intraoperative anesthesia participated in this multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy study and were randomly assigned to either the remifentanil (R) group or the morphine sulfate (M) group. Twenty minutes before the anticipated end of surgery, the propofol infusion was decreased by 50%, and patients received either a placebo bolus (R group) or a bolus of 0.15 mg/kg morphine (M group). At the end of surgery, the propofol and remifentanil maintenance infusions were discontinued and the analgesic infusion was started: either 0.1 micro gram [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] min sup -1 remifentanil (R group) or placebo analgesic infusion (M group). During the 25 min after tracheal extubation, remifentanil titrations in increments of 0.025 micro gram [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] min sup -1 and placebo boluses (R group), or 2 mg intravenous morphine boluses and placebo rate increases (M group) were administered as necessary at 5-min intervals to control pain. Patients received the 0.075 mg/kg intravenous morphine bolus (R group) or placebo (M group) at 25 and 30 min after extubation, and the analgesic infusion was discontinued at 35 min. From 35 to 65 minutes after extubation, both groups received 2-6 mg open-label morphine analgesia every 5 min as needed.

Results: Successful analgesia, defined as no or mild pain with adequate respiration (respiratory rate [RR] >or= to 8 breaths/min and pulse oximetry >or= to 90%), was achieved in more patients in the R group than in the M group (58% vs. 33%, respectively) at 25 min after extubation (P < 0.05). The median remifentanil rate for successful analgesia was 0.125 micro gram [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] min sup -1 (range, 0.05-0.23 micro gram [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] min sup -1), and the median number of 2-mg morphine boluses used was 2 (range, 0-5 boluses). At 35 min after extubation, >or= to 74% of patients in both groups experienced moderate to severe pain. Median recovery times from the end of surgery were similar between groups. Transient respiratory depression, apnea, or both were the most frequent adverse events (14% for the R group vs. 6% for the M group; P > 0.05).     

Epidural Clonidine or Bupivacaine as the Sole Analgesic Agent during and after Abdominal Surgery: A Comparative Study

Background: The rationale of this study was to compare high-dose epidural clonidine with a more commonly used agent, such as bupivacaine. This was performed to give a more objective idea of the relative analgesic potency of epidural clonidine.

Methods: Sixty patients undergoing intestinal surgery during propofol anesthesia were studied. At induction, the patients received epidurally a dose of 10 mg/kg clonidine in 7 ml saline followed by an infusion of 6 mg [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] h-1 (7 ml/h) (group 1, n = 20), a dose of 7 ml bupivacaine, 0.5%, followed by 7 ml/h bupivacaine, 0.25% (group 2, n = 20), or a dose of 7 ml bupivacaine, 0.25%, followed by 7 ml/h bupivacaine, 0.125% (group 3, n = 20). Intraoperatively, increases in arterial blood pressure or heart rate not responding to propofol (0.5 mg/kg) were treated with intravenous alfentanil (0.05 mg/kg). Additional doses of propofol were given to maintain an adequate bispectral index. The epidural infusions were maintained for 12 h. In cases of subjective visual analogue pain scores up to 5 cm at rest or up to 8 cm during coughing, the patients were given access to a patient-controlled analgesia device.

Results: During anesthesia, patients in group 1 required less propofol than those in groups 2 and 3 (78 [36-142] mg vs. 229 [184-252] mg and 362 [295-458] mg; P < 0.05) and less alfentanil than patients in group 3 (0 [0-0] mg vs. 11 [6-20] mg; P < 0.05). Analgesia lasted 380 min (range, 180-645 min) in group 1 versus 30 min (range, 25-40 min) in group 2 and 22 min (range, 12.5-42 min) in group 3 (P < 0.05). There was no suggestion of a hemodynamic difference among the three groups except for heart rates that were significantly reduced in patients in group 1. Sedation scores were significantly higher in this group during the first 2 h postoperatively.     

Remifentanil versus Remifentanil/midazolam for Ambulatory Surgery during Monitored Anesthesia Care

Background: This study was designed to define the appropriate dose of remifentanil hydrochloride alone or combined with midazolam to provide satisfactory comfort and maintain adequate respiration for a monitored anesthesia care setting.

Methods: One hundred fifty-nine patients scheduled for outpatient surgery participated in this multicenter, double-blind study. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups: remifentanil, 1 micro gram/kg, given over 30 s followed by a continuous infusion of 0.1 micro gram [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] min sup -1 (remifentanil); remifentanil, 0.5 micro gram/kg, given over 30 s followed by a continuous infusion of 0.05 micro gram [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] min sup -1 (remifentanil + midazolam). Five minutes after the start of the infusion, patients received a loading dose of saline placebo (remifentanil) or midazolam, 1 mg, (remifentanil + midazolam). If patients were not oversedated, a second dose of placebo or midazolam, 1 mg, was given. Remifentanil was titrated (in increments of 50% from the initial rate) to limit patient discomfort or pain intraoperatively, and the infusion was terminated at the completion of skin closure.

Results: At the time of the local anesthetic, most patients in the remifentanil and remifentanil + midazolam groups experienced no pain (66% and 60%, respectively) and no discomfort (66% and 65%, respectively). The final mean (+/- SD) remifentanil infusion rates were 0.12 +/- 0.05 micro gram [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] min sup -1 (remifentanil) and 0.07 +/- 0.03 micro gram [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] min sup -1 (remifentanil + midazolam). Fewer patients in the remifentanil + midazolam group experienced nausea compared with the remifentanil group (16% vs. 36%, respectively; P < 0.05). Four patients (5%) in the remifentanil group and two patients (2%) in the remifentanil + midazolam group experienced brief periods of oxygen desaturation (SpO2 < 90%) and hypoventilation (< 8 breaths/min).     

Interaction of Intrathecally Infused Morphine and Lidocaine in Rats (Part II): Effects on the Development of Tolerance to Morphine

Background: There has been little information regarding the effects of local anesthetics on tolerance to opioids, although chronic use of combination of opioids and local anesthetics is popular for pain control. This study was designed to examine the effects of lidocaine on morphine tolerance to somatic and visceral antinociception.

Methods: Rats received a continuous intrathecal infusion of morphine (0.3-10 [micro sign]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] h-1), lidocaine (30-1000 [micro sign]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] h-1), a combination of those, or saline. After 6- day infusion, intrathecal morphine challenge test (5 [micro sign]g/10 [micro sign]l) was performed, and time-response curve was constructed to assess the magnitude of tolerance. The tail flick (TF) test and colorectal distension (CD) test were used to measure somatic and visceral antinociceptive effects, respectively.

Results: Antinociceptive effects in the TF and CD tests caused by morphine challenge were reduced (P < 0.01) in the morphine infused groups. The magnitude of the tolerance was inversely associated with the amount of morphine infused. Lidocaine infusion induced no different change in the morphine challenge test from that seen in the saline infusion group. Development of tolerance was greater in morphine 3 [micro sign]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] h-1 than in morphine 0.75 [micro sign]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] h-1 + lidocaine 150 [micro sign]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] h-1 despite their similar antinociceptive effects during intrathecal infusion. The infusion of a low dose of morphine (0.3 [micro sign]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] h-1) did not reduce the antinociceptive effects in the challenge test.     

Pharmacokinetics Anesthesiologists, and Pharmacodynamics of Remifentanil in Persons with Renal Failure Compared with Healthy Volunteers

Background: Remifentanil is an opioid analgesic for use in anesthesia. An ester linkage renders it susceptible to rapid metabolism by blood and tissue esterases. Thus it was hypothesized that remifentanil elimination would be independent of renal function. Because its principal metabolite (GR90291) is eliminated renally, it would depend on renal function. This study was designed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil and its metabolite in persons with and without renal failure.

Methods: Two groups of volunteers received two-stage infusions of remifentanil: low dose with 0.0125 micro gram [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] min sup -1 for 1 h followed by 0.025 micro gram kg sup -1 [center dot] min sup -1 for 3 h; and high dose with 0.025 micro gram [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] min sup -1 for 1 h followed by 0.05 micro gram [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] min sup -1 for 3 h. Blood samples were collected for analysis of remifentanil and GR90291 concentrations. The pharmacokinetics of remifentanil were fit using a one-compartment pharmacokinetic model. Remifentanil's effect was determined intermittently using minute ventilation during a hypercapnic (7.5% CO2) challenge.

Results: Fifteen patients with renal failure and eight control participants were enrolled. The clearance and volume of distribution of remifentanil were not different between those with renal failure and the controls. Patients with renal failure showed a marked reduction in the elimination of GR90291; the half-life of the metabolite increased from 1.5 h in the controls to more than 26 h in patients with renal failure. The steady-state concentration of GR90291 is likely to be more than 25 times higher in persons with renal failure. There were no obvious differences in opioid effects on minute ventilation in the controls and in patients with renal failure.     

Comparison of Remifentanil and Fentanyl in Patients Undergoing Craniotomy for Supratentorial Space-occupying Lesions

Background: Remifentanil hydrochloride is an ultra-short-acting, esterase-metabolized micro-opioid receptor agonist. This study compared the use of remifentanil or fentanyl during elective supratentorial craniotomy for space-occupying lesions.

Methods: Sixty-three adults gave written informed consent for this prospective, randomized, double-blind, multiple-center trial. Anesthesia was induced with thiopental, pancuronium, nitrous oxide/oxygen, and fentanyl (n = 32; 2 micro gram [center dot] kg [center dot] sup -1 min sup -1) or remifentanil (n = 31; 1 micro [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] min sup -1). After tracheal intubation, infusion rates were reduced to 0.03 micro gram [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] min sup -1 (fentanyl) or 0.2 micro gram [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] min sup -1 (remifentanil) and then adjusted to maintain anesthesia and stable hemodynamics. Isoflurane was given only after specified infusion rate increases had occurred. At the time of the first burr hole, intracranial pressure was measured in a subset of patients. At bone flap replacement either saline (fentanyl group) or remifentanil ([nearly equal] 0.2 micro gram [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] min sup -1) were infused until dressing completion. Hemodynamics and time to recovery were monitored for 60 min. Analgesic requirements and nausea and vomiting were observed for 24 h. Neurological examinations were performed before operation and on postoperative days 1 and 7.

Results: Induction hemodynamics were similar. Systolic blood pressure was greater in the patients receiving fentanyl after tracheal intubation (fentanyl = 127 +/- 18 mmHg; remifentanil = 113 +/- 18 mmHg; P = 0.004). Intracranial pressure (fentanyl = 14 +/- 13 mmHg; remifentanil = 13 +/- 10 mmHg) and cerebral perfusion pressure (fentanyl = 76 +/- 19 mmHg; remifentanil = 78 +/- 14 mmHg) were similar. Isoflurane use was greater in the patients who received fentanyl. Median time to tracheal extubation was similar (fentanyl = 4 min: range = -1 to 40 min; remifentanil = 5 min: range = 1 to 15 min). Seven patients receiving fentanyl and none receiving remifentanil required naloxone. Postoperative systolic blood pressure was greater (fentanyl = 134 +/- 16 mmHg; remifentanil = 147 +/- 15 mmHg; P = 0.001) and analgesics were required earlier in patients receiving remifentanil. Incidences of nausea and vomiting were similar.     

Interaction of Intrathecally Infused Morphine and Lidocaine in Rats (Part I): Synergistic Antinociceptive Effects

Background: Synergistic antinociception of opioids and local anesthetics has been established in bolus injections but not in long-term use. The somatic and visceral antinociceptive effects of intrathecally infused morphine or lidocaine were characterized, and the nature of the interaction of those agents in rats was evaluated.

Methods: Intrathecal catheters were implanted in rats. Morphine (0.3 to 10 [micro sign]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] h-1), lidocaine (30-1,000 [micro sign]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] h-1), a combination of those, or saline was infused intrathecally at a constant rate of 1 [micro sign]l/h for 6 days. The tail flick and colorectal distension tests were used to measure the somatic and visceral antinociceptive effects, respectively. Nociceptive tests and motor function tests were repeated on days 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6. Isobolographic analysis was performed on the results of the tail flick test to determine the magnitude of the interaction.

Results: Intrathecally infused morphine produced dose-dependent antinociceptive effects in both the tail flick and the colorectal distension tests. Morphine showed a lower peak percentage maximum possible effect (%MPE) in the colorectal distension test than in the tail flick test. Intrathecal lidocaine also produced dose-dependent antinociceptive effects. Lidocaine infusion at 1,000 [micro sign]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] h-1 caused motor impairment. Coinfusion of morphine 0.3 [micro sign]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] h-1 and lidocaine 200 [micro sign]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] h-1, which had no effects by themselves, significantly increased the percentage maximum possible effects (P < 0.01). Coinfused lidocaine potentiated the duration and the magnitude of morphine antinociception. Isobolographic analysis of the tail flick test on day 1 showed a synergistic interaction between morphine and lidocaine.     

Effects of Perioperative Analgesic Technique on the Surgical Outcome and Duration of Rehabilitation after Major Knee Surgery

Background: Continuous passive motion after major knee surgery optimizes the functional prognosis but causes severe pain. The authors tested the hypothesis that postoperative analgesic techniques influence surgical outcome and the duration of convalescence.

Methods: Before standardized general anesthesia, 56 adult scheduled for major knee surgery were randomly assigned to one of three groups, each to receive a different postoperative analgesic technique for 72 h: continuous epidural infusion, continuous femoral block, or intravenous patient-controlled morphine (dose, 1 mg; lockout interval, 7 min; maximum dose, 30 mg/4 h). The first two techniques were performed using a solution of 1% lidocaine, 0.03 mg/ml morphine, and 2 [micro sign]g/ml clonidine administered at 0.1 ml [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] h-1. Pain was assessed at rest and during continuous passive motion using a visual analog scale. The early postoperative maximal amplitude of knee flexion was measured during continuous passive motion at 24 h and 48 h and compared with the target levels prescribed by the surgeon. To evaluate functional outcome, the maximal amplitudes were measured again on postoperative day 5, at hospital discharge (day 7), and at 1- and 3-month follow-up examinations. When the patients left the surgical ward, they were admitted to a rehabilitation center, where their length of stay depended on prospectively determined discharge criteria.

Results: The continuous epidural infusion and continuous femoral block groups showed significantly lower visual analog scale scores at rest and during continuous passive motion compared with the patient-controlled morphine group. The early postoperative knee mobilization levels in both continuous epidural infusion and continuous femoral block groups were significantly closer to the target levels prescribed by the surgeon than in the patient-controlled morphine group. On postoperative day 7, these values were 90 [degree sign] (60-100 [degree sign]) (median and 25th-27th percentiles) in the continuous epidural infusion group, 90 [degree sign] (60-100 [degree sign]) in the continuous femoral block group, and 80 [degree sign] (60-100 [degree sign]) in the patient-controlled morphine group (P < 0.05). The durations of stay in the rehabilitation center were significantly shorter: 37 days (range, 30-45 days) in the continuous epidural infusion group, 40 days (range, 31-60 days) in the continuous femoral block group, and 50 days (range, 30-80 days) in the patient-controlled morphine group (P < 0.05). Side effects were encountered more frequently in the continuous epidural infusion group.     

Selective Pulmonary Vasodilation by Intravenous Infusion of an Ultrashort Half-life Nucleophile/Nitric Oxide Adduct

Background: PROLI/NO (C5 H7 N3 O4 Na2 [center dot] CH3 OH) is an ultrashort-acting nucleophile/NO adduct that generates NO (half-life 2 s at 37 [degree sign] Celsius and pH 7.4). Because of its short half-life, the authors hypothesized that intravenous administration of this compound would selectively dilate the pulmonary vasculature but cause little or no systemic hypotension.

Methods: In eight awake healthy sheep with pulmonary hypertension induced by 9,11-dideoxy-9 alpha,11 alpha-methanoepoxy prostaglandin F sub 2 alpha, the authors compared PROLI/NO with two reference drugs-inhaled NO, a well-studied selective pulmonary vasodilator, and intravenous sodium nitroprusside (SNP), a nonselective vasodilator. Sheep inhaled 10, 20, 40, and 80 parts per million NO or received intravenous infusions of 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 micro gram [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] min sup -1 of SNP or 0.75, 1.5, 3, 6, and 12 micro gram [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] min sup -1 of PROLI/NO. The order of administration of the vasoactive drugs (NO, SNP, PROLI/NO) and their doses were randomized.

Results: Inhaled NO selectively dilated the pulmonary vasculature. Intravenous SNP induced nonselective vasodilation of the systemic and pulmonary circulation. Intravenous PROLI/NO selectively vasodilated the pulmonary circulation at doses up to 6 micro gram [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] min sup -1, which decreased pulmonary vascular resistance by 63% (P < 0.01) from pulmonary hypertensive baseline values without changing systemic vascular resistance. At 12 micro gram [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] min sup -1, PROLI/NO decreased systemic and pulmonary vascular resistance and pressure. Exhaled NO concentrations were higher during PROLI/NO infusion than during SNP infusion (P < 0.01 with all data pooled).     

Differential Modulation of Remifentanil-induced Analgesia and Postinfusion Hyperalgesia by S-Ketamine and Clonidine in Humans

Background: Experimental studies and clinical observations suggest a possible role for opioids to induce pain and hyperalgesia on withdrawal. The authors used a new experimental pain model in human skin to determine the time course of analgesic and hyperalgesic effects of the [mu]-receptor agonist remifentanil alone or in combination with the N-methyl-D-aspartate-receptor antagonist S-ketamine or the [alpha]2-receptor agonist clonidine.

Methods: Thirteen volunteers were enrolled in this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Transcutaneous electrical stimulation at a high current density (2 Hz, 67.3 +/- 16.8 mA, mean +/- SD) induced acute pain (numerical 11-point rating scale: 5-6 out of 10) and stable areas of mechanical hyperalgesia to punctate stimuli and touch (allodynia). The magnitude of pain and area of hyperalgesia were assessed before, during, and after drug infusion (remifentanil at 0.1 [mu]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1 and S-ketamine at 5 [mu]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1 over a period of 30 min, respectively; clonidine infusion at 2 [mu]g/kg for 5 min).

Results: Remifentanil reduced pain and areas of punctate hyperalgesia during infusion. In contrast, postinfusion pain and hyperalgesia were significantly higher than control. During infusion of S-ketamine, pain and hyperalgesia decreased and gradually normalized after infusion. When given in combination, S-ketamine abolished postinfusion increase of punctate hyperalgesia but did not reduce increased pain ratings. Clonidine alone did not significantly attenuate pain or areas of hyperalgesia. However, when given in combination with remifentanil, clonidine attenuated postinfusion increase of pain ratings.     

Comparison of Adenosine and Remifentanil Infusions as Adjuvants to Desflurane Anesthesia

Background: Because adenosine has been alleged to produce both anesthetic and analgesic sparing effects, a randomized, double-blinded study was designed to compare the perioperative effects of adenosine and remifentanil when administered as intravenous adjuvants during general anesthesia for major gynecologic procedures.

Methods: Thirty-two women were assigned randomly to one of two drug treatment groups. After premedication with 0.04 mg/kg intravenous midazolam, anesthesia was induced with 2 [micro sign]g/kg intravenous fentanyl, 1.5 mg/kg intravenous propofol, and 0.6 mg/kg intravenous rocuronium, and maintained with desflurane, 2%, and nitrous oxide, 65%, in oxygen. Before skin incision, an infusion of either remifentanil (0.02 [micro sign]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1) or adenosine (25 [micro sign]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1) was started and subsequently titrated to maintain systolic blood pressure, heart rate, or both within 10-15% of the preincision values.

Results: Adenosine and remifentanil infusions were effective anesthetic adjuvants during lower abdominal surgery. Use of adenosine (mean +/- SEM, 166 +/- 17 [micro sign]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1) was associated with a significantly greater decrease in systolic blood pressure and higher heart rate values compared with remifentanil (mean +/- SEM, 0.2 +/- 0.03 [micro sign]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1). Total postoperative opioid analgesic use was 45% and 27% lower in the adenosine group at 0-2 h and 2-24 h after surgery, respectively.     

The Anabolic Effect of Epidural Blockade Requires Energy and Substrate Supply

Background: The authors examined the hypothesis that continuous thoracic epidural blockade with local anesthetic and opioid, in contrast to patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with morphine, stimulates postoperative whole body protein synthesis during combined provision of energy (4 mg [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1 glucose) and amino acids (0.02 ml [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1 Travasol(TM) 10%, equivalent to approximately 2.9 g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] day-1).

Methods: Sixteen patients were randomly assigned to undergo a 6-h stable isotope infusion study (3 h fasted, 3 h feeding) on the second day after colorectal surgery performed with or without perioperative epidural blockade. Protein synthesis, breakdown and oxidation, glucose production, and clearance were measured by l-[1-13C]leucine and [6,6-2H2]glucose.

Results: Epidural blockade did not affect protein and glucose metabolism in the fasted state. Parenteral alimentation decreased endogenous protein breakdown and glucose production to the same extent in both groups. Administration of glucose and amino acids was associated with an increase in whole body protein synthesis that was modified by the type of analgesia, i.e., protein synthesis increased by 13% in the epidural group (from 93.3 +/- 16.6 to 104.5 +/- 11.1 [mu]mol [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] h-1) and by 4% in the patient-controlled analgesia group (from 90.0 +/- 27.1 to 92.9 +/- 14.8 [mu]mol [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] h-1;P = 0.054).     

Pharmacokinetics of [Greek small letter epsilon]-aminocaproic Acid in Patients Undergoing Aortocoronary Bypass Surgery

Background: [Greek small letter epsilon]-Aminocaproic acid (EACA) is commonly infused during cardiac surgery using empiric dosing schemes. The authors developed a pharmacokinetic model for EACA elimination in surgical patients, tested whether adjustments for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) would improve the model, and then used the model to develop an EACA dosing schedule that would yield nearly constant EACA blood concentrations.

Methods: Consenting patients undergoing elective coronary artery surgery received one of two loading doses of EACA, 30 mg/kg (group I, n = 7) or 100 mg/kg (group II, n = 6) after CPB, or (group III) a 100 mg/kg loading dose before CPB and a 10 mg [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] h-1 maintenance infusion continued for 4 h during and after CPB (n = 7). Two patients with renal failure received EACA in the manner of group III. Blood concentrations of EACA, measured by high-performance liquid chromatography, were subjected to mixed-effects pharmacokinetic modeling.

Results: The EACA concentration data were best fit by a model with two compartments and corrections for CPB. The elimination rate constant k10 fell from 0.011 before CPB to 0.0006 during CPB, returning to 0.011 after CPB. V1 increased 3.8 l with CPB and remained at that value thereafter. Cl1 varied from 0.08 l/min before CPB to 0.007 l/min during CPB and 0.13 l/min after CPB. Cl2 increased from 0.09 l/min before CPB to 0.14 l/min during and after CPB. Two patients with renal failure demonstrated markedly reduced clearance. Using their model, the authors predict that an EACA loading infusion of 50 mg/kg given over 20 min and a maintenance infusion of 25 mg [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] h-1 would maintain a nearly constant target concentration of 260 [micro sign]g/ml.     

Sex-related Differences in the Influence of Morphine on Ventilatory Control in Humans

Background: Opiate agonists have different analgesic effects in male and female patients. The authors describe the influence of sex on the respiratory pharmacology of the micro-receptor agonist morphine.

Methods: The study was placebo-controlled, double-blind, and randomized. Steady-state ventilatory responses to carbon dioxide and responses to a step into hypoxia (duration, 3 min; oxygen saturation, [approximately] 82%; end-tidal carbon dioxide tension, 45 mmHg) were obtained before and during intravenous morphine or placebo administration (bolus dose of 100 micro gram/kg, followed by a continuous infusion of 30 micro gram [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] h sup -1) in 12 men and 12 women.

Results: In women, morphine reduced the slope of the ventilatory response to carbon dioxide from 1.8 +/- 0.9 to 1.3 +/- 0.7 l [center dot] min sup -1 [center dot] mmHg sup -1 (mean +/- SD; P < 0.05), whereas in men there was no significant effect (control = 2.0 +/- 0.4 vs. morphine = 1.8 +/- 0.4 l [center dot] min sup -1 [center dot] mmHg sup -1). Morphine had no effect on the apneic threshold in women (control = 33.8 +/- 3.8 vs. morphine = 35.3 +/- 5.3 mmHg), but caused an increase in men from 34.5 +/- 2.3 to 38.3 +/- 3 mmHg, P < 0.05). Morphine decreased hypoxic sensitivity in women from 1.0 +/- 0.5 l [center dot] min sup -1 [center dot] % sup -1 to 0.5 +/- 0.4 l [center dot] min sup -1 [center dot] % sup -1 (P < 0.05) but did not cause a decrease in men (control = 1.0 +/- 0.5 l [center dot] min sup -1 [center dot] % sup -1 vs. morphine = 0.9 +/- 0.5 l [center dot] min sup -1 [center dot] % sup -1). Weight, lean body mass, body surface area, and calculated fat mass differed between the sexes, but their inclusion in the analysis as a covariate revealed no influence on the differences between men and women in morphine-induced changes.     

The Effect of Clonidine on Cerebral Blood Flow Velocity, Carbon Dioxide Cerebral Vasoreactivity, and Response to Increased Arterial Pressure in Human Volunteers

Background: Because patients may be taking clonidine chronically or may be receiving it as a premedication before surgery, the authors investigated its effect on cerebral hemodynamics.

Methods: In nine volunteers, middle cerebral artery mean blood flow velocity (Vm) was measured using transcranial Doppler ultrasonography (TCD). CO2 vasoreactivity was measured before clonidine administration (preclonidine), 90 min after clonidine, 5 micro gram/kg yorally, then following restoration of mean arterial pressure (MAP) to the preclonidine level. In addition, Vm was measured after a phenylephrine-induced 30-mmHg increase in MAP.

Results: After clonidine administration, Vm decreased from 62 +/- 9 to 48 +/- 8 cm/s (P < 0.01), and MAP decreased from 86 +/- 10 to 63 +/- 5 mmHg (P < 0.01; mean +/- SD). Clonidine decreased the CO2 vasoreactivity slope from 2.2 +/- 0.4 to 1.2 +/- 0.5 cm [center dot] s sup -1 [center dot] mmHg sup -1 (P < 0.05); restoring MAP to the preclonidine level increased the slope to 1.60 +/- 0.5 cm [center dot] s sup -1 [center dot] mmHg [center dot] sup -1, still less than the preclonidine slope (P < 0.05). CO2 vasoreactivity expressed as a percentage change in Vm, decreased after clonidine, 3.5 +/- 0.8 versus 2.4 +/- 0.8%/mmHg (P < 0.05); this difference disappeared after restoration of MAP, 3.1 +/- 1.2%/mmHg. With a 30-mmHg increase in MAP, Vm increased by 13% before and after clonidine (P < 0.05).     

Meperidine Decreases the Shivering Threshold Twice as Much as the Vasoconstriction Threshold

Background: Meperidine administration is a more effective treatment for shivering than equianalgesic doses of other opioids. However, it remains unknown whether meperidine also profoundly impairs other thermoregulatory responses, such as sweating or vasoconstriction. Proportional inhibition of vasoconstriction and shivering suggests that the drug acts much like alfentanil and anesthetics but possesses greater thermoregulatory than analgesic potency. In contrast, disproportionate inhibition would imply a special antishivering mechanism. Accordingly, the authors tested the hypothesis that meperidine administration produces a far greater concentration-dependent reduction in the shivering than vasoconstriction threshold.

Methods: Nine volunteers were each studied on three days: 1) control (no opioid); 2) a target total plasma meperidine concentration of 0.6 micro gram/ml (40 mg/h); and 3) a target concentration of 1.8 micro gram/ml (120 mg/h). Each day, skin and core temperatures were increased to provoke sweating and then subsequently reduced to elicit vasoconstriction and shivering. Core-temperature thresholds (at a designated skin temperature of 34 degrees Celsius) were computed using established linear cutaneous contributions to control sweating (10%) and vasoconstriction and shivering (20%). The dose-dependent effects of unbound meperidine on thermoregulatory response thresholds was then determined using linear regression. Results are presented as means +/- SDs.

Results: The unbound meperidine fraction was [nearly equal] 35%. Meperidine administration slightly increased the sweating threshold (0.5 +/- 0.8 degrees Celsius [center dot] micro gram sup -1 [center dot] ml; r2 = 0.51 +/- 0.37) and markedly decreased the vasoconstriction threshold (-3.3 +/- 1.5 degrees Celsius [center dot] micro gram sup -1 [center dot] ml; r sup 2 = 0.92 +/- 0.08). However, meperidine reduced the shivering threshold nearly twice as much as the vasoconstriction threshold (-6.1 +/- 3.0 degrees Celsius [center dot] micro gram sup -1 [center dot] ml; r2 = 0.97 +/- 0.05; P = 0.001).     

Side-effects of postoperative epidural analgesia in children: a randomized study comparing morphine and clonidine

BACKGROUND: Morphine is widely used in association with local anaesthetics for postoperative epidural analgesia. There are no data on the prolonged use of clonidine for postoperative analgesia in children. The primary outcome of this randomized, double-blind trial was to compare the incidence of side-effects after epidural infusion of clonidine or morphine, in association with ropivacaine in children. METHODS: After institutional approval, 26 children, aged 3-12 years, who were scheduled for abdominal surgery, had an epidural catheter placed after induction of general anaesthesia. Patients were then randomized to two different groups. After an initial bolus of 2.5 mg x kg-1 0.25% ropivacaine with either 40 micro g x kg-1 morphine (group M, n = 14) or 1 micro g x kg-1 clonidine (group C, n = 12), an epidural infusion was started at a rate of 0.4 ml x kg-1 x h-1. The patients in the M group received an infusion of 0.08% ropivacaine with 10 micro g.ml-1 morphine, those in the group C an infusion of 0.08% ropivacaine with 0.6 micro g.ml-1 clonidine. RESULTS: The two groups were similar with respect to age, sex and weight. One patient in the C group was excluded for misplacement of the epidural catheter. The incidence of vomiting and pruritus was significantly higher in the M group compared with the C group (64% and 85% versus 0%, respectively). The incidence of pain was significantly higher in the C group compared with the M group (73% versus 29%) as well as the need for rescue analgesia medications. CONCLUSIONS: Epidural clonidine is followed by a significantly lower incidence of side-effects. However, its analgesic effects, at least at the doses used in this study, are less potent than those of epidural morphine.     

Study of Three Different Doses of Epidural Neostigmine Coadministered with Lidocaine for Postoperative Analgesia

Background: Intrathecal neostigmine produces analgesia in volunteers and patients. However, the use of epidural neostigmine has not been investigated. The purpose of the current study was to define the analgesic effectiveness of epidural neostigmine coadministered with lidocaine and side effects in patients after minor orthopedic procedures.

Methods: After Institutional Review Board approval and informed consent, 48 patients (n = 12) undergoing knee surgery were randomly allocated to one of four groups and studied in a prospective way. After 0.05-0.1 mg/kg intravenous midazolam premedication, patients were randomized to receive 20 mg intrathecal bupivacaine plus epidural lidocaine (85 mg) with saline (control group); 1 [micro sign]g/kg epidural neostigmine (1 [micro sign]g group); 2 [micro sign]g kg epidural neostigmine (2 [micro sign]g group); or 4 [micro sign]g/kg epidural neostigmine (4 [micro sign]g group). The concept of the visual analog scale, which consisted of a 10-cm line with 0 equaling "no pain at all" and 10 equaling "the worst possible pain" was introduced. Post-operatively, pain was assessed using the visual analog scale, and intramuscular 75 mg diclofenac was available at patient request.

Results: Groups were demographically the same and did not differ in intraoperative characteristics (blood pressure, heart rate, ephedrine consumption, oxyhemoglobin saturation, sensory loss before start of surgery, or duration of sensory motor block). The visual analog scale score at first rescue analgesic and the incidence of adverse effects were similar among groups (P > 0.05). The time (min +/- SD) to first rescue analgesic was as follows: control group: 205 +/- 48; 1-[micro sign]g group: 529 +/- 314; 2-[micro sign]g group: 504 +/- 284; 4-[micro sign]g group: 547 +/- 263 (P < 0.05). The analgesic consumption (number of intramuscular diclofenac injections [mean, 25th-75th percentile]) in 24 h was as follows: control group: 3 [3 or 4]; 1-[micro sign]g group: 1[1 or 2]; 2-[micro sign]g group: 2[1 or 2]; 4-[micro sign]g group: 2[1-3](P < 0.05). The 24-h-pain visual analog scale score (cm +/- SD) that represents the overall impression for the last 24 h was as follows: control group: 5 +/- 1.6; 1-[micro sign]g group: 1.6 +/- 1.8; 2-[micro sign]g group: 1.4 +/- 1.6; 4-[micro sign]g group: 2.2 +/- 1.9 (P < 0.005). The incidence of adverse effects was similar among groups (P > 0.05).     

Oral Clonidine Premedication Blunts the Heart Rate Response to Intravenous Atropine in Awake Children

Background: Clonidine, which is known to have analgesic and sedative properties, has recently been shown to be an effective preanesthetic medication in children. The drug may cause side effects, including bradycardia and hypotension. This study was conducted to evaluate the ability of intravenous atropine to increase the heart rate (HR) in awake children receiving clonidine preanesthetic medication.

Methods: We studied 96 otherwise healthy children, 8-13 yr old, undergoing minor surgery. They received, at random, oral clonidine 2 or 4 micro gram *symbol* kg sup -1 or placebo 105 min before scheduled induction of anesthesia. Part I (n = 48, 16 per group): When hemodynamic parameters after insertion of a venous catheter had been confirmed to be stable, atropine was administered in incremental doses of 2.5, 2.5, and 5 micro gram *symbol* kg sup -1 every 2 min. The HR and blond pressure were recorded at 1-min intervals. Part II (n = 48, 16 per group): After the recording of baseline hemodynamic values, successive doses of atropine (5 micro gram *symbol* kg sup -1 every 2 min, to 40 micro gram *symbol* kg sup -1), were administered until HR increased by 20 beats *symbol* min sup -1. The HR and blood pressure were recorded at 1-min intervals.

Results: Part I: The increases in HR in response to a cumulative dose of atropine 10 micro gram *symbol* kg sup -1 were 33 plus/minus 3%, 16 plus/minus 3%, and 8 plus/minus 2% (mean plus/minus SEM) in children receiving placebo, clonidine 2 micro gram *symbol* kg sup -1, and clonidine 4 micro gram *symbol* kg sup -1, respectively (P < 0.05). Part II: The HR in the control group increased by more than 20 beats *symbol* min sup -1 in response to atropine 20 micro gram *symbol* kg sup -1 or less. In two patients in the clonidine 4 micro gram *symbol* kg sup -1 group, HR did not increase by 20 beats *symbol* min sup -1 even after 40 micro gram *symbol* kg sup -1 of atropine.     

Profound Increase in Epinephrine Concentration in Plasma and Cardiovascular Stimulation after [micro sign]-Opioid Receptor Blockade in Opioid-addicted Patients during Barbiturate-induced Anesthesia for Acute Detoxification

Background: Acute displacement of opioids from their receptors by administration of large doses of opioid antagonists during general anesthesia is a new approach for detoxification of patients addicted to opioids. The authors tested the hypothesis that [micro sign]-opioid receptor blockade by naloxone induces cardiovascular stimulation mediated by the sympathoadrenal system.

Methods: Heart rate, cardiac index, and intravascular pressures were measured in 10 patients addicted to opioids (drug history; mean +/- SD, 71 +/- 51 months) during a program of methadone substitution (96 +/- 57 mg/day). Cardiovascular variables and concentrations of catecholamine in plasma were measured in the awake state, during methohexital-induced anesthesia (dose, 74 +/- 44 micro gram [center dot] kg-1 [center dot] min-1) before administration of naloxone, and repeatedly during the first 3 h of [micro sign]-opioid receptor blockade. Naloxone was administered initially in an intravenous dose of 0.4 mg, followed by incremental bolus doses (0.8, 1.6, 3.2, and 6.4 mg) at 15-min intervals until a total dose of 12.4 mg had been administered within 60 min; administration was then continued by infusion (0.8 mg/h).

Results: Concentration of epinephrine in plasma increased 30-fold (15 +/- 9 to 458 +/- 304 pg/ml), whereas concentration of norepinephrine in plasma only increased to a minor extent (76 +/- 44 to 226 +/- 58 pg/ml, P < 0.05). Cardiac index increased by 74% (2.7 +/- 0.41 to 4.7 +/- 1.7 min-1 [center dot] m-2), because of increases in heart rate (89 +/- 16 to 108 +/- 17 beats/min) and stroke volume (+44%), reaching maximum 45 min after the initial injection of naloxone. In parallel, systemic vascular resistance index decreased (-40%). Systolic arterial pressure significantly increased (113 +/- 16 to 138 +/- 16 mmHg), whereas diastolic arterial pressure did not change.