Insulin lispro (Lys(B28), Pro(B29) in the treatment of diabetes during the fasting month of Ramadan. Ramadan Study Group.

AIMS: To compare insulin lispro with soluble human insulin in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus fasting during Ramadan, with respect to the rate of hypoglycaemic episodes and postprandial blood glucose values after the main meal after sunset. METHODS: The insulins were compared in an open-label, randomized, cross-over study of 70 outpatients. Hypoglycaemic episodes were recorded by the patients in a self-monitoring diary. Fasting, 1-h and 2-h postprandial blood glucose values were recorded by the patient on three consecutive days at the end of each treatment period. RESULTS: The fasting blood glucose values before sunrise (P>0.4) and after sunset (P>0.6) were similar and did not differ significantly between both treatment groups. The rise in blood glucose after the main meal after sunset was 3.0+/-0.4 mmol/l after 1 h in the insulin lispro treatment group compared to 4.3+/-0.4 mmol/l in the soluble insulin treatment group (P<0.01), and 2.6+/-0.4 mmol/l after 2h with insulin lispro compared to 4.0+/-0.5 mmol/l with soluble insulin (P<0.008). Mean hypoglycaemic episodes per patient over 14 days were 1.3+/-0.1 vs. 2.6+/-0.2, P<0.002, respectively, for insulin lispro and soluble insulin. Most hypoglycaemic episodes occurred during the time period from 6 h after the before sunrise meal until breaking the fast after sunset. CONCLUSIONS: The significantly lower rate of hypoglycaemic episodes combined with better control of postprandial blood glucose suggest insulin lispro may be more suitable prandial insulin for patients treated with Type 2 diabetes who fast during Ramadan.     

Biphasic insulin aspart compared to biphasic human insulin reduces postprandial hyperlipidemia in patients with Type 2 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Premixed insulin analogues reduce postprandial hyperglycemia in patients with Type 2 diabetes in comparison to premixed regular insulin. Insulin also plays an important role in the regulation of postprandial lipid metabolism. It is known that increased levels of postprandial insulin reduce postprandial hyperlipemia but, on the other hand, no information exists with regard to the possible effect of insulin analogues in comparison to human insulin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 12 subjects (3 men; age 59 +/- 5 years; BMI 30.5 +/- 5.9 kg/m2, duration of diabetes 9 +/- 1 years, HbA1c 8.33 +/- 1.1 %) already on therapy with premixed insulin were treated either with biphasic human insulin (BHI30) or with biphasic insulin aspart (BIAsp30) (1.3 IU fast acting insulin/12 g KH) in the setting of a standardized test meal. Serum levels of glucose, insulin, C-peptide and triglycerides as well as retinylpalmitate in plasma and chylomicron remnants were determined before and up to 8 hours after the meal. RESULTS: As was to be expected, therapy with BIAsp30 reduced the maximum increase of postprandial glucose from 7.10 +/- 2.00 mmol/l to 5.27 +/- 1.83 mmo/l (p = 0.007) compared to BHI30 insulin. In the same way, the maximum increase of triglycerides (from 2.33 +/- 1.03 to 1.65 +/- 0.69 mmol/l, p = 0.014) was reduced. The AUC 0 - 8 for triglycerides was not significantly influenced (34.20 +/- 19.86 vs. 31.46 +/- 16.21 mmol x 8 h/l) but the incremental area over baseline (AOB 0 - 8) was significantly reduced from 8.02 +/- 4.35 to 6.12 +/- 3.94 mmol x 8 h/l (p = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to conventional human premixed insulin the prandial therapy with biphasic insulin aspart results not only in an improvement of glucose tolerance but also in a significant reduction of postprandial hyperlipemia.     

Effect of high protein and fat diet on postprandial blood glucose levels in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes in Cairo,Egypt

Background and aimsTo determine the effect of high protein and high fat meals on post prandial glycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes.MethodsThis study included 51 children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes who were following up at Diabetes, Endocrine and Metabolism Pediatric Unit (DEMPU), Abo Elrish Children’s hospital, Cairo University.Post prandial blood glucose levels were recorded and compared following three breakfast meals with varying protein and fat content (standard carbohydrate meal, high fat meal, and high protein meal) over a period of 5 hours on 3 consecutive days.ResultsHigh protein meal resulted in hyperglycemia with the peak level at 3.5 hours and continued for 5 hours post prandial while high fat meal caused early hyperglycemia reached the peak at 2 hours then declined towards 5 hours.Comparison of the three different breakfast meals revealed statistically significant difference regarding the postprandial glycemia at 30, 60, 90,120, 180, 210, 240, 270, 300 min.ConclusionMeals high in protein caused sustained increase in postprandial glucose levels over a period of 5 h. However, high fat meals caused early postprandial hyperglycemia. Protein and fat content of meals affect the timing and values of the peak blood glucose as well as the duration of postprandial hyperglycemia. Therefore, fat/protein unit should be taken in consideration while calculating the bolus insulin dose and anticipating the postprandial glucose response.     

Prandial insulin substitution with insulin lispro or insulin lispro mid mixture vs. basal therapy with insulin glargine: a randomized controlled trial in patients with type 2 diabetes beginning insulin therapy

PURPOSE: To compare the effects of prandial insulin therapy focusing on postprandial glucose control vs. basal insulin therapy focusing on fasting glucose control in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: This was an open-label, randomized, parallel, three-arm multicenter trial in patients with type 2 diabetes starting insulin treatment. Patients (n=159) were randomly assigned to 24-week treatment with 3x daily insulin lispro, 3x daily lispro mid mixture (MidMix; 50% lispro, 50% protaminated lispro), or 1x daily insulin glargine; oral antihyperglycemic agents were discontinued. Primary end point was the postprandial glucose excursion 2 h after breakfast at the end of study. Secondary outcomes included HbA1c, self-monitored blood glucose profiles, hypoglycemic episodes, body weight, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: At the end of study, glucose excursions 2 h after breakfast were significantly lower with lispro and MidMix than with glargine (P<.001 for each vs. glargine): lispro, -0.6+/-2.0 mmol/l; MidMix, +0.8+/-2.4 mmol/l; glargine, +2.5+/-2.4 mmol/l. Fasting glucose decreases were significantly greater with glargine (-2.6+/-2.4 mmol/l) than with lispro or MidMix (-0.9+/-2.2 mmol/l; +0.9+/-1.8 mmol/l). Nevertheless, HbA1c decreased by 1.1% (lispro) and 1.2% (MidMix), vs. 0.3% with glargine. Hypoglycemic episodes were rare with 1-1.5 self-reported episodes per 100 patient-days. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with type 2 diabetes starting insulin, 3x daily prandial treatment with a rapid-acting analog focusing on postprandial glucose values enabled better control of postprandial and circadian blood glucose profiles than once-daily glargine, in spite suboptimal fasting glucose levels, which targets fasting glucose values. These results support studies suggesting that control of postprandial hyperglycemia plays a key role in achieving HbA1c targets.     

Repaglinide improves blood glucose control in sulphonylurea-naive type 2 diabetes

The prandial glucose regulator repaglinide has a rapid onset of action, a short half-life and is metabolised mainly by the liver. Here we report the findings of a 10-week, double-blind, parallel, placebo controlled, randomised trial with repaglinide in 25 diet-treated, sulphonylurea-na?ve patients with Type 2 diabetes. Repaglinide was titrated, based on capillary blood glucose, from 0.5 mg to a maximum of 4 mg, preprandially with breakfast and dinner. After 10 weeks, repaglinide was associated with a decrease in HbA(1c) of 2.3%Hb relative to the placebo group (P=0.018). This reflected a 30% decrease within the repaglinide group from a mean HbA(1c) of 7.0 to 4.9%Hb (P<0.002). Repaglinide was also associated with a decrease in fructosamine, by 0.88 mmol/l, relative to placebo (P<0.001), with a 20% decrease (from 3.80 to 3.04 mmol/l) within the repaglinide group (P<0.001). Fasting and postprandial blood glucose concentrations decreased in association with repaglinide by 3.6 and 6.4 mmol/l, respectively, relative to placebo (P<0.001 in each case). Within the repaglinide group fasting and postprandial blood glucose decreased by 3.9 and 6.2 mmol/l, respectively (P<0.001 in each case). The number of patients reporting hypoglycaemia in the repaglinide group was similar to placebo (15 vs. 20, respectively; NS). Test meal assessments confirmed that repaglinide effectively controls glucose levels by stimulating mealtime insulin secretion. Fasting serum insulin concentration was not raised compared to baseline or placebo during repaglinide therapy, albeit that fasting glucose levels were decreased by repaglinide. Twice-daily meal-related insulin secretagogue therapy with repaglinide, a new short and rapid-acting prandial glucose regulator, is capable of improving all measures of glycaemic control without increased hypoglycaemia or fasting hyperinsulinaemia.     

Premeal insulin lispro plus bedtime NPH or twice-daily NPH in patients with type 2 diabetes: acute postprandial and chronic effects on glycemic control and cardiovascular risk factors

OBJECTIVE: Two insulin regimens were used to explore acute and chronic postprandial changes in glycemia, lipemia, and metabolic markers associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease. METHODS: An open-label, randomized, two-period crossover study (12 weeks/period) compared a prandial regimen [premeal insulin lispro+bedtime neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH)] with a basal regimen (twice-daily NPH). There were 30 patients (12 women and 18 men; mean age=61 years) with type 2 diabetes mellitus (mean duration=16 years) who were randomized after a 2-month lead-in with twice-daily NPH treatment. A standard lunch test meal developed according to each patient's caloric needs was administered at the end of each treatment period. RESULTS: Insulin lispro was associated with significantly lower postprandial glucose (area under the curve0-5 h=43.54 vs. 57.65 mM/h; P<.001), elevated insulin concentrations, and acutely altered lipid fractions that included an early decrease followed by an increase in free fatty acids, lower triglycerides, elevated total cholesterol, elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL), and elevated high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. After 12 weeks of treatment, insulin lispro+bedtime NPH reduced hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c; mean+/-SE=7.6+/-0.2 vs. 8.2+/-0.2%; P<.001) without increasing hypoglycemia or insulin dose as compared with twice-daily NPH. Furthermore, treatment with the prandial insulin regimen resulted in lower total cholesterol, lower LDL cholesterol, and lower oxidized LDL. CONCLUSION: Improved postprandial glycemic control, as observed in a regimen containing both prandial insulin lispro and NPH as the basal insulin, is associated with significantly lower HbA1c and acute modulation of lipid fractions after a test meal. These biochemical modifications may potentially have a favorable impact on cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.     

Addition of rapid-acting insulin to basal insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes: indications and modalities

There are many reasons to believe that in the near future, the treatment of patients with Type 2 diabetes will be characterised by an increased use of insulin therapy. To ensure that insulin regimens are acceptable to patients, and implemented by physicians, they should be as simple and efficient as possible. Simplicity is synonymous with the regimen of once-daily basal insulin glargine given at any time of the day (at the same time each day). With such a strategy, the dose is adjusted by titrating to target fasting blood glucose values of 5.0 - 7.2 mmol/L (90 - 130 mg/dL). When these targets can no longer be achieved with reasonable doses of long-acting insulin, a rapid-acting insulin analogue should be added at meal times. A step-by-step strategy can be used; it is recommended that initially, a single daily prandial bolus of a rapid-acting insulin analogue is administered before the meal that leads to the highest post-meal blood glucose excursions. Further boluses can be added at other meal times as necessary, i.e, when post-meal blood glucose values remain above 10.0 mmol/L (180 mg/dL) and 7.8 mmol/L (140 mg/dL) at mid-morning and 2h-post-lunch or post-dinner times, respectively. This stepwise strategy may eventually lead to a standard basal-bolus regimen with 3 pre-meal injections of rapid-acting insulin analogues, a potentially small trade-off for achieving fairly-well controlled diabetes.     

Post-prandial administration of the insulin analogue insulin aspart in patients with Type 1 diabetes mellitus.

AIMS: In intensified insulin therapy, the recent development of short-acting insulin analogues with a very rapid onset of action forces a new discussion in terms of the optimal injection-meal interval. This study evaluated prandial glycaemia in patients with Type 1 diabetes following the subcutaneous injection of soluble human insulin (HI) and the insulin analogue insulin aspart (IAsp) at different injection-meal intervals and investigated whether administration of IAsp after the meal might provide satisfactory metabolic control. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, four-period crossover study, 20 Type 1 diabetic patients were investigated. Prandial insulin was administered 15 min before the start of the meal (HI(-15min)), immediately before the meal (HI(0min); IAsp(0min)) and 15 min after the start of the meal (IAsp(+15min)). RESULTS: Plasma glucose excursions from baseline levels during the 4 h (PGexc) were highest with HI(0min) (17.9 mmol.l(-1).h; P < 0.05 vs. other treatments) and were not statistically different for HI(-15min), IAsp(0min) and IAsp(15min) (13.6, 11.9 and 14.2 mmol.l(-1).h, respectively). Maximum concentration of plasma glucose (PGmax) was lowest with IAsp(0min) (11.2 mmol/l; P < 0.05 vs. other treatments). PGmax was comparable with HI(-15min), HI(0min) and IAsp(+15min) (13.3, 14.1 and 13.2 mmol/l, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: With regard to prandial glycaemia IAsp(+15min) is as effective as HI(-5min) and superior to HI(0min). Thus, post-prandial dosing of the insulin analogue IAsp offers an attractive and feasible therapeutic option for well-controlled patients with Type 1 diabetes mellitus.     

Fasting but not postprandial (postmeal) glycemia predicts the risk of death in subjects with coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND: Chronic hyperglycemia plays a role in the pathogenesis of coronary artery disease (CAD); however, the cut-off level beyond which glycemia becomes detrimental is still controversial. Postprandial glycemia may be a stronger CAD risk factor than fasting glycemia in patients without documented heart disease. OBJECTIVES: To identify the contributions of fasting and postprandial glycemia to cardiovascular risk in patients with documented coronary artery disease. METHODS: The Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) registry is a database of 24,958 patients with suspected or proven CAD who underwent cardiac catheterization between 1974 and 1979. Median long-term follow up was 14.7 years (interquartile range 9.8 to 16.2 years). Clinical outcomes were evaluated according to fasting glucose levels and 2 h postprandial (postmeal) plasma glucose (2hPG) levels. A total of 13,176 patients with baseline fasting glucose levels and 1691 patients with 2hPG levels were identified. RESULTS: Impaired fasting glycemia was associated with a 1.2-fold increase in both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 1.23; 95% CI 1.08 to 1.40 for cardiovascular mortality), while undiagnosed diabetes was associated with a 1.5-fold increased risk for the same end points. Postprandial hyperglycemia (2hPG of 7.8 mmol/L to 11.0 mmol/L following an average meal) was not associated with a significant risk of death after adjustment for traditional risk factors or in the presence of fasting glucose of less than 6.1 mmol/L. CONCLUSIONS: In CAD patients, impaired fasting glucose is associated with increased all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, whereas postprandial hyperglycemia following an average meal does not appear to be a risk factor.     

A comparison of insulin lispro Mix25 and human insulin 30/70 in the treatment of type 2 diabetes during Ramadan

OBJECTIVE: To compare insulin lispro Mix25 and human insulin 30/70 with regard to their effect on morning and evening postprandial glucose (PPG) control, and on average daily blood-glucose (BG), in patients with Type 2 diabetes who wish to fast during Ramadan. METHOD: Insulin lispro Mix25 and human insulin 30/70 were compared in an open-label, multicenter, randomised, crossover study involving 151 patients. Each treatment period had a duration of 14 days during which the patients self-monitored their BG before and 2 h after the main meals on any 3 days within the last 5 days of each treatment period. RESULTS: The 2 h PPG excursion following the main evening meal after sunset was significantly lower with insulin lispro Mix25 (3.4+/-2.9 mmol/l) compared with human insulin 30/70 (4.0+/-3.2 mmol/l, P=0.007). The evening pre-meal fasting BG values were also lower with insulin lispro Mix25 (7.1+/-2.2 mmol/l) versus human insulin 30/70 (7.5+/-2.6 mmol/l, P=0.034). The average daily BG concentration was 9.5+/-2.4 mmol/l during treatment with insulin lispro Mix25 versus 10.1+/-2.5 mmol/l with human insulin 30/70 given in identical doses (P=0.004). CONCLUSION: When compared with human insulin 30/70, treatment of insulin-requiring Type 2 patients with insulin lispro Mix25 during Ramadan resulted in better average daily glycaemia, and better BG control before and after the evening meal. Insulin lispro Mix25 should be considered as a therapeutic option during Ramadan.     

The Acute Effect of Preprandial Exogenous and Endogenous Sulphonylurea-stimulated Insulin Secretion on Postprandial Glucose Excursions in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

Sulphonylureas improve glucose tolerance by stimulating insulin secretion. Whether improved glucose tolerance results from enhanced early insulin release or greater total insulin secretion is not clear. Insulin responses to a test meal in Type 2 diabetic subjects with and without a single dose (2.5 mg) of oral and intravenous glipizide were, therefore, measured. Intravenous glipizide enhanced early insulin release more than oral glipizide (134% and 80% vs control; p<0.01), whereas total insulin release was equally improved (78% and 54% vs control; p<0.01). Despite slight differences in insulin release, there was no difference in glucose tolerance (median area under concentration curve (AUC); 66.6 vs 61.9 mmol × min I^?1; NS). The test meal was repeated after a bolus of intravenous insulin at the beginning of the meal. This allowed comparison of the effect of exogenous and endogenous insulin supply on postprandial glucose excursions. In spite of an early and fivefold larger rise in serum insulin after intravenous administration of the hormone than after intravenous glipizide (725% vs 134%; p<0.01), postprandial glucose was no better than after glipizide (median AUC; 87.8 vs 66.6 mmol × min I^?1; NS). In contrast, glucose tolerance was better after oral glipizide compared to intravenous insulin (median AUC; 61.9 vs 87.8 mmol × min I^?1; p<0.05). In conclusion, the total amount of insulin secreted seems more important than the timing of the insulin release for the postprandial glucose tolerance in Type 2 diabetic subjects. Neither endogenous nor peripheral pre-meal supply of insulin could normalize postprandial glucose excursions in patients with Type 2 diabetes.     

Gastric emptying in Type II (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus before and after therapy readjustment: no influence of actual blood glucose concentration

Aims/hypothesis. Hyperglycaemia that is induced short-term slows gastric emptying in healthy subjects and patients with diabetes mellitus. Little information is available on the impact of longer-lasting, naturally occurring blood glucose increases and their reduction to euglycaemic values. We studied the relation between gastric emptying and pre-prandial and postprandial blood glucose concentrations in patients with Type II (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus and secondary failure to respond to oral hypoglycaemic treatment (a) before readjusting hypoglycaemic therapy and (b) 1 week thereafter.¶Methods. We studied 9 female and 1 male patient (age 60–78 years, BMI 21.9–32.5 kg/m², diabetes duration 3–33 years, HbA_{1 c} 8.8–13.2 %). Gastric emptying of a radiolabelled semisolid 1168 kJ meal was recorded scintigraphically.¶Results. Blood glucose concentration pre-prandial and postprandial was considerably lower subsequent to than before therapy readjustment in all patients (fasting, 7.9 mmol/l ± 1.5 SD vs 11.7 ± 1.7 mmol/l; 60 min postprandial, 11.7 ± 2.0 vs 15.4 ± 2.2 mmol/l). By contrast, gastric emptying was unchanged (residual radioactivity in stomach 50 min postprandial 65.7 ± 14.1 % vs 66.5 ± 12.9 %). There was no relation between emptying and either fasting blood glucose concentration or its postprandial increase.¶Conclusion/interpretation. The data do not support a major impact of actual, longer-lasting, naturally occurring blood glucose concentrations upon the rate of gastric emptying in patients with Type II diabetes. [Diabetologia (1999) 42: 1410–1412]     

Efficacy and safety of nateglinide in type 2 diabetic patients with modest fasting hyperglycemia

Nateglinide is a fast-acting insulin secretion agent that specifically targets postprandial hyperglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes. The recent reduction in the diagnostic criteria for diabetes and improved understanding of the importance of early insulin secretion served as the rationale for this multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, 24-wk study performed in 675 patients with type 2 diabetes but only moderately elevated fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (FPG = 7.0-8.3 mmol/liter) to assess the efficacy and safety of three fixed doses of nateglinide (30, 60, or 120 mg, with meals). A substudy of the effects on early insulin release and prandial glucose excursions following a standardized breakfast was performed in 127 subjects. Nateglinide was well tolerated and elicited a dose-dependent reduction of placebo-adjusted hemoglobin A(1c) (Delta = -0.26 to -0.39%) and FPG (Delta = -0.51 to -0.73 mmol/liter) accompanied by a dose-related increase in suspected hypoglycemic episodes. However, confirmed hypoglycemia occurred in only 5.3% of patients treated with the highest dose, compared with 1.2% in placebo-treated patients (P < 0.05). Nateglinide increased early insulin release and reduced prandial glucose excursions (P < 0.05 vs. placebo). In sum, nateglinide is a safe and effective therapeutic option for treatment of patients with mild to moderate fasting hyperglycemia.     

Chronic hyperglycemia but not glucose variability determines HbA1c levels in well-controlled patients with type 2 diabetes

To determine the relationships between HbA1c, characteristics of hyperglycemia and glycemic variability in well-controlled type 2 diabetes (HbA1c<7.0%), we studied 63 primary-care patients (36 men and 27 women), aged 34-75 years, with type 2 diabetes for 2-32 years using a continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) and standardized meal test (MMT). Duration of hyperglycemia (>8.0 mmol/l), standard deviation score (S.D.-score) and mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE) were analyzed from CGMS data and postprandial glucose during MMT (PPG(MMT)). Patients were hyperglycemic for 5.7h/day (median), experienced 4.1 hyperglycemic episodes/day, and 78% exceeded PPG levels of 8.0 mmol/l. HbA1c, though associated with the extent of hyperglycemia (r=0.40, p<0.001), failed to correlate with S.D.-score and MAGE. Multiple regression analysis demonstrated that HbA1c was predicted only by fasting glucose (R(2)=0.24, p<0.001) but neither by PPG(MMT), duration of hyperglycemia, S.D.-score nor MAGE. CGMS and meal test provide the tools for complete characterization of glycemia in type 2 diabetes. In well-controlled type 2 diabetes, HbA1c correlates with chronic hyperglycemia but not with glucose variability. Our data suggest that chronic sustained hyperglycemia and glucose fluctuations are two independent components of dysglycemia in diabetes.     

Postprandiale Blutglukoseverl?ufe in der (Insulinpumpen-)Therapie des Typ-1-Diabetes

In the treatment of diabetes mellitus type 1 prolonged postprandial hyperglycemia continues to appear after consumption of complex nutrient compositions. The extent and duration of the increase in glucose concentration does not seem to be only due to the supply of carbohydrates. The therapy of type 1 diabetes patients should therefore consider insulin cover for the fat and protein components of a meal as well as carbohydrates to optimize postprandial glucose values. Whether the presented concept for insulin cover of fat and protein in people with diabetes mellitus type 1 with multiple insulin injections is transferable and whether it can lead to improvement in postprandial glucose values even in people with other forms of diabetes needs further investigations.     

A comparison of insulin lispro and buffered regular human insulin administered via continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion pump

This study compared glycemic control achieved with insulin lispro or buffered regular human insulin in patients with Type 1 diabetes treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) using an external insulin pump. In this 24-week multicenter, randomized, two-way crossover, open-label trial, 58 patients on CSII with adequate glycemic control received either insulin lispro or buffered regular human insulin for 12 weeks, followed by the alternate treatment for another 12 weeks. Efficacy and safety measures included hemoglobin A_1c (HbA_1c) at baseline and endpoint, home blood glucose monitoring, hypoglycemia, and frequency of pump catheter occlusion. Patients consumed a standard test meal on three occasions, with determinations of fasting, 1- and 2-h postprandial glucose values. Insulin lispro use was associated with a significantly lower HbA_1c than was buffered regular human insulin (7.41±0.97 vs. 7.65±0.85 mmol/l; P=.004). Fasting serum glucose values before the test meal were similar between the two therapies. The 1-h (11.16±4.29 vs. 13.20±4.68 mmol/l; P=.012) and 2-h (9.64±4.10 vs. 12.53±4.64 mmol/l; P=.001) postprandial glucose concentrations were significantly lower during treatment with insulin lispro. No differences between treatments were observed in basal or bolus insulin doses, weight gain, or the incidence and rate of hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia, or pump occlusions. When used in external pumps, insulin lispro provides better glycemic control than buffered regular human insulin with a similar adverse event profile.     

Optimal glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus: fasting and postprandial glucose in context

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is the consequence of both insulin resistance and impaired insulin secretion. In the progression from normal glucose tolerance to diabetes, postprandial glucose (PPG) levels often rise before fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels increase above 126 mg/dL (7.0 mmol/L). Numerous epidemiologic studies have shown that impaired glucose tolerance is associated with increased risk for macrovascular disease and that isolated postchallenge hyperglycemia is an independent factor for increased mortality. Reducing the risk for microvascular complications by improving glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) levels is well documented. Emerging data now support the relationship between glycemic control and macrovascular disease. Epidemiologic studies documenting postprandial hyperglycemia and the risk for increased mortality suggest that lowering PPG levels might be beneficial. Optimizing both FPG and PPG is important in achieving normal/near-normal glucose levels. Many patients with type 2 diabetes have difficulty attaining the recommended HbA(1c) goal despite normal/near-normal FPG levels; thus, pharmacologic treatment targeting PPG levels may prove beneficial.     

The effect of additional mealtime insulin bolus using an insulin‐to‐protein ratio compared to usual carbohydrate counting on postprandial glucose in those with type 1 diabetes who usually follow a carbohydrate‐restricted diet: A randomized cross‐over trial

This randomized controlled cross‐over study compared postprandial glucose concentrations and incidence of hypoglycaemia for mealtime bolus insulin calculated for both meal protein and carbohydrate content, with ordinary dosing for carbohydrate content alone, in adults with type 1 diabetes who usually follow a carbohydrate‐restricted diet. All 16 participants completed three test meals under each of the two conditions. The primary outcome was the time normalized Area Under the Curve (AUC) of glucose measurements. The mean (SD) AUC glucose concentration for insulin dosing for both protein and carbohydrate was 8.3 (2.1) mmol/L compared with 10.0 (2.2) mmol/L for carbohydrate alone. The difference (95% CI) was ?1.76 mmol/L (?2.87 to ?0.65), P = .003. The mean (SD) glucose concentration ≥ 8.0 mmol/L was 54.8 (32.4)% for dosing for protein and carbohydrate and 73.7 (26.3)% for carbohydrate alone, rate ratio (95% CI) 0.75 (0.62 to 0.89), P = .002. For glucose concentration < 4.0 mmol/L 5.5 (15.1)% and 2.8 (11.7)%; rate ratio (95% CI): 1.97 (0.90 to 4.27), P = .087. Calculating the meal insulin requirements based on the carbohydrate and protein content may have advantages over calculations based on carbohydrate alone. Further studies are required to determine how to best optimize this.     

Basal plus basal-bolus approach in type 2 diabetes

Type 2 diabetes is characterized by insulin resistance and progressive β-cell deterioration. As β-cell function declines, most patients with type 2 diabetes treated with oral agents, in monotherapy or combination, will require insulin therapy. Addition of basal insulin (glargine, detemir, or NPH/neutral protamine lispro insulin) to previous treatment is accepted as the simplest way to start insulin therapy in those patients. But even when basal insulin is adequately titrated, some patients will also need prandial insulin to achieve or maintain individual glycemic targets over time. Starting with premixed insulin is an effective option, but it is frequently associated with increased hypoglycemia risk, fixed meal schedules, and weight gain. As an alternative, a novel approached known as "basal plus strategy" has been developed. This approach considers the addition of increasing injections of prandial insulin, beginning with the meal that has the major impact on postprandial glucose values. Finally, if this is not enough intensification to basal-bolus will be necessary. In reducing hyperglycemia, this modality still remains the most effective option, even in people with type 2 diabetes. This article will review the currently evidence on the basal plus strategy and also its progression to basal-bolus therapy. In addition, practical recommendations to start and adjust basal plus therapy will be provided.     

No acute effect of nateglinide on postprandial lipid and lipoprotein responses in subjects at risk for type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND: To study the acute effect of nateglinide, an insulinotropic agent, on the postprandial triglyceride and lipoprotein responses in subjects at risk for type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Six women and 10 men, with at least one first-degree relative with type 2 diabetes were included (Age: 48 +/- 7 years, BMI: 27.5 +/- 2.8 kg m(-2), P-triglycerides: 1.3 +/- 0.4 mmol L(-1), P-cholesterol: 5.4 +/- 0.6 mmol L(-1), B-glucose: 4.6 +/- 0.3 mmol L(-1)). They each had two 8-h meal tolerance tests with either nateglinide or placebo given 10 min prior to the meals in randomized order. Lipoprotein fractions were separated by density gradient ultracentrifugation. First-phase insulin secretion was assessed by an intravenous glucose tolerance test (300 mg kg(-1) body weight) and insulin sensitivity by a hyperinsulinaemic euglycaemic clamp (40 mU m(-2) min(-1)). RESULTS: The 1-h insulin levels during the meal tolerance test were significantly higher with nateglinide (577 +/- 81 vs 376 +/- 58 pmol L(-1), p < 0.001), as well as the response during the first two hours (IAUC: 41 243 +/- 5844 vs 29 956 +/- 4662 pmol L(-1) min, p < 0.01). Accordingly, nateglinide lowered the 8-h postprandial glucose response by around 60% compared to placebo (p < 0.001). In contrast, no significant lowering was seen in the excursion of postprandial triglycerides in total plasma or lipoprotein fractions. Consistently, the concentration of exogenous (apoB-48) and endogenous (apoB-100) lipoproteins was not reduced by nateglinide. CONCLUSIONS: Acute administration of nateglinide reduces, as expected, the postprandial glucose concentration, but no reduction in triglyceride or lipoprotein responses are seen in subjects at risk for type 2 diabetes.