Prognostic and clinicopathological utility of programmed death-ligand 1 in malignant pleural mesothelioma: A meta-analysis

ObjectiveProgrammed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) has been reported to be connected to prognosis in individuals with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), although there is no consensus based on data from previous studies. Accordingly, this quantitative meta-analysis investigated prognostic and clinicopathological utility of PD-L1 in patients with MPM.MethodsA comprehensive search of the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for articles published up to October 4, 2019 was performed. Studies using immunohistochemical techniques to detect/quantify the expression of PD-L1 in MPM tissue were enrolled in the analysis. The combined hazard ratio (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) was applied to assess the association between PD-L1 expression and overall survival (OS).ResultsA total of 11 studies comprising 1606 patients was included in the present meta-analysis. For OS, pooled data revealed an HR of 1.50 (95% CI 1.32–1.70; p < 0.001), suggesting that patients with PD-L1 overexpression experience inferior OS. Subgroup analysis revealed that elevated PD-L1 remained a significant prognostic indicator for worse OS, irrespective of sample size, cut-off value, ethnicity, and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale score. Moreover, PD-L1 overexpression was associated with non-epithelioid histology (odds ratio 4.30 [95% CI 1.89–9.74]; p < 0.001).ConclusionsResults of this meta-analysis show that elevated expression of PD-L1 could be a factor predicting poorer survival in patients with MPM.     

Effect of pharmacist intervention on antibiotic prophylaxis in orthopedic internal fixation: A retrospective study

BackgroundDespite the availability of guidelines and official policies, antibiotic prophylaxis in clean surgery remains suboptimal.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical effects and cost-effectiveness of pharmacist-led intervention in the perioperative anti-infection prophylaxis of patients undergoing orthopedic internal fixation.MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis based on the medical records of internal fixation surgery in a tertiary hospital from July 2019 to June 2020. Data were divided into two groups based on whether a full-time pharmacist participated in the treatment. The research parameters included use of antibiotics, rationality of medication, postoperative complications, and related cost. To deal with selection bias, propensity score matching method was employed at a ratio of 1:1. Meanwhile, a cost-effectiveness analysis was used to evaluate the impact of pharmacist intervention on antibiotic prevention in internal fixation surgery.ResultsA total of 537 participants were included in this study. After matching, 236 patients were comparable in each group. During the pharmacist intervention period, less pharmacologic prophylaxis (96.6% vs 100.0%, p = 0.007) and shorter prophylaxis duration (1.60 vs 2.28 days, p < 0.001) were observed. The reasonable rate increased dramatically in usage and dosage (96.6% vs 83.9%, p < 0.001), timing of administration (94.5% vs 78.4%, p < 0.001) and medication duration (64.4% vs 37.7%, p < 0.001). In addition, pharmacist intervention yielded net economic benefits. A remarkable reduction was observed in average length of stay (10.43 vs 11.14 days, p = 0.012), drug cost ($610.57 vs $706.60, p = 0.001) and defined daily doses (2.31 vs 3.27, p < 0.001). The cost-effectiveness ratios, divided drug cost savings by cost of pharmacist time, were 28:1 for drug and 2:1 for antibiotics, respectively.ConclusionPharmacist-driven antibiotic stewardship for orthopedic internal fixation patients improved compliance with peri-procedure antibiotic prophylaxis, and reduced the cost and utilization of antibiotics. This helped to bring significant clinical and economic benefits.     

Assessment of knowledge,attitude, and practices of acute kidney injury incidence with co-administration of piperacillin/tazobactam and vancomycin among healthcare workers: A cross-sectional study

BackgroundNo studies have identified a link between acute kidney injury (AKI) incidence due to the co-administration of vancomycin and piperacillin/tazobactam (VPT) and healthcare providers’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices. We aimed to (1) assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards AKI due to VPT co-administration among healthcare providers in Saudi Arabia, and (2) examine the relationship between healthcare providers’ knowledge and attitudes about AKI due to VPT co-administration and their practices.MethodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted between February 2022 and April 2022. Healthcare providers, including physicians, pharmacists, and nurses, were included in the study population. The correlation coefficient assessed the relationship between knowledge, attitude, and practice. Spearman’s rho was used as a test statistic.ResultsOf the invited healthcare providers, 192 responded to the survey. A significant difference in knowledge was found among healthcare providers for two variables: the definition of AKI (p < 0.001) and appropriate management of AKI due to VPT (p = 0.002). Physicians were found to rely less on the most common causative organisms of infection to guide empirical antibiotic therapy (p < 0.001). In addition, physicians were less likely to switch piperacillin/tazobactam to cefepime or meropenem in combination with vancomycin with AKI incidence (p = 0.001). A positive attitude towards the perceived AKI risk with VPT was positively correlated with avoiding using VPT unless no alternatives were available (Rho = 0.336) and taking protective measures when using VPT (Rho = 0.461).ConclusionDeviation has been observed in the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of AKI incidence with the co-administration of piperacillin/tazobactam and vancomycin among healthcare workers. Interventions at the organizational level are recommended to guide best practices.     

Assessment of a medication management program targeting hypertension and diabetes patients: Impact on medication adherence

BackgroundThe National Health Insurance Service in South Korea has conducted a telephone outreach program to improve medication adherence for hypertension and diabetes patients since 2014.ObjectivesTo evaluate the direct outcomes of the program.MethodsPatients were identified among those who visited an outpatient clinic at least twice or used an inpatient service at least once for hypertension or diabetes during 6-month intervals and who were nonadherent based on the proportion of days covered (PDC) calculated. As a preliminary intervention, participants were mailed an information leaflet on their own medication adherence and other tips for effective self-management of chronic diseases. For the intervention, two phone calls and three phone messages were made to patients by 24 participating regional offices. Ultimately, 2,428 hypertension patients and 884 diabetes patients received the intervention. Propensity matching was used based on age, sex, and the Charlson Comorbidity Index to select 12,140 hypertension and 4,420 diabetes patients as controls in the non-participating regions. The outcome was PDC. Multivariate ordinary least squares or logistic regression analysis were used with difference-in-difference specification.ResultsThe adjusted quarterly PDC increased by 1.96%p for hypertension (p = 0.023) and by 7.79%p for diabetes patients (p < 0.001). Approximately 40.6% and 51.7% of hypertension and diabetes patients in the treatment arm (p = 0.0069) became adherent after the intervention, whereas the corresponding proportions were 37.7% and 41.4% (p < 0.001) in the control group. Both treatment groups showed a higher likelihood of good medication adherence (hypertension: odds ratio = 1.157, 95% CI [1.058, 1.265]; diabetes: odds ratio = 1.532, 95% CI [1.323, 1.774]). The control group, who received only a print intervention with a mailed leaflet, also showed a dramatic increase in medication adherence.ConclusionsAn insurer-coordinated telephone-administered program resulted in improvement of medication adherence among patients with hypertension and diabetes.     

Validation of an assessment,medical problem-oriented plan,and care plan tools for demonstrating the clinical pharmacist's activities

BackgroundIdentifying, preventing, and resolving medical problems are some of the most central functions of clinical pharmacy (CP) and pharmaceutical care (PC) practitioners. Usually, the practitioners and researchers find a challenging to link the problem and the appropriate intervention to be included in the care plan. A comprehensive, well-structured, validated, simple use and standardized tool, which fulfill these requirements in daily clinical practice, are currently rare.PurposeTo design and validate a comprehensive medical problem-oriented plan (MPOP) classification system in addition to assessment and care plan tools for use in practicing, researching, and teaching CP and PC.Materials and methodsThe methodology was composed of five steps: literature searching and classification of the problems; developing the assessment of treatments and care plan templates; implementing the tutorial; validation; completion and evaluation of the final version.ResultsThe classification system (MPOP tool) is an open hierarchical structure, where higher levels are broadly defined, consisting of 5 main categories, and lower levels become more specific. In the MPOP tool's final version, a total of 24 major subcategories were distributed to the major five categories as 4 (Indication), 5 (Effectiveness), 7 (Safety), 3 (Patient), and 5 (Miscellaneous). Different minor subcategories (subcategory 2, n = 62) and 95 plans (interventions) were determined. Each of the subcategories and plans includes a notes section that represents a specific detail. There was strong agreement on using the MPOP tool between the two authors (κ = 1.000, p < 0.0005) and between three random clinical pharmacists out of 17 (κ = 0.947, 95% CI, 0.840 to 1.055, p < 0.0005). The validity and reliability statistics demonstrate that the Alsayed_v1 tools are extremely appropriate. The majority of users expressed high satisfaction with all the assessment, MPOP, and care plan tools.ConclusionThe Alsayed_v1 tools introduced in this paper were applied to actual patient cases and were validated. These tools include: assessment of treatments, MPOP, and care plan. Including the interventions in the classification system is important especially in PC research where the type of recommendations should be documented to assess the value and impact of the service and saves the time of practitioners in typing the appropriate interventions. By applying the steps within these Alsayed tools, the clinical pharmacists can actively provide the best practice to achieve the optimal patient outcome.     

Association of serum macrophage-mannose receptor CD206 with mortality in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

BackgroundAcute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (AE-IPF) is attracting considerable attention due to disease acceleration and substantial mortality. Macrophages are known to regulate the fibrotic process in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.ObjectiveWe investigated if two new macrophage-specific serum biomarkers, soluble mannose receptor (MR, sCD206) and soluble CD163 (sCD163), increased in serum obtained from patients with AE-IPF compared to stable IPF (S-IPF).MethodsA total of 36 IPF patients with AE status, 54 IPF patients with stable status, and 27 normal controls were enrolled in this study. The levels of serum sCD206 and sCD163 were compared among the three groups and analysed with the clinical features and mortality of IPF.ResultsThe serum concentrations of both markers were higher in patients with AE-IPF than in those with S-IPF (580.0 ng/ml vs 335 ng/ml for sCD206 and 69.2 ng/ml vs 37.9 ng/ml for sCD163). The level of sCD206 was related to an increased risk of mortality (HR = 1.002, p < 0.001). The best separation between decedents and survivors was obtained by sCD206 (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] 0.712 and 95% confidence interval 0.595–0.830).ConclusionOur data demonstrated that the macrophage-related markers sCD206 and sCD163 were significantly higher in patients with IPF, especially sCD206 in AE-IPF patients. The high level of serum sCD206 was associated with mortality in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.     

Pharmacy student’s perceptions,behaviours and attitudes toward virtual reality simulation

AimsThe definition of virtual reality simulation (VRS) used for study is the recreation of realistic simulation in a fully online situation with an immersive environment for learning an activity. The study aims to evaluate pharmacy students’ perspectives, behavioral and attitude characteristics in the process of VRS course requiring practical skills.Materials and methodsThis cross-sectional study was based on quantitative questionnaires analysis. A five-point Likert Scale (rating from 1 = Strongly Disagree; 2 = Disagree; 3 = Neutral; 4 = Agree; 5 = Strongly Agree) was utilized to measure the extent to which the students agrees on 30 statements comprised in A-E sections related to VRS. The validity and reliability of the questionnaire were studied by the Cronbach’s Alpha calculation.ResultsA total of 119 junior and senior pharmacy students, aged 18–25, participated in this study. There is no significant gender difference (P > 0.05) and grade difference (P > 0.05) in mean perception score, mean attitude score, mean behavior score and comparison score respectively. Most pharmacy students had positive perception that VRS could help them in practical ability (61.4 %), autonomous learning (68.9 %) and theoretical knowledge (61.4 %). Nevertheless, less than half the students agreed that VRS courses were indispensable (44.5 %) and needed to be increased (42.9 %). Moreover, the ‘disagree’ statement (33.6 %) exceeded ‘agree’ statement (27.7 %) about the question of whether preferring VRS courses to lab teaching. Interestingly, a significant positive correlation that was observed between mean perception score and mean attitude score (r = 0.76, p < 0.001), mean comparison (r = 0.68, p < 0.001) and mean behavior (r = 067, p < 0.001), which revealed that students who thought VRS was beneficial were more likely to accept it.ConclusionThe study highlights the need to establish an interactive, immersive and measurable VRS courses. It is suggested that good interaction between the faculty and student, technology improvement and blended programmatic assessment should be involved in challenges for implementing VRS courses.     

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of home treatment with the recombinant human C1-inhibitor in hereditary angioedema resulting from C1-inhibitor deficiency

ObjectiveConestat alpha, a C1-inhibitor produced by recombinant technology (rhC1-INH) is an acute treatment for edematous attacks occurring in hereditary angioedema (HAE) with C1-inhibitor deficiency (C1-INH-HAE). Our study evaluated the efficacy and safety of rhC1-INH administered during HAE attacks, and for short-term prophylaxis (STP).Materials & methodOur prospective study analyzed the course of 544 HAE attacks experienced by the 21 C1-INH-HAE patients treated, as well as the outcome of 97 instances of STP implemented with rhC1-INH. Using a purpose-designed questionnaire, the patients recorded relevant, treatment-related information.ResultsTime to the administration of rhC1-INH was 90.0 min (median) after the onset of HAE attacks. The symptoms started to improve as early as 60 min after the injection of rhC1-INH, and the attack resolved 730.0 min after treatment. The interval between the onset of the HAE attack and the administration of rhC1-INH correlated with time until the onset of improvement (R = 0.2053 p < 0.0001), and with time to the complete resolution of symptoms (R = 0.2805, p < 0.0001). Nine patients received STP with rhC1-INH in 97 instances. STP successfully prevented the HAE attack within 72 h of the event on 93/97 occasions. No local and serious systemic adverse events/effects were observed.ConclusionsTreatment with rhC1-INH is effective and safe both for acute management, and for STP. Following the onset of an HAE attack, early administration of rhC1-INH may reduce time to the improvement and to the complete resolution of symptoms. Repeated administration of rhC1-INH does not impair its efficacy.     

ISO-alpha-acids improve the hematoma resolution and prevent peri-hematoma inflammations by transforming microglia via PPARgamma-CD36 axis in ICH rats

ObjectiveTo elucidate the effects of ISO-α-acids (IAAs), a PPAR-γ agonist, on ICH rats and its potential mechanism.Material and methodsThe Sprague Dawley rats ICH model was induced by stereotactic injecting of 100 μl autologous artery blood. Ninety male rats were randomly allocated to five groups: autologous blood and IAAs (IAA); received autologous blood, IAAs and PPAR-γ inhibitor (IAA + GW9662); autologous blood and normal Saline (Saline); only autologous blood (Mock); and only needle injection (Sham). Neurological functions were assessed by mNSS. Hematoma volume, brain water content, surface proteins and inflammatory factors were detected. The microglia anti-inflammatory abilities were also evaluated.ResultsIAAs were able to significantly decrease ICH rat’s mNSS scores, alleviate brain water content, improve hematoma resolution than Saline, Mock (p < 0.05). More “M2” microglial/macrophage can be induced by IAAs. The expression of CD 36 was statistically higher in IAA than other groups (p < 0.05). Injection of IAAs led to a greatly increasing in CD 11b and CD 206 double-positive anti-inflammatory type microglial/macrophage, moreover, a reduction of inflammatory cytokines expression (p < 0.05). Such protective effects can be relieved by GW9662.ConclusionsThis is the first study to elucidate the relationship between IAAs and ICH. IAAs were able to accelerate hematoma absorption, alleviate brain edema, suppress peri-hematoma inflammations and finally improved the outcome of ICH rats. The phenotype was due to the IAAs induction of “M2” microglial/macrophage via activating of PPAR-γ and increasing CD 36 expression.     

In-vitro and in-vivo anti-breast cancer activity of synergistic effect of berberine and exercise through promoting the apoptosis and immunomodulatory effects

PurposeBreast cancer is the most common reason of cancer death in women. Berberine (BBR), a main alkaloid in Coptis chinensis, exerted anti-cancer activities. Exercise is a new immunotherapy treatment against cancer. However, it is unclear whether exercise has effects on breast cancer and whether exercise has synergistic anti-cancer effect when co-treated with BBR. Thus, it is assumed that exercise might exert an anti-cancer effect through the immune way.MethodThe anti-tumor effect of exercise and BBR in vivo was studied in mice. The MTT method, hoechst staining and cell morphology were performed to determine the synergistic effect of exercise and BBR on breast cancer in vitro. At the same time, Western blotting, intestinal microbial and SCFA detection, Q-PCR and other methods were used to study the anti-cancer molecular mechanism.ResultsThe study found that exercise and BBR co-treatment significantly slowed the progression of breast cancer in 4T1 tumor-bearing mice (p < 0.01). Compared with the TC group, the infiltration of NK cells increased in the combined group of BBR and exercise (p < 0.01), and the expression of immune factors and cytokines was also regulated. At the same time, the synergistic effect significantly increased the level of short chain fatty acids (SCFA). SCFA can promote apoptosis of 4T1 cells and change the inflammatory factors in vitro. The expression of bcl-2 and XIAP was reduced in tumor tissues, and the expression of Fas, Fadd, Bid, Cyto-C, and Caspase-3/8/9 was also increased in vitro experiments (p < 0.05).ConclusionsThese results indicate that the synergistic treatment of exercise and BBR can improve the immune system, regulate intestinal microbial metabolite (SCFA), activate the mitochondrial apoptosis pathway and Fas death receptor apoptosis pathway, and thus play an anticancer role. This may provide a new method for the treatment of breast cancer.     

Combined evaluation of the expression status of CD155 and TIGIT plays an important role in the prognosis of LUAD (lung adenocarcinoma)

The interaction between CD155 and its high-affinity ligand TIGIT is being increasingly investigated in various solid tumors. However, the prognostic significance of CD155 and TIGIT in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) remains unclear. In this study, immunohistochemistry was applied in 334 LUAD cases to evaluate the expression of CD155 and TIGIT. Western blotting was conducted in 5 paired primary LUAD and adjacent normal lung tissues. Our results reveal that CD155 and TIGIT are overexpressed in LUAD tissues and that aberrant overexpression is closely correlated with poor clinical outcomes (P < 0.01). The multivariate model also shows that CD155 expression is an independent risk factor for LUAD (RR, 1.34; P = 0.036). Moreover, patients expressing high CD155 and TIGIT simultaneously presented shorter overall survival (OS) (P < 0.01) and progression-free survival (PFS) (P < 0.01). These findings suggest that CD155 and TIGIT can make up a prognosticating tool to predict clinical outcomes, thereby contributing to personalized medical care in LUAD.     

Cardioprotective effects of sinomenine in myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury in a rat model

BackgroundIschemia reperfusion (I/R) play an imperative role in the expansion of cardiovascular disease. Sinomenine (SM) has been exhibited to possess antioxidant, anticancer, anti-inflammatory, antiviral and anticarcinogenic properties. The aim of the study was scrutinized the cardioprotective effect of SM against I/R injury in rat.MethodsRat were randomly divided into normal control (NC), I/R control and I/R + SM (5, 10 and 20 mg/kg), respectively. Ventricular arrhythmias, body weight and heart weight were estimated. Antioxidant, inflammatory cytokines, inflammatory mediators and plasmin system indicator were accessed.ResultsPre-treated SM group rats exhibited the reduction in the duration and incidence of ventricular fibrillation, ventricular ectopic beat (VEB) and ventricular tachycardia along with suppression of arrhythmia score during the ischemia (30 and 120 min). SM treated rats significantly (P < 0.001) altered the level of antioxidant parameters. SM treatment significantly (P < 0.001) repressed the level of creatine kinase MB (CK-MB), creatine kinase (CK) and troponin I (Tnl). SM treated rats significantly (P < 0.001) repressed the tissue factor (TF), thromboxane B2 (TXB2), plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1) and plasma fibrinogen (Fbg) and inflammatory cytokines and inflammatory mediators.ConclusionOur result clearly indicated that SM plays anti-arrhythmia effect in I/R injury in the rats via alteration of oxidative stress and inflammatory reaction.     

Clinical and economic impact of medication reconciliation by designated ward pharmacists in a hospitalist-managed acute medical unit

BackgroundMinimizing unintended medication errors after admission is a common goal for clinical pharmacists and hospitalists.ObjectiveWe assessed the clinical and economic impact of a medication reconciliation service in a model of designated ward pharmacists working in a hospitalist-managed acute medical unit as part of a multidisciplinary team.MethodsIn this retrospective observational study, we compared pharmacist intervention records before and after the implementation of a medication reconciliation service by designated pharmacists. The frequency and type of intervention were assessed and their clinical impact was estimated according to the length of hospital stay and 30-day readmission rate. A cost analysis was performed using the average hourly salary of a pharmacist, cost of interventions (time spent on interventions), and cost avoidance (avoided costs generated by interventions).ResultsAfter the implementation of the medication reconciliation service, the frequency of pharmacist interventions increased from 3.9% to 22.1% (p < 0.001). Intervention types were also more diverse than those before the implementation. The most common interventions included identifying medication discrepancies between pre-admission and hospitalization (22.7%) and potentially inappropriate medication use in the elderly (13.1%). The median length of hospital stay decreased from 9.6 to 8.9 days (p = 0.024); the 30-day readmission rate declined significantly from 7.8% to 4.8% (p = 0.046). Over two-thirds of interventions accepted by hospitalists were considered clinically significant or greater in severity. The cost difference between avoided cost and cost of interventions was 9838.58 USD in total or 1967.72 USD per month.ConclusionsThe implementation of a designated pharmacist-led medication reconciliation service had a positive clinical and economic impact in our hospitalist unit.     

Application of the health Belief Model to assess community preventive practices against COVID-19 in Saudi Arabia

BackgroundThe novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has affected hundreds of thousands of people across more than 200 countries. As the pandemic continues, the health agencies, worldwide, are recommending strict preventive practices to avert its transmission at community scale. We sought to predict the behavior of the Saudi population for adopting community preventive practices during the COVID-19 pandemic.MethodsAn online questionnaire consisting of 22 items pertaining to the Health Belief Model constructs was used to measure the perceived susceptibility and perceived severity of contracting COVID-19, along with the perceived benefits and perceived barriers to follow the Ministry of Health’s recommendations. The outcome was assessed by their readiness to be compliant with the community protective measures. Data were analyzed using STATA at significance level of 0.05.ResultsA total of 900 individuals received the online survey link, of which 688 (response rate: 76.4%) respondents consented to participate in the study. The mean age of the respondents was 31.39 (SD = 8.94). Positive associations were observed between perceived susceptibility (Beta: 0.24; p value < 0.001), perceived severity (Beta: 0.16; p value < 0.001), perceived benefits (Beta: 0.41; p value < 0.001), cue to action (Beta: 2.61; p value < 0.001) and the participation in community preventive practices during the pandemic of the COVID-19.ConclusionsHealth belief model's constructs of perceived susceptibility, severity, benefits and cue to action can be adopted to help strengthen COVID-19 limiting behaviors and prevention programs which can delivered through community pharmacies in Saudi Arabia as well as around the world.     

Assessing adherence to infusion-based biologic therapies in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

BackgroundThe intravenous biologics infliximab and vedolizumab are effective long-term therapies for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Though highly effective, suboptimal adherence may result in loss of response and adverse sequelae. The extent and outcomes of suboptimal adherence with intravenous biologics, including in IBD, requires further evaluation.ObjectivesTo ascertain adherence to infliximab and vedolizumab infusions, and determine factors associated with poorer adherence within an IBD cohort.MethodsA retrospective single-centre cohort study of IBD patients, assessing adherence to infliximab and vedolizumab over 2 years (July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2019) was conducted. Medical and pharmacy dispensing records were used to determine date of infusion. Adherence was assessed using the continuous, multiple interval measure of medication gaps (CMG). Objectively measured disease remission was achieved if one or more of endoscopic remission, faecal calprotectin <100 μg/mL and/or CRP <5 mg/mL occurred within 3 months of end of follow-up. Bivariate analysis and multiple linear regression elucidated factors associated with poorer adherence.ResultsOf 193 IBD patients, 132 (68.4%) had Crohn's disease. One hundred and thirty six (70.5%) patients received infliximab and 57 (29.5%) received vedolizumab with a median 13 [IQR 11–14] doses administered per patient over 2 years. Adherence according to CMG was similar between infliximab and vedolizumab groups (median 1.5% vs 1.2%, p = 0.31). In multiple linear regression analysis male sex, shorter IBD duration and clinic non-attendances were each associated with poorer adherence (Beta 4.69, 3.90, 3.56 respectively, p < 0.05) and objective disease remission was inversely associated with poorer adherence (Beta ?3.27, p < 0.05).ConclusionThere was a wide range of adherence to biologic infusions in this IBD cohort with poorer adherence associated with patient related factors. Conversely, objectively measured remission was strongly associated with adherence. This emphasises the need for targeted interventions to improve adherence and monitoring, and mitigate treatment delays.     

Comparison between standard Vs. Escalated dose venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in critically ill patients with COVID-19: A two centers,observational study

IntroductionThe risk of mortality in patients with COVID-19 was found to be significantly higher in patients who experienced thromboembolic events. Thus, several guidelines recommend using prophylactic anticoagulants in all COVID-19 hospitalized patients. However, there is uncertainty about the appropriate dosing regimen and safety of anticoagulation in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Thus, this study aims to compare the effectiveness and safety of standard versus escalated dose pharmacological venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in critically ill patients with COVID-19.MethodsA two-center retrospective cohort study including critically ill patients aged ≥ 18-years with confirmed COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) at two tertiary hospitals in Saudi Arabia from March 1st, 2020, until January 31st, 2021. Patients who received either Enoxaparin 40 mg daily or Unfractionated heparin 5000 Units three times daily were grouped under the “standard dose VTE prophylaxis and patients who received higher than the standard dose but not as treatment dose were grouped under ”escalated VTE prophylaxis dose“. The primary outcome was the occurance of thrombotic events, and the secondary outcomes were bleeding, mortality, and other ICU-related complications.ResultsA total of 758 patients were screened; 565 patients were included in the study. We matched 352 patients using propensity score matching (1:1). In patients who received escalated dose pharmacological VTE prophylaxis, any case of thrombosis and VTE were similar between the two groups (OR 1.22;95 %CI 0.52–2.86; P = 0.64 and OR 0.75; 95% CI 0.16–3.38; P = 0.70 respectively). However, the odds of minor bleeding was higher in patients who received escalated VTE prophylaxis dose (OR 3.39; 95% CI 1.08–10.61; P = 0.04). There was no difference in the 30-day mortality nor in-hospital mortality between the two groups (HR 1.17;95 %CI0.79–1.73; P = 0.43 and HR 1.08;95 %CI 0.76–1.53; P = 0.83, respectively).ConclusionEscalated-dose pharmacological VTE prophylaxis in critically ill patients with COVID-19 was not associated with thrombosis, or mortality benefits but led to an increased risk of minor bleeding. This study supports previous evidence regarding the optimal dosing VTE pharmacological prophylaxis regimen for critically ill patients with COVID-19.