Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Rechallenge Safety and Efficacy in Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients After Immune-Related Adverse Events

BackgroundDespite their anti-tumor efficacy, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are associated with a variety of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Grade ≥ 2 irAEs require ICI discontinuation. The decision to resume ICI treatment often remains challenging.MethodsWe retrospectively studied 1051 adult patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with ICIs at a single institution between January 2015 and December 2020, and identified 99 (9.4%) patients with grade≥2 irAEs necessitating treatment interruption. Forty patients underwent retreatment (rechallenged group), while 59 discontinued the treatment (discontinued group).ResultsBaseline characteristics of patients in the 2 groups were similar. Initial irAEs were less severe in the rechallenged group. After rechallenging, 24 of 40 (60%) patients had recurrence of the same or de-novo irAEs. Twenty (50%) developed second grade≥ 2 irAEs. No grade 4 irAE or irAE-related death occurred after rechallenging. Using multivariate analysis, no statistically significant differences in overall survival (OS) (HR: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.57-2.15, P = .77) or progression-free survival (PFS) (HR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.45-1.71, P = .69) were noted between the 2 groups, while the best objective response prior to the initial irAEs was the only variable affecting OS and PFS.ConclusionsRechallenge was associated with a relative high risk of second grade≥ 2 irAEs. The risk was less if the initial irAEs were resolved. No differences were seen in survival outcomes of patients who had ICI rechallenge and those who did not. Permanent ICI discontinuation is an appropriate strategy after grade≥ 2 irAEs, especially severe irAEs.     

Immune checkpoint inhibitor toxicity and associated outcomes in older patients with cancer

IntroductionIncreased immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) use in various advanced cancer types has led to a parallel rise in immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Despite widespread use, ICI data in older patients remains limited. We investigate irAE prevalence in older patients receiving ICI and whether irAEs and survival are associated.Materials and MethodsOur retrospective study included patients aged ≥65 years with advanced malignancies who had ≥1 dose of ICI from January 2011 through September 2019. We evaluated irAE cases and their respective grades and assessed oncological response by progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).ResultsMean age of 210 patients was 75.0 ± 7.2 years, 58.1% were men, and most were white. IrAE prevalence was 41.4% (n = 87); 9.5% (n = 20) developed multisystem irAE. Most irAEs were grades 1 and 2 (27.6% and 49.4%, respectively), while grades 3 and 4 accounted for 17.2% and 5.8%, respectively. No grade 5 irAE occurred. Compared with patients with no irAEs, those with irAEs had improved OS (HR [hazard ratio], 0.41; 95% CI [confidence interval], 0.282–0.597; p < 0.0001) and PFS (HR, 0.311; 95% CI: 0.213–0.453; p < 0.0001). Improved OS was seen with irAE grades 1 and 2 versus grades 3 and 4 (HR, 0.344; 95% CI: 0.171–0.694; p = 0.0029). Similarly, improved PFS was seen with lower grade irAE (HR, 0.489; 95% CI: 0.247–0.965; p = 0.0391).DiscussionThe irAE prevalence in older patients was similar to that in younger patients. To our knowledge, this is one of few studies that confirms a positive association of irAE on both OS and PFS in older patients with cancer, and improved OS and PFS with lower versus higher grade irAE.     

Efficacy and safety of sequential therapy with sorafenib and regorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a two-center study in China

BackgroundRegorafenib is a standard 2nd-line treatment for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but the efficacy and safety of sequential therapy with sorafenib and regorafenib among advanced HCC patients in China is not clear.MethodsThis was a retrospective, two-center, cohort study of advanced HCC patients who received sequential therapy of sorafenib and regorafenib from October 2018 to April 2020 at 2 Chinese institutions. The patients were converted directly to regorafenib after failing to respond to sorafenib monotherapy. The patients underwent evaluations every 4–6 weeks to determine the efficacy and safety of the treatment according to physiological, laboratory, and radiological results. A radiological evaluation using computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging scans was conducted. The outcomes included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).ResultsA total of 43 patients received regorafenib as a 2nd-line treatment after sorafenib progression. Of these patients, 26 (60.5%) and 17 (39.5%) were diagnosed with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stages B and C, respectively. The median PFS was 11.0 [95% confidence interval (CI): 5.8–16.2] months, and the median OS was 17.0 (95% CI: 12.8–21.2) months. Conversely, the most common toxicities were hand-foot skin reaction (48.8%), diarrhea (32.6%), and hypertension (14%). The most common grade 3–4 toxicities were hypoalbuminemia (4.7%), anemia (4.7%), and thrombocytopenia (4.7%). Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) ≥400, alanine transaminase (ALT) ≥60 IU/L, and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) ≥60 IU/L before 2nd-line treatment were associated with PFS in the univariable analyses. The Cox proportional-hazards regression analysis showed that AFP [hazard ratio (HR) =0.225; 95% CI: 0.073–0.688; P=0.009], ALT (HR =0.195; 95% CI: 0.051–0.741; P=0.016), AST (HR =0.209; 95% CI: 0.063–0.697; P=0.011), and presence of extrahepatic metastasis (HR =0.074; 95% CI: 0.009–0.608; P=0.015) before 2nd-line treatment were independently associated with PFS.ConclusionsThe sequential therapy of sorafenib and regorafenib is well-tolerated and effective in advanced HCC patients after sorafenib progression based on our two-center real-world data. Patients with good liver function reserve and a high level of AFP before 2nd-line treatment may benefit from sequential treatment. These results still need further validation.     

Bridging The Age Gap: observational cohort study of effects of chemotherapy and trastuzumab on recurrence,survival and quality of life in older women with early breast cancer

Background Chemotherapy improves outcomes for high risk early breast cancer (EBC) patients but is infrequently offered to older individuals. This study determined if there are fit older patients with high-risk disease who may benefit from chemotherapy.Methods A multicentre, prospective, observational study was performed to determine chemotherapy (±trastuzumab) usage and survival and quality-of-life outcomes in EBC patients aged ≥70 years. Propensity score-matching adjusted for variation in baseline age, fitness and tumour stage.Results Three thousands four hundred sixteen women were recruited from 56 UK centres between 2013 and 2018. Two thousands eight hundred eleven (82%) had surgery. 1520/2811 (54%) had high-risk EBC and 2059/2811 (73%) were fit. Chemotherapy was given to 306/1100 (27.8%) fit patients with high-risk EBC. Unmatched comparison of chemotherapy versus no chemotherapy demonstrated reduced metastatic recurrence risk in high-risk patients(hazard ratio [HR] 0.36 [95% CI 0.19–0.68]) and in 541 age, stage and fitness-matched patients(adjusted HR 0.43 [95% CI 0.20–0.92]) but no benefit to overall survival (OS) or breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) in either group. Chemotherapy improved survival in women with oestrogen receptor (ER)-negative cancer (OS: HR 0.20 [95% CI 0.08–0.49];BCSS: HR 0.12 [95% CI 0.03–0.44]).Transient negative quality-of-life impacts were observed.Conclusions Chemotherapy was associated with reduced risk of metastatic recurrence, but survival benefits were only seen in patients with ER-negative cancer. Quality-of-life impacts were significant but transient.Trial Registration ISRCTN 46099296Subject terms: Chemotherapy, Breast cancer     

Analysis of characteristics and predictive factors of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related adverse events

Objective:We aimed to retrospectively analyze the toxicity profiles and predictors of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) as well as the correlation between irAEs and the clinical efficacy of multi-type immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with advanced pan-cancer in a real-world setting.Methods:We retrospectively analyzed data from 105 patients with advanced pan-cancer treated with multi-type ICIs at the First Hospital of Jilin University between January 1, 2016 and August 1, 2020. We used logistic regression analyses to investigate the associations of irAEs with clinical baseline characteristics, blood count parameters, and biochemical indicators during treatment. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine cutoff values for parameters and area under the curve values. Kaplan–Meier and Cox multivariate regression analyses were performed to estimate the relationships of baseline characteristics and irAEs with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).Results:A lower relative lymphocyte count (cutoff = 28.5%), higher albumin level (cutoff = 39.05 g/L), and higher absolute eosinophil count (AEC) (cutoff = 0.175 × 10⁹/L) were significantly associated with the occurrence of irAEs, among which a higher AEC (cutoff = 0.205 × 10⁹/L) was strongly associated with skin-related irAEs [odds ratios (ORs) = 0.163, P = 0.004]. Moreover, a higher lactate dehydrogenase level (cutoff = 237.5 U/L) was an independent predictor of irAEs of grade ≥ 3 (OR = 0.083, P = 0.023). In immune cell subgroup analysis, a lower absolute count of CD8⁺CD28⁻ suppressor T cells (OR = 0.806; 95% confidence interval: 0.643–1.011; P = 0.062), which are regulatory T lymphocytes, was associated with the occurrence of irAEs, although the difference was not statistically significant. Furthermore, a higher percentage of CD19⁺ B cells was associated with the occurrence of irAEs of grade ≥ 3 (P = 0.02) and grade ≥ 2 (P = 0.051). In addition, patients with any grade of irAE had a significantly high PFS (8.37 vs. 3.77 months, hazard ratios (HR) = 2.02, P = 0.0038) and OS (24.77 vs. 13.83 months, HR = 1.84; P = 0.024).Conclusions:This retrospective study reports clinical profile data for irAEs in unselected patients in a real-world setting and explored some parameters that may be potential predictive markers of the occurrence, type, or grade of irAEs in clinical practice. Evidence of a correlation between safety and efficacy may facilitate a complete assessment of the risk-benefit ratio for patients treated with ICIs.     

Comparison of prognostic factors of esophageal cancer between a Chinese cohort and the Surveillance,Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database: a retrospective cohort study

BackgroundEsophageal cancer is a highly aggressive, early metastasis gastrointestinal malignancy, with geographic differences in prognosis. It is unknown whether there are differences in the survival in different regions among esophageal cancer patients who underwent the treatments. This study was to explore the influencing factors of esophageal cancer survival in patients from China and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.MethodsThe retrospective cohort study were conducted with 605 Chinese esophageal cancer patients in the Wuxi People’s Hospital and 2,351 patients from the SEER database. The demographic and clinical data were collected from the two cohort, respectively. The outcome was the death during the follow-up. The follow-up ended on November 30, 2021. The Cox proportional hazards model was used in the univariate and multivariate survival analyses, with hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI).ResultsIn group one, the following were identified as the prognostic factors: female gender (HR =0.568; 95% CI: 0.398–0.811), T3 and T4 stages (HR =3.312; 95% CI: 2.493–4.401), N2 and N3 stages (HR =3.562; 95% CI: 2.631–4.824), and other subtypes of cancer (HR =0.393; 95% CI: 0.223–0.693). The following prognostic were factors identified in group two: age ≥65 years (HR =1.16; 95% CI: 1.058–1.276), female gender (HR =0.843; 95% CI: 0.752–0.945), T3 and T4 stages (HR =1.523; 95% CI: 1.373–1.690), M1 stage (HR =2.554; 95% CI: 2.303–2.832), treatment with surgery and chemotherapy (HR =0.507; 95% CI: 0.457–0.562), and other subtypes of cancer (HR =1.432; 95% CI: 1.298–1.581).ConclusionsThere may be some differences in prognostic factors between Chinese and American patients with esophageal cancer. It is indicated that different management strategies of esophageal cancer should be considered in different populations to improve the prognosis of patients.     

High neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio following stereotactic body radiation therapy is associated with poor clinical outcomes in patients with borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer

BackgroundThe purpose of this study is to report on the prognostic role of pre- and post-stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in a cohort of patients with borderline resectable (BRPC) and locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) who was treated with multi-agent induction chemotherapy followed by five-fraction SBRT.MethodsPatients treated with multi-agent induction chemotherapy followed by SBRT from August 2016 to January 2019 and who had laboratory values available for review were included in the study. Univariate (UVA) and multivariate analyses (MVA) were performed to determine associations between pre-/post-SBRT NLR and overall survival (OS), local progression-free survival (LPFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and progression-free survival (PFS).ResultsA total of 156 patients were treated with multi-agent induction chemotherapy followed by SBRT and had laboratory values available for review. On UVA, chemotherapy duration ≥4 months, poorly differentiated disease, inability to undergo resection, pre-SBRT ANC ≥3.7 No./µL, pre-SBRT NLR ≥2.3, and post-SBRT NLR ≥2.6 were associated with worse OS. Patients with post-SBRT NLR ≥2.6 had a median OS of 16.7 months versus median OS not yet reached in patients with post-SBRT <2.6 (P=0.009). On MVA, poorly differentiated disease [hazard ratio (HR) =1.82, 95% CI: 1.04–3.18, P=0.035], inability to undergo resection (HR =2.17, 95% CI: 1.25–3.70, P=0.006), and post-SBRT NLR ≥2.6 (HR =2.55, 95% CI: 1.20–5.45, P=0.015) were associated with inferior OS. On UVA, baseline CA 19-9 ≥219 U/mL, pre-SBRT platelet count ≥157×1,000/µL, and post-SBRT NLR ≥2.6 were associated with inferior LPFS. Patients with post-SBRT NLR ≥2.6 had a median LPFS of 18.3 months versus median LPFS not yet reached in patients with post-SBRT <2.6 (P=0.028). On MVA, only post-SBRT NLR ≥2.6 was associated with worse LPFS (HR =3.22, 95% CI: 1.04–9.98, P=0.043).ConclusionsPost-SBRT NLR ≥2.6 predicted for inferior OS and LPFS in BRPC/LAPC patients treated with multi-agent chemotherapy and SBRT. These findings highlight the importance of further elucidating the immunologic effects of radiation therapy in this setting, which may have significant implications on both radiation design as well as combination strategies.     

Association between hospital treatment volume and survival of women with gynecologic malignancy in Japan: a JSOG tumor registry-based data extraction study

ObjectiveAssociations between hospital treatment volume and survival outcomes for women with 3 types of gynecologic malignancies, and the trends and contributing factors for high-volume centers were examined.MethodsThe Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology tumor registry databased retrospective study examined 206,845 women with 80,741, 73,647, and 52,457 of endometrial, cervical, and ovarian tumor, respectively, who underwent primary treatment in Japan between 2004 and 2015. Associations between the annual treatment volume and overall survival (OS) for each tumor type were examined using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model with restricted cubic splines. Institutions were categorized into 3 groups (low-, moderate-, and high-volume centers) based on hazard risks.ResultsHazard ratio (HR) for OS each the 3 tumors decreased with hospital treatment volume. The cut-off points of treatment volume were defined for high- (≥50, ≥51, and ≥27), moderate- (20–49, 20–50, and 17–26), and low-volume centers (≤19, ≤19, and ≤16) by cases/year for endometrial, cervical, and ovarian tumors, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed younger age, rare tumor histology, and initial surgical management as contributing factors for women at high-volume centers (all, p<0.001). The proportion of high-volume center treatments decreased, whereas low-volume center treatments increased (all p<0.001). Treatment at high-volume centers improved OS than that at other centers (adjusted HR [aHR]=0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.78–0.88; aHR=0.78, 95% CI=0.75–0.83; and aHR=0.90, 95% CI=0.86–0.95 for endometrial, cervical, and ovarian tumors).ConclusionHospital treatment volume impacted survival outcomes. Treatments at high-volume centers conferred survival benefits for women with gynecologic malignancies. The proportion of treatments at high-volume centers have been decreasing recently.     

Immune-related adverse events in older adults: Data mining of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System

IntroductionRecent studies reveal that there is no difference in the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) between younger adults and older adults. However, it remains unclear whether age is a risk factor for immune-related adverse events (irAEs).Materials and methodsTo analyze the association between irAEs and age based on data from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database between January 2004 and December 2020, we performed a case/noncase study on ICI-related adverse events. Cases were defined as adverse event cases with ICI therapy and irAEs, and noncases were defined as adverse event cases with ICI therapy and without irAEs. One case was matched to a noncase using the sex, reporter, report year, and type of ICI regimen. The reporting odds ratios (RORs) were used to assess the disproportionality of irAEs between older adults (≥65 years) and younger adults (<65 years).ResultsThe study shows that compared with younger adults, the ROR of older adults was 1.12 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.08–1.16) and 1.18 (95% CI: 1.14–1.23) before and after matching, respectively. The signal of age-related irAEs was detected in patients treated with ICI monotherapy but not in patients treated with combination therapy. Further analysis revealed a spectrum of age-related toxicities including cardiovascular toxicities, lung toxicities, musculoskeletal toxicities, nervous system toxicities, renal toxicities, and skin toxicities.ConclusionIn this analysis performed based on the FAERS, irAE cases were more likely to be reported in older adults. Our pharmacovigilance study complements the safety data of clinical trials. Further studies are expected to explore the underlying reasons for irAEs in older adults.     

Survival and prognostic factors for postoperative primary appendiceal cancer: a retrospective cohort study based on the Surveillance,Epidemiology, and End Results database

BackgroundThe factors affecting the postoperative survival of patients with primary appendiceal cancer (PAC) have yet to be fully explored. And there are no clear guidelines for adjuvant treatment after appendectomy. Whether chemotherapy can prolong patient survival after appendectomy, is critical in guiding postoperative medications. The majority of studies on appendiceal cancer are single case reports, and they focused on the incidence of appendiceal cancer. The present study aimed to investigate the survival characteristics of patients with primary appendiceal cancer after surgery using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.MethodsThe data of 2,891 cases of primary appendiceal cancer between 2004 to 2015 were obtained from the SEER database and subjected to survival analysis using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional-hazards model. The annual percentage change (APC) was calculated using the weighted least squares method.ResultsThe overall age-adjusted incidence rate per 100,000 population steadily increased from 0.58 in 2004 to 1.63 in 2015. For patients who received chemotherapy, the median overall survival (OS) was 65 months and the 5-year OS rate was 51.9%, and for patients who did not receive chemotherapy or whose chemotherapy status was unknown, the median OS was not reached and the 5-year OS rate was 78.9%. Age [35< age <69: hazard radio (HR) =2.147; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.442–3.197, P<0.001; age >69: HR =5.259; 95% CI: 3.485–7.937, P<0.001], race (White race: HR =0.728; 95% CI: 0.590–0.899, P=0.003), histologic type (mucinous neoplasm: HR =0.690; 95% CI: 0.580–0.821, P<0.001; malignant carcinoid: HR =0.657; 95% CI: 0.536–0.806, P<0.001), grade (II: HR =1.794; 95% CI: 1.471–2.187, P<0.001; III: HR =2.905; 95% CI: 2.318–3.640, P<0.001; IV: HR =3.128; 95% CI: 2.159–4.533, P<0.001), and stage (localized: HR =0.236; 95% CI: 0.194–0.287, P<0.001; regional: HR =0.425; 95% CI: 0.362–0.499, P<0.001) were identified as independent predictors of survival. And after adjusting for known factors (age, sex, race, tumor size, marital status, histologic type, grade, stage), chemotherapy (HR =1.220; 95% CI: 1.050–1.417, P=0.009) was revealed to be an independent indicator of poor prognosis.ConclusionsThere was an increasing trend in the incidence of appendiceal cancer in the United States between 2004 and 2015. Chemotherapy was revealed to be an independent indicator of poor prognosis, which provide valuable insight into the therapy of primary appendiceal cancer. Large clinical trials of chemotherapy and targeted therapy for appendiceal cancer are urgently needed.     

Prognostic value of systemic immune-inflammatory index in survival outcome in gastric cancer: a meta-analysis

BackgroundIn recent years, many studies have reported that the systemic immune-inflammatory index (SII) can be used to predict the prognosis of cancer patients; however, this finding remains controversial in gastric cancer (GC). Therefore, the purpose of this study was to systematically and comprehensively probe the prognostic role of SII in GC.MethodsRelevant publications were extracted from PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library databases, and WANFANG DATA (Chinese database). The included studies had patients with pathologically confirmed GC and long-term follow-up data. The patient''s outcome was death, recurrence, or status at the end of follow-up. The studies included randomized controlled tests, case-control studies, or cohort studies using a multivariate proportional hazard model adjusted for survival outcomes. Cochran’s Q test and Higgins’ I-squared statistic were performed to assess heterogeneity. Publication bias was assessed by visual inspection of a Begg’s funnel plot.ResultsA total of 6,925 patients in 11 studies were included. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) indicated that a higher SII value was significantly associated with worse overall survival (OS) [HR: 1.53, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.27–1.83] and worse disease-free survival (DFS) (HR: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.24–1.97) in GC patients. In the subgroup analysis, the HR was 1.72 (95% CI: 1.51–1.95) and 1.27 (95% CI: 0.96–1.67) in the group of patients aged <59 and ≥59 years, respectively.ConclusionsThe pooled HR indicates that a higher SII in younger patients with GC predicts a poor prognosis. In elderly patients with GC, the prognostic role of SII needs further research.     

Chemoradiotherapy for patients with locally advanced or unresectable extra-hepatic biliary cancer

BackgroundAlthough surgical resection is the preferred curative-intent treatment option for patients with non-metastatic, extra-hepatic biliary cancer (EBC), radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) may be utilized in select cases when surgical resection is not feasible. The purpose of this study is to report the efficacy and adverse events (AEs) associated with CRT for patients with locally advanced and unresectable EBC.MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study of patients with EBC, including extra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma or gallbladder cancer, deemed inoperable who received RT between 1998 and 2018. The median RT dose was 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions and 94% received concurrent 5-fluorouracil. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) from the start of RT. The cumulative incidence of local progression (LP), locoregional progression (LRP), and distant metastasis (DM) were reported with death as a competing risk. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess for correlation between patient and treatment characteristics and outcomes.ResultsForty-eight patients were included for analysis. The median OS was 12.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.3–73.2 months]. The 2-, 3-, and 5-year OS were 33% (95% CI: 22–50%), 20% (95% CI: 11–36%), and 7% (95% CI: 2–20%), respectively. The 2-year PFS, LP, LRP, and DM were 21% (95% CI: 12–36%), 27% (95% CI: 17–44%), 31% (95% CI: 20–48%), and 33% (95% CI: 22–50%), respectively. On univariate analysis, biologically effective dose (BED) >59.5 Gy₁₀ was associated with improved OS [hazard ratio (HR): 0.40, 95% CI: 0.18–0.92, P=0.03] and PFS (HR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.16–0.84, P=0.02) and primary tumor size (per 1 cm increase) was associated with worsened PFS (HR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.02–1.63, P=0.04). BED >59.5 Gy₁₀ remained associated with PFS on multivariate analysis (HR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.15–0.78, P=0.01). Treatment-related grade 3+ acute and late gastrointestinal AEs occurred in 13% and 17% of patients, respectively.ConclusionsRT is associated with 3- and 5-year survival in a subset of patients with unresectable EBC. Further exploration of the role of RT as part of a multi-modality curative treatment strategy is warranted.     

Survival benefits of retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for optimally-resected advanced ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma: a multi-institutional retrospective study

ObjectiveThe survival benefits of retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy (RLNA) for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) remain controversial because clinical behaviors differ among subtypes. The purpose of the present study was to clarify whether RLNA increases the survival rate of advanced high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC).MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort analysis of 3,227 patients with EOC treated between 1986 and 2017 at 14 institutions. Among them, 335 patients with stage IIB-IV HGSC who underwent optimal cytoreduction (residual tumor of <1 cm) were included. Patients were divided into the RLNA group (n=170) and non-RLNA group (n=165). All pathological slides were assessed based on a central pathological review. Oncologic outcomes were compared between the two groups in the original and weighted cohorts adjusted with the inverse probability of treatment weighting.ResultsThe median observation period was 49.8 (0.5–241.5) months. Overall, 219 (65%) out of 335 patients had recurrence or progression, while 146 (44%) died of the disease. In the original cohort, RLNA was a significant prognostic factor for longer progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio [HR]=0.741; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.558–0.985) and overall survival (OS) (HR=0.652; 95% CI=0.459–0.927). In the weighted cohort in which all variables were well balanced as standardized differences decreased, RLNA was also a significant prognostic factor for more favorable oncologic outcomes (PFS, adjusted HR=0.742; 95% CI=0.613–0.899) and OS, adjusted HR=0.620; 95% CI=0.488–0.787).ConclusionThe present study demonstrated that RLNA for stage III-IV HGSC with no residual tumor after primary debulking surgery contributed to better oncologic outcomes.     

Combined Immunotherapy and Stereotactic Radiotherapy Improves Neurologic Outcomes in Patients with Non–small-cell Lung Cancer Brain Metastases

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) alone versus SRT and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).Patients and MethodsPatients treated for their first diagnosis of intracranial metastases with SRT or SRT plus ICI were retrospectively identified. Overall survival (OS), local control (LC), distant brain failure (DBF), neurologic death, and rates of radiation necrosis were calculated. Univariate (UVA) and multivariable (MVA) analyses with competing risk analysis were performed.ResultsSeventy-seven patients with 132 lesions were analyzed, including 44 patients with 68 lesions in the SRT group and 33 patients with 64 lesions in the SRT plus ICI group. There were no differences in baseline factors between groups. Use of ICI predicted for decreased DBF (hazard ratio [HR], 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24-0.84; P = .01), decreased rates of neurologic death (HR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.10-0.85; P = .02), and better OS (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.23-0.91; P = .03). Two-year LC was 97% for the SRT + ICI group, and 86% for the SRT-alone group (P = .046). Actuarial 2-year DBF was 39% for the SRT + ICI group and 66% for the SRT alone group (P = .016). On MVA, ICI use persisted in predicting lower incidence of neurologic death (HR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.09-0.72; P = .01) and DBF (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.25-0.85; P = .01) when adjusted for competing risk of death.ConclusionIn this cohort of patients with NSCLC brain metastases, ICI use combined with SRT predicted for improved LC and OS and decreased DBF and risk of neurologic death.     

Predictive effect of J waves on cardiac compression and clinical prognosis of esophageal tumors: a retrospective study

BackgroundThe J wave syndromes (JWS) could be observed in patients with mediastinal tumors, though few studies have verified the statistical correlation between J waves and cardiac compression by tumors. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between J waves and cardiac compression by esophageal tumor and to compare the prediction of J waves on clinical prognosis with that of cardiac compression by esophageal tumor.MethodsWe enrolled 273 patients (228 males, 45 females; mean 63.8±7.5 years) with esophageal tumors admitted to Shanghai Chest Hospital between August 2016 and November 2020. The J wave was defined as a J-point elevation of ≥0.1 mV in a 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) and classified into multiple types. Chest computed tomography (CT) was reviewed to clarify the anatomical relationship between the heart and the esophageal tumor. The prognosis of severe cardiac events and survival status were followed up through medical history, examination records and telephone records.ResultsJ waves were present in 141 patients among all 273 cases. The sensitivity and specificity of cardiac compression by the tumor for J waves were 78.1% and 67.3%, respectively. The odds ratio (OR) of cardiac compression by the tumor to J waves was 7.33 [95% confidence interval (CI): 4.21–12.74; P<0.001]. The Kappa coefficient between J waves and cardiac compression was 0.44±0.05. The significance association between J waves and cardiac compression was independent from other clinical variables (P<0.001). Decreased J wave amplitude was correlated with the disappearance of cardiac compression during follow-up (P=0.03). Patients with J waves had a higher risk of severe cardiac events than those without J waves (OR =2.84, 95% CI: 1.22–6.63; P=0.01). During the follow-up period, we found that the presence of J waves [hazard ratio (HR) =2.28; 95% CI: 1.35–3.84; P=0.002] and cardiac compression by the tumor (HR =2.51; 95% CI: 1.51–4.17; P<0.001) were both negatively correlated with the survival time of patients.ConclusionsThe presence of J waves could be used as an effective mean to predict the mechanical impact of esophageal tumor on the heart, and played an important role in predicting the survival of patients.     

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in older adults with melanoma or cutaneous malignancies: The Wilmot Cancer Institute experience

ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to explore the associations between age and frailty with immune-related adverse events (irAEs) among patients with cutaneous malignancies receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy.MethodsA retrospective review of all patients receiving ipilimumab, nivolumab, or pembrolizumab for treatment of cutaneous malignancies at the Wilmot Cancer Institute between 1 Jan 2011 and 3 Apr 2017.ResultsA total of 120 patients (age <70 N = 68, age ≥70 N = 52; range, 26–93) were identified. 44.1%[95%CI:32–57%] of patients age <70 and 31.4%[95%CI:19–46%] of patients age ≥70 experienced ≥1 irAE on 1st line ICI therapy (P = 0.158). A total of 3 adults died of irAEs (2 age ≥70; 1 age <70). Patients ≥70 were more frequently treated with anti-PD-1 monotherapy than dual checkpoint blockade or ipilimumab (P < 0.01) in the first line setting. Among patients on first line anti-PD-1 monotherapy for cutaneous melanoma, 21 were age <70 and 20 were age ≥70, with similar observed rates of irAEs (52.4%[95%CI 29.8–74.3] and 63.2%[95%CI 38.4–83.7]). Indirect frailty markers in patients age ≥70 such as having fallen in the prior six months, ECOG PS ≥2 or Charlson comorbidity scores ≥11 experienced similar rates of response and toxicity. Among 9 patients with a PS = 3, 8 died, 6 due to progressive disease. No deaths due to irAEs occurred in this frail subgroup.ConclusionAnti-PD-1 monotherapy for older adults with cutaneous malignancies have similar response and irAE rates when compared to those of younger patients. Deaths from disease progression were more frequent than those from toxicity in both age subgroups.     

Impact of incomplete surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy for the intraoperative rupture of capsulated stage I epithelial ovarian cancer: a multi-institutional study with an in-depth subgroup analysis

ObjectiveThe aim of the present study was to examine the effects of incomplete surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy on the prognosis of patients with intraoperative rupture of capsulated stage I epithelial ovarian cancer (OvCa).MethodsA regional retrospective study was conducted between 1986 and 2019. Among 4,730 patients with malignant ovarian tumors, 534 women with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IA and IC1 epithelial OvCa were eligible. Differences in survival outcomes were examined between patients with stage IA and IC1 tumors and the effects of uterine preservation, complete-staging lymphadenectomy, and adjuvant chemotherapy were investigated by an in-depth subgroup analysis. To analyze therapeutic effects, baseline imbalances were adjusted using propensity score (PS).ResultsThe prognosis of patients with stage IC1 tumors was worse than those with stage IA. Surgical spill did not affect the site of recurrence. In the PS-adjusted subgroup analysis, uterine preservation (hazard ratio [HR]=1.669; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.052–2.744), incomplete-staging lymphadenectomy (HR=1.689; 95% CI=1.211–2.355), and the omission of adjuvant chemotherapy (HR=3.729; 95% CI=2.090–6.653) significantly increased the HR of recurrence for patients with stage IC1 tumors compared to those with stage IA tumors. Adjuvant chemotherapy decreased the impact of rupture with uterine preservation (HR=0.159; 95% CI=0.230–1.168) or incomplete-staging lymphadenectomy (HR=0.987; 95% CI=0.638–1.527).ConclusionThe present results suggest intraoperative rupture of capsulated stage I epithelial OvCa is associated with a poor prognosis. When chemotherapy is given for patients receiving incomplete surgery, there is no longer an increased risk of recurrence observed with the rupture.     

Comparison of treatment outcomes of surgery and radiotherapy,including concurrent chemoradiotherapy for stage Ib2-IIb cervical adenocarcinoma patients: a retrospective study

ObjectiveThe study compared the treatment outcomes of surgery versus radiotherapy, including concurrent chemoradiotherapy, in stage Ib2–IIb cervical adenocarcinoma patients in Japan.MethodsOf 57,470 patients diagnosed with stage I–IV cervical cancer from January 2001–December 2011, 1,932 patients with stage Ib2–IIb cervical adenocarcinoma were initially treated by surgery or radiotherapy. The primary endpoint was 5-year overall survival (OS) in all and 614 propensity score-matched (PSM) patients (307 per group). We compared OS and prognosis factors based on age, primary stage, and treatment arm.ResultsIn Japan, >80% (n=1,573) of stage Ib2–IIb cervical adenocarcinoma patients underwent surgery. The 5-year OS of surgery vs. radiotherapy groups were 82.1% (n=704) vs. 79.7% (n=59) (hazard ratio [HR]=1.494; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.826–2.702; p=0.181) for stage Ib2, 76.6% (n=239) vs. 66.7% (n=54) (HR=1.679; 95% CI=0.986–2.858; p=0.053) for stage IIa, and 71.1% (n=630) vs. 58.9% (n=246) (HR=1.711; 95% CI=1.341–2.184; p<0.001) for stage IIb. In 614 PSM patients balanced for age and carcinoma stage Ib2–IIb, the 5-year OS of surgery vs. radiation groups was 73.0% (n=307) vs. 65.5% (n=307) (HR=1.394; 95% CI=1.044–1.860; p=0.023).In multivariable analysis, age (HR=1.293; 95% CI=1.045–1.601; p=0.018), treatment arm, radiotherapy (HR=1.556; 95% CI=1.253–1.933; p<0.001), and stage IIb (HR=1.783; 95% CI=1.443–2.203; p=0.018) were independent prognosis factors for 5-year OS in stage Ib2–IIb adenocarcinoma patients.ConclusionAge (>65 years), treatment arm (radiotherapy), and stage IIb significantly affect OS in cervical adenocarcinoma patients. Surgery may be considered for <65-year-old patients with stage IIb adenocarcinoma.     

Impact of timing of adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer: the Royal Marsden Hospital experience

Background The optimal time to deliver adjuvant chemotherapy has not been defined.Methods A retrospective study of consecutive patients receiving adjuvant anthracycline and/or taxane 1993–2010. Primary endpoint included 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) in patients commencing chemotherapy <31 versus ≥31 days after surgery. Secondary endpoints included 5-year overall survival (OS) and sub-group analysis by receptor status.Results We identified 2003 eligible patients: 1102 commenced chemotherapy <31 days and 901 ≥31 days after surgery. After a median follow-up of 115 months, there was no difference in 5-year DFS rate with chemotherapy <31 compared to ≥31 days after surgery in the overall population (81 versus 82% hazard ratio (HR) 1.15, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.92–1.43, p = 0.230). The 5-year OS rate was similar in patients who received chemotherapy <31 or ≥31 days after surgery (90 versus 91%, (HR 1.21, 95% CI 0.89–1.64, p = 0.228). For 250 patients with triple-negative breast cancer OS was significantly worse in patients who received chemotherapy ≥31 versus <31 days (HR = 2.18, 95% CI 1.11–4.30, p = 0.02).Discussion Although adjuvant chemotherapy ≥31 days after surgery did not affect DFS or OS in the whole study population, in TN patients, chemotherapy ≥31 days after surgery significantly reduced 5-year OS; therefore, delays beyond 30 days in this sub-group should be avoided.Subject terms: Chemotherapy, Breast cancer