Somatosensory evoked potentials after removal of somatosensory cortex in man

Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) to median nerve, ulnar nerve, thumb, middle finger, and posterior tibial nerve stimulation were recorded in a patient with a discrete resection of part of the postcentral somatosensory cortex as a treatment for focal epilepsy. Comparison of the different stimulation sites confirmed electrophysiologically the restricted locus of the lesion. The results strongly suggest that the early negative component (N20) and subsequent components recorded postcentrally are of cortical origin and depend upon postcentral gyrus cytoarchitectonic areas 3, 2, and 1. Moreover, these postcentral SEPs are distinct from precentrally recorded activity.     

Unusual pattern of somatosensory and brain-stem auditory evoked potentials after cardio-respiratory arrest

Two patients in coma after cardio-pulmonary arrest showed bilateral absence of all brain-stem auditory evoked potentials contrasting with normal brain-stem reflexes and normal somatosensory cortical evoked potentials. In both patients pre-existing dysfunction of peripheral auditory structures could be ruled out. Subsequent neuropathological analysis showed that the anoxic-ischaemic lesions were restricted to Sommer's sector and the Purkinje cells. These unusual data suggest the hypothesis that a severe hypoxic-ischaemic insult may impair cochlear function and interfere with the activation of the intact auditory pathways.     

Motor and somatosensory evoked potentials recorded from the rat

An accurate neurophysiological technique that is able to monitor both the sensory and motor tracts of the spinal cord is required to assess patients with injury or other lesions of the cord, and for the evaluation of experimental studies of cord injury. We have recorded and characterized the motor and somatosensory evoked potentials (MEPs and SSEPs) from 20 normal rats and from 16 rats with cord lesions. MEPs were elicited by applying constant current anodal stimuli to the sensorimotor cortex (SMC) with the responses recorded from microelectrodes in the spinal cord at T10 (MEP-C) and from a bipolar electrode placed on the contralateral sciatic nerve (MEP-N). SSEPs were elicited by stimulating the sciatic nerve and were recorded from the cord at T10 and the contralateral SMC. The MEP-C consisted of an initial D wave (mean latency 1.21 +/- 0.12 msec and 4 subsequent I waves, 11-14). The D wave was elicited at stimulation frequencies exceeding 100 Hz. The initial positive wave of the MEP-N (mean latency 3.09 +/- 0.19 msec) was followed by several slower components which were attenuated by repetition rates exceeding 8.2 Hz. The grand mean SSEP consisted of 7 peaks. Sectioning of the dorsal columns abolished the SSEP but spared the MEP. Complete cord transection abolished both the MEP and SSEP. These experiments demonstrate that the combined recording of MEPs and SSEPs is an accurate and easily performed method of monitoring the functional integrity of the rat cord, and suggest that this technique would be of value in patients, especially those undergoing operative treatment of spinal lesions.     

Characterization and processing of surface recorded spinal somatosensory evoked potentials

Somatosensory evoked potentials were recorded from the skin surface overlying the spinal cord, from the lower lumbar to the lower cervical regions. The recorded responses did not vary over time in any one individual and at each level a consistent wave shape was obtained across all individuals tested. Since the initial signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for the evoked response recorded at any cord level is very low, the signal data must be processed. In this study, bandpass filtering or matched filtering was used together with ensemble averaging to obtain a usable signal in a reasonable processing time. SNR was improved approximately 1.5 X with bandpass filtering and 2 X with matched filtering. Although the output of the matched filter is a distorted version of the input signal, detection of information is enhanced and processing time using the matched filter and ensemble averaging can be reduced to 1/4 that required for ensemble averaging alone.     

The relationship between human long-latency somatosensory evoked potentials recorded from the cortical surface and from the scalp.

In scalp recordings, stimulation of the median nerve evokes a number of long-latency (40-300 msec) somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) whose neural origins are unknown. We attempted to infer the generators of these potentials by comparing them with SEPs recorded from the cortical surface or from within the brain. SEPs recorded from contralateral sensorimotor cortex can be characterized as "precentral," "postcentral," or "pericentral." The scalp-recorded P45, N60 and P100 potentials appear to correspond to the pericentral P50, N90 and P190 potentials and are probably generated mainly in contralateral area 1 of somatosensory cortex. The scalp-recorded N70-P70 appear to correspond to the precentral and postcentral N80-P80 and are generated mainly in contralateral area 3b of somatosensory cortex. The scalp-recorded N120-P120 appear to correspond to the intracranial N100-P100 and are probably generated bilaterally in the second somatosensory areas. N140 and P190 (the "vertex potentials") are probably generated bilaterally in the frontal lobes, including orbito-frontal, lateral and mesial (supplementary motor area) cortex. The supplementary sensory area probably generates long-latency SEPs, but preliminary recordings have yet to confirm this assumption. Most of the proposed correspondences are speculative because the different conditions under which scalp and intracranial recordings are obtained make comparison difficult. Human recordings using chronically implanted cortical surface electrodes, and monkey studies of SEPs which appear to be analogs of the human potentials, should provide better answers regarding the precise generators of human long-latency SEPs.     

The scalp topography of human somatosensory and auditory evoked potentials.

The waveform and topography of components of the scalp recorded somatosensory evoked poal (AEP) to click stimulation of the right ear, were determined for scalp electrode locations of the 10-20 system and for locations at the eye, mastoids, and posterior neck. Twenty-one SEP and twenty-two AEP components were analyzed. Differentiation of neurogenic and myogenic components was attempted on the basis of localization and variability. Some components of extracranial origin, apparently originating in frontal musculature, were small in most experienced subjects and large in most experimentally naive subjects. These and other presumptive myogenic potentials can distort adjacent neurogenic components. These data should aid in predicting SEP and AEP characteristics and in assessing myogenic distortion of neurogenic components.     

Early nociceptive evoked potentials (NEPs) recorded from the scalp

ObjectiveNeurophysiological investigation of nociceptive pathway has so far been limited to late cortical responses. We sought to detect early components of the cortical evoked potentials possibly reflecting primary sensory activity.MethodsThe 150 IDE micropatterned electrode was used to selectively activate Aδ intraepidermic fibres of the right hand dorsum in 25 healthy subjects and 3 patients suffering from trigeminal neuralgia. Neurographic recordings were performed to assess type of stimulated fibres and check selectivity. Cortical evoked potentials were recorded from C3′-Fz and Cz-Au1.ResultsNeurographic recordings confirmed selective activation of Aδ fibres. Early components were detected after repetitive stimulation (0.83/s rate and 250–500 averages); the first negative component occured at 40 ms (N40) on the contralateral scalp.ConclusionsThe provided data support the hypothesis that N40 could be the cortical primary response conducted by fast Aδ fibres.SignificanceThis is the first report of early, possibly primary, cortical responses in humans by nociceptive peripheral stimulation. Although not perfected yet to allow widespread diagnostic use, this is probably the only method to allow fully objective evaluation of the nociceptive system, with important future implications in experimental and clinical neurophysiology.     

Somatosensory evoked potentials from the thalamic sensory relay nucleus (VPL) in humans: correlations with short latency somatosensory evoked potentials recorded at the scalp

Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) were recorded in humans from an electrode array which was implanted so that at least two electrodes were placed within the nucleus ventralis posterolateralis (VPL) of the thalamus and/or the medial lemniscus (ML) of the midbrain for therapeutic purposes. Several brief positive deflections (e.g., P11, P13, P14, P15, P16) followed by a slow negative component were recorded from the VPL. The sources of these components were differentiated on the basis of their latency, spatial gradient, and correlation with the sensory experience induced by the stimulation of each recording site. The results indicated that SEPs recorded from the VPL included activity volume-conducted from below the ML (P11), activity in ML fibers running through and terminating within the VPL (P13 and P14), activity in thalamocortical radiations originating in and running through the VPL (P15, P16 and following positive components) and postsynaptic local activity (the negative component). The sources of the scalp-recorded SEPs were also analyzed on the basis of the timing and spatial gradients of these components. The results suggested that the scalp P11 was a potential volume-conducted from below the ML, the scalp P13 and P14 were potentials reflecting the activity of ML fibers, the small notches on the ascending slope on N16 may potentially reflect the activity of thalamocortical radiations, and N16 may reflect the sum of local postsynaptic activity occurring in broad areas of the brain-stem and thalamus.     

Scalp recorded P13 and spinal recorded N13 in short latency somatosensory evoked potentials

Using non-cephalic reference and by median nerve stimulation, P 13 component and N 13 component are recorded on the scalp (scalp P 13) and the posterior neck (spinal N 13), respectively, in the short latency somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP). The purpose of this study is to disclose the origin, characteristics and clinical significance of these two components. Ten healthy volunteers served for normal subjects. Ten patients with pontine lesion or brain death were studied. The effect of barbiturate was also studied in additional 5 patients during anesthesia for cranioplastic surgeries. Electrical stimuli of 0.2 msec square wave pulse were used in routine examination. To confirm the effects of stimulation frequency, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24 and 27 Hz were also used in normal subjects. Recording electrodes were placed in the following sites. (1) Scalp electrode at the Shagass' point contralateral to the stimulated side (Par.). (2) Posterior neck electrode on the spinous process of the fifth cervical vertebrae (Cv5), (3) Anterior neck electrode on the thyroidal cartilage (Ant. C). (4) Erb's electrode just above the mid-clavicular point ipsilateral to the stimulation. Erb's electrode contra-lateral side of stimulation was used as a reference. Spinal N 13 on posterior neck reversed its polarity into P 13 (spinal P 13) on the anterior cervical electrode. A study with different stimulus rates revealed that the latency of scalp P 13 significantly prolonged at 24 Hz stimulation. On the other hand, the latency of spinal N 13-P 13 easily prolonged even at 18 Hz. This suggested that spinal N 13-P 13 were generated polysynaptically.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Long-latency somatosensory evoked potentials

Theoretically, long-latency somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) provide information on the function of somatosensory associative cortical structures. Their potential role in clinical studies and research has been hampered by the lack of standardized methodology in the use of these SEPs. Other factors, such as drugs, simultaneous stimuli, and state of consciousness, also have far-reaching influences on the various parameters of long-latency SEPs. The knowledge of the origin of most SEP components is at best fragmentary; studies on clinical-electrophysiological correlations seem to be hopeful in this respect. As yet, clinical applications of long-latency SEPs are limited; for future research, studies of disturbances of SEPs are most promising, mainly with regard to diseases of the gray matter, the influence of drugs on the cerebral function, and psychopathology.     

Low and high-frequency somatosensory evoked potentials recorded from the human pedunculopontine nucleus

ObjectiveTo investigate the generators of the somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) components recorded from the Pedunculopontine Tegmental nucleus (PPTg).MethodsTwenty-two patients, suffering from Parkinson’s disease (PD), underwent electrode implantation in the PPTg area for deep brain stimulation (DBS). SEPs were recorded from the DBS electrode contacts to median nerve stimulation.ResultsSEPs recorded from the PPTg electrode contacts could be classified in 3 types, according to their waveforms. (1) The biphasic potential showed a positive peak (P16) whose latency (16.05 ± 0.61 ms) shifted of 0.18 ± 0.07 ms from the lower to the upper contact of the electrode. (2) The triphasic potential showed an initial positive peak (P15) whose latency (15.4 ± 0.2 ms) did not change across the DBS electrode contacts. (3) In the last SEP configuration (mixed biphasic and triphasic waveform), the positive peak was bifid including both the P15 and P16 potentials.ConclusionWhile the P16 potential is probably generated by the somatosensory volley travelling along the medial lemniscus, the P15 response represents a far-field potential probably generated at the cuneate nucleus level.SignificanceOur results show the physiological meaning of the somatosensory responses recorded from the PPTg nucleus area.     

Scalp recorded somatosensory evoked potentials to posterior tibial nerve stimulation in humans

The somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) produced by stimulation of the right and left posterior tibial nerves individually and also by their simultaneous stimulation were recorded in 84 adult normal subjects up to 150 msec after the stimulus by electrodes placed on the cranial vertex and by rows of electrodes over the sagittal and coronal lines using references on the ear or in the nasopharynx. The statistical distribution of the latencies of their different peaks was established. The effect of simultaneous stimulation of right and left posterior tibial nerves on the early SEP components was described. Some details of the anatomy of the rolandic sulcus were inferred from the amplitude distribution of these potentials.     

Distribution of scalp somatosensory potentials evoked by stimulation of the tibial nerve in man

The scalp distribution of the response to stimulation of the tibial nerve at the medial malleolus was systematically analysed. The somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) was recorded with electrodes placed in a transversal line over the ipsilateral and contralateral postcentral gyri and in a sagittal line over the longitudinal brain fissure. The SEPs recorded over the ipsilateral hemisphere and along the sagittal line were similar to the F response (the response over the foot primary somatosensory region). Over the contralateral hemisphere the waveform of the responses changed obviously from point F to the point C (contralateral hand primary somatosensory region). The C response started with N37, P40 had a longer latency, N50 was not present and the subsequent waves were also considerably different. Mathematical simulation of the responses recorded from the electrodes between points F and C has shown that they represent an electrical algebraic summation of the activity over points F and C. Although the F and C responses may be 2 potentials arising from the opposite sides of a single dipole generator which is located in the medial fissure, it is more probable that the somatosensory evoked potential on tibial nerve stimulation reflects the activity of 2 separate generators.     

Three-dimensional human somatosensory evoked potentials

Median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials were recorded from 30 normal adults using conventional scalp derivations and an orthogonal bipolar surface electrode montage. This allowed the determination of the spatial orientation of the hypothetical centrally located equivalent dipole derived from the evoked response recorded in 3-dimensional voltage space. The 3-dimensional voltage trajectory describing changes in equivalent dipole orientation and magnitude revealed 4 major apices between 5 and 25 msec, 3 of which corresponded to the traditional P14, N20 and P25 peaks. A fourth apex at 17 msec was not as evident in the conventional recordings and signaled a transition from a vertical P14-N18 generator process to a horizontal N20 generator process. The normal within- and between-subject variability of trajectory apices, segments and planes are described, along with the theoretical and practical implications of this recording technique.     

Different contribution of joint and cutaneous inputs to early scalp somatosensory evoked potentials.

To elucidate whether the frontal components of scalp somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) depend on the type of peripheral input, we compared scalp SEPs in response to electrical stimuli applied to: (i) the proximal phalanx of the thumb, involving both deep and cutaneous afferents; and (ii) the distal phalanx of the thumb, involving cutaneous afferents, but excluding joint inputs coming from the interphalangeal articulation. We applied the same dipolar model that we built to explain the scalp SEP distribution to median nerve stimulation in previous investigations. Cortical SEPs after proximal stimulation were generated by three dipolar sources, one of which was likely to account for the frontal scalp N30. When we analyzed SEPs for distal (purely cutaneous) stimulation, the frontal and central recordings showed a clear reduction in amplitude of the negative responses having a latency of about 30 ms. Moreover, when applying the dipole model derived from analysis of responses to proximal stimulation to SEPs to distal stimulation, the source corresponding to the N30 distribution showed no activity, suggesting a strong relationship between joint and tendinous inputs and the activity of the N30 generator.     

Cortical excitability after myoclonus: jerk-locked somatosensory evoked potentials

Cortical excitability after myoclonus was investigated by electrically stimulating the median nerve just at the time of, or at intervals after, the onset of myoclonus and by averaging the EEG and EMG, using the myoclonus onset pulse as a trigger (jerk-locked somatosensory evoked potential technique). In a patient with "cortical reflex" myoclonus, cortical excitability was relatively enhanced for 20 msec just after the myoclonus, although it was suppressed throughout the postmyoclonus period. In a patient with Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, cortical excitability was suppressed between periodic myoclonic jerks. In a patient with oculopalatal-somatic myoclonus, there was no change of cortical excitability in relation to myoclonus.     

Pain-Related somatosensory evoked potentials.

The authors reviewed basic and clinical reports of pain-related somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) after high-intensity electrical stimulation [pain SSEP(E)] and painful laser stimulation [pain SSEP(L)]. The conduction velocity of peripheral nerves for both pain SSEP(E) and pain SSEP(L) is approximately 10 to 15 m/second, in a range of Adelta fibers. The generator sources are considered to be the secondary somatosensory cortex and insula, and the limbic system, including the cingulate cortex, amygdala, or hippocampus of the bilateral hemispheres. The latencies and amplitudes are clearly affected by vigilance, attention-distraction, and various kinds of stimulation applied simultaneously with pain. Abnormalities of pain SSEP(L) reflect an impairment of pain-temperature sensation, probably relating to dysfunction of A5 fibers of the peripheral nerve and spinothalamic tract. In contrast, conventional SSEP after nonpainful electrical stimulation reflects an impairment of tactile, vibratory, and deep sensation, probably relating to dysfunction of Aalpha or Abeta fibers of the peripheral nerve and dorsal column. Therefore, combining the study of pain SSEP(L) and conventional SSEP is useful to detect physiologic abnormalities, and sometimes subclinical abnormalities, of patients with peripheral and central nervous system lesions.