Levofloxacin- versus metronidazole-based rescue therapy for H. pylori infection in Japan

BACKGROUND: The ideal second-line treatment regimens for Helicobacter pylori infection may differ between the areas, countries and races. AIM: The aim was to confirm which was the better regimen for second-line therapy after treatment failure with a standard triple therapy in Japan, a high dosage of levofloxacin- or metronidazole-based therapy. PATIENTS: Sixty outpatients with persistent H. pylori infection after a standard triple therapy were enrolled in this prospective, open-label and randomised trial. METHODS: The subjects were randomly administered levofloxacin (300 mg b.d.)- or metronidazole (500 mg b.d.)-based therapy with lansoprazole (30 mg b.d.) and amoxicillin (1000 mg b.d.) for 7 days, and the cure rates and side effects were analysed. Antimicrobial susceptibility was also examined before second-line therapy using the E-test. RESULTS: Good compliance was obtained without severe side effects in both the groups except for two patients. The cure rates, expressed as intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses, respectively, were 70.0 and 72.4% in the levofloxacin group, and 96.7 and 100% in the metronidazole group. Each regimen often overcame even clarithromycin-resistant strains. CONCLUSION: Metronidazole-based triple therapy is recommended as second-line therapy in Japan, and levofloxacin-based therapy can be an alternative treatment option.     

Helicobacter pylori eradication using tetracycline and furazolidone versus amoxicillin and azithromycin in lansoprazole based triple therapy: an open randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Optimal anti-Helicobacter pylori treatment has not yet been established. AIM: To evaluate H. pylori eradication using tetracycline and furazolidone versus amoxicillin and azithromycin in lansoprazole based triple therapy in northeastern of Brazil. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and four patients with H. pylori infection, as determined by rapid urease testing and histology, were randomly assigned to receive either: lansoprazole (30 mg q.d.), tetracycline (500 mg q.i.d.), and furazolidone (200 mg t.i.d.) for 7 days (LTF; n = 52); or lansoprazole (30 mg b.i.d.) and amoxicillin (1 g b.i.d.) for 1 week, plus azithromycin (500 mg q.d.) for the first 3 days (LAAz; n = 52). H. pylori eradication was assessed 3 months following completion of therapy by means of rapid urease testing, histology and a 14C-urea breath test. RESULTS: H. pylori eradication was achieved in 46 of 52 (88.4%, 95% CI: 77.5%-95.1%) patients in LTF group and in 14 of 52 (26.9%, 95% CI: 16.2%-40,1%) patients in LAAz group. On a per-protocol analysis, eradication rates were 91.8% (95% CI: 81.4%-97.3%) and 28.5% (95% CI: 17.2%-42.3%), respectively in LTF and LAAz groups. CONCLUSION: The LAAz regimen yielded unacceptably low eradication rates. On the other hand, the LTF scheme represents a suitable alternative for H. pylori eradication.     

Ranitidine bismuth citrate-based triple therapies as a second-line therapy for Helicobacter pylori in Turkish patients

BACKGROUND: Quadruple therapy with a proton pump inhibitor, bismuth, metronidazole and tetracycline is recommended as the optimal second-line therapy of Helicobacter pylori infection in the Maastricht Consensus Report. The aim of the present paper was to evaluate the efficacy of ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC)-based regimens as second-line therapies after failure of the standard Maastricht triple therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and sixteen H. pylori-positive patients were given omeprazole 20 mg b.d., clarithromycin 500 mg b.d., and amoxicillin 1 g b.d for 10 days. Patients remaining H. pylori-positive (n = 29) were combined with 27 patients enrolled after an initial eradication failure from proton-pump inhibitor (PPI), amoxicillin and clarithromycin therapy for at least 7 days and were randomly given one of the following second-line 10-day treatments: RBC 400 mg b.d., amoxicillin 1 g b.d and clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. (RAC group, n = 28) and RBC 400 mg b.d., metronidazole 500 mg b.d and tetracycline 500 mg b.d. (RMT group, n = 28). Eradication was assessed by either histology and rapid urease test or (13)C urea breath test 8 weeks after therapy. RESULTS: The eradication rate of first-line Maastricht therapy was 67% for intention-to-treat analysis (95% confidence interval [CI]: 58-75). Per-protocol and intention-to-treat eradication was achieved in 60.7% of patients (95%CI: 42-79) in the RAC group and in 85.7% of patients (95%CI: 73-98) in the RMT group (P = 0.03). Fifty-three percent of patients in the RAC and 50% of patients in the RMT group experienced at least one slight side-effect (P = 0.6). CONCLUSIONS: RMT is an effective and well-tolerated second-line therapy after H. pylori eradication failure from PPI, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin.     

Dual therapy using a double dose of lansoprazole with amoxicillin versus triple therapy using a double dose of lansoprazole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin to eradicate Helicobacter pylori infection: results of a prospective randomized open study

Objectives: The eradication of Helicobacter pylori is recommended in duodenal ulcer disease. The aim of this randomized open trial was to evaluate and compare H. pylori eradication and safety after a dual therapy consisting of lansoprazole (30 mg b.i.d .) and amoxicillin (1 g b.i.d .) versus a triple therapy consisting of lansoprazole (30 mg b.i.d .), amoxicillin (1 g b.i.d .), and clarithromycin (500 mg b.i.d .) administered from day 1 to day 14.
Methods: All patients with an ulcer received lansoprazole (30 mg) from day 15 to day 28. H. pylori status was determined from antral biopsies using histology, culture, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) upon inclusion and 1–3 months after the end of the treatment.
Results: Of the 50 patients included in the study, five did not adhere to the protocol. H. pylori eradication was obtained in 37.5% of the patients receiving lansoprazole-amoxicillin ( n = 9 /24) and in 95.2% of the patients receiving lansoprazole-amoxicillin-clarithromycin ( n = 20 /21, p < 0.0002 ). Minor side effects appeared in 8.3% of the cases during dual therapy ( n = 2 /24) and in 52% during triple therapy ( n = 13 /22, p < 0.001 ). These side effects consisted mainly of diarrhea and a metallic taste.
Conclusion: Concommitant administration of double doses of lansoprazole with amoxicillin and clarithromycin is very efficacious against H. pylori infection compared with dual therapy.     

Efficacy of metronidazole for the treatment of clarithromycin-resistant <Emphasis Type="Italic">Helicobacter pylori</Emphasis> infection in a Japanese population

Background Eradication of Helicobacter pylori has become a common treatment for several diseases. There is an increase in antibiotic-resistant strains, which causes the failure of eradication. The aim of this study was to investigate the usefulness of metronidazole for the treatment of H. pylori infection in patients who failed eradication therapy.Methods Seventy H. pylori-positive patients who had failed eradication treatment with first-line triple therapy, which consisted of a proton pump inhibitor, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin, were enrolled into the study. Before the second-line therapy, patients underwent endoscopy to obtain H. pylori strains to test susceptibility to antibiotics. Lansoprazole (30mg b.d.), amoxicillin (750mg b.d.), and metronidazole (250mg b.d.) were administered for 1 week, and the result was tested by ¹³C-UBT.Results H. pylori was isolated from 62 patients, and 52 of them (83.9%) were clarithromycin resistant. There was no amoxicillin- or metronidazole-resistant strain. No major adverse effects were seen, and all the patients completed the 1-week regimen. The eradication rates of lansoprazole-amoxicillin-metronidazole were 96.2% (51/53; 95% CI, 87.0%–99.5%) using both intention-to-treat analysis and per protocol analysis.Conclusions Lansoprazole-amoxicillin-metronidazole triple therapy is an effective and promising second-line H. pylori eradication therapy in a north Japanese population, which has a low frequency of metronidazole resistance.     

Bismuth-based quadruple therapy using a single capsule of bismuth biskalcitrate,metronidazole, and tetracycline given with omeprazole versus omeprazole,amoxicillin, and clarithromycin for eradication of Helicobacter pylori in duodenal ulcer patients: a prospective,randomized, multicenter,North American trial

OBJECTIVES: This multicenter, randomized, active-controlled trial assessed efficacy of bismuth-based quadruple therapy with omeprazole, bismuth biskalcitrate, metronidazole, and tetracycline (OBMT) using a single-triple capsule of BMT compared with triple therapy with omeprazole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin (OAC) in treatment of patients with Helicobacter pylori infection and duodenal ulcers. METHODS: Patients with active duodenal ulcer or diagnosed within the past 5 yr and with infection documented by (13)C-urea breath test plus histology or culture were randomly assigned to 10-day course of OBMT using a single-triple capsule containing bismuth biskalcitrate 140 mg, metronidazole 125 mg, and tetracycline 125 mg given as three capsules q.i.d. with omeprazole 20 mg b.i.d., or a 10-day course of OAC, omeprazole 20 mg plus amoxicillin 1 g plus clarithromycin 500 mg, all b.i.d. Eradication was confirmed by two negative urea breath tests at >1 month and >2 months after therapy. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-eight patients received OBMT and 137 OAC. Modified intent-to-treat eradication rates were 87.7% for OBMT and 83.2% for OAC (95% CI = -3.9%-12.8%; p = 0.29). OBMT eradicated 91.7% metronidazole-sensitive and 80.4% metronidazole-resistant strains (p = 0.06). OAC eradicated 92.1% clarithromycin sensitive and 21.4% clarithromycin-resistant strains (p < 0.001). Adverse events occurred in 58.5% of OBMT patients and 59.0% of OAC patients. CONCLUSIONS: OBMT regimen using the single-triple capsule is as efficacious and well-tolerated as the widely used OAC regimen for H. pylori eradication. This OBMT therapy largely overcomes H. pylori metronidazole resistance, present in 40% of patients in this study.     

Clarithromycin-based triple therapy for non-resistant Helicobacter pylori infection. How long should it be given?

BACKGROUND: We have previously reported mixed infection with wild-type (sensitive) and mutant (resistant) Helicobacter pylori strains using a PCR-based preferential homo-duplex formation assay (PCR-PHFA) to detect gene mutations associated with clarithromycin resistance. Half of the cases with mixed infection were determined as sensitive by conventional MIC assessment and yet failed to respond to clarithromycin-based therapy. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of clarithromycin-based triple therapy in patients infected exclusively with wild-type strains as determined by PCR-PHFA. METHODS: Ninety patients who had pure wild-type H. pylori infection were randomly assigned to receive clarithromycin (200 mg b.i.d.), amoxicillin (500 mg q.i.d.) and lansoprazole (30 mg b.i.d.) for either 5 days or 7 days (n = 48 and n = 42, respectively). The outcome of eradication was assessed by [13C] urea breath test. RESULTS: Eradication was achieved in 36/48 (75%) versus 39/42 (93%) by intention-to-treat analysis (P = 0.02), and in 36/45 (80%) versus 39/40 (98%) by per protocol analysis (P = 0.01), for the 5-day and 7-day protocols, respectively. Compliance and the incidence of untoward effects were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Seven-day administration is necessary and sufficient for the triple therapy with clarithromycin, amoxicillin and lansoprazole in patients with pure wild-type H. pylori infection.     

Recent success of pantoprazole -or lansoprazole- based clarithromycin plus amoxicillin treatment in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: There are some reports showing that resistance of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) to clarithromycin has increased in recent years. We aimed to investigate the current success of a most popular first-line eradication regimen by using two different proton pump inhibitors: lansoprazole and pantoprazole. METHODS: Ninety patients with H. pylori-positive functional dyspepsia were randomized to receive pantoprazole 40 mg b.i.d. or lansoprazole 30 mg b.i.d. in addition to amoxicillin 1,000 mg and clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily for 14 days in a multicenter study. H. pylori infection was determined by histological examination and a rapid urease test. A follow-up endoscopy was performed to assess the H. pylori eradication six weeks after the end of therapy. RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients completed the study protocol properly. The H. pylori eradication rates according to per protocol analysis were 70% in group pantoprazole, amoxicillin and clarithromycin (28/40) and 69.2% in group pantoprazole, amoxicillin and clarithromycin (27/39). The eradication rates according to intention to treat analysis were 62.2% and 60% in lansoprazole, amoxicillin, clarithromycin, pantoprazole, amoxicillin, clarithromycin groups, respectively. The eradication rates were similar in both protocols (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The most popular first-line eradication protocols of H. pylori achieved only a moderate success in the current study. Alternative therapy options are needed instead of clarithromycin-based triple treatment for eradication of H. pylori. The choice of proton pump inhibitor is not important in the eradication rate of H. pylori.     

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing before first-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with dual or triple antibiotic resistance

AIM To evaluate the efficacy of antimicrobial susceptibilityguided therapy before first-line treatment for infection in patients with dual or triple antibiotic resistance.METHODS A total of 1034 patients infected by Helicobacter pylori(H. pylori) during 2013-2014 were tested for antimicrobial susceptibility. 157 of 1034(15%) patients showed resistance to two(127/1034; 12%) and to three(30/1034; 3%) antibiotics. Sixty-eight patients with dual H. pylori-resistance(clarithromycin, metronidazole or levofloxacin) were treated for 10 d with triple therapies: OAL(omeprazole 20 mg b.i.d., amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d., and levofloxacin 500 mg b.i.d.) 43cases, OAM(omeprazole 20 mg b.i.d., amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d., and metronidazole 500 mg b.i.d.) 12 cases and OAC(omeprazole 20 mg b.id., amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d., and clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d.) 13 cases based on the antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Twelve patients showed triple H. pylori-resistance(clarithromycin, metronidazole and levofloxacin) and received for 10 d triple therapy with OAR(omeprazole 20 mg b.id., amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d., and rifabutin 150 mg b.i.d.). Eradication was confirmed by 13C-urea breath test. Adverse effects and compliance were assessed by a questionnaire. RESULTS Intention-to-treat eradication rates were: OAL(97.6%), OAM(91.6%), OAC(92.3%) and OAR(58.3%). Cure rate was significantly higher in na?ve patients treated with OAR-10 compared to patients who had two or three previous treatment failures(83% vs 33%). Adverse events rates for OAL, OAM, OAC and OAR were 22%, 25%, 23% and 17%, respectively, all of them mild-moderate. CONCLUSION Antimicrobial susceptibility-guided triple therapies during 10 d for first-line treatment leads to an eradication rate superior to 90% in patients with dual antibiotic H. pylori resistance.     

Evaluation of three different proton pump inhibitors with amoxicillin and metronidazole in retreatment for Helicobacter pylori infection

GOALS: We compared the eradication results of retreatment of eradication with proton pump inhibitor (PPI) plus amoxicillin and metronidazole for patients with Helicobacter pylori infection not eradicated by initial treatment with PPI plus amoxicillin and clarithromycin. BACKGROUND: In Japan, the guideline proposes that the use of metronidazole in a triple therapy containing PPI, PPI plus amoxicillin and metronidazole is desirable in retreatment. However, there are no reports comparing various retreatment using different PPIs. METHODS: After initial treatment failure with a PPI plus amoxicillin and clarithromycin, 169 patients were randomized to a PPI (rabeprazole, lansoprazole, or omeprazole) plus amoxicillin and metronidazole given b.i.d. for 7 days. RESULTS: Pretreatment susceptibility testing showed a high level of clarithromycin resistance (78%). The over all eradication rates were similar with the 3 PPIs, 91.1% range 90.1 to 91.4 with intention-to-treat analysis. The presence of metronidazole resistance reduced the eradication rate by approximately 40% (from 96.6% to 57.1%, P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In Japan, the combination of a PPI plus amoxicillin and metronidazole provide excellent eradication rates after initial treatment failure with a PPI plus amoxicillin and clarithromycin. The results with metronidazole resistant strains are less satisfactory and pretreatment susceptibility testing may become needed if the prevalence of metronidazole resistant H. pylori increase.     

Eradication rates of helicobacter pylori infection with second-line treatment: non-ulcer dyspepsia compared to peptic ulcer disease

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Initial proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is less effective in patients with nonulcer dyspepsia (NUD) than those with peptic ulcer disease (PUD). To date, there have been no studies on the difference in eradication rates in NUD compared to PUD with regard to second-line therapy. Therefore, we retrospectively analyzed the difference in eradication rates of a second-line quadruple therapy for NUD and PUD patients. METHODOLOGY: Between June 2003 and December 2005, patients who failed to respond to initial PPI-based triple therapy, received 7 days of quadruple therapy (PPI b.i.d., bismuth 300mg q.i.d., metronidazole 500mg t.i.d., tetracycline 500mg q.i.d.) as a second-line treatment regimen. Four weeks after the completion of the course of medication, a 13C-urea breath test was performed for detection of H. pylori. RESULTS: A total of 87 patients received second-line quadruple therapy. Of these, 43 patients had NUD and 44 patients had PUD (19 gastric ulcers, 23 duodenal ulcers, 2 both ulcers). The eradication rates were 76.7% (33/43) in the NUD group and 90.9% (40/44) in the PUD group by per-protocol analysis. Therefore, the eradication rates in the NUD group were significantly lower than those in the PUD group (p = 0.034). CONCLUSIONS: A 7-day bismuth-based second-line quadruple therapy for H. pylori infection was less effective in patients with NUD than those with PUD. Therefore, a more potent second-line treatment regimen or extension of treatment duration of quadruple therapy should be considered for the eradication of H. pylori in patients with NUD.     

Helicobacter pylori infection: a randomized, controlled study comparing 2 rescue therapies after failure of standard triple therapies

Antibiotic resistance to amoxicillin in second-line eradication therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection is much less frequent than resistance to metronidazole. We conducted a randomized, controlled study to compare the efficacies of standard quadruple rescue therapy and a new therapy with amoxicillin replacing metronidazole for patients failing first-line eradication treatment. We randomly assigned 120 patients who failed H. pylori eradication using a proton pump inhibitor plus clarithromycin and amoxicillin to undergo a 1-week rescue therapy with esomeprazole, bismuth subcitrate, and tetracycline plus either metronidazole (EBTM group, n = 62) or amoxicillin (EBTA group, n = 58). We used follow-up endoscopy 8 weeks after the end of treatment to assess the treatment response. We also examined and analyzed antibiotic resistances and CYP2C19 genotypes. Intention-to-treat analysis demonstrated that the EBTA group had a significantly lower eradication rate than the EBTM group (62% vs. 81%, respectively, p = 0.02). Per-protocol analysis showed similar results (64% vs. 83%, p = 0.01). However, the EBTA group had less frequency of adverse events than the EBTM group (19% vs. 44%, p < 0.01). Both groups had good drug compliance (both 97%). Antibiotic susceptibility tests showed that the frequency of amoxicillin-resistant strains was much less than that of metronidazole-resistant strains (0% vs. 54%, respectively), and there were no significant differences between H. pylori eradication rates and antibiotic resistances. In conclusion, EBTA quadruple therapy demonstrated a lower eradication rate than standard EBTM therapy in second-line rescue treatment. The discrepancy between in vitro antibiotic susceptibility and in vivo eradication response is probably due to drug interactions between combined antibiotics or some unknown causes, and should not be neglected in H. pylori therapy.     

Combinations containing amoxicillin-clavulanate and tetracycline are inappropriate for Helicobacter pylori eradication despite high in vitro susceptibility

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present paper was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of amoxicillin-clavulanate and tetracycline-based quadruple therapy as an alternative second-line treatment for H. pylori infection. METHODS: The study subjects consisted of 54 patients infected with H. pylori, in whom initial triple therapy had failed. Subjects were randomized to receive the following 7-day therapies: (i) pantoprazole 40 mg b.i.d., tripotassium dicitrate bismuthate 300 mg q.i.d., amoxicillin-clavulanate 1000 mg b.i.d., and tetracycline 500 mg q.i.d. (PBAT); or (ii) pantoprazole 40 mg b.i.d., tripotassium dicitrate bismuthate 300 mg q.i.d., metronidazole 500 mg t.i.d., and tetracycline 500 mg q.i.d. (PBMT). Eradication rates based on antibiotic susceptibility, drug compliance and side-effect rates were evaluated and compared. RESULTS: The H. pylori eradication rates were 16.0%/17.4% with PBAT and 65.5%/70.4% with PBMT by intention-to-treat (P<0.001) and per-protocol analyses (P<0.001), respectively. In patients who received PBAT, the eradication rates were only 16.7% (2/12) for both amoxicillin and tetracycline-susceptible H. pylori strains. Drug compliance and side-effect rates were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Despite high individual in vitro antimicrobial activity, amoxicillin-clavulanate and tetracycline-based quadruple therapy showed low eradication rates, which strongly suggests that it should not be considered as a therapeutic option for H. pylori eradication.     

Efficacy of levofloxacin-based triple therapy as second-line Helicobacter pylori eradication]

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Bismuth-based quadruple therapy for second-line eradication treatment achieves the eradication rate ranging from 70% to 81% due to antimicrobial resistance and poor compliance. The aim of this study was to compare the eradication rate of levofloxacin-based triple therapy with that of bismuth-based quadruple therapy in second-line Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication therapy. METHODS: Seventy-six outpatients with persistent H. pylori infection after first-line triple therapy were enrolled in this prospective randomized trial. The subjects were randomized to receive levofloxacin 300 mg, amoxicillin 1 g, and pantoprazole 20 mg, given twice daily for 7 days (LAP group), or metronidazole 500 mg twice, tetracycline 500 mg four times, and pantoprazole 20 mg twice, bismuth subcitrate 600 mg twice daily for 7 days (MTPB group). Eradication was confirmed with (13)C-urea breath test or rapid urease test 4 weeks after the cessation of therapy. RESULTS: Among Seventy-six patients initially included, eleven were lost during follow-up. The eradication rates, expressed as intention to treat (ITT) and per protocol (PP) analyses, were 51.6% and 53.3% in the LAP group, and 48.9% and 62.9% in the MTPB group, respectively. There was no significant difference in H. pylori eradication rates between the two groups (p=0.815 by ITT, p=0.437 by PP). LAP regimen was better tolerated than MTPB regimen with lower incidence of side effects (10.0% versus 31.4%, p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: H. pylori eradication rates of levofloxacin-based triple therapy and bismuth-based quadruple therapy were not significantly different in second-line H. pylori eradication therapy, and low incidence of side effects was observed in levofloxacin-based triple therapy.     

One-week versus two-week H2-receptor antagonist in combination with amoxicillin and tinidazole for eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Eradication regimens combining two antibiotics with a proton pump inhibitor have been studied intensively in Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection; however, only a few reports have focused on the role of H2-receptor antagonists (H2-RAs) in eradication therapy. The mechanism involved in the synergy between antibiotics and H2RAs are still elusive. So we compared the efficacy of two regimens: a 1-week or 2-week course of high-dose H2-RA-based triple therapy in patients with H. pylori infection, and assessed the impact of primary resistance for metronidazole on the treatment outcome. METHODOLOGY: One hundred and twenty patients with peptic ulcers and nonulcer dyspepsia were randomly assigned to a one-week course of famotidine 40mg b.i.d., amoxicillin lg b.i.d. and tinidazole 500 mg b.i.d. (FAT1 group; n = 60) or a 2-week course of famotidine 40 mg b.i.d., amoxicillin lg b.i.d. and tinidazole 500 mg b.i.d. (FAT2 group; n = 60). Upper endoscopy was performed prior to treatment and at least 4 weeks after completion of treatment and discontinuation of the antisecretory therapy. H. pylori status was assessed by biopsy urease test, histology and culture. RESULTS: In the intention-to-treat analysis, eradication of H. pylori was achieved in 38 of 60 patients (63.3%; 95% CI: 51-76%) in the FAT1 group, compared to 48 of 60 patients (80%; 95% CI: 70-92%) in the FAT2 group (NS). In the per protocol analysis, eradication therapy was achieved in 38 of 54 patients (70.4%; 95% CI: 58-82%) in the FAT1 group and 48 of 53 patients (90.6%; 95% CI: 83-98%) in the FAT2 group (p < 0.05). The overall eradication rates for strains susceptible and resistant to metronidazole were 79.7% (95% CI: 71-89%) vs. 60% (95% CI: 44-74%) in the intention-to-treat analysis (p = 0.016) and 84% (95% CI: 76-92%) vs. 71.9% (95% CI: 56-88%) in the per protocol analysis (p = 0.12). Seven patients in the FAT1 group and six patients in the FAT2 group available for follow-up reported adverse events (11.7% and 10% respectively) without necessity of discontinuation of the study medications. Serious adverse events were not observed. CONCLUSIONS: A 2-week course of high-dose H2-RA-based triple therapy is well tolerated and sufficiently effective in eradicating H. pylori infection. Presence of metronidazole resistance has a negative impact on the treatment efficacy.     

Comparative study: Vonoprazan and proton pump inhibitors in Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy

AIM To compare the effectiveness and safety of vonoprazan-based therapy with proton pump inhibitor(PPI)-based therapies to treat Helicobacter pylori(H. pylori).METHODS We retrospectively analysed data from first-line(vonoprazan or PPI with 200 mg clarithromycin and 750 mg amoxicillin twice daily for 7 d)(n = 1353) and second-line(vonoprazan or PPI with 250 mg metronidazole and 750 mg amoxicillin twice daily for 7 d)(n = 261) eradication treatments for H. pylori- positive patients with associated gastrointestinal diseases from April 2014 to December 2015 at Hattori Clinic, Japan. The primary endpoint was the eradication rate, which was assessed with a full analysis set. The secondary endpoints were adverse events and related factors.RESULTS After the first-line treatments, the eradication rates for vonoprazan, esomeprazol, rabeprazole, and lansoprazole were 87.9%(95%CI: 84.9%-90.5%), 71.6%(95%CI: 67.5%-75.5%), 62.9%(95%CI: 52.0%-72.9%), and 57.3%(95%CI: 50.4%-64.1%), respectively. The vonoprazan eradication rate was significantly higher than that of the PPIs(P 0.01). Interestingly, smoking did not affect the H. pylori eradication rate in the vonoprazan group(P = 0.34), whereas it decreased the rates in the PPI groups(P = 0.013). The incidence of adverse events in the vonop-razan group was not different from the PPI group(P = 0.054), although the vonoprazan group exhibited a wider range of adverse events. Vonoprazan-based triple therapy was highly effective as a second-line treatment, with an eradication rate similar to that of PPI-based therapy.CONCLUSION Vonoprazan might be superior to PPIs in first-line H. pylori therapy, particularly for smokers. However, caution is required due to possible adverse events.     

The efficacy of levofloxacin based triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication]

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The failure rates of first and second line therapies of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication range from 15 to 20%. This study was aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of levofloxacin based triple therapy compared with standard triple or quadruple therapy for H. pylori eradication in Korea. METHODS: We enrolled two hundred and sixty seven patients with presence of H. pylori infection. One hundred and forty-one patients were treated with levofloxacin based triple therapy (LAP; levofloxacin, amoxicillin, proton pump inhibitor; PPI), and 126 patients were treated with standard triple therapy (CAP; clarithromycin, amoxicillin, PPI). We retreated the patients who had failed in H. pylori eradication with standard quadruple second-line therapy (MTPB; metronidazole, tetracycline, PPI, bismuth subcitrate) or levofloxacin based therapy (LAP or LCP; levofloxacin, clarithromycin, PPI). RESULTS: In first line therapy of H. pylori eradication, the eradication rates of levofloxacin based triple therapy and standard triple therapy were 69.8% and 74.0% respectively (p=0.52). In second-line therapy, the eradication rate of levofloxacin based triple therapy and standard quadruple therapy were 62.5% and 40.0% respectively (p=0.34). CONCLUSIONS: Levofloxacin based triple therapy is effective as standard regimen to eradicate H. pylori infection and is useful for an alternative rescue therapy as well.     

Bismuth-based quadruple therapy with bismuth subcitrate, metronidazole, tetracycline and omeprazole in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori.

BACKGROUND: A previous study showed that 14 days of qid bismuth-based triple therapy with tetracycline 500 mg, metronidazole 250 mg and colloidal bismuth subcitrate 120 mg resulted in excellent Helicobacter pylori eradication rates (89.5%). The present study looked at a shorter treatment period by adding omeprazole and by reducing the dose of tetracycline. METHODS: One hundred sixty-one patients with H pylori confirmed by histology and (13)carbon urea breath test were included in the study. They were treated for seven days with bismuth subcitrate 120 mg plus metronidazole 250 mg plus tetracycline 250 mg qid plus omeprazole 20 mg bid (OBMT). Patients were 18 to 75 years of age and had dyspepsia with or without a history of peptic ulcer. Patients with irritable bowel syndrome, active ulcer or previous attempt at eradication, or those who had used antibiotics or antiulcer drugs in the previous 30 days were excluded. Eradication was determined by two (13)carbon urea breath tests done one and three months, respectively, after treatment. Strains with minimal inhibitory concentrations of 8 microg/mL or higher were considered to be resistant to metronidazole. RESULTS: The overall per protocol eradication rate was 84%-89.5% in metronidazole-sensitive and 70.8% in metronidazole-resistant strains. Modified intent-to-treat analysis resulted in a 80% eradication rate--82.5% in metronidazole-sensitive and 66.7% in metronidazole-resistant strains. Only one patient discontinued treatment because of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The OBMT regimen used in this study is safe and effective against metronidazole-sensitive H pylori strains.     

Second-line rescue therapy with levofloxacin after H. pylori treatment failure: a Spanish multicenter study of 300 patients

AIM: Quadruple therapy is generally recommended as second-line therapy after Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication failure. However, this regimen requires the administration of four drugs with a complex scheme, is associated with a relatively high incidence of adverse effects, and bismuth salts are not available worldwide anymore. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a triple second-line levofloxacin-based regimen in patients with H. pylori eradication failure. METHODS: Design: Prospective multicenter study. Patients: in whom a first treatment with proton pump inhibitor-clarithromycin-amoxicillin had failed. Intervention: A second eradication regimen with levofloxacin (500 mg b.i.d.), amoxicillin (1 g b.i.d.), and omeprazole (20 mg b.i.d.) was prescribed for 10 days. Outcome: Eradication was confirmed with (13)C-urea breath test 4-8 wk after therapy. Compliance with therapy was determined from the interview and the recovery of empty envelopes of medications. Incidence of adverse effects was evaluated by means of a specific questionnaire. RESULTS: Three hundred consecutive patients were included. Mean age was 48 yr, 47% were male, 38% had peptic ulcer, and 62% functional dyspepsia. Almost all (97%) patients took all the medications correctly. Per-protocol and intention-to-treat eradication rates were 81% (95% CI 77-86%) and 77% (73-82%). Adverse effects were reported in 22% of the patients, mainly including nausea (8%), metallic taste (5%), abdominal pain (3%), and myalgias (3%); none of them were severe. CONCLUSION: Ten-day levofloxacin-based rescue therapy constitutes an encouraging second-line strategy, representing an alternative to quadruple therapy in patients with previous proton pump inhibitor-clarithromycin-amoxicillin failure, being simple and safe.     

Eradication of H pylori infection in a rural population： One-day quadruple therapy versus 7-day triple therapy

AIM: To compare the one-day quadruple therapy with a standard 7-d triple therapy for H pylori eradication in a rural population of China. METHODS: A total of 396 patients with 13C-urea breath test positive for H pylori were assigned into two groups: 239 patients received one-day quadruple therapy (amox icillin 2000 mg qid; metronidazole 500 mg qid; bismuth citrate 900 mg qid and lansoprazole 60 mg once daily) and 157 patients received 7-d standard triple therapy (amoxicillin 1000 mg bid; clarithromycin 500 mg bid and lansoprazole 30 mg bid). All the patients underwent a 13C-UBT to assess the eradication of H pylori infection six weeks after treatment. RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty-nine patients completed the one-day therapy (95.8%) and 148 patients completed the 7-d therapy (94.2%). The one day therapy eradicated H pylori infection in 64 patients (27.95%). In contrast, 103 patients (69.59%) were H pylori negative after the 7-d therapy (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: This pilot study suggests there is no beneficial effect of the one-day therapy in treatment of H pylori infection compared with the 7-d standard therapy.