Factors influencing career choice among medical students interested in surgery

PURPOSE: The number of applicants to general surgery programs has recently declined. We set out to determine factors that influence career choice among medical students. METHODS: Design: survey; Setting: university medical center; Participants: fourth-year medical students; Intervention: distribution and completion of the survey. Participants ranked 18 items coded on a Likert scale from 1 (not important) to 8 (very important). These factors were career opportunities, academic opportunities, experience on core rotation/subinternship, role model(s) in that specialty (mentors), length of training required, lifestyle during residency, work hours during residency, ability to obtain residency position, concern about loans/debt, call schedule, lifestyle after training, work hours after training, financial rewards after training, intellectual challenge, patient relationships/interaction, prestige, future patient demographics, and gender distribution in the specialty. Students were asked to provide gender, career choice, number of programs they applied to, and the number of programs at which they were interviewed. RESULTS: A total of 111 of the 160 surveys distributed were returned (69%). A total of 48 of the students were men, 31 were women, and 32 did not identify their gender. Nineteen students were interested in pursuing a career in surgery or a surgical subspecialty. Factors predicting surgery as a career choice were career opportunities (p < 0.04) and prestige (p < 0.003). Lifestyle during residency (p < 0.0007), work hours during residency (p < 0.008), and quality of patient/physician relationships (p < 0.05) were all significantly negatively correlated with the choice of a surgical career. Students pursuing a surgical career applied to greater than 31 programs compared with 11 to 15 for the nonsurgical students (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Prestige and career opportunities are more important to students seeking surgical residencies. Concerns about lifestyle and work hours during residency and perceived quality of patient/physician relationships were deterrents to surgery as a career choice. These issues may need to be addressed to increase the number of applicants to surgical programs.     

Brief intervention by surgeons can influence students toward a career in surgery

BACKGROUND: General surgery training programs are experiencing an alarming decrease in applicants. The purpose of the current study was to determine whether exposing students to surgery through a brief intervention early in their medical education could influence perceptions toward surgery as a career choice. METHODS: First-year medical students were asked to rank 19 items coded on a Likert-type scale from 1 (not important) to 8 (very important) regarding their beliefs about surgery as a career both before and after a brief 1-h intervention with a panel of surgeons. Each panelist spoke about his or her professional and personal lives, followed by a question and answer period. Survey data were analyzed by Wilcoxon sign-rank and Spearman rank correlation. RESULTS: Of 210 first year students, 121 (58%) students voluntarily attended and completed the presurvey and 94 (45%) the post, of which 82 were matched responses. Preintervention responses revealed that career opportunities, intellectual challenge, and the ability to obtain a residency position were positively correlated with surgery (P < 0.007) whereas length of training, lifestyle during residency, lifestyle after training, and work hours during residency were negatively correlated (P < 0.01). The following factors were significantly influenced by the intervention: academic opportunities, patient relationships, prestige, and gender distribution became more important whereas concern about debt and length of training became less important. CONCLUSIONS: Positive encounters with surgeons can favorably influence the perceptions of first-year medical students toward a career in surgery. In addition to addressing lifestyle issues, surgeons can and must make a concerted effort to interact with medical students early in their education and foster their interest throughout their career.     

What influences medical students' choice of surgical careers

BACKGROUND: Recent emphasis in medical education has been to encourage students to pursue primary care careers. This could have a negative impact on applications to surgical residencies. METHODS: To determine what factors are most influential for a student to pursue a surgical career in spite of this environment, third- and fourth-year medical students were surveyed with a 40-item questionnaire. RESULTS: The response rate was 37% (76/205). Those students considering a career in surgery were more likely than their counterparts to be motivated by role models (P <.006), career opportunities (P <.006), and academic opportunities (P <.013) in surgery. They were less likely than their counterparts to be discouraged from surgery on the basis of lifestyle (P <.001), time commitment (P <.001), call schedules (P <.001), or residency length (P <.028). No differences regarding financial rewards, research opportunities, or intellectual challenges were seen between the groups. Neither race nor sex had a significant role in the selection of surgery as a career. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggests that students are more likely to be influenced to pursue surgical careers by offering early exposure to positive role models and career and academic opportunities in surgery. Knowledge of these influences on student career choices should help surgical educators attract and maintain student interest in surgical careers.     

Factors influencing medical students and junior doctors in choosing a career in surgery

Background/purposeIdentification of those factors which influence career choice will help to avoid a shortfall in surgical recruitment. We aimed to determine the views of medical students and junior doctors regarding influences on their career aspirations, such that potential disincentives to a career in surgery could be identified.MethodsA structured questionnaire was distributed in paper-form and online. 290 respondents were asked to score 20 items regarding influence on their career aspirations using Likert-scales ranging from 1 (no influence) to 5 (strong influence). Stepwise regression was employed to determine those factors most important when considering a surgical career.ResultsThe response rate was 84%. 13.2% of respondents felt they would choose surgery, with males more likely to see it as a realistic career choice (p = 0.006). Factors which most influenced career choice were future employment, career opportunities, and intellectual challenge. Those aspiring to a career in surgery placed most emphasis on prestige, whilst an emphasis on lifestyle during training was associated with those choosing an alternative to surgery. Influences varied according to career stage.ConclusionsFuture employment, career opportunities and intellectual challenge are most important when considering which discipline to choose within medicine, with job prestige of particular importance to those interested in a surgical career. These findings represent an opportunity for surgical educators to reinforce the positive aspects of life as a surgeon, and the job security which is inherent within a surgical career. Surgery remains a disproportionately unpopular choice for women, with lifestyle factors identified as the key deterrent.     

Influence of spousal opinions on residency selection.

Fourth-year medical students face the difficult task of choosing a residency consistent with their career goals. Our study investigates the input of the spouse on the residency selection. From July 1, 1988, to July 1, 1990, questionnaires were sent to all 69 spouses of fourth-year medical students at the University of Arizona Medical Center. Fifty-six were returned for a response rate of 81%. Of the 16 women and 40 men who responded (mean age: 27 years), 55 (98%) spouse stated that there had been family discussions on the choice of a residency program, and 41 (73%) respondents thought that they had significant input. When asked to rank the items that most influenced their support for a particular training program, career goals of the medical student (68%) and lifestyle (21%) were most important, whereas prestige, earning capacity, and program length were ranked lowest. Specific concerns expressed by spouses on the selection of a surgical residency included time commitment as the most commonly cited (79%), followed by fatigue (48%). A statistically significant correlation existed between those spouses actively discouraging the choice of general surgery and those objecting to the time commitment during residency (p less than 0.05). We conclude that spouses have significant preferences regarding the choice of a training program following medical school. Career goals and lifestyle appear to be the most important factors; however, despite concern about the time commitment, the majority of spouses are supportive of the selection of a surgical residency.     

Medical students' view on thoracic surgery residency programs in a Japanese medical school

There has been a decline in the number of medical students applying for thoracic surgery training programs. We obtained knowledge of medical students' views on thoracic surgery residency programs. After completion of thoracic surgery clerkship, 17 students were asked to fill out questionnaires on first-year thoracic surgery residency programs. The majority of students considered thoracic surgery to be held in high regard by the general public, and felt that the salary was sufficient. However, only one student chose a thoracic surgery training program. The main reason for not applying for thoracic surgery residency was lifestyle issues. The factors in determining career choice included quality of education and work hours. Medical students are likely to select specialties other than thoracic surgery. Since the main factor influencing medical students' career is the quality of education in a residency program, efforts should be made to improve the quality of education.     

Medical students'' view on thoracic surgery residency programs in a Japanese medical school

There has been a decline in the number of medical students applying for thoracic surgery training programs. We obtained knowledge of medical students' views on thoracic surgery residency programs. After completion of thoracic surgery clerkship, 17 students were asked to fill out questionnaires on first-year thoracic surgery residency programs. The majority of students considered thoracic surgery to be held in high regard by the general public, and felt that the salary was sufficient. However, only one student chose a thoracic surgery training program. The main reason for not applying for thoracic surgery residency was lifestyle issues. The factors in determining career choice included quality of education and work hours. Medical students are likely to select specialties other than thoracic surgery. Since the main factor influencing medical students' career is the quality of education in a residency program, efforts should be made to improve the quality of education. Read at the Fifty-fouth Annual Meeting of The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery, Symposium, Osaka, October 3–5, 2001.     

Altering the career choice: Can we attract more women to vascular surgery?

Vascular surgery has relied upon the pool of general surgical residents for candidates for residency. This has significantly limited the pool of applicants. With the advent of new primary certificate training paradigms, we investigated factors that might alter the career choices for women medical students. A Web-based survey was conducted of third-year and fourth-year medical students at three university-affiliated programs. A total of 140 students completed the survey, which identified the third year of medical school as the primary year when students committed to a final career choice. Lifestyle issues were the primary deterrents, with long work hours and lack of time to see family negatively influencing students' interest in surgery. Eliminating the need for 5 years of general surgery and the opportunity for part-time training were cited as factors that would alter students' decisions to pursue vascular surgery. Ultimately, a positive rotation experience, lifestyle issues, and mentors impacted on final career decisions. To attract the best applicants to the field, we need to continue to be active in mentoring students and exploring alternative training paths and eventual career practices.     

Can Brief Interventions by Hand Surgeons Influence Medical Students Toward a Career in Hand Surgery?

PURPOSE: In 2004, the American Society for Surgery of the Hand and the American Association for Hand Surgery formed a joint task force to deal with the difficulty of promoting hand surgery as a career choice to medical students. The purpose of this study was to use a previously validated format to expose medical students to a brief intervention early in their medical education that might influence their perceptions of hand surgery as a career choice. METHODS: First-year medical students were asked to rank 11 items on a Likert scale from 1 (not important) to 5 (very important) regarding their beliefs about hand surgery as a career before and after a brief 1-hour presentation by a hand surgeon. Additional information about career choice and prior exposure to hand surgery was obtained before the intervention, and student interest in hand surgery was measured after the intervention. RESULTS: Of 110 first-year medical students, 72 (65%) students completed both the pre-lecture survey and the post-lecture survey. Of the 72 students with matched responses, 8 (11%) ranked surgery as their first career choice, whereas 13 (18%) ranked a surgical subspecialty as their first choice. Thirty-nine (54%) students stated that the lecture raised their interest in hand surgery as a possible career, and 36 (50%) were interested in doing an elective in it while in medical school. Nonparametric tests showed improvement in knowledge after the lecture for length of training, technical aspects, intellectual challenge, and fellowship requirements. CONCLUSIONS: A positive information-providing encounter with a hand surgeon may favorably influence the perceptions of first-year medical students toward hand surgery.     

Impact of mandatory resident work hour limitations on medical students' interest in surgery

BACKGROUND: The number of US medical students applying for general surgery residency has been declining. Recent studies have shown that the issue of "controllable lifestyle" has become a critical factor in medical students' decision-making process. We postulate that widespread implementation of resident work hour limitations would bolster medical students' interest in pursuing surgical careers. STUDY DESIGN: Students from New York University School of Medicine were surveyed about their attitudes toward work hour limitations and its effect on their interest in pursuing a surgical residency. One hundred thirty-two students participated. RESULTS: Nearly 95% of respondents believed that work hour limitations were a positive change and, if all other factors were equal, they would choose a training program that used work hour limitations over one that did not. The most common reasons cited in favor of limits were improvements in resident lifestyle (42%) and patient safety (34%). Fifty-three percent of respondents indicated that presence of work hour limitations alone would increase their interest in considering a surgical residency and only 2% of medical students indicated that it would lessen their interest in surgery. Not surprisingly, intellectual interest in a specialty was the most important factor in choosing a residency for 86% of students. Nevertheless, work hour limitations were designated a higher priority than future salary by 55% of medical students. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of work hour limitations has a positive impact on medical students' interest in surgery. Widespread implementation of work hour limitations may bolster the number of applications for surgical residency.     

Undergraduate experience of surgical teaching and its influence and its influence on career choice

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this survey was to determine the views of final year medical students in Melbourne regarding both undergraduate surgical teaching and the students' career aspirations. METHODS: A structured questionnaire was given to all final year medical students at Monash and Melbourne Universities in 2003. The questions dealt with the factors influencing graduating medical students, including theatre experience, encouragement/support from surgeons, presence of mentors, lifestyle factors and gender issues. RESULTS: The response rate was 61.2% (251/410). Of these, 50.6% were male, 32.3% declared an interest in surgical training with the remainder either uncertain (24%) or uninterested (44%). Male students were more likely to be interested in surgery. General surgery was the most popular field (69%), followed by plastic surgery (37%) and orthopaedic surgery (35%). Of respondents, 78% reported positive influences towards pursuing a surgical career during their undergraduate years, while 63% reported a negative experience. A total of 67% believed that the current curriculum is adequate and 43% that there is enough support/encouragement towards a surgical career. Only 44% of respondents reported that surgeons are approachable. Lifestyle and family factors were the most important career influence. In particular, 57% of female respondents felt discouraged from pursuing a surgical career and 99% of these women reported lifestyle/family factors as the main source of discouragement, with a further 72% identifying a lack of female role models. CONCLUSIONS: This survey highlights important issues in current undergraduate perception of surgical teaching and higher training. Issues that may encourage or discourage a graduating student to pursue a surgical career are identified.     

Effects of a laparoscopic course on student interest in surgical residency.

BACKGROUND: The number of surgical residency applicants has been declining. Early introduction of the discipline of surgery is thought to stimulate early interest in surgical residency. This study investigated the hypothesis that a laparoscopic skills course introduced in preclinical years would stimulate student interest in entering surgical residency. METHODS: Preclinical medical students participated in a laparoscopic skills training course. All students underwent an animate laboratory at the beginning and at the end of the course. Students were divided into 4 separate groups: virtual reality, box trainer, both trainers, and control group. Before and after the course, students were asked their residency interest. First- and second-year medical students participated in the course. RESULTS: Before the course, 56% of the students desired to go into general surgery or a surgical subspecialty. After the course, 49% of the students expressed interest in entering general surgery or a surgical subspecialty. A decrease occurred in students who desired to go into surgical subspecialty residency from 31% to 15% (P = NS), and an increase occurred in students who desired to go into general surgery residency from 25% to 34% (P = NS). No statistically significant difference was seen in the 4 individual training subgroup analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Participation in a laparoscopic skills course does not affect medical student interest in entering surgical residency. A trend was noted in students choosing general surgery over surgical subspecialty training after this course. Surgical educators need to investigate methods to encourage preclinical medical student interest in surgical residencies.     

Why do students choose careers in surgery?

BACKGROUND: Recent changes in medical education have emphasized primary care careers. This could have a negative impact on the number of applicants to surgical residencies. We hypothesized that experiences during the third year surgical clerkship are influential for students' subsequent residency choice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Third year medical students who completed their surgical clerkship in the 2001-02 academic year were surveyed pre- and post-surgical clerkship. Responses were analyzed and correlated to the 2003 match results. RESULTS: The response rate of students surveyed was 98% (82 surveys/83 match results). Pre-clerkship, 6/82 students (7%) expressed an interest in surgery or surgical subspecialty careers. Post-clerkship, 34/84 students (40%) expressed an increased interest a surgical career; 13/84 (15%) expressed a decreased interest, and 37% of students expressed no change in career interest. Of those students expressing an increased interest in surgery, the clerkship experiences most noted to be influential were (1) number of cases participated/scrubbed (95%), (2) resident interaction (85%), (3) faculty interaction (80%), and (4) number of cases observed (65%). The number of hours spent on rotation (call, rounds) was the leading experience associated with a decreased interest in a surgical career. 12/83 students surveyed (14%) ultimately matched into a surgical program (NRMP 2003 match results). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that operative exposure and interaction with residents and faculty have a positive influence in students' choice of a surgical career. Although only 6% of students expressed an interest in surgery pre-clerkship, a 2-fold increase in this number was noted in choice of residency (14%). Work hours were the primary negative indicator for surgery residency. As medical curriculum is restructured and surgical exposure decreased, these data underscore the importance of quality exposure to both procedures and role models during the 3rd year surgical clerkship.     

Are there gender differences in choosing a surgical career?

BACKGROUND: Interest in general surgery has declined among US medical students, with the increasing number of female medical students being cited as a causative factor. This study evaluates factors related to choosing a general surgery career and determines if they differ between men and women. METHODS: A survey assessing factors that contributed to career choice was distributed to a 2002 graduating medical school class to be returned with their match lists. Students were asked, from a given list, which factors influenced their career choice. Those students who did not pursue a career in general surgery were asked what factors contributed to that decision. The results were stratified by gender. RESULTS: Of 120 surveys, 54 women and 48 men responded (response rate=85%). The reason most commonly cited for a particular career choice by both men and women was the intellectual challenge of the field, chosen by 41 men (85%) and 46 women (85%). The two next most common reasons cited by male students were an elective in the field and practice lifestyle (40 of 48 respondents, or 82%, for each). Practice lifestyle was a contributing factor for 37 of the 54 women, or 69% (P=.132). The other reasons most commonly cited by women were an elective and faculty in the chosen field (46 of 54, or 85%, and 38 of 54, or 70%). Thirty-seven of the 48 men, or 77% (P=.588), felt that faculty in the field contributed to their career choice. The most commonly cited reasons for not choosing general surgery--residency lifestyle, practice lifestyle, and length of training--were the same for both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Fewer women than men considered practice lifestyle in choosing their medical career. However, both men and women considered lifestyle, elective in the field of choice, and faculty important in career choice. In 2002, men and women had the same reasons for pursuing a career in general surgery or seeking another specialty.     

Minimally invasive surgery

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS), or laparoscopic surgery, plays a vital role in residency training in a number of surgical disciplines including general surgery, surgical oncology, colorectal surgery, pediatric surgery, and thoracic surgery. The tremendous patient demand for MIS over the past 2 decades has resulted in surgeons rapidly embracing this technique. Many general surgery residencies cover basic laparoscopy within their residency program; however, the experience with more advanced cases is more variable. This career resource guides the interested medical student and physician to opportunities for fellowship training in MIS. It includes a discussion of the specialty, training requirements, grant funding, research fellowships, and pertinent societies.     

Factors affecting choice of surgical residency training program

BACKGROUND: A significant problem facing American surgery today is the lack of participation from women and minorities. In 1995 and 1996, 15.1 and 15.8% of United States general surgical residency graduates were women. Of our 71 graduates in the last 12 years, 38% were women. The aim of this study was to identify the factors influencing our residents' choice of training program and the reasons why our program has a high percentage of female graduates. METHODS: Between 1989 and 2000, 27 women and 44 men completed general surgical training at our university and 44/71 (59%) responded to our survey. The age at residency completion was 34 +/- 2.2 years for men and 33.9 +/- 2.8 years for women. Fifty-five percent of men and 30% of women went on to fellowship training; and 36% of men and 20% of women are in academia. RESULTS: Factors influencing our graduates' selection of training program are: Only 23% of men had a female faculty as their mentor, whereas 90% of women had a male faculty as their mentor during training. Only 59% of men but 80% of women (P < 0.05) agreed that female medical students need role models of successful female faculty members. Fifty-five percent of men and 45% of women would encourage a female medical student to choose surgery as a career, but 82% of men and 50% of women would encourage a male medical student to do so. Ninety-one percent of men and 85% of women would choose surgery as a career again. CONCLUSIONS: A surgical residency training program with strong leadership, good clinical experience, and high resident morale will equally attract both genders. Women may pay more attention to the program's gender mix and geographic location.     

Medical student concerns and fears before their third-year surgical clerkship

BACKGROUND: This study describes the personal concerns of third-year medical students beginning their surgical clerkship. To assess these needs, we studied the expectations, interests, and concerns of beginning surgical clerks. METHODS: Beginning surgical clerks during the 2002-2003 academic year were invited to respond to a written survey. Responses were categorized into domains of interest and domains of concern. Analysis controlled for prior surgical experience, interest in a surgical career, and academic term. RESULTS: The response rate was 83%. Students were most curious about surgical practice, technical skills, and issues of lifestyle/balance among surgeons. Students were most concerned about fatigue, long hours, potential mental abuse, and poor performance. Differences between groups are described. CONCLUSIONS: Beginning surgical clerks have questions and concerns about topics often not addressed in the curriculum or syllabus. This study suggests the nature of improvements that could assist the inexperienced student in creating a positive clerkship experience and guiding their choice of career.     

Has implementation of the 80-hour work week made a career in surgery more appealing to medical students?

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to determine if a surgical career became more appealing to medical students with the resident work week limited to 80 hours. METHODS: At the start and conclusion of each surgery clerkship rotation, students completed a survey addressing perception of surgeons, and surgery as a career. They were divided into the control groups (rotations before July 2003; n = 109) and the experimental group (rotations after July 2003; n = 108). RESULTS: Students in the experimental group had a significantly more favorable impression of a surgeon's lifestyle and work hours than those in the control group. This was especially true of female students post-rotation, who responded more positively to the statement that a surgical career would allow for a good balance between professional and personal life (1.87 vs 2.45, P <.01). CONCLUSION: The new Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) regulation has had a positive impact on students' perceptions of the surgeon's lifestyle, but does not necessarily increase their interest in a surgical career.