Prediction of post-extubation work of breathing

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate which mode of preextubation ventilatory support most closely approximates the work of breathing performed by spontaneously breathing patients after extubation. DESIGN: Prospective observational design. SETTING: Medical, surgical, and coronary intensive care units in a university hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 22 intubated subjects were recruited when weaned and ready for extubation. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects were ventilated with continuous positive airway pressure at 5 cm H2O, spontaneous ventilation through an endotracheal tube (T piece), and pressure support ventilation at 5 cm H2O in randomized order for 15 mins each. At the end of each interval, we measured pulmonary mechanics including work of breathing reported as work per liter of ventilation, respiratory rate, tidal volume, negative change in esophageal pressure, pressure time product, and the airway occlusion pressure 100 msec after the onset of inspiratory flow, by using a microprocessor-based monitor. Subsequently, subjects were extubated, and measurements of pulmonary mechanics were repeated 15 and 60 mins after extubation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There were no statistical differences between work per liter of ventilation measured during continuous positive airway pressure, T piece, or pressure support ventilation (1.17+/-0.67 joule/L, 1.11+/-0.57 joule/L, and 0.97+/-0.57 joule/L, respectively). However, work per liter of ventilation during all three preextubation modes was significantly lower than work measured 15 and 60 mins after extubation (p < .05). Tidal volume during pressure support ventilation and continuous positive airway pressure (0.46+/-0.11 L and 0.44+/-0.11 L, respectively) were significantly greater than tidal volume during both T-piece breathing and spontaneous breathing 15 mins after extubation (p < .05). Negative change in esophageal pressure, the airway occlusion pressure 100 msec after the onset of inspiratory flow, and pressure time product were significantly higher after extubation than during any of the three preextubation modes (p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Work per liter of ventilation, negative change in esophageal pressure, the airway occlusion pressure 100 msec after the onset of inspiratory flow, and pressure time product all significantly increase postextubation. Tidal volume during continuous positive airway pressure or pressure support ventilation overestimates postextubation tidal volume.     

Imposed power of breathing associated with use of an impedance threshold device

OBJECTIVE: To measure the imposed power of breathing (imposed work of breathing per minute) associated with spontaneous breathing through an active impedance threshold device and a sham impedance threshold device. DESIGN: Prospective randomized blinded protocol. SETTING: University medical center. PATIENTS: Nineteen healthy, normotensive volunteers (10 males, 9 females, age range 20-56 y, mean +/- SD weight 54.8 +/- 7.7 kg for females, 84 +/- 8 kg for males). METHODS: The volunteers completed 2 trials of breathing through a face mask fitted with an active impedance threshold device set to open at -7 cm H(2)O pressure, or with a sham impedance threshold device, which was identical to the active device except that it did not contain an inspiratory threshold pressure valve diaphragm. Spontaneous breathing frequency (f), tidal volume (V(T)), exhaled minute ventilation, inspiratory pressure, and inspiratory time were measured with a respiratory monitor, and the data were directed to a laptop computer for real-time calculation of the imposed power of breathing. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in heart rate, respiratory rate, tidal volume, and minute ventilation, with and without inspiratory impedance. For the sham and active impedance threshold device groups, respectively, the mean +/- SD imposed power of breathing values were 0.92 +/- 0.63 J/min and 8.18 +/- 4.52 J/min (p < 0.001), the mean +/- SD inspiratory times were 1.98 +/- 0.86 s and 2.97 +/- 1.1 s (p = 0.001), and the mean +/- SD inspiratory airway/mouth pressures were -1.1 +/- 0.6 cm H(2)O and -11.7 +/- 2.4 cm H(2)O (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Breathing through an active impedance threshold device requires significantly more power than breathing through a sham device. All subjects tolerated the respiratory work load and were able to complete the study protocol.     

Imposed work of breathing during ventilator failure

INTRODUCTION: Ventilators possess an anti-asphyxia valve that allows spontaneous breathing of ambient air during ventilator failure. This study examined the imposed work of breathing and pressure-time product of 8 critical care and 9 portable ventilators, using a laboratory simulation of spontaneous breathing during ventilator failure. METHODS: A test lung was modified to simulate spontaneous breathing with a tidal volume of 0.5 L and peak inspiratory flow of 60 L/min. A pneumotachograph and pressure tap were placed at the proximal airway between the breathing circuit and endotracheal tube. Flow was derived from the pressure drop across the pneumotachograph. Signals were amplified, integrated, and saved to a spreadsheet program, and imposed work of breathing and pressure-time product were calculated. Also measured were the inspiratory pressure required to open the anti-asphyxia valve (cracking pressure), time to cracking pressure, maximum negative inspiratory pressure, and time to maximum negative inspiratory pressure. RESULTS: For the critical care ventilators the mean +/- SD imposed work of breathing ranged from 213.07 +/- 3.53 to 890.63 +/- 0.88 mJ/L and the pressure-time product ranged from 2.67 +/- 0.01 to 13.37 +/- 0.01 cm H(2)O x s/L. For the portable ventilators the mean +/- SD imposed work of breathing ranged from 361.37 +/- 1.22 to 969.60 +/- 22.70 mJ/L and the pressure-time product ranged from 4.52 +/- 0.01 to 16.70 +/- 0.37 cm H(2)O x s/L. CONCLUSIONS: Spontaneous breathing during ventilator failure may impose work approximating the physiologic work of breathing. This imposed work may prevent effective breathing through the anti-asphyxia valve during mechanical ventilator failure due to electrical failure. These results reinforce the need to properly monitor mechanically ventilated patients and to have in place sufficient back-up power supplies and a method of manual ventilation.     

Automated system for detailed measurement of respiratory mechanics

Objective. The mechanical properties of the respiratory system (i.e., elastance and resistance) depend on the frequency, tidal volume, and shape of the flow waveform used for forcing. We developed a system to facilitate accurate measurements of elastance and resistance in laboratory and clinical settings at the frequencies and tidal volumes in the physiologic range of breathing.Methods. A personal computer (PC) is used to drive a common clinically used ventilator while simultaneously collecting measurements of airway flow, airway pressure, and esophageal pressure from the experimental subject or animal at different frequencies and tidal volumes. Analysis analogous to discrete Fourier transform at the fundamental frequency (i.e., ventilator setting) is used to calculate elastances and resistances of the total respiratory system and its components, the lungs and the chest wall. We have shown that this analysis is independent of the high-frequency harmonics that are present in the waveform from clinical ventilators.Results. The system has been used successfully to make measurements in anesthetized/paralyzed dogs and awake or anesthetized human volunteers in the laboratory, and in anesthetized humans in the operating room and intensive care unit. Elastances and resistances obtained with this approach are the same as those obtained during more controlled conditions, e.g., sinusoidal forcing. Conclusions. Accurate, standardized measurements of lung and chest wall properties can be obtained in many settings with relative ease with the system described. These properties, and their frequency and tidal volume dependences in the physiologic range, provide important information to aid in the understanding of changes in respiratory function caused by day-to-day conditions, clinical intervention and pathologies.The authors thank Colin Mackenzie for his suggestions throughout the experiments.This work was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute grants HL-33009 and HL-44128.     

Effects of face mask ventilation in apneic patients with a resuscitation ventilator in comparison with a bag-valve-mask

Bag-valve-mask ventilation in an unprotected airway is often applied with a high flow rate or a short inflation time and, therefore, a high peak airway pressure, which may increase the risk of stomach inflation and subsequent pulmonary aspiration. Strategies to provide more patient safety may be a reduction in inspiratory flow and, therefore, peak airway pressure. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of bag-valve-mask ventilation vs. a resuscitation ventilator on tidal volume, peak airway pressure, and peak inspiratory flow rate in apneic patients. In a crossover design, 40 adults were ventilated during induction of anesthesia with either a bag-valve-mask device with room air, or an oxygen-powered, flow-limited resuscitation ventilator. The study endpoints of expired tidal volume, minute volume, respiratory rate, peak airway pressure, delta airway pressure, peak inspiratory flow rate and inspiratory time fraction were measured using a pulmonary monitor. When compared with the resuscitation ventilator, the bag-valve-mask resulted in significantly higher (mean+/-SD) peak airway pressure (15.3+/-3 vs. 14.1+/-3 cm H2O, respectively; p=0.001) and delta airway pressure (14+/-3 vs. 12+/-3 cm H2O, respectively; p<0.001), but significantly lower oxygen saturation (95+/-3 vs. 98+/-1%, respectively; p<0.001). No patient in either group had clinically detectable stomach inflation. We conclude that the resuscitation ventilator is at least as effective as traditional bag-valve-mask or face mask resuscitation in this population of very controlled elective surgery patients.     

Patients alter power of breathing as the primary response to changes in pressure support ventilation

IntroductionThe patient-ventilator relationship is dynamic as the patient's health fluctuates and the ventilator settings are modified. Spontaneously breathing patients respond to mechanical ventilation by changing their patterns of breathing. This study measured the physiologic response when pressure support (PS) settings were modified during mechanical ventilation.MethodsSubjects were instrumented with a non-invasive pressure, flow, and carbon dioxide airway sensor to estimate tidal volume, respiratory rate, minute ventilation, and end-tidal CO₂. Additionally, a catheter was used to measure esophageal pressure and estimate effort exerted during breathing. Respiratory function measurements were obtained while PS settings were adjusted 569 times between 5 and 25 cmH₂O.ResultsData was collected on 248 patients. The primary patient response to changes in PS was to adjusting effort (power of breathing) followed by adjusting tidal volume. Changes in respiratory rate were less definite while changes in minute ventilation and end-tidal CO₂ appeared unrelated to the change in PS.ConclusionThe data indicates that patients maintain a set minute ventilation by adjusting their breathing rate, volume, and power. The data indicates that the subjects regulate their Ve and PetCO₂ by adjusting power of breathing and breathing pattern.     

Proportional assist versus pressure support ventilation in patients with acute respiratory failure: cardiorespiratory responses to artificially increased ventilatory demand

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that in response to increased ventilatory demand, dynamic inspiratory pressure assistance better compensates for increased workload compared with static pressure support ventilation (PSV). DESIGN: Randomized clinical crossover study. SETTING: General intensive care u nits of a university hospital. PATIENTS: Twelve patients with acute respiratory failure. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received PSV, proportional assist ventilation (PAV), and PAV+ automatic tube compensation (ATC) in random order while maintaining mean inspiratory airway pressure constant. During each setting, ventilatory demand was increased by adding deadspace without ventilator readjustment. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Cardiorespiratory, ventilatory, and work of breathing variables were assessed by routine monitoring plus pneumotachography; airway, esophageal, and abdominal pressure measurements; and nitrogen washout. After deadspace addition, tidal volume and end-expiratory lung volume increased similarly in all ventilatory modalities. Ventilator work, peak inspiratory flow, and maximum airway pressure increased significantly during PAV+ATC when compared with PSV after deadspace addition. However, increase in ventilator work did not result in a smaller increase in patients' work of breathing with elevated ventilatory demand during PAV+ATC (PSV 807 +/- 204 mJ/L, PAV 802 +/- 193 mJ/L, and PAV+ATC 715 +/- 202 mJ/L, p = .11). Increase in patients' work of breathing was mainly caused by a significantly higher resistive workload during PAV and PAV+ATC. CONCLUSION: In patients with acute respiratory failure, dynamic inspiratory pressure assistance modalities are not superior to PSV with respect to cardiorespiratory function and inspiratory muscles unloading after increasing ventilatory demand. The latter might be explained by higher peak flows resulting in nonlinearly increased resistive workload that was incompletely compensated by PAV+ATC.     

Effect of different inspiratory rise time and cycling off criteria during pressure support ventilation in patients recovering from acute lung injury

OBJECTIVE: With many mechanical ventilators, it is possible to modify the time to reach the selected airway pressure and the criteria for cycling off the inflation during pressure support ventilation. This study evaluated the effect of different inspiratory rise time and cycling off criteria on breathing pattern and work of breathing. DESIGN: Clinical study. SETTING: University laboratory. PATIENTS: Ten intubated patients recovering from acute lung injury (PaO2/FiO2 245 +/- 26 torr, positive end-expiratory pressure 9 +/- 3 cm H2O). INTERVENTIONS: We studied two inspiratory rise time criteria (shortest and longest, 0% and 40% of the breath cycle time) and two cycling off criteria (lowest and highest, 5% and 40% of the peak inspiratory flow) at 5 and 15 cm H2O of pressure support. Respiratory rate, tidal volume, and inspiratory and expiratory work of breathing (WOBI and WOBE) were measured. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: At both levels of pressure support ventilation, the shortest inspiratory rise time significantly reduced the WOBI from 0.77 +/- 0.32 to 0.56 +/- 0.23 J/L and from 0.24 +/- 0.28 to 0.08 +/- 0.09 J/L without affecting respiratory rate or tidal volume.At 15 cm H2O of pressure support ventilation, the lowest cycling off criteria significantly reduced respiratory rate from 24.9 +/- 12.1 to 21.5 +/- 12.7 beats/min and increased tidal volume from 0.51 +/- 0.17 to 0.60 +/- 0.26 L. At both levels of pressure support ventilation, the modification of cycling off criteria did not influence WOBI and WOBE. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that in patients recovering from acute lung injury during pressure support ventilation, a) the shortest inspiratory rise time reduces the WOBI; and b) at 15 cm H2O of pressure support ventilation, the lowest cycling off criteria reduces the respiratory rate and increases the tidal volume without modifying the WOBI and WOBE. Modifications of inspiratory rise time and cycling off criteria must be carefully adjusted during pressure support ventilation.     

Noninvasive proportional assist ventilation compared with noninvasive pressure support ventilation in hypercapnic acute respiratory failure

OBJECTIVES: To compare short-term administration of noninvasive proportional assist ventilation (NIV-PAV) and pressure support ventilation (NIV-PSV). DESIGN: Prospective, crossover, randomized study. SETTING: Medicosurgical intensive care unit in a nonteaching hospital. PATIENTS: Twelve chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients admitted for hypercapnic acute respiratory failure. INTERVENTION: NIV-PSV and NIV-PAV given in a randomized order after baseline evaluation in continuous positive airway pressure. Using a flow-triggering ventilator, NIV-PAV was adjusted using the runaway method and compared with NIV-PSV at similar peak inspiratory airway pressure. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Flow, airway pressure, and changes in esophageal pressure were measured and the tidal volume, the patient's inspiratory work of breathing, and the esophageal pressure--time product were calculated. Arterial pH and PaCO(2) were measured and breathing comfort was assessed using a visual analogic scale. Peak inspiratory airway pressure (17 +/- 3 cm H(2)O) and tidal volume were similarly increased with the two modalities with no change in respiratory rate. The change in esophageal pressure was similarly decreased (from 20 +/- 8 cm H(2)O in continuous positive airway pressure to 12 +/- 7 in NIV-PSV and 10 +/- 5 cm H(2)O in NIV-PAV) as well as inspiratory muscle effort indexes. Arterial pH and PaCO(2) were similarly improved. Breathing comfort was significantly improved in NIV-PAV (+38 +/- 38%) but not in NIV-PSV (+11 +/- 23%). The tidal volume was more variable in NIV-PAV (89 +/- 18%) than in NIV-PSV (15 +/- 8%) and changes in tidal volume variability were significantly correlated (p =.02) with changes in breathing comfort. CONCLUSIONS: In chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with hypercapnic acute respiratory failure, NIV-PAV was able to unload inspiratory muscles similarly to NIV-PSV but may be more comfortable than NIV-PSV.     

Comparison of pressure support ventilation and assist control ventilation in patients with acute respiratory failure

We compared the effects of pressure support ventilation (PSV) with those of assist control ventilation (ACV) on the breathing pattern, work of breathing and blood gas exchange in 8 patients with acute respiratory failure. During ACV, the tidal volume was set at 10 ml/kg, and the inspiratory flow was set at 50 to 70l/min. During PSV, the pressure support level selected was 27±5 cm H₂O to make the breathing pattern regular. Tidal volume was significantly higher (908±179 ml vs. 633±96 ml) during PSV than during ACV at a lower peak airway pressure. Respiratory frequency was lower (15±4 breaths/min vs. 24±5 breaths/min) during PSV than during ACV, associated with a lower duty cycle, which improved synchrony between the patient and the ventilator. The oxygen cost of breathing, and estimate based on the inspiratory work added by a ventilator and the oxygen consumption, did not change significantly. PaO₂ was significantly higher during PSV than during ACV. We conclude that PSV using high levels of pressure support can improve the breathing pattern and oxygenation and fully sustain the patient's ventilation while matching his inspiratory efforts.     

Physiological effects of meals in difficult-to-wean tracheostomised patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Objectives To evaluate effects of meals in difficult-to-wean tracheostomised patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases during spontaneous breathing or Inspiratory Pressure Support.Design Prospective, crossover, randomised, and physiological study.Setting Weaning centre.Patients Sixteen COPD undergoing either decreasing levels of pressure support or increasing periods of spontaneous breathing.Measurements Each patient underwent monitoring during a 30-min procedure, during and after meals either under pressure support or spontaneous breathing on two consecutive days. Inductance plethysmography was used to monitor respiratory rate and tidal volume. Tidal volume by a flow transducer, arterial oxygen saturation, pulse rate, end-tidal CO2_, and dyspnoea by a visual analogue scale were also assessed.Results ANOVA analysis showed a significant increase under spontaneous breathing for respiratory rate (P<0.001) and for end tidal CO₂ (P<0.03) induced by the meals. Inspiratory pressure support was associated to significantly greater tidal volume (P<0.001), lower respiratory rate (P<0.032), lower respiratory rate/tidal volume (P<0.001), and lower pulse rate (P<0.047) than spontaneous breathing. Under spontaneous breathing but not under pressure support a statistically worsening in meal-induced dispnoea (P<0.001) was found.Conclusions In tracheostomised difficult-to-wean COPD patients: 1) under unassisted breathing, meals may induce an increase in respiratory rate, end-tidal CO₂, and dyspnoea; 2) inspiratory pressure support ventilation prevents dyspnoea from worsening during meals.     

Site of pressure measurement during spontaneous breathing with continuous positive airway pressure: effect on calculating imposed work of breathing.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the importance of measuring pressure at the tracheal end of the endotracheal tube during spontaneous breathing with continuous positive airway pressure in order to correctly assess: a) the changes in airway pressure and b) the work imposed by the breathing apparatus. DESIGN: Multitrial tests under simulated clinical conditions using a mechanical lung model. SETTING: A research laboratory at a university medical center. INTERVENTIONS: Spontaneous breathing with continuous positive airway pressure, at peak sinusoidal inspiratory flow-rate demands of 30 and then 60 L/min with sizes 6, 7, 8, and 9 mm internal diameter endotracheal tubes at each flow rate. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Pressure, flow rate, and inhaled and exhaled volumes, during simulated spontaneous ventilation with continuous positive airway pressure were measured. Pressure was measured alternately at the "Y" piece of the breathing tubing of the continuous positive airway pressure system and at the tracheal end of the endotracheal tube to calculate the work imposed by the breathing circuit, endotracheal tube, and the total breathing apparatus. Greater changes in pressure and work were measured at the tracheal end of the endotracheal tube than at the "Y" piece of the breathing tubing for all test conditions. For example, at a peak inspiratory flow-rate demand of 30 L/min when pressures measured at the tracheal end of endotracheal tubes were compared with pressures measured at the "Y"piece, the total work imposed by the breathing apparatus increased by approximately 145% with a 6-mm tube, 95% with a 7-mm tube, 50% with an 8-mm tube, and 40% with a 9-mm tube (p less than .05). Measuring pressure at the "Y" piece of the tubing results in significant underestimations of the changes in pressure and the work imposed, especially when the endotracheal tube has a small internal diameter and/or when the peak inspiratory flow-rate demand is high. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that pressure should be measured as close to the patient's airway as possible, i.e., at the tracheal end of the endotracheal tube, rather than using the traditional approach of measuring pressure and assessing work at the inspiratory or expiratory limbs, or "Y" piece of the breathing tubing.     

A new active model lung

A new model lung with the capacity for simulated spontaneous breathing is described. It consists of a modified commercial mechanical ventilator (Kontron ABT 4100), connected in parallel to a compliant system, a cylindric acrylic box with a latex thin membrane substituting for the top. Volume and compliance of the model are 2500 ml and 50 ml cmH₂O^-1, respectively. The modified ventilator simulates physiologic inspiratory flow at a rate of 10 to 30 min^-1 and tidal volume up to 1000 ml, with an inspiratory to expiratory time ratio continuously variable between 1:4 and 4:1. The model has been tested under different respiratory assist techniques, connected either to continuous positive airway pressure proved to be reliable, versatile and bearing satisfactory resemblance to human ventilatory physiology.     

Tracheal pressure control provides automatic and variable inspiratory pressure assist to decrease the imposed resistive work of breathing

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the operation of a continuous positive airway pressure system by using tracheal airway pressure (PT) as the control signal for system operation (i.e., tracheal pressure control). DESIGN: Repeated measures. SETTING: University research laboratory. SUBJECTS: Twelve anesthetized, spontaneously breathing swine. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects were intubated and connected to a tracheal pressure control system (5 cm H2O continuous positive airway pressure). Varying inspiratory flow demands and degrees of partial endotracheal tube occlusion (25%, 50%, and 75%) were studied. Tracheal pressure control was compared with a conventionally controlled system (pressure from breathing circuit Y-piece [PY] used as control signal) during endotracheal tube occlusion. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Imposed resistive work of breathing (work to spontaneously inhale through endotracheal tube and ventilator circuit), work by ventilation system assisting inhalation, PT, PY, tidal volume, and inspiratory flow demands were measured. As inspiratory flow demands increased (range, 0.2-2.3 L/sec), pressure assist increased automatically (range, 5-40 cm H2O) as well as work of breathing by ventilation system assisting inhalation (range, 0.2-2.5 J/L). Imposed resistive work of breathing was nullified at the lower and was negligible at the higher flow demands. During endotracheal tube occlusion with a conventionally controlled system, PY was unchanged, whereas PT decreased (up to -15 cm H2O) and imposed resistive work of breathing increased (up to 1.05 J/L). With tracheal pressure control, PY increased automatically (range, 8-52 cm H2O), whereas PT varied slightly (range, 2 to -4.6 cm H2O). Imposed resistive work of breathing was negligible (range, 0-0.2 J/L). Breathing circuit pressure (PY), not pulmonary airway pressure (PT), increased significantly during tracheal pressure control. CONCLUSIONS: Tracheal pressure control results in automatic and variable levels of pressure assist to decrease imposed resistive work of breathing under conditions of varying spontaneous inspiratory flow demands and endotracheal tube occlusion. Conventional systems are potentially flawed when PY is used as the control signal because they do not function in this manner and do not accurately assess pulmonary airway pressure.     

Work of breathing, inspiratory flow response, and expiratory resistance during continuous positive airway pressure with the ventilators EVITA-2, EVITA-4 and SV 300

Objective

To analyze work of breathing (WOB) imposed by the respirators EVITA-2, EVITA-4 (Drägerwerk, Lübeck, Germany) and SV 300 (Siemens-Elema, Sweden) as well as inspiratory flow response and expiratory flow resistance during continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP).

Design

Five study conditions on a lung model (CPAP at 0, 5, and 10 mbar, CPAP 5 mbar plus pressure support 2 mbar with both EVITA models, and CPAP 5 mbar with decreasing levels of flow and pressure trigger sensitivity with the SV 300) and three randomized study conditions in nine patients recovering from open heart surgery (condition A: EVITA-2, CPAP 5 mbar; condition B: SV 300, CPAP 5 mbar, flow trigger; condition C: SV 300, pressure trigger — 4 mbar).

Setting

University hospital intensive care unit and laboratory of pulmonary physiology.

Measurements and results

At each study condition we measured WOB, pressure-time product (PTP), WOB and PTP imposed (WOB_imposed and PTP_imposed), tidal volume, minute ventilation, respiratory rate, inspiratory trigger time, trigger pressure, trigger PTP, duration of inspiration, mean and peak inspiratory flow, and the delay from the onset of inspiration to peak inspiratory flow. Since the SV 300 automatically generates an additional pressure support of 2 cm H₂O PTP, WOB, WOB_imposed, and PTP_imposed were higher with the EVITA-2 and EVITA-4 regardless of the trigger sensitivity set on the SV 300. The difference was neutralized with both types of EVITA ventilator by adding 2 mbar of pressure support during CPAP in order to achieve comparable conditions. Inspiratory flow response was faster with both EVITA models, expiratory flow resistance was higher with the SV 300. Decrements of trigger sensitivity with the SV 300 accelerated the flow response.

Conclusions

Under similar conditions, no difference in WOB_imposed was observed, although inspiratory flow response and expiratory flow resistance differed substantially between the three ventilators tested. Trigger sensitivity plays a minor role in determining PTP and WOB but has major influence on flow.     

A strategy to optimise the performance of the mouth-to-bag resuscitator using small tidal volumes: effects on lung and gastric ventilation in a bench model of an unprotected airway

When ventilating an unintubated patient with a standard adult self-inflating bag, high peak inspiratory flow rates may result in high peak airway pressures with subsequent stomach inflation. In a previous study we have tested a newly developed mouth-to-bag-resuscitator (max. volume, 1500 ml) that limits peak inspiratory flow, but the possible advantages were masked by excessive tidal volumes. The mouth-to-bag-resuscitator requires blowing up a balloon inside the self-inflating bag that subsequently displaces air, which then flows into the patient's airway. Due to this mechanism, gas flow and peak airway pressures are reduced during inspiration when compared with a standard bag-valve-mask-device. In addition, the device allows the rescuer to use two hands instead of one to seal the mask on the patient's face. The purpose of the present study was to assess the effects of the mouth-to-bag-resuscitator, which was modified to produce a maximum tidal volume of 500 ml, compared with a paediatric self-inflating bag (max. volume, 380 ml), and a standard adult self-inflating bag (max. volume, 1500 ml) in an established bench model simulating an unintubated patient with respiratory arrest. The bench model consisted of a face mask, manikin head, training lung (lung compliance, 100 ml/0.098 kPa (100ml/cm H2O); airway resistance, 0.39 kPa/(l s) (4 cm H2O/(l s)), and a valve simulating lower oesophageal sphincter pressure, 1.47 kPa (15 cm H2O). Twenty critical care nurses volunteered for the study and ventilated the manikin for 1 min with a respiratory rate of 20 min(-1) with each ventilation device in random order. The mouth-to-bag-resuscitator versus paediatric self-inflating bag resulted in significantly (P < 0.05) higher lung tidal volumes (302 +/- 41 ml versus 233 +/- 22 ml), and peak airway pressure (10 +/- 1 cm H2O versus 9 +/- 1 cm H2O), but comparable inspiratory time fraction (28 +/- 5% versus 27 +/- 5%, Ti/Ttot), peak inspiratory flow rate (0.6 +/- .01 l/s versus 0.6 +/- 0.2 l/s), and stomach inflation (149 +/- 495 ml/min versus 128 +/- 278 ml/min). In comparison with the adult self-inflating bag, there was significantly (P < 0.05) less gastric inflation (3943 +/- 4896 ml/min versus 149 +/- 495 ml/min versus 128 +/- 278 ml/min, respectively) with both devices, but the standard adult self-inflating bag had significantly higher lung tidal volumes (566 +/- 77 ml), peak airway pressure (13 +/- 1 cm H2O), and peak inspiratory flow rate (0.8 +/- 0.11 l/s). In conclusion, comparing the mouth-to-bag-resuscitator with small tidal volumes versus the paediatric self-inflating-bag during simulated ventilation of an unintubated patient in respiratory arrest resulted in comparable marginal stomach inflation, but significantly reduced the likelihood of gastric inflation compared to the adult self-inflating-bag. Lung tidal volumes were improved from approximately 250 ml with the paediatric self-inflating-bag to approximately 300 ml with the mouth-to-bag-resuscitator.     

Pressure-controlled versus volume-controlled ventilation: does it matter?

Volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) and pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) are not different ventilatory modes, but are different control variables within a mode. Just as the debate over the optimal ventilatory mode continues, so too does the debate over the optimal control variable. VCV offers the safety of a pre-set tidal volume and minute ventilation but requires the clinician to appropriately set the inspiratory flow, flow waveform, and inspiratory time. During VCV, airway pressure increases in response to reduced compliance, increased resistance, or active exhalation and may increase the risk of ventilator-induced lung injury. PCV, by design, limits the maximum airway pressure delivered to the lung, but may result in variable tidal and minute volume. During PCV the clinician should titrate the inspiratory pressure to the measured tidal volume, but the inspiratory flow and flow waveform are determined by the ventilator as it attempts to maintain a square inspiratory pressure profile. Most studies comparing the effects of VCV and PCV were not well controlled or designed and offer little to our understanding of when and how to use each control variable. Any benefit associated with PCV with respect to ventilatory variables and gas exchange probably results from the associated decelerating-flow waveform available during VCV on many ventilators. Further, the beneficial characteristics of both VCV and PCV may be combined in so-called dual-control modes, which are volume-targeted, pressure-limited, and time-cycled. PCV offers no advantage over VCV in patients who are not breathing spontaneously, especially when decelerating flow is available during VCV. PCV may offer lower work of breathing and improved comfort for patients with increased and variable respiratory demand.     

A pilot study quantifying the shape of tidal breathing waveforms using centroids in health and COPD

During resting tidal breathing the shape of the expiratory airflow waveform differs with age and respiratory disease. While most studies quantifying these changes report time or volume specific metrics, few have concentrated on waveform shape or area parameters. The aim of this study was to derive and compare the centroid co-ordinates (the geometric centre) of inspiratory and expiratory flow–time and flow–volume waveforms collected from participants with or without COPD. The study does not aim to test the diagnostic potential of these metrics as an age matched control group would be required. Twenty-four participants with COPD and thirteen healthy participants who underwent spirometry had their resting tidal breathing recorded. The flow–time data was analysed using a Monte Carlo simulation to derive the inspiratory and expiratory flow–time and flow–volume centroid for each breath. A comparison of airflow waveforms show that in COPD, the breathing rate is faster (17 ± 4 vs 14 ± 3 min^?1) and the time to reach peak expiratory flow shorter (0.6 ± 0.2 and 1.0 ± 0.4 s). The expiratory flow–time and flow–volume centroid is left-shifted with the increasing asymmetry of the expired airflow pattern induced by airway obstruction. This study shows that the degree of skew in expiratory airflow waveforms can be quantified using centroids.     

Interactive Simulation System for Artificial Ventilation on the Internet: Virtual Ventilator

Objective. To develop an interactive simulation system “virtual ventilator” that demonstrates the dynamics of pressure and flow in the respiratory system under the combination of spontaneous breathing, ventilation modes, and ventilator options. The simulation system was designed to be used by unexperienced health care professionals as a self-training tool. Methods. The system consists of a simulation controller and three modules: respiratory, spontaneous breath, and ventilator. The respiratory module models the respiratory system by three resistances representing the main airway, the right and left lungs, and two compliances also representing the right and left lungs. The spontaneous breath module generates inspiratory negative pressure produced by a patient. The ventilator module generates driving force of pressure or flow according to the combination of the ventilation mode and options. These forces are given to the respiratory module through the simulation controller. Results. The simulation system was developed using HTML, VBScript (3000 lines, 100 kB) and ActiveX control (120 kB), and runs on Internet Explorer (5.5 or higher). The spontaneous breath is defined by a frequency, amplitude and inspiratory patterns in the spontaneous breath module. The user can construct a ventilation mode by setting a control variable, phase variables (trigger, limit, and cycle), and options. Available ventilation modes are: controlled mechanical ventilation (CMV), continuous positive airway pressure, synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV), pressure support ventilation (PSV), SIMV + PSV, pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV), pressure-regulated volume control (PRVC), proportional assisted ventilation, mandatory minute ventilation (MMV), bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP). The simulation system demonstrates in a graph and animation the airway pressure, flow, and volume of the respiratory system during mechanical ventilation both with and without spontaneous breathing. Conclusions. We developed a web application that demonstrated the respiratory mechanics and the basic theory of ventilation mode.