The pharmacokinetics of sumatriptan when administered with norethindrone 1 mg/ethinyl estradiol 0.035 mg in healthy volunteers

BACKGROUND: Because the majority of migraineurs are young women in their peak reproductive years, it is important to understand the possible effects on the pharmacokinetics of both medications when sumatriptan is coadministered with an oral contraceptive (OC). OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to assess the effect of multiple dosing of the OC norethindrone 1 mg/ethinyl estradiol 0.035 mg (NE/EE) on the single-dose pharmacokinetics of sumatriptan in healthy volunteers. Secondary objectives were to determine the effect of a single dose of sumatriptan on the multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of NE and EE, and to assess the safety and tolerability of the combination. METHODS: This was an open-label, 1-sequence, crossover study in healthy women who had been receiving NE/EE for at least 3 months. Subjects received 1 cycle of NE/EE, consisting of 21 days of OC and 7 days of placebo. They also received a single dose of sumatriptan 50 mg on the last day of the OC or placebo regimen. Blood samples for the determination of plasma sumatriptan concentrations were collected on days 21 and 28, and blood samples for the determination of plasma NE and EE concentrations were collected on days 20 and 21. Treatments were compared by analysis of variance. Equivalence between treatments was to be concluded if the 90% Cl for the ratio of reference to test means for log(e)-transformed parameters (area under the plasma concentration-time curve [AUCI and maximum measured plasma concentration [C(max)]) for each analyte fell within the interval 0.80 to 1.25. RESULTS: Twenty-six women (mean age, 29.8 years; age range, 18-44 years; weight range, 52-82 kg) participated in the study. The 90% CI for the ratio of reference to test means for the AUC extrapolated to infinity (AUC(infinity)) of sumatriptan was 1.11 to 1.22, and the 90% CIs for the AUC over the dosing interval at steady state (AUC(tau)) of NE and EE were 0.96 to 1.00 and 0.91 to 0.97, respectively. The 90% CIs for the ratio of reference to test means for the C(max) of sumatriptan, NE, and EE were a respective 1.05 to 1.30, 0.76 to 0.88, and 0.88 to 1.04. Study treatments were well tolerated. Adverse events were mild or moderate, and there were no clinically significant changes in vital signs or laboratory values. CONCLUSIONS: The extent of absorption (AUC) of sumatriptan, NE, and EE was similar after oral administration of sumatriptan and NE/EE, both alone and in combination. Thus, in the opinion of the study investigators, there were no clinically relevant changes in the AUC of any of the medications when sumatriptan and NE/EE were administered concomitantly compared with administration alone. The results of this study suggest that dose adjustment is not necessary when sumatriptan is administered concomitantly with NE/EE in healthy premenopausal women.     

Effect of fluconazole on the pharmacokinetics of halofantrine in healthy volunteers

Background: Halofantrine, an antimalarial drug used in endemic areas such as the tropics is mainly metabolized by CYP3A4 to the active metabolite N‐desbutylhalofantrine. Fluconazole, an antifungal agent and an inhibitor of CYP3A4 is an established part of the therapy in HIV patients, who in turn are prone to malaria in the tropics. This study investigated the effect of fluconazole on the pharmacokinetics of halofantrine after concurrent administration of the two drugs. Methods: The effect of fluconazole on the pharmacokinetics of the antimalarial drug halofantrine was evaluated in 15 healthy volunteers in a Latin Square crossover design. The subjects received a single oral dose of 500 mg halofantrine hydrochloride alone or with 50 mg fluconazole after an overnight fast. Venous blood samples were collected during the next 336 h and analysed by HPLC for halofantrine and its active metabolite N‐desbutylhalofantrine. Results: Co‐administration of fluconazole did not alter the pharmacokinetics of halofantrine significantly with the exception of elimination t_1/2 that was significantly increased by 25% (P < 0·05). In contrast, fluconazole significantly altered the pharmacokinetic parameters of the active metabolite by reducing C_max, AUC and metabolite ratio (N‐desbutylhalofantrine/halofantrine) between 35 and 41% (P < 0·05) while increasing t_max by 50%. The 90% confidence intervals of the ratio of the geometric means (with/without fluconazole) were contained within 80–125% for halofantrine but outside this range for N‐desbutylhalofantrine. Conclusion: The decreased plasma concentrations of the metabolite are presumably caused by metabolic inhibition of CYP3A4 by fluconazole. Although the therapeutic consequences of this interaction are not clear caution should be exercised when co‐administering both drugs to avoid accumulation and subsequent cardiotoxic effects of halofantrine.     

Evaluation of the potential for pharmacokinetic interaction between tirabrutinib and levonorgestrel/ethinyl estradiol in healthy female volunteers

Tirabrutinib (TIRA), a potent and nonreversible oral Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is evaluated for treatment of certain hematological malignancies and inflammatory diseases. A drug–drug interaction study to evaluate the effect of TIRA on the pharmacokinetics of the oral contraceptive levonorgestrel (LEVO)/ethinyl estradiol (EE) was conducted in healthy female participants (N = 26). Participants received a single dose of LEVO (150 mcg)/EE (30 mcg) alone (reference), and on day 12 of a 15‐day regimen of TIRA 160 mg once‐daily (test). Intensive blood sampling for determination of LEVO, EE, and TIRA plasma concentrations was conducted, and safety was assessed throughout the study. Pharmacokinetic interactions were evaluated using 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the geometric least squares mean (GLSM) ratios of the test versus reference treatments. The GLSM (90% CI) ratios of area under the concentration‐time curve from zero to infinity (AUC_inf; LEVO: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.88–1.03, EE: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.05–1.16) and maximum plasma concentration (C_max; LEVO: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.74–0.98, EE: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.98–1.18) were within the prespecified 0.70 to 1.43 no effect bounds; and the AUC ratios met the stricter 0.80 to 1.25 equivalence bounds. Study treatments were generally well‐tolerated. In conclusion, co‐administration with TIRA did not alter the exposure of LEVO/EE, and accordingly LEVO/EE containing oral contraceptives can serve as a contraception method for participants on TIRA 160 mg (or lower) daily doses.

Study Highlights

• WHAT IS THE CURRENT KNOWLEDGE ON THE TOPIC?

Tirabrutinib (TIRA) is a Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor developed for treatment of certain hematological malignancies and inflammatory diseases. Due to teratogenic potential of TIRA, enrollment of women of childbearing age is contingent upon the use of highly effective contraception.

• WHAT QUESTION DID THIS STUDY ADDRESS?

The study evaluated the potential effect of TIRA 160 mg once‐daily regimen on the exposure of a hormonal oral contraceptive containing levonorgestrel (LEVO) and ethinyl estradiol (EE).

• WHAT DOES THIS STUDY ADD TO OUR KNOWLEDGE?

TIRA 160 mg once daily did not have any clinically relevant impact on the exposures of LEVO and EE.

• HOW MIGHT THIS CHANGE CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY OR TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE?

Combination oral contraception containing LEVO and EE can be allowed as a highly effective form of contraception during administration of TIRA at 160 mg once daily or lower daily doses.     

Effect of ginkgo biloba on the pharmacokinetics of raltegravir in healthy volunteers

Medicinal herbs may cause clinically relevant drug interactions with antiretroviral agents. Ginkgo biloba extract is a popular herbal product among HIV-infected patients because of its positive effects on cognitive function. Raltegravir, an HIV integrase inhibitor, is increasingly being used as part of combined antiretroviral therapy. Clinical data on the potential inhibitory or inductive effect of ginkgo biloba on the pharmacokinetics of raltegravir were lacking, and concomitant use was not recommended. We studied the effect of ginkgo biloba extract on the pharmacokinetics of raltegravir in an open-label, randomized, two-period, crossover phase I trial in 18 healthy volunteers. Subjects were randomly assigned to a regimen of 120 mg of ginkgo biloba twice daily for 15 days plus a single dose of raltegravir (400 mg) on day 15, a washout period, and 400 mg of raltegravir on day 36 or the test and reference treatments in reverse order. Pharmacokinetic sampling of raltegravir was performed up to 12 h after intake on an empty stomach. All subjects (9 male) completed the trial, and no serious adverse events were reported. Geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from dosing to infinity (AUC(0-∞)) and the maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) of raltegravir with ginkgo biloba versus raltegravir alone were 1.21 (0.93 to 1.58) and 1.44 (1.03 to 2.02). Ginkgo biloba did not reduce raltegravir exposure. The potential increase in the C(max) of raltegravir is probably of minor importance, given the large intersubject variability of raltegravir pharmacokinetics and its reported safety profile.     

Effect of omeprazole on the pharmacokinetics of oral gemifloxacin in healthy volunteers

This randomized, double-blind, 2-way crossover study investigated the effect of omeprazole on the pharmacokinetics of gemifloxacin, a novel fluoroquinolone. Thirteen healthy male volunteers received a 320 mg oral dose of gemifloxacin after 4 days of dosing with either omeprazole (40 mg once daily) or matching placebo. Blood was sampled for 48 h after dosing for determination of pharmacokinetic parameters. The mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)) and maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) for gemifloxacin were increased by, on average, 10% (90% confidence interval [CI], 0.89, 1.36) and 11% (90% CI, 0.87, 1.43), respectively, when gemifloxacin was given after omeprazole compared with after placebo. Neither the time to C(max) (T(max)) nor the half-life of gemifloxacin appeared to be affected by administration of omeprazole. There were no clinically relevant changes in adverse events, vital signs or the results of laboratory investigations after co-administration of omeprazole compared with placebo. In view of the modest increase in systemic exposure and the likely maximal increases indicated by the CIs, the effect of omeprazole on gemifloxacin pharmacokinetics is not considered to be clinically significant. Gemifloxacin and omeprazole can therefore be co-administered with no requirement for a dose adjustment. Copyright Copyright 1999 S. Karger AG, Basel     

Effect of sucralfate on pharmacokinetics of fleroxacin in healthy volunteers.

The effect of sucralfate on the pharmacokinetics of fleroxacin was assessed in 20 healthy male volunteers. The study was of a two-way crossover design in which subjects were randomized to one of the following two regimens at the time of entry: (i) a single 400-mg dose of fleroxacin alone or (ii) a 400-mg dose of fleroxacin given once and 1 g of sucralfate given every 6 h starting 24 h before fleroxacin treatment and continuing for 48 h after fleroxacin treatment. Blood samples were collected immediately before fleroxacin administration and at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 48 h postdosing. Fleroxacin concentrations in plasma and urine were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. While concurrent of fleroxacin and sucralfate resulted in a decrease in the area under the plasma concentration-time curve, a decrease in the maximum concentration, and an increase in the time to the maximum concentration (P < 0.05), these changes were modest compared with the interaction of other quinolones with sucralfate. The relative bioavailability of fleroxacin given with sucralfate, calculated from the area under the concentration-time curve, was 76% compared with that of fleroxacin alone. This is significantly better than the bioavailabilities of other quinolones (1.8 to 12.3%) when they are administered with sucralfate.     

The effect of isotretinoin on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ethinyl estradiol and norethindrone

BACKGROUND: Isotretinoin is a known teratogen, and when it is prescribed to women of childbearing potential, 2 forms of contraception must be used, commonly including hormonal contraception. Although isotretinoin and estradiol are metabolized largely by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and glucuronidation, the potential for clinical drug interaction, with subsequent pharmacodynamic impact, has not been evaluated. METHODS: We enrolled 26 healthy women who were to receive isotretinoin for the treatment of severe, recalcitrant nodular acne and who were taking or planning to take oral contraceptives. The pharmacokinetics of ethinyl estradiol and norethindrone (INN, norethisterone) (the components of Ortho Novum 7/7/7; Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc, Raritan, NJ) and pharmacodynamic assessments of oral contraceptive effectiveness (concentrations of serum progesterone, luteinizing hormone, and follicle-stimulating hormone) were determined on days 6 and 20 of 2 separate oral contraceptive cycles, before and during isotretinoin treatment. RESULTS: The addition of isotretinoin to the oral contraceptive regimen resulted in small and inconsistent, although statistically significant (P <.04), decreases in the concentrations of both ethinyl estradiol (9% decrease in area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to 24 hours after the dose on day 6) and norethindrone (11% decrease in maximum plasma concentration on day 20). Isotretinoin did not cause any statistically significant increases in pharmacodynamic markers, although a majority of women had increases in these measures. Although there was no correlation between isotretinoin (or metabolite) levels and oral contraceptive levels (P >.05), there was a correlation between progesterone level and oral contraceptive levels (P <.05). Variability was large for both pharmacokinetic measures (median coefficients of variation of 44%-69% [for each time point within a study period]) and pharmacodynamic measures (median coefficients of variation of 64%-114%). One woman in each study phase, one before and one during isotretinoin treatment, had a progesterone elevation consistent with possible ovulation. No serious or unexpected adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The small reduction in ethinyl estradiol and norethindrone levels associated with isotretinoin was not associated with any pharmacodynamic changes in our study. The combination of the teratogenic risk of isotretinoin and the large variability of and correlation between oral contraceptive levels and pharmacodynamic measures, however, strongly reinforces the necessity of additional contraceptive methods during concomitant administration of these drugs.     

Effect of zonisamide on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a combination ethinyl estradiol-norethindrone oral contraceptive in healthy women

BACKGROUND: Several antiepileptic drugs have clinically significant pharmacokinetic interactions with oral contraceptives (OCs) that may result in contraceptive failure. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the effect of zonisamide on the pharmacokinetics of the individual components of a combination OC (ethinyl estradiol [EE] 0.035 mg and norethindrone [NOR] 1 mg) and on pharmacodynamic variables that may be increased in the event of reduced contraceptive efficacy (concentrations of serum luteinizing hormone [LH], follicle-stimulating hormone [FSH], and progesterone). METHODS: This was a single-center, open-label, 1-sequence, crossover study. Healthy, premenopausal women received the combination OC for three 28-day cycles (combination OC for 21 days, followed by placebo for 7 days). Following stabilization on the OC during the first cycle, blood was collected during cycle 2 for the determination of serum EE and NOR profiles (day 14) and serum LH, FSH, and progesterone concentrations (days 13-15). Starting on day 15 of cycle 2, zonisamide was administered orally at 100 mg/d and titrated to a target dose of 400 mg/d. EE and NOR profiles and serum LH, FSH, and progesterone concentrations were obtained again in cycle 3 (in the presence of zonisamide) and compared with those from cycle 2 (in the absence of zonisamide). RESULTS: Thirty-seven healthy premenopausal women (mean age, 26.1 years [range, 18-51 years]; mean body weight, 65.5 kg [range, 50.4-93.1 kg]; mean height, 165.8 cm [range, 152.4-182.9 cm]) received > or =1 dose of zonisamide. Of the 33 subjects (89.2%) who completed the study, 26 (78.8%) underwent titration to a stable zonisamide dose of 400 mg/d. For EE, the mean (SD) AUC over a 24-hour dosing interval (AUC(tau)) was 1139 (317) pg.h/mL in cycle 2 and 1143 (312) pg.h/mL in cycle 3; the mean C(max) in the respective cycles was 133 (39) and 141 (46) pg/mL. For NOR, the corresponding values were 140 (48) and 159 (46) ng.h/mL for AUC(tau) and 21 (5.4) and 23 (6.7) ng/mL for C(max). The 90% Cls for the geometric mean ratios (cycle 3:cycle 2) for AUC(tau) and C(max) fell within the accepted range for lack of interaction (0.80-1.25). There were no increases in LH, FSH, or progesterone concentrations between cycle 2 and cycle 3. CONCLUSIONS: In these healthy volunteers, steady-state zonisamide dosing had no clinically significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of EE or NOR. There was no pharmacodynamic evidence that zonisamide is likely to reduce the contraceptive effectiveness of OCs containing EE and NOR.     

汉防己甲素片在健康人体内的药代动力学研究

目的建立测定人血浆中汉防己甲素浓度的高效液相色谱法。方法色谱柱:Kromasil C18(250 mm×4.6 mm,5μ.m);流动相:甲醇-乙腈-水-冰醋酸(体积比为30:15:55:0.8)(pH 6.2);检测波长:282 nm;汉防己乙素作为内标,用HPLC法测定人血浆中汉防己甲素浓度。结果汉防己甲素线性范围为0.5～14.0μg/mL,回归方程Y=0.007 6X-0.01875(r=0.9998);回收率>80%,日内和日间RSD均<10%。结论本方法简便、快速、准确,适用于汉防己甲素药代动力学研究及血药浓度监测。     

The pharmacokinetics of etanercept in healthy volunteers

OBJECTIVE: To describe the pharmacokinetics of etanercept when administered by subcutaneous injection in single doses to healthy volunteers. METHODS: Twenty-six healthy volunteers between 19 and 50 years of age received single doses of etanercept 25 mg by subcutaneous injection into the abdomen. Serial serum samples were collected for 21 days. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with a quantitation limit of 0.3 ng/mL was used to measure the drug concentrations. RESULTS: Etanercept was well tolerated by healthy volunteers. A one-compartment model was found to best describe the concentration-time data and was used to determine the pharmacokinetic parameters. Etanercept is slowly absorbed from the site of injection with a time of peak concentration (+/- SD) of 51 +/- 14 hours; peak concentration was 1.46 +/- 0.72 mg/L. The AUC was 235 +/-98 mg x h/L, apparent clearance was 132 +/- 85 mL/h, apparent volume of distribution was 12 +/- 6 L, and the half-life was 68 +/- 19 hours. CONCLUSIONS: Etanercept was slowly absorbed and slowly eliminated after subcutaneous administration. Dosing at the recommended rate of 25 mg twice weekly would be expected to result in concentrations of approximately 3 mg/L. Intersubject variability for apparent clearance in healthy volunteers was 64%.     

Effect of meal timing on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tegoprazan in healthy male volunteers

AbstractTegoprazan, a novel potassium‐competitive acid blocker, is used to treat acid‐related diseases. However, there is no information on the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) profiles of the marketed dosage of tegoprazan under various meal timings in a fed and fasted state. The study aimed to assess the effect of meal timing on PKs and PDs of tegoprazan 50 mg after a single administration in healthy male subjects. An open‐label, single‐dose, three‐treatment, three‐period crossover study was conducted. A total of 12 subjects were orally administered a single dose of tegoprazan 50 mg among various conditions: in a fasted state, at 30 min before or 30 min after a high‐fat meal. PK parameters were estimated by the noncompartmental method. Continuous 24‐h intragastric pH monitoring was done for PD analysis. The PKs and PDs of tegoprazan were compared among the various meal timings. Compared with the fasting condition, the PK profile of tegoprazan was similar when administered 30 min before a high‐fat meal; however, delayed absorption with similar systemic exposure was observed when administered 30 min after a high‐fat meal. The magnitude of acid suppression evaluated through the PD parameters increased when administered 30 min after a high‐fat meal compared with fasting the condition and when administered 30 min before a high‐fat meal. However, the increased difference in acid suppression was not clinically significant. Meal timing had no clinically significant effect on the PKs and PDs of tegoprazan 50 mg. Therefore, the marketed dosage of tegoprazan could be administered regardless of the meal timing. Study Highlights

• WHAT IS THE CURRENT KNOWLEDGE ON THE TOPIC?

Tegoprazan, a novel potassium‐competitive acid blocker, is used to treat acid‐related diseases.

• WHAT QUESTION DID THIS STUDY ADDRESS?

This study evaluated the effect of food on pharmacokinetics (PKs) and pharmacodynamics (PDs) of tegoprazan under various mealtime conditions.

• WHAT DOES THIS STUDY ADD TO OUR KNOWLEDGE?

This study showed that delayed absorption of tegoprazan was observed at “after meal condition,” however, the amount of systemic exposure of “after meal condition” was similar to “fasting condition” and “before meal condition.” In addition, gastric acid suppression of tegoprazan was similar between fasting condition and before meal condition, whereas increased gastric acid suppression was observed at after meal condition.

• HOW MIGHT THIS CHANGE CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY OR TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE?

In the actual clinical environment, patients take medicine under various fed conditions. This study evaluated the effect of food on PKs and PDs of tegoprazan in various clinical conditions, and provided the important information about meal timing when administering tegoprazan.     

Effect of rifampin on steady-state pharmacokinetics of atazanavir with ritonavir in healthy volunteers

Mycobacterium tuberculosis is a concern in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Rifampin (RIF), an agent used against M. tuberculosis, is contraindicated with most HIV protease inhibitors. Atazanavir (ATV) has clinical efficacy comparable to a standard of care regimen in naive patients and, when dosed with low-dose ritonavir (RTV), also in treatment-experienced patients. We evaluated here the safety and pharmacokinetics of ATV, resulting from three regimens of ATV, RTV, and RIF in 71 healthy subjects. The pharmacokinetics for ATV and RTV were assessed after 6 and 10 days of dosing with ATV 400 mg (n = 53) and with ATV-RTV at 300 and 100 mg (ATV/RTV 300/100; n = 52), respectively. Steady-state pharmacokinetics for ATV, RTV, RIF, and desacetyl-rifampin (des-RIF) were measured after 10 days of dosing of ATV/RTV/RIF 300/100/600 (n = 17), ATV/RTV/RIF 300/200/600 (n = 17), or ATV/RTV/RIF 400/200/600 (n = 14). An RIF 600-alone arm was enrolled as a control group (n = 18). With ATV/RTV/RIF 400/200/600, ATV area under the concentration-time curve values were comparable, but the C(min) values were lower relative to ATV 400 alone. ATV exposures were substantially reduced for the other RIF-containing regimens relative to ATV 400 alone and for all regimens relative to ATV/RTV 300/100 alone. RIF and des-RIF exposures were 1.6- to 2.5-fold higher than with RIF 600 alone. The incidence of grade 3/4 alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase values was limited to 1 subject each in both the ATV/RTV/RIF 300/200/600 and the ATV/RTV/RIF 400/200/600 treatments. Coadministration of ATV with RIF was safe and generally well tolerated. Since ATV exposures were reduced in all regimens, ATV and RIF should not be coadministered at the dosing regimens studied.     

Gender-related effects on metoprolol pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in healthy volunteers

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there are gender-specific differences in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of metoprolol enantiomers. METHODS: Twenty normal volunteers (10 men and 10 women) received 100 mg oral metoprolol tartrate twice daily for a total of nine doses. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics were studied after the last dose. Subjects also completed a control pharmacodynamic study; the order of drug and control studies was randomized. Measurements of heart rate and systolic blood pressure were obtained during peak submaximal bicycle exercise testing. (R)-Metoprolol and (S)-metoprolol concentrations were determined by stereospecific HPLC. The percentage difference in exercise heart rate and systolic blood pressure (metoprolol versus control), and (R)- and (S)-metoprolol plasma concentrations were comodeled. RESULTS: Men and women showed stereoselective pharmacokinetics; (S)-metoprolol concentrations were significantly greater than those for (R)-metoprolol for both groups. Women had greater drug exposure than men (higher maximum concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve). No differences were observed between genders with respect to elimination half-life. Females had a greater reduction in exercise heart rate and systolic blood pressure; however, the area under the effect curve was significantly greater for heart rate only. Pharmacodynamic data were best fitted by the Hill equation with the effect site in the central compartment. The fitted maximum effect and the concentration at one-half of the maximum effect for heart rate and systolic blood pressure did not differ between men and women (P > .20). CONCLUSIONS: Gender-related differences exist in the pharmacokinetics of metoprolol enantiomers, resulting in greater drug exposure in female subjects. However, concentration-effect relationships did not differ between men and women. Therefore the observed differences in drug effects were the result of gender-specific differences in metoprolol pharmacokinetics.     

Bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of ofloxacin in healthy volunteers.

The pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of ofloxacin in 20 healthy male volunteers were studied in an open-label, randomized, two-way crossover study. Ofloxacin (400 mg) was administered either as a 1-h infusion or as an oral tablet. The mean peak concentration after intravenous infusion was 4.30 +/- 0.69 microgram/ml, and that after oral administration was 3.14 +/- 0.53 microgram/ml, occurring 1.74 +/- 0.57 h after dosing. The bioavailability (F) of the oral dosage form of ofloxacin was virtually identical to that of the intravenous form (F = 105% +/- 7%). This complete bioavailability of ofloxacin is supportive of the use of the oral dosage form for the treatment of infections in hospitalized patients either as a replacement for intravenous ofloxacin therapy or in streamlining therapy from the intravenous to the oral route.     

Multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of ceftibuten in healthy volunteers.

The pharmacokinetics of ceftibuten, a new cephalosporin antibiotic, and its conversion product, ceftibutentrans, were studied in healthy male volunteers following daily oral administration of a 400-mg capsule for 7 days. Mean concentrations of ceftibuten in plasma obtained on day 5 were similar to those obtained on day 7. Analysis of variance indicated that the concentrations in plasma on days 5 and 7 were at steady state. The mean accumulation factor was 1.14 for day 5 and 1.13 for day 7. The half-life (2.4 h) was independent of the duration of drug administration, and the mean maximum concentration of drug in plasma was 18 to 19 micrograms/ml. Urinary excretion was the major elimination route for ceftibuten, by which 57 to 59% of the drug was excreted unchanged over a 24-h period. The amounts of ceftibuten-trans in plasma and urine were low.     

Effect of combination therapy with ciprofloxacin and clarithromycin on theophylline pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers.

Five adults completed this four-way randomized crossover study to compare the effects of oral treatment with ciprofloxacin, clarithromycin, and a combination of the two drugs on theophylline pharmacokinetics. The area under the concentration-time curve for theophylline during combination therapy was not different from that for ciprofloxacin alone. Beta error may explain this finding, but any real effect from combination treatment appears to be clinically unimportant.