High dose rate brachytherapy as a boost for the treatment of localized prostate cancer

PURPOSE: We report the outcome and toxicities of high dose rate brachytherapy as a boost for localized prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1996 and 2003, 309 patients with prostate carcinoma were treated with external beam radiation therapy and high dose rate brachytherapy. Furthermore, 36% of the patients received neoadjuvant/concurrent or adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy. Patients were stratified into 3 groups. Group 1 of 67 patients had Gleason score 6 or less, pretreatment prostate specific antigen 10 ng/ml or less and clinical stage T2a or less. Group 2 of 109 patients had Gleason score 7 or greater, pretreatment prostate specific antigen greater than 10 ng/ml and clinical stage T2b or greater. Group 3 of 133 patients had 2 or more of these higher risk factors. RESULTS: At a median followup of 59 months the 5-year biochemical control rate, as defined by the American Society for Therapeutic Radiation and Oncology, was 86%, cause specific survival was 98% and overall survival was 91%. Biochemical control in stratified groups 1 to 3 was 98%, 90% and 78%, respectively. On univariate analysis risk group, pretreatment prostate specific antigen and Gleason score were significant predictors of biochemical control. However, on multivariate analysis only risk group and pretreatment prostate specific antigen were significant. Using the Common Toxicity Criteria scale there were 2 cases of grade 3 acute urinary toxicity. Regarding late side effects 4% of patients had grade 3 genitourinary toxicity and 1 had a grade 4 rectal complication. CONCLUSIONS: External beam radiation therapy and high dose rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer resulted in excellent biochemical control, cause specific survival and overall survival with minimal severe acute or late complications.     

Percentage of positive biopsy cores as predictor of clinical outcome in prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy

PURPOSE: The clinical significance of pretreatment biopsy characteristics is not well understood relative to known prognostic factors. We performed a complete pathology analysis of pretreatment biopsy specimens in an attempt to clarify their impact on clinical outcome following radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1991 to 1999, 160 patients with locally advanced prostate cancer were prospectively treated with external beam radiotherapy in combination with high dose rate brachytherapy at our hospital and had pretreatment biopsy material available for complete pathological review. Patients with pretreatment prostate specific antigen (PSA) 10.0 ng./ml. or greater, Gleason 7 or greater or clinical stage T2b-T3c N0 M0 disease were eligible for study entry. Pelvic external beam radiotherapy (46.0 Gy.) was supplemented with 3 (1991 to 1995) or 2 (1995 to 1999) ultrasound guided transperineal interstitial iridium high dose rate implants. The brachytherapy dose was escalated from 5.50 to 10.50 Gy. per implant. All pretreatment biopsy specimen slides from each case were reviewed by a single pathologist (N. S. G.). Median followup was 4.2 years. Biochemical failure was defined as 3 consecutive PSA increases. RESULTS: On univariate analysis pretreatment PSA, Gleason score, clinical T classification, percentage of positive biopsy cores, dose per implant and total radiotherapy dose (equivalent in 2 Gy. fractions) were significantly associated with biochemical failure. Perineural invasion was of borderline significance (p = 0.07). On univariate analysis for clinical failure only Gleason score and percent positive cores were significant. Percent positive cores was associated with biochemical and clinical failure whether analyzed in subgroups or as a continuous variable. Patients with less than 33% positive cores had a 5-year biochemical control rate of 83% and 5-year clinical failure rate of only 7%. Conversely, patients with more than 67% positive cores had a 5-year biochemical control rate of only 57% and 25% had clinical failure at 5 years. Since percent positive cores correlated with biochemical and clinical failure, an analysis was performed to determine which other prognostic factors were associated with percent positive cores. Pretreatment PSA level, Gleason score, clinical T classification and perineural invasion were significantly associated with a higher percent positive cores. Nevertheless, on Cox multiple regression analysis higher percent positive cores, pretreatment PSA and Gleason score remained independently associated with biochemical failure but not T classification. On Cox multiple regression analysis for clinical failure only Gleason score remained independently significant with percent positive cores maintaining borderline significance (p = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: Percent positive pretreatment biopsy cores is a powerful predictor of biochemical and clinical outcome for prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy, independent of other known prognostic factors. Percent positive cores should be seriously considered as a primary factor in risk group stratification for prostate cancer.     

Isolated local recurrence is rare after radical prostatectomy in men with Gleason 7 prostate cancer and positive surgical margins: therapeutic implications

PURPOSE: We determined whether the high biochemical failure rate in men with Gleason score 7 disease and positive surgical margins after radical retropubic prostatectomy is secondary to distant metastasis or to local tumor recurrence that could be eliminated by immediate adjuvant radiation therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1982 and 1997, 112 men with Gleason score 7 disease and positive surgical margins but no seminal vesicle or lymph node involvement underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy without immediate adjuvant radiation or hormonal therapy. Median followup was 8 years (range 1 to 16) and 45 men (40%) were followed 10 years or more. Kaplan-Meier actuarial survival estimates were used to determine the actuarial 5 and 10-year post-prostatectomy, and 5-year post-radiation recurrence rates. RESULTS: The actuarial 5 and 10-year post-prostatectomy biochemical, local and distant recurrence rates were 40% and 52%, 6% and 6%, and 7% and 16%, respectively. For 20 men who received radiation therapy for isolated prostate specific antigen elevation actuarial 5-year post-radiation biochemical recurrence-free rate was 34%. For 5 men who received radiation therapy for local recurrence actuarial 5-year post-radiation biochemical recurrence-free rate was 20%. CONCLUSIONS: Isolated clinical local recurrence is rare during long-term followup of men with Gleason score 7 disease and positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy. Radiation therapy given at prostate specific antigen elevation poorly controlled the disease. Because patients with biochemical failure rarely had local recurrence at long-term followup, they most likely harbored subclinical distant metastasis. These data suggest that immediate adjuvant radiation therapy will not have a major impact on outcome because most men with Gleason score 7 disease and positive surgical margins in whom treatment fails most likely had distant metastasis at surgery. To improve the outcome in cases of Gleason score 7 disease and positive surgical margins a systemic approach to adjuvant therapy is necessary.     

Combined external beam radiotherapy and Pd-103 brachytherapy boost improves biochemical failure free survival in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer: results of a matched pair analysis

BACKGROUND: Dose escalation has resulted in improved biochemical control in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer treated with conformal external beam radiation (EBRT). Conformal dose distributions may also be achieved with brachytherapy. Therefore, biochemical control was evaluated for patients treated with combined external radiation therapy and low dose rate brachytherapy (EBRT + LDR). METHODS: A matched pair analysis was performed to compare biochemical control of patients treated with EBRT + LDR to patients treated with EBRT alone. The study endpoints were biochemical control and late toxicities. RESULTS: The 5-year biochemical failure free survival (BFFS) was 86% for patients treated with EBRT + LDR and 72% for patients treated with EBRT (P = 0.03). Both treatments were associated with comparable incidences of late genitourinary (GU) side effects (18-19%). Late rectal toxicity was decreased by 15% in patients treated with EBRT + LDR (P = 0.0003). CONCLUSIONS: These results support EBRT followed by brachytherapy boost as a safe and effective method for dose escalation in the treatment of prostate cancer.     

High dose radiation delivered by intensity modulated conformal radiotherapy improves the outcome of localized prostate cancer

PURPOSE: We present the long-term outcome and tolerance of 3-dimensional (D) conformal and intensity modulated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between October 1988 and December 1998, 1,100 patients with clinical stages T1c-T3 prostate cancer were treated with 3-D conformal or intensity modulated radiation therapy. Patients were categorized into prognostic risk groups based on pretreatment prostate specific antigen (PSA), Gleason score and clinical stage. Sextant biopsies were performed 2.5 years or greater after treatment to assess local control. PSA relapse was defined according to the consensus guidelines of the American Society for Therapeutic Radiation Oncology. Late toxicity was classified according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group morbidity grading scale. Median followup was 60 months. RESULTS: At 5 years the PSA relapse-free survival rate in patients at favorable, intermediate and unfavorable risk was 85% (95% confidence interval [CI] +/- 4), 58% (95% CI +/- 6) and 38% (95% CI +/- 6), respectively (p <0.001). Radiation dose was the most powerful variable impacting PSA relapse-free survival in each prognostic risk group. The 5-year actuarial PSA relapse-free survival rate for patients at favorable risk who received 64.8 to 70.2 Gy. was 77% (95% CI +/- 8) compared to 90% (95% CI +/- 8) for those treated with 75.6 to 86.4 Gy. (p = 0.04) [corrected]. The corresponding rates were 50% (95% CI +/- 8) versus 70% (95% CI +/- 6) in intermediate risk cases (p = 0.001), and 21% (95% CI +/- 8) versus 47% (95% CI +/- 6) in unfavorable risk cases (p = 0.008) [corrected]. Only 4 of 41 patients (10%) who received 81 Gy. had a positive biopsy 2.5 years or greater after treatment compared with 27 of 119 (23%) after 75.6, 23 of 68 (34%) after 70.2 and 13 of 24 (54%) after 64.8 Gy. The incidence of toxicity after 3-D conformal radiation therapy was dose dependent. The 5-year actuarial rate of grade 2 rectal toxicity in patients who received 75.6 Gy. or greater was 14% (95% CI +/- 2) compared with 5% (95% CI +/- 2) in those treated at lower dose levels (p <0.001). Treatment with intensity modulated radiation therapy significantly decreased the incidence of late grade 2 rectal toxicity since the 3-year actuarial incidence in 189 cases managed by 81 Gy. was 2% (95% CI +/- 2) compared with 14% (95% CI +/- 2) in 61 managed by the same dose of 3-D conformal radiation therapy (p = 0.005). The 5-year actuarial rate of grade 2 urinary toxicity in patients who received 75.6 Gy. or greater 3-D conformal radiation therapy was 13% compared with 4% in those treated up to lower doses (p <0.001). Intensity modulated radiation therapy did not affect the incidence of urinary toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Sophisticated conformal radiotherapy techniques with high dose 3-D conformal and intensity modulated radiation therapy improve the biochemical outcome in patients with favorable, intermediate and unfavorable risk prostate cancer. Intensity modulated radiation therapy is associated with minimal rectal and bladder toxicity, and, hence, represents the treatment delivery approach with the most favorable risk-to-benefit ratio.     

Treatment of intermediate-risk prostate cancer with brachytherapy without supplemental pelvic radiotherapy: a review of the H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center experience

PURPOSE: To determine the biochemical outcomes of patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated at the H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center with an I-125 permanent seed implant without supplemental pelvic radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Under an institutional review board approved protocol, the charts of 88 patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer and a minimum follow-up of 36 months treated with brachytherapy without supplemental pelvic radiotherapy were reviewed. Median follow-up for the whole cohort was 57 months (range 37-121). Biochemical failure was defined using the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology definition. RESULTS: The 5-year biochemical failure-free survival for the cohort was 83%. Patients with perineural invasion had a worse biochemical outcome, which was statistically significant (perineural invasion vs. no perineural invasion, 5-year biochemical failure-free survival 64% vs. 89%, P = 0.004). None of the following factors were found significant in this subset of patients: Gleason scores 6 versus 7, primary Gleason grades 3 versus 4, percentage of core positive <20% versus >20%, number of cores positive <2 versus 2 versus >2, hormonal therapy versus no hormonal therapy, T1 versus T2, prostate-specific antigen <10 versus >10, or > or =2 intermediate risk factors versus 1 intermediate risk factor. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer may be treated effectively with brachytherapy without supplemental pelvic radiotherapy. However, because of the limited nature of our study, we cannot exclude that patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer may benefit from supplemental external beam radiotherapy.     

Salvage radiotherapy for isolated prostate specific antigen increase after radical prostatectomy: evaluation of prognostic factors and creation of a prognostic scoring system

PURPOSE: This study was performed to evaluate the results and prognostic factors associated with radiotherapy for a detectable serum prostate specific antigen level after radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From July 1987 through July 2003, 368 patients received radiotherapy for a detectable prostate specific antigen level (biochemical relapse) as the sole evidence of recurrence after radical prostatectomy for node negative prostate cancer. Estimated survival and relapse-free probabilities were obtained via Kaplan-Meier estimation. Associations of patient factors with survival and biochemical relapse were investigated using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: With a median followup of 5 years the 5 and 8-year freedom from biochemical relapse were an estimated 46% (95% CI 41%-53%) and 35% (95% CI 29%-43%) while survival was 92% (95% CI 89%-95%) and 80% (95% CI 74%-87%), respectively. Patient and treatment variables showing evidence of association with biochemical relapse on multivariate analysis included pathological stage T3a or less vs T3b (seminal vesicle involvement, p = 0.029), pathological Gleason score 7 or less vs 8 or greater (p <0.001) and pre-radiotherapy prostate specific antigen (p <0.001). Four biochemical failure risk groups were created by assigning seminal vesicle involvement, Gleason score and pre-radiotherapy prostate specific antigen each a score of 0 to 2. These individual scores were summed. The freedom from biochemical failure at 5 years for each risk group was 0 to 1-69%, 2-53%, 3-26% and 4 to 5-6%. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of seminal vesicle involvement and high Gleason score in the radical prostatectomy specimen are inherent predictors of adverse outcome. Early referral for salvage radiotherapy can decrease subsequent biochemical relapse.     

Comparing prostate specific antigen outcomes after different types of radiotherapy management of clinically localized prostate cancer highlights the importance of controlling for established prognostic factors

PURPOSE: We evaluated the impact that the composition of prognostic factors in a patient cohort may have on prostate specific antigen (PSA) outcome following external beam radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The distribution of PSA, biopsy Gleason score and American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) T stage in men with prostate cancer treated with interstitial plus external beam radiation therapy was used to select a matched cohort who underwent 3-dimensional (D) conformal external beam radiation therapy. We compared PSA outcomes after 3-D conformal external beam radiation therapy in the overall and matched cohorts of 766 and 570 patients, respectively. RESULTS: Men treated with interstitial plus external beam radiation therapy had a significantly lower rate of PSA greater than 10 to 20 (p = 0. 02) and greater than 20 ng./ml. (p <0.0001), biopsy Gleason score 7 (p = 0.02) and 8 to 10 (p <0.0001), and AJCC stage T2c disease (p <0. 0001). Likewise, these men also had a significantly higher rate of PSA greater than 4 to 10 ng./ml. (p <0.0001), biopsy Gleason score 5 to 6 (p = 0.0001) and AJCC stage T1 disease (p <0.0001) than those who underwent 3-D conformal external beam radiation therapy. The 5-year estimate of PSA failure-free survival after 3-D conformal external beam radiation therapy was 45% versus 67% (p = 0.0007) for all 766 consecutively treated patients and the matched cohort of 570, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The composition of prognostic factors in a patient cohort may impact PSA outcome. Therefore, controlling for established prognostic factors is essential when comparing PSA outcome after different forms of radiotherapy for adenocarcinoma of the prostate.     

Late normal tissue sequelae in the second decade after high dose radiation therapy with combined photons and conformal protons for locally advanced prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: We determined the long-term normal tissue effects of 77.4 Gy. delivered to the prostate in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1976 and 1992, 167 men with stages T3 to 4 prostate cancer were treated on protocol with 50.4 Gy. photons at 1.8 Gy. per fraction using a 4-field box arrangement, followed by a conformal perineal proton boost of 27 Gy. (cobalt Gy. equivalent) in 11 fractions. The chart was reviewed and 39 of the 42 surviving patients were interviewed. Median followup was 13.1 years (range 7 to 23). Normal tissue morbidity was recorded using Radiation Therapy Oncology Group criteria and the late effects normal tissue scale. RESULTS: The actuarial incidence of grade 2 or greater genitourinary morbidity was 59% at 15 years. However, these grade 2 or greater problems persisted to the time of the interview in only 7 of 39 cases. The actuarial incidence of grade 2 or greater hematuria was 21% at 5 years and 47% at 15. For grade 3 or greater hematuria the risk was 3% and 8% at 5 and 15 years, respectively. No patient required cystectomy but 1 required diversion for morbidity. Urethral stricture and urinary incontinence with pads needed developed in 4 and 3 men, respectively. This particular morbidity was strongly associated with previous or subsequent prostate surgery. The actuarial incidence of grade 2 or greater gastrointestinal morbidity was 13% at 5 and 15 years, while grade 1 rectal bleeding occurred in another 41%. CONCLUSIONS: High dose conformal radiation to the prostate is followed by a high rate of low grade rectal bleeding but a low rate of grade 2 or higher gastrointestinal morbidity. This rate is stable and does not increase beyond 5 years. Genitourinary morbidity continues to develop well into the second decade after treatment, although high grade morbidity is uncommon. These findings do not suggest that the modern trend toward high dose prostate treatment with conformal techniques will result in a high incidence of serious and permanent late sequelae but it appears that hematuria will be common.     

The role of external beam irradiation in patients undergoing prostate brachytherapy

6. From this cohort, a matched-pair analysis was performed to better assess the role of EBT and TIPPB (n = 215). PSA relapse-free survival was based on the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology Consensus Panel definition. Kaplan-Meier actuarial survival curves were compared to assess various prognostic factors. The median follow-up for all 215 matched patients was 44 months (range, 24-81) with an actuarial PSA relapse-free survival (RFS) at 5 years of 81.1%. Patients treated with EBT and TIPPB had a 5-year PSA RFS of 83.5% whereas patients treated with TIPPB only had a 5-year PSA RFS of 79.4% (p = 0.715)10 ng/ml. Risk group analysis combining PSA, Gleason score, and stage failed to identify any risk group for which the addition of EBT was significant. Analysis of postimplant dosimetry using the dose to 90% of the prostate volume (D90) failed to distinguish any difference between groups. A significant advantage for combining EBT and TIPPB could not be demonstrated in this retrospective matched-pair analysis. These data indicate that the role and rationale of combined treatment in prostate brachytherapy requires better clarification, with a prospective randomized trial.     

Prostate-specific antigen relapse-free survival in patients with localized prostate cancer treated by brachytherapy

OBJECTIVE: To report the clinical outcome after permanent implantation of (125)iodine seeds (brachytherapy) for early prostate cancer, after 8.2 years of follow-up. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between March 1995 and December 2001, 667 men (mean age 63 years, range 42-77) were treated with brachytherapy at the one cancer centre; 346 (51.9%) had a short course of neoadjuvant hormone therapy. The prescribed minimum peripheral dose was 145 Gy. No patient received external beam radiation. RESULTS: The median (range) follow-up was 31 (18-98.2) months; 41 patients were lost to follow-up. The actuarial biochemical relapse-free survival was 74.9%; 100 patients had biochemical relapse (international definition). In all, 20 patients had clinical relapse, and 24 died (10 from prostate cancer). The prostate-specific antigen (PSA) relapse-free survival was 78.3%, 66.5% and 56.4% for patients with Gleason scores of <7, 7 and > 7, respectively, and was 81.4%, 69.8% and 36.3% for those with PSA levels of <10, 10-20 and > 20 ng/mL, respectively (both P < 0.001). There was a strong cohort effect depending on year of implant, with progressive annual improvements in relapse-free survival (P < 0.001). Hormone therapy, tumour stage, prostate volume before implantation, age and D90 dose had no significant effect on the outcome. CONCLUSION: The overall relapse-free survival for all patients was 75%; the initial PSA, Gleason score and risk group were significant factors predicting the outcome. Increasing clinical experience was associated with a better outcome but neoadjuvant hormone therapy had no effect.     

Conformal proton therapy for early-stage prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of proton radiation on clinical and biochemical outcomes for early prostate cancer. METHODS: Three hundred nineteen patients with T1-T2b prostate cancer and initial prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels 15.0 ng/mL or less received conformal radiation doses of 74 to 75 cobalt gray equivalent with protons alone or combined with photons. No patient had pre- or post-treatment hormonal therapy until disease progression was documented. Patients were evaluated for biochemical disease-free survival, PSA nadir, and toxicity; the mean and median follow-up period was 43 months. RESULTS: Overall 5-year clinical and biochemical disease-free survival rates were 97% and 88%, respectively. Initial PSA level, stage, and post-treatment PSA nadir were independent prognostic variables for biochemical disease-free survival: a PSA nadir 0.5 ng/mL or less was associated with a 5-year biochemical disease-free survival rate of 98%, versus 88% and 42% for nadirs 0.51 to 1.0 and greater than 1.0 ng/mL, respectively. No severe treatment-related morbidity was seen. CONCLUSIONS: It appears that patients treated with conformal protons have 5-year biochemical disease-free survival rates comparable to those who undergo radical prostatectomy, and display no significant toxicity. A Phase III randomized dose-escalation trial is underway to define the optimum radiation dose for early-stage prostate cancer.     

High dose rate brachytherapy of localized prostate cancer

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the safety and efficacy of high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy using Iridium-192 (Ir 192) and 3D conformal external beam radiotherapy in patients with localized prostate cancer. METHODS: A total of 444 patients with localized prostate cancer underwent combined radiotherapy with interstitial Ir 192 and 3D conformal external beam radiotherapy between December 1992 and March 2001. The 230 patients, treated between December 1992 and December 1997 were analyzed. All patients underwent laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection to exclude patients with lymphatic involvement. Ir 192 was delivered twice with a 1-week interval in HDR remote control technique. The interstitial dose from December 1992 to December 1993 was 10Gy, after December 1993 the dose was reduced to 9Gy per treatment session. The interstitial application was followed by external beam radiation of 45Gy for cT1-cT2 and 50.4Gy for cT3 tumor (40Gy from December 1992 to December 1993). Progression was defined as biochemical failure according to ASTRO criteria, e.g. three consecutive PSA rises following the PSA nadir. RESULTS: The median PSA value decreased from 12.8 to 0.93ng/ml 12 months after treatment. Median PSA value was 0.47 after 24 months, 0.30ng/ml after 36 months and 0.18ng/ml after 60 months. 68% of the biopsies were negative 24 months after therapy. Progression-free rate was 100% for cT1 tumors, 75% for cT2 and 60% for stage-cT3 on 5-year follow-up. Five-year overall survival was 93%, 5-year disease-specific survival was 98%. Initial PSA value <10ng/ml, low stage and low grade were significantly related to 5-year progression-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: Combined HDR brachytherapy with Ir 192 is an alternative treatment option especially for patients with cT3 prostate cancer. Initial PSA value, stage and grade, are important prognostic factors.     

A new model using number of needles and androgen deprivation to predict chronic urinary toxicity for high or low dose rate prostate brachytherapy

PURPOSE: Prostate brachytherapy is an established treatment modality in early stage prostate cancer. We retrospectively reviewed our experience with low dose rate (LDR) and high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy as a single treatment modality for early prostate cancer with emphasis on chronic toxicity.MATERIALS AND METHODS: From June 1996 to August 2003, 253 patients with stage II prostate cancer, prostate specific antigen less than 12 and Gleason score less than 7 were treated with brachytherapy alone at our institution. A total of 92 patients underwent HDR brachytherapy with 192Ir, while 161 underwent LDR brachytherapy with 103Pd. HDR minimum prostate dose was 38 Gy, delivered in 4 fractions with a single implant during 36 hours. For HDR we used real-time dynamic 3-dimensional ultrasound base dosimetry. For 103Pd seed implants the dose was 120 Gy using selective peripheral weighted dose distribution. Treatment was given based on patient preference after pretreatment transrectal ultrasound. Toxicity was scored using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria 2.0. Median followup in all 253 cases was 2.9 years.RESULTS: In all patients the rate of 3-year urinary toxicity grade 2 or greater and grade 3 or greater was 26% and 6.9%, which was not significantly different between HDR and LDR (p = 0.3 and 0.4, respectively). However, grade 1 urogenital toxicity was lower for HDR (p = 0.002). The 3-year grade 2 rectal toxicity rate was 0.8% with no grade 3 or greater events, which was and similar in the HDR and LDR groups (1% and 0.6%, respectively). No cancer related deaths occurred and 4-year overall survival was 99% for HDR and 96.4% for LDR (p = 0.4). The 3-year American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology biochemical control rate was 90% for LDR and 93% for HDR. Cox multivariate analysis for grade 2 or greater urinary toxicity was significant for the use of 14 or greater needles (HR 6.1, p = 0.02) and hormonal therapy (HR 2.2, p = 0.02). In the absence of risk factors the 4-year grade 2 or greater urinary toxicity rate was 7% vs 65% if the 2 risk factors were present (p <0.001). Impotence crude rates were 18.3% for HDR and 41.3% for LDR (p = 0.002).CONCLUSIONS: HDR and LDR chronic urinary toxicity grade 2 or greater rates were equivalent. However, grade 1 was lower for HDR. The impotence rate was decrease by half with HDR. Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy and 14 or greater needles were significantly associated with increased chronic urinary toxicity on multivariate analysis.     

Biochemical outcome after high-dose-rate intensity modulated brachytherapy with external beam radiotherapy: 12 years of experience

Study Type – Therapy (case series) Level of Evidence 4 What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Biochemical control from series in which radical prostatectomy is performed for patients with unfavorable prostate cancer and/or low dose external beam radiation therapy are given remains suboptimal. The treatment regimen of HDR brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy is a safe and very effective treatment for patients with high risk localized prostate cancer with excellent biochemical control and low toxicity.

OBJECTIVE

• ? To investigate the long‐term oncological outcome, during the PSA era, of patients with prostate cancer who were treated using high‐dose‐rate (HDR) brachy therapy (BT) combined with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

• ? From June 1998 to April 2007, 313 patients with localized prostate cancer were treated with 46 Gy of EBRT to the pelvis with a HDR‐BT boost.
• ? The mean (median) follow‐up was 71 (68) months.
• ? Toxicity was reported according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Event, V.4.

RESULTS

• ? The 10‐year actuarial biochemical control was 100% for patients with no high‐risk criteria, 88% for patients with two intermediate‐risk criteria, 91% with one high‐risk criterion and 79% for patients with two to three high‐risk criteria (P= 0.004).
• ? The 10‐year cancer‐specific survival was 97% (standard deviation ±1%).
• ? The multivariate Cox regression analyses identified, Gleason score and T stage as independent prognostic factors for biochemical failure.
• ? Gleason score was the only factor to significantly affect distant metastases.
• ? Grade ≥3 late toxicity was not detected.

CONCLUSION

• ? The 10‐year results confirm the feasibility and effectiveness of EBRT with conformal HDR‐BT boost for patients with localised prostate cancer.

     

Prostate‐specific antigen relapse‐free survival and side‐effects in 734 patients with up to 10 years of follow‐up with localized prostate cancer treated by permanent 125iodine implants

Study Type – Therapy (case series)
Level of Evidence 4

OBJECTIVE

To report our analysis of the oncological outcome, side‐effects and complications after ¹²⁵I‐brachytherapy, based on 10 years of experience, as low dose‐rate (LDR) prostate brachytherapy is an accepted, effective and safe therapy for localized prostate cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between April 1999 and December 2006, 734 consecutive patients were treated with clinically localized prostate cancer with a follow‐up of ≥30 months. No patients received external beam radiotherapy and 43% received hormonal therapy before brachytherapy; this therapy was given for 3–4 months. All patients had LDR prostate brachytherapy administered by one radiation oncologist. Biochemical failure was defined according to the ‘Phoenix consensus’.

RESULTS

The median follow‐up for the 734 patients was 55 months; 26 had a clinical relapse and 11 died from prostate cancer; 20 patients died from other illnesses. The 10‐year actuarial biochemical control was 92%, 84% and 65%, respectively (P < 0.001) for the low‐, intermediate‐ and high‐risk groups. Multivariate Cox regression analyses identified Gleason score and prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) level as independent prognostic factors for biochemical failure. The actuarial biochemical control with Gleason score was 88%, 76% and 67% for patients with a Gleason score of ≤6, 7 and >7, respectively (P < 0.001). The biochemical control was 90%, 80% and 42% for patients with a PSA level of ≤10, 10.1–20 and >20 ng/mL, respectively (P < 0.001). No patients reported incontinence after treatment. There was acute urinary retention in 22 (2.9%) patients. Logistic regression showed that the most significant factors correlating with the probability of catheterization were the pretreatment prostate volume and hormonal therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The excellent long‐term results and low morbidity, and the many advantages of prostate brachytherapy over other treatments, show that brachytherapy is an effective treatment for clinically organ‐confined prostate cancer.     

Improved biochemical disease-free survival of men younger than 60 years with prostate cancer treated with high dose conformal external beam radiotherapy

PURPOSE: We report the long-term prostate specific antigen relapse-free survival rates and predictors of biochemical outcome for patients 60 years or younger with prostate cancer treated with high dose conformal external beam radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 740 patients with prostate cancer treated with 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy or intensity modulated external beam radiotherapy. Patients who also received androgen deprivation therapy were excluded from this analysis. Median radiation dose was 75.6 Gy and median followup was 88 months with a minimum followup of 24 months. Median followup for patients 60 years or younger in this report was 54 months (range 24 to 132). Biochemical failure was defined according to the criteria recommended by the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology Consensus Panel. RESULTS: Biochemical failure developed in 20 (21%) of the 96 men 60 years or younger, which was similar to the 22% failure rate observed in 644 patients older than 60. The 5 and 7-year biochemical disease-free survival rates were 82% and 79% in younger men, and 79% and 78% in older men, respectively (p = 0.48). For younger patients who received 81 Gy or greater, the 7-year prostate specific antigen relapse-free survival rates for favorable, intermediate and unfavorable risk patients were 96%, 87% and 50%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that among patients 60 years or younger the most important predictor of biochemical relapse was radiation doses less than 75.6 Gy followed by Gleason score greater than 7. CONCLUSIONS: Men with prostate cancer 60 years or younger treated with high dose radiotherapy have an excellent biochemical outcome and fare as well as older patients. The use of conventional dose levels in patients 60 years or younger was associated with an 8-fold increase in the biochemical relapse rate and these doses should not be considered appropriate for the treatment of localized prostate cancer.     

Matched-cohort analysis of patients with prostate cancer followed with observation or treated with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy

OBJECTIVES: To compare the outcome of similar patients with prostate cancer treated by either observation or three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3-DCRT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 69 patients with nonmetastatic prostate cancer who were observed only; the indications included indolent disease, significant medical comorbidities and refusal of treatment. Of these, 62 patients had palpable T1-T2a and seven T2b-T3a disease, a median Gleason score of 6 and a median initial prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of 5.3 ng/mL. A matched-cohort analysis of 69 patients, based on palpation T category, Gleason score and initial PSA, was used to compare the outcome between the observation and 3-DCRT groups. The median radiation dose for latter was 72 Gy. RESULTS: The median follow-up for the observed patients was 49 months. The 5- and 8-year actuarial rates of freedom from distant metastases were 100% and 93%, respectively, and the actuarial overall survival rates 94% and 73%, respectively. Seven observed patients had local disease progression on physical examination. Four patients who initially were observed received radiation therapy later for a rising PSA and/or local disease progression. For the 69 matched 3-DCRT patients, the overall 5-year rate for no biochemically evident disease was 74%. The respective 5- and 8-year actuarial rates of freedom from distant metastases were 95% and 95%, and actuarial overall survival rates 95% and 75%. There were no significant differences in distant metastasis and overall survival rates between the groups, and no deaths from prostate cancer in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Observation is a reasonable alternative to treatment in selected patients. During the 5-year follow-up the progression rates were relatively low, and there was no difference in distant metastasis or overall survival between the groups. As the follow-up was short a longer follow-up is needed to determine whether the outcome of those patients who chose observation will remain comparable to that in those undergoing immediate 3-DCRT.