复合切口疝补片修补腹壁巨大切口疝30例分析

目的 分析应用聚丙烯和聚四氟乙烯复合切口疝补片修补腹壁巨大切口疝的临床效果，讨论应用复合补片的手术方法和经验体会。方法 1999年5月～2005年5月应用复合切口疝补片修补腹壁巨大切口疝30例，其中皮下置片法12例，腹腔内法18例。平均随访期36个月。结果 术后复发2例，占6．7％。切口并发症33．3％，切口感染5例，均为皮下法；皮下积液5例，其中皮下法3例，腹腔内法2例。结论 腹壁巨大切口疝，特别是传统法难以修补的，可应用聚丙烯和聚四氟乙烯复合补片修补。应用腹腔内法及正确的术中、术后处理可减少术后并发症的发生。     

应用聚丙烯补片修补腹壁切口疝20例

腹壁切口疝是腹部手术后常见的并发症之一,传统的修补方法存在较高的复发率,可达30%～50%[1],其根本原因是在有张力下修补。上世纪90年代中期,以补片为基础的无张力修补技术逐渐成为修补腹壁切口疝的主要术式。2001年1月～2004年1月我院采用人工合成材料网状聚丙烯补片行切口疝     

复合补片修补腹壁切口疝

腹壁切口疝是腹部外科手术后常见的并发症。据报道,腹部手术后腹壁切口疝的发生率为11％～20％。单纯直接缝合修补腹壁切口疝的术后复发率可高达50％左右,故应用合成材料修补腹壁切口疝,特别是用于修补腹壁巨大切口疝已成为共识。修补材料有多种,聚脂材料因较多并发症而逐渐被淘汰。目前应用较多的是聚丙烯和聚四氟乙烯(polytetrafluoroethylene,PTFE)材料,前者因易与腹腔内肠管粘连,     

应用补片修补巨大腹壁切口疝26例临床分析

目的总结补片修补巨大腹壁切口疝患者的临床经验。方法回顾性分析2001年6月，2005年5月经我院诊治的26例巨大腹壁切口疝患者的临床资料。结果26例均痊愈出院，无心肺衰竭等严重并发症，随访3-6个月无复发。结论补片修补术是治疗巨大腹壁切口疝的理想方法。     

开放式腹壁大切口疝和巨大切口疝补片修补术

目的探讨腹壁大切口疝和巨大切口疝治疗经验。方法对我院采用补片行开放式腹壁大切口疝和巨大切口疝修补术的51例患者临床资料进行回顾性分析。结果采用肌前补片修补法3例,肌肉间补片修补法3例,肌后腹膜前补片修补法39例,腹腔内补片修补法6例。手术时间109~195 min,平均135.2 min;术中出血15~90 ml,平均35.6 ml;术中无血管和内脏损伤等并发症。术后3~7 d(平均4.9 d)下床活动;住院时间7~19 d,平均9.7 d。2例患者术后出现浆液肿,经穿刺抽吸、负压吸引和腹带加压包扎后治愈。51例患者随访12~36个月(平均24.5个月),3例(5.9%)患者复发,后行开放式腹腔内补片修补手术,恢复良好,无再复发。所有病例无慢性疼痛。结论应用补片行开放式腹壁大切口疝和巨大切口疝修补术是一种安全、可靠的方法,复发率低。     

Bard Composix补片修补巨大切口疝临床应用

目的 总结应用Bard Composix补片修补4例巨大切口疝的临床经验。方法 使用美国巴德公司的Composix补片对4例巨大腹壁切口疝进行修补术治疗。结果 4例病人均无并发症,随访1～11个月无复发。结论 Composix补片修补巨大切口疝具有安全、创伤小、恢复快的优点,是治疗切口疝的理想术式。     

单丝聚丙烯补片修补老年腹壁巨大切口疝治疗体会

目的 分析应用单丝聚丙烯补片修补老年腹壁巨大切口疝的治疗效果.方法 采集2006年1月至2009年12月我院老年巨大切口疝患者36例,使用单丝聚丙烯补片修补,其中肌鞘前修补(Onlay法)12例,肌肉与肌肉间修补(Inlay法)5例,肌肉后腹膜前修补(Sublay法)19例.结果 无切口感染,皮下积液6例,均为Onlay法,9例有不同程度异物感,但不妨碍日常生活.平均随访24个月,无复发.结论 应用单丝聚丙烯补片无张力修补老年腹壁巨大切口疝,可取得满意疗效,采用妥善的术中、术后处理方法,可减少术后并发症的发生.     

应用补片治疗腹壁巨大切口疝(附27例报告)

切口疝是腹部手术后常见的并发症之一，其发生率为2％-11％。而疝环最大距离≥10cm的腹壁巨大切口疝(abdominal giant incisional hernia，AGIH)治疗棘手，复发率高，对机体影响严重，常给病人造成极大痛苦与不便。我院自1998年4月至2003年4月诊治AGIH共27例．治疗效果满意，现报告如下。     

双层聚丙烯补片在腹壁切口疝修补中的应用

目的探讨应用人工合成材料双层聚丙烯补片修补腹壁切口疝的效果。方法 21例腹壁切口疝（15例大切口疝和及6例巨大切口疝）患者采用双层聚丙烯补片行无张力修补,对术中及术后情况进行分析。结果全组病例手术顺利,手术时间87～189min,平均123min。无严重并发症发生,痊愈出院。术后随访5～36个月（平均17个月）,无复发病例。结论双层聚丙烯补片修补中下腹壁大切口疝及巨大切口疝是一种安全、有效的方法 ,是临床上治疗切口疝可供选择的一种手术方式。     

应用补片治疗腹壁巨大切口疝19例报告

腹壁切口疝是腹部手术后常见的并发症,传统的修补方法复发率高达30%~50%。尤其是腹壁巨大切口疝,患者痛苦大,治疗棘手。我院2001年1月至2005年12月实施无张力人工材料疝修补术治疗腹壁巨大切口疝19例,现报告如下。临床资料1.一般资料:本组19例,男6例,女13例。年龄37~78岁,平均61岁。疝环直径10~16.5cm,平均13.2cm。初次切口疝15例,复发疝4例。2.材料:美国强生公司提供的聚丙烯单丝编织的不可吸收材料,网片规格15cm×15cm,30cm×30cm等。3.手术方法:均采用连续硬膜外麻醉,使腹壁肌肉完全松弛。原手术切口入路,切除切口瘢痕。充分游离皮下组织…     

应用人工材料行腹肌后筋膜前修补治疗切口疝80例

目的:总结应用人工材料修补腹壁切口疝的经验。方法:回顾分析我院以单丝编织聚丙烯网片修补的80例腹部切口疝的临床资料。结果:全组无围手术期死亡,1例术后24h内出现急性左心功能衰竭,经对症处理后治愈。全组无切口感染,无血肿形成;拔除引流管后皮下血肿形成1例,无窦道形成。平均住院(14.3±6.5)d。获随访者73例,无复发病例。结论:人工材料腹肌后筋膜前修补术是治疗腹壁切口疝的优良术式;对于疝环横径>10cm或疝内容物多、突出时间较长的巨大切口疝病人应予充分的术前准备。     

Laparoscopic versus open incisional hernia repair

Background Incisional hernia is a common complication of abdominal surgery, and it is often a source of morbidity and high costs for health care. This is a case-control study to compare laparoscopic versus anterior-open incisional hernia repair. Methods 170 patients with incisional hernia were enrolled in this study between September 2001 and December 2004. Of these, 85 underwent anterior-open repair (open group: OG), and 85 underwent laparoscopic repair (laparoscopic group: LG). The clinical outcome was determined by a median follow-up of 24.0 months for LG and OG. Results No difference was noticed between the two groups in age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, body mass index (BMI), and incisional hernia diameter. Mean operative time was 61.0 min for LG patients and 150.9 min for OG patients (p < .05). Mean hospitalization was 2.7 days for LG patients and 9.9 days for OG patients (p < .05). Mean return to work was 13 days (range, 6–15 days) in LG patients and 25 days (range, 16–30 days) in OG patients. Complications occurred in 16.4 % of LG patients and 29.4 % of OG patients, with a relapse rate of 2.3% in LG and 1.1% in OG patients. Conclusions Short-term results indicate that laparoscopic incisional hernia repair is associated with a shorter operative time and hospitalization, a faster return to work, and a lower incidence of wound infections and major complications compared to the anterior-open procedure. Further studies and longer follow-up are required to confirm these findings.     

腹腔镜复合补片无张力修补术治疗腹壁切口疝的临床体会

目的:探讨腹腔镜复合补片无张力修补术治疗腹壁切口疝的应用价值及可靠性。方法:回顾分析2007年1月至2012年1月为56例患者行腹腔镜复合补片修补术的临床资料。结果:3例因广泛粘连中转开腹,53例成功完成手术。手术时间70～320 min,中位手术时间110 min。术中发现隐匿性疝2例。术后Ⅰ级护理时间1天,术后24 h即恢复进食并下床活动。术后发生较长时间疼痛1例、感染1例。随访至今均未发现复发。结论:术后并发切口疝的患者于腹腔镜下分离粘连、采用复合补片修补是安全可行的。     

腹腔镜与开放式巨大腹壁切口疝补片修补术的对比分析

目的:比较开放手术及腹腔镜补片修补巨大腹壁切口疝的手术效果。方法:回顾分析我院2003年1月至2007年6月收治的43例巨大腹壁切口疝患者的临床资料。根据手术方式分为腹腔镜组(16例)和开放组(27例),对两组手术时间、术后并发症、术后住院时间等进行对比分析。结果:两组手术时间、术后并发症发生率无明显差异。开放手术组2例发生切口感染,1例经冲洗引流2个月治愈,另1例再次手术取出补片。腹腔镜手术组术后住院时间和手术出血量明显少于开放手术组。术后随访4~48个月,平均21个月,两组均无复发病例。结论:腹腔镜下应用补片修补巨大腹壁切口疝同样安全、合理,且具有患者创伤小、康复快和术后住院时间短等优点。     

Results of laparoscopic versus open abdominal and incisional hernia repair.

BACKGROUND: Incisional hernia is a frequent complication of abdominal surgery. The object of this study was to confirm the safety, efficacy, and feasibility of laparoscopic treatment of abdominal wall defects. METHODS: Fifty consecutive laparoscopic abdominal and incisional hernia repairs from September 2001 to May 2003 were compared with 50 open anterior repairs. RESULTS: The 2 groups were not different for age, body mass index, or American Society of Anaesthesiologists scores. Mean operative time was 59 minutes for the laparoscopic group, 164.5 minutes for the open group. Mean hernia diameter was 10.6 cm for the laparoscopic group, 10.5 cm for the open group. Mean length of stay was 2.1 days for the laparoscopic group, 8.1 days for the open group. Complications occurred in 16% of the laparoscopic and 50% of open group. Median follow-up was 9.0 months for the laparoscopic group, 24.5 months for the open group. Recurrence rates were 2% for laparoscopic group and 0% for the open group. CONCLUSION: Results for laparoscopic abdominal and incisional hernia repair seem to be superior to results for open repair in terms of operative time, length of stay, wound infection, major complications, and overall hospital reimbursement.     

腹壁切口疝的外科治疗(附53例临床分析)

目的总结治疗腹壁切口疝的临床经验.方法对1994年4月～2002年8月53例腹壁切口疝患者在年龄、手术方法、引流放置,抗生素应用及预后进行回顾性分析.结果53例患者采用人工合成材料或直接缝合修补.术后切口积液3例,无切口感染.随访时间3月～5年,治愈46例,复发7例.结论腹壁切口疝是腹部手术后常见的并发症之一,尤其是老年患者.合理使用人工合成材料及直接缝合修补法适可以获得良好的治疗效果.     

Laparoscopic mesh repair of incisional hernia: an alternative to the conventional open repair?

Background Tension-free incisional hernia repair using alloplastic material increasingly replaces conventional repair techniques. This change resulted in a decreased recurrence rate (50% vs. 10%, respectively). Recently, laparoscopic approaches for the intraperitoneal tension-free mesh application have been introduced. The decreased trauma at the incision site and the reduction in wound infections appear to be the main advantages. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the early and long-term complications as well as patients’ contentment. Methods Laparoscopic hernia repair with intraperitoneal polytetrafluroethylene (PTFE) mesh implantation was performed on 62 patients at the Klinikum Grosshadern between 2000 and 2005 (29 males, 33 females age 60.7). Intra- and postoperative complications were registered prospectively and retrospectively analyzed. In addition, 57 patients were evaluated for recurrence, postoperative pain and patient contentment (median follow-up 409 days). Results A low complication rate was observed in our patient collective. One trocar bleeding occurred. Three patients presented with wound hematoma. The recurrence rate was 8% (2/25). Sixty-two percent of the patients were free of complaints postoperatively. Eighty-five percent would once again choose the laparoscopic approach for incisional hernia repair. Conclusion The laparoscopic technique was associated with a low recurrence rate, a small rate of wound infections and high patient comfort. Thus, the laparoscopic approach for mesh implantation appears to be a safe and effective method for the treatment of incisional hernias. The efficiency for laparoscopic intraperitoneal mesh implantation, however, should be further evaluated within a prospectively randomized multicenter trial. M. Stickel and M. Rentsch contributed equally.     

Abdominal wall compliance after Marlex® mesh implantation for incisional hernia repair

Summary In view of the poor results of suturing techniques, incisional hernias are often best repaired with biomaterials. Their use brings the recurrence rate to below 10%, but patients sometimes complain of discomfort and restricted abdominal mobility. We report our experience with 41 patients after implantation of a Marlex®-mesh in a preperitoneal, retromuscular position (mean follow-up period 16.7 months). The effect of implanted meshes on abdominal wall mobility was measured noninvasively with the aid of three dimensional stereography and compared with a non-operated healthy control group (n = 21). The commonest early postoperative complication was seroma in 32% of cases, usually relieved by aspiration. Infection and hematoma were less frequent at 4.9% and 12.2% respectively. Three patients developed a recurrent hernia. During follow-up 7.3% experienced pain during heavy activities, 29.3% during daily activities and 4.9% at rest. Three dimensional stereography showed a highly significant (p < 0.001) decrease in abdominal wall mobility following mesh implantation, compared to a non-operated control group. Improved composition of the mesh material involving a smaller proportion of polypropylene and greater elasticity, should be considered for the future, in order to reduce patient discomfort.The study was supported by BIOMAT (Interdisciplinary Centre of Clinical Investigation, RWTH Aachen).