Clinical implications of fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis in 13 chronic myeloid leukemia cases: Ph-negative and variant Ph-positive.

Thirteen chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients, 10 with variant Philadelphia (Ph) translocations and 3 Ph negative cases, were analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with the use of BCR and ABL cosmid probes and a chromosome 22 painting probe. In the variant Ph translocations, the BCR-ABL fusion gene was located on the Ph chromosome; in 1 CML Ph-negative patient, the BCR-ABL fusion gene was located on the Ph chromosome; and, in 2 patients, it was located on chromosome 9. The chromosome 22 painting probe was detected on the third-party chromosome of the variant translocation, and in none of the variant translocations was there any detectable signal on chromosome 9. In CML patients with clonal evolution of a simple Ph, a signal of the chromosome 22 painting probe was detected on the der(9) of the Ph translocation. It was concluded that the variant Ph translocations evolved simultaneously in a three-way rearrangement. The clinical parameters of the 13 patients were similar to those of a large group of CML patients with a simple Ph translocation. It is suggested that, to determine the prognosis of CML patients with a complex karyotype, FISH analysis with a chromosome 22 painting probe be performed.     

Complex chromosome 9, 20, and 22 rearrangements in acute lymphoblastic leukemia with duplication of BCR and ABL sequences

Cytogenetic analysis was performed on bone marrow cells from a 28-year-old woman who was diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Her karyotype was: 46,XX,t(9;22)(q34;q11)[6]/47, XX,+8,t(9;22)(q34;q11)[4]/47,XX,+8,t(9;22)(q34;q11),del(20)(q11)[2]/46, XX,t(9;22)(q34;q11),del[20](q11)[7]/45,XX,der(9)t(9;22)(q34;q11),-20,-22 , +mar1[8]/45,XX,der(9)t(9;22)(q34;q11),-20,-22,+mar2[3]. Both marker chromosomes are dicentric and have the same size and banding pattern but different primary constrictions. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) demonstrated that both markers were derived from chromosomes 9, 20, and 22. FISH with the bcr/abl probe showed fusion of the BCR gene with the ABL gene; however, this fusion signal was present in duplicate on both marker chromosomes. To our knowledge, duplication of the BCR/ABL fusion signal on a single chromosome arm has not been reported before, except for the extensive amplification of BCR/ABL fusion signals in the leukemic cell line K-562. These data demonstrate that the marker chromosomes are the result of complex genomic rearrangements. At the molecular level, the BCR/ABL fusion gene encodes the p190 fusion protein. Similar findings have never been observed in any case of ALL.     

Integration of amplified BCR/ABL fusion genes into the short arm of chromosome 17 as a novel mechanism of disease progression in chronic myeloid leukemia

We describe the cases of two patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), in whom the extramedullary blastic phase developed during disease progression. The similar clinical presentations of these patients was accompanied by gain of identical secondary chromosome abnormalities, that is, monosomies 9, 14, and 22, and by a clustered amplification of the BCR/ABL fusion gene. The additional copies of the BCR/ABL fusion gene were integrated into the short arm of structurally abnormal chromosomes 17 in both patients. The conformity of these genetic features in two patients with a rare disease manifestation leads us to the assumption that either the clustered amplification of the BCR/ABL fusion gene or the integration of this cluster into the short arm of chromosome 17 or both are associated with extramedullar disease progression in CML. Furthermore, the insertion of amplified BCR/ABL fusion genes into structurally abnormal chromosomes provides a novel mechanism of disease progression in BCR/ABL-positive CML.     

Molecular cytogenetic characterization of a complex rearrangement involving chromosomes 9 and 22 in a case of Ph-negative chronic myeloid leukemia

The "golden path", produced by the Human Genome Project effort, is composed of a collection of overlapping and fully sequenced BAC/PAC clones covering almost completely the human genome. These clones can be advantageously exploited as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) probes for the characterization of rearrangements frequently found in tumors. Breakpoint characterization can be further refined by generating additional smaller FISH probes through LONG-PCR amplification of specific DNA segments, 5-10 kb in size, using appropriate BAC/PAC probes as template. We report here an example of this approach that has been used to characterize a complex Ph-negative chronic myeloid leukemia (CML Ph-) case in which the BCR/ABL fusion gene was found located on chromosome 9.     

荧光原位杂交技术在诊断变异Ph易位及Ph(一)慢性髓细胞白血病中的应用

目的 探讨荧光原位杂交(fluorescence in situ hybridization,FISH)技术在诊断变异Ph易位及Ph(-)慢性髓细胞白血病(chronic myelocytic leukemia,CML)中的应用价值.方法 应用常规R显带方法,对9例伴有变异Ph易位和2例Ph(-)CML患者采用双色双融合bcr/abl探针进行FISH检测.结果 9例变异Ph易位CML患者异常核型除涉及9和22号染色体外,还涉及1、3、5、12、13、15、17、21号染色体,且部分类型为重现性异常,FISH结果均为阳性,信号特征为2R2G1Y;2例Ph(-)CML患者核型正常,FISH结果阳性,信号特征分别为1R1G2Y和1R1G1Y.结论 FISH技术对伴有变异Ph易位及Ph(-)CML患者的诊断更具有优势,可根据阳性细胞信号特征分析其异常核型,判断标记基因异常改变情况,是常规染色体显带分析的有益补充.     

A FISH study of variant Philadelphia rearrangements

A total of 39 variant Philadelphia (Ph) translocations were studied by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using MBCR/ABL, mBCR/ABL, or DBCR/ABL probes. Seven cases did not have a BCR/ABL fusion signal. Of a total of 32 fusion-positive cases, 5 were simple variants involving chromosome 22 and another chromosome apart from chromosome 9; 23 were complex variants involving chromosomes 22, 9, and a third chromosome (18 cases), or 22, 9, and two other chromosomes (4 cases). Masked Ph rearrangements were detected in 4 cases. One case was a Ph chromosome mimic. Fluorescence in situ hybridization has become a widely used method for studying Ph rearrangements. The latest probe that is being used is the DBCR/ABL (double reciprocal BCR/ABL signals). The expected pattern for this probe is one green ABL signal (1G) on the normal 9, one red BCR signal (1R) on the normal 22, and two fusion signals, BCR/ABL and ABL/BCR (2F), on a derivative 22 and a derivative 9, respectively. Deviant patterns from 1G1R2F, and sometimes 1G1R2F, were indicative of a variant, as long as there was a fusion signal. However, in interphase analysis, it is not possible to visualize a variant rearrangement, and when a deviant pattern involving at least one fusion signal is observed, the following possibilities should be contemplated. The different patterns observed in fifteen Ph variants are described. The patterns observed in variants studied with the DBCR/ABL probe were 2G2R1F (40%), 1G1R2F (20%), 1G1R1F (20%), 1G2R1F (13.3%), and 2G1R1F (6.66%). A single mechanism is involved in the formation of each of these patterns. A 2G2R1F, FISH pattern in 6 cases appears to involve a single concerted event of simultaneous breaks on the participating chromosomes followed by mismatched joining. The three cases with 1G1R2F most probably arose by two sequential rearrangements. The 1G1R1F pattern suggests that either the BCR and ABL breakpoints are different, or there are deletions at the breakpoints, because residual signals are not observed. Two independent events appear to be involved in 1G2R1F with a reverse cryptic 9,22 rearrangement as the first event. In one case of 2G1R1F, the plausible explanation is an insertion of ABL next to BCR and either a simultaneous or a sequential translocation with another chromosome.     

Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of complex translocations in two newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myelogenous leukemia patients.

Two different complex translocations from newly diagnosed cases of Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) were characterized by G-banding and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis. In one case, a unique balanced t(9;22;9;11) (q34;q11;p22;q23) was identified by G-banding, and confirmed by FISH using MBCR/ABL and painting probes. In the second case, an apparently balanced t(19;22) was identified by G-banding analysis. FISH using MBCR/ABL probe detected the fusion gene on the derivative chromosome 22, indicating the involvement of chromosome 9. Further FISH analysis with selected painting probes showed that the t(19;22) was a result of a complex translocation involving chromosomes 9, 19, 21, and 22.     

BCR/ABL fusion gene detected on 9q34 by fluorescence in situ hybridization in an acute leukemia with two BCR/ABL positive clones, one Ph-negative and one Ph-positive.

We report cytogenetic, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and molecular analyses in the first reported case of an acute leukemia with two BCR-positive clones: one cell Ph-positive and all others Ph-negative. A BCR/ABL fusion gene on 9q34 was detected only with a BCR/ABL dual color translocation probe. These FISH interphase signals must be confirmed on a metaphase to avoid an erroneous interpretation. This observation appears to indicate a 2-step mechanism for this aberrant fusion gene localization: first, a classical t(9;22), and then the transfer of the fusion gene formed on chromosome 22 to chromosome 9 by a second translocation between the long arms of the derivative chromosomes 9q+ and 22q-, masking the first chromosome exchange.     

Studies of complex Ph translocations in cases with chronic myelogenous leukemia and one with acute lymphoblastic leukemia

The BCR/ABL gene fusion, the hallmark of chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) is generated in 2-10% of patients by a variant Ph translocation involving 9q34, 22q11.2, and one or more additional genomic regions. The objective of this study was the characterization by conventional and molecular cytogenetics of complex variant Ph translocations present at diagnosis. FISH studies were performed in 7 cases using the LSI BCR/ABL ES probe allowing the detection of the fusion BCR/ABL gene on the Ph chromosome in all of them and 9q34 deletions in 2 cases. Three cryptic complex rearrangements were detected by FISH studies. The third and the fourth chromosome regions involved in the 8 complex variant translocations were: 1q21, 1p36, 5q31, 11q13, 12q13, 12p13, and 20q12. In conclusion, FISH studies have been useful in the detection of the BCR/ABL rearrangements and 9q34 deletions, and to identify complex rearrangements that differ from the ones previously established by conventional cytogenetics.     

Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization studies for the detection of 9q34 deletions in chronic myelogenous leukemia: a practical approach to clinical diagnosis

Chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) is characterized by the Philadelphia chromosome (Ph) in more than 90% of cases. Recent studies using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) have shown that in a subset of patients with CML, deletions of 9q34 involving the argininosuccinate synthetase region occur at the time of the Philadelphia translocation and are associated with a poor prognosis. We performed interphase FISH studies in 152 cases of CML using a dual-color, dual-fusion probe system with a third probe directed at 9q34. Cytogenetic studies showed a simple (typical) Ph in 124/152 (82%), a cryptic Ph in 11/152 (7%), and a variant Ph chromosome with a complex translocation in 17/152 (11%) of cases. Interphase FISH studies showed single BCR/ABL fusion patterns in 48/152 (32%) of cases. Deletions of 9q34 were observed in 14% of all the cases and were present in 46% of cases with single BCR/ABL fusion pattern. All the 9q34 deletions occurred in cases with single BCR/ABL fusion signal. However, a single-fusion pattern is not specific for 9q34 deletions, and cases should be routinely screened for the presence of this prognostically significant abnormality by using a third probe directed specifically at 9q34.     

两种BCR/ABL探针在Ph阳性白血病荧光原位杂交检测中的不同信号模式及其意义

目的 比较BCR/ABL双色额外信号探针(dual color extra-signal BCR/ABL probe,ESFISH探针)及BCR/ABL双色双融合探针(dual color dual fusion BCR/ABL probe,D-FISH探针)在Ph阳性白血病荧光原位杂交(fluorescence in situ hybridization,FISH)检测中信号模式的差异,探讨它们的诊断价值.方法 分别采用D-FISH和ES-FISH探针对74例伴有单纯t(9;22)(q34;q11)及37例伴有变异Ph易位或复杂核型异常的Ph阳性白血病患者骨髓细胞进行间期FISH检测.结果 所有单纯t(9;22)(q34;q11)易位的白血病患者应用两种探针均检测到BCR/ABL阳性信号,ES-FISH探针显示2个橙色信号、1个绿色信号和1个黄色信号模式,而D-FISH探针显示1个橙色信号、1个绿色信号和2个黄色信号模式.ES-FISH探针在9例(12.2%)Ph阳性白血病患者中识别次要BCR断裂位点(1个橙色信号、1个绿色信号和2个黄色信号),而D-FISH探针不能识别主要BCR和次要BCR断裂位点;D-FISH探针在8例(10.8%)Ph阳性白血病中区分ABL基因单独缺失(1个橙色信号、2个绿色信号、1个黄色信号)和ABL、BCR基因共同缺失(1个橙色信号、1个绿色信号和1个黄色信号),ES-FISH则不能区分之.检测变异Ph易位和含Ph易位的复杂核型异常时,两种探针的信号模式分别有4种和6种之多,且以不典型者居多,对于它们的精确解释必须依赖常规染色体分析和中期FISH结果 .结论 ES-FISH及D-FISH探针由于BCR探针大小及覆盖区域不同,在Ph阳性白血病的FISH检测中显示不同信号模式,可分别作为Ph+急性淋巴细胞白血病和慢性髓系白血病患者FISH检测的首选.若采用伊马替尼治疗,主要BCR断裂点和次要BCR断裂点、伴或不伴有衍生9号染色体部分序列缺失均不影响预后,但鉴于ES-FISH探针性价比优于D-FISH探针,推荐其作为Ph阳性白血病FISH检测的首选.     

两种BCR/ABL探针在Ph阳性白血病荧光原位杂交检测中的不同信号模式及其意义

目的 比较BCR/ABL双色额外信号探针(dual color extra-signal BCR/ABL probe,ESFISH探针)及BCR/ABL双色双融合探针(dual color dual fusion BCR/ABL probe,D-FISH探针)在Ph阳性白血病荧光原位杂交(fluorescence in situ hybridization,FISH)检测中信号模式的差异,探讨它们的诊断价值.方法 分别采用D-FISH和ES-FISH探针对74例伴有单纯t(9;22)(q34;q11)及37例伴有变异Ph易位或复杂核型异常的Ph阳性白血病患者骨髓细胞进行间期FISH检测.结果 所有单纯t(9;22)(q34;q11)易位的白血病患者应用两种探针均检测到BCR/ABL阳性信号,ES-FISH探针显示2个橙色信号、1个绿色信号和1个黄色信号模式,而D-FISH探针显示1个橙色信号、1个绿色信号和2个黄色信号模式.ES-FISH探针在9例(12.2%)Ph阳性白血病患者中识别次要BCR断裂位点(1个橙色信号、1个绿色信号和2个黄色信号),而D-FISH探针不能识别主要BCR和次要BCR断裂位点;D-FISH探针在8例(10.8%)Ph阳性白血病中区分ABL基因单独缺失(1个橙色信号、2个绿色信号、1个黄色信号)和ABL、BCR基因共同缺失(1个橙色信号、1个绿色信号和1个黄色信号),ES-FISH则不能区分之.检测变异Ph易位和含Ph易位的复杂核型异常时,两种探针的信号模式分别有4种和6种之多,且以不典型者居多,对于它们的精确解释必须依赖常规染色体分析和中期FISH结果 .结论 ES-FISH及D-FISH探针由于BCR探针大小及覆盖区域不同,在Ph阳性白血病的FISH检测中显示不同信号模式,可分别作为Ph+急性淋巴细胞白血病和慢性髓系白血病患者FISH检测的首选.若采用伊马替尼治疗,主要BCR断裂点和次要BCR断裂点、伴或不伴有衍生9号染色体部分序列缺失均不影响预后,但鉴于ES-FISH探针性价比优于D-FISH探针,推荐其作为Ph阳性白血病FISH检测的首选.     

两种BCR/ABL探针在Ph阳性白血病荧光原位杂交检测中的不同信号模式及其意义

目的 比较BCR/ABL双色额外信号探针(dual color extra-signal BCR/ABL probe,ESFISH探针)及BCR/ABL双色双融合探针(dual color dual fusion BCR/ABL probe,D-FISH探针)在Ph阳性白血病荧光原位杂交(fluorescence in situ hybridization,FISH)检测中信号模式的差异,探讨它们的诊断价值.方法 分别采用D-FISH和ES-FISH探针对74例伴有单纯t(9;22)(q34;q11)及37例伴有变异Ph易位或复杂核型异常的Ph阳性白血病患者骨髓细胞进行间期FISH检测.结果 所有单纯t(9;22)(q34;q11)易位的白血病患者应用两种探针均检测到BCR/ABL阳性信号,ES-FISH探针显示2个橙色信号、1个绿色信号和1个黄色信号模式,而D-FISH探针显示1个橙色信号、1个绿色信号和2个黄色信号模式.ES-FISH探针在9例(12.2%)Ph阳性白血病患者中识别次要BCR断裂位点(1个橙色信号、1个绿色信号和2个黄色信号),而D-FISH探针不能识别主要BCR和次要BCR断裂位点;D-FISH探针在8例(10.8%)Ph阳性白血病中区分ABL基因单独缺失(1个橙色信号、2个绿色信号、1个黄色信号)和ABL、BCR基因共同缺失(1个橙色信号、1个绿色信号和1个黄色信号),ES-FISH则不能区分之.检测变异Ph易位和含Ph易位的复杂核型异常时,两种探针的信号模式分别有4种和6种之多,且以不典型者居多,对于它们的精确解释必须依赖常规染色体分析和中期FISH结果 .结论 ES-FISH及D-FISH探针由于BCR探针大小及覆盖区域不同,在Ph阳性白血病的FISH检测中显示不同信号模式,可分别作为Ph+急性淋巴细胞白血病和慢性髓系白血病患者FISH检测的首选.若采用伊马替尼治疗,主要BCR断裂点和次要BCR断裂点、伴或不伴有衍生9号染色体部分序列缺失均不影响预后,但鉴于ES-FISH探针性价比优于D-FISH探针,推荐其作为Ph阳性白血病FISH检测的首选.     

BCR/ABL fusion located on chromosome 9 in chronic myeloid leukemia with a masked Ph chromosome

A reciprocal translocation, t(10; 22) (q22; q11), resulting in a masked Ph chromosome was identified in a patient diagnosed with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Both homologs of chromosome 9 were of the normal pattern. Two signals for the ABL probe, both of them hybridized to chromosome 9, were demonstrated via fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Furthermore, cohybridization with two differently labeled BCR/ABL translocation DNA probes indicated a BCR/ABL fusion apparently located on 9q34. Molecular studies revealed a rearrangement of the BCR region and expression of a chimeric BCR/ABL mRNA of CML configuration. These findings indicate that the BCR/ABL fusion resulted from an unusual relocation of the BCR gene from its normal position on 22ql I to 9q34 adjacent to the ABL gene.     

Molecular and cytogenetic characterization of a novel rearrangement involving chromosomes 9, 12, and 17 resulting in ETV6 (TEL) and ABL fusion

We performed chromosome analysis on the bone marrow of a patient with BCR/ABL negative chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). By interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), an extra ABL signal was present in interphase nuclei and appeared to be located at 17p in the metaphase cells. Chromosome analysis showed a subtle abnormality at 17p13 and 12p13 but no visible rearrangement at 9q34 (ABL). Additional FISH experiments disclosed a rearrangement between the short arms of chromosomes 12 and 17 at approximately bands 12p13 and 17p13, respectively. In addition, subtelomeric FISH analysis confirmed the presence of terminal 12p at 17p13 and showed terminal 9q34 to be intact on each chromosome 9. Taken together, these results indicated a rearrangement involving chromosomes 9, 12, and 17 that suggested the possibility of juxtaposition of part of the ETV6 (also known as TEL) locus (12p13) with a portion of ABL (9q34) together at 17p13. The ETV6/ABL fusion was confirmed by RT-PCR, which showed that the first 5 exons of ETV6 were fused in frame with ABL at exon 2. Wild-type ETV6 and ABL were also expressed, in accordance with the FISH results that showed no loss of the second ETV6 or ABL allele.     

双色双融合与额外信号探针在BCR/ABL融合基因检测中的比较及其意义

目的 探讨DCCF(dual color dual fusion)探针与ES(extra signal)探针在BCR/ABL融合基因检测中信号表现的特点,并明确其信号特征与染色体核型的相互关系.方法 对初治65例慢性粒细胞白血病(chronic myelocytic leukemia,CML)及50例急性淋巴细胞白血病(acute lymphoblastic leukemia,ALL)患者骨髓标本进行BCR/ABL的DCDF探针的荧光原位杂交(fluorescence in situ hybridization,FISH)检测,FISH阳性标本则使用ES探针再次进行荧光原位杂交进行BCR断裂点的检测,同时对其中47例CML和40例ALL进行了核型分析.结果 FISH结果示65例CML均为BCR/ABL阳性,DCDFFISH中有17例为非典型信号表现,ES-FISH有12例为非典型信号表现;50例ALL中7例BCR/ABL阳性,ES探针显示5例BCR断裂点位于m-bcr,2例位于M-bcr.核型分析CML检出Ph阳性98%(43/44),ALL检出Ph阳性22%(7/32).结论 DCDF-FISH、ES-FISH以及核型分析各有其特性.根据每种方法的特性,对实验结果进行综合分析可对遗传学特征作出更准确判断.     

双色双融合与额外信号探针在BCR/ABL融合基因检测中的比较及其意义

目的 探讨DCCF(dual color dual fusion)探针与ES(extra signal)探针在BCR/ABL融合基因检测中信号表现的特点,并明确其信号特征与染色体核型的相互关系.方法 对初治65例慢性粒细胞白血病(chronic myelocytic leukemia,CML)及50例急性淋巴细胞白血病(acute lymphoblastic leukemia,ALL)患者骨髓标本进行BCR/ABL的DCDF探针的荧光原位杂交(fluorescence in situ hybridization,FISH)检测,FISH阳性标本则使用ES探针再次进行荧光原位杂交进行BCR断裂点的检测,同时对其中47例CML和40例ALL进行了核型分析.结果 FISH结果示65例CML均为BCR/ABL阳性,DCDFFISH中有17例为非典型信号表现,ES-FISH有12例为非典型信号表现;50例ALL中7例BCR/ABL阳性,ES探针显示5例BCR断裂点位于m-bcr,2例位于M-bcr.核型分析CML检出Ph阳性98%(43/44),ALL检出Ph阳性22%(7/32).结论 DCDF-FISH、ES-FISH以及核型分析各有其特性.根据每种方法的特性,对实验结果进行综合分析可对遗传学特征作出更准确判断.

Abstract：

Objective To investigate the signal patterns of dual color dual fusion (DCDF) probe and extra signal (ES) probe in the detection of BCR/ABL fusion gene, and illustrate the relation between the fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) pattern and the karyotype. Methods Sixty-five cases of chronic myelocytic leukemia(CML) and 50 cases of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) were detected by FISH with DCDF probe, the BCR/ABL positive samples were detected by FISH with ES probe. Among these cases, 47 cases of CML and 40 cases of ALL perform conventional cytogenetics simultaneously. Results All 65 cases of CML were all BCR/ABL positive by FISH. 17 cases showed the atypical pattern by DCDFFISH, and 12 cases showed the atypical pattern by ES-FISH. There were 7 cases of BCR/ABL positive in 50 cases of ALL by FISH. By ES-FISH, there were 5 cases in which the break-point of BCR gene was located in m-bcr, 2 cases in which the break-point of BCR gene was located in M-bcr. Conventional cytogenetics demonstrated that 43/44(98 %) cases of CML and 7/32(22 %) cases of ALL were Ph positive.Conclusion The features of DCDF-FISH, ES-FISH and conventional eytogenetic are different from each other. According to the features of these method, it can increase the precision of the adjustment of genetic feature to analyze these results comprehensively.     

双色双融合与额外信号探针在BCR/ABL融合基因检测中的比较及其意义

目的 探讨DCCF(dual color dual fusion)探针与ES(extra signal)探针在BCR/ABL融合基因检测中信号表现的特点,并明确其信号特征与染色体核型的相互关系.方法 对初治65例慢性粒细胞白血病(chronic myelocytic leukemia,CML)及50例急性淋巴细胞白血病(acute lymphoblastic leukemia,ALL)患者骨髓标本进行BCR/ABL的DCDF探针的荧光原位杂交(fluorescence in situ hybridization,FISH)检测,FISH阳性标本则使用ES探针再次进行荧光原位杂交进行BCR断裂点的检测,同时对其中47例CML和40例ALL进行了核型分析.结果 FISH结果示65例CML均为BCR/ABL阳性,DCDFFISH中有17例为非典型信号表现,ES-FISH有12例为非典型信号表现;50例ALL中7例BCR/ABL阳性,ES探针显示5例BCR断裂点位于m-bcr,2例位于M-bcr.核型分析CML检出Ph阳性98%(43/44),ALL检出Ph阳性22%(7/32).结论 DCDF-FISH、ES-FISH以及核型分析各有其特性.根据每种方法的特性,对实验结果进行综合分析可对遗传学特征作出更准确判断.