Selective antagonism of dopamine D1 and D2 receptors does not block the development of behavioral sensitization to cocaine

The objective of this study was to determine whether the development of behavioral sensitization to cocaine could be prevented by either D₁ or D₂ selective dopamine receptor antagonists. Male Wistar rats were treated daily for 7 days with either cocaine (15 mg/kg, IP) or vehicle in combination with the D₁ dopamine antagonist SCH 23390 (0.3 mg/kg, SC), the D₂ dopamine antagonist sulpiride (100 mg/kg, IP), or vehicle. After the daily injections, the rats were tested for locomotor activity in photocell arenas. Twenty-four hours after the last pre-exposure test session, all rats were given a challenge injection of cocaine (15 mg/kg, IP) and tested for activity. Cocaine treatments produced a greater relative increase in locomotor activity with repeated exposure (i.e. sensitization). Moreover, this increase in cocaine-induced locomotor activity was attenuated by both SCH 23390 and sulpiride. In contrast, neither sulpiride nor SCH 23390 blocked the development of behavioral sensitization to cocaine. That is, rats pretreated with sulpiride or SCH 23390 and cocaine did not differ from rats pre-exposed only to cocaine when given a cocaine challenge injection. These results suggest that behavioral sensitization to cocaine may develop through either D₁ or D₂ dopamine receptor stimulation or possibly through stimulation of some non-dopaminergic receptor.Portions of this paper were presented at the 1992 Society for Neuroscience meetings, Anaheim, Cal., USA     

Effects of selective dopamine D1- and D2-type receptor antagonists on the development of behavioral sensitization to 7-OH-DPAT

The primary objective of this study was to determine whether the development of behavioral sensitization to the putative dopamine D₃ receptor agonist 7-OH-DPAT could be prevented by either selective D₁-type or D₂-type dopamine receptor antagonists. In three experiments, male Wistar rats (250–350 g) were given seven to nine injections (at 48-h intervals) of 7-OH-DPAT (1.0 mg/kg, SC) or vehicle in combination with the D₂-type dopamine antagonist eticlopride (0.3 mg/kg, SC), the D₁-type dopamine antagonist SCH 23390 (0.1 or 0.2 mg/kg, SC), or vehicle. After the injections, the rats were tested for locomotor activity in photocell arenas for 2 h. In the first two experiments, after seven injections, all rats were tested for activity following vehicle injections to test for possible conditioning effects. In each experiment, after the last pre-exposure session, all rats were given a challenge injection of 7-OH-DPAT (1.0 mg/kg, SC) and tested for activity. Major findings were as follows: a) 7-OH-DPAT treatments produced a progressively greater increase in locomotor activity with repeated treatment; b) concurrent treatment with eticlopride or SCH 23390 (0.1 and 0.2 mg/kg) blocked the acute locomotor-activating effects of 7-OH-DPAT across days; c) eticlopride, but not SCH 23390, completely blocked the development of behavioral sensitization to 7-OH-DPAT. Although the low dose of SCH 23390 (0.1 mg/kg) produced a partial attenuation of sensitization, the higher dose (0.2 mg/kg) of SCH 23390 appeared to augment, rather than block, sensitization to 7-OH-DPAT; d) rats previously treated with SCH 23390 (0.2 mg/kg, but not 0.1 mg/kg) without 7-OH-DPAT displayed a hyperactive response to the 7-OH-DPAT challenge injection; and e) after vehicle injections, rats previously given 7-OH-DPAT, SCH 23390, or eticlopride either alone or in combination were more active than vehicle control rats. These findings suggest that the neurochemical mechanisms mediating the development of behavioral sensitization to 7-OH-DPAT may differ from those of other dopamine D₂-type agonists such as quinpirole or bromocriptine. Moreover, these results demonstrate that hyperactivity responses following vehicle injections in drug-pretreated animals do not necessarily reflect conditioning mechanisms. Received: 28 May 1997/Final version: 2 April 1998     

Effects of daily SKF 38393, quinpirole,and SCH 23390 treatments on locomotor activity and subsequent sensitivity to apomorphine

In three experiments, male Wistar rats (250–350 g) were injected (SC) daily with the D₁-type dopamine receptor agonist, SKF 38393 (0.0, 4.0, 8.0, or 16.0 mg/kg), the D₂-type dopamine receptor agonist, quinpirole (0.0, 0.3, or 3.0 mg/kg), and/or the D₁-type dopamine receptor antagonist, SCH 23390 (0.0 or 0.5 mg/kg) for 8–10 days. After each daily injection, the rats were tested for locomotor activity in photocell arenas for 20 min. Following this subchronic pretreatment, all rats were challenged with the mixed dopamine receptor agonist apomorphine (1.0 mg/kg, SC) and tested for locomotor activity. SKF 38393 treatments produced a dose-dependent decrease in locomotor activity which did not significantly change across days. Quinpirole also depressed locomotor activity when first injected, but this quinpirole-induced inhibition of activity progressively decreased across days. When subsequently challenged with apomorphine, rats in both the SKF 38393 and the quinpirole pretreatment groups displayed greater locomotor activity than rats pretreated with only vehicle. Although SCH 23390 pretreatments did not affect subsequent sensitivity to apomorphine, SCH 23390 completely blocked the effect of quinpirole. These results suggest that although repeated D₁ receptor stimulation may be sufficient to induce behavioral sensitization to apomorphine, D₂ receptor stimulation also contributes to the effect.Portions of this paper were presented at the 1991 Society for Neuroscience meetings, New Orleans, La, USA.     

Partial agonistic action of clozapine at dopamine D2 receptors in dopamine depleted animals

 In the present experiments, the locomotor and stereotypic stimulant effects of the atypical antipsychotic agent, clozapine were studied in mice depleted of their brain dopamine by reserpine and alpha-methyl-p-tyrosine pretreatment. Clozapine at a dose of 1mg/kg produced slight stimulation of locomotor activity, but failed to produce any stereotypy. However, clozapine at 0.5 or 2 mg/kg failed to show increase in locomotor activity or stereotypy. Clozapine potentiated the locomotor activity and stereotypy induced by selective dopamine D₁ receptor agonist, SKF 38393 but blocked locomotor activity and stereotypy induced by dopamine D₂ agonist, B-HT 920 (1 mg/kg) and stereotypy induced by higher dose of B-HT 920 (2 mg/kg). The synergistic action of clozapine and SKF 38393 was partially blocked by the dopamine D₁ selective antagonist SCH 23390 and the dopamine D₂ selective antagonist, sulpiride, respectively. Clozapine potentiated the stereotypy induced by apomorphine (0.5 and 1 mg/kg) but did not affect locomotor stimulating activity of apomorphine. These behavioral effects of clozapine suggested that it has partial agonistic action at dopamine D₂ receptors. Received: 22 July 1997/Final version: 17 August 1997     

Apomorphine-induced behavioural sensitization in rats: individual differences, role of dopamine and NMDA receptors

Apomorphine-induced behavioural sensitization was studied in male Wistar rats. The acute administration of apomorphine (0.5 mg/kg s.c.), a dopamine agonist, did not affect the locomotor activity of rats, but it caused stereotyped behaviour characterized by repeated gnawing, licking and sniffing. A significant increase in the locomotor activity became evident after repeated treatments with apomorphine (0.5 mg/kg twice daily for 14 days). However, there were marked individual differences in the sensitization of rats to apomorphine. One third of animals did not react with increased locomotor activity even after the 2-week administration of apomorphine, whereas the other one third needed only a few injections to display increased behavioural response to apomorphine. The behavioural response of the remaining one third of rats was between weak and strong responders. Simultaneously, the stereotyped behaviour occurred earlier and its intensity tended to be lower after repeated treatment with apomorphine. Nevertheless, the established changes of stereotyped behaviour did not correlate with the increase of locomotor activity. The administration of amphetamine (2.5 mg/kg, s.c.), an indirect dopamine agonist, but not a non-competitive NMDA antagonist dizocilpine (0.25 mg/kg i.p.), tended to cause a similar response profile with apomorphine in sensitized rats. The ED₅₀ values of the dopamine antagonists blocking apomorphine-induced increase in the locomotor activity were the following: 0.09 mg/kg for raclopride (dopamine D₂ antagonist), 0.023 mg/kg for SCH 23390 (dopamine D₁ antagonist), 6.42 mg/kg for clozapine (dopamine D₄ antagonist). This supports the involvement of D₁ and D₂ receptors in the expression of apomorphine-induced behavioural sensitization. The concomitant administration of dizocilpine (0.5 mg/kg), SCH 23390 (0.05 mg/kg), raclopride (0.1 mg/kg) and clozapine (20 mg/kg) with apomorphine (0.5 mg/kg twice daily for 2 weeks) antagonized the development of behavioural sensitization to apomorphine. Accordingly, at least three different molecular targets, namely dopamine D₁ and D₂, and NMDA receptors, are involved in the development of apomorphine-induced behavioural sensitization.     

Effects of dopamine D1 and D2 receptor blockade on MK-801-induced hyperlocomotion in rats

Blocking glutamatergic transmission at the N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor complex with MK-801 (0.15–0.5 mg/kg, IP) was found to induce a robust, dose-dependent increase in locomotor activity. This behavioural activation was similar in intensity to that observed afterd-amphetamine (1 mg/kg, SC). The locomotor stimulation induced by MK-801 at 0.3 mg/kg was significantly inhibited by the D₂ dopamine receptor antagonist raclopride (0.1–0.3 mg/kg, SC) and by the D₁ receptor antagonist SCH 23390 (0.04 mg/kg, SC). The locomotor activity induced by a higher dose of MK-801 (0.5 mg/kg) was reduced by higher doses of raclopride or SCH 23390 administered alone (0.3 and 0.08 mg/kg, respectively), and was inhibited by simultaneous administration of ineffective doses. Raclopride significantly reducedd-amphetamine-induced locomotor activity at a dose (0.2 mg/kg) that also blocked the effects of a low dose of MK-801. In contrast, SCH 23390 blocked the effects ofd-amphetamine at a dose (i.e. 0.01 mg/kg) lower than that needed to block MK-801. These results suggest that the dopaminergic system may in part mediate the locomotor effects induced by the NMDA antagonist, MK-801, in rats. However, the locomotor activity induced by MK-801 appears to be less sensitive to dopaminergic receptor blockade than that induced byd-amphetamine, suggesting that the underlying mechanisms, although similar, are not identical.     

D1 dopamine receptor blockade prevents the facilitation of amphetamine self-administration induced by prior exposure to the drug

 Prior exposure to amphetamine leads to sensitized locomotor responding to subsequent injections and an enhanced predisposition to self-administer low doses of the drug. Because D₁ dopamine (DA) receptors have been shown to play an important role in the development of sensitized locomotor responding to amphetamine, the present experiment assessed their contribution to the development of facilitated amphetamine self-administration produced by prior exposure to the drug. During a pre-exposure phase, rats were administered two injections on each of 10 consecutive days. The first injection (saline, 1 ml/kg, IP, or the D₁ DA receptor antagonist SCH23390, 0.04 mg/kg, SC) preceded the second (saline or amphetamine, 1.5 mg/kg, IP) by 30 min. Starting 10 days after the last injection, animals were given the opportunity to lever press for a low dose of amphetamine (10 μg/kg per infusion) in a two-lever (active versus inactive) continuous reinforcement operant task, in each of seven daily sessions. Consistent with previous reports, prior exposure to amphetamine resulted in an increase in active versus inactive lever pressing. Blocking D₁ DA receptors with SCH23390 prior to each of the amphetamine pre-exposure injections prevented the development of this enhanced self-administration of amphetamine. When animals were grouped according to their locomotor response to a novel environment (assessed prior to the experiment), it was found, again in agreement with previous reports, that enhanced drug self-administration (as indicated by increased active versus inactive lever pressing as well as shorter latencies to emit the first active lever press, shorter inter-response times and more time-out responses on this lever) was observed only in amphetamine pre-exposed rats that had shown a locomotor response to novelty above the median of the subject sample (high responders). Preceding the amphetamine pre-exposure injections with SCH23390 blocked the development of enhanced drug self-administration observed in these animals. These findings, indicating that manipulations known to block the induction of locomotor and dopaminergic sensitization by amphetamine also block the facilitation of drug self-administration, suggest an important and common role for D₁ DA receptor activation in the development of enhanced responding to and for drug. Received: 19 June 1997 / Final version: 15 January 1998     

Effects of dopamine D1- or D2-like receptor antagonists on the hypermotive and discriminative stimulus effects of (+)-MDMA

Rationale Both dopamine (DA) and serotonin (5-HT) release are evoked by (+)-MDMA; however, little is known of the contribution of DA D₁- and D₂-like receptors (D₁R and D₂R, respectively) in the behavioral effects of (+)-MDMA.Objectives To test the hypothesis that a D₁R or D₂R antagonist would attenuate the hypermotive or discriminative stimulus effects of (+)-MDMA.Methods Male Sprague-Dawley rats (n=164) were pretreated with the D₁R antagonist SCH 23390 (3.125–50 g/kg, SC) or the D₂R antagonist eticlopride (12.5–50 g/kg, SC) prior to treatment with (+)-MDMA (3 mg/kg, SC) and locomotor activity was recorded using photobeam monitors. Twelve additional rats trained to discriminate (+)-MDMA (1 mg/kg, IP) from saline in a two-lever water-reinforced FR20 task were administered SCH 23390 (6.25 g/kg, IP) or eticlopride (12.5 g/kg, IP) prior to (+)-MDMA (0.375–1.0 mg/kg, IP). Rats were then placed in the drug discrimination chambers and the percent (+)-MDMA appropriate responding and response rate were measured.Results Both SCH 23390 and eticlopride blocked (+)-MDMA-evoked hyperactivity in a dose-related manner; the highest doses of the antagonists also effectively suppressed basal locomotor activity. In rats trained to discriminate (+)-MDMA from saline, SCH 23390 (6.25 g/kg), but not eticlopride (12.5 g/kg), blocked the stimulus effects of (+)-MDMA without altering response rate.Conclusion These data indicate that DA released indirectly by (+)-MDMA administration results in stimulation of D₁R and D₂R to enhance locomotor activity. Furthermore, the D₁R appears to play a more prominent role than the D₂R in the discriminative stimulus properties of (+)-MDMA.     

Effects of chronic lithium pretreatment on apomorphine-induced penile erection

• 1.1. The effects of chronic lithium pretreatment (600 mg/l in drinking rats, 30 days) on penile erection (PE) induced by apomorphine were investigated in rats. This treatment resulted in a serum Li concentration after 30 days of 0.31 ± 0.01 mmol/l.
• 2.2. Subcutaneous (s.c.) administration of mixed Dl/D2 dopamine receptor agonist apomorphine (0.05–0.5 mg/kg) induced PE in a biphasic manner. The maximum effect was obtained with 0.1 mg/kg of the drug while the response decreased with increasing doses of apomorphine from 0.1 to 0.5 mg/kg.
• 3.3. Pretreatment of animals with 0.0125-0.1 mg/kg of D1 dopamine receptor antagonist SCH 23390 or D2 dopamine receptor antagonist sulpiride (12.5–100 mg/kg) decreased apomorphine-induced PE. Combination of SCH 23390 (0.025 mg/kg) with sulpiride (12.5 mg/kg) caused a stronger inhibitory effect on apomorphine response. This indicates that both D1 and D2 dopamine receptors may be involved in PE induced by apomorphine.
• 4.4. The response induced by apomorphine (0.05-0.5 mg/kg) was decreased in animals pretreated with chronic lithium. The inhibitory effect of sulpiride on apomorphine response, increased in animals pretreated with lithium, in contrast the inhibitory effect of SCH 23390 did not change in this condition. However, a combination of SCH 23390 with sulpiride increased inhibitory effect on apomorphine response in lithium pretreated rats.
• 5.5. It is concluded that chronic lithium inhibits PE induced by dopaminergic mechanism(s).

     

Ontogenetic effects of EEDQ on amphetamine-induced behaviors of rats: role of presynaptic processes

Previous research has shown that the alkylating agentN-ethoxycarbonyl-2-ethoxy-1, 2-dihydroquinoline (EEDQ) affects dopamine (DA) synthesis and metabolism in both preweanling and adult rats. In the present study, we attempted to determine the behavioral relevance of EEDQ's presynaptic actions. To that end, 17- and 90-day-old rats were injected with either EEDQ (7.5 mg/kg, IP) or its vehicle 30 min after half the rats were pretreated with the selective DA antagonists SCH 23390 and sulpiride. (SCH 23390/sulpiride pretreatment was used to protect D₁ and D₂ receptors from EEDQ-induced inactivation.) The behavioral effects of amphetamine (0, 0.1, 0.3, or 1.0 mg/kg, IP) were then assessed 1, 2, 4, and 8 days after EEDQ treatment. Amphetamine-induced behaviors were used to assess EEDQ's presynaptic actions, because amphetamine does not directly bind to the DA receptor, but rather releases DA from the presynaptic terminal. Further, since half of the EEDQ-treated rats had a full complement of DA receptors (i.e., those rats pretreated with SCH 23390/sulpiride), EEDQ's actions in the presynaptic terminal could be dissociated from actions at pre- and postsynaptic receptors. In general, the results showed that EEDQ blocked most of the amphetamine-induced behaviors of both 17- and 90-day-old rats. Surprisingly, pretreatment with SCH 23390 and sulpiride only protected the amphetamine-induced behaviors of adult rats, but not the behaviors of 17-day-old rat pups. When considered together, these results suggest that EEDQ's presynaptic effects are not behaviorally relevant to the adult rat, but may be responsible for eliminating amphetamine-induced behaviors in the 17-day-old rat pup.     

Role of the D1 receptor for the dopamine agonist-induced one-trial behavioral sensitization of preweanling rats

Rationale

The neural mechanisms mediating the ontogeny of behavioral sensitization are poorly understood.

Objective

The purpose of the present study was to determine the role of the D1 receptor for the induction of dopamine agonist-induced behavioral sensitization during the preweanling period.

Methods

In the first experiment, the early ontogeny of R-propylnorapomorphine (NPA)-induced behavioral sensitization was examined by pretreating male and female rats with saline or NPA (0.5, 1, or 2 mg/kg, intraperitoneally (IP)) before placement in activity chambers on postnatal day (PD) 12, 16, 20, or 24. One day later, rats were tested with lower doses of NPA and the occurrence of locomotor sensitization was determined. In subsequent experiments, rats were injected with saline or the D1 receptor antagonist SCH23390 (0.1, 0.5, 1, or 5 mg/kg, IP) 0, 15, 30, or 60 min before cocaine, methamphetamine (METH), or NPA pretreatment. The next day, rats were tested with the same dopamine agonist again and sensitized responding was assessed.

Results

NPA produced one-trial behavioral sensitization at all ages tested. In preweanling rats, SCH23390, regardless of dose, was ineffective at preventing the induction of cocaine-, METH-, or NPA-induced one-trial behavioral sensitization.

Conclusions

The present results are in partial contrast to adult rodent studies, in which SCH23390 blocks the induction of METH- and apomorphine-induced behavioral sensitization, but not cocaine sensitization. When these findings are considered together, it appears that D1 receptor stimulation is not necessary for the induction of behavioral sensitization during the preweanling period, although D1 receptors may play a more important role in adulthood.     

Effects of D1 and D2 antagonists on basal and apomorphine decreased body temperature in mice and rats

In these experiments representative selective antagonists at D1 (SCH 23390) and D2 (haloperidol) receptors were studied for their effects on basal and apomorphine decreased body temperature in mice and rats. In mice, SCH 23390 (up to 3 mg/kg SC) neither affected basal body temperature nor blocked apomorphine-induced hypothermia (AIH). On the other hand, haloperidol alone was hypothermic and paradoxically also blocked AIH in mice. In rats, SCH 23390 alone produced hyperthermia; the mechanism by which this occurred is not known. SCH 23390 also blocked AIH in rats. However, the inhibition of AIH only occurred at doses of SCH 23390 that were themselves hyperthermic. Haloperidol did not alter basal body temperature but did block AIH in rats. These data suggest that apomorphine-induced body temperature changes are D2 mediated.     

Effects of intrastriatal injections of selective dopamine D-1 and D-2 agonists and antagonists on jaw movements of rats

The effects of bilateral intrastriatal injections of the selective D-1 and D-2 antagonists, SCH23390 and sulpiride on apomorphine-induced jaw movements were studied in ketamine-anaesthetized rats after C1 spinal transection. A photo-transducer attached to the lower mandible automatically detected jaw movements. Apomorphine (0.2, 0.5 and 1.0 mg/kg i.v.) dose dependently increased jaw movements, an effect prevented by prior administration into the ventral striatum of either SCH23390 (0.1, 0.5 and 1 microgram) or sulpiride (125 ng). To be effective, SCH23390 had to be given less than 30 min before apomorphine whereas sulpiride had to be given earlier. Sulpiride injected into the dorsal striatum potentiated the effects of apomorphine, an action prevented by administering the sulpiride with SCH23390. Local application of the selective D-1 and D-2 agonists, SKF38393 (5 micrograms) and quinpirole (10 micrograms) into sites within the ventral striatum from which repeated jaw movements could be obtained by electrical stimulation, also evoked jaw movements; the effects of combining the two drugs were much greater than the effects of either drug alone.     

Effects of Dopamine D1 and D2 Receptor Agonists and Antagonists on Seizures Induced by Chemoconvulsants in Mice

Abstract: Dopamine agonists and antagonists with different affinities for D₁ and D₂ receptors in the brain were assessed for their ability to affect clonic seizures in mice induced by chemoconvulsants. The dopamine D₂ antagonists remoxipride (5-20 mg/kg) and raclopride (5-20 mg/kg), haloperidol (2.5 and 5 mg/kg) and the D₁ antagonist SCH 23390 (0.3, 1.5 mg/kg) did not markedly modify seizures induced by pentylenetetrazole, picrotoxin or bicuculline. The dopamine D₂ agonist quinpirole only weakly blocked the action of pentylenetetrazole while the D₁ agonist SKF 38393 (1-10 mg/kg subcutaneously) caused a dose-dependent blockade of pentylenetetrazole-induced seizures. The D₁/D₂ agonist apomorphine given at “postsynaptic” doses (1 and 2 mg/kg) blocked pentylenetetrazole-induced seizures. The protection afforded by apomorphine against pentylenetetrazole seizures appeared to be associated with its activation of both D₁ and D₂ receptors since both raclopride and SCH 23390 blocked the action of apomorphine. Reserpine and the two partial dopamine autoreceptor agonists, (—)3-PPP and HW-165, at high (non-autoreceptor selective) doses induced seizures in animals treated with the subconvulsive dose of pentylenetetrazole. The overall results suggest that dopamine receptor blockade has a minor or limited effect on seizures caused by GABA inhibition. The anticonvulsant effect of dopamine agonists such as apomorphine appears to be mediated by postsynaptic dopamine D₁ and D₂ receptors. Stimulation of dopamine D₁ receptors can reduce seizure activity caused by GABA receptor blockade possibly by facilitation of GABA transmission in the striatum and substantia nigra.     

The Effect of Acute Lithium and Rubidium Pretreatment on Apomorphine-Induced Pecking in Pigeons

Abstract: The effects of different doses of lithium (5-320 mg/kg intramuscularly) and rubidium (0.25-32 mg/kg intramuscularly) on apomorphine-induced pecking were investigated in pigeons. These two cations did not induce pecking by itself. Intramuscular administration of apomorphine (a mixed D1/D2 dopamine receptors agonist, 0.1-1.6 mg/kg) induced pecking in a dose-dependent manner. SCH 23390 (Dl dopamine receptor antagonist, 0.02-0.08 mg/kg) and sulpiride (D2 dopamine receptor antagonist, 25-100 mg/kg) decreased apomorphine-induced pecking dose-dependently. Combination of SCH 23390 (0.04 mg/kg) with sulpiride (50 mg/kg) caused a stronger inhibitory effect on apomorphine response. This indicates that both Dl and D2 dopamine receptors are involved in apomorphine-induced pecking. The response induced by apomorphine (0.2-0.8 mg/kg) was decreased in animals pretreated with lithium and rubidium. In these conditions, SCH 23390 and sulpiride produced a larger inhibitory effect on the apomorphine response, suggesting that acute lithium and rubidium pretreatment inhibit pecking by interfering with dopaminergic mechanisms.     

Apparent enhancement by SCH 23390 of apomorphine-induced locomotor activity in mice.

Effects of the dopamine (DA) D1 antagonist SCH 23390 and the DA D2 antagonist (-)-sulpiride on apomorphine-induced characteristic changes in spontaneous motor activity were investigated in mice using the system we have devised for automatically analyzing animal behaviors in mice. Apomorphine (3 mg/kg, SC) markedly increased parameters of spontaneous motor activity such as locomotor activity and rearing time. Apomorphine-induced increase in locomotor activity had peaks at 5-20 and 30-50 min after administration, and its trough was closely related to the marked increase in rearing time induced by this agonist. Apomorphine-induced locomotor activity accumulated over a 40-min period from 5 to 45 min after apomorphine injection, during which apomorphine-induced increase in rearing time peaked, was significantly increased by intraperitoneal administration of 0.03 and 0.1 but not 0.01 mg/kg SCH 23390. Apomorphine-induced increase in rearing time was dose-dependently depressed by this antagonist. In contrast, (-)-sulpiride (10-40 mg/kg, IP) decreased apomorphine-induced increases in rearing time and locomotor activity rather than enhancing the latter parameter. These data suggest that the apparent enhancement by SCH 23390 of apomorphine-induced locomotor activity is mediated through DA D1 receptors and does not always correlate with depression of apomorphine-induced rearing behavior in mice.     

Repeated administration of dopaminergic agents in the dorsal hippocampus and morphine-induced place preference

The aim of the present experiments was to investigate whether repeated intra-hippocampal CA1 (intra-CA1) administration of dopaminergic agents can affect morphine-induced conditioned place preference (CPP). Effects of repeated intra-CA1 injections of dopamine (DA) receptor agonists and antagonists on morphine-induced CPP in rats were investigated using an unbiased 3-day schedule of place conditioning. Animals receiving once-daily subcutaneous (s.c.) injections of morphine (1-9 mg/kg) or saline (1.0 ml/kg, s.c.) showed a significant place preference in a dose-dependent manner: the maximum response was observed with 3 mg/kg morphine. Three days' intra-CA1 injections of apomorphine (0.25-1 microg/rat) followed by 5 days free of the drug, significantly decreased morphine CPP (1 and 3 mg/kg, s.c.). Moreover, pre-treatment with the highest dose of apomorphine (1 microg/rat) altered the effect of morphine to an aversive response. The morphine (1 and 3 mg/kg) CPP was also significantly decreased in animals that previously received three intra-CA1 injections of SKF 38393 (2-9 microg/rat), quinpirole (1-3 microg/rat) or sulpiride (1-3 microg/rat), and significantly increased in animals that had previously received three intra-CA1 injections of SCH 23390 (0.02 microg/rat). The 3-day pre-treatment with apomorphine, SKF 38393 or quinpirole reduced locomotor activity in the test session, while SCH 23390 and sulpiride did not have any influence on locomotor activity. It is concluded that repeated injections of DA receptor agents in the dorsal hippocampus, followed by 5 days free of the drugs, can affect morphine reward.     

Studies on electroencephalogram (EEG) in rats suggest that moderate doses of cocaine ord-amphetamine activate D1 rather than D2 receptors

The effects of cocaine andd-amphetamine, two psychomotor stimulant drugs with pronounced addictive properties, on the electroencephalogram (EEG) of rats were studied by telemetric recordings from the skull in non-anesthetized, freely moving rats. The electrocorticogram (ECoG) was recorded. Both cocaine (10 mg/kg IP) andd-amphetamine (0.4 mg/kg IP) produced a desynchronization, characterized by a general lowering in power in all of the frequency bands. These effects of both drugs were mimicked by the selective agonist at D₁ receptors SK&F 38393 (3 mg/kg SC) and were reversed by the antagonist at D₁ receptors SCH 23390 (0.2 mg/kg IP) but not influenced by haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg IP) in a dose which is likely to block D₂ rather than D₁ receptors. These doses of cocaine ord-amphetamine did not produce stereotyped behaviour and slight, if any, increases in locomotor activity only. Large doses of cocaine (30 mg/kg IP) ord-amphetamine (4 mg/kg IP) produced stereotyped behaviour and alterations in EEG which are, based on previous own studies, characteristic for additional stimulation of D₂ receptors. This was manifest in a selective increase in power of the alpha-1 band. A similar effect was also produced by the agonist both at D₁ and D₂ receptors, apomorphine (0.5 mg/kg SC). These results suggest that moderate, but probably rewarding doses of cocaine ord-amphetamine mainly activate D₁ dopamine receptors. This activation might be relevant for the rewarding properties of these drugs.     

Striatal and nigral D1 mechanisms involved in the antiparkinsonian effects of SKF 82958 (APB): studies of tremulous jaw movements in rats

  Rationale: Previous work has demonstrated that cholinomimetic-induced tremulous jaw movements in rats have temporal and pharmacological characteristics similar to parkinsonian tremor. Objective: This rodent model was used to characterize the putative antiparkinsonian effects of the full D₁ dopamine receptor agonist, SKF 82958. Methods: Jaw movement activity was induced by the muscarine agonist pilocarpine (4.0 mg/kg IP), and a series of experiments studied the pharmacological characteristics of the reversal of pilocarpine-induced jaw movements by SKF 82958. Results: SKF 82958 (0.5–2.0 mg/kg IP) reduced the tremulous jaw movements induced by pilocarpine. The suppressive effects of SKF 82958 on jaw movements were dose-dependently reversed by systemic pretreatment with the selective D₁ dopamine receptor antagonist SCH 23390 (0.025–0.2 mg/kg IP); SCH 23390 was about 16 times more potent than the D₂ antagonist raclopride at reversing the effects of SKF 82958. Intracranial injection of SCH 23390 (0.5–2.0 μg/side) into the ventrolateral striatum, the rodent homologue of the human ventral putamen, dose-dependently reversed the reduction of pilocarpine-induced jaw movements produced by SKF 82958. Intracranial injection of SCH 23390 (0.5–2.0 μg/side) into the substantia nigra pars reticulata also dose-dependently reversed the reduction by SKF 82958 of pilocarpine-induced jaw movements. Injections of SCH 23390 (2.0 μg/side) into control sites dorsal to the striatum or substantia nigra had no effects on the action of SKF 82958. Intranigral (SNr) injections of the GABA-A antagonist bicuculline blocked the suppressive effect of systemically administered SKF 82958 on jaw movement activity. Conclusions: These data suggest that the antiparkinsonian actions of SKF 82958 may be due to stimulation of D₁ receptors in the ventrolateral striatum and substantia nigra pars reticulata. In addition, these results indicate that GABA mechanisms in the substantia nigra pars reticulata may be important for the antiparkinsonian effects of D₁ agonists. Received: 9 June 1998 / Final version: 10 October 1998     

D1 and D2 dopamine receptor antagonists reverse prepulse inhibition deficits in an animal model of schizophrenia

The amplitude of the acoustic startle response is decreased if the startle stimulus is preceded by a nonstartle eliciting stimulus. This sensorimotor gating phenomenon, known as prepulse inhibition, is diminished in schizophrenic individuals. In rats, the dopamine agonist apomorphine disrupts prepulse inhibition and this disruption is reversed by classical and atypical antipsychotics. Furthermore, the ability of antipsychotics to reverse the apomorphine disruption is correlated with clinical potency and D₂ receptor affinity. In the present study, the role of the D₁ receptor in prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle response was studied; the effects of the D₁ receptor antagonist SCH 23390 were examined and compared to the effects of the D₂ receptor antagonist eticlopride. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were placed into a startle chamber and presented with auditory stimuli consisting of either 95 or 105 dB noise bursts presented alone or preceded by a 75 dB noise burst. Trials consisting of no stimulus and the 75 dB prepulse stimulus alone were also included. These six trial types (ten each) were randomly presented within a 35-min session. Rats treated with 2.0 mg/kg apomorphine (SC) demonstrated a significant disruption of prepulse inhibition compared to vehicle controls. Pretreatment with the D₁ antagonist SCH 23390 (0.01, 0.05, 0.1 mg/kg SC) or the D₂ antagonist eticlopride (0.01, 0.05, 0.1 mg/kg SC) attenuated the disruptive effects of apomorphine. These results indicate that selective blockade of either the D₁ or D₂ receptor subtype is sufficient in reversing the sensorimotor gating deficits produced by apomorphine. The effects of eticlopride and SCH 23390 on prepulse inhibition in saline-treated rats were also examined. Each antagonist produced a dose-related facilitation of prepulse inhibition, suggesting that endogenous DA acting at either receptor subtype plays a role in the tonic modulation of sensorimotor gating.