Psychiatric and Behavioural Disorders in Children with Epilepsy (ILAE Task Force Report): Adverse cognitive and behavioural effects of antiepileptic drugs in children

The literature was evaluated for cognitive and more general behavioural effects. We distinguished the older antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), from the newer and newest AEDs. The striking finding was the lack of information on children. From the available evidence it would appear that there may be negative cognitive effects with phenobarbital, phenytoin, topiramate and zonisamide, and adverse behavioural effects with phenobarbital, valproate, gabapentin, topiramate, levetiracetam and zonisamide. There is inconclusive data on ethosuximide, clobazam, vigabatrin, felbamate, pregabalin, stiripentol, rufinamide, lacosamide and retigabine. The following drugs appear to be neutral with regard to cognitive effects: valproate, carbamazepine, gabapentin and oxcarbazepine. Carbamazepine appears to be neutral with regard to behavioural effects. Positive cognitive effects have been reported with lamotrigine and levetiracetam. Positive behavioural effects have been reported with lamotrigine. Recommendations are provided.     

Inappropriate use of carbamazepine and vigabatrin in typical absence seizures

Carbamazepine and vigabatrin are contraindicated in typical absence seizures. Of 18 consecutive referrals of children with resistant typical absences only, eight were erroneously treated with carbamazepine either as monotherapy or as an add-on. Vigabatrin was also used in the treatment of two children. Frequency of absences increased in four children treated with carbamazepine and two of these developed myoclonic jerks, which resolved on withdrawal of carbamazepine. Absences were aggravated in both cases where vigabatrin was added on to concurrent treatment. Optimal control of the absences was achieved with sodium valproate, lamotrigine, or ethosuximide alone or in combination.     

Therapie von Epilepsien im Kindes- und Jugendalter

Therapeutic strategies for treating epilepsy in childhood and adolescence markedly depend on the underlying electroclinical syndromes. In self-limiting epilepsies with focal seizures of genetic or unknown etiology, e.g. benign infantile seizures, rolandic epilepsy and Panayiotopoulos syndrome, a considerable number of patients may not require any pharmacological therapy but if they do, sulthiame, levetiracetam or oxcarbazepine should easily control seizures. Early application of corticosteroids should be considered in atypical forms, such as pseudo-Lennox syndrome, syndrome of continuous spike waves in sleep (CSWS) and Landau-Kleffner syndrome. Lamotrigine, slow release oxcarbazepine and levetiracetam are drugs of first choice for treating focal seizures in epilepsy of structural/metabolic or unknown causes. Various antiepileptic drugs are available in case of difficulties in controlling seizures; however, the possibility of epilepsy surgery should be evaluated early in these cases. Ethosuximide is the first line drug in childhood absence while valproate is the most effective drug in juvenile absence epilepsy and juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. Because of the lower teratogenic risk an initial trial with lamotrigine, possibly combined with levetiracetam is justified in girls. Valproate, lamotrigine and ethosuximide are the most important options in myoclonic atonic epilepsy. In addition, a ketogenic diet is a promising option. While corticosteroids and vigabatrin should be administered for infantile spasms, valproate is the basis for different combinations in the treatment of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Efficacy of lamotrigine, topiramate, rufinamide, clobazam and felbamate has been shown in placebo-controlled randomized trials. Vagus nerve stimulation and ketogenic diets are further options. In cases of Dravet syndrome early treatment with either bromide or valproate in combination with clobazam and stiripentol should be established. Combinations of valproate, topiramate and bromide and ketogenic can be effective. In general, the increasing number of available anticonvulsants allows an individually optimized therapeutic strategy in many cases, considering gender, age, body weight, behavior and cognition. Maintaining the best possible development should always be a major issue in the treatment of childhood epilepsy.     

Drug selection for the newly diagnosed patient: When is a new generation antiepileptic drug indicated?

Abstract. Treatment options in epilepsy have increased dramatically since the early 1990s with the introduction of nine new generation antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) (felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin and zonisamide). This makes drug selection much more complicated and challenging. This review discusses drug selection in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy and in particular the role of new AEDs in this population. The choice of treatment should always be based on a careful comparison of the risk-benefit ratio for the different treatment options and the outcome of such evaluation may be different in patients with new onset compared with chronic epilepsy. Efficacy, tolerability and safety are the main criteria for selection of AEDs and any first line drug for patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy must have demonstrated satisfactory efficacy as monotherapy in that patient population. So far, of the new AEDs only lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine and topiramate have documentation sufficient to be granted licence for use as monotherapy in most European countries. Because the new generation AEDs have failed to demonstrate improved effectiveness as monotherapy, old generation AEDs such as carbamazepine and valproate remain drugs of first choice for partial and generalised seizures, respectively. However, there are special situations and populations where a new AED may be a reasonable first line drug. These include vigabatrin in West syndrome associated with tuberous sclerosis, lamotrigine as alternative to valproate in idiopathic generalised seizures in women of childbearing potential and lamotrigine for the treatment of epilepsy in the elderly population. The role of the new generation AEDs is likely to become more prominent as more experience is gained.     

Oxcarbazepine in the treatment of epilepsy in children and adolescents with intellectual disability

Oxcarbazepine is similar to carbamazepine in its mechanisms of action and antiepileptic efficacy, but has better tolerability and fewer interactions with other drugs. Very few data are available on the usefulness of oxcarbazepine in patients with intellectual disability and epilepsy. From January 1991 until October 1994, the present authors treated 40 patients with intellectual disability and epilepsy under the age of 18 years with oxcarbazepine. The mean age at onset of epilepsy was 12 months (range = 0-132 months). All patients had previously been intractable to antiepileptic drugs (including carbamazepine in 29 patients). The age at onset of oxcarbazepine therapy ranged from 0.8 to 17.1 years (mean = 6.2 years). Thirty-one patients (78%) received other antiepileptic drugs simultaneously with oxcarbazepine. The mean follow-up with oxcarbazepine treatment was 18.8 months. The mean maximum oxcarbazepine dose was 49 mg kg(-1) day(-1) (range = 21-86 mg kg(-1) day(-1). A reduction in seizures of at least 50% during oxcarbazepine treatment was observed in 14 out of 28 (50%) patients with localization-related epilepsy and in 5 out of 12 (42%) patients with generalized epilepsy. Efficacy was transient in three patients. An increase of atypical absences was observed in one child and an emergence of drop attacks in another. Side-effects were observed in 16 (40%) patients; in eight (20%), these lead to dose reduction or discontinuation. Oxcarbazepine appears to be an effective and well-tolerated drug for children and adolescents with intellectual disability and epilepsy.     

Antiepileptic drugs and visual function

Antiepileptic drugs are known to result in visual disturbances. A number of antiepileptic drugs have recently been reported to result in various abnormalities of vision, particularly deficiencies in visual fields and color vision. Moreover, there has been a marked improvement in the diagnosis and understanding of the pathophysiology of visual disturbance. This review collects evidence for visual adverse effects induced by the older antiepileptic drugs (barbiturates, benzodiazepine, carbamazepine, valproic acid, ethosuximide, and phenytoin) and the newer ones (vigabatrin, topiramate, tiagabine, levetiracetam, lamotrigine, gabapentin, felbamate, and oxcarbazepine).     

Effect of antiepileptic drug polytherapy on crystalluria

Urolithiasis is a rare side effect of antiepileptic drugs. To clarify the risk factors for urolithiasis induced by antiepileptic drugs, the effect of antiepileptic drug monotherapy on crystalluria was studied, and zonisamide or sulthiame therapy and alkaline urine were demonstrated to be risk factors. In the next investigation, the effect of antiepileptic drug polytherapy on crystalluria was retrospectively studied in epilepsy patients treated for more than 1 month during the last 7 years. A total of 278 urine specimens from epilepsy patients aged between 7 months and 36 years were enrolled in this study. The mean age was 12.3 years. There were 109 samples from females and 169 from males. Antiepileptic drugs administered in this study were valproate (174 urinary samples), zonisamide (139), carbamazepine (138), phenobarbital (65), phenytoin (52), acetazolamide (17), clonazepam (15), sulthiame (6), ethosuximide (6), nitrazepam (4), and clobazam (4). Epilepsy patients treated with antiepileptic drug polytherapy were frequently found to have crystalluria in patients demonstrating alkaline urine and taking acetazolamide, zonisamide (particularly with high serum levels), or many antiepileptic drugs in combination. Regular urinalysis seems to be necessary in these patients, and the evaluation for urolithiasis should be performed if persistent crystalluria is demonstrated.     

Efficacy and tolerability of conversion to monotherapy with lamotrigine compared with valproate and carbamazepine in patients with epilepsy

OBJECTIVE: This randomized, open-label study was designed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of lamotrigine monotherapy with those of valproate and carbamazepine monotherapy in patients with epilepsy whose seizures were uncontrolled on their prestudy antiepileptic drug monotherapy. METHODS: Patients meeting eligibility criteria were randomized 2:1 to lamotrigine:carbamazepine or lamotrigine:valproate. The treatment phase was divided into a 4-week dose-escalation phase (Weeks 1-4), during which lamotrigine, carbamazepine, or valproate was added to patient's prestudy monotherapy; an 8-week add-on phase (Weeks 5-12), during which patients were stabilized on both the study medication and their prestudy antiepileptic therapy; an 8-week withdrawal phase (Weeks 13-20), during which prestudy antiepileptic therapy could be withdrawn if clinically appropriate; and an 8-week monotherapy phase (Weeks 21-28), during which patients could be treated with study medication as monotherapy. RESULTS: The numbers of patients randomized to the carbamazepine and valproate arms of the study were 144 (98 lamotrigine, 46 carbamazepine) and 158 (105 lamotrigine, 53 valproate), respectively. Successful monotherapy sustained for at least 7 weeks was achieved in comparable percentages of patients in the lamotrigine group (56%) and the carbamazepine group (54%) and in more patients in the lamotrigine group (49%) than the valproate group (40%). Among monotherapy completers, the percentage of patients with zero seizures during the monotherapy phase was comparable for lamotrigine (41%) and carbamazepine (30%) and significantly higher (P<0.05) with lamotrigine (32%) than with valproate (11%). No differences between treatments were observed with respect to time to treatment failure or time to first seizure. Lamotrigine was also better tolerated than carbamazepine or valproate. CONCLUSION: Lamotrigine monotherapy was as effective as and better tolerated than carbamazepine or valproate monotherapy in patients whose seizures were uncontrolled on their prestudy antiepileptic drug monotherapy.     

Effect of antiepileptic drug comedication on lamotrigine clearance

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of antiepileptic drug (AED) comedication, including all newer AEDs, on lamotrigine clearance (CL). DESIGN: We reviewed 570 medical charts of outpatients 12 years and older seen at the Columbia Comprehensive Epilepsy Center who received lamotrigine as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy. We investigated whether a given comedication contributed to the lamotrigine serum concentration. In addition, we examined whether the mean lamotrigine CL during comedication with each AED differed from the lamotrigine CL during monotherapy. Finally, we examined whether individuals had significantly different lamotrigine CLs when taking or not taking a particular comedication. RESULTS: Comedication with phenytoin, carbamazepine, and valproate sodium were the major AED predictors of lamotrigine serum concentration. Comedication regimens with felbamate, oxcarbazepine, and phenobarbital were small but significant predictors. The mean lamotrigine CL was 43.2 mL/h per kilogram of body weight with lamotrigine monotherapy, significantly higher with comedication with phenytoin (101.3 mL/h per kilogram) and carbamazepine (59.5 mL/h per kilogram) and significantly lower with valproate (16.9 mL/h per kilogram). Patients had significantly higher lamotrigine CL when taking phenytoin, carbamazepine, and phenobarbital than when not taking those comedications and had significantly lower lamotrigine CL when taking valproate. The mean lamotrigine CL was significantly lower than that associated with monotherapy in patients comedicated with valproate plus phenytoin (22.0 mL/h per kilogram) but not in patients comedicated with valproate plus carbamazepine (33.3 mL/h per kilogram). No other AEDs affected lamotrigine CL. CONCLUSION: Phenytoin increases lamotrigine CL by approximately 125%, carbamazepine increases lamotrigine CL by approximately 30% to 50%, and valproate decreases lamotrigine CL by approximately 60%. No newer AED, with the possible exception of oxcarbazepine, has a major impact on lamotrigine CL.     

Effects of antiepileptic drugs on refractory seizures in the intact immature corticohippocampal formation in vitro

PURPOSE: We developed a new in vitro preparation of immature rats, in which intact corticohippocampal formations (CHFs) depleted in magnesium ions become progressively epileptic. The better to characterize this model, we examined the effects of 14 antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) currently used in clinical practice. METHODS: Recurrent ictal-like seizures (ILEs, four per hour) were generated in intact CHFs of P7-8 rats, and extracellular recordings were performed in the hippocampus and neocortex. AEDs were applied at clinically relevant concentrations (at least two), during 30 min after the third ILE. Their ability to prevent or to delay the next ILE was examined. RESULTS: Valproic acid and benzodiazepines (clobazam and midazolam) but also phenobarbital and levetiracetam prevent the occurrence of seizures. In contrast, usual concentrations of carbamazepine (CBZ), phenytoin, vigabatrin, tiagabine, gabapentin, lamotrigine (LTG), topiramate, felbamate, and ethosuximide did not suppress ILEs. In addition, LTG and CBZ aggravate seizures in one third of the cases. CONCLUSIONS: This intact in vitro preparation in immature animals appears to be quite resistant to most AEDs. Blockade of seizures was achieved with drugs acting mainly at the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)A-receptor site but not with those that increase the amount of GABA. Drugs with a broad spectrum of activity are efficient but not those preferentially used in partial seizures or absences. We suggest that this preparation may correspond to a model of epilepsy with generalized convulsive seizures and could be helpful to develop new AEDs for refractory infantile epilepsies.     

Pharmacodynamic interaction studies with topiramate in the pentylenetetrazol and maximal electroshock seizure models.

There is emerging evidence to support the efficacy of some antiepileptic drug (AED) combinations in refractory epilepsy. Definitive clinical studies are, however, difficult to perform. Experimental seizure models can be employed to identify potentially useful combinations for subsequent clinical evaluation. We have investigated the anticonvulsant effects of topiramate (TPM) in combination with 13 other AEDs in the pentylenetetrazol (PTZ) and maximal electroshock (MES) seizure models. Single drugs and combinations were administered by intraperitoneal injection and anticonvulsant effects determined at 1-hour post-dosing. TPM was without significant effect in the PTZ test. In contrast, phenobarbital, primidone, ethosuximide, sodium valproate, felbamate and tiagabine all increased the latency to the first generalised seizure. Combinations of TPM and active adjunctive drug were universally effective. Combinations of TPM with clobazam, lamotrigine and levetiracetam were also anticonvulsant, despite the inactivity of the constituent compounds when administered alone. TPM reduced the incidence of MES-induced seizures in a dose-dependent manner, as did phenobarbital, phenytoin, primidone, carbamazepine, sodium valproate, clobazam, lamotrigine, felbamate and tiagabine. All combination treatments were similarly effective. These findings suggest that combinations of TPM with lamotrigine and levetiracetam may demonstrate anticonvulsant synergism and merit further investigation in additional model systems and with recourse to more quantitative mathematical analysis.     

Seizure-inducing effects of antiepileptic drugs: a review

Seizure-inducing effects can be observed in the treatment of epileptic patients with antiepileptic drugs (AED). This may be a paradoxical reaction (for example the increase of complex focal seizures due to carbamazepine, vigabatrin or phenytoin treatment) or a result of AED-induced encephalopathy (commonly induced by valproate in patients with complex focal seizures). A seizure increase during intoxication with AEDs is a rare phenomenon, thus, it is not directly related to this condition. An incorrect choice of drugs in the treatment of an epileptic syndrome or seizure type may provoke seizures (as for example the provocation of absences due to carbamazepine or phenytoin). The possible seizure-inducing effect of AEDs has to be differentiated from seizure occurrence due to the natural course of epilepsy. This may be especially difficult in patients suffering from West syndrome or Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, in whom seizure frequency may vary even without medication. However, especially in these patients, drug-induced worsening of seizure manifestation is often observed. In general, a seizure-inducing effect of antiepileptic drugs has to be considered when a seizure increase is observed soon after the initiation of therapy, when a stepwise increase of the dosage is followed by a further increase of seizures, a decrease of seizures is seen with tapering of the dosage and a renewed increase of seizures can be observed after this therapy has been reestablished. Finally, one knows that the clinical condition of encephalopathy due to valproate or carbamazepine is accompanied by seizure increase. In spite of these clinical aspects, the underlying mechanisms of seizure increase mostly remain unclear. From animal experiments it is obvious that especially carbamazepine and phenytoin may provoke generalized seizures as absences or myoclonic seizures. A seizure increase during vigabatrin therapy has been attributed to the increase of the cerebral amount of gamma-amino-butyric acid, which is known to possibly exhibit inhibitory or excitatory neuronal effects. The occurrence of tonic seizures in patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome has been attributed to the sedative effect of the drugs; however, this conclusion is controversial. From a clinical point of view, one should consider young age of the patient, mental retardation, antiepileptic polytherapy, high frequency of seizures or prominent epileptic activity in the electroencephalogram previous to medication as risk factors for a possible seizure-inducing effect of antiepileptic drugs.     

Selection of drugs for the treatment of epilepsy

Antiepileptic drug selection is based on efficacy for specific seizure types and epileptic syndromes. For idiopathic generalized epilepsies with absence, tonic-clonic, and myoclonic seizures, the drug of choice is valproate. Secondary generalized epilepsies with tonic, atonic, and other seizure types are difficult to treat with any single drug or combination of drugs. The drugs of choice for absence seizures are ethosuximide and valproate. For control of tonic-clonic seizures, any of the other major antiepileptic drugs can be effective. If valproate cannot be used, carbamazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin, or primidone is effective, but ethosuximide or a benzodiazepine needs to be added to control associated absence or myoclonic seizures. The drugs of first choice for partial epilepsies with partial and secondarily tonic-clonic seizures are carbamazepine and phenytoin. Increasing evidence suggests that valproate may be a third alternative. Phenobarbital and primidone are second choice selections because of side effects. A combination of two of these five major antiepileptic drugs may be necessary for inadequately controlled patients. Other epilepsy syndromes such as neonatal and infantile epilepsies, febrile epilepsy, and alcoholic epilepsy require specific drug treatment. For all these seizure types and epilepsy syndromes, treatment ultimately must be selected to provide maximal efficacy and minimal adverse effect for each individual patient.     

Bone mass and turnover in women with epilepsy on antiepileptic drug monotherapy

Antiepileptic drugs, particularly cytochrome P450 enzyme inducers, are associated with disorders of bone metabolism. We studied premenopausal women with epilepsy receiving antiepileptic drug monotherapy (phenytoin, carbamazepine, valproate, and lamotrigine). Subjects completed exercise and nutrition questionnaires and bone mineral density studies. Serum was analyzed for indices of bone metabolism including calcium, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, parathyroid hormone, insulin growth factor I, insulin binding protein III, and bone formation markers, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, and osteocalcin. Urine was analyzed for cross-linked N-telopeptide of type I collagen, a bone resorption marker. Calcium concentrations were significantly less in subjects receiving carbamazepine, phenytoin, and valproate than in those receiving lamotrigine (p = 0.008). Insulin growth factor-I was significantly reduced in subjects receiving phenytoin compared with those receiving lamotrigine (p = 0.017). Subjects receiving phenytoin had significantly greater levels of bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (p = 0.007). Our results demonstrate that phenytoin is associated with changes in bone metabolism and increased bone turnover. The lower calcium concentrations in subjects taking carbamazepine or valproate compared with those taking other antiepileptic drugs suggest that these antiepileptic drugs may have long-term effects. Subjects receiving lamotrigine had no significant reductions in calcium or increases in markers of bone turnover, suggesting this agent is less likely to have long-term adverse effects on bone.     

Lamotrigine monotherapy compared with carbamazepine, phenytoin, or valproate monotherapy in patients with epilepsy

OBJECTIVE: This open-label study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of lamotrigine monotherapy compared with monotherapy with conventional antiepileptic drugs in patients converting from previous monotherapy because of inadequate seizure control or unacceptable side effects. METHODS: This study was conducted in 26 neurology clinics and epilepsy centers throughout the United States. The study enrolled 115 patients with epilepsy converting from previous monotherapy because of inadequate seizure control or unacceptable side effects. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive 24 weeks of lamotrigine monotherapy or monotherapy with a conventional antiepileptic drug (carbamazepine, phenytoin, or valproate based on physician's choice). Patients were converted during an 相似文献   

Role of valproate across the ages. Treatment of epilepsy in children

In June 2005 a team of experts participated in a workshop with the objective of reaching agreement on the place of valproate use in the treatment of paediatric epilepsy patients. A general 'consensus of the meeting' was that the initiation of antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment should be based on a seizure-syndromic approach in children. Participants of the meeting also agreed that valproate is currently the AED with the broadest spectrum across all types of seizures and syndromes. Its superiority has been shown over almost 40 years of clinical experience. The best results are seen in idiopathic generalized epilepsy with or without photosensitivity, idiopathic focal and symptomatic generalized tonic–clonic seizures (GTCS). Evidence supports the use of valproate, ethosuximide and lamotrigine in absence epilepsies and the use of carbamazepine, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, phenytoin, topiramate, valproate and phenobarbital for primary GTCS. For new AEDs trials have been undertaken to define their therapeutic role but studies comparing their role to 'old' broad-spectrum drugs in specific syndromes are missing. Experts concluded that intravenous (i.v.) valproate is a useful agent in the treatment of non-convulsive status epilepticus (SE). There is an easy transition to oral treatment following i.v. valproate use. The discussion also concluded that, despite the lack of studies, valproate is an interesting, underutilized alternative in convulsive SE but more controlled studies are needed. The side effects of valproate use are well documented. Its effect on cognition and behaviour is more favourable than many of the other AEDs which is an important consideration in children. Overall, the clinical consensus of the meeting was that valproate's well established therapeutic properties far outweigh the negative side effects. Contraindication or withdrawal should be assessed individually.     

Antiepileptic drugs and the immune system

Data on the effects of antiepileptic drugs on the immune system are frequently inconsistent and sometimes conflicting because the effects of drugs cannot be separated from those of seizures, first-generation drugs have been most intensively investigated, the patient's genetic background, the mechanism of action and the pharmacokinetic profile of AEDs and the concurrent use of immunosuppressant drugs may act as confounders. Valproate, carbamazepine, phenytoin, vigabatrin, levetiracetam, and diazepam have been found to modulate the immune system activity by affecting humoral and cellular immunity. AEDs are associated with pharmacokinetic interactions (most frequently occurring with carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital and valproate). Hepatic metabolism is the primary site of interaction for both AEDs and immunotherapies (ACTH, dexamethasone, hydrocortisone, methylprednisolone, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, rituximab), which entail induction or inhibition of drug effects. However, the clinical importance of these drug interactions is still far from defined. An important adverse effect of the action of AEDs on the immune system is antiepileptic hypersensitivity syndrome (AHS), a life-threatening, idiosyncratic cutaneous reaction to aromatic AEDs resulting in end organ damage. Phenytoin, carbamazepine, phenobarbital, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, felbamate, and zonisamide have been implicated. The pathogenic mechanisms of AHS are incompletely understood.     

Low-dose phenobarbital for epilepsy with myoclonic absences: A case report

BackgroundEpilepsy with myoclonic absences (EMA) is a rare childhood-onset syndrome characterized by absences of responsiveness accompanied by bilateral rhythmic clonic-like myoclonic jerks. Herein, we describe the case of a child with EMA, resistant to multiple commonly used antiepileptic drugs, in whom low-dose phenobarbital unexpectedly achieved complete remission of epilepsy.Case reportA 10-year-old boy was referred to our hospital because of pharmaco-resistant frequent myoclonic absence seizures (MASs) and occasional generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCSs) that had commenced at the age of 7 years. Antiepileptic drugs including valproate sodium (VPA), levetiracetam, ethosuximide (ESM), clobazam, zonisamide, topiramate, clonazepam and lamotrigine were tested without significant effects. At the age of 8 years, phenobarbital was added to the VPA and ESM and increased to 1.2 mg/kg/day (blood concentration 8.6 µg/mL), which suppressed MASs completely within 1 month, and epileptic discharges on electroencephalography (EEG) within 5 months. To date, the boy has been seizure-free with normal EEG for 2 years.ConclusionPhenobarbital is a potential therapeutic option for pharmaco-resistant EMA.     

Opinion of Belgian neurologists on antiepileptic drug treatment in 2006: Belgian study on epilepsy treatment (BESET‐2)

Objectives – (i) To describe the medical treatment of epilepsy in Belgium in 2006, (ii) to detect the presence or absence of consensus in epilepsy treatment and (iii) to analyze the evolution of the neurologists’ opinion between 2003 and 2006. Materials and methods – In December 2006, 100 neurologists were interviewed with a structured questionnaire, based on ordinal four‐point scales. The questionnaire contained questions on treatment choices in adult patients with epilepsy. The results of this survey were compared with results of a previous one done in 2003. Results – Initial monotherapy was the preferred treatment strategy. Valproate was first choice in idiopathic generalized epilepsy. Carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine were first choice in focal epilepsy with partial seizures. Valproate was also first choice in focal epilepsy with secondarily generalized seizures. New antiepileptic drugs were recommended in second line. However, in special treatment situations, they were considered first‐line, e.g. lamotrigine in case of women in childbearing age. In comparison with 2003, there was a trend of using earlier the new antiepileptic drugs. Conclusions – In end 2006, carbamazepine, valproate and oxcarbazepine were considered to be first choice drugs, whereas other newer drugs, like lamotrigine, levetiracetam and topiramate were predominantly prescribed in second line.     

Effect of antiepileptic drugs on somatostatin release in vitro

In the present study we investigated the effect of antiepileptic drugs on high potassium (50 mM) stimulated somatostatin release in rat cortical slices in a superfusion system. The somatostatin-like immunoreactivity (SLI) in superfusate was determined by radioimmunoassay. The antiepileptic drugs studied, vigabatrin, valproate, carbamazepine, phenobarbital, primidone, clonazepam and phenytoin were tested at a concentration range of 1-1000 microM). Of the drugs used vigabatrin had the most significant inhibitory effect on SLI release (IC50 = 240 microM). Vigabatrin also caused a concomitant, dose-dependent increase in superfusate gamma-amino butyric acid (GABA) level. A 30% decrease in the release of SLI followed incubation with valproate and carbamazepine, but only at high drug concentrations (1000 microM). Phenobarbital, primidone, clonazepam and phenytoin did not affect SLI release. Addition of GABA to superfusate caused a dose-dependent decrease in the amount of SLI release (IC50 = 56 microM). In conclusion, at low concentrations the antiepileptic drugs had only minor effects on SLI release. At higher concentrations, however, vigabatrin and valproate decreased the release of SLI, which may relate to their ability to elevate tissue levels of GABA.