靶控输注异丙酚复合瑞芬太尼麻醉时NI与BIS监测镇静深度的比较

Objective To compare bispectral index (BIS) with narcotrend index (NI) during propofol-remifentanil anesthesia administered by target-controlled infusion (TCI).Methods Ten ASA Ⅰ or Ⅱ pafients aged 18-56 yr weighing 52-67kg undergoing abdominal surgery lasting>1h were included in this study.BIS and NI were monitored simultaneously.Anesthesia was induced with TCI of propofol with target plasma concentration (Cp) of 3～4μg/ml and remifentanil (Cp 3-4ng/ml).Tracheal intubation was facilitated with cis-atracurium 0.3 mg/kg.The patients were mechanically ventilated.PETCO2 was maintained between 30-35 mm Hg.Anesthesia was maintained with TCI of propofol and remifentanil by the anesthesiologist bhnded to BIS and NI values.according to hemedynamic parameters.BIS and narcotrend values were recorded every minute and compared by another anesthesiologist.All data were compared by Bland-Altman analysis and with Kappa coefficient for agreement.The correlation between BIS and NI was tested by Spearman correlation analysis.The number of error ofjudgement (Type Ⅰ was defined as BIS<40 and NI>62;Type Ⅱ was defined as BIS>60 and NI<20)Was counted.Results The correlation and agreement between BIS and NI during maintenance of propofol-remifentanil anesthesia administered by TCI showed good consistency.Conclusion Both NI and BIS Can help anesthesiologist control the depth of anesthesia during TCI of propofol-remifentanil.     

卵巢周期对患者异丙酚镇静效应的影响

目的 评价卵巢周期对患者异丙酚镇静效应的影响.方法 择期拟行妇科腹腔镜手术患者加例,ASA分级Ⅰ或Ⅱ级,年龄20.加岁,体重指数20～25 kg/m2,根据孕酮水平分为卵泡期组(F组,血清孕酮浓度0.31～1.52 ng/ml)和黄体期组(L组,血清孕酮浓度5.16～18.56 ng/ml),每组20例.麻醉诱导时靶控输注异丙酚,初始血浆靶浓度2 μg/ml,达到预期血浆靶浓度后每隔30 s递增0.5μg/ml直至患者意识消失及BIS值降至50.记录患者意识消失时的BIS值、异丙酚血浆靶浓度,记录BIS值降至50时的异丙酚血浆靶浓度.结果 与L组比较,F组意识消失时和BIS值降至50时的异丙酚血浆靶浓度升高(P＜0.05或0.01),意识消失时的BIS值差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).结论 卵巢周期可影响异丙酚的镇静效应,表现为卵泡期的镇静效应低于黄体期.

Abstract：

Objective To investigate the effect of ovarian cycle on the sedative effect of propofol in patients. Methods Forty ASA Ⅰ or Ⅱ patients, aged 20-40 yr, with body mass index 20-25 kg/m2 , scheduled for elective gynecologic laparoscopic surgery, were divided into 2 groups according to the progesterone level ( n = 20 each): follicular phase group (group F, serum progesterone concentration 0.31-1.52 ng/ml) and luteal phase group (group L, serum progesterone concentration 5.16-18.56 ng/ml). Anesthesia was induced with target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol and iv injection of fentanyl and cisatracurium. The initial target plasma concentration (Cp) of propofol was set at 2 μg/ml, after the Cp reached the predetermined level, the Cp increased by 0.5 μg/ml every 30 s until the patients lost consciousness and BIS value was decreased to 50. The BIS value and Cp of propofol was recorded when the patients lost consciousness. The Cp of propofol was also recorded when BIS value was decreased to 50. The patients were tracheal intubated and mechanically ventilated. Anesthesia was maintained with TCI of propofol combined with remifentanil. BIS value was maintained at 45-55 by adjusting the Cp of propofol. Results The Cps of propofol were significantly higher when the patients lost consciousness and when BIS value was decreased to 50 in group F than in group L ( P ＜ 0.05 or 0.01) . There was no significant difference in BIS value when the patients lost consciousness between the two groups (P ＞ 0.05). Conclusion Ovarian cycle can affect the sedative effect of propofol in patients, which shows that the sedative effect during the follicular phase is lower than that during the luteal phase.     

靶控输注异丙酚复合瑞芬太尼麻醉时NI与BIS监测镇静深度的比较

Objective To compare bispectral index (BIS) with narcotrend index (NI) during propofol-remifentanil anesthesia administered by target-controlled infusion (TCI).Methods Ten ASA Ⅰ or Ⅱ pafients aged 18-56 yr weighing 52-67kg undergoing abdominal surgery lasting>1h were included in this study.BIS and NI were monitored simultaneously.Anesthesia was induced with TCI of propofol with target plasma concentration (Cp) of 3～4μg/ml and remifentanil (Cp 3-4ng/ml).Tracheal intubation was facilitated with cis-atracurium 0.3 mg/kg.The patients were mechanically ventilated.PETCO2 was maintained between 30-35 mm Hg.Anesthesia was maintained with TCI of propofol and remifentanil by the anesthesiologist bhnded to BIS and NI values.according to hemedynamic parameters.BIS and narcotrend values were recorded every minute and compared by another anesthesiologist.All data were compared by Bland-Altman analysis and with Kappa coefficient for agreement.The correlation between BIS and NI was tested by Spearman correlation analysis.The number of error ofjudgement (Type Ⅰ was defined as BIS<40 and NI>62;Type Ⅱ was defined as BIS>60 and NI<20)Was counted.Results The correlation and agreement between BIS and NI during maintenance of propofol-remifentanil anesthesia administered by TCI showed good consistency.Conclusion Both NI and BIS Can help anesthesiologist control the depth of anesthesia during TCI of propofol-remifentanil.     

复合TCI异丙酚时瑞芬太尼抑制支撑喉镜诱发心血管反应的EC50

Objective To determine the median effective concentration(EC50) of remifentanil by TCI inhibiting the cardiovascular response to the placement of operating laryngoscope performed under propofol anesthesia administered by TCI.Methods Twenty ASA Ⅰ orⅡ patients,aged 20-51 yr,weighing 52-83 kg,undergoing extirpation of vocal cord polyps under general anesthesia with remifentanil-pmpofol administered by TCI.were enrolled in the study.The target plasma concentration (Cp) of propofol was set at 4μg/ml.Operating laryngoscope was placed at 3 min after tracheal intubation.HR and MAP were continuously monitored.When HR or MAP increased by 15%,the candiovascular response was defined as positive.The EC50 was determined by up-and-down technique.The initial Cp of remifentanil was set at 5 ng/ml and was increased/decreased by 20%in the next patient if the cardiovascular response was positive or negative.Results No chest wall stiffness and intraoperative awareness occurred in all the patients.The EC50 of remifentanil TCI inhibiting the cardiovascular response to the placement of operating laryngoscope was 3.50ng/ml with confidence interval(CI) between 3.47-3.60 ng/ml.Conclusion Thee EC50 of remifentanil TCI inhibiting cardiovascular response to the placement of operating laryngoscope is 3.50ng/ml with CI between 3.47-3.60ng/ml.     

复合TCI异丙酚时瑞芬太尼抑制支撑喉镜诱发心血管反应的EC50

Objective To determine the median effective concentration(EC50) of remifentanil by TCI inhibiting the cardiovascular response to the placement of operating laryngoscope performed under propofol anesthesia administered by TCI.Methods Twenty ASA Ⅰ orⅡ patients,aged 20-51 yr,weighing 52-83 kg,undergoing extirpation of vocal cord polyps under general anesthesia with remifentanil-pmpofol administered by TCI.were enrolled in the study.The target plasma concentration (Cp) of propofol was set at 4μg/ml.Operating laryngoscope was placed at 3 min after tracheal intubation.HR and MAP were continuously monitored.When HR or MAP increased by 15%,the candiovascular response was defined as positive.The EC50 was determined by up-and-down technique.The initial Cp of remifentanil was set at 5 ng/ml and was increased/decreased by 20%in the next patient if the cardiovascular response was positive or negative.Results No chest wall stiffness and intraoperative awareness occurred in all the patients.The EC50 of remifentanil TCI inhibiting the cardiovascular response to the placement of operating laryngoscope was 3.50ng/ml with confidence interval(CI) between 3.47-3.60 ng/ml.Conclusion Thee EC50 of remifentanil TCI inhibiting cardiovascular response to the placement of operating laryngoscope is 3.50ng/ml with CI between 3.47-3.60ng/ml.     

七氟醚和异丙酚复合麻醉下妇科腹腔镜手术患者脑血流量和颅内压的比较

Objective To compare the cerebral blood flow (CBF) and intracranial pressure (ICP) during laparoscopic gynecologic surgery performed under propofol and sevoflurane combined anesthesia.Methods Forty ASAⅠ orⅡ patients aged 20-59 yr weighing 44-69 kg were randomly divided into 2 groups(n=20 each):propofol group (group P) and sevoflurane group (group S).Anesthesia was induced with TCI of propofol (Ce 4μg/ml) in group P or 8% sevoflurane in group S combined with TCI of remifentanil (Ce 6 ng/ml).Tracheal intubation was facilitated with cis-atracurium 0.15 mg/kg.The patients were mechanically ventilated.PETCO2 was maintained at 35-40 mm Hg.Anesthesia was maintained with TCI of propofol or sevoflurane.inhalation combined with TCI of remifentanil.BIS value was maintained at 45-50 by adjusting Ce of propofol or concentration of sevoflurane.Intraabdominal pressure (IAP) was maintained at 12-14 mm Hg.Transcranial Doppler monitoring wag used.Cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV) and pulsatility index (PI) were recorded at 5 min after supine position(T1)and 5 min after supine lithotomy position before induction(T2),while tracheal tube was being inserted(T3),5 min after tracheal intubation(T4),immediately and 15 min after abdominal CO2 iusnfflation in trendelenburglithotomy position (T5,T6) and at 10 min after deflation of abdomen(T7).Results CBFV was significandy decreased at T3,T4 and T7 in group P and at T4 and T7 in group S as compared with the baseline at T1.CBFV at T3 was significantly lower in group P than in group S.PI at T3,T4 was significantly decreased in group P as compared with the baseline at T1 and was significantly lower than in group S.PI at T5,6 was significantly increased as compared with the baseline in both groups but was not significantly different between the 2 groups.Conclusion When combined with remifentanil.propofol could decrease CBF and ICP while sevoflurane has no significant effect on CBF and ICP after induction.CBF and ICP are significantly increased in both groups after abdominal CO2 insufflation.     

不同麻醉方法对神经外科手术患者脑血管自身调节功能影响的比较

Objective To compare the effect of different methods of anesthesia on cerebral autoregulation in patients undergoing neurosurgery.Methods Sixty-nine ASA Ⅱ orⅢ patients with brain tumor, aged 23-62 yr, scheduled for neurosurgery under general anesthesia, were randomly divided into 3 groups ( n = 23 each) : propofol-remifentanil group (group PR), sevoflurane-remifentanil group (group SR) and propofol-sevoflurane-remifentanil group (group PSR) . Anesthesia was induced with target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol (target plasma concentration3 μg/ml, PR and PSR groups) or inhalation of 8% sevoflurane (group SR) and iv injection of remifentanil 1 mg/kg and atracurium 0.5 mg/kg. The patients were mechanically ventilated after tracheal intubation. PETCO2 was maintained at 32-35 mm Hg. Anesthesia was maintained with TCI of propofol (target plasma concentration 2.0-3.5 μg/ml) in group PR, with inhalation of 1.5%-2.5% sevoflurane in group SR, with TCI of propofol (target plasma concentration 1.5-3.0 μg/ml) and inhalation of 1% sevoflurane in group PSR, and with TCI of remifentanil (target plasma concentration 2.0-4.5 ng/ml) and iv infusion of atracurium at 6 μg · kg-1 · min-1 in all groups. Auditory evoked potential index was maintained between 40-45. The middle cerebral artery time-average peak flow velocity was recorded before induction (baseline) , immediately after intubation, immediately before craniotomy and at the beginning of skin suture. The unilateral carotid artery was compressed for 7 s at the corresponding time points mentioned above. The transient hyperemic response ratio (THRR) was calculated to reflect cerebral autoregulation. Results Compared with the baseline value at T0, THRR was significantly increased at T2in group PR and decreased at T2,3 in group SR (P <0.05) ,while no significant change was found in THRR at T1-3in group PSR (P >0.05). The THRR was significantly lower in SR and PSR groups than in group PR, and higher in group PSR than in group SR ( P < 0.05). Conclusion Propofol-remifentanil anesthesia can improve cerebral autoregulation, sevoflurane-remifentanil anesthesia can reduce cerebral autoregulation, and propofol-sevofluraneremifentanil anesthesia exerts no effect on cerebral autoregulation in patients undergoing neurosurgery.     

不同麻醉方法对神经外科手术患者脑血管自身调节功能影响的比较

Objective To compare the effect of different methods of anesthesia on cerebral autoregulation in patients undergoing neurosurgery.Methods Sixty-nine ASA Ⅱ orⅢ patients with brain tumor, aged 23-62 yr, scheduled for neurosurgery under general anesthesia, were randomly divided into 3 groups ( n = 23 each) : propofol-remifentanil group (group PR), sevoflurane-remifentanil group (group SR) and propofol-sevoflurane-remifentanil group (group PSR) . Anesthesia was induced with target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol (target plasma concentration3 μg/ml, PR and PSR groups) or inhalation of 8% sevoflurane (group SR) and iv injection of remifentanil 1 mg/kg and atracurium 0.5 mg/kg. The patients were mechanically ventilated after tracheal intubation. PETCO2 was maintained at 32-35 mm Hg. Anesthesia was maintained with TCI of propofol (target plasma concentration 2.0-3.5 μg/ml) in group PR, with inhalation of 1.5%-2.5% sevoflurane in group SR, with TCI of propofol (target plasma concentration 1.5-3.0 μg/ml) and inhalation of 1% sevoflurane in group PSR, and with TCI of remifentanil (target plasma concentration 2.0-4.5 ng/ml) and iv infusion of atracurium at 6 μg · kg-1 · min-1 in all groups. Auditory evoked potential index was maintained between 40-45. The middle cerebral artery time-average peak flow velocity was recorded before induction (baseline) , immediately after intubation, immediately before craniotomy and at the beginning of skin suture. The unilateral carotid artery was compressed for 7 s at the corresponding time points mentioned above. The transient hyperemic response ratio (THRR) was calculated to reflect cerebral autoregulation. Results Compared with the baseline value at T0, THRR was significantly increased at T2in group PR and decreased at T2,3 in group SR (P <0.05) ,while no significant change was found in THRR at T1-3in group PSR (P >0.05). The THRR was significantly lower in SR and PSR groups than in group PR, and higher in group PSR than in group SR ( P < 0.05). Conclusion Propofol-remifentanil anesthesia can improve cerebral autoregulation, sevoflurane-remifentanil anesthesia can reduce cerebral autoregulation, and propofol-sevofluraneremifentanil anesthesia exerts no effect on cerebral autoregulation in patients undergoing neurosurgery.     

七氟醚和异丙酚复合麻醉下妇科腹腔镜手术患者脑血流量和颅内压的比较

Objective To compare the cerebral blood flow (CBF) and intracranial pressure (ICP) during laparoscopic gynecologic surgery performed under propofol and sevoflurane combined anesthesia.Methods Forty ASAⅠ orⅡ patients aged 20-59 yr weighing 44-69 kg were randomly divided into 2 groups(n=20 each):propofol group (group P) and sevoflurane group (group S).Anesthesia was induced with TCI of propofol (Ce 4μg/ml) in group P or 8% sevoflurane in group S combined with TCI of remifentanil (Ce 6 ng/ml).Tracheal intubation was facilitated with cis-atracurium 0.15 mg/kg.The patients were mechanically ventilated.PETCO2 was maintained at 35-40 mm Hg.Anesthesia was maintained with TCI of propofol or sevoflurane.inhalation combined with TCI of remifentanil.BIS value was maintained at 45-50 by adjusting Ce of propofol or concentration of sevoflurane.Intraabdominal pressure (IAP) was maintained at 12-14 mm Hg.Transcranial Doppler monitoring wag used.Cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV) and pulsatility index (PI) were recorded at 5 min after supine position(T1)and 5 min after supine lithotomy position before induction(T2),while tracheal tube was being inserted(T3),5 min after tracheal intubation(T4),immediately and 15 min after abdominal CO2 iusnfflation in trendelenburglithotomy position (T5,T6) and at 10 min after deflation of abdomen(T7).Results CBFV was significandy decreased at T3,T4 and T7 in group P and at T4 and T7 in group S as compared with the baseline at T1.CBFV at T3 was significantly lower in group P than in group S.PI at T3,T4 was significantly decreased in group P as compared with the baseline at T1 and was significantly lower than in group S.PI at T5,6 was significantly increased as compared with the baseline in both groups but was not significantly different between the 2 groups.Conclusion When combined with remifentanil.propofol could decrease CBF and ICP while sevoflurane has no significant effect on CBF and ICP after induction.CBF and ICP are significantly increased in both groups after abdominal CO2 insufflation.     

靶控输注瑞芬太尼和异丙酚麻醉诱导时镇静催眠效应的相互作用

Objective To investigate the sedative and hypnotic interaction between remifentanil and propofol by target-controlled infusion (TCI) during induction of anesthesia.Methods Third-two ASA Ⅰ or Ⅱpatients,aged 22-63 yr,body mass index 18-25 kg/m2,scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia,were randomly divided into 4 groups(n=8 each).Group Ⅰ only received TCI pmpofol.GroupⅡ,Ⅲ,and Ⅳreceived a target concentration of 2,4 or 6 ng/ml remifentanil respectively.While the blood-effect site concentrations of remifentanil were equilibrated,patients received TCI of propefol,with an initial target concentration of 0.5μg/ml.After the blood-effect site concentrations of propofol were equilibrated then with 0.5μg/ml increments until the loss consciousness was achieved.The eyelash reflex and state of consciousness were assessed and radial arterial blood sample 6 ml was taken every 3 min to determine the remifentanil and propofol concentrations in blood.Propofol and remifentanil concentrations in blood were measured by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography and high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection respectively.The sedative and hypnotic interaction between propofol and remifentanil was determined with a pharmacodynamie interaction model by regression analysis and determined using the isobolographic method.Results Propofol concentrations in blood were lower in group Ⅱ,Ⅲ and Ⅳ than group Ⅰ(P<0.05).The propofol concentratopms in blood were significantly decreased in trun with the increase in the remifentanil concentrations in blood in group Ⅱ-Ⅳ(P<0.05).At loss of eyelash reflex and loss of consciousness of patients,the pharmacodynamic interaction model by curve fitting was superior to linear regression (P<0.05).At loss of eyelash reflex of patients,the curve fitting result showed EC50,prop=2.77μg/ml and EC50,rem=26.67 ng/ml,and the isobolographic method equation is ECprop/2.77+ECrem/26.67=0.69.At loss of consciousness of patients,the curve fitting result showed EC50,prop==3.76μg/ml and EC50,rem=31.56ng/ml,and the isobolographic method equation is Ecprop/3.76+Ecrem/31.56=0.65.Conclusion Remifentanil (Cp 2-6 ng/ml) and propofol by TCI shows a synergistic type of pharmacodynamic interaction on the sedative and hypnotic during induction of anesthesia.     

小儿瑞芬太尼靶控输注系统的准确性

目的 评价小儿瑞芬太尼靶控输注(TCI)系统的准确性.方法 择期行五官科或泌尿科手术小儿30例,年龄3～12岁,体重10～40 kg,采用随机数字表法,将患儿随机分为2 ng/ml瑞芬太尼组(Ⅰ组)和4 ng/ml瑞芬太尼组(Ⅱ组),每组15例.Ⅰ组和Ⅱ组采用内嵌Minto药代动力学参数的瑞芬太尼TCI系统输注瑞芬太尼,血浆靶浓度分别为2、4 ng/ml,静脉注射异丙酚2 mg/kg,待患儿意识消失后静脉注射维库溴铵0.1 mg/kg诱导气管插管后行机械通气.两组瑞芬太尼血浆靶浓度维持不变,调节异丙酚输注速率,维持脑电双频谱指数45～65或听觉诱发电位指数＜30,间断静脉注射维库溴铵维持肌松.于TCI瑞芬太尼开始后5、10、20、30、40、50、60 min时抽取桡动脉血样,采用高效液相色谱法测定瑞芬太尼血药浓度,计算TCI系统的偏离度、精确度和摆动度.结果 与血浆靶浓度比较,两组瑞芬太尼实测浓度均升高(P＜0.05);Ⅰ组TCI系统的偏离度、精确度和摆动度分别为20.0%、30.0%和25.0%,Ⅱ组分别为17.5%、17.5%和12.5%,与Ⅰ组比较,Ⅱ组TCI系统的精确度和摆动度降低(P＜0.05),偏离度差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).结论 3～12岁小儿采用内嵌Minto药代动力学参数的TCI系统输注瑞芬太尼时准确性不高.     

体外循环下异丙酚靶控输注系统的准确性

目的 评价体外循环下异丙酚靶控输注系统的准确性.方法 择期体外循环下行心脏瓣膜置换术患者20例,ASAⅡ或Ⅲ级,年龄25～64岁,体重50～70 kg.静脉注射咪达唑仑、芬太尼和维库溴铵行麻醉诱导,气管插管后机械通气.麻醉维持采用嵌入Tackley药代动力学参数的靶控输注系统输注异丙酚至术毕,血浆靶浓度为1μ/ml.于体外循环前(T1)、体外循环开始后1、5、10、20、40、60 min(T2-7)、体外循环结束后5、10 min(T8,9)时采集桡动脉血样3 ml,采用反相高效液相色谱法测定血浆异丙酚浓度,计算异丙酚靶控输注系统的偏离度、精确度、摆动度及分散度.结果 T1时异丙酚实测浓度高于血浆靶浓度(P<0.05),T2-4时异丙酚实测浓度与血浆靶浓度差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),T5-9时异丙酚实测浓度高于血浆靶浓度(P<0.05).异丙酚靶控输注系统的偏离度为21%、精确度为29%、摆动度为21%及分散度为-0.06%/h.结论 心脏手术患者体外循环时,采用嵌入Tackley药代动力学参数的异丙酚靶控输注系统的准确性超出临床可接受范围.     

靶控输注异丙酚复合瑞芬太尼麻醉时NI与BIS监测镇静深度的比较

目的 比较靶控输注异丙酚复合瑞芬太尼麻醉时Narcotrend指数(NI)与BIS监测镇静深度的准确性.方法 择期拟在全麻下行腹部手术患者10例,性别不限,ASA Ⅰ或Ⅱ级,年龄18～56岁,体重52～67kg.麻醉诱导后采用靶控输注异丙酚(Cp 3～μg/ml)和瑞芬太尼(Cp 3～4ng/ml),间断静脉注射顺阿曲库铵0.05mg/kg维持麻醉,同时监测BIS和NI,每隔1min成对记录二者的监测值,行相关分析和一致性分析.记录镇静深度判断错误次数(Ⅰ型错误:BIS<40而NI>62;Ⅱ型错误:BIS>60而NI<20).结果 BIS和NI的相关系数=0.812,Kappa系数=0.513(P<0.01).一致性限度(-18.1,6.4);镇静深度判断错误发生率(0.46±0.39)%,其中Ⅰ型错误发生率(0.15±0.11)%,Ⅱ型错误发生率(0.31±0.26)%.结论 NI监测镇静深度与BIS的一致性尚可,可用于靶控输注异丙酚复合瑞芬太尼麻醉时镇静深度的监测.     

不同血浆靶浓度瑞芬太尼对患者异丙酚镇静效应的影响

目的 探讨不同血浆靶浓度瑞芬太尼对患者异丙酚镇静效应的影响.方法 择期拟行腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者80例,性别不限,ASA分级Ⅰ或Ⅱ级,年龄18～60岁,随机分为4组,每组20例.麻醉诱导:Ⅱ～Ⅳ组靶控输注瑞芬太尼,血浆靶浓度分别设为2、4、8 ng/ml,Ⅰ～Ⅳ组均靶控输注异丙酚,初始血浆靶浓度为2μg/ml,随后每间隔1min增加0.5μg/ml,直至BIS值下降至50.患者意识消失时记录BIS值和异丙酚血浆靶浓度,BIS值降至50时记录异丙酚血浆靶浓度及异丙酚总用量.结果 与Ⅰ组比较,Ⅲ组和Ⅳ组患者意识消失时BIS值升高,异丙酚血浆靶浓度降低,BIS值降至50时异丙酚总用量和异丙酚血浆靶浓度降低(P＜0.05).结论 复合异丙酚麻醉时,瑞芬太尼适宜血浆靶浓度为4 ng/ml.     

复合靶控输注异丙酚时瑞芬太尼抑制重症肌无力患者气管插管反应的药效学

目的 探讨复合靶控输注异丙酚时瑞芬太尼抑制重症肌无力患者气管插管反应的药效学.方法 拟行经胸骨正中劈开胸腺切除术的重症肌无力患者45例,ASA Ⅰ或Ⅱ级,TCI异丙酚和瑞芬太尼进行麻醉诱导,异丙酚血浆靶浓度为4 μg/ml,瑞芬太尼初始效应室靶浓度(Ce)为1.8 ng/ml,依次按2.7、4.0、6.0 ng/ml梯度递增,至患者可耐受喉麻管置入声门下进行气管内表麻后,进行气管插管.采用概率单位回归分析法分别计算瑞芬太尼抑制气管插管反应的Ce50和Ce95.结果 瑞芬太尼抑制气管插管反应的Ce50为2.2 ng/ml,其95%可信区间为2.0～2.3 ng/ml;抑制气管插管反应的Ce95为3.0 ng/ml,其95%可信区间为2.8～3.5 ng/ml.结论 复合靶控输注异丙酚(血浆靶浓度为4 μg/ml)时,瑞芬太尼抑制重症肌无力患者气管插管反应的Ce50和Ce95分别为2.2、3.0 ng/ml.     

靶控输注异丙酚复合瑞芬太尼麻醉用于重症肌无力患者胸腺切除术的效果

目的 探讨靶控输注异丙酚复合瑞芬太尼用于重症肌无力患者胸腺切除术的效果.方法 择期拟行胸腺切除术的重症肌无力患者45例,ASA分级Ⅰ或Ⅱ级,年龄16～64岁,体重45～95 kg.麻醉诱导:靶控输注异丙酚(血浆靶浓度4μg/ml)和瑞芬太尼(效应室靶浓度4 ng/ml),2%利多卡因2～3 ml行气管内表面麻醉后行气管插管,机械通气.麻醉维持:靶控输注异丙酚,血浆靶浓度3～5 μg/ml;靶控输注瑞芬太尼,效应室靶浓度3～6 ng/ml.术毕前30 min,静脉注射舒芬太尼0.15μg/kg进行镇痛.记录首次气管插管的成功情况、切皮时患者体动反应情况、苏醒时间、拔除气管导管时间、术毕拔除气管导管情况及心血管事件的发生情况.结果 所有患者均顺利完成气管插管,首次气管插管成功率100%.切皮时无一例患者发生体动反应;苏醒时间1.0～3.2 min;拔除气管导管时间2.6～7.0 min;术毕拔除气管导管率100%.麻醉诱导期间有3例患者发生心动过缓,4例患者发生低血压,对症处理后均恢复正常;术中有3例患者发生心动过缓,对症处理后恢复正常.结论 靶控输注异丙酚复合瑞芬太尼麻醉可安全有效地用于重症肌无力患者胸腺切除手术.     

The performance of a target-controlled infusion of propofol in combination with remifentanil: a clinical investigation with two propofol formulations

Target-controlled infusion (TCI) incorporates the pharmacokinetic variables of an IV drug to facilitate safe and reliable administration. In this clinical study we investigated the performance of propofol TCI in combination with remifentanil. Fifty-four adult patients scheduled for general surgery lasting longer than 1 h received a combined TCI of propofol (Marsh parameter set; propofol randomly either dissolved with long- or middle-/long-chain triglycerides) and remifentanil. Arterial propofol plasma concentrations and hemodynamic and derived electroencephalogram variables were determined at various stages before, during, and after surgery. Measured propofol plasma concentrations exceeded the predicted values by 59%, and 48% when recalculated with the Schnider parameter set. Pharmacokinetic population analysis showed a small central volume of distribution (3.55 L) and reduced clearance (1.31 L/min) for propofol. ASA status and sex were the only variables that had a significant influence on propofol pharmacokinetics. In a second step, a new pharmacokinetic variable set for propofol was determined in the first 27 patients. Post hoc performance analysis of the remaining 27 patients showed improved accuracy using the new variable set. Our results show that when remifentanil and propofol are combined, the Marsh and Schnider parameter sets systematically underestimate propofol plasma concentrations. Presented, in part, at the Annual Meeting of the European Society of Anesthesiologists, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, June 1, 1999, and the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Dallas, Texas, October 12, 1999.     

两种舒芬太尼靶控输注系统的准确性

目的 评价两种舒芬太尼靶控输注系统的准确性.方法 择期手术患者18例,年龄21～64岁,ASA Ⅰ或Ⅱ级,均采用舒芬太尼、异丙酚及维库溴铵行麻醉诱导和维持.随机选择6例患者行体重修正舒芬太尼Gepts药代动力学参数研究,靶控输注舒芬太尼(血浆靶浓度0.8 ng/ml)10 min,输注异丙酚(血浆靶浓度3～4 mg/L),意识消失后静脉注射维库溴铵0.1 mg/kg,靶控输注舒芬太尼(血浆靶浓度0.2～0.8 ng/ml),术毕前30 min停止输注.分别于靶控输注舒芬太尼前、输注舒芬太尼1、3、5、10、20、40、60、90、120和150 min时取桡动脉血3 ml/次,采用ELISA法测定舒芬太尼血药浓度.计算偏离度、准确度,中央室容积(V1)与体重(m)作直线回归分析,并修正药代动力学参数.余12例患者选用上述体重修正后药代动力学参数行临床麻醉,计算舒芬太尼靶控输注系统的偏离度、准确度、分散度、摆动度.结果 采用舒芬太尼Gepts药代动力学参数靶控输注舒芬太尼时,偏离度为16.7%、准确度为42.0%;体重修正后参数为:V1(L)=0.147 m+2.82,K10=0.064 5 min-1、K12=0.108 6 min-1、K21=0.024 5 min-1、K13=0.022 9 min-1、K31=0.001 3 min-1;采用体重修正后药代动力学参数靶控输注舒芬太尼时,偏离度、准确度分别为4.0%、22.3%,较Gepts药代动力学参数靶控输注舒芬太尼时小(P＜0.05),分散度、摆动度分别为-4.4%/h、20.4%.结论 舒芬太尼Gepts药代动力学参数的中央室容积偏大,体重修正后嵌入靶控输注系统,可提高靶控输注的精确度及稳定性,可维持较准确的血药浓度.     

复合TCI异丙酚时瑞芬太尼抑制支撑喉镜诱发心血管反应的EC50

目的 探讨复合TCI异丙酚时瑞芬太尼抑制支撑喉镜诱发心血管反应的半数有效血浆靶浓度(EC50).方法 择期拟行全麻下声带息肉摘除术患者20例,ASAⅠ或Ⅱ级,年龄20～51岁,体重52～83 kg,TCI瑞芬太尼和异丙酚行麻醉诱导,异丙酚血浆靶浓度4μg/ml,瑞芬太尼血浆靶浓度采用序贯法确定,第1例患者瑞芬太尼的血浆靶浓度5ng/ml,相邻靶浓度之比为1.2,以HR或MAP变化幅度超过基础状态15%为心血管反应阳性的判断标准.气管插管后3 min置人支撑喉镜.计算瑞芬太尼抑制支撑喉镜诱发心血管反应的EC50及其95%可信区间(CI).结果 所有患者均未见胸壁僵硬,均未发生术中知晓.瑞芬太尼抑制支撑喉镜诱发心血管反应的EC50为3.50 ng/ml,95%CI为3.47～3.60 ng/ml.结论 复合TCI异丙酚4μg/ml时瑞芬太尼抑制支撑喉镜诱发心血管反应的EC50为3.50 ng/ml,95%CI为3.47～3.60 ng/ml.