Clinic and ambulatory heart rate in sustained and white-coat hypertension

BACKGROUND: Sustained and white-coat hypertensives show hypertension in the office setting but different blood pressure values outside the clinical environment. So far, only a few incomplete data on heart rate are available inside and outside the clinical setting in these groups of patient. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinic and ambulatory heart in sustained hypertensives, white-coat hypertensives and normotensives. METHODS: We selected 236 sustained hypertensives, 236 white-coat hypertensives and 236 normotensives matched for age, gender and body mass index, and with a similar occupation. The subjects had been submitted to clinic evaluation and the non-invasive monitoring of blood pressure and heart rate. White-coat hypertension was defined as clinic hypertension and a daytime blood pressure of less than 135/85 mmHg. RESULTS: The clinic heart rate was significantly higher in sustained hypertensives and white-coat hypertensives than in normotensives (76 +/- 11 versus 75.5 +/- 10 versus 70 +/- 9 beats/min [bpm], respectively, P < 0.05). The daytime heart rate was significantly higher in sustained hypertensives than in white-coat hypertensives and normotensives (79.4 +/- 10 versus 74.6 +/- 8.5 versus 74.5 +/- 8.5 bpm, respectively, P < 0.05), as were the night-time heart rate (67 +/- 8.5 versus 63 +/- 8 versus 63 +/- 8 bpm, respectively, P < 0.05) and 24 h heart rate (76.3 +/- 9 versus 72 +/- 7.8 versus 72 +/- 8 bpm, respectively, P < 0.05). When men and women were analyzed separately, the same trend was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The clinic heart rate is similar in sustained and white-coat hypertensives, but the ambulatory heart rate is lower in white-coat hypertensives. As ambulatory heart rate is more representative of 24 h heart rate load and may be a better indicator of the detrimental effect of heart rate, our findings suggest that white-coat hypertensives are at lower cardiovascular risk than sustained hypertensives.     

How good are standardized blood pressure recordings for diagnosing hypertension? A comparison between office and ambulatory blood pressure.

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was compared with office blood pressure in 48 normotensive, 81 borderline hypertensives and 35 untreated hypertensives. The studied groups were chosen from a geographically defined population of middle-aged men in southern Sweden. The mean 24-h ambulatory blood pressure values for the normotensives, borderline hypertensives and untreated hypertensives were 120/76, 127/82 and 140/92 mmHg, respectively. The diurnal mean ambulatory blood pressure in the three groups was 126/80, 134/86 and 146/96 mmHg, respectively. The percentage of 24-h diastolic blood pressure peaks greater than or equal to 95 mmHg in the groups were 7%, 22% and 53%, respectively. The corresponding values greater than or equal to 90 mmHg were 16%, 38% and 69%, respectively. In the untreated hypertensive group, there was a more pronounced (P less than 0.05) systolic blood pressure increase during the morning hours (0600-1000 h) than in the normotensive and borderline hypertensive groups. Fourteen per cent of the hypertensives showed normal blood pressure values during 24-h blood pressure monitoring. Fifteen per cent of the borderline hypertensives were normotensive during ambulatory blood pressure monitoring despite repeated office diastolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 90 mmHg. The opposite (increased blood pressure during ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and at screening but normal office blood pressure) was seen in 14% of the borderline hypertensives. Normotensives were characterized by lower mean blood pressure values, fewer blood pressure peaks and a lower systolic blood pressure increase during the morning hours than hypertensives in this study of middle-aged men. The established way of diagnosing hypertension, borderline hypertension and normotension correlated well with the results of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.     

Relationship between aortic stiffness and cardiovascular risk factors in a population of normotensives, white-coat normotensives, white-coat hypertensives, sustained hypertensives and diabetic patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) and office and ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) and other cardiovascular risk factors and to determine the discriminatory value of PWV in a large population including normotensive subjects (NT), white-coat normotensives (masked hypertension) (WCNT), and white-coat hypertensives (WCHT) compared to a group of treated and untreated hypertensive patients. METHODS: The study population included a total of 688 subjects aged from 18 to 80 years, with no previous cardiovascular events, who underwent 24 h ABP monitoring, biochemical evaluation and determination of PWV and left ventricular mass index (LVMI). Subjects were classified as true normotensives (NT, n=132; normal office and ABP values), WCNT (n=39; office BP < 140/90 and daytime BP > or =135 or > or =85 mmHg), WCHT (n=87; office BP > or =140 or > or =90 and daytime BP < 135/85 mmHg). Untreated (UT-HT, n=154) and treated (T-HT, n=171) hypertensive patients and type 2 diabetic patients (DM, n=102) were also studied. RESULTS: Values of PWV (m/s) in all groups were, in ascending order: NT (8.9 +/- 0.2) < WCHT (9.9 +/- 0.2) < T-HT (11.4 +/- 0.2) = WCNT (11.5 +/- 0.4) < UT-HT (11.9 +/- 0.3) < DM (12.6 +/- 0.4) (ANOVA, p = 0.043), and of LVMI (g/m2): NT (59 +/- 2) = WCHT (63 +/- 2) < WCNT (73 +/- 3) = T-HT (75 +/- 3) = UT-HT (77 +/- 3) < DM (84 +/- 4) (ANOVA, p < 0.05). The percentage of subjects with PWV values below the median (10.7 m/s) was higher (p < 0.02) in NT (81.8%) and WCHT (72.6%) than in UT-HT (49.2%), T-HT (43.6%), WCNT (47.6%) and DM (27.7%). In multiple regression analysis, taking PWV as the dependent variable, age (all groups), 24h systolic BP (UT-HT, T-HT, WCNT and DM) and 24h diastolic BP (NT and WCHT) were the variables that independently influenced the PWV value. CONCLUSIONS: Higher values of PWV occur in clinical situations associated with higher cardiovascular risk. This is in agreement with risk stratification based on ABP values but not on office BP values. Lower PWV and LVMI values occur in NT and WCHT subjects, supporting a low cardiovascular risk in these groups. By contrast, higher PWV values were associated with higher ABP values in DM, hypertensive patients and white-coat normotensives, i.e. clinical situations that are associated with higher cardiovascular risk, who in the present study also exhibited higher LVMI than subjects with normal ABP values.     

Amlodipine 2.5 mg once daily in older hypertensives: a Brazilian multi-centre study

OBJECTIVES: The use of low-dose amlodipine has not yet been well established in the elderly. This study therefore aimed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of low-dose amlodipine in elderly patients with Joint National Committee VI stage I or II hypertension. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-five hypertensive individuals (aged 66.3 +/- 5.3 years) received amlodipine 2.5 mg per day for 12 weeks before and after two periods of 4 weeks of placebo. At weeks 0, 12 and 16, patients were submitted to office, 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and home blood pressure measurement. RESULTS: Office systolic and diastolic blood pressure showed decreases at weeks 8 (153 +/- 17, 90 +/- 9 mmHg) and 12 (152 +/- 16, 90 +/- 9 mmHg) compared with weeks 0 (164 +/- 16, 99 +/- 6 mmHg) and 16 (162 +/- 19, 95 +/- 9 mmHg). During ambulatory monitoring, a decrease was observed in the average 24 h systolic and diastolic pressure at week 12 (143 +/- 13, 86 +/- 7 mmHg) compared with weeks 0 (155 +/- 15, 93 +/- 6 mmHg) and 16 (152 +/- 16, 92 +/- 8 mmHg). A daytime and night-time reduction in systolic and diastolic pressure was observed on home blood pressure monitoring at week 12 (146 +/- 16/88 +/- 8, 144 +/- 16/93 +/- 8 mmHg) compared with weeks 0 (159 +/- 17/94 +/- 8, 161 +/- 19/93 +/- 8 mmHg) and 16 (153 +/- 16/93 +/- 8, 154 +/- 17/92 +/- 8 mmHg). Adverse reactions were infrequent. CONCLUSIONS: Amlodipine at a dose of 2.5 mg per day showed efficacy and good tolerability in elderly hypertensives.     

Repeated office blood pressure controls reduce the prevalence of white-coat hypertension and detect a group of white-coat normotensive patients

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether repeated office blood pressure controls may change the prevalence of white-coat hypertension among hypertensive patients. METHODS: We studied 221 newly diagnosed, never-treated hypertensive patients, all men, aged 31-60 years. On the first visit, they underwent sitting blood pressure measurements (two readings were taken by mercury sphygmomanometer and averaged) and non-invasive 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) every 15 min. Thereafter, each patient made four further visits over an 8-week period. On each visit, three sitting readings were taken and averaged. On the last visit, ABPM was performed again. Subjects who had hypertension in the clinic but whose daytime ambulatory blood pressure was less than 134/90 mmHg were considered to have white-coat hypertension. RESULTS: On the first visit, all patients were, by definition, clinically hypertensive and ABPM detected a prevalence of white-coat hypertension of 25.8%. On the following visits, the prevalence of clinical hypertensive patients progressively declined; on the last visit, the 82.3% of all patients resulted yet clinical hypertensive: on ambulatory blood pressure 71.9% were sustained hypertensives, whereas 10.4 had white-coat hypertension. Of the patients originally labelled as hypertensive, 17.7% proved to be clinically normotensive: 13.6% had also daytime ambulatory blood pressure in the normal range, whereas 4.1% showed elevated blood pressure during daytime ABPM (white-coat normotensives). CONCLUSION: These data suggest that repeated office blood pressure controls in newly diagnosed hypertensives reduce the number of office hypertensive patients, reduce the number of white-coat hypertensive patients and detect a small group of white-coat normotensive patients.     

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring versus self-measurement of blood pressure at home: correlation with target organ damage

OBJECTIVE: Ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring and home blood pressure measurements predicted the presence of target organ damage and the risk of cardiovascular events better than did office blood pressure. METHODS: To compare these two methods in their correlation with organ damage, we consecutively included 325 treated (70%) or untreated hypertensives (125 women, mean age = 64.5 +/- 11.3) with office (three measurements at two consultations), home (three measurements morning and evening over 3 days) and 24-h ambulatory monitoring. Target organs were evaluated by ECG, echocardiography, carotid echography and detection of microalbuminuria. Data from 302 patients were analyzed. RESULTS: Mean BP levels were 142/82 mmHg for office, 135.5/77 mmHg for home and 128/76 mmHg for 24-h monitoring (day = 130/78 mmHg; night = 118.5/67 mmHg). With a 135 mmHg cut-off, home and daytime blood pressure diverged in 20% of patients. Ambulatory and Home blood pressure were correlated with organ damage more closely than was office BP with a trend to better correlations with home BP. Using regression analysis, a 140 mmHg home systolic blood pressure corresponded to a 135 mmHg daytime systolic blood pressure; a 133 mmHg daytime ambulatory blood pressure and a 140 mmHg home blood pressure corresponded to the same organ damage cut-offs (Left ventricular mass index = 50 g/m, Cornell.QRS = 2440 mm/ms, carotid intima media thickness = 0.9 mm). Home-ambulatory differences were significantly associated with age and antihypertensive treatment. CONCLUSION: We showed that home blood pressure was at least as well correlated with target organ damage, as was the ambulatory blood pressure. Home-ambulatory correlation and their correlation with organ damage argue in favor of different cut-offs, that are approximately 5 mmHg higher for systolic home blood pressure.     

Blood pressure on arising, morning blood pressure surge and blood pressure variability in white coat hypertensives and in matched normotensives and sustained hypertensives.

INTRODUCTION: It is still controversial whether subjects with white-coat hypertension (WCHT) exhibit higher cardiovascular risk compared to normotensive subjects (NT). In subjects with WCHT it is not known whether the abnormal blood pressure (BP) reaction in the office also occurs at other times of day, particularly on arising and immediately after waking, i.e. the times at which the majority of cardiovascular events are reported to occur. OBJECTIVE AND METHODS: To evaluate with 24h ambulatory BP measurement the values of morning BP surge, BP on arising and BP variability in subjects with WCHT in comparison with age-, gender- and weight-matched normotensives (BP) and untreated sustained hypertensives (BP). RESULTS: Groups of BP, WCHT and BP were matched for age, gender and body weight: BP: n=69, age 49 +/- 7 years, 54 % female, BMI 26 +/- 1, casual BP 126/79 +/- 5/4 mmHg, daytime BP 124/80 +/- 6/6 mmHg; WCHT: n=74, age 52 +/- 8 years, 57% female, BMI 26 +/- 2, casual BP 152/95 +/- 7/7 mmHg, daytime BP 126/80 +/- 5/6 mmHg; HT: n=79, age 53 +/- 7 years, 56% female, BMI 27 +/- 2, casual BP 154/97 +/- 9/8 mmHg, daytime BP 143/89 +/- 12/10 mmHg. Of the three groups, subjects with WCHT exhibited BP on arising (121/81 +/- 13/8 mmHg) similar to that of NTs (120/80 +/- 13/9 mmHg, NS), both significantly lower than that of HTs (137/92 +/- 17/10 mmHg, p < 0.01), suggesting the absence of an alerting BP reaction in WCHT at that time. By contrast, subjects with WCHT showed higher values of systolic morning BP surge vs. NTs (25 +/- 10 vs. 22 +/- 11 mmHg, p < 0.05), both lower than that observed in hypertensives (33 +/- 11 mmHg, p < 0.01 vs. NT and WCHT) and greater daytime variability (systolic BP standard variation), i.e. 12 2 vs. 10 +/- 2 mmHg, p < 0.05, both lower than that observed in hypertensives (14 +/- 3 mmHg, p < 0.01 vs. NT and WCHT). CONCLUSIONS: Although subjects with WCHT did not show any alerting blood pressure reaction on arising, morning BP surge and BP variability were greater in these subjects than in control normotensives, although lower than sustained hypertensives. Although this is still speculative, we cannot exclude the possibility that even a slight increase in morning BP surge might in the long term constitute an additional load on the circulation that could increase cardiovascular risk in subjects with WCHT compared to matched normotensives.     

Arterial distensibility in subjects with white-coat hypertension with and without diabetes or dyslipidaemia: comparison with normotensives and sustained hypertensives

BACKGROUND: Arterial distensibility can be assessed by measuring pulse-wave velocity (PWV). OBJECTIVE: To determine whether diabetes, smoking and dyslipidaemia were associated with greater than normal stiffness of aortic walls in subjects with white-coat hypertension. METHODS: Arterial distensibility was assessed by automatic measurement of carotid-femoral PWV in 35 healthy normotensives, 46 white-coat hypertensives (WCH, clinic blood pressures >140/90 mm Hg, daytime blood pressures <130/85 mm Hg) and 81 ambulatory hypertensives (clinic blood pressures >140/90 mmHg, daytime blood pressures > or =130 mm Hg systolic or > or =85 mm Hg diastolic, or both) all matched for age, sex and body mass index. Nineteen normotensives (subgroup A), 28 WCH (subgroup A) and 37 ambulatory hypertensives (subgroup A) had only one or no other major cardiovascular risk factor whereas 16 normotensives (subgroup B), 18 WCH (subgroup B) and 44 ambulatory hypertensives (subgroup B) had also some combination of non-insulin-dependent diabetes, a smoking habit and dyslipidaemia. RESULTS: Both for the WCH and for ambulatory hypertensives diabetes and dyslipidaemia (subgroups B) were associated with higher (P<0.04) PWV (11.6+/-0.3 and 12.8+/-0.3m/s, respectively) than for subgroups A (9.3+/-0.5 and 10.9+/-0.6 m/s, respectively). In contrast, PWV for WCH in subgroup A (9.3+/-0.5m/s) did not differ (P>0.35) from those for the normotensive subgroups A (9.2+/-0.3m/s) and B (9.6+/-0.4m/s). PWV was not correlated to levels of glycaemia, glycosylated haemoglobin and cholesterolaemia. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that, both for ambulatory hypertensives and for WCH, diabetes and dyslipidaemia are associated with an impairment of arterial distensibility that can entail a greater than normal cardiovascular risk, which might dictate a more than usually stringent treatment of concomitant risk factors and possibly of high blood pressure. In contrast, PWV in WCH of the subgroup A did not differ from those in normotensives, reinforcing the hypothesis that WCH is associated with a benign cardiovascular outcome in the absence of other cardiovascular risk factors.     

Sleep disturbance during ambulatory blood pressure monitoring of hypertensive patients

BACKGROUND: Hypertensive patients who fail to exhibit a normal fall in blood pressure at night may have a greater risk of target-organ damage. Sleep, with associated cessation of physical activity, is the principal determinant of nocturnal blood pressure 'dip'. OBJECTIVE: To ascertain whether hypertensive patients, who experience the discomfort of higher cuff-inflation pressures during ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, experience more interference with sleep, manifested by greater nocturnal physical activity. DESIGN: A retrospective case- control study. METHODS: Subjects were selected from a database of 475 patients who had undergone simultaneous 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and monitoring of physical activity with a wrist-mounted piezoelectric accelerometer. Sixty-one hypertensives (average daytime systolic blood pressure >/= 150 mmHg) were age matched to 61 subjects with average daytime systolic blood pressures 相似文献   

The Norwegian office-, home-, and ambulatory blood pressure study (NOHA)

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the use of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in comparison with home and office blood pressure in every-day general practice. METHODS: In a multicenter survey sixty-two practitioners previously unfamiliar with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring performed a total of 1162 (mean 18 +/- 16; range 3-94) 24-h ambulatory- and home blood pressure measurements in normotensive subjects or patients with untreated or treated hypertension. RESULTS: In subjects with office blood pressure <140/90 mmHg average 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (Tenso 24 monitors) was 126/79 mmHg, home blood pressure (Tenso Plus semiautomatic sphygmomanometers) was 128/ 84 mmHg, and office blood pressure (standard sphygmomanometer) was 130/82 mmHg. Patients with office blood pressure > or = 140/90 mmHg had 24-h ambulatory blood pressure averaging 141/88 mmHg, home blood pressure 149/93 mmHg, and office blood pressure 157/95 mmHg. The difference between office-, home-, and ambulatory blood pressure increased with age. Expected differences were found between the three blood pressure modalities according to indication of examination (borderline -, "white-coat" -, and therapy refractory hypertension). Indices of hypertension related end-organ damage were positively correlated with home and ambulatory blood pressure but not with office blood pressure. Overall the performance of home- and ambulatory blood pressure in this general practice setting was similar to that seen by specialized blood pressure units. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the practical utility of home- and ambulatory blood pressure measurement in every-day general practice. Both methods are easy to introduce and the quality of blood pressure data obtained in every-day general practice are comparable to those obtained in hypertension clinics and trial centers.     

Comparison between office and ambulatory blood pressure in young and elderly subjects with isolated systolic hypertension

BACKGROUND: It has been claimed that isolated systolic hypertension (ISH) in the elderly is not a sustained condition but a short-lasting increase in office systolic blood pressure magnified by arterial stiffness. DESIGN: Office and ambulatory blood pressures werecompared at baseline and after 3 months of observation of young and elderly subjects with ISH. METHODS: The study was carried out in 39 young (mean age 27.1+/-9.8 years) and 37 elderly patients (mean age 72.5+/-5.7 years). Office blood pressure was defined as the mean of six readings. All subjects underwent two non-invasive 24 h blood pressure monitorings performed 3 months apart and echocardiography (n = 50). RESULTS: The difference between office and mean 24 h systolic/diastolic blood pressure was 27.9/8.2 mmHg in the young and 18.9/6.9 mmHg in the elderly patients (P < 0.01 for systolic blood pressure). Twenty-four-hour (P < 0.001), daytime (P = 0.001) and night-time (P < 0.001) systolic blood pressures were higher in the elderly and the difference between daytime and night-time systolic blood pressure was greater in the young (P < 0.05). Office and ambulatory heart rates were significantly higher in the young subjects. The elderly patients showed a greater left ventricular wall thickness ( P = 0.005 for posterior wall; P < 0.005 for septum), relative wall thickness (P = 0.01) and left ventricular mass index (P = 0.001) and impaired left ventricular filling rate ( P = 0.05), whereas systolic performance and stroke volume were no different in the two groups. Due to the higher heart rate, cardiac output was greater in the young (P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: These data show that larger differences between office and ambulatory systolic blood pressure are not unique to elderly patients with ISH. Increased ambulatory blood pressure levels and a decreased nocturnal blood pressure fall were associated with left ventricular structural and functional abnormalities in the elderly subjects.     

Clinical prediction of normotension in borderline hypertensive men--a 10 year study

OBJECTIVE: To investigate 24-h ambulatory blood pressure measurements (ABPM) as a tool for long-term prediction of future blood pressure (BP) status in high normal and low stage 1 hypertensives. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 165 men from a population screening program with diastolic BP (DBP) 85-94 mmHg and a systolic BP (SBP) < 150 mmHg performed a 24-h ABPM. Ten years later, 120 participants (73%) returned for renewed measurements. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Blood pressure status at 10 years. RESULTS: At the 10-year follow-up, 53% of the participants were classified as hypertensive (HT) (BP > or = 140/90 or taking anti-hypertensive medication) and 47% were classified as normotensive (NT) (BP < 140/90 mmHg). There was no significant baseline differences in office SBP levels between those who were normotensive or hypertensive at follow-up (136/91 versus 138/92 mmHg), whereas both SBP and DBP night-time levels were significantly lower in the future normotensives as compared to the future hypertensives (107/69 versus 112/74 mmHg, P < 0.01). Using recommended normalcy night-time ABP levels of < 120/75 mmHg in addition to office BP (140/90) at baseline, over 85% of the subjects were correctly classified provided they met both clinic and ambulatory night-time criteria for HT and NT classification at baseline. CONCLUSION: The use of ABPM in addition to office BP's in patients with borderline hypertension greatly increases the possibility of identifying those individuals who are at a very small risk of developing future hypertension. This could potentially lead to considerable savings in both patient anxiety, physician time and resource consumption.     

'Reverse white-coat hypertension' in older hypertensives

OBJECTIVES: The role of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in the elderly is unclear. This study has examined differences between clinic and ambulatory blood pressure (BP) in a large cohort of older hypertensives, with particular respect to the factors influencing the direction and magnitude of this difference. DESIGN: The Second Australian National Blood Pressure Study (ANBP2) is a general practice-based randomized-outcome trial in 6083 older hypertensives treated with an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or diuretic-based regimen. Before starting treatment a subset of 713 patients (age range 65-83 years) had a 'successful' 26-hour ambulatory blood pressure recording with a SpaceLabs 90207 recorder. RESULTS: Average clinic BP (+/- SD) was 167 +/- 12/90 +/- 8 mmHg. Average daytime ambulatory BP was 157 +/- 15*/89 +/- 10* mmHg and night ambulatory BP was 137 +/- 16+/74 +/- 10+ mmHg (different from clinic BP: *P < 0.01;from daytime ambulatory BP: +P < 0.001). Twenty-one to 45% of all patients had higher daytime systolic or diastolic ambulatory BP than clinic readings, with smoking, previous treatment for hypertension and lower clinic BP being the main predictors of this 'reverse white-coat effect'. CONCLUSIONS: Although mean daytime ambulatory blood pressures were lower than clinic readings in this large cohort of untreated older hypertensives, a substantial proportion showed the reverse of the so-called 'white-coat effect'. These findings identify the important role for ABPM in the elderly, not only for avoiding overtreatment in those with typical 'white-coat hypertension' but also for ensuring adequate treatment is given to those with the reverse of this phenomenon.     

Blood Pressure in Middle-Aged Women: A Comparison Between Office-, Self-, and Ambulatory Recordings

A blood pressure screening was carried out in women aged 40-64 years in a geographically defined area in southern Sweden; the attendance was 72%. Middle-aged women classified as normotensives by standard criteria were found to differ from hypertensives also when blood pressure was recorded with non-invasive ambulatory technique; this was so when calculated for day, night, and 24 hours. The frequency of ambulatory blood pressure values ± 140/90 mmHg was also significantly lower in normotensives than in hypertensives. The established way of diagnosing hypertension and normotension thus correlated well with the results of ambulatory monitoring in women. Furthermore, women had their highest blood pressure in the late afternoon and not in the mornings, as previously shown in men. This was so in all three groups of women (normotensives, borderline hypertensives, and hypertensives). This difference leaves room for speculations about different types of stress load during the day in men and women.     

The Role of Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in the Evaluation of Adolescent Hypertension

We performed 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in a group of adolescents with hypertension induced by dynamic exercise and a group of normotensive controls. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was performed using a Del-Mar Avionics PIII recorder with readings taken every 7 1/2 minutes. There was little inter-individual variation in mean hourly blood pressure and the difference between mean hourly readings was not significant in hypertensives. Mean 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure was 130.2/80.7 mmHg for hypertensives and 115.2/70.8 in normotensives. Mean 24-hour variability was 18.3/12.9 mmHg in hypertensives and 14.6/11.5 in normotensives. There was no significant change in blood pressure or variability between daytime and evening for hypertensives. Normotensives showed a significant reduction in both BP and variability compared to hypertensives. In adolescents with systolic hypertension, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring confirmed a failure to reduce blood pressure following routine activity. This technique maybe used as a predictive marker of early, adult essential hypertension.     

Do we undertreat hypertensive smokers? A comparison between smoking and non-smoking hypertensives

The acute effect of smoking is a rise in blood pressure and heart rate. Nevertheless, in several epidemiologic studies, smokers tend to have a slightly lower office blood pressure than non-smokers. We studied the 24 h ambulatory blood pressure consecutively in hypertensive smokers (> or = 10 cigarettes per day, n = 26) and hypertensive non-smokers (n = 26) to test the hypothesis that smoking is associated with a rise in ambulatory blood pressure. There was no difference between smokers and non-smokers in office blood pressure (153.8 +/- 22.2/98.5 +/- 10.6 vs 149.0 +/- 16.1/96.9 +/- 11.6 mmHg). However, we found a statistically significant higher daytime systolic and diastolic blood pressure in smokers (153.7 +/- 16.2/96.1 +/- 9.5 vs 145.0 +/- 12.1/90.1 +/- 10.0 mmHg) than in non-smokers. Differences were also found for office-daytime differences and when studying patients on pharmacological antihypertensive treatment separately. Daytime heart rate was also significantly higher in smokers (86.6 +/- 9.4 vs 76.0 +/- 10.9). We conclude that smokers tend to be undertreated in that they have a higher daytime blood pressure than do non-smokers, a difference that is not recognized by measuring office blood pressure alone. We therefore recommend 24h ambulatory blood pressure measurement in smokers with essential hypertension.     

Relationship between ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and response of blood pressure in male hypertensive adolescents to exercise

BACKGROUND: High blood pressure in the young has been related to the development of hypertension in adults; hence the importance of identifying adolescents with the risk of developing it.OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and the response of blood pressure in adolescents to exercise. DESIGN: A prospective and cross-sectional study. METHODS: We classified 101 men aged 13-18 years as obese hypertensive, lean hypertensive, obese normotensive, and lean normotensive. Mean blood pressure and variability were measured with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, and expressed as 24 h, awake, and sleeping periods. Treadmill tests were also performed. RESULTS: Hypertensives and obese normotensives had higher ambulatory blood pressure monitoring values (P< 0.0001). Systolic blood pressure during sleep in obese subjects was significantly higher than that in lean usbjects (119.9 +/- 9 versus 113.6 +/- 8 mmHg, P < 0.001, obese hypertensives versus lean hypertensives; and 113.6 +/- 2 versus 103.0 +/- 2 mmHg, P < 0.002, obese normotensives versus lean normotensives) and nocturnal drop of systolic blood pressure was lower in obese subjects. We found a significant correlation between systolic blood pressure during ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and systolic blood pressure during moderate and maximal exercise for all periods (P < 0.0001). Blood pressure variability during awake period was higher in subjects with maximum exercise systolic blood pressure >/= 200 mmHg (7.4 +/- 2 versus 6.4 +/- 2%, P < 0.01).CONCLUSION: Systolic blood pressure measured by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is related to response of systolic blood pressure to exercise and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring can identify groups of subjects at greater than normal risk through their higher blood pressure during sleep. Greater than normal blood pressure variability in adolescents is an indicator of the risk of reaching abnormal exercise values of systolic blood pressure. Higher casual blood pressure than ambulatory blood pressure monitoring values for adolescents should be considered abnormal.     

Office blood pressure measurements overestimate blood pressure control in renal transplant patients

OBJECTIVE: As hypertension is an important risk factor for renal allograft failure, we aimed to assess blood pressure control in renal transplant patients with deteriorating graft function using different methods of blood pressure measurements. METHODS: Forty-nine patients with a graft survival of >1 year, and with more than a two-fold increase in urinary albumin excretion, and/or an increase in serum creatinine level >20% during the previous 12 months, were included. Office blood pressure and home BP were measured, and ambulatory blood pressures were obtained in all patients. RESULTS: The mean office blood pressure (133.2+/-16.3/81.7+/-9.6 mmHg) and 24 h ambulatory blood pressure (133.1+/-12.0/79.8+/-8.3 mmHg) were similar. Home blood pressure in the morning (144.2+/-23.3/87.1+/-12.7 mmHg) and evening (143.2+/-20.6/86.4+/-10.3 mmHg) were significantly higher than ambulatory blood pressure (P<0.001 for both). Only 18% of the patients exhibited a reduction of >or=10% in systolic blood pressure during nighttime while 39% had an overt rise. Adequate blood pressure control was found in 53% of the patients using office blood pressure (<140/90 mmHg), contrasting 29% using home blood pressure (<135/85 mmHg), and 16% using mean 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (<125/80 mmHg). These findings were substantiated by the use of receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Using the 24-h blood pressure as a standard, home blood pressure was superior to office blood pressure in estimating blood pressure control in renal transplant patients. Nocturnal hypertension, however, was observed frequently, adding important clinical information about blood pressure control in this high-risk population.     

Continued high risk of stroke in treated hypertensives in a general population: the Jichi Medical School Cohort study

Although it is confirmed that antihypertensive treatment for hypertension (HT) reduces stroke, it is uncertain whether the risk of stroke in controlled hypertensives is as low as that in normotensives. To address this question, we examined the risk of stroke in hypertensives with or without antihypertensive treatment in the general population. A total of 11,103 men and women were enrolled in for this multi-center, population-based cohort study. Subjects were divided into three categories: normotensives (blood pressure <140/90 mmHg), treated hypertensives, and non-treated hypertensives (blood pressure >or=140/90 mmHg without antihypertensive treatment). The treated hypertensives were divided into controlled and uncontrolled HT groups. The non-treated hypertensives were also divided into two groups: mild HT, and moderate or severe HT. The mean follow-up duration was 10.7 years. Risk of all stroke was significantly higher in the hypertensives than in the normotensives (treated HT: hazard ratio=3.00 in men and 3.34 in women, 95% confidence interval=2.00-4.51 in men and 2.29-4.87 in women; non-treated HT: 2.56, 1.83-3.57 in men and 1.93, 1.35-2.76 in women). Risk of stroke in controlled treated hypertensives was about three times as high as that in normotensives (2.96, 1.66-5.26 in men and 3.69, 2.20-6.17 in women). Risk of stroke was about 2.5 times higher in individuals with hyperglycemia than in those with normoglycemia among both treated hypertensive men and women. In conclusion, compared with normotensives, hypertensives of all categories had a significantly higher risk of stroke. Residual confounding might have affected the result that risk of stroke was higher in controlled treated HT than in non-treated mild HT. Moreover, it is important to control blood pressure and blood glucose in hypertensives in order to reduce the risk of stroke.     

Limited (6-h) ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is a valid replacement for the office blood pressure by trained nurse clinician in the diagnosis of hypertension

OBJECTIVE: To assess the ability of limited ambulatory blood pressure monitoring as a valid replacement for office blood pressure measurement done to American Heart Association criteria in diagnosing hypertension. METHODS: In all, 105 adults, who had been referred for limited ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, participated in the study. Limited ambulatory blood pressure monitoring consisted of 6 h of blood pressure measurement while ambulatory at the Mayo Clinic, using a SpaceLabs 90207 (SpaceLabs Medical, Issaquah, Washington, USA) collecting six readings per hour for the period of observation. The study participants gave consent for three additional consecutive office blood pressure measurements, using a validated aneroid device, done to American Heart Association criteria, by a single hypertension nurse specialist. RESULTS: Mean systolic blood pressure by limited ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was 137.9+/-14.2 mmHg and for the nurse, 137.9+/-20.1 mmHg. Mean diastolic blood pressure by limited ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was 81.5+/-9.7 mmHg and for the nurse, 74.3+/-11.9 mmHg. The intermethod difference for systolic blood pressure was 0.03+/-12.5 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure, -7.2+/-8.0 mmHg. Using <140/90 as criteria factor, limited ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and the trained nurse agreed 77% of the time on whether the patient was hypertensive. This agreement increased to 81% if the participant's referral blood pressure was >or=140/90. CONCLUSIONS: Limited ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is an excellent replacement for office blood pressure, done to American Heart Association criteria, in diagnosing hypertension. This avoids issues of variability introduced by the observers, such as digit preference and bias, and increases reproducibility of blood pressure measurements. The appropriate normal value for limited ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is <140/90 mmHg compared with <135/85 mmHg used in 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.