Sentinel lymph node biopsy after previous axillary surgery: A review

Background

The utility of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in the management of breast cancer is currently under close scrutiny. At primary diagnosis the use of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has restricted ALND for proven nodal disease, however the management of the axilla at local (in-breast) relapse is less clearly defined with many undergoing routine ALND. This review examines the role of SLNB in the re-operative setting with the objective of developing an axillary management algorithm for use at in-breast local relapse, and restricting ALND to node-positive recurrent cancers.

Methods

We reviewed published reports of SLNB at local relapse in women who had previously undergone axillary surgery either as lymph node biopsy, SLNB, axillary sampling (AS) or axillary lymph node dissection (ALND).

Results

There have been no randomised trials. Six reports with 327 cases were identified; of which 61% (199/327) had previous SLNB or ALND with <9 nodes removed. There was an overall successful sentinel lymph node (SLN) localisation at re-operation of 69% (227/327), range of 51-100%. In patients who have previously had limited axillary surgery (<9 nodes removed), the rate of successful SLN localisation was 83% (165/199), range of 68-100% and 142/165 (86%, range 80-100%) were node negative. In these highly selected patients no axillary recurrences were noted in those who had a negative SLN at re-operation after 26-46 months follow up.

Conclusion

SLNB at in-breast relapse is feasible and safe with successful localisation related to the extent of previous axillary surgery.     

Intraoperative sentinel node biopsy by one-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) avoids axillary lymphadenectomy in women with breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Background

There is no evidence that supports the recommendation of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in patients with breast cancer who have treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) to downsize tumors in order to allow breast conservation surgery, because NAC induces anatomical alterations of the lymphatic drainage. We evaluated the effectiveness of SLNB using intraoperative one-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) method to detect microscopic metastases or isolated tumor cells after NAC in patients with clinically negative axillary nodes at initial presentation.

Patients and methods

We evaluated in patients with breast cancer and clinically negative axilla at presentation, the effectiveness of SLNB by OSNA after NAC (71 patients) or prior to NAC (40 patients).

Results

The rate of SLN identification was 100% in both groups. 17 women with SLNB prior to systemic treatment showed positive nodes (14 macrometastases and 3 micrometastases), and positive SLNB were detected in 15 women with SLNB after NAC, which were 14 macrometastases and 1 micrometastase. The negative predictive value of ultrasonography was 57.5% in patients with SLNB prior to neoadjuvant therapy and 78.9% in patients with chemotherapy followed by SLNB.

Conclusions

Intraoperative SLNB using OSNA in women with clinically negative axillary lymph nodes at initial presentation who received NAC could predict axillary status with high accuracy. Also it allows us to take decisions about the indication or not to perform an axillary dissection at the moment, thus avoiding delay in the administration of chemotherapy and benefiting the patients from a single surgical procedure.     

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Alone after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Initial Cytology-Proven Axillary Node Metastasis

Purpose

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has been recently used to downstage breast cancer. However, in patients with initial axillary lymph node (ALN) metastasis, ALN dissection regardless of the NAC response remains the standard treatment. The purpose of this study was to identify the feasibility and accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) after NAC in patients with ALN metastasis at diagnosis.

Methods

From January 2007 to August 2013, data of patients who were diagnosed with invasive breast cancer and ALN metastasis and treated with NAC followed by definitive surgery in two centers were collected retrospectively. A total of 386 patients were enrolled and classified into five groups according to surgical procedure for the ALNs and pathologic results.

Results

At SLNB after NAC, sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) that stained blue or were hot, including suspicious nodes, were identified; the SLN identification and false-negative rates was 96% and 10%, respectively. There was no difference in the overall survival among the groups. For patients who revealed a pathologic complete node response, there was a significant difference in the disease-free survival rate between the SLNB only and complete ALN dissection groups (p=0.031). However, the rate of axillary recurrence demonstrated no significant differences among the groups (p>0.050).

Conclusion

SLNB after NAC in breast cancer patients with initial ALN metastasis may help identify downstaging to negative nodal status and thereby reduce the surgical morbidity by avoiding standard ALN dissection.     

Axillary sentinel node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Introduction

The role of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) with potentially sterilized axillary lymph nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) remains unclear.

Patients and methods

Between 2002 and 2008, SLNB with both blue-dye and radioisotope injection was performed in 77 patients with LABC whose cytopathologically confirmed positive axillary node(s) became clinically negative after NAC. Factors associated with SLN identification and false-negative rates, presence of non-sentinel lymph node (non-SLN) metastasis were analyzed retrospectively.

Results

SLNB was successful in 92% of the patients. Axillary status was predicted with 90% accuracy and a false-negative rate of 13.7%. Patients with residual tumor size >2 cm had a decreased SLN identification rate (p = 0.002). Axillary nodal status before NAC (N2 versus N1) was associated with higher false-negative rates (p = 0.04). Positive non-SLN(s) were more frequent in patients with multifocal/multicentric tumors (versus unifocal; p = 0.003) and positive lymphovascular invasion (versus negative; p = 0.0001). SLN(s) positive patients with pathologic tumor size >2 cm (versus ≤2 cm; p = 0.004), positive extra-sentinel lymph node extension (versus negative; p = 0.002) were more likely to have metastatic non-SLN(s).

Conclusions

SLNB has a high identification rate and modest false-negative rate in LABC patients who became clinically axillary node negative after NAC. Residual tumor size and nodal status before NAC affect SLNB accuracy. Additional involvement of non-SLN(s) increases with the presence of multifocal/multicentric tumors, lymphovascular invasion, residual tumor size >2 cm, and extra-sentinel node extension.     

Sentinel lymphadenectomy for the staging of clinical axillary node-negative breast cancer before neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Background

Several authors reported sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC). Nevertheless, the ideal time of SLNB is still a matter of debate.

Methods

We evaluated the feasibility and the accuracy of SLNB before NC using a combined procedure (blue dye and radio-labelled detection) before NC. Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) was performed after completion of NC in a homogeneous cohort study with clinically axillary node-negative breast cancer.

Results

Among the 20 women who had metastatic SLNB (65%), 4 (20%) had additional metastatic node on ALND. By contrast, all the 11 women who had no metastatic SLNB had no involved nodes in the ALND. The SLN identification rate before NC was 100% with any false negative.

Conclusions

SLNB before NC is a feasible and an accurate diagnostic tool to predict the pre-therapeutic axilla status. These findings suggest that ALND may be avoided in patients with a negative SLNB performed before NC.     

A prospective validation study of sentinel lymph node biopsy in multicentric breast cancer: SMMaC trial

Background

Multicentric breast cancer is often considered a contra-indication for sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy due to concerns with sensitivity and false negative rate. To assess SLN feasibility and accuracy in multicentric breast cancer, the multi-institutional SMMaC trial was conducted.

Methods

In this study 30 patients with multicentric breast cancer and a clinically negative axilla were prospectively included. Periareolar injection of radioisotope and blue dye was administered. In all patients SLN biopsy was validated by back-up completion axillary lymph node dissection.

Results

the SLN was successfully identified in 30 of 30 patients (identification rate 100%). The incidence of axillary metastases was 66.7% (20/30). The false negative rate was 0% (0/20) and the sensitivity was 100% (20/20). The negative predictive value was 100% (10/10).

Conclusion

SLN biopsy in multicentric breast cancer seems feasible and accurate and should therefore be considered in patients with multicentric breast cancer and clinically negative axilla.     

Reliability of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients

Purpose

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is an accurate and effective means of axillary nodal staging in early breast cancer. However its indication after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is under constant debate. The present study evaluates the reliability of SLNB in assessing axillary nodal status after NAC.

Methods

Data from 281 patients who had received NAC and subsequent SLNB were reviewed. The identification and false negative rates of SLNB were determined and the clinicopathologic factors associated with false negative results were investigated using univariate analysis.

Results

The identification rate of SLNB after NAC was 93.6% and the false negative rate was 10.4%. Hormone receptor status, especially progesterone receptor positivity, was significantly associated with false negative results. The accuracy of intraoperative frozen section examination of sentinel lymph nodes was 91.2%.

Conclusion

The identification rate of SLNB and the accuracy of intraoperative frozen section examination after NAC are comparable to the results without NAC in patients with early breast cancer. However considering the high false negative rates, general application of SLNB after NAC should be avoided. Patients with progesterone-positive tumors and non-triple-negative breast cancers may be a select group of patients in whom SLNB can be employed safely after NAC, but further studies are necessary.     

Prospective Feasibility Trial of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in the Setting of Inflammatory Breast Cancer

Background

Most inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) patients have axillary disease at presentation. Current standard is axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Advances in NACT have improved pathologic complete response (pCR) rates increasing interest in performing sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy (SLNB). Previous studies on SLNB for IBC patients did not assess nodal response with imaging or use dual tracer mapping. We sought to prospectively determine false negative rates of SLNB in IBC patients using dual tracer mapping, and to correlate pathology with preoperative axillary imaging.

Axillary recurrences after negative sentinel lymph node biopsy under local anaesthesia for breast cancer: A follow-up study after 5 years

Introduction

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is accepted as a standard surgical staging procedure for determining the tumour status of the regional lymph nodes. Until September 2000 we performed SLNB in general anaesthesia. Since 1999, after validation of the SLNB concept, axillary dissection was omitted in SLN-negative patients. This study presents our data after SLNB under local anaesthesia after a follow-up of at least 5 years.

Materials and methods

Between September 2000 and May 2003, 356 SLNBs were performed under local anaesthesia without sedation in patients with proven breast cancer (T4-tumours and small in situ carcinomas excluded) and without clinically or ultrasound guided cytological evidence of axillary node involvement. Lymphatic mapping and SLN identification were performed through the combination of blue dye and 99 m Tc-nanocolloid. All positive SLNs were followed by an axillary dissection up to level three. SLN-negative patients were followed without axillary clearance.

Results

In 353/356 SLNBs at least one sentinel node was found. 254/353 SLNs were tumour free. After a median follow-up of 73 months loco-regional and distant events were encountered in 10/353 SLNBs. Four patients (SLN-negative) showed tumour localization in the residual breast or chest wall (1.1%). Three patients (SLN-negative) presented with supraclavicular metastases (0.8%). In three patients (one SLN-negative and two SLN-positive followed by ALND) an axillary recurrence was encountered (0.8%).

Conclusion

This survey confirms the safety of the SLNB under local anaesthesia in selecting patients for axillary lymph node dissection in breast cancer.     

Accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy in large and multifocal/multicentric breast carcinoma—A systematic review

Background

While sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is established in the management of small unifocal breast cancer its role in management of multifocal (MF), multicentric (MC) and larger tumors is still evolving.

Methods

Medline was searched; studies meeting pre-determined criteria were included. Data were extracted and entered into evidence tables.

Results

Twenty six studies met inclusion criteria and reported data on accuracy; no randomized trials were identified. For MF cancers (n = 314 cases), success rate for identification of an SLN was 86-94%, SLN positivity rate 42-59%, false negative rate (FNR) 0-33% and overall accuracy 78-100%. For MC (n = 294 cases): success rate 92-100%, SLN positivity rate 25-61%, FNR 4-8% and accuracy 96-100%. For ‘multiple breast cancer’ (studies combining MF/MC cases; n = 996 cases): success rate 92-100%, SLN positivity rate 12-63%, FNR 0-25%, and accuracy 82-100%. For larger tumors (n = 1912 cases): success rate 86-100%, SLN positivity rate 49-77%, FNR 3-18% and accuracy 85-98%. For MC/MF and larger cancers overall non-SLN positivity rates were up to 82%; axillary recurrence rates were low but seldom reported.

Conclusion

There are no randomized trials evaluating the safety of SLNB in MF/MC and larger breast cancers. Based on limited evidence, success rate and FNR appear to be similar to those for small unifocal cancers, however node positivity rates are higher and rates of non-SLN positivity are very high. Awareness of these issues is essential when recommending SLNB based axillary management for these higher-risk tumors.     

Clinical Significance of the Axillary Arch in Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy

Purpose

The axillary arch is an anomalous muscle that is not infrequently encountered during axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) of breast cancer patients. In this study, we aimed to investigate how often the axillary arch is found during SLNB and whether it affects the intraoperative sentinel lymph node (SLN) identification rate.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the correlation between the presence of the axillary arch and the SLN sampling failure rate during SLNB in 1,069 patients who underwent axillary SLNB for invasive breast cancer.

Results

Of 1,069 patients who underwent SLNB, 79 patients (7.4%) had the axillary arch present. The SLNB failure rate was high when the patient''s body mass index was ≥25 (p=0.026), when a single SLN mapping technique was used (p=0.012), and when the axillary arch was present (p<0.001). These three factors were also found to be statistically significant by multivariate analysis, and of these three factors, presence of the axillary arch most significantly increased the SLNB failure rate (hazard ratio, 10.96; 95% confidence interval, 4.42-27.21; p<0.001). Additionally, if the axillary arch was present, the mean operative time of SLNB was 20.8 minutes, compared to 12.5 minutes when the axillary arch was not present (p<0.001). If the axillary arch was present, the SLN was often located in a high axillary region (67%) rather than in a general low axillary location.

Conclusion

The axillary arch was found to be a significant factor affecting intraoperative SLN failure rate. It is necessary to keep in mind that carefully checking the high axillar region during SLNB in breast cancer patients with the axillary arch is important for reducing SLN sampling failure.     

Enhanced Axillary Evaluation Using Reflector-Guided Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy: A Prospective Feasibility Study and Comparison With Conventional Lymphatic Mapping Techniques

Background

Recently there are efforts to use sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) techniques after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) to minimize axillary surgery. However, studies have shown higher false negative rates in this scenario, which might result in inaccurate assessment of treatment response and patient prognosis as well as leaving residual disease behind. In this study, we describe the use of reflector-guided excision of the percutaneously biopsied node (PBN) as an aid to conventional SLNB and its predictor of the axillary status after NAC.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in primary breast cancer: Trust the radiolabeled colloid method and avoid unnecessary procedures

Background

With regard to the sentinel lymph node (SLN) procedure in breast cancer, the study analyzed the impact of discrepancies between the number of clinically and histologically identified SLN, the impact of removing additional non-hot/non-blue but clinically conspicuous lymph nodes (LN), and whether the application of blue dye for mapping is necessary.

Methods

We analyzed 391 SLN procedures in which 928 SLN were removed. In all cases, radiolabeled colloid and blue dye were used for SLN mapping.

Results

In 60 cases (15.3%), additional LN that were not identified by the surgeon were found by histological examination. In 22 cases (5.3%), tissue which clinically resembled an SLN but was histologically connective tissue, was removed. In 76 cases (19.4%), 133 non-hot/non-blue but clinically conspicuous LN were removed. These additionally removed LN, however, did not alter the axillary staging. In 50.8% of the cases (n = 471), the SLN were marked only by radiolabeled colloid. In 27 cases (2.9%), the surgeon identified the LN through blue coloration alone; however, in all of the latter cases, these SLN were not deciding for axillary staging.

Conclusion

The mapping agents may accumulate in axillary tissue and mimic the existence of an SLN. The radiolabeled colloid method alone gives excellent mapping results. The additional application of blue dye is avoidable. Exact surgical preparation enables removal of the SLN only and avoids removal of LN-containing adjacent tissue. The removal of further clinically identifiable enlarged non-hot LN should only be done if there is strong suspicion of metastatic involvement.     

Review of Novel Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Techniques in Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Breast cancer patients who present with nodal metastasis receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with increasing frequency and can have complete pathologic response after treatment. In this clinical scenario, sentinel node mapping and biopsy are gaining acceptance instead of axillary dissection to avoid morbidity. Biopsy proven positive lymph nodes must be reliably excised and examined after NAC to further decrease the false negativity rate of sentinel lymph node (SLN) surgery. The standard method for axillary staging in breast cancer patients even after NAC is SLN biopsy (SLNB) with a radioisotope, blue dye, or both (dual technique). Currently, preoperative axillary staging with ultrasound and biopsy, along with placement of an image-detectable marker to be removed at the time of definitive surgery is recommended. In this study, we evaluated some methods of SLNB for patients treated with NAC like indocyanine green fluorescence, superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles, indigocarmine blue dye, contrast-enhanced ultrasound using microbubbles, and tattooing. Some methods are also needed to ensure that the initially biopsy proven positive node is removed at the time of surgery to be carefully evaluated for residual disease after chemotherapy like clip placement to the suspected or involved nodes before NAC, and removing the clipped node with the guidance of 125I-labeled radioactive seed or guide wires.     

The significance of immunohistochemistry positivity in sentinel nodes which are negative on haematoxylin and eosin in breast cancer

Introduction

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy allows a more detailed examination of a smaller number of lymph nodes in patients with clinically node negative breast cancer. Immunohistochemistry detects small tumour burden not routinely seen on haematoxylin and eosin (H&E). The significance of such findings remains to be fully elucidated.

Aim

To assess the axillary disease burden of patients in whom the sentinel lymph node biopsy was positive on immunohistochemistry and negative on H and E.

Methods

An analysis of patients who underwent SLN mapping for breast cancer at St Vincent's University Hospital from January 1st, 2000 to December 31st, 2006 was conducted. All SLNs were assessed by serial H&E and IHC sections. Patients with micrometastases (0.2–2 mm) underwent a completion axillary lymph node dissections (CLND). Patients with ITC (<0.2 mm) were individually discussed and a CLND was performed selectively based on additional clinicopathological criteria and patient preference. Analysis of the additional nodes from CLND was performed. Patients were followed for a median of 27 months (range 12–72 months).

Results

1076 patients who underwent SLN were included for analysis. 211 (20%) had a positive SLN biopsy using H&E. Forty-nine patients (5%) had a negative SLN on H&E which was positive on IHC. Of these, 15 had micrometastases and underwent a CLND. Two had further axillary nodal disease. ITC were found in the remaining 34 patients. Sixteen of these patients underwent a CLND. Five of this group had further nodal disease.

Conclusion

Micrometastases and isolated tumour cells, detected only by immunohistochemical analysis of sentinel lymph nodes, are associated with further positive nodes in the axilla in up to 15% of patients. This upstaging of disease may impact upon patient outcome.     

The real-time intra-operative evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer patients using One Step Nucleic Acid Amplification (OSNA) and implications for clinical decision-making

Introduction

One Step Nucleic Acid Amplification (OSNA) method for the intraoperative analysis of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in breast cancer, obviates a second operation to the axilla and thereby expedites progression to adjuvant therapy. Recent NICE guidelines have approved OSNA as a method of sentinel node diagnosis to support the above case.¹

Method

This is a single centre prospective cohort analysis of all patients undergoing breast cancer surgery including sentinel node biopsy from February 2010 to June 2012. Patients with negative SLN(s) on OSNA had no further axillary surgery. A validation phase was performed prior to using OSNA routinely. Those with micrometastases underwent a level 1 clearance, and >one SLN with macrometastases, underwent treatment by level 2 axillary dissection. The length of time from sentinel node retrieval to OSNA result was recorded.

Results

Four hundred and forty nodes were analysed in 212 patients with a mean age of 55 years (range 24–98). The sensitivity and specificity of OSNA was 93% and 94% respectively in cases of macrometastases. The process required additional median anaesthesia time of 20 min (range −48 to +65 min). Non-sentinel node positivity was 5% and 48% for micrometastasis and macrometastasis respectively.

Conclusion

OSNA identified 62 of 212 patients with at least one positive sentinel node, thereby sparing 29% from a second procedure to clear the axilla subsequently. The median waiting time of 20 min for node results from completion of breast procedure is acceptable and allows for an efficient operating list. OSNA can be incorporated into routine practice and with improved methods of imaging preoperatively, can be an excellent adjunct to the breast cancer patient pathway of care.     

Axillary nodal yields: A comparison between primary clearance and completion clearance after sentinel lymph node biopsy in the management of breast cancer

Aims

Axillary nodal status is the most important prognostic indicator which in turn influences adjuvant therapy and long term outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare total nodal yields from primary axillary lymph node dissection (pALND) with completion ALND after a cancer positive SLNB: either concurrently (cALND) following intra-operative assessment (IOA) of the SLN’s or as a delayed procedure (dALND) when the SLN was found to be cancer positive on post-operative histological examination.

Methods

All axillary procedures performed between May 2006 and September 2009 were identified from a prospective database and categorised into four groups: SLNB with no further axillary surgery, pALND, cALND and dALND. Total nodal yield was the sum of SLN/s and ALND yields.

Results

Of 1025 axillary procedures, ALND accounted for 332 (32.4%) of which 207 (62.3%) underwent pALND, 43 (12.9%) cALND, and 82 (24.6%) dALND. Median nodal yields were 15.0, 16.0 and 14.5 respectively (p = 0.3).

Conclusion

Total nodal yields for primary, concurrent and delayed ALND were comparable suggesting completion dALND performed as a second operation does not compromise axillary staging.     

The number of axillary nodes removed as a predictor of regional recurrence in node negative breast cancer

Purpose

To determine if the number of axillary nodes removed is a predictor of recurrence in node negative breast cancer.

Materials and methods

Five hundred thirty-six patients with T1-T2, N0 invasive breast cancer, treated with lumpectomy and axillary node dissection (AND), were reviewed from January 1, 1986 to December 31, 1992. Patients received radiation to whole breast only, without regional nodal radiation. There was no adjuvant chemotherapy or Tamoxifen given. Patients were grouped according to the number of axillary nodes dissected as follows: 1-5 nodes (91 patients), 6-10 nodes (225 patients) and >10 nodes (220 patients). Hazard ratios and p-values were determined for time to local recurrence, regional recurrence and for disease specific survival.

Results

Median follow-up was 11.2 years. The overall local recurrence and regional recurrence rates for the three groups were: 1-5 nodes, 9.9% and 8.8%, respectively, 6-10 nodes, 10.2% and 2.2%, respectively, and >10 nodes, 11.8% and 2.7%, respectively. The effect of number of axillary nodes removed was statistically significant only for regional recurrence (p = 0.017). There was no adverse effect on disease specific survival (p = 0.363).

Conclusion

The number of axillary nodes removed predicts only for regional recurrence in node negative breast cancer patients, with less than 6 nodes removed associated with higher regional recurrence. This may have clinical implications with the current practice of sentinel node biopsy (SNB) replacing axillary node dissection in early stage breast cancer.     

Sentinel lymph node detection in patients with vulvar carcinoma; Feasibility of intra-operative mapping with technetium-99m-labeled nanocolloid

Aims

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping appears to be feasible in patients with primary vulvar cancer. Previous protocols describe the injection of the technetium-99m-nanocolloid at least 3 h before surgery which involves two invasive procedures for the patient. In this study, we assessed the feasibility, safety, and accuracy of an intra-operative rather than preoperative SLN mapping in patients with primary vulvar cancer.

Methods

Patients with histologically confirmed squamous cell vulvar cancer and clinically FIGO stage Ib disease underwent intra-operative SLN mapping by intradermal injection of the nanocolloid around the tumor. SLN were identified and removed before a complete inguinofemoral lymphnode dissection was performed. Surgical and pathologic data on all patients were prospectively entered into a database.

Results

An SLN procedure was performed in 16 patients; 3 patients received unilateral lymphadenectomy, and 13 women underwent surgery on both groins. In all groins but 4 at least one SLN was clearly identified (detection rate 25/29, 86%). A median number of 2 SLN and 4 non-SLN per groin were removed. 3 of 16 patients (19%) had metastatic disease in the lymph nodes. There was no false negative SLN result.

Conclusion

Intra-operative SLN detection seems feasible in patients with early stage vulvar cancer. More patients need to be enrolled in this ongoing study before this more convenient technique can be considered safe.     

Conservation of the axilla: an audit of sentinel lymph node biopsy after a new start

Background

Four hundred twenty-eight patients with a diagnosis of breast cancer were assessed. All patients underwent axillary ultrasonographic scanning preoperatively or at the time of initial breast imaging. Suspicious axillary glands underwent core needle biopsy under ultrasonographic guidance.

Patients and Methods

The majority of patients were in the age range of 40 to 80 years. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) was performed in 360 patients.

Results

Sixty-eight patients had axillary clearance as a first axillary procedure. Of these patients, 55 had a preoperative diagnosis of a positive axillary gland in the axilla on ultrasonographically guided core needle biopsy, and 13 had clinically palpable axillary lymph glands. Seventy-one patients (21%) had a positive sentinel lymph node on histopathologic examination after hematoxylin and eosin (H & E) staining. Preoperative scans of the axilla had been reported as normal in these patients. In 68 patients, further axillary surgery was performed to clear the axilla; 24 of these patients (35%) had more positive glands in the axilla. In 44 patients (65%) the sentinel lymph glands were the only positive glands. Of 224 patients with a tumor size ≤ 20 mm, there were 30 patients (14%) who had a positive sentinel node. Of 136 patients with a tumor size > 20 mm, there were 41 patients (33%) with positive sentinel nodes.

Conclusions

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer allowed conservation of the axilla in 80% (289/360) of patients with negative sentinel lymph nodes in this study. Preoperative ultrasonographically guided core needle biopsy reduced the need for a second operation in 55 patients (13%).