Evidence-based medicine and vesicoureteral reflux

Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) remains one of the most controversial subjects in paediatric urology. Much literature has been published on VUR, making the understanding of this anomaly and its treatments quite opaque. Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) should be helpful to clarify the various VUR approaches contained in the 6224 titles found on Medline using the keywords "vesicoureteral reflux" and "vesicoureteric reflux". These articles were critically reviewed and graded according to EBM scorings, with regard to their methodological designs. This review of VUR literature suggests that most of our knowledge is based on publications with a low level of evidence, and that EBM lacks arguments to support recommendations for VUR diagnostic and treatment. It appears yet that antenatal dilatation of the urinary tract and symptomatic urinary tract infections (UTI) justify VUR screening. Surgery should be discussed in recurrent UTIs or deterioration of renal function. There is no consensus in case of persistent asymptomatic VUR regarding indication and duration of antibio-prophylaxis, and selection of radical treatment.     

Primärer vesikoureteraler Reflux

The never ending discussion about the diagnostics and treatment of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) now includes arguments for diagnostic nihilism as well as invasive diagnostics and therapy, which is reminiscent of the debate on prostate cancer in adulthood. The common goal of all currently competing diagnostic strategies and approaches is the prevention of renal scars by the most effective and least burdensome approach. There is a difference between acquired pyelonephritic scars with VUR (acquired reflux nephropathy) and congenital reflux nephropathy (primary dysplasia) which cannot be influenced by any therapy. The VUR can be verified by conventional radiological voiding cystourethrography (VCUG), by urosonography, radionuclide cystography or even by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The guidelines of the European Association of Urology/European Society for Paediatric Urology (EAU/ESPU) recommend radiological screening for VUR after the first febrile urinary tract infection. Significant risk factors in patients with VUR are recurrent urinary tract infections (UTI) and parenchymal scarring and the patients should undergo patient and risk-adapted therapy. Infants with dilating reflux have a higher risk of renal scarring than those without dilatation of the renal pelvis. Bladder dysfunction or dysfunctional elimination syndrome represents a well-known but previously neglected risk factor in combination with VUR and should be treated prior to any surgical intervention as far as is possible. Certainly not every patient with VUR needs therapy. The current treatment strategies take into account age and gender, the presence of dysplastic or pyelonephritic renal scars, the clinical symptoms, bladder dysfunction and frequency and severity of recurrent UTI as criteria for the therapy decision. The use of an antibacterial prophylaxis as well as the duration is controversially discussed. Endoscopic therapy can be a good alternative to antibacterial prophylaxis or a surveillance strategy in patients with low grade VUR. In patients with dilating VUR and given indications for surgery, endoscopic treatment can be offered. However, parents should be completely informed about the significantly lower success rate of endoscopic therapy compared to open surgical procedures. The open surgical techniques guarantee the highest success rates and should be used in patients with a dilating VUR and high risk of renal damage.     

膀胱输尿管反流的精准诊治进展

膀胱输尿管反流( VUR)是儿童最为常见的泌尿系统疾病,该病使患儿更易出现肾盂肾炎,是儿童尿路感染后肾脏疤痕形成的最重要的风险因素。到目前为止,对VUR的诊断及治疗仍有很多争议,其争议内容主要是围绕着哪些儿童应该评估反流的有无,以及一旦确诊VUR时哪些儿童又应该接受治疗及接受何种治疗。VUR是一种遗传性疾病,但是该病具有种族差异性、遗传异质性等特点,迄今为止国际上尚没有公认的、一致的主要致病基因。明确不同基因突变所致的VUR的研究,有助于做出肾疤痕形成是先天性还是后天性的判断,从而在临床做出精确诊断及精准治疗。     

Management of vesicoureteral reflux in children

Background. Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in children has been reported in many studies. However, the management of VUR is still controversial. Methods. One hundred and fourteen children with primary VUR were divided into two treatment groups: medical (group A) and surgical (group B). The clinical courses and X-ray films of cystography and intravenous pyelography of these children were reviewed retrospectively, using the International Reflux Study Committee Classification. Results. In children less than 1 year of age, VUR was observed more frequently in boys. However, this ratio was reversed in children aged 2 years or more. Sixty-three percent of all refluxing ureters had reflux of grade III or higher at the initial examination. Spontaneous cessation of VUR was observed in 17% of group A ureters, and all had grade III or less reflux. Renal parenchymal scars were already present at the initial examination in 23% of kidneys with refluxing ureters. Recurrent urinary tract infections became less frequent after anti-reflux surgery. The progression of renal scars and renal growth retardation was observed more frequently in group B children. Conclusions. From these observations, it appeared that surgical management of VUR did not prevent the progression of renal scarring or renal growth retardation. Early detection of and intervention in VUR may prevent the progression of renal scarring and renal growth retardation. However, a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled study would be necessary to confirm these findings. Received: October 4, 1999 / Accepted: January 15, 2000     

Vesicoureteral reflux

Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR), the retrograde flow of urine from the bladder toward the kidney, is common in young children. About 30% of children with urinary tract infections will be diagnosed with VUR after a voiding cystourethrogram. For most, VUR will resolve spontaneously; 20% to 30% will have further infections, but few will experience long-term renal sequelae. Developmentally, VUR arises from disruption of complex signaling pathways and cellular differentiation. These mechanisms are probably genetically programmed but may be influenced by environmental exposures. Phenotypic expression of VUR is variable, ranging from asymptomatic forms to severe renal parenchymal disease and end-stage disease. VUR is often familial but is genetically heterogeneous with variability in mode of inheritance and in which gene, or the number of genes, that are involved. Numerous genetic studies that explore associations with VUR are available. The relative utility of these for understanding the genetics of VUR is often limited because of small sample size, poor methodology, and a diverse spectrum of patients. Much, if not all, of the renal parenchymal damage associated with end-stage disease is likely to be congenital, which limits the opportunity for intervention to familial cases where risk prediction may be available. Management of children with VUR remains controversial because there is no strong supportive evidence that prophylactic antibiotics or surgical intervention improve outcomes. Furthermore, well-designed genetic epidemiological studies focusing on the severe end of the VUR phenotype may help define the causal pathway and identify modifiable or disease predictive factors.     

Urinary tract infection: one lingering effect of childhood kidney diseases--review of the literature

Urinary tract infection (UTI) is a possible warning sign of the presence of anomalies of the urinary tract. Following a UTI there is concern with recurrences which can contribute to scarring which may lead to hypertension, pregnancy-induced hypertension and even renal failure in later years. Prospective studies using 99mTc-labeled dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) have shown that 30%-40% of children will have renal scarring after febrile UTI, regardless of the presence or absence of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). Many studies have demonstrated that VUR is an important risk factor for renal scarring after UTI. Hypertension affects at least 10% of children with renal scarring, and in adults with reflux nephropathy (RN), the prevalence of hypertension is also much higher (38%-50%). UTI, pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH) or renal function deterioration alone or in some combination has been reported to be as high as 39% in women with renal scarring. RN is one of the important causes of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) worldwide. Prevention of renal scar development should reduce the incidence of hypertension in patients as they age. The appropriate management of childhood UTI includes education of parents, patients and general physicians to be sure that everyone is aware of not only the current condition, but also the possibility of future UTI-related situations. In conclusion: UTI itself is a warning sign of possible anomalies of the urinary tract, renal problems and/or chronic renal complications. Although VUR is primarily a disease of childhood, scarring from the disease can cause problems in later years, with the complicating factor that because only the renal scar remains, the VUR may be forgotten and not considered when diagnosing the current problem.     

The role of imaging in urinary tract infections

The aim of imaging in urinary tract infections (UTI) is to detect conditions that must be corrected to avoid imminent deterioration of kidney function, or to prevent recurrent infections and long-term kidney damage. The most threatening conditions are obstruction of an infected upper tract and abscesses of the genitourinary system. An image-guided percutaneous drainage can be lifesaving. The role of imaging in small children with UTI is controversial in terms of the importance of anatomical and functional disorders in relation to the preventive measures to be taken. In newborns identified with hydronephrosis during pregnancy or by neonatal screening, vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) and renal scarring are congenital and not caused by infection. Most of these patients are males and the VUR is of a higher grade than VUR detected in girls after the first UTI. Imaging in children with UTI should only be ordered after a thorough evaluation of the risk of renal damage and the benefits of preventive measures. In adult females, no imaging is necessary in cystitis, while ultrasonography and plain films are recommended in acute pyelonephritis. Since uncomplicated UTI in men is rare, diagnostic imaging should be started early to rule out complicating factors in the urinary tract. In prostatitis, vesiculitis, epididymitis and orchitis the role of imaging is to rule out abscess formation and testicular malignancies.     

Vesicoureteral reflux, a benign condition

The combination of urinary tract infection (UTI) and vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is commonly thought to predispose the child to pyelonephritis, renal scarring and, later in life, to hypertension or end-stage renal disease (ESRD). This paradigm has led to the active search, follow-up and treatment of VUR, and also prevention of recurrent UTI in children. The causality of VUR and ESRD is controversial, however. According to recent meta-analyses it is uncertain whether we can prevent renal scarring or ESRD by treating VUR. Studies on VUR are abundant, but the findings and conclusions are confounding. Because of the lack of evidence of the role of VUR, reasonable doubt has recently been presented on the rationale of imaging all children with UTI and treating the children with VUR. The overall importance of VUR is confounded because of the natural tendency of VUR to resolve spontaneously, its dynamic nature, and its different grades in children. The historical studies showing that VUR is much more common, even among healthy children, than usually claimed, have been forgotten. Since it seems that we are referring too many healthy children to unpleasant and possibly unnecessary imaging tests for VUR, we are uncertain when and what kind of VUR—if any—we should treat, and whether our present rationale of addressing VUR truly makes any difference to renal scarring or ESRD in children, we should critically revisit the subject of VUR.     

Vesicoureteral reflux and reflux nephropathy

Primary vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is the commonest congenital urological abnormality in children, which has been associated with an increased risk of urinary tract infection (UTI) and renal scarring, also called reflux nephropathy (RN). In children, RN is diagnosed mostly after UTI (acquired RN) or during follow-up for antenatally diagnosed hydronephrosis with no prior UTI (congenital RN). The acquired RN is more common in female children, whereas the congenital RN is more common in male children. This observation in children might help explain the differences in the clinical presentation of RN in adults, with males presenting mostly with hypertension, proteinuria, and progressive renal failure as compared with females who present mostly with recurrent UTI and have a better outcome. Known risk factors for RN include the severity of VUR, recurrent UTI, and bladder-bowel dysfunction; younger age and delay in treatment of UTI are believed to be other risk factors. Management of VUR is controversial and includes antimicrobial prophylaxis, surgical intervention, or surveillance only. No evidence-based guidelines exist for appropriate follow-up of patients with RN.     

Meta-analysis of vesicoureteral reflux and urinary tract infection in children

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the efficacy of medical and surgical treatment of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in children by means of a meta-analysis, using the recurrence of urinary tract infections (UTIs), renal growth and renal scarring as endpoints. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a MEDLINE search for articles published in the English language between 1966 and 2002. Of 639 relevant articles found, 139 were chosen for a close review and the main database was supplemented with some additional articles derived from the references of these reviewed articles. Five studies were found acceptable for a meta-analysis. We reviewed all articles independently. All reviewers had to approve the accepted articles and data that were used in this meta-analysis. RESULTS: Operative treatment of VUR was better than medical treatment in terms of abolishing reflux (OR = 0.033; 95% CI 0.010-0.107). We found no statistically significant differences between surgically and medically treated patients in terms of kidney growth (OR = 2.46; 95% CI 0.74-8.16), scarring (OR = 1.05; 95% CI 0.71-1.55) or recurrence of UTIs (OR = 0.80; 95% CI 0.49-1.29). We could not evaluate possible differences in the parameters monitored between boys and girls because of a lack of data. CONCLUSIONS: Although surgical treatment of VUR is a common pediatric urologic procedure, the data relating to it are scanty. We found no clinically significant differences between surgical and medical treatment for VUR other than in the resolution of VUR itself. On the basis of present evidence we suggest that a child with UTI and significant VUR should be treated conservatively at first and that surgical treatment should be reserved for children who experience problems with antimicrobials or persistent clinically significant VUR after several years of follow-up.     

EAU Guidelines on vesicoureteral reflux in children

Context

Primary vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is a common congenital urinary tract abnormality in children. There is considerable controversy regarding its management. Preservation of kidney function is the main goal of treatment, which necessitates identification of patients requiring early intervention.

Objective

To present a management approach for VUR based on early risk assessment.

Evidence acquisition

A literature search was performed and the data reviewed. From selected papers, data were extracted and analyzed with a focus on risk stratification. The authors recognize that there are limited high-level data on which to base unequivocal recommendations, necessitating a revisiting of this topic in the years to come.

Evidence synthesis

There is no consensus on the optimal management of VUR or on its diagnostic procedures, treatment options, or most effective timing of treatment. By defining risk factors (family history, gender, laterality, age at presentation, presenting symptoms, VUR grade, duplication, and other voiding dysfunctions), early stratification should allow identification of patients at high potential risk of renal scarring and urinary tract infections (UTIs). Imaging is the basis for diagnosis and further management. Standard imaging tests comprise renal and bladder ultrasonography, voiding cystourethrography, and nuclear renal scanning. There is a well-documented link with lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD); patients with LUTD and febrile UTI are likely to present with VUR. Diagnosis can be confirmed through a video urodynamic study combined with a urodynamic investigation. Early screening of the siblings and offspring of reflux patients seems indicated.Conservative therapy includes watchful waiting, intermittent or continuous antibiotic prophylaxis, and bladder rehabilitation in patients with LUTD. The goal of the conservative approach is prevention of febrile UTI, since VUR will not damage the kidney when it is free of infection. Interventional therapies include injection of bulking agents and ureteral reimplantation. Reimplantation can be performed using a number of different surgical approaches, with a recent focus on minimally invasive techniques.

Conclusions

While it is important to avoid overtreatment, finding a balance between cases with clinically insignificant VUR and cases that require immediate intervention should be the guiding principle in the management of children presenting with VUR.     

Vesicoureteral reflux and urinary tract infections

Urinary tract infection is a common problem in children. The combination of vesico-ureteric reflux (VUR) and urinary tract infection may predispose children to pyelonephritis and subsequent complications. This review outlines the modifications suggested in the recent literature in the protocol for investigations and diagnosing VUR. Recent interest has been expressed in studying certain molecular markers to measure non-invasively renal damage in children with VUR. Long term results of comparative trials between medical and surgical management have been published recently.     

Vesicoureteral reflux: why we can't agree on its management! An evidence based approach

Vesicoureteral reflux remains one of the most controversial subjects in paediatric urology. The flooding of publications on reflux makes the understanding of this anomaly and its treatments quite opaque. Evidence Based Medicine might be a helpful tool to clarify the various approaches of reflux reflected in 6.715 publications found on Medline with the key-words "vesicoureteral reflux" and "vesicoureteric reflux". These articles were critically reviewed and graded according to EBM scorings, with regard to their methodological designs. It appears clearly after this review of literature concerning VUR that most of our beliefs are based on low evidence publications and that EBM has not sufficient arguments to establish recommendations for diagnostic and treatment of VUR. It appears yet that antenatal dilatation of the urinary tract and symptomatic UTIs justify looking for VUR. Surgery should be discussed in recurrent UTIs or deterioration of renal function. There is no consensus in the case of persistent asymptomatic VUR, indication and duration of antibioprophylaxis, and choice of radical treatment.     

Medical management of vesicoureteral reflux

Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in children is associated with increased risk of urinary tract infection (UTI). Recurrent UTI in the presence of the VUR is believed to cause renal scarring, which carries a risk of subsequent hypertension, toxemia of pregnancy, and significant renal damage, including end-stage renal disease. The natural history of VUR is to improve or resolve completely with time in most of the patients. The traditional management consists of prompt treatment of UTI, long-term anti-microbial prophylaxis until the VUR resolves, or surgical intervention in those with persistent high grade VUR, recurrent UTI in spite of prophylaxis with anti-microbial agent, allergy to anti-microbial agents, and patient/parent non-compliance with the medical management. Voiding dysfunction and constipation play an important role, and their diagnosis and appropriate management helps reduce the frequency of UTI and promote the resolution of the VUR. Patients with renal scarring need to be monitored for potential complications such as hypertension, proteinuria, and progression of the renal damage. In patients with hypertension and/or proteinuria, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) are the drugs of choice, because of their reno-protective properties. Recent studies have revealed that there is no convincing evidence that UTI in the presence of VUR predicts renal injury or that the use of long-term anti-microbial prophylaxis or surgical intervention prevents renal scarring or its progression. However, until proven otherwise by a prospective, placebo-controlled, randomized study, it is advisable to err on the side of caution and consider VUR and UTI risk factors for renal scarring and treat each patient on individual basis.     

Urinary diversion in infants with primary high-grade vesicoureteric reflux, urinary sepsis and renal function impairment

INTRODUCTION: General consensus on the optimal treatment of septic infants with primary high-grade vesicoureteric reflux (VUR) and renal function impairment has not been reached. Our study aims at evaluating the role of temporary urinary diversion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty male infants, affected by sepsis and primary high-grade VUR, underwent urinary diversion in 1996-2001 because of estimated risk of renal function deterioration, due to non-compliance with the antibiotic treatment. Plasmatic creatinine clearance, ultrasonography, micturition cystography and scintigraphy were evaluated. RESULTS: Creatinine clearance was abnormal in 13 infants on admission, in 10 after urinary diversion and in 6 after second surgery. Renal damage (focal or diffuse) was evident in 16 patients, without modifications after surgery. No patient developed urinary tract infections (UTI). Vesicostomy was done in 12 cases, ureterostomy in 8. Nephrectomy was performed in 3 cases with poor renal function, and ureteroneocystostomy in 17. CONCLUSIONS: Urinary diversion in septic infants with high-grade VUR can represent an alternative approach to the conservative or surgical treatment in selected patients presenting risk of renal function impairment. This procedure allowed an easy management of UTI without worsening of renal function while waiting for a better anatomical status to perform reconstructive surgery.     

Surgical management of vesicoureteral reflux in pediatric patients

Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) represents one of the most significant risk factors for acute pyelonephritis in children. The current indications for the surgical correction of VUR depend on the presence or absence of renal scars. If no scars are present, primary ureteral reimplantation is only indicated in high-grade bilateral VUR, whereas in the presence of renal scars surgical correction is indicated in low/high grade reflux at a young age. Since there are numerous techniques for antireflux surgery available, it is the purpose of this article to critically review these techniques with their specific advantages, typical complications and postoperative management. In general, all surgical technique have a high success rate of 92–98%. The extravesical Lich-Gregoir technique is primarily indicated in unilateral VUR. Children with a high-grade VUR, who are under the age of 3 years and boys are prone to the development of postoperative urinary retention and might be considered for intravesical surgical techniques. The Politano-Leadbetter technique is very helpful in correcting bilateral VUR of any grade in one session to create a neo-ostium in an anatomically correct position which is easily accessible for endourological manipulations. The Psoas hitch ureteroneocystotomy is an excellent technique to correct VUR associated with megaureter, or with duplicated ureters, and VUR failures. Endoscopic subureteral injections are primarily reserved for low grade VUR with a one session success rate of >90%. Endoscopic subureteral injections appear to be an alternative to long-term antibiotics in grade I-III VUR. Laparoscopic antireflux surgery has not gained widespread use due to the very long operating times. Contralateral VUR will occur in about 20% of children undergoing unilateral antireflux surgery; risk factors are severe VUR and VUR into a duplicated system. Postoperative follow-up nowadays consists of urinalysis and ultrasonography; voiding cystourethrography is only indicated in case of febrile urinary tract infection. Despite the excellent success rates following antireflux surgery one has to keep in mind that surgery only corrects the anatomical abnormality. The long-term outcome with regard to renal function, posttherapeutic febrile urinary tract infections and arterial hypertension does not differ significantly from the medication group except for those patients with a demonstrated a genetic background. Therefore, the indication for surgery and the surgical technique applied have to be discussed thoroughly and must be associated with a minimal complication rate.     

Vesicoureteral reflux and bladder dysfunction

The relationship between vesicoureteral reflux and bladder dysfunction is inseparable and has long been emphasized. However, the primary concern of all physicians treating patients with vesicoureteral reflux is the prevention of renal scarring and eventual deterioration of renal function.Bladder dysfunction, urinary tract infection and vesicoureteral reflux are the three important factors which are closely related to each other and contribute to the formation of renal scar. Especially, there is ongoing discussion regarding the role of bladder dysfunction in the prognosis of both medically and surgically treated vesicoureteral reflux. The effect of bladder dysfunction on VUR is mostly via inadequate sphincter relaxation during infancy which is closer to immature bladder dyscoordination rather than true dysfunction. But after toilet training, functional obstruction caused by voluntary sphincter constriction during voiding is responsible through elevation in bladder pressure, thus distorting the architecture of bladder and ureterovesical junction. Reports suggest that voiding phase abnormalities in lower urinary tract dysfunction contributes to lower spontaneous resolution rate of VUR. However, filling phase abnormalities such as involuntary detrusor contraction can also cause VUR even in the absence of dysfunctional voiding. With regards to the effect of bladder dysfunction on treatment, meta-analysis reveals that the cure rate of VUR following endoscopic treatment is less in children with bladder bowel dysfunction but there is no difference for open surgery.The pathophysiology of bladder dysfunction associated with UTI can be explained by the ‘milk-back’ of contaminated urine back into the bladder and significant residual urine resulting from functional outlet obstruction. In addition, involuntary detrusor contraction can decrease perfusion of the bladder mucosa thus decreasing mucosal immunity and creating a condition prone to UTI. In terms of renal scarring, dysfunctional voiding seems to be more closely related to renal damage in association with VUR than overactive bladder. However, studies show that UTI can induce renal scarring even without VUR present and urodynamic abnormalities are quite often detected in these cases. Whether reflux of sterile urine in bladder dysfunction can cause significant renal scarring, especially when intrarenal reflux is present remains controversial. Another issue that warrants further research is the direct relationship between bladder dysfunction and renal scarring, since some reports suggest that these two conditions share a common genotype.Recently some studies have suggest VUR as a causal factor of bladder dysfunction, supported by the fact that bladder dysfunction resolves after injection therapy of VUR. Further study with more objective evaluation of bladder dysfunction may be needed.     

Evolution of acute focal bacterial nephritis into a renal abscess

Acute focal bacterial nephritis (AFBN) is a localized bacterial infection of the kidney presenting as an inflammatory mass without frank abscess formation, which may represent a relatively early stage of renal abscess. The pathogenesis of AFBN is thought to be hematogenous infection or ascending infection from the lower urinary tract. For the majority of children, the pathogenesis may be related to ascending infection, because pre-existing malformative uropathy, especially vesicoureteral reflux (VUR), is common in pediatric patients. Few clinical reports have demonstrated the evolution of this condition into renal abscess in children. We report a girl with AFBN associated with VUR that evolved into a renal abscess despite appropriate intravenous antibiotic therapy. We undertook serial radiological observation of its evolution. It is important to differentiate AFBN from renal abscess because the management of the two entities may be different, and follow-up studies are indispensable to determine appropriate therapy.     

Vesicoureteral reflux and reflux nephropathy

Vesicoureteral reflux is an anatomic abnormality, mostly affecting a pediatric population, which may be the second leading cause of end-stage renal failure. Most cases of reflux are due to abnormalities in the insertion of the ureters into the bladder, either congenital or acquired. Most commonly, VUR is discovered during routine evaluation of urinary tract infections, but may also be present in patients with severe hypertension or chronic renal failure. The diagnosis is confirmed radiologically, utilizing either voiding cinecystography or radioisotopic methods. VUR can result in renal failure through scarring secondary to 'chronic pyelonephritis' or through a glomerulopathy, possibly immune in origin. In most series, the glomerulopathy is felt to be the cause of the end-stage renal failure. Treatment of VUR includes conservative (medical) management with the hope that maturation of the ureterovesical junction will cure reflux. Surgical therapy is reserved for those patients in whom this maturation is not expected to occur or in those whose urinary infections cannot be controlled. In those patients who have developed the glomerulopathy secondary to VUR, surgery may not halt the progression of the renal disease. VUR in a transplanted kidney may result in a higher risk of loss of the graft due to glomerulopathy or chronic rejection.     

Endoscopic Treatment for Vesicoureteral Reflux in Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections in Kidney Transplant: Experience of One Center

Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) after renal transplantation in adult patients has been reported. In renal transplant recipients, symptomatic urinary tract infection can cause high morbidity despite improved immunosuppressive and antibiotic treatment. In our country there have been few reported cases about use of copolymer of dextranomer and hyaluronic acid (DX-HA) injection in a renal transplant. We present 3 cases of recurrent or complicated infections with evidence of high-grade VUR, which were treated with DX-HA. Only 1 case had a partial remission; however, there were no episodes of urinary tract infection in 12 months of follow-up. Suburethral injection is an endoscopic treatment modality with low morbidity in our country.