Clinical prediction of normotension in borderline hypertensive men--a 10 year study

OBJECTIVE: To investigate 24-h ambulatory blood pressure measurements (ABPM) as a tool for long-term prediction of future blood pressure (BP) status in high normal and low stage 1 hypertensives. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 165 men from a population screening program with diastolic BP (DBP) 85-94 mmHg and a systolic BP (SBP) < 150 mmHg performed a 24-h ABPM. Ten years later, 120 participants (73%) returned for renewed measurements. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Blood pressure status at 10 years. RESULTS: At the 10-year follow-up, 53% of the participants were classified as hypertensive (HT) (BP > or = 140/90 or taking anti-hypertensive medication) and 47% were classified as normotensive (NT) (BP < 140/90 mmHg). There was no significant baseline differences in office SBP levels between those who were normotensive or hypertensive at follow-up (136/91 versus 138/92 mmHg), whereas both SBP and DBP night-time levels were significantly lower in the future normotensives as compared to the future hypertensives (107/69 versus 112/74 mmHg, P < 0.01). Using recommended normalcy night-time ABP levels of < 120/75 mmHg in addition to office BP (140/90) at baseline, over 85% of the subjects were correctly classified provided they met both clinic and ambulatory night-time criteria for HT and NT classification at baseline. CONCLUSION: The use of ABPM in addition to office BP's in patients with borderline hypertension greatly increases the possibility of identifying those individuals who are at a very small risk of developing future hypertension. This could potentially lead to considerable savings in both patient anxiety, physician time and resource consumption.     

How reliable is isolated clinical hypertension defined by a single 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring?

BACKGROUND: Isolated clinical hypertension (ICH) is characterized by a persistently elevated clinic blood pressure in the presence of a normal day-time or 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (ABP). This definition is based on a single ABP monitoring (ABPM) and little attention has been focused on the reproducibility of this condition. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the reliability of the criteria currently recommended by major hypertension guidelines to detect ICH based on a single 24-h ABPM session. METHODS: A total of 611 never-treated grade 1 and 2 hypertensive patients (mean age 46 +/- 12 years) referred for the first time to our out-patient clinic, underwent repeated clinic blood pressure measurements, routine investigations, two 24-h periods of ABPM 1-4 weeks apart, cardiac and carotid ultrasound examinations. ABPM was always performed over a working day and the same daily activities were recommended during the two periods. ICH was diagnosed by the following criteria: (i) mean daytime values < 135/85 mmHg or (ii) mean 24-h blood pressure values < 125/80 mmHg during the first ABPM. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of ICH was 7.1% according to criterion (i) and 5.4% according to criterion (ii). Twenty (46.6%) of the 43 patients with mean daytime blood pressure values < 135/85 mmHg during the first ABPM, exceeded this cut-off value during the second ABPM period. Twenty-two (66.6%) of the 33 patients with mean 24-h blood pressure values < 120/80 mmHg during the first ABPM did not confirm a normal blood pressure profile during the second ABPM recording. Cardiovascular involvement was significantly lower in subjects with persistent normal ABP compared to those with non-reproducible ICH pattern or sustained hypertensives. CONCLUSIONS: These findings clearly indicate that: (i) the classification of ICH on the basis of a single ABPM, using the cut-offs suggested by major hypertension guidelines, has a limited short-term reproducibility and (ii) repeated ABPM recordings should be recommended to correctly diagnose patients with ICH and improve cardiovascular risk stratification.     

Identification of subjects with white-coat hypertension and persistently normal ambulatory blood pressure

OBJECTIVE: To assess the spontaneous changes in clinic blood pressure, ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) and left ventricular structure in untreated subjects with white-coat hypertension (WCH). DESIGN: A prospective observational study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 83 untreated subjects with WCH, 24 h non-invasive ABP monitoring and echocardiographic studies of the left ventricle were repeated after 0.5-6.5 years (mean 2.5) in the absence of antihypertensive drug treatment. WCH was defined by an average daytime ABP < 131/86 mmHg in women and < 136/87 mmHg in men. Ambulatory hypertension was defined by higher ABP values. RESULTS: In the whole population, the clinic blood pressure, ABP and left ventricular mass did not change from baseline to the follow-up visit, whereas the peak A: peak E ratio (where A is the velocity of transmitral blood flow after atrial contraction and E is the velocity during passive left ventricle filling) increased from 0.86 to 0.93. Sixty-three per cent of subjects remained in the WCH category at follow-up study; the remaining 37% shifted to the ambulatory hypertension category. The former group showed no changes in clinic blood pressure, ABP, left ventricular mass and peak A: peak E ratio. The clinic blood pressure of those who developed ambulatory hypertension did not change, whereas their ABP and peak A: peak E ratio increased and their left ventricular mass increased slightly but not significantly. The left ventricular mass increased from baseline to follow-up study by 6.2% in those who developed ambulatory hypertension and decreased by 1.6% in those who remained in the WCH category. The changes in left ventricular mass were associated with the changes in average 24 h systolic blood pressure, but not with the changes in clinic blood pressure. In a stepwise logistic regression analysis, average daytime diastolic blood pressure was the sole variable to enter the model and the probability of ambulatory hypertension at follow-up study was 20.0%percnt; in those with basal daytime ABP <130/80 mmHg, versus 81% in those with higher basal daytime blood pressure levels. CONCLUSION: After 0.5-6.5 years, WCH spontaneously evolved into ambulatory hypertension in 37% of subjects, with an accompanying rise in left ventricular mass. The probability of ambulatory hypertension increased with the baseline values of ABP, rather than with those of clinic blood pressure. WCH might be a prehypertensive state (particularly in subjects with higher baseline ABP levels) and should be defined by low levels of daytime ABP, possibly lower than 130/80 mmHg.     

White coat effect in treated and untreated patients with high office blood pressure. Relationship with pulse wave velocity and left ventricular mass index.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate in hypertensive patients whether the white coat effect is associated with target-organ damage and whether it is modified by anti-hypertensive therapy. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study we evaluated blood pressure (BP) measured in the office and by 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) as an index of aortic stiffness, and left ventricular mass index (LVMI) in 88 subjects (aged 49 +/- 2 years) with white-coat hypertension (WCH, office BP > 140/90, daytime BP < 130/84 mmHg), 31 under antihypertensive therapy, 57 untreated, and in 115 patients with office and ambulatory hypertension (HT, aged 51 +/- 2 years, office BP > 140/90, daytime BP > 135/85), 65 under antihypertensive therapy, 50 untreated. In a longitudinal study in 15 patients with HT and in 11 patients with WCH we evaluated the influence of antihypertensive therapy (> 6 months) on office and ambulatory BP and on PWV. RESULTS: The intensity of the white coat effect (office BP-daytime BP) was greater in WCH than in HT. Taking all subjects, the white coat effect did not correlate with PWV (r = 0.08, ns) or with LVMI (r = 0.01, ns), whereas daytime BP correlated significantly with PWV (r = 0.41, p < 0.01) and with LVMI (r = 0.32, p < 0.05). WCH subjects showed lower PWV and LVMI than HT subjects. Treated and untreated WCH, with similar office and daytime BP, showed similar values of PWV and LVMI. Treated and untreated HT showed similar office BP values but treated HT showed lower daytime BP and PWV values. In the longitudinal study, antihypertensive therapy significantly reduced daytime BP and PWV values in the 15 HTs, whereas in the 11 WCH it did not alter daytime BP or PWV values. CONCLUSIONS: 1. In both WCH and HT (treated and untreated) the intensity of the white coat effect does not reflect either the severity of hypertension measured by target organ damage or the efficacy of antihypertensive treatment. 2. In WCH antihypertensive therapy does not improve either ambulatory BP values or damage to target organs.     

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in nonagenarians

The objective of the study is to investigate ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in a sample of Spanish nonagenarians. We also analyzed the misdiagnosis of hypertension and investigated blood pressure (BP) control in treated hypertensive nonagenarians. Twenty-four-hour ABPM was undertaken in a group of 42 nonagenarians. The 24-h mean, daytime BP, nighttime BP and heart rate (HR) were extracted from the ABPM. Sociodemographic data, the ability to perform basic daily activities, measured by the Barthel index (BI) or instrumental activities revealed by the Lawton and Brody index (LI), cognition, and comorbidity were evaluated. Thirty-one subjects were receiving antihypertensive drug treatment. Twenty-four hour, daytime and sleeping pressures averaged 130/65, 131/68 and 128/63mmHg, respectively. Seventeen (40.5%) of the 42 patients had a daytime BP of 135/85 or higher. In terms of the BP pattern, 8 (19%) subjects were dippers, 19 (45%) non-dippers, and 15 (36%) were risers. Five (45.46%) out of 11 patients with no evidence of hypertension (normotensive patients) had a daytime BP of 135/85 or higher. The mean daytime BP was 135/85 or higher in 12 (38.7%) out of 31 nonagenarians who had previously received therapy for hypertension. In, conclusion a high prevalence of hypertension, misdiagnosis and inadequate BP control was found in nonagenarians treated for hypertension.     

Isolated ambulatory hypertension is common in outpatients referred to a hypertension centre

The present investigation was aimed at determining the prevalence and the blood pressure (BP) profile of isolated ambulatory hypertension, defined as an elevated ambulatory BP with normal office blood pressure, in a series of 1488 consecutive outpatients referred for routine clinical evaluation of suspected or established arterial hypertension. All patients underwent both office BP (OBP) measurement by a physician and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). Using OBP values (cutoff for diagnosis of hypertension >/=140/90 mmHg) and daytime ABPM (cutoff for diagnosis of hypertension >/=135/85 mmHg), patients were classified into eight subgroups. In the whole series we found that, independent of treatment status, the prevalence of isolated ambulatory hypertension exceeded 10%. More importantly, 45.3% of individuals who presented with normal OBP values, showed elevated BP at ABPM. Night-time BP, 24-h pulse pressure, and BP variability were significantly higher in isolated ambulatory hypertensives than in normotensive or in white-coat hypertensive individuals. Therefore, isolated ambulatory hypertension is characterized by a blood pressure profile that is similar to that observed in sustained hypertension. These findings suggest that isolated ambulatory hypertension is very common and probably the indications for ABPM should be more extensive in outpatients referred to hypertensive centre.     

Independent predictors of isolated clinic ('white-coat') hypertension

BACKGROUND: Hypertension guidelines recommend 24 h ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) monitoring in hypertensive subjects with suspected isolated clinic hypertension (ICH). However, the pre-test probability of ICH based on the distribution of its independent predictors has not yet been estimated in hypertensive subjects with mildly elevated blood pressure. OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the independent predictors of ICH in mildly hypertensive subjects. METHODS: In the setting of the HARVEST-PIUMA collaboration, we studied 1564 subjects with hypertension stage I. At entry, all subjects were untreated and all underwent ABP monitoring and echocardiography. Diabetes, hypertension grade > I, renal failure or previous cardiovascular morbid events were exclusion criteria. Clinic BP was 143/92 mmHg (SD 9/5) and 24 h ABP was 128/81 mmHg (SD 10/8). RESULTS: Prevalence of ICH (daytime ABP < 130 mmHg systolic and 80 mmHg diastolic) was 10.4%. In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, sex (P = 0.002), smoking (P = 0.038) and clinic diastolic BP (P = 0.0002) were the sole independent predictors of ICH according to the following equation: Y = 2.6438 + 0.5128 x sex (0 = men; 1 = women) + 0.4543 x current smoking (0 = yes; 1 = no) - 0.0531 x clinic diastolic BP (mmHg) and P (probability of ICH) = exp(Y)/[1 + (exp(Y)]. Left ventricular (LV) mass at echocardiography was a further independent predictor (P = 0.002) of ICH according to the following equation: Y= 3.4343 + 0.4603 x sex + 0.5989 x current smoking - 0.0482 x clinic diastolic BP - 0.0312 x LV mass [g/height (m)2.7]. LV mass was greater (P < 0.01) in the group with ambulatory hypertension [42.3 g/height (m)2.7] than in that with ICH [39.2 g/height (m)2.7] and not dissimilar between the ICH group and a control group of 370 healthy normotensive subjects [38.1 g/height (m)2.7]. CONCLUSIONS: In untreated subjects with stage I hypertension, ICH is most frequent among women, nonsmokers and subjects with low clinic BP and smaller LV mass. These findings allow identification of subjects with indication to ABP monitoring because of suspected ICH.     

Ambulatory blood pressure in the young adult with hypertension history during childhood]

The tendency of subjects to maintain their relative position within the distribution of blood pressure (BP) has been defined as "tracking". Regarding this phenomenon, the purpose of the study was to evaluate the interest of ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) in the assessment of arterial hypertension in young adults (YA) with childhood hypertension history (CHH). 52 subjects, 20.1 +/- 2.4 years old, 26 men, 26 women issued from a cohort of 150 children with high BP levels (greater than 97.5 th percentile) during their infancy (school check-up), were included in the study. An ABPM was performed with space-labs system 90202 from 8 a.m. to 6 p.m., measurements every 15 minutes (37.6 +/- 7.4 readings). Left ventricular mass index (LVMI) was determined with echocardiography, (Penn convention). Office BP, measured with mercury apparatus in lying and standing position, was respectively, 131.0 +/- 14.6/81.9 +/- 9.7 and 130.1 +/- 14/86.6 +/- 9.9. According to JNC 1988, this casual BP identified 40 normotensives (NT), 9 borderlines (BL) and 5 hypertensives (HT); 10 of them had a "high normal" diastolic BP (85-90 mmHg) ABP recordings of the study group were compared to day-time reference values of NT. Three subgroups are individualized: G1 NT, G2 HT, G3 BL. [table; see text] *p: less than 0.001; p: less than 0.01. Wall thickness (WTh) and LVMI were significantly higher in hypertensives (G2 + G3) than in normotensives (G1): [table; see text] There was a significant correlation between LVMI and mean systolic ABP (p less than 0.01: r = 0.44), but not with office SBP.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Characteristics of white coat hypertension in Chinese Han patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Objectives: This study documented the prevalence and clinical features of white coat hypertension (WCH) among Chinese Han patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T₂DM). Methods: Clinic and ambulatory blood pressure (BP) measurements were compared in 856 patients with T₂DM to determine the frequency of WCH (WCH was defined as clinical blood pressure ≥140/90?mmHg and daytime blood pressure <135/85?mmHg and/or 24-h ambulatory BP (ABP) mean value of <130/80?mmHg on ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). Weight, waist circumference (WC), body mass index (BMI), waist to height ratio (WHtR), fasting blood glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin level and circadian BP patterns were also measured to find clinical features predictive of WCH in T₂DM. Results: The prevalence of WCH was 7.36% (63/856) in the overall population, 6.13% (29/473) in male and 8.88% (34/383) in female (p?2DM, male WC were independent protective factors, whereas female sex, smoking and alcohol consumption were independent risk factors for WCH in T₂DM. Non-dippers and reverse dippers made up larger proportion of the WCH group (p?Conclusion: WCH is relatively common among T₂DM patients, it is a unique condition distinct from essential hypertension (EH), and WCH patients also exhibit significant differences in clinical parameters.     

Left ventricular hypertrophy in treated hypertensive patients with good blood pressure control outside the clinic,but poor clinic blood pressure control

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in treated patients with good blood pressure (BP) control during multiple home BP (HBP) measurements and during 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), but with unsatisfactory BP control in the clinic. These patients were compared with treated hypertensives whose BP was well controlled under the three circumstances. METHODS: Seventy-two treated consecutive patients (group I, age 56 +/- 10 years) with clinic BP values > or = 140/90 mmHg, and a difference between clinic and self-measured HBP > 10 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and/or > 20 mmHg for systolic blood pressure (SBP), underwent the following procedures: (1) clinic BP measurement; (2) routine diagnostic work-up; (3) HBP monitoring; (4) 24-h ABPM; (5) echocardiography. Thirty-five hypertensive patients with satisfactory BP control according to clinic (< 140/90 mmHg), HBP (< or = 131/82 mmHg) and ABP criteria (< or = 125/79 mmHg) were included as the control group (group II, age 55 +/- 9 years). RESULTS: In group I, 33 subjects out of the 72 (46%) with clinic BP > 140/90 mmHg had BP values controlled outside the clinic (23 according to HBP criteria and 22 according to ABP criteria). The prevalence of LVH (LV mass index > 134 g/m2 in men and > 110 g/m2 in women) was significantly higher in these patients (15.1 versus 2.8%, P < 0.01) than in group II (BP also controlled in the clinic), despite the fact that HBP and ABP were reduced to similar levels in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS Our data provide evidence that treated hypertensive patients with good BP control at home or during ambulatory monitoring, but incomplete BP control in the clinic, have more pronounced cardiac alterations than patients with both clinic and out of the clinic BP control. This finding offers a new piece of information about the diagnostic value of BP measurement in the clinic to assess BP control during antihypertensive treatment.     

Sequential follow-up clinic and ambulatory blood pressure evaluation in a low risk population of white-coat hypertensive patients and in normotensives

BACKGROUND: In subjects with white-coat hypertension (WCH) it is unclear how ambulatory blood pressure (ABPM) progresses over time and whether they exhibit an increased cardiovascular risk. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated the transition of clinic and ABPM values in 39 clinic and ABPM normotensive subjects (NT) (clinic BP<140/90 mmHg and awake BP<130/85 mmHg, ages 43.4+/-2.6 y) and in 79 untreated subjects (47.2+/-2.4 y) with WCH (clinic BP>140/90, awake ABP<130/85 mmHg) with no other major cardiovascular risk factors. Ambulatory blood pressure was evaluated at baseline and on at least two further occasions during follow-up. RESULTS: At baseline all subjects were untreated and groups did not differ on values of metabolic parameters, BMI, left ventricular mass index, and ABPM values. Subjects were revaluated for ABPM half way through and at the end of follow-up, 35+/-3 and 86+/-4 months in NT and 49+/-4 and 90+/-4 months in WCH. Thirty-six WCH were on antihypertensive treatment (AH) after baseline until the end of follow-up (WCH-tr), whereas 43 WCH (WCH-untr) were free from AH throughout the study. In a similar way all groups showed a significant (p<0.01) progressive increase in 24-h ABPM systolic blood pressure (SBP)/diastolic blood pressure (DBP) from baseline throughout the follow-up in NT (+4.9/2.1+/-0.8/0.9 mmHg), average annual increase of 0.72/0.37 mmHg/y, in WCH-tr (+ 5.0/1.2+/-1.1/1.5 mmHg), average annual increase of 0.66/0.31 mmHg/y and in WCH-untr (+5.4/3.2+/-0.9/1.1 mmHg), average annual increase of 0.74/0.39 mmHg/y. During the follow-up office SBP/DBP (mmHg) significantly rose in NT (+5.7/3.9) but was reduced in WCH-tr (-7.8/5.2) and in WCH-untr (-4.7/1.1). Development of ambulatory hypertension (daytime BP >130 and/or >85 mmHg) occurred in 15.4% (6/39) of NT, in 22.7% (8/36) of WCH-tr and in 26.1% (11/43) of WCH-untr (NS). First cardiovascular events recorded were three in subjects with WCH and none in NT. CONCLUSIONS: After 7.4 years of follow-up, both the progressive increase in ABPM and the rate of transition to ambulatory hypertension in subjects with WCH (either treated or untreated), who were selected under strict criteria were similar to that of normotensive subjects. Also there was no evidence that WCH exhibited a clear higher risk of development cardiovascular events.     

Relationship between joint national committee-VI classification of hypertension and ambulatory blood pressure in patients with hypertension diagnosed by casual blood pressure

Background: White-coat hypertension has been diagnosed arbitrarily based on different criteria. In 1997, the Joint National Committee-VI (JNC-VI) reported a new classification of hypertension and strongly emphasized the importance of ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) monitoring. The report pronounced normal ABP values for the first time. Hypothesis: The study's aim was to clarify the relationship between casual blood pressure (BP) and ABP of patients with essential hypertension in each stage of JNC-VI classification, and the prevalence of white-coat hypertension diagnosed by using JNC-VI normal ABP criteria. Methods: Ambulatory blood pressure was monitored noninvasively in 232 patients with essential hypertension whose casual BP was ≥ 140/90 mmHg. The patients were classified according to JNC-VI classification, and their casual BP was compared with ABP. The criterion of white-coat hypertension was defined as casual BP ≥ 140/90 mmHg with normal ABP according to JNC-VI criteria (< 135/85 during daytime and < 120/75 during nighttime). Results: Mean ABP increased as the stage advanced, and the differences between casual BP and ABP also increased. There were considerable overlaps in the distribution of ABP among stages. The prevalence of white-coat hypertension was 13% overall: 30% of the patients with isolated systolic hypertension, 19% of those in stage 1,10% in stage 2, and 4% in stage 3. Conclusions: Classification of hypertension based on casual BP may not always correspond in severity to that based on ABP. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring recommended by JNC-VI is very useful for the evaluation of hypertension to differentiate white-coat hypertension from true hypertension.     

Lack of adequate blood pressure control in the morning and evening periods in medicated hypertensive patients considered to be controlled in the office.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: In hypertensive patients tight blood pressure (BP) control during the critical morning and evening periods may be relevant for preventing cardiovascular events, which most frequently occur at these times of the day. METHODS: In a prospective study we evaluated 24h ambulatory BP (ABP) values (24h, daytime, nighttime, morning period between 6-10 am and evening period between 6-10 pm), in 103 hypertensive patients (HTs), aged between 18-79 years, considered to be controlled in the office in the previous two months (office BP < 140/90 mmHg, 2 x 3 readings, before taking medication), who were being treated with antihypertensive drugs taken once daily in the morning. Based on ABP data, HTs were considered to have good BP control if daytime BP values were < 135/85 mmHg, < 133.1/85.4 mmHg during the morning period, and < 138.1/89.3 mmHg during the evening period. Otherwise control of ABP was considered poor. These limits correspond to the upper 95% confidence limits of BP calculated for each period in a normotensive control population of 210 subjects age-matched to the HTs. RESULTS: Of the 103 HTs, 39 were under monotherapy and the remaining 64 on combination regimens (34 with two drugs, 29 with three and one with four). Based on ABP data of the 103 HTs, poor ABP control was observed in 36 (35%) in the morning period, in 24 (23%) in the evening period and in 29 (28%) for daytime BP values. ABP values during both the morning and evening periods correlated significantly with daytime values (r = 0.72 and r = 0.89 respectively, p < 0.01) but not with office values. CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of treated HTs who are considered to be controlled in the office present abnormally high ABP levels, particularly in the critical early morning period, but also during the evening and throughout the daytime period.     

Significance of white-coat hypertension in older persons with isolated systolic hypertension: a meta-analysis using the International Database on Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in Relation to Cardiovascular Outcomes population

The significance of white-coat hypertension in older persons with isolated systolic hypertension remains poorly understood. We analyzed subjects from the population-based 11-country International Database on Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in Relation to Cardiovascular Outcomes database who had daytime ambulatory blood pressure (BP; ABP) and conventional BP (CBP) measurements. After excluding persons with diastolic hypertension by CBP (≥90 mm Hg) or by daytime ABP (≥85 mm Hg), a history of cardiovascular disease, and persons <18 years of age, the present analysis totaled 7295 persons, of whom 1593 had isolated systolic hypertension. During a median follow-up of 10.6 years, there was a total of 655 fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events. The analyses were stratified by treatment status. In untreated subjects, those with white-coat hypertension (CBP ≥140/<90 mm Hg and ABP <135/<85 mm Hg) and subjects with normal BP (CBP <140/<90 mm Hg and ABP <135/<85 mm Hg) were at similar risk (adjusted hazard rate: 1.17 [95% CI: 0.87-1.57]; P=0.29). Furthermore, in treated subjects with isolated systolic hypertension, the cardiovascular risk was similar in elevated conventional and normal daytime systolic BP as compared with those with normal conventional and normal daytime BPs (adjusted hazard rate: 1.10 [95% CI: 0.79-1.53]; P=0.57). However, both treated isolated systolic hypertension subjects with white-coat hypertension (adjusted hazard rate: 2.00; [95% CI: 1.43-2.79]; P<0.0001) and treated subjects with normal BP (adjusted hazard rate: 1.98 [95% CI: 1.49-2.62]; P<0.0001) were at higher risk as compared with untreated normotensive subjects. In conclusion, subjects with sustained hypertension who have their ABP normalized on antihypertensive therapy but with residual white-coat effect by CBP measurement have an entity that we have termed, "treated normalized hypertension." Therefore, one should be cautious in applying the term "white-coat hypertension" to persons receiving antihypertensive treatment.     

'Reverse white-coat hypertension' in older hypertensives

OBJECTIVES: The role of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in the elderly is unclear. This study has examined differences between clinic and ambulatory blood pressure (BP) in a large cohort of older hypertensives, with particular respect to the factors influencing the direction and magnitude of this difference. DESIGN: The Second Australian National Blood Pressure Study (ANBP2) is a general practice-based randomized-outcome trial in 6083 older hypertensives treated with an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or diuretic-based regimen. Before starting treatment a subset of 713 patients (age range 65-83 years) had a 'successful' 26-hour ambulatory blood pressure recording with a SpaceLabs 90207 recorder. RESULTS: Average clinic BP (+/- SD) was 167 +/- 12/90 +/- 8 mmHg. Average daytime ambulatory BP was 157 +/- 15*/89 +/- 10* mmHg and night ambulatory BP was 137 +/- 16+/74 +/- 10+ mmHg (different from clinic BP: *P < 0.01;from daytime ambulatory BP: +P < 0.001). Twenty-one to 45% of all patients had higher daytime systolic or diastolic ambulatory BP than clinic readings, with smoking, previous treatment for hypertension and lower clinic BP being the main predictors of this 'reverse white-coat effect'. CONCLUSIONS: Although mean daytime ambulatory blood pressures were lower than clinic readings in this large cohort of untreated older hypertensives, a substantial proportion showed the reverse of the so-called 'white-coat effect'. These findings identify the important role for ABPM in the elderly, not only for avoiding overtreatment in those with typical 'white-coat hypertension' but also for ensuring adequate treatment is given to those with the reverse of this phenomenon.     

Isolated ambulatory hypertension and changes in target organ damage in treated hypertensive patients

Isolated ambulatory hypertension is a condition characterized by elevated ambulatory but normal clinic blood pressure (BP), and has been reported to be associated with increased cardiovascular risk in untreated subjects. However, little is known about the relationship between this condition and intermediate end points such as target organ damage (TOD) in treated hypertensives. We investigated the impact of isolated ambulatory hypertension on left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and microalbuminuria (MA) in a selected sample of treated nondiabetic hypertensives with effective and prolonged clinic BP control (BP<140/90 mmHg). Clinic BP measurements, routine diagnostic procedures, echocardiography and 24-h urine collection for MA, were undertaken in 80 patients (mean age 53+/-8 years) with essential hypertension attending our hospital outpatient centre at baseline and after an average follow-up of 30 months. At follow-up evaluation BP status was assessed by self-measurement of BP and ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). At the follow-up visit, 51 out of 80 patients (63.7%) reached a BP control according to ABP (average daytime BP<132/85 mmHg) criteria (group I) whereas the remaining 29 did not (group II); home BP was controlled (BP<135/85 mmHg) in all members of group I and in 86% of group II. In the overall study population, mean Sokolow voltage, LV mass index (LVMI) and urinary albumin excretion (UAE) decreased compared to baseline from 24.1+/-5.0 to 18.9+/-5.1 mm (P<0.05), 115.6+/-24.1 to 97.7+/-21.6 g/m(2) (P<0.01), 11.8+/-23.7 to 5.8+/-14.9 mg/24 h (P<0.05), respectively. The prevalence of ECG LVH, altered LV patterns and MA fell from 7.5 to 2.5% (P=NS), from 45 to 25 (P<0.01) and from 13.7 to 5.1% (P<0.05), respectively. However, when data were analysed separately for the two groups a significant decrease of echo LVH and MA was found only in patients with controlled ABP. LVMI and MA decreased from 117.1+/-23.1 to 95.9+/-22.1 g/m(2) (P<0.01) and 12.8+/-24.7 to 4.1+/-5.7 mg/24 h (P<0.05) in group I, and from 114.1+/-24.8 to 102.3+/-20.3 (P=NS) and 11.9+/-22.1 to 6.3+/-18.1 mg/24 h (P=NS) in group II. In conclusion, in the present study isolated ambulatory hypertension in treated patients is associated with a lack of regression in cardiac and extracardiac TOD, suggesting that a tight BP control throughout the 24 h plays a key role in lowering hypertension-induced structural and functional alterations at cardiac and renal level.     

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: is it necessary for the routine assessment of hypertension in people with diabetes?

AIMS: The British Hypertension Society (BHS) has recommended that, for people with diabetes, the target 'clinic' blood pressure should be < 140/80 mmHg. Ambulatory monitoring of blood pressure (ABPM) is used widely in the assessment of hypertension and the BHS has recommended that the target 'awake' ambulatory blood pressure for people with diabetes should be < 130/75 mmHg. The purpose of the present study was to determine the utility of ABPM in the assessment of hypertension in patients with diabetes, over and above a careful 'clinic' measurement of blood pressure. METHODS: The records of 540 patients with diabetes who underwent ABPM (using SpaceLabs monitors) were retrospectively analysed. With respect to current BHS recommendations, the positive and negative predictive values of 'clinic' blood pressure (measured by trained nurses using mercury sphygmomanometers) on 'awake' ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) were calculated. RESULTS: The positive predictive value of the 'clinic' BP, its ability to detect patients whose ABP was above BHS targets, was 99%. The negative predictive value of 'clinic' blood pressure was 27%. CONCLUSIONS: With regard to current BHS guidelines, ABPM is generally unnecessary in the assessment of hypertension in patients with diabetes, provided careful 'clinic' measurements of blood pressure are made.     

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and risk of cardiovascular disease: a population based study

BACKGROUND: Information on the relationship between ambulatory blood pressure (BP) and cardiovascular disease in the general population is sparse. METHODS: Prospective study of a random sample of 1700 Danish men and women, aged 41 to 72 years, without major cardiovascular diseases. At baseline, ambulatory BP, office BP, and other risk factors were recorded. The end point was a combined end point consisting of cardiovascular mortality, ischemic heart disease, and stroke. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 9.5 years, 156 end points were recorded. In multivariate models, the relative risk (95% confidence interval) associated with increments of 10/5 mmHg of systolic/diastolic ambulatory BP were 1.35 (1.21-1.50) and 1.27 (1.16-1.39). The corresponding figures for office BP were 1.18 (1.09-1.29) and 1.11 (1.03-1.19). Compared with normotension (office BP <140/90 mm Hg; daytime BP <135/85 mm Hg) the relative risks associated with isolated office hypertension (office BP >/=140/90 mm Hg; daytime BP <135/85 mm Hg), isolated ambulatory hypertension (office BP <140/90 mm Hg; daytime BP >/=135/85 mm Hg), and sustained hypertension (office BP >/=140/90 mm Hg; daytime BP >/=135/85 mm Hg) were 0.66 (0.30-1.44), 1.52 (0.91-2.54), and 2.10 (1.45-3.06), respectively. A blunted BP decrease at night was a risk factor (P = .02) in subjects with daytime ambulatory hypertension, but not in subjects with daytime ambulatory normotension (P = .13). CONCLUSIONS: Ambulatory BP provided prognostic information about cardiovascular disease better than office BP. Isolated office hypertension was not a risk factor and isolated ambulatory hypertension tended to be associated with increased risk. A blunted BP decrease at night was a risk factor in subjects with daytime ambulatory hypertension.     

White coat effect and white coat hypertension in community pharmacy practice

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to investigate whether a white coat effect (WCE) can be observed and quantified in community pharmacy practice. METHODS: In five community pharmacies of Basel, Switzerland, clients asking for blood pressure (BP) measurement were recruited to participate in a free of charge study. Blood pressure was measured in four different settings: pharmacy (using mercury sphygmomanometers), outpatient clinic (measurement by a nurse using mercury sphygmomanometers), self-measurement at home (using automated wrist devices) and daytime ambulatory BP (ABP) monitoring (using SpaceLabs 90207 monitors). WCE was defined as the difference between pharmacy or outpatient and daytime ABP. RESULTS: A total of 50 subjects completed all measurements (42% male, mean age 53.7 years+/-14.0). Blood pressure values of the different settings: (means in mmHg+/-SD, systolic; diastolic): pharmacy BP 129+/-19; 82+/-10, outpatient clinic BP 127+/-15; 82+/-10, home BP 119+/-15; 73+/-9, daytime ABP 124+/-10; 79+/-8. Pharmacy BP was significantly higher (P=0.03 systolic; P=0.02 diastolic) compared with daytime ABP and differences among subjects with antihypertensive medication (n=22) were even more significant (P<0.01). Individual differences were found between pharmacy BP and daytime ABP: +4.6+/-14.8; +2.9+/-8.3. Outpatient BP was significantly higher compared with daytime ABP in diastolic (P=0.04) but not in systolic values. Individual differences between outpatient BP and daytime ABP were +2.5+/-13.1; +2.8+/-9.2. 'Clinically important WCE' (>or=20 mmHg systolic or >or=10 mmHg diastolic) was observed in 24% of all subjects in the pharmacy and in 20% in the outpatient clinic. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that WCE and white coat hypertension exist in community pharmacy practice and are similar to the effects in an outpatient clinic.     

Impact of prehypertension on carotid artery intima–media thickening: Actual or masked?

BackgroundRecent studies have reported that prehypertension is associated with increased values of common carotid artery intima–media thickness (CCA-IMT). The aim of this study was to assess the impact of daytime ambulatory blood pressure (BP) levels on the association of prehypertension with CCA intima–media thickening in prehypertensive subjects.MethodsA total of 807 subjects with office systolic BP < 140 and diastolic BP < 90 mmHg, underwent 24 h ambulatory BP (ABP) monitoring and carotid artery ultrasonographic measurements. The study population was divided into 3 groups according to office and daytime ABP levels: (1) normotensives: subjects with office BP < 120/80 mmHg and daytime ambulatory BP values within the normal range, (2) actual prehypertensives: individuals with office SBP (120–139 mmHg) and/or DBP (80–89 mmHg) and daytime ambulatory BP values within the normal range and (3) prehypertensives with masked hypertension (MH): patients with office SBP (120–139 mmHg) and/or DBP (80–89 mmHg) and elevated daytime ambulatory BP values.ResultsPrehypertensive patients with MH had higher (p < 0.01) CCA-IMT values (0.712 mm; 95%CI: 0.698–0.725) than actual prehypertensives (0.649 mm; 95%CI: 0.641–0.656) and normotensives (0.655 mm; 95%CI: 0.641–0.670) even after adjustment for baseline characteristics. Normotensives and actual prehypertensives did not differ significantly regarding CCA-IMT values (p > 0.05). After adjusting for potential confounders, (including demographic characteristics, vascular risk factors, and office BP) prehypertension with MH was independently (p < 0.01) associated with a 0.06 mm increment in CCA-IMT (95%CI: 0.03–0.09).ConclusionsPatients with office BP levels in the prehypertensive range, who also have elevated daytime ABP levels, had higher CCA-IMT values than patients with prehypertension with normal daytime ABP values and normotensive individuals.