Chemoradiation with raltitrexed and oxaliplatin in preoperative treatment of stage II-III resectable rectal cancer: Phase I and II studies

PURPOSE: Two separate studies were conducted, the first to evaluate the maximal tolerated dose and the second the efficacy of raltitrexed plus oxaliplatin in conjunction with preoperative chemoradiation in patients with resectable T3 rectal carcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 48 patients received radiotherapy (50 Gy) administered to the posterior pelvis 5 d/wk for 5 weeks. Combination raltitrexed (3 mg/m(2)) and oxaliplatin (60 to 130 mg/m(2)) was administered on Days 1, 19, and 38. RESULTS: The recommended dose of oxaliplatin is 130 mg/m(2) (maximal tolerated dose not reached). No patients developed Grade 4 acute toxicity. Grade 3 acute toxicity occurred in 9 patients (18.7%). It was hematologic in 1 patient and GI in 1 patient; 7 patients had an asymptomatic increase of transaminase. Surgery was performed in 47 (98%) of 48 patients. Of the 47 patients, 42 underwent sphincter-saving surgery; in 19, the tumor at diagnosis was located <30 mm from the anorectal ring. Chemoradiation in combination with raltitrexed and oxaliplatin produced high rates of tumor response. The overall tumor downstaging rate was 73% for T and N stages. A complete pathologic tumor response (pT0) or microscopic tumor foci (pTmic) was observed in 28 patients. The tumor regression grade (TRG), using the Mandard scoring system, was TRG1 in 16 patients (43.2%), TRG2 in 12 (32.4%), TRG3 in 12 (32.4%), TRG4 in 6 (16.2%), and TRG5 in 1 patient (2.7%). CONCLUSION: Raltitrexed plus oxaliplatin combined with pelvic radiotherapy was effective and well tolerated in patients with resectable T3 rectal carcinoma.     

Preoperative Chemoradiation for Extraperitoneal T3 Rectal Cancer: Acute Toxicity, Tumor Response, and Sphincter Preservation

Purpose: To evaluate whether or not an intermediate dose of preoperative external radiation therapy intensified by systemic chemotherapy could improve the tumor response, sphincter preservation, and tumor control.

Methods and Materials: Between March 1990 and December 1995, 83 consecutive patients with resectable extraperitoneal adenocarcinoma of the rectum were treated with preoperative chemoradiation: bolus i.v. mitomycin C (MMC), 10 mg/m², Day 1 plus 24-h continuous infusion i.v. 5-fluorouracil (5FU) 1000 mg/m², Days 1–4, and concurrent external beam radiotherapy (37.8 Gy). All but 2 patients had T3 disease. Surgery was performed 4–6 weeks after the end of chemoradiation.

Results: Total Grade 3–4 acute toxicity during chemoradiation was observed in 11 (13%) patients: hematological Grade 3 toxicity was recorded in 8 (10%) patients, and Grade 4 toxicity was recorded in 2 (2%) patients. Grade 3 diarrhea was seen in 2 (2%) patients. No patient had major skin or urological acute toxicity. Two patients had no surgery: 1 died before surgery from septic complications after Grade 4 hematological toxicity; 1 refused surgery and is still alive after 6 years. There was no postoperative mortality and the overall perioperative morbidity rate was 25%. The analysis of tumor response involved 81 patients. Overall, 9% [7] of 81 patients had a complete pathologic response. Comparing the stage at the diagnostic workup with the pathologic stage, tumor downstaging was observed in 46 (57%) patients. We had 7 (9%) pT0, 5 (6%) pT1, 33 (41%) pT2, and 36 (44%) pT3. Nodal status downstaging was detected in 46 patients (57%). No evidence of nodal involvement was observed in 59 patients (73%). The incidence of tumor response was affected significantly by the number of quarters of rectal circumference involved (p = 0.03) and, marginally, by the length of the tumor (p = 0.09). The distance between the lower pole of the tumor and the anorectal ring had no influence. Of the patients, 63 (78%) had a sphincter-saving surgical procedure. In 12 (44%) of 27 patients candidate for an APR, the sphincter was preserved, as it was in 19 (95%) of 20 probable candidates. Lengthening of the distance between the anorectal ring and the lower pole of the tumor > 20 mm was observed in 21 patients (26%). Of 63 patients, 4 (6%) had moderate soilage after the sphincter-saving procedure.

Conclusion: Preoperative combined modality therapy seems to afford some potential advantages in nonrandomized trials: patients are able to tolerate higher chemotherapy doses and they experience a lower acute toxicity. Tumor downstaging and resectability rates are high; sphincter preservation is feasible. Larger T3 tumors remained less influenced by this treatment; thus, taking into account the low toxicity rate recorded, a more aggressive schedule should be applied in these resectable tumors.     

Importance of tumor regression assessment in predicting the outcome in patients with locally advanced rectal carcinoma who are treated with preoperative radiotherapy

BACKGROUND: Locally advanced rectal carcinoma has a poor prognosis. However, since the introduction of preoperative radiotherapy, the outcome of patients with rectal carcinoma has been reported to have improved. Nevertheless, to the authors' knowledge few data are available regarding the histopathologic response to radiotherapy as assessed on surgical specimens as a potential predictive factor for outcome. METHODS: To estimate the effect of radiotherapy on rectal carcinoma, the authors retrospectively reviewed the surgical specimens of 102 patients with T3-4, N0 or > or = N1 rectal carcinoma and 1 patient with T2 but N1 rectal carcinoma. All patients were treated preoperatively with a hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy schedule in a prospective protocol (Trial 93-01). Using a standardized approach, tumor regression was graded using a system that varies from Grade 1 (tumor regression Grade [TRG] 1) when complete tumor regression is observed to Grade 5 (TRG5) when no tumor regression is observed. RESULTS: Radiotherapy resulted in tumor downstaging in 43% of the patients. There were 2 pT1 tumors (2%), 21 pT2 tumors (20%), 66 pT3 tumors (64%), and 14 pT4 tumors (14%) after treatment. Regional lymph nodes were involved in 55 patients (53%). None of the patients demonstrated a complete tumor regression after radiotherapy, but in 79% of the specimens a partial tumor regression was observed (TRG1: 0%; TRG2: 20%; TRG3: 39%; TRG4: 20%; and TRG5: 21%). The median actuarial overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were 52 months. Actuarial local recurrence rates at 2 years and 5 years were 6.4% and 7.6%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed the actuarial DFS to be significantly lower in patients with lymph node metastases (P = 0.0004) and advanced pT stages (pT3-4) (P = 0.03). A favorable outcome for OS, DFS, and local control was observed in patients with TRG2-4 (i.e., responders) compared with patients with TRG5 (i.e., nonresponders), but also in patients with low residual tumor cell density (TRG2, 3, and 4). On multivariate analysis, TRG remained an independent prognostic indicator for local tumor control. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor regression as well as residual tumor cell density were found to be predictive factors of survival in rectal carcinoma patients after preoperative radiotherapy. Even after preoperative radiotherapy, the pathologic stage of the surgical specimen remained a prognostic factor. The use of a standardized approach for pathologic evaluation must be implemented to allow comparison between the results of various treatment approaches.     

Preoperative chemoradiation with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil for extraperitoneal T3 rectal cancer: acute toxicity, tumor response, sphincter preservation

Purpose: To evaluate the impact of preoperative external radiation therapy intensified by systemic chemotherapy including bolus cisplatin (c-DDP) and 4-day infusional 5-fluorouracil (PLAFUR-4) on tumor response and sphincter preservation in patients with extraperitoneal T3 rectal cancer with acceptable toxicity, and to compare the results to our previous experience with bolus mitomycin c (MMC) and 4-day infusion 5-FU (FUMIR).

Methods and Materials: Between October 1995 and March 1998, 40 consecutive patients with resectable extraperitoneal adenocarcinoma of the rectum were treated with preoperative chemoradiation: slow infusion iv c-DDP, 60 mg/m², day 1 and 29 plus 24-h continuous infusion iv 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 1000 mg/m², days 1–4 and 29–32, and concurrent external beam radiotherapy (45 Gy whole pelvis followed by 5.4 Gy boost). All but 3 patients had T3 disease. Surgery was performed 6–8 weeks after the end of chemoradiation.

Results: No patient had Grade 4 acute toxicity. Grade 3 hematological toxicity was observed only in 2 (5%) patients. No patient had major gastrointestinal, skin, or urological acute toxicity. All patients had radical surgery. There was no perioperative mortality; perioperative morbidity rate was 12%. Overall, 23% (9 of 40) of patients had a complete pathological response and 10% (4 of 40) of patients had rare isolated residual cancer cells (Tmic). Comparing the stage at the diagnostic workup with the pathological stage, tumor downstaging was observed in 27 (68%) patients; nodal status downstaging was detected in 24 (60%) patients. Thirty-four (85%) patients had a sphincter-saving surgical procedure. In 4 of 10 (40%) patients who were definitive candidates for an abdominoperineal resection (APR), the sphincter was preserved, as it was in 13 of 13 (100%) probable candidates. Lengthening of the distance between the anorectal ring and the lower pole of the tumor ≥ 20 mm was observed in 9 (23%) patients. None of the patients had soilage after the sphincter-saving procedure. In our previous experience with FUMIR the complete pathological response was 9%, the sphincter-saving surgical procedure was performed in 66% cases, and the Grade 3+ toxicity was observed in 13% of patients.

Conclusions: The addition of c-DDP to 5-FU (PLAFUR-4) in a neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy schedule improved the pathological response rate in comparison with our previous experience. Toxicity was low indeed, thus we commenced another study adding one more day of 5-FU infusion (PLAFUR-5) to further improve our results.     

Preoperative chemoradiation using oral capecitabine in locally advanced rectal cancer

PURPOSE: Capecitabine (Xeloda) is a new orally administered fluoropyrimidine carbamate that was rationally designed to exert its effect by tumor-selective activation. We attempted to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of preoperative chemoradiation using capecitabine in locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between July 1999 and March 2001, 45 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (cT3/T4 or N+) were treated with preoperative chemoradiation. Radiation of 45 Gy/25 fractions was delivered to the pelvis, followed by a 5.4 Gy/3 fractions boost to the primary tumor. Chemotherapy was administered concurrent with radiotherapy and consisted of 2 cycles of 14-day oral capecitabine (1650 mg/m(2)/day) and leucovorin (20 mg/m(2)/day), each of which was followed by a 7-day rest period. Surgery was performed 6 weeks after the completion of chemoradiation. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients received definitive surgery. Primary tumor and node downstaging occurred in 63% and 90% of patients, respectively. The overall downstaging rate, including both primary tumor and nodes, was 84%. A pathologic complete response was achieved in 31% of patients. Twenty-one patients had tumors located initially 5 cm or less from the anal verge; among the 18 treated with surgery, 72% received sphincter-preserving surgery. No Grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicities developed. Other Grade 3 toxicities were as follows: hand-foot syndrome (7%), fatigue (4%), diarrhea (4%), and radiation dermatitis (2%). CONCLUSION: These preliminary results suggest that preoperative chemoradiation with capecitabine is a safe, well-tolerated, and effective neoadjuvant treatment modality for locally advanced rectal cancer. In addition, this preoperative treatment has a considerable downstaging effect on the tumor and can increase the possibility of sphincter preservation in distal rectal cancer.     

Randomized, multicenter, phase IIb study of preoperative chemoradiotherapy in T3 mid-distal rectal cancer: raltitrexed + oxaliplatin + radiotherapy versus cisplatin + 5-fluorouracil + radiotherapy

PURPOSE: To prospectively compare the rates of pathologic response, acute toxicity, and sphincter preservation with two different schedules of preoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with cT3 mid-distal rectal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with cT3 and/or N+ resectable rectal carcinoma were randomized to receive one of the two following chemoradiotherapy regimens: cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and radiotherapy (PLAFUR) or raltitrexed, oxaliplatin, and radiotherapy (TOMOX-RT). For PLAFUR, cisplatin (60 mg/m(2)) was given on Days 1 and 29, with a prolonged infusion of 5-fluorouracil (1,000 mg/m(2)) on Days 1-4 and 29-32, plus concurrent radiotherapy (50.4 Gy in 1.8-Gy fractions daily). For TOMOX-RT, raltitrexed (3 mg/m(2)) and oxaliplatin (130 mg/m(2)) was given on Days 1, 19, and 38 with the same radiotherapy regimen as used for PLAFUR. Surgery was performed 6-8 weeks after completion of chemoradiotherapy. All pathologic specimens were reviewed by a designated expert pathologist. The primary endpoint of this study was pathologic tumor downstaging (defined as tumor regression grade 1-2). Secondary endpoints included the incidence of ypT0, clinical tumor downstaging, sphincter-saving surgery, and acute treatment-related toxicity. RESULTS: Between 2002 and 2005, 164 patients were accrued in 10 Italian centers, 83 patients in the PLAFUR arm and 81 in the TOMOX-RT arm. Overall, tumor regression grade 1-2 was observed in 76 patients (46.4%) and ypT0 in 49 (29.9%). The tumor regression grade 1-2 rate was 41.0% vs. 51.9% (p = 0.162) and the ypT0 rate was 24.1% vs. 35.8% (p = 0.102) for the PLAFUR vs. TOMOX-RT arm, respectively. The overall rate of tumor regression grade 1 and ypN+ was 4.6%. The occurrence of ypT downstaging was significantly greater in the TOMOX-RT arm (p = 0.035). Grade 3-4 acute toxicity occurred in 19 patients (11.6%): 7.1% in the PLAFUR arm vs. 16.4% in the TOMOX-RT arm. Sphincter-saving surgery was performed in 143 patients (87.2%) overall: 87.9% in the PLAFUR arm and 86.4% in the TOMOX-RT arm. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the PLAFUR regimen, TOMOX-RT achieved a greater incidence of downstaging but was associated with a correspondingly greater rate of acute Grade 3+ toxicity. With longer follow-up, the local control and survival rates might offer additional guidance as to the choice of regimen.     

The role of local excision in rectal cancer after complete response to neoadjuvant treatment

Correlation between pathological response of primary tumour and mesorectal lymph node involvement was prospectively evaluated to assess the role of local excision (LE) in rectal cancer after complete response to neoadjuvant treatment. A series of 272 consecutive rectal cancer, submitted to neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (RCT) and surgery with total mesorectal excision (TME) were analysed. Tumour downstaging (pT) and tumour regression grade (TRG) together with sex, age, location of the tumour, pre-treatment clinical stage, type of chemoradiation and operation performed entered in an univariate and multivariate analysis. Pathological complete response on primary tumour was found in 56 patients (20.6%). Lymph node metastases were found in 72 patients (26.5%). The rate of positive nodes was 1.8% for pT0 and TRG1 cases, respectively, to go up to 6.3% for pT1 and 24.1% for TRG 2 cases, respectively. At the univariate analysis, factors with a statistically significant correlation with the risk of lymph node metastasis were: clinical pre-treatment N stage (p<0.05), pT stage (p<0.001) and TRG (p<0.001). At the multivariate analysis, the best predictors of pathologic lymph node involvement were pT stage (p=0.0013 ) and TRG (p=0.0011). Because LE is an adequate technique to assess the tumour pathological response and nodal involvement in pT0 or TRG1 cases seems extremely infrequent, radical resection is probably not justified after pathological complete response. Prospective randomized trials are necessary to establish if, in these cases, LE can guarantee the same oncologic results offered by the currently adopted protocols of RCT followed by radical resections.     

Does downstaging predict improved outcome after preoperative chemoradiation for extraperitoneal locally advanced rectal cancer? A long-term analysis of 165 patients

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of tumor response; tumor and nodal downstaging; and cTNM, yTNM (clinical stage after chemoradiation, based on preoperative imaging), and pTNM classifications on long-term outcome in patients with rectal cancer treated with preoperative 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based concurrent chemoradiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between January 1990 and March 1998, 165 consecutive patients with locally advanced extraperitoneal cancer of the rectum were treated with preoperative chemoradiation. Four patients had a cT2 lesion (2.5%), 120 had a cT3 lesion (74.5%), and 41 had a cT4 lesion (23%). The nodal involvement at combined imaging was cN0 in 21%, cN1 in 41%, cN2 in 34%, and cN3 in 4%. Preoperative chemoradiation was delivered according to 1 of 3 schedules: (1) FUMIR-T3 (from 1990 to 1995) for patients with cT3N0-2 or cT2N1-2 rectal carcinoma (82 patients): 37.8 Gy (1.8 Gy/fraction) plus 5-FU, 1 g/m(2)/d on Days 1-4, continuous infusion, and mitomycin-C, 10 mg/m(2)/d on Day 1; (2) FUMIR-T4 (from 1990 to 1999) for patients with cT4N0-3 or cT3-4N3 rectal carcinoma (40 patients): 45 Gy (1.8 Gy/fraction) plus 5-FU, 1 g/m(2)/d on Days 1-4 and 29-32, continuous infusion, and mitomycin-C, 10 mg/m(2)/d on Days 1 and 29; and (3) PLAFUR-4 (from 1995 to 1998) for patients with cT3N0-2 or cT2N1-2 rectal carcinoma (42 patients): 50.4 Gy (1.8 Gy/fraction) plus 5-FU, 1 g/m(2)/d on Days 1-4 and 29-32, continuous infusion, and cisplatin, 60 mg/m(2)/d on Days 1 and 29. Four to five weeks after chemoradiation, patients were reevaluated for clinical response by imaging studies (CT scan, transrectal ultrasonography, barium enema, liver ultrasonography, chest X-rays) and restaged (yTNM). Surgery was performed 6-8 weeks after chemoradiation. Adjuvant chemotherapy (5-FU + l-folinic acid) was delivered to 26 patients in the FUMIR-T4 protocol group. Local control (LC), freedom from distant metastases (FDM), disease-free survival, and overall survival (OS) were evaluated according to the clinical response and cTNM, yTNM, and pTNM classification. The median follow-up was 67 months. RESULTS: The 5-year survival rate was 100% for cT2, 77% for cT3, and 62% for cT4 (p = 0.0497); after chemoradiation, it ranged between 81% and 91% for pT0-pT2 and dropped to 66% for pT3 and 47% for pT4 (p = 0.014). The 5-year local control rate was, at the first staging, 84% for cT3 and 72% for cT4; after chemoradiation, the pT stage correlated significantly with LC (p = 0.0012): 100% for pT0, 83% for pT1, 88% for pT2, 79% for pT3, and 46% for pT4. N stage was statistically significant in predicting FDM and OS at any staging step. A significant impact of tumor response, tumor downstaging, and nodal downstaging on LC, FDM, disease-free survival, and OS was also recorded. If the residual tumor, before surgery, had a tumor index <30 (i.e., width less than one-quarter of rectal circumference and length in its caudocranial axis < or =30 mm), the 5-year LC, FDM, disease-free survival, and OS rates were significantly higher at both the univariate and the multivariate analyses. The surgical procedure was tailored according to tumor downstaging, and thus the choice of sphincter-preserving surgery was based on the distance between the lower pole of the tumor and the anorectal ring "after" chemoradiation. In 36 patients with the lower pole of the lesion in the range of 0-30 mm from the anorectal ring, 16 patients (44%) underwent a sphincter-saving procedure. All clinical outcomes were similar compared with 20 patients with tumor located at the same rectum level who received an abdominoperineal resection. CONCLUSION: After preoperative chemoradiation, clinical response and tumor/nodal pathologic downstaging showed a close correlation with improved outcomes. The better 5-year survival and local control in pT0-2 patients regardless of their initial stage seems to confirm a heterogeneity in rectal cancer patients. The responder population showed a behavior similar to rectal cancer diagnosed at Stage cT1-2 and treated with conservative surgery alone. Additional studies aimed at improving local tumor response seem justified. Trials of sphincter-saving surgery after a major response are warranted.     

Preoperative chemoradiation with oral tegafur within a multidisciplinary therapeutic approach in patients with T3-4 rectal cancer

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the activity in terms of downstaging histologic patterns of residual tumor and clinical tolerance of a neoadjuvant chemoradiation program with oral tegafur for rectal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From May 1998 to May 2001, 62 consecutive patients with cT(3-4) or cN(+) rectal cancer, or both, were treated with 45-50 Gy (1.8 Gy/day; 25 fractions) and oral tegafur 1200 mg/day. Surgery was performed 6 weeks after the completion of chemoradiation. All patients received a boost with intraoperative electron beam radiotherapy (IOERT) over the presacral space. RESULTS: Grade 3-4 hematologic toxicity consisted on Grade 3 anemia in 1 patient. Nonhematologic toxicity was mild. Fifteen patients (23%) had Grade 3 dermatitis, 16 (25%) had Grade 3, and 2 (3%) had Grade 4 proctitis. The median dose of radiotherapy was 50.4 Gy. Surgery consisted on anterior resection in 38 patients (61%) and abdominoperineal amputation in 24 (39%). Five complete pathologic responses were observed (8%), and 29 patients (47%) had a minimal microscopic residual tumor (mic category). The total downstaging rate was 68%. With a median follow-up of 46 months, the pelvic control rate was 95%, disease-free survival 74.1%, and overall survival 76.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation with oral tegafur is feasible, well tolerated, and active, with the additional advantage of offering the convenience of oral chemotherapy.     

Capecitabine in combination with preoperative radiation therapy in locally advanced, resectable, rectal cancer: a multicentric phase II study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to evaluate tolerance and efficacy of preoperative treatment with capecitabine in combination with radiation therapy (RT) in patients with locally advanced, resectable, rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-three patients with potentially resectable T3, N0-2 (87%) and T4, N0-2 (13%) rectal cancer were treated with capecitabine (825 mg/m2, twice daily for 7 days/week) and concomitant RT (50.4 Gy/28 fractions). Patients underwent surgery after 6-8 weeks followed, upon physician's indications, by 4-months adjuvant capecitabine. The primary end point was to determine the rate of pathologic complete response. Secondary end points were to assess the rate of clinical response and the safety profile. RESULTS: All patients but two completed the RT programme and 47 (89%) received 81%-100% of the capecitabine dose (100% of dose in 72% patients, 81%-95% in 17% patients and 48%-74% in 11% of patients). No patient had grade 4 toxicity. Grade 3 toxicity occurred in six patients (11%) and consisted mainly of leucopenia (4%) and hand-foot syndrome (4%). Mild or moderate toxicity was common and included leucopenia (72%), diarrhea (40%), proctitis (34%) and skin toxicity (20%). The overall clinical response rate was 58% and the downstaging rate was 57%, with a pathologic complete response rate of 24%. Among 34 patients with low-lying tumors (相似文献   

Preoperative hyperfractionated radiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancers: a phase I-II trial

PURPOSE: To assess the toxicity, pathologic response rates, type of surgery, and oncologic results in a prospective Phase I-II trial using pure hyperfractionated radiotherapy (RT) preoperatively in locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between September 1997 and April 2000, 50 patients with T3-T4 or N1 rectal cancers were treated preoperatively with 50 Gy (45 Gy to the pelvis and a 5-Gy tumor boost) in 40 fractions of 1.25 Gy during 4 weeks. The pretreatment tumor stage as determined by CT and endorectal ultrasonography (80% of patients) included 1 Stage T2 (2%), 45 T3 (90%), and 4 T4 (8%). Nodal involvement (N1) was documented in 26 patients (52%). Surgery was performed at a median interval of 45 days (range 26-114 days) after RT completion. Seventeen patients who presented with pT4 or pN1 and/or pM1 received 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy postoperatively. RESULTS: All patients completed the RT schedule as planned. Severe acute toxicities included two Grade 3 skin reactions (4%) that did not require a break. The other acute toxicities were Grade 2 or less (skin, diarrhea, urinary, rectal tenesmus, and fatigue). A complete pathologic response was observed in 7 patients (14%), and microscopic residual cancer was found in 10 (20%). Of the 20 patients presenting with tumor located < or = 6 cm from the anal verge, sphincter-saving surgery was performed in 14 (70%). At 3 years, the actuarial locoregional control rate was 90.5%, and the disease-free survival rate was 74.6%. At a median follow-up of 32 months, 4 patients (8%) presented with severe late complications (Grade 3-4) that might have been RT related (one rectovaginal fistula, two chronic perineal fistulas, and one bilateral ureteral stenosis). CONCLUSION: In locally advanced rectal cancer, preoperative hyperfractionated RT to a total dose of 50 Gy is feasible, with acceptable acute and late toxicity and an objective downstaging effect. In view of these results, this schedule might be used as a basis for additional investigation regarding RT dose escalation or the addition of concomitant chemotherapy.     

Preoperative concomitant radiochemotherapy with a 5-fluorouracil plus folinic acid bolus in the combined treatment of locally advanced extraperitoneal rectal cancer: a long-term analysis on 27 patients

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: Many studies of preoperative chemoradiation in resectable rectal cancer have focused on down-staging and sphincter-saving procedures. The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term outcome in resectable rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiation and surgery by only one surgical team irrespective of the tumor downstaging. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From 1992 to 2001, in a cooperative study between the Institute of Semeiotica Chirurgica and the Division of Radiotherapy of the Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, 27 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer were treated with preoperative chemoradiation, followed by surgery after 4-6 weeks, and, just for 6 of them, by adjuvant chemotherapy. Seventeen patients were staged T3 N1 (63%), 4 patients T3N0 (15%), 4 patients T3N2 (15%) and 2 T4N2 (7.5%). Twenty-three patients (85.1%) had signs of nodal involvement at combined imaging. Radiation therapy was delivered to the posterior pelvis at a dose of 45 Gy to the tumor (clinical target volume) and the whole pelvis (planning target volume). Fractionation was conventional: 1.8 Gy/day, 5 fractions a week. Radiotherapy was started on Monday for all patients and was delivered with a linear accelerator. Concomitant chemotherapy consisted of 5-fluorouracil (350 mg/m2/day, as an intravenous bolus on days 1-5 and 29-33 of radiotherapy) and folinic acid (L-isomer) (10 mg/m2 as an intravenous bolus on days 1-5 and 29-33). This chemotherapy was generally administered about 1 hr before radiotherapy. Data were analyzed on July 2002; median follow-up was 59 months (range, 20-116 months). No patient was lost during the follow-up. RESULTS: All patients completed the treatment. Grade > 3 acute toxicity occurred in 11% of the patients and late toxicity was 15%. A pathologic complete response was recorded in 22% of patients; sphincter-preserving surgery was feasible in 44%. Seven patients died: 2 of them perioperatively, 1 patient died with local recurrence, and 1 died with distant metastases; 3 patients died during the follow-up for other causes. Five-year local control was 95% and overall survival was 84%. CONCLUSIONS: Our study, although limited in number, demonstrated good results in local control and disease-free survival with a limited toxicity.     

Tumor regression in mesorectal lymphnodes after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer.

AIMS: The histological modification produced by neoadjuvant chemoradiation on primary rectal cancer has been investigated by many authors, and a prognostic value of tumor regression grade (TRG) has been identified. Tumor regression grade on metastatic mesorectal lymphnodes has been never evaluated. The purpose of this study is to analyse the TRG on mesorectal lymphnodes (lymphnode regression grade, LRG) after preoperative chemoradiation in rectal cancer patients and to determine the correlation with TRG of primary tumor. METHODS: Surgical specimens from 35 patients who underwent chemoradiation were included. LRG on mesorectal lymphnodes was assessed by immunohistochemistry. Response to treatment was evaluated by a 5-point LRG based on the ratio of residual tumor to fibrosis. RESULTS: Complete pathologic response (LRG 1) was observed in 18 patients (51%). In 4 patients (11%) no regression was observed (LRG 5). In 4 cases only reactive lymphnodes were found. LRG on lymphnodes significantly correlated with TRG on primary tumor (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation determines a tumor regression on mesorectal lymphnodes as on primary tumor; further studies are needed to evaluate the prognostic value of LRG.     

Improved incidence of pT0 downstaged surgical specimens in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) treated with induction oxaliplatin plus 5-fluorouracil and preoperative chemoradiation.

PURPOSE: To compare efficacy in terms of pathologic response in LARC patients treated with preoperative chemoradiation, with or without a short-intense course of induction oxaliplatin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 05/98 to 10/02, 114 patients were treated with preoperative chemoradiation (4500-5040 cGy + oral Tegafur 1200 mg/day) for cT(3)-(4)N(+/x)M(0) rectal cancer. Starting 05/01, 52 consecutive patients additionally received induction FOLFOX-4, oxaliplatin (85 mg/m(2) iv d1), 5-FU (400 mg/m(2) iv bolus d1) and 600 mg/m(2) iv continuous infusion in 22 h with leucovorin (200 mg iv) d1 and d2, every 15 days (2 cycles), followed by the previously described Tegafur chemoradiation regime. Surgery was performed in 5-6 weeks. Pathological assessment investigated post-treatment T and N status in the rectal wall and peri-rectal tissues. RESULTS: Patients, tumor and treatment characteristics were comparable between groups. Incidence of pT(0) specimens was significantly increased by induction FOLFOX-4 (P = 0.006). Total T and N downstaging were 58% versus 75% and 42% versus 40%, respectively (P = ns). T downstaging of > or =2 categories was significantly superior in FOLFOX-4 group (P = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: Short-intense induction FOLFOX-4 significantly improves pathologic complete response in LARC patients treated with tegafur-sensitized preoperative chemoradiation. The 44% rate of pT(0)-(1) specimens observed in the oxaliplatin group should impulse innovative surgical approaches to promote ano-rectal sphincter conserving protocols.     

Preoperative chemoradiation of locally advanced T3 rectal cancer combined with an endorectal boost

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect and feasibility of concurrent radiation and chemotherapy combined with endorectal brachytherapy in T3 rectal cancer with complete pathologic remission as end point. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The study included 50 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma. All patients had T3 tumor with a circumferential margin 0-5 mm on a magnetic resonance imaging scan. The radiotherapy was delivered by a technique including two planning target volumes. Clinical target volume 1 (CTV1) received 60 Gy/30 fractions, and CTV2 received 48.6 Gy/27 fractions. The tumor dose was raised to 65 Gy with endorectal brachytherapy 5 Gy/1 fraction to the tumor bed. On treatment days, the patients received uracil and tegafur 300 mg/m2 concurrently with radiotherapy. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients underwent operation. Histopathologic tumor regression was assessed by the Tumor Regression Grade (TRG) system. TRG1 was recorded in 27% of the patients, and a further 27% were classified as TRG2. TRG3 was found in 40%, and 6% had TRG4. The toxicity was low. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that high-dose radiation with concurrent chemotherapy and endorectal brachytherapy is feasible with a high rate of complete response, but further trials are needed to define its possible role as treatment option.     

Predictors of tumor response and downstaging in patients who receive preoperative chemoradiation for rectal cancer

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to identify predictive factors for pathologic complete response and tumor downstaging after preoperative chemoradiation for rectal cancer. METHODS: Between 1989 and 2004, 562 patients with nonmetastatic rectal adenocarcinoma received preoperative chemoradiation and underwent mesorectal excision. The median radiation dose was 45 Gray (Gy) (range, 19.8-58.6 Gy), 77% of patients received concurrent infusional 5-fluorouracil, 20% of patients received concurrent capecitabine, and 3% of patients received other regimens. RESULTS: Nineteen percent of patients achieved a pathologic complete response (CR), whereas 20% of patients had only microscopic residual disease at surgery, and 61% of patients had macroscopic residual disease at surgery. Downstaging of the tumor stage occurred in 57% of patients. The results from a univariate analysis indicated that tumor circumferential extent>60% (P=.033) and pretreatment carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level>2.5 ng/mL (P=.015) were associated significantly with lower pathologic CR rates. The univariate analysis also indicated that tumor circumferential extent>60% (P=.001), pretreatment CEA level>2.5 ng/mL (P=.006), and distance from the anal verge>5 cm (P=.035) were associated significantly with lower downstaging rates. The results from a multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that greater circumferential extent of tumor (odds ratio [OR], 0.43; P=.033) independently predicted a lower pathologic CR rate. The multivariate logistic regression analysis also indicated that greater circumferential extent of tumor (OR, 0.49; P=.020) and greater distance from the anal verge (OR, 0.46; P=.010) independently predicted a lower downstaging rate. CONCLUSIONS: Circumferential extent of tumor, CEA level, and distance from the anal verge predicted for the pathologic response to preoperative chemoradiation for patients with rectal cancer. Therefore, these factors may be used to predict outcomes for patients, to develop risk-adapted treatment strategies, and to target patients who participate in trials of newer therapies.     

Rectal tumor fragmentation as a response pattern following chemoradiation

BackgroundTumor response to neoadjuvant therapy is heterogenous and prognostically important for locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma (LARC) patients. Commonly applied response classification approaches including tumor regression grading (TRG) and TN downstaging can be discordant. The aim of this study is to compare the prognostic value of discordant tumor response measurement categorized according to the AJCC/CAP TRG schema and ypTN stage.MethodsThis is a single-center retrospective review of 90 consecutive patients with stage II-III rectal cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT), total mesorectal excision (TME) and adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) between 2007 and 2018. Two pathologists re-examined each case to assign a consensus AJCC TRG. A Cox proportional hazards ratio model assessed the effect of patient, tumor, and treatment factors on disease-free survival (DFS).ResultsMedian follow-up after surgery was 46 months (95% CI: 41–50 months). Median age at diagnosis was 55 years (range: 27–80). Most patients were male (58%) and Caucasian (92%) with clinical stage III disease (68%). Seventy-three patients (81%) underwent low anterior resection (LAR), 17 (19%) underwent abdominoperineal resection (APR). The median interval from completion of nCRT to surgery was 62 days (IQR: 56–70 days). The 4-year OS, DFS, and LC was 92.4%, 74.4%, and 90.2%, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, ypTN downstaging was not prognostically significant; however, AJCC TRG score 3 (minimal tumor response to treatment) was strongly predictive for inferior DFS (3-year DFS 79% vs. 25%, P<0.001). Patients with TRG 3 had a significantly higher risk of both local (75% vs. 5%) and distant failure (75% vs. 19%).ConclusionsMinimal tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy, AJCC TRG 3, irrespective of ypTN downstaging, is a pattern of residual disease that is at highest risk for recurrence. Response categorization discrepancies may be partly explained by alternative patterns of residual disease, including tumor fragmentation, and may be best reflected by TRG. The optimal tumor response categorization method requires further study to best stratify patient risk and management.     

Preoperative chemoradiation in rectal cancer: Retrospective comparison between capecitabine and continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil

BACKGROUND: We compared the efficacy and toxicity of oral capecitabine and continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in the preoperative chemoradiation treatment of patients with rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The files of 89 patients with rectal cancer, 43 treated preoperatively with oral capecitabine and 46 with intravenous 5-FU, were reviewed, and the outcome of the groups was compared. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in the complete pathological response rate between the capecitabine and the 5-FU groups (30% vs. 17%, P = 0.15). The downstaging rate was higher in the capecitabine group (77% vs. 50%, P = 0.009). Toxicity was mild in both groups. The rate of Grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity was similar in the two groups (diarrhea 2% vs. 4%, proctitis 5% vs. 7%), except for one patient in the 5-FU group (2%) who developed a rectovaginal fistula. In the capecitabine group, one patient (2%) had Grade 3 hand-foot syndrome, and another had an acute myocardial infarction. In the 5-FU group, two patients (4%) had Grade 3 hematological toxicity, and three (6%) had complications from Port-a-Cath insertion. CONCLUSION: Preoperative chemoradiation with oral capecitabine appears to be safe and well tolerated, and at least as good as continuous 5-FU.     

A comparative study of volumetric analysis, histopathologic downstaging, and tumor regression grade in evaluating tumor response in locally advanced rectal cancer following preoperative chemoradiation

PURPOSE: To compare tumor volume reduction rate, histopathologic downstaging, and tumor regression grade (TRG) among tumor responses in rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2002 and 2004, 30 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer underwent preoperative CRT, followed by surgical resection. Magnetic resonance volumetry was performed before and after CRT. Histopathologic tumor staging and tumor regression were reviewed. We compared pre- and post-CRT tumor volume and percent of volume reduction, according to histopathologic downstaging and TRG. RESULTS: The tumor volume reduction rates ranged from 14.6% to 100%. Mean pre- and post-CRT tumor volumes were significantly smaller in patients who showed T downstaging than in those who did not (p = 0.040, 0.014). The mean tumor volume reduction was 66.4% vs. 55.2% (p = 0.361). However, the mean pre- and post-CRT tumor volume and mean tumor volume reduction rate between patients who showed N downstaging and those who did not were not statistically different (p = 0.176, 0.767, and 0.899). With respect to TRG, the mean pre- and post-CRT tumor volumes were not statistically significant (p = 0.108, 0.708, and 0.120). CONCLUSION: Tumor volume reduction rate does not correlate with histopathologic downstaging and TRG. It might be hazardous to evaluate tumor response with respect to volume reduction and to select the surgical method on this basis.     

Prognostic significance of postchemoradiation stage following preoperative chemotherapy and radiation for advanced/recurrent rectal cancers

PURPOSE: To evaluate the prognostic significance of postchemoradiation pathologic stage and implications for further therapy following preoperative chemoradiation and surgery for advanced/recurrent rectal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Seventy-seven patients with advanced (fixed or tethered T4) or recurrent rectal cancer were treated with preoperative chemoradation followed by surgical resection of disease. Chemotherapy consisted of either of bolus 5-FU 500 mg/m(2) per day or continuous venous infusion 225 mg/m(2) per day for the duration of radiation. Radiation therapy was planned to be delivered to the whole pelvis to a dose of 45 Gy followed by a boost to the area of the tumor of 5-15 Gy. Total radiation doses ranged from 40 to 63 Gy with a median of 55.8 Gy. Surgical resection was then carried out 6-10 weeks following the completion of treatment (median, 7 weeks). Twenty-eight patients underwent abdominoperineal resection and and 49 patients had sphincter-sparing surgical procedures. None of the patients received postoperative chemotherapy. Follow-up in these patients ranges from 1 year to 8 years with a median of 3 years. RESULTS: Significant downstaging of disease was observed with 12/77 (16%) having no residual disease(pT0) and 13% (10/77) found to have pT1-2, N0 disease, 31% (24/77) with pT3-4, N0 and 40% (31/77) for pT0-4, N1-2 cancers. Survival by pathologic stage was 100% for pT0-2, N0 cancers, 80% for pT3-4, N0 and 73% for pTx, N1-2. Local recurrence of disease was observed in 0% of patients with pT0-2, N0 as compared with 13% (3/24) in pT3-4, N0 and 16% (5/31) in pT0-4, N1-2 patients. CONCLUSION: Downstaging following preoperative chemoradiation is a significant prognostic factor. Patients with pT0, T1, or T2 disease have an excellent prognosis and are unlikely to fail locally or with systemic disease. However, patient with T3/T4 or N+ disease may benefit from further adjuvant chemotherapy.