Selecting a physical medicine and rehabilitation residency.

A 35-item questionnaire, designed to assess the relative importance of various factors to medical students when ranking physical medicine and rehabilitation (PM&R) residency training programs during the Match, was sent to all members of the 1991 senior class after Match Day. This mailing was coordinated with the National Resident Matching Program. The questionnaire was also sent to all PM&R residency training program directors and all physiatrist faculty members at the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey--New Jersey Medical School (UMDNJ-NJMS). Recipients were asked to grade selection factors based on a numerical scale: 1, extremely important; 2, very important; 3, important; 4, minimally important; 5, not important. A response rate of 41% (73/179) for medical students, 87% (62/71) for residency training directors and 71% (22/31) for UMDNJ-NJMS faculty members was attained. Analysis of the results indicates that, overall, there is no significant difference in ranking of the factors by each of the three groups surveyed. The intergroup responses for one-third of the factors were significantly different. Diversity of the training experience, current house officer satisfaction, it "feels" right and house officer quality were the four most important selection factors to the medical students.     

Academic productivity in physical medicine and rehabilitation.

Academic productivity of faculty members in physical medicine and rehabilitation (PM&R) was evaluated retrospectively by using the numbers of scientific publications as a measurement instrument. This study was completed by examining ten medical peer-reviewed journals that regularly included original articles in the specialty area of PM&R during the years 1988 through 1990. The number of articles was weighted according to the specific journal's impact on the Science Citation Index. Academic productivity of physiatric departments showed wide variation. Ten units published at least 20 articles during the 3-yr period. Eight departments achieved a ratio of at least one article per faculty member based on reports from the Association of American Medical Colleges. Further study will be needed to assess the factors underlying these wide variations in departments' productivity.     

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: potential effects on physical medicine and rehabilitation

The objective was to review pertinent areas of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) to determine the PPACA's impact on physical medicine and rehabilitation (PM&R). The law, and related newspaper and magazine articles, was reviewed. The ways in which provisions in the PPACA are being implemented by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and other government organizations were investigated. Additionally, recent court rulings on the PPACA were analyzed to assess the law's chances of successful implementation. The PPACA contains a variety of reforms that, if implemented, will significantly impact the field of PM&R. Many PPACA reforms change how rehabilitative care is delivered by integrating different levels of care and creating uniform quality metrics to assess quality and efficiency. These quality metrics will ultimately be tied to new, performance-based payment systems. While the law contains ambitious initiatives that may, if unsuccessful or incorrectly implemented, negatively impact PM&R, it also has the potential to greatly improve the quality and efficiency of rehabilitative care. A proactive approach to the changes the PPACA will bring about is essential for the health of the field.     

Oncology and physical medicine and rehabilitation

IntroductionCancer patients are living longer with deficiencies and functional impairments requiring often typically a care in physical medicine and rehabilitation (PMR).ObjectiveTo examine the care of cancer patients in PMR.MethodInvestigation made with a questionnaire diffused from the e-mail listing of the Société Française de Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation.ResultsSixty-seven answers received. Fifty-seven centers take care of cancer patients. On average, 4% of cancer patients are hospitalised in PMR. Spinal cord injuries and hemiplegias are the most common impairments. Forty-two percent of the PMR units take the patients in all the stages of cancer treatment. Working relationships between PMR and oncology units are formalized only eight times out of 52. In case of health degradation, relationships with a palliative care unit are frequent but not generalized. Eighty-five percent of the centers think that PMR is not enough developed in oncology.ConclusionsIn spite of its limited character, this investigation shows that the PMR units take these patients. Situations where PMR has an important role in the follow-up of cancer patients are multiple and publications have showed its interest, especially on the limitations of activities. It is important to make better known the interest of PMR in oncology units but also to develop specific care within PMR units.     

Neural network applications in physical medicine and rehabilitation.

The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of neural networks and their applications in physical medicine and rehabilitation. Conventional statistical models may present certain limitations that can be overcome by neural networks. We show what neural networks are, how they "learn" regularities from the data, and how they can classify previously unseen cases. We present advantages and disadvantages of using neural networks and compare them with regression models. We explain how neural networks can be used as statistical tools for making inferences using the example of a prognostic model that predicts ambulation after spinal cord injury.     

Women in physical medicine and rehabilitation. Leadership issues

Academic medical centers share the triple missions of education, research, and clinical care, particularly in vulnerable populations. They are well positioned to have a significant impact on reducing health disparities between patients from diverse backgrounds, both now and in future generations. A key component to realizing this goal lies in increasing the number of women in academic medicine. Women bring a fresh perspective to the investigative process, often targeting gender is a better way of providing preventive services, and patient satisfaction studies have shown that many patients prefer women physicians.     

Current status of chairpersons in physical medicine and rehabilitation.

There are currently 77 academic departments, divisions or units of physical medicine and rehabilitation (PM&R) in the United States. The authors conducted a survey to develop a profile of the current chairpersons of PM&R, as well as to assess the short- and long-term needs of the field. The survey addressed basic demographic information as well as the level of formal training and/or experience in various management, patient care and academic areas. The level of satisfaction with various aspects of the position such as workload, relationship with the university and role as a researcher were also measured. The chairpersons were asked when they plan to vacate their position and if they felt there were any members of their faculty who are qualified and ready to assume a chairperson position. Those that identified a qualified individual were then asked whether the person had formal training and/or experience in the various management, patient care and academic areas. The results indicate that, although the chairpersons have a high level of job satisfaction with respect to the challenge of the position and their administrative and supervisory roles, they are least satisfied with their role as a researcher. The field must be concerned with this finding, because academic PM&R units in the United States will experience a substantial change in leadership by the end of the 20th century. Approximately 39% of the current chairpersons who returned the questionnaire are planning to step down by 1999, with an additional 37% unsure when they will vacate the position.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Robotic technology and physical medicine and rehabilitation

In this opinion piece, I will revisit the basis for our belief that robotic manipulation is a valid approach to promote speedier and better recovery following a stroke and discuss some of the clinical evidence that led to the September 2010 guidelines for stroke care of the American Heart Association as well as the December 2010 guidelines of the Veterans Administration endorsing the use of robotic technology for the upper extremity (UE) but not for the lower extremity (LE) post-stroke rehabilitation effort.