Colon capsule endoscopy

Wireless capsule endoscopy has become the first imaging tool for small bowel examination. Recently, new capsule endoscopy applications have been developed, such as esophageal capsule endoscopy and colon capsule endoscopy. Clinical trials results have shown that colon capsule endoscopy is feasible, accurate and safe in patients suffering from colonic diseases. It could be a good alternative in patients refusing conventional colonoscopy or when it is contraindicated. Upcoming studies are needed to demonstrate its utility for colon cancer screening and other indications such us ulcerative colitis. Comparative studies including both conventional and virtual colonoscopy are also required.     

Is there a role for colon capsule endoscopy beyond colorectal cancer screening? A literature review

Colon capsule endoscopy is recommended in Europe al-ternatively to colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screen-ing in average risk individuals. The procedure has also been proposed to complete colon examination in cases of incomplete colonoscopy or when colonoscopy is contraindicated or refused by the patient. As tissue samples cannot be obtained with the current capsule device, colon capsule endoscopy has no place in di-agnosing ulcerative colitis or in dysplasia surveillance. Nevertheless, data are accumulating regarding its fea-sibility to examine ulcerative colitis disease extent and to monitor disease activity and mucosal healing, even though reported results on the capsule’s performance in this field vary greatly. In this review we present the currently available evidence for the use of colon cap-sule endoscopy to complement colonoscopy failure to reach the cecum and its use to evaluate ulcerative coli-tis disease activity and extent. Moreover, we provide anoutlook on issues requiring further investigation before the capsule becomes a mainstream alternative to colo-noscopy in such cases.     

Esophageal capsule endoscopy

Capsule endoscopy is now considered as the first imaging tool for small bowel examination. Recently, new capsule endoscopy applications have been developed, such as esophageal capsule endoscopy and colon capsule endoscopy. Esophageal capsule endoscopy in patients with suspected esophageal disorders is feasible and safe, and could be also an alternative procedure in those patients refusing upper endoscopy. Although large-scale studies are needed to confirm its utility in GERD and cirrhotic patients, current results are encouraging and open a new era in esophageal examination.     

Non-small-bowel abnormalities identified during small bowel capsule endoscopy

AIM:To investigate the incidence of non-small-bowelabnormalities in patients referred for small bowel capsule endoscopy,this single center study was performed.METHODS:Small bowel capsule endoscopy is an accepted technique to investigate obscure gastrointestinal bleeding.This is defined as bleeding from the digestive tract that persists or recurs without an obviousetiology after a normal gastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy.Nevertheless,capsule endoscopy sometimesreveals findings outside the small bowel,i.e.,withinreach of conventional endoscopes.In this retrospectivesingle center study,595 patients undergoing capsuleendoscopy between 2003 and 2009 were studied.Theincidence of non-small bowel abnormalities was defined as visible abnormalities detected by capsule endoscopy that are located within reach of conventionalendoscopes.RESULTS:In 595 patients,referred for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding or for suspected Crohn’s disease,abnormalities were found in 306(51.4%).Of these 306patients,85(27.7%)had abnormalities within reach of conventional endoscopes;63 had abnormalities apparently overlooked at previous conventional endoscopies,10 patients had not undergone upper and lower endoscopy prior to capsule endoscopy and 12 had abnormalities that were already known prior to capsule endoscopy.The most common type of missed lesions were vascular lesions(n=47).Non-small-bowel abnormalities were located in the stomach(n=15),proximal small bowel(n=22),terminal ileum(n=21),colon(n=19)or at other or multiple locations(n=8).Ten patients with abnormal findings in the terminal ileum had not undergone examination of the ileum during colonoscopy.CONCLUSION:A significant proportion of patients undergoing small bowel capsule endoscopy had lesions within reach of conventional endoscopes,indicating that capsule endoscopy was unnecessarily performed.     

Role of capsule endoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease

Videocapsule endoscopy(VCE) has revolutionized our ability to visualize the small bowel mucosa. This modality is a valuable tool for the diagnosis of obscure small bowel Crohn’s disease(CD), and can also be used for monitoring of disease activity in patients with established small-bowel CD, detection of complications such as obscure bleeding and neoplasms, evaluation of response to anti-inflammatory treatment and postoperative recurrence following small bowel resection. VCE could also be an important tool in the management of patients with unclassified inflammatory bowel disease, potentially resulting in reclassification of these patients as having CD. Reports on postoperative monitoring and evaluation of patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis who have developed pouchitis have recenty been published. Monitoring of colonic inflammatory activity in patients with ulcerative colitis using the recently developed colonic capsule has also been reported. Capsule endoscopy is associated with an excellent safety profile. Although retention risk is increased in patients with small bowel CD, this risk can be significanty decreased by a routine utilization of a dissolvable patency capsule preceding the ingestion of the diagnostic capsule. This paper contains an overview of the current and future clinical applications of capsule endoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease.     

Capsule endoscopy:Current practice and future directions

Capsule endoscopy(CE)has transformed investigation of the small bowel providing a non-invasive,well tolerated means of accurately visualising the distal duodenum,jejunum and ileum.Since the introduction of small bowel CE thirteen years ago a high volume of literature on indications,diagnostic yields and safety profile has been presented.Inclusion in national and international guidelines has placed small bowel capsule endoscopy at the forefront of investigation into suspected diseases of the small bowel.Most commonly,small bowel CE is used in patients with suspected bleeding or to identify evidence of active Crohn’s disease(CD)(in patients with or without a prior history of CD).Typically,CE is undertaken after upper and lower gastrointestinal flexible endoscopy has failed to identify a diagnosis.Small bowel radiology or a patency capsule test should be considered prior to CE in those at high risk of strictures(such as patients known to have CD or presenting with obstructive symptoms)to reduce the risk of capsule retention.CE also has a role in patients with coeliac disease,suspected small bowel tumours and other small bowel disorders.Since the advent of small bowel CE,dedicated oesophageal and colon capsule endoscopes have expanded the fields of application to include the investigation of upper and lower gastrointestinal disorders.Oesophageal CE may be used to diagnose oesophagitis,Barrett’s oesophagus and varices but reliability in identifying gastroduodenal pathology is unknown and it does not have biopsy capability.Colon CE provides an alternative to conventional colonoscopy for symptomatic patients,while a possible role in colorectal cancer screening is a fascinating prospect.Current research is already addressing the possibility of controlling capsule movement and developing capsules which allow tissue sampling and the administration of therapy.     

Sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy:Current issues

Diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy can successfully be performed by applying moderate(conscious) sedation.Moderate sedation,using midazolam and an opioid,is the standard method of sedation,although propofol is increasingly being used in many countries because the satisfaction of endoscopists with propofol sedation is greater compared with their satisfaction with conventional sedation.Moreover,the use of propofol is currently preferred for the endoscopic sedation of patients with advanced liver disease due to its short biologic half-life and,consequently,its low risk of inducing hepatic encephalopathy.In the future,propofol could become the preferred sedation agent,especially for routine colonoscopy.Midazolam is the benzodiazepine of choice because of its shorter duration of action and better pharmacokinetic profile compared with diazepam.Among opioids,pethidine and fentanyl are the most popular.A number of other substances have been tested in several clinical trials with promising results.Among them,newer opioids,such as remifentanil,enable a faster recovery.The controversy regarding the administration of sedation by an endoscopist or an experienced nurse,as well as the optimal staffing of en-doscopy units,continues to be a matter of discussion.Safe sedation in special clinical circumstances,such as in the cases of obese,pregnant,and elderly individuals,as well as patients with chronic lung,renal or liver disease,requires modification of the dose of the drugs used for sedation.In the great majority of patients,sedation under the supervision of a properly trained endoscopist remains the standard practice worldwide.In this review,an overview of the current knowledge concerning sedation during digestive endoscopy will be provided based on the data in the current literature.     

Mucosal healing and deep remission: What does it mean?

The use of specific terms under different meanings and varying definitions has always been a source of confusion in science.When we point our efforts towards an evidence based medicine for inflammatory bowel diseases(IBD)the same is true:Terms such as"mucosal healing"or"deep remission"as endpoints in clinical trials or treatment goals in daily patient care may contribute to misconceptions if meanings change over time or definitions are altered.It appears to be useful to first have a look at the development of terms and their definitions,to assess their intrinsic and context-independent problems and then to analyze the different relevance in present-day clinical studies and trials.The purpose of such an attempt would be to gain clearer insights into the true impact of the clinical findings behind the terms.It may also lead to a better defined use of those terms for future studies.The terms"mucosal healing"and"deep remission"have been introduced in recent years as new therapeutic targets in the treatment of IBD patients.Several clinical trials,cohort studies or inception cohorts provided data that the long term disease course is better,when mucosal healing is achieved.However,it is still unclear whether continued or increased therapeutic measures will aid or improve mucosal healing for patients in clinical remission.Clinical trials are under way to answer this question.Attention should be paid to clearly address what levels of IBD activity are looked at.In the present review article authors aim to summarize the current evidence available on mucosal healing and deep remission and try to highlight their value and position in the everyday decision making for gastroenterologists.     

CT colonography in the diagnosis and management of colorectal cancer:Emphasis on pre-and post-surgical evaluation

This article addresses the use of computed tomographic colonography(CTC)for the diagnosis and management of colorectal cancer,focusing on presurgical evaluation of the colon proximal to an occlusive cancer and surveillance after cancer resection surgery.The key evidences accumulated in the literature and future work needed are summarized.CTC is a technically robust and the most practical method to evaluate the colon proximal to an occlusive cancer,which prevents colonoscopic examination past the occlusion,either before or after metallic stent placement.The high sensitivity of CTC for detecting cancers and advanced adenomas in the proximal colon can help prevent additional surgical procedures in patients showing negative results.However,the accuracy of CTC for distinguishing intramural cancers from adenomas is low,and the technique is limited in guiding management when a medium-sized lesion that do not show invasive features such as pericolic extension or nodal metastasis is found in the proximal colon.A maximal diameter≥15 mm has been proposed as a criterion for surgical removal of proximal lesions.However,this needs to be verified in a larger cohort.In addition,the influence of presurgical CTC results on the current post-cancer resection colonic surveillance timeline remains to be determined.CTC can be readily added to the routine abdominopelvic CT in the form of contrast-enhanced CTC,which can serve as an effective stand-alone tool for postcancer resection surveillance of both the colorectum and extracolonic organs.Although the accuracy of CTC has been demonstrated,its role in the current colonoscopy-based postoperative colonic surveillance protocols remains to be determined.Readers of CTC also need to be knowledgeable on the colonic lesions that are unique to the postoperative colon.     

Contribution of endoscopy in the management of eosinophilic esophagitis

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a clinicopathological entity characterized by a set of symptoms similar to gastroesophageal reflux disease and eosinophilic infi ltration of the esophageal epithelium. EoE is an emerging worldwide disease as documented in many countries. Recent reports indicate that EoE is increasingly diagnosed in both pediatric and adult patients although the epidemiology of this new disease entity remains unclear. It is unclear whether EoE is a new disease or a new classification of an old esophageal disorder. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and biopsies with histological examination of esophageal mucosa are required to establish the diagnosis of EoE, verify response to therapy, assess disease remission, document and dilate strictures and evaluate symptom recurrence of EoE. Repeated endoscopies with biopsies are necessary for monitoring of disease progression and treatment effi cacy. EGD has a fundamental role in the diagnosis and management of EoE, forming an essential part of the investigation and follow-up of this condition. EoE is now considered a systemic disorder and not only a local condition with an important immunological back-ground. One of the aims of research in EoE is to study non-invasive markers, such as immune indicators found in plasma, that correlate with local presence of EoE in esophageal tissues. Studies over the next few years will provide new information about diagnosis, pathogenesis, endoscopic/histologic criteria, non-invasive markers, novel and more eff icacious treatments, as well as establishing natural history. Randomized clinical trials are urgently called for to inform non-invasive diagnostic tests, hallmarks of natural history and more eff icacious treatment approaches for patients with EoE. The collaboration between pediatric and adult clinical and experimental studies will be paramount in the understanding and management of this disease.     

Capsule endoscopy compared with conventional colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasms

Colon capsule endoscopy(CCE) may be a means to overcome the low adherence to colorectal cancer screening. The device is an ingestible capsule with a video camera at both ends that can take photographs as it progresses through the gastrointestinal tract.PillCam colon(PCC1) may be used for structural evaluation of the large bowel following an adequate cleaning procedure.PCC1 measures 11 mm×31 mm and has dual cameras that enable the device to acquire video images from both ends with a wide coverage area,automatic light control and a frame rate of four frames per second.The system includes a sensor array and data recorder connected to the patient during the procedure.The recorded data are downloaded to the Given Imaging Rapid workstation for review of the colon video.The second generation of PillCam Colon(PCC2) is similar to PCC1 and incorporates new developments.The angle of view has been increased to 172 degrees.It has an adaptive frame rate,alternating from 35 frames per second while in motion to 4 images when virtually stationary.The new RAPIDsoftware now includes a simple graphic interface tool for polyp size estimation.The procedure of bowel cleansing until capsule ingestion is similar to that used for traditional colonoscopy.However it is more rigorous as the bowel cleanliness for capsule colonoscopy has to be excellent or at least good to result in an adequate sensi-tivity of the method.Briefly,it consists of 3.5-4 L of split dose polyethylene glycol.Oral NaP boosters are administered after 1-2 h if the capsule has entered the small bowel.Sodium phosphate(NaP) seems to be a necessary adjunct to the regimen because the total transit time is doubled without NaP.The cleansing level was considered to be good to excellent in 72%-88%in studies with PCC1.The sensitivity for significant polyps(>6 mm or more than 3 polyps>3 mm) ranged from 63%-88% with specificities between 64%-94%.PCC2 showed an improved sensitivity of 89%and a specificity of 76%. CCE seems to be a safe and effective method of visualizing the colonic mucosa through colon fluids without the need for sedation or insufflation of air.The sensitivity of CCE to detect polyps,advanced adenomas and cancer is lower compared to optical colonoscopy but improvements will be made in the near future.With an increased recording duration,even a panenteric examination of the whole gastrointestinal tract may be possible.     

A guide to diagnosis of iron deficiency and iron deficiency anemia in digestive diseases

Iron deficiency （ID）, with or without anemia, is often caused by digestive diseases and should always be investigated, except in very specific situations, as its causes could be serious diseases, such as cancer. Diagnosis of ID is not always easy. Low serum levels of ferritin or transferrin saturation, imply a situation of absolute or functional ID. It is sometimes difficult to differentiate ID anemia from anemia of chronic diseases, which can coexist. In this case, other parameters, such as soluble transferrin receptor activity can be very useful. After an initial evaluation by clinical history, urine analysis, and serological tests for celiac disease, gastroscopy and colonoscopy are the key diagnostic tools for investigating the origin of ID, and will detect the most important and prevalent diseases. If both tests are normal and anemia is not severe, treatment with oral iron can be indicated, along with stopping any treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. In the absence of response to oral iron, or if the anemia is severe or clinical suspicion of important disease persists, we must insist on diagnostic evaluation. Repeat endoscopic studies should be considered in many cases and if both still show normal results, investigating the small bowel must be considered. The main techniques in this case are capsule endoscopy, followed by     

Current status of device-assisted enteroscopy: Technical matters, indication, limits and complications

Enteroscopy, defined as direct visualization of the smallbowel with the use of a fiberoptic or capsule endoscopy, has progressed considerably over the past severalyears. The need for endoscopic access to improvediagnosis and treatment of small bowel disease hasled to the development of novel technologies one ofwhich is noninvasive, the video capsule, and a type of invasive technique, the deviceassisted enteroscopy.In particular, the device-assisted enteroscopy consiststhen of three different types of instruments all able toallow, in skilled hands, to display partially or throug-hout its extension (if necessary) the small intestine.Newer devices, double balloon, single balloon and spiral endoscopy, are just entering clinical use. The aim of this article is to review recent advances in small bowelenteroscopy, focusing on indications, modifications toimprove imaging and techniques, pitfalls, and clinical applications of the new instruments. With new technologies, the trials and tribulations of learning new endo-scopic skills and determining their role in the diagnosisand treatment of small bowel disease come. Identification of small bowel lesions has dramatically improved.Studies are underway to determine the best strategy toapply new enteroscopy technologies for the diagnosisand management of small bowel disease, particularly obscure bleeding. Vascular malformations such as angiectasis and small bowel neoplasms as adenocar cinomaor gas trointestinal stromal tumors. Complete entero-scopy of the small bowel is now possible. However, because of the length of the small bowel, endoscopic examination and the rapeutic maneuvers require significant skill, radiological assistance, the use of deep sedation with the assistance of the anesthetist. Prospective ran-domized studies are needed to guide diagnostic testing and the rapy with these new endoscopic techniques.     

Expanding role of capsule endoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease

Capsule endoscopy has been shown to detect small bowel inflammatory changes better than any other imaging modality. Selection criteria have been optimized to increase the yield of capsule endoscopy in patients suspected to have Crohn＇s disease. Capsule endoscopy allows for earlier diagnosis of Crohn＇s disease of the small bowel and improved diagnosis of colitis in patients where it is unclear if they suffer from Crohn＇s or ulcerative colitis. A test capsule is available to assess for small bowel strictures and thus avoid capsule retention. A common language has been developed and a new scoring index will be added to capsule software. It is envisioned that the manner in which we treat Crohn＇s disease in the future will change, based on earlier diagnosis and treatment aimed at mucosal healing rather than symptom improvement.     

Value of colonoscopy for prediction of prognosis in patients with ulcerative colitis

Ulcerative colitis （UC） is a chronic inflammatory bowel disorder characterized by exacerbations and remissions. Some UC patients remain refractory to conventional medical treatment while, in others, the effectiveness of drugs is limited by side-effects. Recently, cyclosporine and leukocyte removal therapy have been used for refractory UC patients. To predict the efficacy of these therapies is important for appropriate selection of treatment options and for preparation for colectomy. Endoscopy is the cornerstone for diagnosis and evaluation of UC. Endoscopic parameters in patients with severe or refractory UC may predict a clinical response to therapies, such as cyclosporine or leukocyte removal therapy. As for the patients with quiescent UC, relapse of UC is difficult to predict by routine colonoscopy. Even when routine colonoscopy suggests remission and a normal mucosal appearance, microscopic abnormalities may persist and relapse may occur later. To more accurately identify disease activity and to predict exacerbations in UC patients with clinically inactive disease is important for deciding whether medical treatment should be maintained. Magnifying colonoscopy is useful for the evaluation of disease activity and for predicting relapse in patients with UC.     

Colon capsule endoscopy: What we know and what we would like to know

Colonoscopy is usually perceived as an invasive and potentially painful procedure,being also affected by a small,but definite,risk of major complications(cardiopulmonary complications,perforation,hemorrhage)and even mortality.To improve both acceptability and safety,Pill Cam Colon Capsule Endoscopy(CCE)(Given Imaging Ltd,Yoqneam,Israel)has been developed.CCE represents a non-invasive technique that is able to explore the colon without sedation and air insufflation.The Second Generation of Colon Capsule Endoscopy(Pill Cam Colon 2)(CCE-2)was proven to be an accurate tool to detect colonic neoplastic lesions when used in average risk individuals.To date,the evidence supports the use of CCE-2 in case of colonoscopy failure,in patients unwilling to perform colonoscopy and when colonoscopy is contraindicated.Other potential applications,such as colorectal cancer screening or diagnostic surveillance ofinflammatory bowel disease need to be clarified.In this paper,the current“state of the art”,potential application of CCE and future needs are evaluated.     

Role of scintigraphy in inflammatory bowel disease

The diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease （IBD） depends on direct endoscopic visualization of the colonic and ileal mucosa and the histological study of the obtained samples. Radiological and scintigraphic methods are mainly used as an adjunct to endoscopy. In this review, we focus on the diagnostic potential of nuclear medicine procedures. The value of all radiotracers is described with special reference to those with greater experience and more satisfactory results. Tc-99m hexamethylpropylene amine oxime white blood cells remain a widely acceptable scintigraphic method for the diagnosis of IBD, as well as for the evaluation of disease extension and severity. Recently, pentavalent Tc-99m dimercaptosuccinic acid has been recommended as an accurate variant and a complementary technique to endoscopy for the follow-up and assessment of disease activity. Positron emission tomography alone or with computed tomography using fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose appears to be a promising method of measuring inflammation in IBD patients.     

Three-dimensional MR and axial CT colonography versus conventional colonoscopy for detection of colon pathologies

AIM: To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of MR colonography (MRC) and CT performance in detecting colon lesions, and to compare their sensitivity and specificity with that of conventional colonoscopy. METHODS: Forty-two patients suspected of having colonic lesions, because of rectal bleeding, positive fecal occult blood test results or altered bowel habits, underwent the examinations. After insertion of a rectal tube, the colon was filled with 1000-1500 mL of a mixture of 9 g/L NaCI solution, 15-20 mL of 0.5 mmol/L gadopentetate dimeglumine and 100 mL of iodinized contrast material. Once colonic distension was achieved, three-dimensional gradient-echo (3D-GRE) sequences for MR colonography and complementary MR images were taken in all cases. Immediately after MR colonography, abdominal CT images were taken by spiral CT in the axial and supine position. Then all patients were examined by conventional colonoscopy (CC). RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of MRC for colon pathologies were 96.4% and 100%, respectively. The percentage of correct diagnosis by MRC was 97.6%. The sensitivity and specificity of CT for colon pathologies were 92.8%, 100%, respectively. The percentage of correct diagnosis by CT was 95.2%. CONCLUSION: In detecting colon lesions, MRC achieved a diagnostic accuracy similar to CC. However, MRC is minimally invasive, with no need for sedation or analgesics during investigation. There is a lower percentage of perforation risk, and all colon segments can be evaluated due to multi-sectional imaging availability; intramural, extra-intestinal components of colonic lesions, metastasis and any additional lesions can be evaluated easily. MRC and CT colonography are new radiological techniques that promise to be highly sensitive in the detection of colorectal mass and inflammatory bowel lesions.     

PillCam COLON 2~ in Crohn's disease:A new concept of pan-enteric mucosal healing assessment

AIM: To evaluate mucosal healing in patients with small bowel plus colonic Crohn's disease(CD) with a single non-invasive examination, by using PillCam COLON 2.(PCC2).METHODS: Patients with non-stricturing nonpenetrating small bowel plus colonic CD in sustained corticosteroid-free remission were included. At diagnosis,patients had undergone ileocolonoscopy to identify active CD lesions, such as ulcers and erosions, and small bowel capsule endoscopy to assess the Lewis Score(LS). After ≥ 1 year of follow-up, patients underwent entire gastrointestinal tract evaluation with PCC2. The primary endpoint was assessment of CD mucosal healing, defined as no active colonic CD lesions and LS 135.RESULTS: Twelve patients were included(7 male;mean age: 32 years), and mean follow-up was 38 mo.The majority of patients(83.3%) received immunosuppressive therapy. Three patients(25%) achieved mucosal healing in both the small bowel and the colon,while disease activity was limited to either the small bowel or the colon in 5 patients(42%). It was possible to observe the entire gastrointestinal tract in 10 of the12 patients(83%) who underwent PCC2.CONCLUSION: Only three patients in sustainedcorticosteroid-free clinical remission achieved mucosal healing in both the small bowel and the colon, highlighting the limitations of clinical assessment when stratifying disease activity, and the need for pan-enteric endoscopy to guide therapeutic modification.     

Adverse events related to colonoscopy: Global trends and future challenges

Colonoscopy is a widely used method for diagnosing and treating colonic disease. The number of colonoscopies is increasing worldwide, and concerns about associated adverse events are growing. Large-scale studies using big data for post-colonoscopy complications have been reported. A colon perforation is a severe complication with a relatively high mortality rate. The perforation rate, as reported in large studies(≥ 50,000 colonoscopies) published since 2000, ranges from 0.005-0.085%. The trend in the overall perforation rate in the past 15 years has not changed significantly. Bleeding is a more common adverse event than perforation. Recent large studies(≥ 50,000 colonoscopies) have reported postcolonoscopy bleeding occurring in 0.001-0.687% of cases. Most studies about adverse events related to colonoscopy were performed in the West, and relatively few studies have been conducted in the East. The incidence of post-colonoscopy complications increases in elderly patients or patients with inflammatory bowel diseases. It is important to use a unified definition and refined data to overcome the limitations of previous studies. In addition, a structured training program for endoscopists and a systematic national management program are needed to reduce post-colonoscopy complications. In this review, we discuss the current trends in colonoscopy related to adverse events, as well as the challenges to be addressed through future research.