IgG4 Production Against Adalimumab During Long Term Treatment of RA Patients

Purpose

A substantial part of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients is chronically treated with adalimumab. Some of these patients produce antibodies against adalimumab, which correlate with lower serum drug levels and reduced clinical response. Long term exposure to antigens may result in antigen specific IgG4 production as was demonstrated in studies on prolonged exposure to antigens such as different allergens, Factor VIII and IFN-β. Here, we investigate whether long term treatment of RA patients with the therapeutic monoclonal antibody adalimumab leads to the production of specific IgG4 antibodies.

Methods

We developed radio immunoassays to detect total IgG or IgG4 against adalimumab and applied these in a cohort of 271 consecutive RA patients during 3?years of adalimumab treatment.

Results

In 32?% of the 271 patients antibodies against adalimumab were detectable. IgG4 antibodies were detected in 29?% of the patients. The proportion IgG4 of total IgG against adalimumab varies widely between patients, and IgG4 was found to contribute significantly to the anti drug antibody (ADA) response in some patients.

Conclusion

In the immune response against adalimumab in adalimumab-treated RA patients a considerable part of the ADA is IgG4. Although IgG4 is often considered to be harmless due to its lack of effector function, neutralization of adalimumab by IgG4 antibodies will lead to a reduced clinical response.     

Antibodies to constant domains of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies: anti-hinge antibodies in immunogenicity testing

Rheumatoid factors are antibodies directed against IgG that may confound immunogenicity testing for therapeutic monoclonal antibodies. We developed antigen-binding assays to monitor anti-drug-antibody (ADA) responses against infliximab and adalimumab using F(ab')2 fragments of the drug. This avoids possible detection of rheumatoid factor activity. During development of these assays, a number of sera from patients before treatment as well as several healthy control sera were tested positive. None of these sera contained antibodies specific for the therapeutic mAb. Instead, they were found to contain anti-hinge antibodies. We demonstrate that this aspecific antibody binding can be inhibited by adding F(ab')2 of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), which consists of pooled polyclonal IgG derived from plasma. Using this protocol, anti-infliximab antibodies can be measured specifically without interference by anti-hinge antibodies.     

An Affinity Capture Elution (ACE) assay for detection of anti-drug antibody to monoclonal antibody therapeutics in the presence of high levels of drug

Monoclonal antibody therapeutics typically have relatively long half-lives and can be dosed at high levels. Although formation of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) is relatively rare, detection of these antibodies can be very difficult in the presence of high circulating levels of drug. Typically these ADA are detected by bridging ELISAs which can be very sensitive to even low levels of drug. We describe an ELISA method based on affinity capture of ADA on solid-phase drug followed by removal of excess free drug, release and transfer of bound ADA and subsequent detection using biotinylated drug. The assay is both sensitive and highly tolerant to free drug with detection of 500 ng/ml of ADA readily achieved in the presence of 500 mug/ml of drug.     

Immunoassay methods used in clinical studies for the detection of anti‐drug antibodies to adalimumab and infliximab

We examined the assay formats used to detect anti‐drug antibodies (ADA) in clinical studies of the anti‐tumour necrosis factor (TNF) monoclonal antibodies adalimumab and infliximab in chronic inflammatory disease and their potential impact on pharmacokinetic and clinical outcomes. Using findings of a recent systematic literature review of the immunogenicity of 11 biological/biosimilar agents, we conducted an ancillary qualitative review of a subset of randomized controlled trials and observational studies of the monoclonal antibodies against anti‐TNF factor adalimumab and infliximab. Among studies of adalimumab and infliximab, the immunoassay method used to detect antibodies was reported in 91 of 111 (82%) and 154 of 206 (75%) adalimumab and infliximab studies, respectively. In most adalimumab and infliximab studies, an enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay or radioimmunoassay was used [85 of 91 (93%) and 134 of 154 (87%), respectively]. ADA incidence varied widely among assays and inflammatory diseases (adalimumab, 0–87%; infliximab, 0–79%). Pharmacokinetic and clinical outcomes were only reported for ADA‐positive patients in 38 of 91 (42%) and 61 of 154 (40%) adalimumab and infliximab studies, respectively. Regardless of assay format or biological used, ADA formation was associated with lower serum concentrations, reduced efficacy and elevated rates of infusion‐related reactions. Consistent with previous recommendations to improve interpretation of immunogenicity data for biologicals, greater consistency in reporting of assay methods and clinical consequences of ADA formation may prove useful. Additional standardization in immunogenicity testing and reporting, application of modern, robust assays that satisfy current regulatory expectations and implementation of international standards for marketed products may help to improve our understanding of the impact of immunogenicity to biologics.     

Development and validation of a homogeneous mobility shift assay for the measurement of infliximab and antibodies-to-infliximab levels in patient serum

Antibody-based drugs such as infliximab (IFX) are effective for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and other immune-mediated disorders. The development of antibodies against these drugs may result in unfavorable consequences, including the loss of drug efficacy, hypersensitivity reactions, and other adverse events. Therefore, accurate monitoring of serum drug and anti-drug antibody levels should be an important part of therapy for patients being treated with an antibody-based drug. Current methods for the assessment of anti-drug antibodies and drug levels, involving various bridging ELISA and radioimmunoassay techniques, are limited by their sensitivity, interference, and/or complexity. To overcome these limitations, we have developed a non-radiolabeled homogeneous mobility shift assay (HMSA) to measure the antibodies-to-infliximab (ATI) and IFX levels in serum samples. Full method validation was performed on both the ATI- and IFX-HMSA, and the clinical sample test results were also compared with those obtained from a bridging ELISA method to evaluate the difference in performance between the two assays. Validation of the ATI-HMSA revealed a lower limit of quantitation of 0.012 μg/mL in serum. The linear range of quantitation was 0.029-0.54 μg/mL. The intra- and inter-assay precision was less than 20% of coefficient of variation (CV), and the accuracy (% error) of the assay was less than 20%. In serum samples, ATI as low as 0.036 μg/mL can be measured, even in the presence of 60 μg/mL of IFX in the serum. Sera from 100 healthy subjects were tested to determine the cut point of the assay. ATI-positive samples that had been previously analyzed by using a bridging ELISA from 100 patients were also measured by the new method. There was a high correlation between the two methods for ATI levels (p<0.001). Significantly, the new method identified five false-positive samples from the bridging ELISA method. Validation of the mobility shift IFX assay also showed high assay sensitivity, precision and accuracy. The HMSA method may also be applied to other protein-based drugs to accurately detect serum drug and anti-drug antibody levels.     

Anti-drug antibodies in psoriasis: a critical evaluation of clinical significance and impact on treatment response

TNF inhibitors and anti-p40IL12/23 monoclonal antibodies are efficacious treatments for moderate-to-severe psoriasis. However, the formation of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) with biologics may prevent patients from achieving a full clinical response. ADA have been reported in patients treated with etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab or ustekinumab at rates of 0–18.3%, 5.4–43.6%, 8.8–44.8% and 3.8–5.4%, respectively. Antibodies against etanercept have no apparent effects on clinical response, whereas antibodies against infliximab or adalimumab have been associated with diminished clinical response. The significance of ADA against ustekinumab is yet to be determined. Data regarding management strategies to counteract ADA formation and their effects are limited in psoriasis patients. However, some evidence suggests that concomitant immunomodulators such as methotrexate may suppress ADA development in psoriasis. ADA specific to one biologic do not appear to carry cross-linking potential with other biologic agents. ADA formation needs to be considered as a possible factor contributing to diminished response from biologic agents.     

Improvement of drug tolerance in immunogenicity testing by acid treatment on Biacore

Detection of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) can be difficult, if not impossible, in the presence of drug in the sample. This is a particular concern with therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), which have typically longer half-lives than other proteins. For detection of ADA in presence of high drug concentrations, assay choice is limited to ELISA-like methods, capable of incorporating acid dissociation procedures to separate drug-ADA immune complexes. To our knowledge, Biacore assays have not been shown to be directly compatible with acid dissociation procedures, until now. As a consequence, steps to ensure adequate clearance of the drug are prerequisite to enable sensitive detection of ADA. Here we describe the development of a novel, rapid and highly drug tolerant Biacore method that uses an acid dissociation step to detect ADA in the presence of excess drug in human serum. Removal of drug after acid treatment is not required.     

Transferon™, a peptide mixture with immunomodulatory properties is not immunogenic when administered with various adjuvants

Transferon, a human dialyzable leukocyte extract (hDLE), is a biotherapeutic that comprises a complex mixture of low-molecular-weight peptides (3, incomplete Freund's adjuvant (IFA), or Titermax Gold. The inoculation scheme entailed three routes of administration (intraperitoneal, Day 1; subcutaneous, Day 7; and intramuscular, Day 14) using 200?μg Transferon/inoculation. Serum samples were collected on Day 21. Total IgG levels were quantitated by affinity chromatography, and specific antibodies against components of Transferon were analyzed by dot-blot and ELISA. Ovalbumin (OVA, 44?kDa) and peptides from hydrolyzed collagen (PFHC,?相似文献   

Recommendations on risk-based strategies for detection and characterization of antibodies against biotechnology products

The appropriate evaluation of the immunogenicity of biopharmaceuticals is of major importance for their successful development and licensure. Antibodies elicited by these products in many cases cause no detectable clinical effects in humans. However, antibodies to some therapeutic proteins have been shown to cause a variety of clinical consequences ranging from relatively mild to serious adverse events. In addition, antibodies can affect drug efficacy. In non-clinical studies, anti-drug antibodies (ADA) can complicate interpretation of the toxicity, pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) data. Therefore, it is important to develop testing strategies that provide valid assessments of antibody responses in both non-clinical and clinical studies. This document provides recommendations for antibody testing strategies stemming from the experience of contributing authors. The recommendations are intended to foster a more unified approach to antibody testing across the biopharmaceutical industry. The strategies proposed are also expected to contribute to better understanding of antibody responses and to further advance immunogenicity evaluation.     

Immunogenicity of protein therapeutics

Protein therapeutics, such as monoclonal antibodies, enzymes and toxins, hold significant promise for improving human health. However, repeated administration of protein therapeutics, whether natural or recombinant, often leads to the induction of undesirable anti-drug antibodies (ADAs), which interfere with or neutralize the effect of the drug. Although an immune response to foreign proteins can be expected and is well understood, the basis for the development of responses to therapeutic autologous proteins is the subject of some debate. Inflammatory components of the drug delivery vehicle, T cell responses, T and B cell epitopes in the protein drug, and the associated B cell response are all targets for interventions aimed at reducing ADA responses. Here, we review some theories put forward to explain the immunogenicity of therapeutic proteins and describe some emerging protein-engineering approaches that might prevent the development of anti-drug antibodies.     

Personalized medicine in rheumatoid arthritis: How immunogenicity impacts use of TNF inhibitors

Up to 40% of patients treated with tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors (TNFi) do not respond to therapy. Testing drug bioavailability and/or anti-drug antibody (ADAb) levels may justify dosage adjustment or switch to different drugs, enabling a personalized medicine approach.We report a multicenter cross-sectional study on different methods [ELISA and a cell based functional assay (reporter gene assay – RGA)] for drug/ADAb detection, and on the relationship between drug bioavailability and ADAb. 163 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with infliximab (IFX; n = 67), adalimumab (ADL; n = 49) or etanercept (ETA; n = 47) were tested for drug and ADAb levels. Furthermore, we report prospective data from additional 70 patients (59 RA and 11 juvenile idiopathic arthritis - JIA) tested for drug and ADAb levels at baseline (T0) and after 3 (T3) and 6 months (T6) of treatment with ADL or ETA only. IFX-treated patients were not included because of the increasing use of IFX biosimilars. Stringent inclusion criteria were used in order to avoid unwanted variables in both studies; none of the patients used TNFi before the study, and TNFi was used only in combination with methotrexate. Clinical response was defined according to EULAR response criteria.The two assays performed comparably in the comparison study. Accordingly, ELISA was selected for the prospective study because of its feasibility in the clinical setting. The cross-sectional study found ADAb in IFX and ADL treated groups only, that were associated with a decrease in pharmacological drug availability in the blood. Comparable results were found for the ADL-treated group in the prospective study which also showed a relationship between drug/ADAb levels and the loss of clinical response. Altogether our findings support drug and anti-drug Ab monitoring in the real-world clinical setting thus enabling individualized treatment and reducing disability in chronic inflammatory arthritis.     

Correlation between ELISA,hemagglutination inhibition,and neutralization tests after vaccination against tick-borne encephalitis

The significance of IgG antibody levels determined by a binding assay (ELISA) was investigated as a surrogate marker for the presence of neutralizing and hemagglutination inhibiting antibodies in sera from individuals vaccinated against tick-borne encephalitis (TBE). To assess the extent of interference by flavivirus cross-reactive antibodies, sera from persons with a proven or suspected history of other flavivirus infections and/or vaccinations were also examined. An excellent and highly significant correlation was found between ELISA IgG units and the antibody titers obtained by the hemagglutination inhibition (HI) as well as by the neutralization test (NT), provided that there was no other exposure to flavivirus antigens except TBE vaccination. Yellow fever vaccination and/or dengue virus infections induced significant levels of antibodies reactive in the TBE ELISA and HI test, which did not exhibit, however, neutralizing activity against TBE virus. The phenomenon and problem of “original antigenic sin” was demonstrated in a TBE vaccinee with a history of previous flavivirus infections. TBE vaccination first induced a booster reaction resulting in a rise in the level of cross-reactive antibodies only, whereas TBE virus-neutralizing antibodies became detectable only after the third vaccination. It is concluded that the level of IgG antibodies determined by ELISA is a good marker for predicting the presence of neutralizing antibodies after TBE vaccination, but only in the absence of flavivirus cross-reactive antibodies. Otherwise, a neutralization assay is necessary for assessing immunity. © 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Practical quantitative and kinetic applications of bio-layer interferometry for toxicokinetic analysis of a monoclonal antibody therapeutic

Bio-layer interferometry (BLI) is a label-free technology that can be used for kinetic characterization of proteins. Although other label-free platforms have been used for quantitation purposes (most notably surface plasmon resonance), little work has been done using BLI. Here we present rationale and strategies for the development and analytical qualification of a BLI assay for the quantitation of a humanized antibody therapeutic in cynomolgus monkey plasma. Results of the qualification were compared to those of a validated ELISA used to quantitate the same therapeutic. Selectivity, matrix effect, and precision and accuracy were similar between the two methods. Target interference was more pronounced in the BLI assay compared to the ELISA. The main difference between the two assays was in the dynamic range (0.1-10 μg/mL for ELISA vs. 0.4-50 μg/mL for BLI). The monkey plasma BLI assay was applied to rat plasma for the comparison of study samples generated in the same matrix by ELISA. A direct quantitation comparison of sample results for the two methods shows a high degree of agreement (r(2)=0.979, slope=1.017). However, an evaluation of low concentration samples showed a bias of over-recovery in the BLI compared to the ELISA. In addition to utilizing the quantitative capabilities of the platform, we evaluated the utility of using the kinetic properties of the quantitative assay to detect anti-drug antibodies (ADA) and illustrated the potential for ADA to cause either over recovery (non-neutralizing ADA) or under recovery (neutralizing ADA) of a biotherapeutic using the BLI assay.     

The case for measuring anti-drug antibodies in people with multiple sclerosis

The advent of biopharmaceuticals (BPs) has led to significant improvements in the treatment of many chronic inflammatory diseases, and the number of BPs on the market and of diseases treated reflects their success. However, repetitive parenteral administration and intrinsic immunogenic properties of the drug can elicit an immune response, leading to production of anti-drug antibodies (ADA). This is a major limitation of the use of BPs and has to be taken into consideration in clinical practice and during drug development. With increasing knowledge about the immunogenicity of BPs and regular ADA testing in patients, we ensure optimized long-term treatment for the individual and thus optimal use of health care resources. This field has already been extensively investigated in the treatment of multiple sclerosis with IFN-β, but there is a clear need for consensus from academia, health care providers and the BP industry in managing ADA across all BPs and diseases.     

Reporter gene assay for the quantification of the activity and neutralizing antibody response to TNFα antagonists

A cell-based assay has been developed for the quantification of the activity of TNFα antagonists based on human erythroleukemic K562 cells transfected with a NFκB regulated firefly luciferase reporter-gene construct. Both drug activity and anti-drug neutralizing antibodies can be quantified with a high degree of precision within 2h, and without interference from cytokines and other factors known to activate NFκB. The assay cells also contain the Renilla luciferase reporter gene under the control of a constitutive promoter that allows TNFα-induced firefly luciferase activity to be normalized relative to Renilla luciferase expression. Thus, results are independent of cell number or differences in cell viability, resulting in intra and inter assay coefficients of variation of 10% or less. Normalization of results relative to the expression of an internal standard also provides a means for correcting for serum matrix effects and allows residual drug levels or anti-drug neutralizing antibodies to be quantified even in serum samples with a relatively high degree of cytotoxicity.     

The influence of naturally occurring heterophilic anti-immunoglobulin antibodies on direct measurement of serum proteins using sandwich ELISAs

Sandwich ELISAs have become a widely used method for the quantitative detection of serum proteins. However, they can be biased by a variety of interfering substances. As reported recently, we observed false-positive levels of interferon (IFN)-alpha and -beta in up to 27% of sera from healthy blood donors using commercial ELISAs. We now demonstrate that two different groups of naturally occurring heterophilic antibodies (IgG-type) are responsible for these titers. Group I (representing 85% of positive samples) binds to the Fab region of IgG from goat, mouse, rat, horse, and bovidae (but not rabbit). Group II (15%) recognizes an epitope in the Fc region of mouse, horse, bovine, and rabbit (but not goat or rat) immunoglobulins. The antibodies did not crossreact with human IgG subclasses but contributed to false-positive IgG rheumatoid factor levels obtained using a commercially available ELISA. To investigate the susceptibility of assays to these artifacts, various combinations of capture and detection antibodies have been tested. On this basis, we defined the relative risks that standard ELISAs might be influenced by heterophilic anti-immunoglobulin antibodies. In general, assays that use monoclonal antibodies for both capture and detection are less susceptible than others which include at least one polyclonal antiserum. However, only systems utilizing rabbit F(ab')(2) fragments have been found to be immune to this interference.     

Recommendations for the design, optimization, and qualification of cell-based assays used for the detection of neutralizing antibody responses elicited to biological therapeutics

The administration of biological therapeutics can evoke some level of immune response to the drug product in the receiving subjects. An immune response comprised of neutralizing antibodies can lead to loss of efficacy or potentially more serious clinical sequelae. Therefore, it is important to monitor the immunogenicity of biological therapeutics throughout the drug product development cycle. Immunoassays are typically used to screen for the presence and development of anti-drug product antibodies. However, in-vitro cell-based assays prove extremely useful for the characterization of immunoassay-positive samples to determine if the detected antibodies have neutralizing properties. This document provides scientific recommendations based on the experience of the authors for the development of cell-based assays for the detection of neutralizing antibodies in non-clinical and clinical studies.     

Isolation of human anti-idiotypic antibodies by phage display for clinical immune response assays

The clinical development of therapeutic proteins requires assays that measure the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of, and the potential immune response (IR) to, the protein agent. Each assay requires reagents that are highly specific for the therapeutic protein. For therapeutic monoclonal antibodies, anti-CDR-specific, or anti-idiotypic (anti-id), antibodies are an ideal class of reagents suitable for these assays because of their high specificity and affinity to the drug antibody. We generated anti-ids to two human antibodies by antibody phage display using the MorphoSys HuCAL GOLD Fab library. To selectively target the CDR regions, serum and a framework-matched mAb were included as competitors during the phage selection process. Panels of CDR-specific Fabs, with low to sub-nM affinities, were isolated against both targets. The CDR specificity of these Fabs was shown by their lack of binding to a framework-matched control mAb and by competition of this binding with the soluble antigens of the respective therapeutic mAb targets. The candidate anti-id Fabs were able to detect both immobilized and soluble target Ab without being affected by serum, a requirement for both PK assay and the IR bridging assay format. Combinations of the Fabs for PK detection assays were identified by pairwise binding studies, although the pair for one target mAb lacks the desired sensitivity for PK assays. To evaluate their potential as anti-drug antibodies (ADAs), the best Fabs for one of the targets were converted and produced as the required bivalent human mAbs. In comparison to rodent mAbs and primate polyclonal serum, the phage display derived human mAbs were equally effective as reference standards. Our results demonstrate that competition-based phage selection can be an effective method for the isolation of anti-idiotypic antibodies for PK and IR assay development, and in this latter case, overcome limitations of current methods using rodent derived anti-ids.