End stage renal disease in Brunei Darussalam – report from the first Brunei Dialysis Transplant Registry (BDTR)

Abstract

The Brunei Dialysis and Transplant Registry (BDTR) was established in 2011 to collect data from patients undergoing renal replacement therapy (RRT) in Brunei Darussalam. The chief aims of the registry are to obtain general demographic data for RRT patients and to determine disease burden attributable to End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD). The registry population comprises of all ESRD patients treated in Brunei Darussalam. Data domains include general demographic data, medical history, ESRD etiological causes, laboratory investigations, dialysis treatment and outcomes. There were 545 prevalent RRT patients in Brunei at the end of 2011. The incidence and prevalence of ESRD were 265 and 1250 per million population. Hemodialysis (HD), Peritoneal Dialysis (PD) and Transplant comprised of 83%, 11% and 6% of the RRT population, respectively. Diabetes mellitus accounted for 57% of all new incident cases. The mean serum hemoglobin, phosphate, calcium and iPTH were 11.0?±?1.6?g/dL, 1.9?±?0.5?mmol/L, 2.3?±?0.2?mmol/L and 202.5?±?323.4?ng/mL. Dialysis adequacy for HD and PD were 65.1 (urea reduction ratio) and 2.0?±?0.3 (Kt/v). 71 % of all prevalent HD had functioning AV fistulae and the peritonitis incidence was one in 24.5 patient-month/episode. The first BDTR has identified some deficiencies in the renal services in Brunei. However, it signals an important milestone for the establishment of benchmarked renal practice in the country. We hoped to maintain and improve our registry for years to come and will strive to align our standards to acceptable international practice.     

Surgical Interventions for Renal Replacement Therapy from the View of Nephrologists

Summary BACKGROUND: The number of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is increasing worldwide at a rate of approximately 5 % per year. In Austria, 6049 patients were suffering from ESRD in the year 2001, an annual rate of 1093 patients. Higher age of patients and co-morbidities are forcing nephrologists to find the optimal renal replacement therapy (RRT) and access modality for the individual patient. METHODS: For patients with ESRD needing RRT, both nephrologist and surgeon should be consulted to ensure optimal management and treatment including vascular access surgery. Patients planned for peritoneal dialysis (PD) are treated with the cooperation of a visceral surgeon. A catheter is inserted into the pelvic area to enable solution exchange. In patients who are to undergo hemodialysis (HD), nephrologists have to decide whether the cardiac condition is suitable for surgical access creation such as fistula or graft. Otherwise alternative hemodialysis devices such as a central venous catheter (CVC), or subcutaneously implantable ports (Dialock^®), have to be discussed. Access function is routinely monitored during dialysis treatment, but still remains the weak component of extracorporeal RRT responsible for 40 % of hospitalization of HD patients. RESULTS: At the dialysis unit of the University Hospital of Graz, 107 patients were under RRT (70 HD and 37 PD), and 235 patients were hemodialyzed in private units in Graz in 2001. 81 ESRD patients were newly enrolled in the chronic HD program. 131 HD accesses were created in new HD patients and patients under treatment for chronic HD. 36 patients developed HD access complications and in these patients, 181 surgical and/or radiological interventions were performed. CONCLUSIONS: In 12 % of the HD patients in Graz, access problems occurred. These patients have a high frequency of surgical and radiological interventions. Access monitoring and measurement of recirculation may help to reduce the complication rate by 38 %. Before onset of RRT, patients need special management to ensure the best dialysis modality. ESRD patients who are suffering from cardiac diseases, diabetes mellitus, or bad peripheral vascular status need a multidisciplinary approach with nephrologists, cardiologists, surgeons and radiologists working together to find the optimal access for dialysis treatment.     

Flux entre modalités de traitement de l’IRCT

This chapter provides indicators to describe the outcome of prevalent and incident patients in the various modalities of treatment.Among the 36 849 patients on dialysis at 31/10/2010, 79% were already on RRT at 31/12/2009. Respectively 91%, 85% and 93% of the patients on HD in-center, HD self-care unit and peritoneal dialysis were in the same modality of treatment the year before. Among the 29 758 patients with a functioning graft at 31/12/2010, 98% were already on RRT at 31/12/2009, 95% of them with a functioning graft.72%, 72% and 74% of the patients with in-center HD, outcenter HD and self-care unit were in the same modality of treatment at 31/12/2011. But 37% of the patients on PD at 31/12/2010 were not on PD at 31/12/2011.In 2011, new patients represented 89% of the entries in peritoneal dialysis. Renal transplantation represented 10% of the outcomes of the HD patients in self-care unit or at home.     

PD First: Peritoneal Dialysis as the Default Transition to Dialysis Therapy

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) and in‐center hemodialysis (HD) are accepted as clinically equivalent dialysis modalities, yet in‐center HD is the predominant renal replacement therapy (RRT) modality offered to new end‐stage renal disease (ESRD) patients in the United States and most other industrialized nations. This predominance has little to do with clinical outcomes, patient choice, cost, or quality of life. It has been driven by ease of HD initiation, physician experience and training, inadequate pre‐ESRD patient education, ample in‐center HD capacity, and lack of adequate infrastructure for PD‐related care. As compared with in‐center HD, PD is a widely applicable, yet underutilized modality of RRT that provides comparable clinical outcomes, superior quality of life measures, significant cost savings, and many other unmeasured advantages. A “PD First” approach not only has advantages for patients but also physicians, healthcare systems, and society. In this review, we will summarize evidence demonstrating that PD should be the default modality when new ESRD patients are transitioning to dialysis therapy when preemptive transplantation is not an option and highlight the essential infrastructural requirements to allow for a “PD First” model.     

The epidemiology of end-stage renal disease in the Baltic countries: an evolving picture.

INTRODUCTION: The epidemiology of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and renal replacement therapy (RRT) is under continuous evolution all over the world. Of particular interest is the development of RRT in the countries of the former Soviet bloc which underwent great political and socio-economical changes in the last decade. We report here the epidemiological analysis of ESRD and RRT in the three Baltic countries: Lithuania, Estonia, Latvia. Subjects and methods. This epidemiological report is based on data from centre questionnaires which were collected from 1996 onwards, with a response rate of 98-99%. RESULTS: The prevalence/incidence of RRT patients in 1999 were 213/99.5 p.m.p. in Lithuania, 186/45.5 p.m.p. in Estonia and 172/55.8 p.m.p. in Latvia. Haemodialysis (HD) was the most common RRT modality in Lithuania (60% of prevalent patients), but not in Estonia (29%), while in Latvia it was nearly as common as renal transplantation (45 and 46%, respectively). Home HD was not performed. The proportion treated by peritoneal dialysis (PD) was very low in Lithuania (4% of RRT patients), while the percentage was higher in Latvia (9%) and Estonia (20.4%). The percentage of patients on RRT treated by renal transplantation was high throughout, representing the main modality of treatment in Estonia (50.5% of RRT prevalent patients, 94 p.m.p.) and in Latvia (46%, 79 p.m.p.) and being high in Lithuania (36%, 77 p.m.p.). The main renal diseases leading to ESRD were glomerulonephritis, pyelonephritis and diabetes. CONCLUSION: The epidemiology of RRT in the Baltic countries is undergoing rapid changes. Transplantation has reached an impressive level. A high percentage of RRT patients live with a functioning graft.     

Timely transfer of peritoneal dialysis patients to hemodialysis improves survival rates

AIMS: The two main renal replacement therapies (RRT)--hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD)--have been considered to be antagonistic in most published studies on the clinical outcomes of dialysis patients. Recently, it has been suggested that the complementary use of both modalities as an integrated care (IC) strategy might improve the survival rate of end-stage renal disease patients. The aim of this study was to estimate the final clinical outcome of PD patients when they transfer to HD because of complications related to PD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from the following patients that started RRT during the last 10 years: 33 PD patients (IC group; age 55 +/- 15 years, mean +/- SD) who transferred to HD, 134 PD patients (PD group, age 64 +/- 11 years) who remained in PD, and 132 HD patients (HD group, age 48 +/- 16 years) who started and continued in HD. The main reasons for the transfer to HD were relapsed peritonitis and loss of ultrafiltration, while various comorbid risk factors were adjusted by Cox hazards regression model (age, presence of diabetes or/and cardiovascular disease, serum hemoglobin and albumin levels, as well as the modality per se). RESULTS: 3- and 5-year survival rates for the IC, PD and HD groups were 97% and 81%, 54% and 28%, and 92% and 83%, respectively. The 5-year survival rate was significantly higher in IC patients than in PD patients (p < 0.00001) but, was not different from that in HD patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that the IC of dialysis patients undergoing RRT improves the survival of patients on PD if they are transferred to HD upon the appearance of PD related complications.     

Home haemodialysis-international trends and variation.

BACKGROUND: Home haemodialysis (HD) has the best patient outcomes and is the most cost-effective of any dialysis modality, but its use has been declining in many countries. METHODS: Point prevalence rates of different dialysis modalities and transplantation were obtained from national and regional registries for the most recent available year (2001-03) for 21 high-income and 12 middle-income countries. Relationships with median age and prevalence of diabetic nephropathy, healthcare expenditure and population density were assessed. Long-term trends in the use of home HD during the last two to four decades were obtained for seven countries. RESULTS: The prevalence of home HD varies from 0 to 58.4 per million population, and varies between countries, more than any other renal replacement therapy (RRT) modality. There is a positive association between the use of peritoneal dialysis and home HD (Spearman's rho = 0.531, P = 0.013), but no correlation with transplantation prevalence. There is a negative correlation with median age of the renal replacement population (rho = -0.552, P = 0.018). There is no association with prevalence of diabetic nephropathy, healthcare expenditure or population density. Temporal trends in home HD prevalence are dramatically different in different countries, with several countries expanding its use in the last few years. CONCLUSION: The use of home HD varies dramatically between and within countries. The variation cannot be explained by the variation in the use of other RRT modalities, nor by prevalence of diabetic nephropathy, national wealth or population density. The inverse correlation with median age is difficult to explain. Significant expansion of home HD is likely to be possible in most countries, and will be increasingly important as the impressive results of more frequent HD gain credence.     

Twenty-five years of experience with out-center hemodialysis

Twenty-five years of experience with out-center hemodialysis. BACKGROUND: Out-center hemodialysis (HD) offers patients a better quality of life, a greater independence, and a better rehabilitation opportunity. A lower mortality than with other modalities of dialysis has been reported. In addition, in France the charges paid depend on the modality of dialysis, out-center HD being the less expensive, and savings are also accomplished through fewer patient transports, which are additionally reimbursed. We present a 25-year experience of out-center HD. METHODS: We retrospectively studied the clinical records of 471 patients treated between 1974 and 1997 in a single nonprofit organization operating regional home HD (H-HD) and facilities for self-care HD (SC-HD). Survival results were analyzed according to: (a) causes of end-stage renal disease, (b) age at the start of HD, (c) period of start of HD, (d) modality of HD (H-HD, SC-HD), and (e) a subgroup of 174 patients defined at risk because they were contraindicated for transplantation. RESULTS: The mean age at the start of HD increased from 31.2 +/- 9.7 (mean +/- SD) years in 1974 to 52.6 +/- 13.5 years in 1997. Causes of the end of treatment were: (a) transplantation (63%), (b) transfer (20%), and (c) death (17%). The overall survival was 90% at 5 years, 77% at 10 years, 62% at 15 years, and 45% at 20 years, and, for the group at risk, 78%, 62%, 46%, and 31%, respectively. Cox proportional hazard analyses showed that risk factors were older age, diabetes, and renal vascular diseases. CONCLUSION: If adequate choice is given, out-center HD offers a reliable and safe modality of dialysis with better survival results than survival in full-care in-center HD. In addition, out-center HD ensures a striking financial benefit as compared with the higher costs if the same patients were treated with full-care in-center HD. These modalities should be encouraged for all HD patients who are able to be treated by out-center modalities.     

End-stage renal disease in the El-Minia Governorate, upper Egypt: an epidemiological study

We had earlier conducted two cross-sectional studies on the epidemiology of endstage renal disease (ESRD) in the El-Minia Governorate. The aim of this study is to assess the prevalence, etiology and risk factors for ESRD in the El-Minia Governorate during the year 2006. Patients on renal replacement therapy (RRT), numbering 1356, were recruited into this study. A standardized questionnaire was completed including demographics, family history, risk factors for ESRD, environmental exposure to toxins, work conditions, social history and causes of death. Only 800 (59%) of the 1356 patients agreed to participate in this study. Their mean age was 46 ± 13 years, median 43 (range 18-80). The male vs. female ratio was 65% vs. 35%. The etiology of ESRD was unknown in 27%, hypertension in 20%, chronic glomerulonephritis in 11%, obstructive uropathy in 12%, bilhaziasis in 3%, analgesic nephropathy in 5%, chronic pyelonephritis in 5%, diabetic nephropathy in 8% and others, e.g. lupus in 9%. The overall prevalence of ESRD was 308 per million population (pmp). The modalities of RRT used on the study patients included hemodialysis (HD) in 1315 (97%), peritoneal dialysis (PD) in 27 (2%) and renal transplantation in 14 patients (1%). The death rate was 190/1000. Our study suggests that the epidemiology of ESRD in the El-Minia Governorate is different from that in European countries and the US and thus, region-specific interventions must be developed to control the epidemic of ESRD in the world.     

Malnutrition-inflammation-atherosclerosis (MIA) syndrome components in hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients

BACKGROUND: Malnutrition, inflammation, and atherosclerosis (MIA syndrome) are common in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. Each component of MIA syndrome is the predictor of outcomes in ESRD patients. In this cross-sectional study, we aimed to compare both dialysis modalities for MIA syndrome components. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty hemodialysis (HD) (mean age 44 +/- 11 years, 14 male and 16 female, mean time on dialysis: 31.0 +/- 19.0 months) and 30 continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients (41 +/- 9 years, 12 male and 18 female, mean time on dialysis: 25.5 +/- 21.5 months) were included. In order to determine malnutrition in ESRD patients, serum albumin level and anthropometric measurements were used. For inflammation, serum C-reactive protein level, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and fibrinogen levels were measured. Mean-carotid artery intima media thickness (m-CIMT), presence of carotid plaque and serum homocysteine level were used to determine atherosclerosis. RESULTS: Five CAPD patients (16%) and one HD patient (3%) was hypoalbuminemic. HD and CAPD groups were similar for inflammation. Mean-CIMT and serum homocysteine level were higher in HD patients than CAPD patients. There was a positive correlation between homocysteine and m-CIMT. CONCLUSION: Before choosing renal replacement therapy, malnutrition, inflammation, and atherosclerosis parameters must be investigated in ESRD patients. Hemodialysis seems to be more advantageous for malnutrition components than CAPD. Both dialysis modalities seem to be similar for inflammation, and CAPD modality has superiority for atherosclerosis. Before choosing the type of renal replacement therapy, assessment of MIA syndrome components could be useful for individualization of the decision on which dialytic modality is appropriate in ESRD patients.     

Current incidence, treatment patterns and outcome of end-stage renal disease among indigenous groups in Australia and New Zealand

SUMMARY: The changes in rates of treated end-stage renal disease (ESRD) among indigenous populations have profound consequences for those individuals affected and for health-care providers. By using data from the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant (ANZDATA) Registry, we examined the current incidence, treatment and outcomes of ESRD among indigenous groups in Australia and New Zealand. All patients who began renal replacement therapy (RRT) in Australia or New Zealand between October 1991 and September 2000 were included. Rates of ESRD, RRT modalities, renal transplantation and mortality were the outcomes examined. End-stage renal disease rates among indigenous groups in Australia and New Zealand exceeded non-indigenous rates up to eightfold. The median age of indigenous ESRD patients was younger (51 vs 60 years, P  < 0.0001), and there was an excess of comorbidities, particularly diabetes. For Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders, and New Zealand Maori patients, mortality rates across all modalities of RRT were 70% higher than non-indigenous rates. Indigenous people were less likely to receive a renal transplant prior to dialysis treatment, less likely to be accepted onto the cadaveric transplant waiting list, and less likely to receive a well-matched transplant. The poorer outcomes among Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders, and New Zealand Maori patients did not appear to be explained by the different comorbid conditions or age. Whether the outcomes reflect unmeasured differences in disease burden or treatment differences is not known. Tackling this problem will involve a spectrum of people and approaches, from tertiary care providers and RRT to local staff and preventative programs.     

Survey on the current status of delivered informed consent for renal replacement therapy among patients with end-stage renal disease

We conducted a survey on the adequacy of delivered informed consent (IC) among patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) regarding the information provided on renal replacement therapies (RRT): Hemodialysis (HD), peritoneal dialysis (PD), and renal transplantation (RTx). A self-assessment style of questionnaire entitled "Informed consent for the selection of dialysis therapy modality" was prepared for evaluation, and the adequacy of IC was scored by 5 grades ranging from "excellent" to "bad". The questionnaire was sent to all the JSDT registered facilities (n=3484), and 480 centers replied (13.8%). Among these, 407 centers had patients introduced onto some form of RRT modality in the last 12 months. As to the adequacy of delivered IC for each modality, "excellent and good" status was reported as follows: 80.8% in HD, 49.8% in PD, and 32.5% in RTx, respectively. The major reason for "poor and bad" IC adequacy in PD and RTx, was "not available in the facility". By analyzing the facilities stratified by the clinical experiences of each modality in the past, poorly delivered IC for PD and RTx was revealed in centers lacking experience. Delivered information about RRT to ESRD patients may be biased in Japan. The findings of this study suggested that a lack of medical experience of the modality contributes to insufficient IC.     

Survival and transplantation outcomes of children less than 2 years of age with end-stage renal disease

Background

Young children with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) have traditionally experienced high rates of morbidity and mortality; however, detailed long-term follow-up data is limited.

Methods

Using a population-based retrospective cohort with data from a national organ failure registry and administrative data from Canada’s universal health care system, we analysed the outcomes of 87 children starting RRT (before age 2 years) and followed them until death or date of last contact [median follow-up 4.7 years, interquartile range (IQR) 1.4–9.8). We assessed secular trends in survival and the influence of: (1) age at start of RRT and (2) etiology of ESRD with survival and time to transplantation.

Results

Patients were mostly male (69.0 %) with ESRD predominantly due to renal malformations (54.0 %). Peritoneal dialysis was the most common initial RRT (83.9 %). Fifty-seven (65.5 %) children received a renal transplant (median age at first transplant: 2.7 years, IQR 2.0–3.3). During 490 patient-years of follow-up, there were 23 (26.4 %) deaths, of which 22 occurred in patients who had not received a transplant. Mortality was greater for patients commencing dialysis between 1992 and 1999 and among the youngest children starting RRT (0–3 months). Children with ESRD secondary to renal malformations had better survival than those with ESRD due to other causes. Among the transplanted patients, all but one survived to the end of the observation period.

Conclusion

Children who start RRT before 3 months of age have a high risk of mortality. Among our paediatric patient cohort, mortality rates were much lower among children who had received a renal transplant.     

Dialysis as bridge therapy for renal transplantation: single center experience, a comparison of hemodialysis and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplantation is the most ideal treatment in renal replacement therapy for patients with end-stage renal disease. However, the prevalence of transplantation is extremely low and most patients with ESRD should continue dialysis for their whole life. Recently, high transposition rate of renal transplantation from peritoneal dialysis (PD) was reported, however, it was unclear whether a difference in dialytic modality can influence the outcome. Therefore, we evaluated the influence of dialytic modality on the rate of kidney transplantation and outcome in our single center. METHODS: Forty-two kidney transplants were carried among 1,573 dialysis patients from the years 1986 to 2004 in our center. Transposition rates from two modalities (HD and PD) and graft survival were compared. The incidence of acute rejection episode, complications after receiving transplantations, and coexisting diseases were also evaluated between the two modalities prior to transplantation. RESULT: The number of patients who received HD was larger than PD (HD 77.1%, PD 22.9%, respectively). Forty-two patients undergoing dialytic therapy received a living-donor kidney transplantation. Overall graft survival was 92% at 5 years and 75% at 10 years. Among these cases, dialytic modality prior to transplantation was 57.1% in HD, and 42.9% in PD. The transfer rate from PD to transplantation was significantly (p = 0.0036) higher (4.7%) than that of HD (1.9%). The reason for the high transfer rate of PD patients might be cooperation with their family and the provision of relevant information by nephrologists during PD. There were no differences between the two modalities prior to transplantation in the graft survival rate, incidence of acute rejection, and complications before and after transplantation. CONCLUSION: Difference in pretransplant dialysis modality did not affect the outcomes, however, the transfer rate from PD was significantly higher than from HD. Accordingly, PD is useful compared to HD as bridge therapy for kidney transplantation from the high feasibility of living-donor kidney transplantation.     

Survival and development of cardiovascular disease by modality of treatment in patients with end-stage renal disease.

Patients undergoing dialysis are at high risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD). The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of hemodialysis (HD) versus peritoneal dialysis (PD) on survival and the risk of developing de novo CVD. Of the 4191 patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) who started renal replacement treatment (RRT) in Lombardy between 1994 and 1997, 4064 (who were on dialysis 30 d after the start of RRT) were considered for survival analysis: 2772 were on HD (mean age 60.9 yr; 21.2% diabetic) and 1292 on PD (mean age 63.6 yr; 16% diabetic). The 3120 patients who were free of CVD at the start of RRT were included in the analysis of the risk of developing de novo CVD. HD and PD were compared by use of a Cox-regression proportional hazard model, stratified by diabetic status; the explanatory covariates were age and gender. The death rate was 13.3 per 100 patient-years (13.0 on HD and 13.9 on PD); 197 (6.3%) of the 3120 patients included in the CVD analysis developed de novo CVD (128 on HD and 69 on PD). After adjustment for age, gender, and established CVD and stratification by diabetic status, there was no significant between-treatment difference in 4-yr survival (relative risk [RR], 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79 to 1.06). The risk of de novo CVD did not differ significantly by treatment modality (RR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.43). The risk of mortality and de novo CVD for new patients with ESRD assigned to HD or PD was similar in Lombardy in the period 1994 through 1997.     

Survival analysis of pediatric dialysis patients in Taiwan

Aim: The long‐term survival of Taiwanese children with end‐stage renal disease (ESRD) has not been reported before. This study aimed to determine the long‐term survival, mortality hazards and causes of death in paediatric patients receiving dialysis. Methods: Paediatric patients (aged 19 years and younger) with incident ESRD who were reported to the Taiwan Renal Registry from 1995 to 2004 were included. A total of 319 haemodialysis (HD) and 156 peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients formed the database. After stratification by dialysis modality, multivariate Cox proportional‐hazards model was constructed with age, sex and co‐morbidity as predictive variables. Results: The annual paediatric ESRD incidence rate was 8.12 per million of age‐related populations. The overall 1‐, 5‐, and 10‐year survival rates for PD patients were 98.1%, 88.0% and 68.4%, respectively, and were 96.9%, 87.3% and 78.5% for HD patients. The survival analysis showed no significant difference between HD and PD (P = 0.4878). Using ‘15–19 years’ as a reference group, the relative risk (RR) of the youngest group (0–4 years) was 6.60 (95% CI: 2.50–17.38) for HD, and 5.03 (95% CI: 1.23–20.67) for PD. The death rate was 24.66 per 1000 dialysis patient‐years. The three major causes of death were infection (23.4%), cardiovascular disease (13.0%) and cerebrovascular disease (10.4%). Hemorrhagic stroke (87.5%) was the main type of foetal cerebrovascular accident. Conclusion: We conclude that there was no significant difference of paediatric ESRD patient survival between HD and PD treatment in Taiwan. The older paediatric ESRD patients had better survival than younger patients.     

Health status and quality of life reported by incident patients after 1 year on haemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis.

BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that there are no large differences in the quality of life of incident patients starting on haemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD), but few studies have addressed this issue. METHODS: Association of modality with incident patients' health status and quality of life scores was investigated with propensity score (PS) analysis and also with traditional multivariable regression analyses. We compared patient reported health status and quality of life scores after 1 year of therapy in 455 HD and 413 PD patients who participated in a national study, stayed on the same modality and had complete socio-demographic and clinical information needed to create a PS indicating their expected probability of starting on PD. RESULTS: One year scores on the majority of health status and quality of life measures were not significantly different for HD and PD patients within propensity-matched quintiles. PD patients' scores were higher than HD patients' scores on effects of kidney disease, burden of kidney disease, staff encouragement and satisfaction with care in some quintiles, and traditional regression analyses confirmed that dialysis modality was associated with patients' scores on these variables. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides support for making the choice of PD more widely available as an option to patients initiating chronic dialysis therapy. Patient lifestyle opportunities associated with use of PD, a home-based and self-care therapy, may also apply to home-based HD or in-centre self-care HD. Patients' expectations regarding treatment and their attitudes toward management of their health may interact with treatment modality to shape patient-reported experience on dialysis; this is an important focus for future studies.     

Improved outcome of young children on nightly automated peritoneal dialysis

We reviewed our center’s experience with nightly automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) as maintenance renal replacement therapy (RRT) for infants and children under the age of 5 years and compared it with national dialysis and transplant data. A retrospective chart review of 19 consecutive patients with the onset of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) before 5 years of age (mean = 1.8 years) between June 1988 and June 1994 was performed. All patients received nightly APD, supplemental feedings, calcitriol, erythropoietin, and 10 of 19 were on growth hormone (rhGH) therapy. The growth of our patients was maintained or improved during the study period, with the 10 of 19 on rhGH gaining a mean of one standard deviation in height when followed for 2 years. Our school-age children were all in age-appropriate classes. There were no deaths in our group; the incidence of peritonitis was lower than in national data. We conclude that APD is a realistic option for the treatment of ESRD in the 0- to 5-year-old child. Because of the improved graft and patient survival in older children, APD in a specialized center might be the RRT of choice in this age group, allowing good growth and development while maximizing the chances of an eventual and successful renal transplant. Received August 21, 1996; received in revised form and accepted March 26, 1997     

Effects of Different Dialysis Modalities on Cardiac Autonomic Dysfunctions in End‐Stage Renal Disease Patients: One Year Prospective Study

Cardiac autonomic dysfunction (CAD) is a common problem in patients with end‐stage renal disease (ESRD) and may contribute to the risk of cardiac mortality. Long‐term effects of dialysis modalities on CAD in ESRD patients are not clear. In this one‐year prospective study, we studied the effects of different dialysis modalities on CAD in ESRD patients. The study consisted of 20 ESRD patients who had the indications for initiating dialysis therapy (13 hemodialysis and 7 CAPD patients) and 15 healthy controls (M/F: 5/10; age 30 ± 4). In all the subjects, first at the beginning of study (in patient groups just before initiating dialysis therapy) and then after 12 months, we studied 24 hours ECG‐Holter monitoring and heart rate variability parameters (time and frequency domain analysis parameters; SDNN: standard deviations of nn intervals, rMSSD: square root of the median of standard deviation, HRVI: heart rate variability index, LF/HF: low frequency/high frequency). In ESRD patients, before dialysis therapy, all the parameters of time domain analysis were significantly lower compared to control group (p = 0.001). In patient groups, after dialysis therapy (on the 12th month), significant improvement was observed in time domain analysis parameters (p = 0.001). When dialysis modalities were compared, the increase in the time domain analysis parameters was significantly greater in the CAPD group compared to hemodialysis (HD) group. Our findings suggest that CAD is frequent in ESRD patients, a dialysis therapy of 12 months can cause significant improvement on CAD and the ameliorative effect of CAPD is better than HD.     

Agalsidase therapy in patients with Fabry disease on renal replacement therapy: a nationwide study in Italy.

BACKGROUND: In Fabry disease, end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and severe neurologic and cardiac complications represent the leading causes of late morbidity and mortality. A comprehensive Italian nationwide survey study was conducted to explore changes in cardiac status and renal allograft function in Fabry patients on renal replacement therapy (RRT) and enzyme replacement therapy (ERT). METHODS: This study was designed as a cross-sectional survey study with prospective follow-up. Of the 34 patients identified via searches in registries, 31 males and 2 females who received RRT and ERT (agalsidase beta in 30 patients, agalsidase alpha in 3) were included. Left ventricular mass index (LVMI), interventricular septal thickness at end diastole (IVSD), left ventricular posterior wall thickness (LVPWT) and renal allograft function were assessed at ERT baseline and subsequently at yearly intervals. RESULTS: The patients in the dialysis and transplant groups had been started on dialysis at age 42.0 and 37.1 years (mean), respectively, and patients in the transplant group received their renal allograft at age 39.8 years (mean). The mean age at the start of ERT was similar, 44.1 and 44.6 years, respectively. The mean RRT follow-up was 61.1 and 110.6 months for dialysis and transplant patients, respectively, whereas the ERT duration was 45.1 and 48.4 months, respectively. Cardiac parameters increased in dialysis patients. In transplant patients, mean LVMI seemed to plateau during agalsidase therapy at a lower level as compared to baseline. Decline in renal allograft function was relatively mild (-1.92 ml/min/year). Agalsidase therapy was well tolerated. Serious ERT-unrelated events occurred more often in the dialysis group. CONCLUSIONS: Kidney transplantation should be the standard of care for Fabry patients progressing towards ESRD. Transplanted Fabry patients on ERT may do better than patients remaining on maintenance dialysis. Larger, controlled studies in Fabry patients with ESRD will have to demonstrate if ERT is able to change the trajectory of cardiac disease and can preserve graft renal function.