Efficacy and safety of preseasonal-specific immunotherapy with an aluminium-adsorbed six-grass pollen allergoid

BACKGROUND: The clinical efficacy and safety of a six-grass pollen allergoid has been studied. The advent of more exacting clinical guidelines and a better appreciation of the possible mechanisms of treatment prompted this reappraisal. METHODS: A 2-year double-blind multicentre placebo-controlled phase 3 clinical trial was undertaken in 154 patients suffering symptoms of rhinoconjunctivitis with or without asthma (GINA I or II). Therapy comprised two consecutive preseasonal short-courses of subcutaneous injections using a grass pollen allergoid adsorbed to aluminium hydroxide. RESULTS: A combined symptom and medication score (SMS) was used as the primary end-point for clinical efficacy. SMS from the first year showed a significant difference of 26.6% between the two study groups (P=0.026) and this was improved after the second year when there was a 48.4% difference in SMS between active and placebo treatment in favour of the allergoid (P = 0.018). Highly significant increases in grass pollen allergen-specific IgG1 and IgG4 antibody concentrations were measured in association with active treatment. Allergen tolerance was increased as judged by a conjunctival provocation test and significant improvements in quality of life were documented using a standardized questionnaire. The allergoid was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: The grass pollen allergoid was shown to be safe and clinically efficacious in the management of hay fever with or without asthma (GINA I or II).     

Immunotherapy with an alum-adsorbed Parietaria-pollen allergoid: a 2-year, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

A double-blind, placeo-controlled study was performed in order to confirm the safety, suitability, and efficacy of an alum-adsorbed Parietaria judaica -pollen allergoid, Allergovit®, for allergen-specific immunotherapy. Parietaria pollen is an important cause of pollinosis, particularly in the Mediterranean zone, where it may be encountered for up to 8–9 months of the year. It is an aggressive allergen, and the doses tolerated during immunotherapy are less than those achieved with grass pollen. This factor increases the desirability of using therapeutic preparations with minimal IgE-binding activity, such as allergoids, in order to reduce the risk of side-effects and enable patients to tolerate a higher dose of allergen, thereby increasing the chances of successful specific immunotherapy. Forty patients with rhinitis and/or asthma were allocated at random to active- or placebo-treatment groups at the beginning of the study. All patients received the active preparation during the second year of the study. Immunotherapy was well tolerated by all patients and the incidence of side-effects was low. Treatment resulted in significant reductions in specific cutaneous reactivity and increases in nasal tolerance. A progressive improvement in nasal inspiratory peak flow in association with the immunotherapy indicated a reduction in nasal inflammation. These objective assessments of efficacy endorsed the results from the patients' diary cards, which indicated significant improvements in symptoms and reductions in the use of medication. The immunologic activity of the therapeutic preparation was demonstrated by the induction of a significant specific-IgG antibody response, with increases in IgG4 during the second year of treatment. We conclude that the safety and efficacy of immunotherapy with the Parietaria allergoid make it suitable for consideration in the treatment of patients with Parietaria -pollen-induced rhinitis or asthma.     

Sublingual immunotherapy: a double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial with Parietaria judaica extract standardized in mass units in patients with rhinoconjunctivitis, asthma, or both

BACKGROUND: New routes of administering immunotherapy in respiratory allergy are being studied as an alternative to conventional injective immunotherapy. We carried out a study to evaluate the clinical efficacy and effects of sublingual immunotherapy in patients with Parietaria judaica-induced respiratory allergy. METHODS: A double-blind, placebo-controlled design was followed. Thirty patients with P. judaica rhinoconjunctivitis, mild asthma, or both were randomly chosen for sublingual immunotherapy (14 patients) or placebo treatment (16 patients). The patients underwent preseasonal rush induction treatment followed by coseasonal maintenance treatment during the Parietaria pollen season. Symptom and drug scores, as well as specific IgE and specific IgG4, were recorded. RESULTS: Significantly lower symptom and drug scores were found (P=0.04), especially during the Parietaria pollination period, in the immunotherapy group. No significant difference in specific IgE and specific IgG4 was detected between the active and placebo groups; a statistically significant increase of specific IgE was detected in both groups (P=0.05). No patient undergoing active sublingual immunotherapy reported local or systemic side-effects. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that sublingual immunotherapy is both clinically effective and safe in treating patients with Parietaria-induced rhinoconjunctivitis and mild asthma.     

Sublingual immunotherapy abrogates seasonal bronchial hyperresponsiveness in children with Parietaria-induced respiratory allergy: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The use of immunotherapy in asthmatic children is still controversial. Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) may represent an advance, due to the good safety profile, but little is known about its effects on lung function and nonspecific bronchial responsiveness. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the effects of SLIT on these parameters, in children with Parietaria pollen-induced asthma. METHODS: Thirty children with asthma solely due to Parietaria who participated in a previous randomized, placebo-controlled trial with SLIT were studied: pulmonary function test and methacholine challenge were carried out at baseline in winter 1999 (out season), during the 1999 season (before randomization), and during the 2001 season. RESULTS: Before randomization, there was a significant fall in methacholine provocation concentration during the pollen season vs baseline in both groups (SLIT group 9.78 +/- 5.95 mg/ml vs 3.37 +/- 2.99 mg/ml; placebo 8.70 +/- 6.25 mg/ml vs 2.44 +/- 2.25 mg/ml; P =.005). In the second pollen season, the response to methacholine returned to baseline values in the active group (9.10 +/- 7.7 mg/ml; P = NS vs baseline), whereas in the placebo group a significant increase in reactivity was still present (2.46 +/- 2.26; P = 0.008 vs baseline). No significant difference in FEV(1) and FEF(25-75) between the two groups was observed at all times. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that SLIT abrogates the seasonal bronchial hyperreactivity in children with asthma due to Parietaria. This may be regarded as an indirect evidence of the effect on bronchial inflammation.     

A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of immunotherapy with an alginate-conjugated extract of Parietaria Judaica in patients with Parietaria hay fever

A double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy (IT) with a partially purified alginate-conjugated extract of Parietaria judaica (Conjuvac® Parietaria , Dome/Hollister-Stier) in patients suffering from rhinoconjunctivitis caused by Parietaria pollen. Eighteen patients (10 women, 8 men, mean age 35 years) received active treatment and 17 (10 women, 7 men, mean age 42.5 years) received placebo. Actively treated patients had significantly lower nasal symptom/medication scores (running nose P = 0.0087 and sneezing P = 0.048) during the Parietaria pollen season. Significant decreases in specific skin ( P > 0.01), nasal ( P > 0.05), and conjunctival ( P > 0.01) reactivity to the Parietaria extract and significant increases of specific IgG ( P > 0.001), IgGI ( P > 0.001), and IgG4 ( P > 0.001) in actively treated patients, but not in placebo, were found. IT was well tolerated, the active extract inducing five mild systemic reactions (four rhinitis and one urticaria) and placebo two (rhinitis). A significant correlation was found between low skin reactivity and high specific IgG ( P = 0.0002) and IgG4 ( P = 0.036). These findings indicate that IT with a partially purified P. judaica extract is an effective and safe treatment for Parietaria pollen allergy. The correlation between low immediate skin reactivity and high specific IgG and IgG4 suggests that, at least in the studied cutaneous model, these antibodies may exert a blocking effect.     

Randomized controlled trials define shape of dose response for Pollinex Quattro Birch allergoid immunotherapy

Background

The Birch Allergoid, Tyrosine Adsorbate, Monophosphoryl Lipid A (POLLINEX^® Quattro Plus 1.0 ml Birch 100%) is an effective, well‐tolerated short course subcutaneous immunotherapy. We performed 2 phase II studies to determine its optimal cumulative dose.

Methods

The studies were conducted in Germany, Austria and Poland (EudraCT numbers: 2012‐004336‐28 PQBirch203 and 2015‐000984‐15 PQBirch204) using a wide range of cumulative doses. In both studies, subjects were administered 6 therapy injections weekly outside the pollen season. Conjunctival Provocation Tests were performed at screening, baseline and 3‐4 weeks after completing treatment, to quantify the reduction in Total Symptom Scores (as the primary endpoint) with each cumulative dose. Multiple Comparison Procedure and Modeling analysis was used to test for the dose response, shape of the curve and estimation of the median effective dose (ED₅₀), a measure of potency.

Results

Statistically significant dose responses (P < .01 & .001) were seen, respectively. The highest cumulative dose in PQBirch204 (27 300 standardized units [SU]) approached a plateau. Potency of the PQBirch was demonstrated by an ED₅₀ 2723 SU, just over half the current dose. Prevalence of treatment‐emergent adverse events was similar for active doses, most being short‐lived and mild. Compliance was over 85% in all groups.

Conclusion

Increasing the cumulative dose of PQBirch 5.5‐fold from 5100 to 27 300 SU achieved an absolute point difference from placebo of 1.91, a relative difference 32.3% and an increase in efficacy of 50%, without compromising safety. The cumulative dose response was confirmed to be curvilinear in shape.     

Preseasonal local allergoid immunotherapy to grass pollen in children: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial

BACKGROUND: We assessed the efficacy of preseasonal local allergoid immunotherapy in a group of children with asthma and/or rhinitis and/or rhinoconjunctivitis due to grass pollen. METHODS: We randomly assigned 24 children allergic to grass pollen to receive local allergoid immunotherapy for 3 months before the pollen season and 24 such patients to receive identically appearing placebo. The immunotherapy consisted of tablets of monomeric allergoid grass pollen allergens held in the mouth until they dissolved and then swallowed. The study was double-blind. Symptoms and medications were scored on diary cards during the pollen season. Nasal eosinophil cationic protein levels were measured by the monoclonal antibodies EG1 and EG2 outside the pollen season and at low and at high pollen concentration during the pollen season. RESULTS: The active-treatment group had a statistically significant reduction of total symptoms (P<0.05), especially bronchial symptoms (P<0.05), in comparison with the placebo group. Immunotherapy was well tolerated and compliance was good. Nasal levels of EG2 and EG1 increased significantly during the pollen season, but there was no difference between groups. EG2/EG1 increased significantly only in the placebo group during natural allergen exposure (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that this immunotherapy is effective for the treatment of asthma due to grass pollen in children.     

Randomized double-blind controlled study with sublingual carbamylated allergoid immunotherapy in mild rhinitis due to mites

BACKGROUND: The clinical efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) in mite allergy and in mild disease is still a matter of debate, thus we performed a long-term clinical trial. METHODS: The study was randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled. After a 1-year assessment, 68 patients with mild rhinitis with/without asthma due to mites were randomized to drugs + placebo or drugs + SLIT for 2 years. Sublingual immunotherapy was given as soluble tablets of monomeric carbamylated allergoid. Clinical scores for asthma and rhinitis (0, absent to 3, severe) and drug consumption were assessed by diary card in the period November-February. Quality of life was assessed before and after each observation period and pharmaco-economy data were evaluated as well. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients completed the study. The rate of dropouts was similar in the two groups. No relevant side effect was reported. There was a significant reduction of total clinical scores (P < 0.05) in the active group vs placebo at the first year, but not at the second whereas nasal obstruction significantly improved in both years (P < 0.05). The reduction of drug intake score was significant only at the first year. No change was observed concerning most of the Short Form-36 items, because at baseline all patients displayed a normal profile. A significant change in SLIT group was seen for the item 'change in health status'. The need for extra visits was significantly lower in the active group (25%vs 43%). CONCLUSIONS: Sublingual immunotherapy was clinically effective and safe in mite-induced mild disease.     

Efficacy,safety, and immunological effects of a 2‐year immunotherapy with Depigoid® birch pollen extract: a randomized,double‐blind,placebo‐controlled study

Background Rhinoconjunctivitis due to birch pollen sensitization is common in Northern Europe. A depigmented polymerized birch pollen extract – Depigoid^® has been developed for immunotherapy. Objective To evaluate its clinical efficacy, safety, and effects on immunological parameters. Methods Sixty‐one patients aged 7–69 years were included in a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial of subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) using depigmented polymerized birch pollen extract. SCIT consisted of four increasing doses at 7‐day intervals, followed by maintenance injections of 500 DPP (corresponding to 30 μg Bet v1 before depigmentation) at 6‐week intervals for 18 months. The primary outcome was the combined symptom and medication score during the 2006 birch pollen season. The frequency of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC)producing IL‐4, IL‐10, IL‐12, and IL‐13 was assessed in a subgroup of patients by ELISPOT assay. Results After 18 months of treatment, the median combined symptom and medication score (upper/lower quartile) of treated patients was significantly lower than those on placebo: 8.0 (5.8–10.3) and 12.6 (8.6–16.2), respectively (P=0.004). Systemic reactions occurred in 29 patients (12 active, 17 placebo), were grades 1 or 2, and none required specific treatment. After 18 months of treatment, mean serum concentrations of specific IgE increased significantly in both groups (P<0.0001) whereas serum concentrations of both specific IgG1 and IgG4 only increased significantly in the SCIT group (P=0.002) and not in the placebo group. The seasonal increase in numbers of IL‐4‐ and IL‐13‐producing PBMC was blunted by immunotherapy. Conclusions SCIT with depigmented polymerized birch pollen extract significantly reduced symptom and medication scores when compared with the placebo, was well tolerated, and resulted in immunological changes comparable with those of native pollen extracts. Cite this as: A.‐S. Höiby, V. Strand, D.S. Robinson, A. Sager and S. Rak, Clinical & Experimental Allergy, 2010 (40) 1062–1070.     

Clinical and immunological effects of immunotherapy with alum-absorbed grass allergoid in grass-pollen-induced hay fever

A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of immunotherapy was conducted in 19 patients with grass-pollen hay fever to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a formalinized depot grass allergoid. The patients were assessed before and during IT by clinical (symptom-medication scores during the grass- pollen season, specific nasal and skin reactivity) and immunological (specific IgE, IgG, IgG₁ and IgG₄ antibodies) parameters. High doses of grass allergoid, corresponding to a cumulative pre-seasonal dosage of 46050 PNU, were administered, with only one systemic reaction. The actively treated patients had significantly lower symptom-medication scores than placebo ( p < 0.01) during the month of May and showed a significant decrease in specific skin ( p < 0.01) and nasal ( p < 0.05) reactivity, and a significant early increase in specific IgE ( p < 0.01), IgG ( p < 0.0005), IgG₁ ( p < 0.001) and IgG₄ ( p < 0.05), with a subsequent decrease of IgE and IgG₁. No differences were detected in any of these parameters in the placebo group. A correlation was found between high IgG₄/IgG₁ ratio and the specific skin reactivity decrease (r = 0.691, p < 0.05), whereas a high IgG₄/IgG₁, ratio was associated with higher symptom-medication scores (r = 0.654, p < 0.05). Possible explanations of these apparent discrepancies are proposed.     

Pharmacokinetics of an allergen and a monomeric allergoid for oromucosal immunotherapy in allergic volunteers

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Little is known about the pharmacokinetics of allergens for local immunotherapy. Thus, we studied the pharmacokinetics in allergic volunteers of a commercial allergenic vaccine in orosoluble tablets (LAIS(R), Lofarma S.p.A). METHODS: The carbamylated monomeric allergoid derived from Parietaria judaica major allergen (Par j 1), characterized by maintenance of the original molecular size, and the native allergen, were radiolabelled with 123I, then incorporated into the commercial soluble tablets and administered to allergic subjects. Early sequential and late static scintigraphic acquisitions were performed, and plasma radioactivity was measured at different time intervals. RESULTS: No difference in local pharmacokinetics was observed between the allergen and the allergoid: part of the tracer was retained in the mouth for at least 2 h after swallowing. No direct absorption through the oral mucosa could be detected, as plasma radioactivity increased only after swallowing and peaked at 2 h. However, the plasma peak attained with the allergoid in tablets was significantly higher with respect to the native allergen. Finally, some undegraded allergoid, but not the allergen, could be constantly detected in the bloodstream at plasma peak. CONCLUSIONS: The results showed a similar behaviour of the allergoid and the allergen in tablets as far as their local kinetics are concerned, whereas plasma peak was higher with the allergoid than with the allergen. Therefore we conclude that the chemical modification of the allergen may affect its pharmacokinetics, by making it less susceptible to enzymatic degradation.     

Clinical, functional, and immunologic effects of sublingual immunotherapy in birch pollinosis: a 3-year randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND: Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) has been proved effective in allergic rhinitis, but there are few studies assessing its effects on inflammation and on the lower airways. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate at the same time the effects of SLIT on rhinitis symptoms, nasal inflammation, and lower airways function in patients with birch pollinosis. METHODS: Adult patients with rhinitis and asthma monosensitized to birch were evaluated during a run-in pollen season and then randomized to receive openly either drugs alone or drugs plus SLIT and reevaluated in the subsequent 4 pollen seasons. Rhinitis symptoms and consumption of bronchodilators were assessed by means of diary card. A nasal smear for eosinophil count was carried out in and out of pollen seasons, and pulmonary function tests with methacholine challenge were performed at each season. RESULTS: Of 79 enrolled patients, 27 dropped out, with a significantly higher rate of dropouts in the control group. There was a decrease in symptoms and bronchodilator use in the SLIT group versus the control group, becoming significant at the second and third pollen seasons, respectively ( P < .01 at all times). Nasal eosinophils decreased significantly in the active group, starting from the third pollen season ( P < .01). In the SLIT group a significant increase in FEV 1 , specific airways conductance, and maximal expiratory flow at 25% of forced vital capacity was seen starting from the second year and was associated with an increase in the methacholine threshold dose ( P < .01). The differences were significant also at the intragroup comparison over time. CONCLUSION: SLIT achieved a significant clinical benefit in birch pollinosis, reduced the eosinophil infiltration in nasal mucosa, and significantly improved pulmonary function during the pollen seasons.     

Clinical and immunologic effects of a rush sublingual immunotherapy to Parietaria species: A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The local (noninjection) routes of immunotherapy are presently regarded as viable therapeutic options for respiratory allergy, and their mechanisms of action are currently undergoing investigation. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the clinical efficacy of a preseasonal rush sublingual-swallow immunotherapy and its effects on allergic inflammation in patients with seasonal rhinoconjunctivitis caused by Parietaria species. METHODS: Thirty patients with Parietaria species-induced rhinoconjunctivitis (13 with mild intermittent asthma) were randomly assigned sublingual-swallow immunotherapy or placebo in a rush preseasonal course. We assessed the seasonal symptom-drug intake score by diary card and the inflammatory infiltration and the intercellular adhesion molecule 1 expression on nasal epithelium after specific allergenic challenge before and after treatment. RESULTS: The investigated immunotherapy was well tolerated, and no side effects were recorded. A significant reduction of the symptom score (P =.016) and drug intake score (P =. 008) after immunotherapy was observed only in the active group. A decrease of the cumulative score was observed also in the placebo group (P =.046), but the significance was clearly higher (P =.006) in the active group. In the active group a reduction of neutrophils (P =.001), eosinophils (P =.01), and intercellular adhesion molecule 1 expression (P =.04) after specific nasal challenge was also detected. CONCLUSION: The present results suggest that this sublingual-swallow immunotherapy administered through a rush schedule is clinically effective and safe and that it decreases the immune-mediated inflammatory responses to the allergen.     

A randomized,double‐blind,placebo‐controlled,dose‐finding trial with Lolium perenne peptide immunotherapy

Background

A novel subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy formulation (gpASIT+?) containing Lolium perenne peptides (LPP) and having a short up‐dosing phase has been developed to treat grass pollen–induced seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. We investigated peptide immunotherapy containing the hydrolysate from perennial ryegrass allergens for the optimum dose in terms of clinical efficacy, immunogenicity and safety.

Methods

This prospective, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, phase IIb, parallel, four‐arm, dose‐finding study randomized 198 grass pollen–allergic adults to receive placebo or cumulative doses of 70, 170 or 370 μg LPP. All patients received weekly subcutaneous injections, with the active treatment groups reaching assigned doses within 2, 3 and 4 weeks, respectively. Efficacy was assessed by comparing conjunctival provocation test (CPT) reactions at baseline, after 4 weeks and after completion. Grass pollen–specific immunoglobulins were analysed before and after treatment.

Results

Conjunctival provocation test (CPT) response thresholds improved from baseline to V7 by at least one concentration step in 51.2% (170 μg; P = .023), 46.3% (370 μg), and 38.6% (70 μg) of patients receiving LPP vs 25.6% of patients receiving placebo (modified per‐protocol set). Also, 39% of patients in the 170‐μg group became nonreactive to CPT vs 18% in the placebo group. Facilitated allergen‐binding assays revealed a highly significant (P < .001) dose‐dependent reduction in IgE allergen binding across all treatment groups (70 μg: 17.1%; 170 μg: 18.8%; 370 μg: 26.4%). Specific IgG₄ levels increased to 1.6‐fold (70 μg), 3.1‐fold (170 μg) and 3.9‐fold (370 μg) (mPP).

Conclusion

Three‐week immunotherapy with 170 μg LPP reduced CPT reactivity significantly and increased protective specific antibodies.

     

Impact of sublingual immunotherapy on seasonal asthma and skin reactivity in children allergic to Parietaria pollen treated with inhaled fluticasone propionate

BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy is a recognized treatment for allergic respiratory diseases. OBJECTIVE: To study the usefulness of immunotherapy in combination with optimal pharmacological therapy. METHODS: Thirty-eight children (8-14 years) suffering from seasonal asthma+/-rhinoconjunctivitis due to Parietaria poorly controlled by anti-allergic drugs treatment were selected. After randomization according to a double-blind placebo-controlled design they received active sublingual immunotherapy (15 children) or placebo (15 children) for 13 months combined with inhaled fluticasone twice a day during the pollen season. Eight children were taken as control, whereas all patients were instructed to take symptomatic drugs on need. Early and late skin response to the allergen were assessed in all patients before and after treatment. Drug and symptom scores, as well as visual analogue scores (VASs) and Parietaria pollen counts were assessed during the pollen season. RESULTS: Groups were well balanced for age, gender, early and late skin response before treatment. Four children dropped out, in one case in relationship with active sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) administration. Chest and nose symptoms, as well as drug scores and VASs were significantly better in both the active or placebo SLIT+fluticasone (S+F) as compared to the control group (P between <0.001 and 0.043). Eye symptoms were significantly better in the active S+F group as compared to control (P=0.025). The VASs were significantly better in the active S+F group as compared to the placebo S+F group (P=0.037). The early skin response decreased significantly in the active S+F group (P<0.001), whereas the late skin response changed significantly in all groups, with an increase in the placebo+fluticasone group (P=0.019) and in the control group (P=0.037) and a decrease (P<0.0001) in the active S+F group. CONCLUSION: The clinical efficacy of S+F is equal to that of fluticasone alone, but the addition of SLIT has effects also on non-bronchial symptoms.     

Tolerance and immunological changes of chemically modified allergen vaccine of Parietaria judaica in accelerated schedules

The physicochemical modification of allergen vaccines provides a chance for administering higher doses in a shorter period of time. We sought to assess the safety and immunological changes of using a biologically standardized and modified Parietaria judaica pollen extract in accelerated schedules. Two accelerated schedules were tested in 45 P. judaica-allergic patients: 20 patients reached the maximum dose after two visits using two different concentrations and 25 patients reached the maximum dose after only one visit with two injections of the maximum concentration vial. The tolerance was assessed by recording all side effects related with immunotherapy. Specific antibody levels against native extract and rPar j 2 allergen were evaluated at the beginning and the end of the study. Allergenic potency determined by enzyme allergosorbent test (EAST) inhibition and skin prick test showed that modified P. judaica pollen had a 99.9% less allergenicity than native extract. After 650 doses administered, two clinically irrelevant local reactions (diameter<0 x 5 cm) and no systemic reactions were registered. Significant increases in allergen-specific IgG4 and IgG against P. judaica extract and rPar j 2 and significant decrease of specific IgE against Par j 2 were observed. The modified extract of P. judaica is safe to treat sensitive patients, even at accelerated regimens, and induces significant immunological changes.