开放式完全腹腔内修补治疗巨大腹壁切口疝10例

目的探讨用Gore—Tex补片开放式完全腹腔内修补治疗巨大腹壁切口疝的疗效。方法用Gore．Tex补片开放式完全腹腔内修补治疗巨大腹壁切口疝10例，其中初发切口疝9例，复发切口疝1例。结果9例一期愈合，1例发生创面局限性积液，经穿刺负压引流处理后治愈，随访10个月至2年，无复发病例。结论用Gore—Tex补片开放式完全腹腔内修补治疗巨大腹壁切口疝经济，安全，有效，感染风险降低。     

Bard Composix补片修补巨大切口疝临床应用

目的 总结应用Bard Composix补片修补4例巨大切口疝的临床经验。方法 使用美国巴德公司的Composix补片对4例巨大腹壁切口疝进行修补术治疗。结果 4例病人均无并发症,随访1～11个月无复发。结论 Composix补片修补巨大切口疝具有安全、创伤小、恢复快的优点,是治疗切口疝的理想术式。     

应用补片修补巨大腹壁切口疝26例报告

目的 总结补片修补巨大腹壁切口疝的临床经验。方法回顾性分析2001年6月至2005年5月上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院诊治的26例巨大腹壁切口疝的临床资料。结果26例均痊愈出院．无心肺衰竭等严重并发症。无复发。结论补片修补术是治疗巨大腹壁切口疝的理想方法。     

双层聚丙烯补片在腹壁切口疝修补中的应用

目的探讨应用人工合成材料双层聚丙烯补片修补腹壁切口疝的效果。方法 21例腹壁切口疝（15例大切口疝和及6例巨大切口疝）患者采用双层聚丙烯补片行无张力修补,对术中及术后情况进行分析。结果全组病例手术顺利,手术时间87～189min,平均123min。无严重并发症发生,痊愈出院。术后随访5～36个月（平均17个月）,无复发病例。结论双层聚丙烯补片修补中下腹壁大切口疝及巨大切口疝是一种安全、有效的方法 ,是临床上治疗切口疝可供选择的一种手术方式。     

应用补片修补巨大腹壁切口疝23例报告

目的 总结应用补片无张力修补巨大腹壁切口疝经验.方法 回顾性分析2000年6月至2009年8月间收治的23例巨大腹壁切口疝病人的临床资料.结果 23例均用补片进行修补,其中14例采用聚丙烯Marlex网片,9例采用Composix复合补片,术后无严重并发症发生,随访5～48个月无复发.结论 掌握正确的修补方法 正确选择...     

单丝聚丙烯补片修补老年腹壁巨大切口疝治疗体会

目的 分析应用单丝聚丙烯补片修补老年腹壁巨大切口疝的治疗效果.方法 采集2006年1月至2009年12月我院老年巨大切口疝患者36例,使用单丝聚丙烯补片修补,其中肌鞘前修补(Onlay法)12例,肌肉与肌肉间修补(Inlay法)5例,肌肉后腹膜前修补(Sublay法)19例.结果 无切口感染,皮下积液6例,均为Onlay法,9例有不同程度异物感,但不妨碍日常生活.平均随访24个月,无复发.结论 应用单丝聚丙烯补片无张力修补老年腹壁巨大切口疝,可取得满意疗效,采用妥善的术中、术后处理方法,可减少术后并发症的发生.     

腹壁切口疝无张力修补24例临床体会

目的探讨腹壁切口疝的病因及应用补片无张力修补腹壁切口疝。方法回顾性分析应用人工合成材料无张力修补腹壁切口疝的手术治疗情况。结果 24例均治愈,随访6个月至1年无复发。结论应用人工合成材料补片无张力修补治疗腹壁切口疝是一种安全、有效、可靠的治疗方法。     

复合切口疝补片修补腹壁巨大切口疝30例分析

目的 分析应用聚丙烯和聚四氟乙烯复合切口疝补片修补腹壁巨大切口疝的临床效果，讨论应用复合补片的手术方法和经验体会。方法 1999年5月～2005年5月应用复合切口疝补片修补腹壁巨大切口疝30例，其中皮下置片法12例，腹腔内法18例。平均随访期36个月。结果 术后复发2例，占6．7％。切口并发症33．3％，切口感染5例，均为皮下法；皮下积液5例，其中皮下法3例，腹腔内法2例。结论 腹壁巨大切口疝，特别是传统法难以修补的，可应用聚丙烯和聚四氟乙烯复合补片修补。应用腹腔内法及正确的术中、术后处理可减少术后并发症的发生。     

腹腔镜下腹壁巨大切口疝修补术的临床应用

目的探讨腹腔镜下应用补片修补巨大腹壁切口疝的手术方法及临床效果。方法分析25例应用腹腔镜下补片修补腹壁巨大切口疝(腹壁缺损长径为12~25cm,宽9~18cm,缺损面积108~451cm2)患者的临床资料。结果21例(84.0%)顺利完成腹腔镜下腹壁切口疝修补术,4例(16.0%)因肠管与腹壁粘连紧密而中转开腹。手术时间78~186(平均95)min。术后住院5~8d,平均6.5d。术后疼痛达3个月以上8例(32.0%),经治疗后缓解;浆液肿9例(36%)。无切口感染和肠瘘发生;无手术死亡。全组患者随访6~25(平均11)个月,无切口疝复发。结论腹腔镜下修补腹壁巨大切口疝是一种安全、有效的方法,对腹腔粘连重分离困难者应及时中转开腹。     

应用补片修补巨大腹壁切口疝26例临床分析

目的总结补片修补巨大腹壁切口疝患者的临床经验。方法回顾性分析2001年6月，2005年5月经我院诊治的26例巨大腹壁切口疝患者的临床资料。结果26例均痊愈出院，无心肺衰竭等严重并发症，随访3-6个月无复发。结论补片修补术是治疗巨大腹壁切口疝的理想方法。     

巨大腹壁切口疝的补片修补治疗(附23例报告)

目的：总结临床治疗巨大腹壁切口疝的经验和方法。方法：回顾性分析23例巨大腹壁切口疝病人的年龄，手术方法，引流放置，抗生素应用及预后。结果：发生巨大腹壁切口疝平均年龄是65．3％，均采用人工合成材料进行修补，术后放置引流，并使用预防性抗生素。治愈21例，复发2例。结论：常见于老年病人腹部手术后巨大腹壁切口疝，可使用人工合成材料进行修补，并获得良好疗效。     

补片修补腹壁切口疝的临床应用

目的探讨腹壁切口疝的治疗。方法回顾性分析150例腹壁切口疝患者的临床资料。（1）肌腱膜上补片置入手术（ONLAY）126例；（2）筋膜前（腹膜前）、肌下补片置入手术（SUBLAY）4例；（3）缺损处直接补片置入途径（INLAY）13例；（4）腹膜腔内补片置入术（Introperitonealsite）7例。结果平均年龄58．5岁，女性占52．5％。上腹部切口36％，下腹部切口占64％。全部采用合成材料修补。聚丙烯材料130例，聚四氟乙烯-聚丙烯双面材料16例，强生Proceed补片4例，开腹手术143例，腹腔镜手术7例。复发3例，手术复发率为2％。结论ONLAY手术安全可靠，复发率低，是可以接受的切口疝修补方法，避免伤口感染，防治腹内压升高，促进伤口愈合，保证缝合质量是预防切口疝关键。     

运用人工合成材料治疗腹壁巨大切口疝体会

目的总结临床治疗巨大腹壁切口疝的经验和体会。方法回顾性分析20例巨大切口疝患者的临床资料。结果19例痊愈出院,无心肺衰竭等严重并发症,1例复发。结论常见于老年患者腹部手术后的腹壁巨大切口疝,可使用人工材料进行修补,疗效良好。     

Abdominal lipectomy and mesh repair of midline periumbilical hernia after bariatric surgery: How to spare the umbilicus

Background: Abdominal lipectomy is becoming an increasingly common surgical procedure in patients with esthetic deformities resulting from massive weight loss induced by bariatric surgery. Sometimes a midline incisional hernia coexists with the pendulus abdomen. Herein presented is a technique to perform a retromuscular mesh repair of the incisional hernia while sparing the umbilicus. Methods: The abdominal lipectomy with concomitant retro-muscular mesh repair of a midline incisional hernia is done sparing the vascular supply of the umbilicus on one side only. Results: 5 consecutive women with pendulus abdomen resulting from bariatric surgery-induced massive weight loss and concomitant midline incisional hernia underwent abdominal lipectomy and incisional hernia mesh repair. Mean BMI was 28.6 kg/m² (range 26–35), one patient was a smoker, and another had type 2 diabetes requiring oral hypoglycemic agents. Two patients had had a previous incisional hernia repair with intraperitoneal mesh. One patient had partial necrosis of the umbilicus and another experienced necrosis of only the epidermis that recovered fully. Conclusions: The umbilicus can be safely spared during abdominal lipectomy with concomitant midline incisional hernia mesh repair. Recurrent incisional hernia and common risk factors for wound healing such as diabetes and obesity increase the risk of umbilical necrosis.     

腹横肌松解术在腹壁巨大切口疝修补中的临床应用

目的探讨腹横肌松解术（transversus abdominis muscle release,TAR）在治疗腹壁巨大切口疝中的临床效果。 方法回顾性分析2016年1月至2017年8月,杭州市第一人民医院集团收治的25例腹壁巨大切口疝患者的临床资料。 结果25例腹壁巨大切口疝患者中,其中男性16例,女性9例。平均年龄（65.0±11.4）岁,体质量指数（body mass index,BMI）为（31.15±5.83）kg/m²。平均腹壁缺损宽度（11.40±1.36）cm。22例为中线切口疝,3例为侧方切口疝。4例为复发性切口疝。所有患者均采用TAR＋后组织结构分离技术进行腹壁功能性重建,并采用肌后补片加强修补的手术方式。手术时间（152.0±31.6）min,术中出血量（116.8±44.1）cm³,住院时间（13.9±2.9） d。术后有2例出现浅表手术部位感染,4例Ⅲ型血清肿,1例不完全机械性肠梗阻,均经非手术治疗后治愈。无补片感染、肠瘘等并发症。随访期间未发现有复发、腹壁膨出病例。 结论腹横肌松解术＋后组织结构分离术是腹壁巨大切口疝治疗一种有效、安全的手术修补方法。     

腹壁切口疝临床分析（附130例报告）

目的　探讨腹壁切口疝的病因和治疗。方法　回顾性分析 1 30例腹壁切口疝病人临床资料。结果　平均年龄 6 2 .8岁 ,女性占 5 8.5 %。术后一年内发病占 5 6 .2 % ,五年后发病占 2 6 .9%。纵型切口占 85 .4 % ,下腹部切口占 6 6 .9%。切口二期愈合者为 4 4 .6 %。 5 6例合成材料修补手术复发率为 7.1 %。结论　伤口二期愈合、腹内压升高、肥胖和糖尿病、老年人、女性、纵型切口、下腹部切口等是腹壁切口疝的致病因素 ;避免伤口感染 ,防治腹内压升高 ,促进伤口愈合 ,保证缝合质量是预防切口疝关键 ;大切口疝需使用合成材料修补 ,做好围手术期处理 ,可减少复发     

The feasibility of adopting laparoscopic incisional hernia repair in general surgery practice: early outcomes in an unselected series of patients

A laparoscopic approach to incisional hernia repair has been shown to be safe and effective in selected patients. We report our early outcomes following laparoscopic ventral/incisional hernia repair (LVHR) in an unselected series of patients encountered in general surgery practice. All patients referred with incisional hernia were offered a laparoscopic repair using prosthetic mesh. Patients were not excluded from laparoscopic approach on the basis of age, previous surgery, defect size, intraperitoneal mesh, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, or abdominal wall stomas. We followed 28 consecutive patients who underwent LVHR (17 primary, 11 recurrent hernias). Laparoscopic repair was completed in 27 patients with a mean operative time of 141.6 +/- 11.9 minutes. There were no intraoperative complications. The mean size of the abdominal wall defects was 153.4 +/- 27.5 cm and the mean mesh size was 349.2 +/- 59.1 cm. The mean hospital stay was 3.7 +/- 0.3 days. Nine patients developed large wound seromas; all spontaneously resolved. Our experience suggests that LVHR is feasible as a primary approach to most incisional hernias encountered in general surgery practice.     

Repair of giant incisional abdominal wall hernias using open intraperitoneal mesh

Background Very large and complex incisional hernias, especially those involving loss of abdominal wall, present a particular challenge to the surgeon. Aims The open intraperitoneal technique was used prospectively for the repair of incisional hernias in a selected group of patients with large defects, often those with major loss of abdominal wall, overweight patients, and previous failures of incisional repair. Materials and methods Between 1 January 1999 and 31 December 2005, out of 275 patients operated on for incisional hernia repair, 61 of them, most of whom were obese with multiorificial recurrent or giant hernias and contraindicated for laparoscopy, were treated using an open intraperitoneal mesh technique. There were 50 females and 11 males, with a mean age of 61. The median ASA score of the group was 2.3, with a mean BMI of 34 kg/m² and a mean hernia surface of 182 cm². Sixty-four percent of the patients had undergone one or more previous incisional hernia repairs. Results Mean operating time was 130 min, with an average hospital stay of 13 days. None of the patients died. Postoperative complications occurred in 21% of the patients; most of which were minor, but two cases (3.3%) developed deep abscesses requiring surgery and removal of the mesh. A recurrence rate of 5% was found after a mean follow-up of 35 months (8–88). Conclusion Open intraperitoneal mesh repair appears to be a good option for the treatment of complex incisional hernia (at least 10 cm in diameter or multiorificial) in obese patients contraindicated for laparoscopy.     

Incisional hernia treatment with progressive pneumoperitoneum and retromuscular prosthetic hernioplasty

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Major incisional hernias of the abdominal wall often pose a serious surgical problem. The choice between simple suture repair and mesh repair remains uncertain. METHODS: Seventy-seven patients underwent surgery to repair large abdominal incisional hernias, i.e., with parietal defects of 10 cm or more, by retromuscular prosthetic hernioplasty between 1996 and 1999. All patients were treated preoperatively by progressive pneumoperitoneum and were followed up for 2-5 years (mean 38.3 months). RESULTS: Almost all patients tolerated the pneumoperitoneum; no postoperative death occurred. Six patients developed a subcutaneous infection but none of them required removal of the mesh. Two patients (2.6%) had recurrent incisional hernia. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that pneumoperitoneum is useful in preparing patients for incisional hernioplasty. Retromuscular mesh repair represents an appropriate surgical procedure, particularly in view of its low rate of recurrence.     

腹腔镜修补多发性腹壁切口疝

目的 探讨腹腔镜修补多发腹壁切口疝的手术方法和应用价值。方法 2008年2月首都医科大学宣武医院普外科收治1例腹部三次手术后共造成腹部四处切口疝的复杂病例,切口疝长径分别为12、9、6及3cm。采用疝修补缝合钉固定腹腔内大面积复合补片,行腹腔镜修补术。结果 腹腔镜一次修补4个腹壁切口疝手术成功,无肠管损伤等并发症,术后随访6个月无腹壁切口疝复发。结论 腹腔镜多发腹壁切口疝修补术安全、有效。在开腹手术中暴露多个缺损的难点,在腹腔镜手术中难度大大降低。腹腔镜多发腹壁切口疝修补术不但具有微创优势,而且更能发挥其技术优势。