Carcinoma of unknown primary site: sequential treatment with paclitaxel/carboplatin/etoposide and gemcitabine/irinotecan: a Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network phase II trial

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of the sequential administration of paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Princeton, NJ), carboplatin (Paraplatin; Bristol-Myers Squibb), and oral etoposide (VePesid; Bristol-Myers Squibb) followed by gemcitabine (Gemzar; Eli Lilly; Indianapolis, IN) and irinotecan (Campostar; Pfizer Pharmaceuticals; New York, NY) in the first-line treatment of patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred thirty-two patients were treated with sequential combination chemotherapy for a maximum of six cycles. All patients had relatively poor prognostic features. Fifty-nine patients had well-differentiated adenocarcinoma, 73 patients had poorly differentiated carcinoma, and 121 patients had performance status scores of 0 or 1. RESULTS: Thirty-three (30%) of 111 assessable patients (95% confidence interval 27%-33%) had objective responses to treatment (26 partial responses, seven complete responses). The combination of gemcitabine and irinotecan was associated with significantly less toxicity than the triple-drug regimen and improved the responses in several patients (10%). The response rates were similar in the two major histologic tumor types, but were lower for patients with liver-dominant tumors (13%) and higher for patients with lymph-node-dominant tumors (50%). The median progression-free survival time, median survival time, and actuarial survival rates at 1 and 2 years were 5.7 months, 9.1 months, 35%, and 16%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Sequential combination chemotherapy with paclitaxel/carboplatin/oral etoposide and gemcitabine/irinotecan is an active treatment for patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site, but overall toxicities are greater than those seen with other combinations of new drugs and survival appears similar to that observed in 264 other patients treated in our four previous phase II trials. A better understanding of the biology of these heterogeneous tumors will likely lead to improved therapy for these patients.     

Gemcitabine, carboplatin, and paclitaxel for patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site: a Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of the novel chemotherapy combination that includes gemcitabine, carboplatin, and paclitaxel in the treatment of patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred twenty patients were treated with the following regimen, administered every 21 days for a planned four courses: gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) intravenously (i.v.) on days 1 and 8, carboplatin at an estimated area under the concentration-time curve of 5 mg min/mL i.v. on day 1, and paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2) i.v. on day 1. After four courses, stable and responding patients were given weekly paclitaxel 70 mg/m(2) i.v. for 6 weeks for three 8-week courses. All patients had relatively poor prognostic features. Sixty-three patients had well-differentiated adenocarcinoma, 56 patients had poorly differentiated carcinoma, and 104 patients had performance status of 0 or 1. RESULTS: Twenty-eight (25%) of 113 assessable patients (95% confidence interval, 22% to 30%) had major objective responses to treatment. Response rates were similar in the two major histologic types. Response rate did not seem to be improved by continued therapy with weekly paclitaxel. The median progression-free survival time was 6 months. Median survival for the entire group was 9 months, and the actuarial survival at 1 and 2 years was 42% and 23%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine, carboplatin, and paclitaxel followed by weekly paclitaxel is an active and tolerable treatment for patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site. The survival seen in this poor-prognosis group of patients in this multicenter community-based trial is notable and similar to other taxane-based regimens for these patients. Study of additional combinations or sequences of newer drugs, as well as the exploration of targeted biologic agents for patients with an identified target in their tumors, is warranted.     

Management of patients with cancer of unknown primary site

Cancer of unknown primary site represents approximately 3% to 5% of all new cancer diagnoses. Adenocarcinomas account for 60% of all unknown primary cancers and poorly differentiated carcinomas or adenocarcinomas, for 30%. Historically, the prognosis for most patients with unknown primary tumors has been poor, with survival often less than 6 months from diagnosis. Recent advances in diagnostic techniques, including immunocytochemical and molecular genetic methods, have increased the probability of identifying a likely underlying tumor type. Based on clinical and pathologic features, approximately 40% of patients can be categorized within subsets for which specific treatment has been defined. Empiric therapy is an option for the remaining 60% of patients. In these patients, favorable prognostic factors for treatment response include tumor location in lymph nodes, fewer sites of metastases, younger age, and poorly differentiated carcinoma histology. Although experience remains limited, the incorporation of a taxane into empiric regimens appears to improve response rates and survival. A recent study of paclitaxel (Taxol), carboplatin (Paraplatin), and etoposide in 55 patients with cancer of unknown primary site reported an overall response rate of 47% and a median overall survival of 13.4 months. Investigations continue to explore new diagnostic techniques and novel therapeutic approaches.     

Phase II trial of paclitaxel,estramustine, etoposide,and carboplatin in the treatment of patients with hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Preclinical data suggest that the combination of intravenous (i.v.) paclitaxel, carboplatin, oral etoposide, and oral estramustine (TEEC) has significant activity in patients with advanced, hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma. The authors conducted this clinical trial to evaluate the addition of carboplatin to the three-drug combination of paclitaxel, estramustine, and etoposide (TEE). METHODS: Twenty patients with carcinoma of the prostate that was progressing despite hormone therapy were enrolled on this Phase II trial. Patients were treated with oral estramustine, 280 mg three times daily, and oral etoposide, 50 mg/m2, once daily on Days 1-7, with i.v. paclitaxel, 135 mg/m2, over 1 hour followed by carboplatin (area under the curve, 5) on Day 2 of each 21-day treatment cycle. Patients were evaluated for response after three cycles, and three additional cycles were given to responding or stable patients. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were evaluable for response, and 12 patients had measurable disease at baseline. The measurable response rate was 58% (7 of 12 patients; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 28-85%), and all of those were partial responses. Eleven patients had decreases >50% from their baseline prostate specific antigen levels during therapy, for a response rate of 58% (95% CI, 34-80%) by this criterion. The median time to disease progression was 5.5 months, with a median survival of 14.2 months. Major toxicities included Grade (according to version 2 of the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria) 4 neutropenia in 4 patients, Grade 4 thrombocytopenia in 4 patients, and anemia > or = Grade 3 in 4 patients. One patient had a deep vein thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of TEEC was active in patients with hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma. The regimen was tolerable, with primarily hematologic toxicity. The addition of carboplatin to TEE did not appear to add to the efficacy of the three-drug combination of antimicrotubule agents.     

Induction paclitaxel and carboplatin for patients with head and neck carcinoma. Analysis of 62 patients treated between 1994 an 1999

BACKGROUND: After standard therapy for advanced head and neck carcinoma, 5-year survival rate is less than 50%. Our purpose was to develop a new treatment for advanced head and neck carcinoma by using preoperative chemotherapy. Long term efficacy and toxicity of induction paclitaxel and carboplatin is reported here. METHODS: Between 1994 and 1999, 62 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed head and neck carcinoma were treated with paclitaxel and carboplatin induction chemotherapy. Chemotherapy was administered every 21 days with 3 courses of paclitaxel (150-265 mg/m(2)) and carboplatin at a dose calculated using the Calvert formula area under the curve of 7.5. Patients who achieved complete or partial response at the primary received definitive radiation to the primary tumor and those with lymph node disease received neck dissection followed by radiation to the regional lymph nodes. Nonresponders received standard resection of primary tumor and draining lymph node basin followed by radiation. RESULTS: Sixty-two consecutive patients were treated. Seventy-four percent had Stage IV (according to the 5th edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging manual) disease. The median duration of follow-up from initiation of chemotherapy was 64 weeks (range, 1-272 weeks). Overall complete plus partial response rate was 41 of 62 (66%). Responses were observed at all anatomic sites: oropharynx 20 of 33 (61%); hypopharynx 8 of 12 (67%); and larynx 13 of 17 (76%). Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall survival (OS), at 230 weeks, were significantly better in Stage IV oropharynx/hypopharynx responders than nonresponders (55% vs. 27%; P = 0.04). Of the variables evaluated in multivariate models, response at the primary tumor and lymph nodes were associated with improved disease free survival and OS. Organ preservation was achieved in 28 of 62 (45%) of patients at all anatomic sites: oropharynx 39%, hypopharynx 42%, larynx 59%. Seventeen of 28 (61%) patients had their primary organ site preserved for a mean duration of 78 weeks (range, 13-238 weeks). CONCLUSIONS: Induction paclitaxel and carboplatin was well tolerated. The response rate was encouraging considering most patients were Stage IV. Chemotherapy response identified a group with improved prognosis. Organ preservation was possible at all anatomic sites.     

Cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy in the treatment of poorly differentiated carcinoma and poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma of unknown primary site: results of a 12-year experience.

PURPOSE: We previously reported excellent responses to cisplatin-based chemotherapy in a minority of patients with poorly differentiated carcinoma (PDC) or poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (PDA) of unknown primary site. We have continued to study and to treat these patients, and now report clinical characteristics, treatment results, and prognostic factors in a large group of patients identified prospectively. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between February 1978 and December 1989, we treated 220 patients with PDC or PDA of unknown primary site. The median age was 39 years; 48% of patients had predominant tumor location in the mediastinum, retroperitoneum, or peripheral lymph nodes. Specialized pathologic studies resulted in the identification of specific tumor types in only a few cases. All patients received cisplatin-based chemotherapy; between 1978 and 1984, 116 patients received cisplatin, vinblastine, and bleomycin (PVeB) +/- doxorubicin, and 104 patients treated since January 1985 received cisplatin and etoposide +/- bleomycin. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-eight patients (63%) had objective responses to therapy, and 58 (26%) had complete response. Thirty-six patients (16%) are currently disease-free at a median of 61 months following therapy (range, 11 to 142 months). Actuarial 10-year survival is 16%. Favorable prognostic factors identified by Cox regression analysis include: (1) predominant tumor location in the retroperitoneum or peripheral lymph nodes, (2) tumor limited to one or two metastatic sites, (3) no history of cigarette use, and (4) younger age. CONCLUSION: Patients with PDC or PDA of unknown primary site represent another group of patients for whom potentially curative therapy is available. Patients with this syndrome should be distinguished from patients with well-differentiated adenocarcinoma of unknown primary site, and should receive a trial of cisplatin-based chemotherapy.     

Paclitaxel,carboplatin, and topotecan in the treatment of patients with small cell lung cancer: a phase II trial of the Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, toxicity, and efficacy of a novel three-drug regimen containing paclitaxel, carboplatin, and topotecan followed by oral etoposide in the first-line treatment of patients with small cell lung carcinoma. METHODS: One hundred five patients with previously untreated, limited stage or extensive stage small cell lung carcinoma were treated in this multicenter, community-based, Phase II trial. All patients received paclitaxel 135 mg/m(2) by 1-hour intravenous (i.v.) infusion on Day 1, carboplatin at an area under the serum concentration-time curve of 5.0 i.v. on Day 1, and topotecan 0.75 mg/ m(2) i.v. on Days 1-3. The treatment regimen was repeated at 21-day intervals for 4 courses. Patients with limited stage disease also received radiation therapy (45 grays [Gy]; in single daily fractions of 1.8 Gy) beginning concurrently with the third course of chemotherapy. Patients who had an objective response or stable disease after 4 courses of combined paclitaxel, carboplatin, and topotecan then received 3 courses of oral etoposide (50 mg alternating with 100 mg for 10 consecutive days) repeated at 21-day intervals. RESULTS: Treatment with paclitaxel, carboplatin, and topotecan produced response rates of 88% and 93% in patients with extensive stage disease and limited stage disease, respectively. The median survival for patients with extensive stage and limited stage disease was 8.3 months and 17.2 months, respectively. The addition of oral etoposide was feasible, but there was no suggestion that it prolonged remission. This three- drug regimen was associated with acceptable toxicity in patients with a good performance status, although it was tolerated very poorly by patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2; 5 of 12 patients (42%) had treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Although this three-drug regimen was active in the treatment of patients with small cell lung carcinoma, it was more toxic than standard platinum and etoposide regimens and provided no apparent improvement in efficacy. Further investigation of topotecan as a component of first-line therapy should focus on two-drug combination regimens in which the topotecan dose can be optimized. Routine use of three-drug regimens in patients with small cell lung carcinoma should await demonstration of superiority in randomized trials.     

High dose radiation therapy and chemotherapy as induction treatment for stage III nonsmall cell lung carcinoma

BACKGROUND: The current study was conducted to review the authors' experience in treating consecutive patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer (1997 revision) Stage III nonsmall cell lung carcinoma with aggressive preoperative chemoradiation followed by surgical resection. METHODS: The records of all patients who received preoperative chemoradiation were evaluated. Patients received 2 cycles of concurrent cisplatin and etoposide with 5940 centigrays of radiation therapy. They then were reevaluated to determine whether they were surgical candidates. If so, resection of the primary tumor with mediastinal lymph node dissection was performed 4-6 weeks after the completion of preoperative treatment. After adequate healing, an additional four cycles of cisplatin/etoposide or carboplatin/paclitaxel was given. RESULTS: Forty-two patients received preoperative chemoradiation, 33 of whom underwent surgical resection (79%), including 9 patients who underwent pneumonectomies. Complete pathologic responses were observed in 27% of these patients. Postoperative complications were noted in 21% of the patients and included persistent air leak, supraventricular arrhythmia, and empyema. There were no reported treatment-related deaths. The median follow-up was 26 months. The overall 5-year survival rate for all patients was 36.5% and was 45. 3% for patients who underwent resection. A trend toward increased 5-year survival was observed in patients who had a complete pathologic response (57.1%). Univariate analysis revealed the N stage classification to be significant for predicting a complete response. Patterns of failure revealed the brain to be the most common site of first recurrence (50%) and the only site of recurrence in 36% of patients. There was only one case of local failure. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative chemoradiation using high radiation doses is feasible with acceptable toxicity. The results of the current study suggest an increased complete pathologic response rate and increased overall survival rate compared with reports in the published literature.     

Paclitaxel, carboplatin, and gemcitabine in the treatment of patients with advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium

BACKGROUND: The objective of the current study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of combination chemotherapy with paclitaxel, carboplatin, and gemcitabine in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma. METHODS: Patients with metastatic or locally unresectable transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium who had received either no or one previous systemic chemotherapy regimen were eligible. All patients received chemotherapy with intravenous paclitaxel at a dose of 200 mg/m(2) on Day 1, intravenous carboplatin at an area under the serum concentration-time curve of 5.0 on Day 1, and intravenous gemcitabine at a dose of 1000 mg/m(2) on Days 1 and 8. Treatment courses were repeated every 21 days. Patients were evaluated for response after they completed two treatment courses; patients who achieved an objective response and stable disease continued treatment for a total of six courses or until tumor progression. RESULTS: Sixty patients were treated between January 2000 and September 2003. Thirty-five patients (58%) had > or = 1 visceral sites of metastases, and only 4 patients (7%) had received any previous systemic chemotherapy. Twenty-six patients (43%) had achieved objective responses to treatment (12% complete responses). The median actuarial survival was 11 months, and the actuarial 1-year and 2-year survival rates were 46% and 27%, respectively. Myelosuppression was the most frequent toxicity, and Grade 3-4 neutropenia (using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria [version 2.0]) occurred in 72% of patients (46% of courses). Ten patients were hospitalized for the treatment of neutropenia and fever, and 1 patient died of treatment-related causes. Nonhematologic toxicities were relatively uncommon. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and gemcitabine was an active and tolerable regimen for patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma. However, the regimen was more toxic and showed no obvious incremental increase in efficacy compared retrospectively with various two-drug regimens.     

Weekly paclitaxel, estramustine phosphate, and oral etoposide in the treatment of hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma: results of a Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network phase II trial

BACKGROUND: The objective of the current study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of weekly paclitaxel, oral etoposide, and estramustine phosphate in the treatment of patients with advanced, hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma. METHODS: Patients with hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma who had received no more than one previous chemotherapy regimen were eligible for this trial. Forty-two patients were treated between February 1998 and March 2000. Toxicity was excessive in the first 3 patients treated (Grade 3-4 leukopenia, 3 patients; death due to sepsis, 1 patient); the remaining 39 patients received lower doses of etoposide and estramustine phosphate (paclitaxel 50 mg/m(2) as a 1-hour, intravenous infusion on Days 1, 8, 15; etoposide 50 mg orally twice daily on Days 1-10; and estramustine phosphate 280 mg orally 3 times daily on Days 1-10). Courses were repeated every 28 days. Patients were evaluated for objective and/or serologic response after two courses of treatment; responding patients continued treatment for six courses. RESULTS: Fourteen of 40 evaluable patients (35%) had either an objective response or a serologic response to treatment. The median survival for the entire group was 9.5 months, with 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year survival rates of 38%, 12%, and 10%, respectively. Neutropenia was the most common Grade 3-4 toxicity and occurred in 38% of patients (11% of courses). Thirteen patients (33%) had severe fatigue, and 2 patients had treatment-related deaths due to sepsis. CONCLUSIONS: Although the three-drug combination had activity in patients with hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma, the results did not appear any better than the results achieved with less toxic taxane/estramustine phosphate combinations. Further development of this three-drug regimen is not recommended.     

Hyperfractionated radiation therapy and concurrent low-dose, daily carboplatin/etoposide with or without weekend carboplatin/etoposide chemotherapy in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized trial

PURPOSE: To investigate whether the addition of weekend chemotherapy consisting of carboplatin/etoposide to hyperfractionated radiation therapy (Hfx RT) and concurrent daily carboplatin/etoposide offers an advantage over the same Hfx RT/daily carboplatin/etoposide. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 195 patients (Group I, 98; Group II, 97) were treated with either Hfx RT to a total tumor dose of 69.6 Gy via 1.2 Gy b.i.d. fractionation and daily 50 mg each of carboplatin and etoposide during the RT course (Group I) or the same Hfx RT with daily carboplatin/etoposide consisting of 30 mg each of carboplatin and etoposide and with weekend (Saturdays and Sundays) 100 mg each of carboplatin and etoposide during the RT course (Group II). RESULTS: No difference was found regarding median survival time and 5-year survival rates (20 vs. 22 months and 20% vs. 23%; p = 0.57). Median time to local progression was 20 and 19 months, respectively, while 5-year local progression-free survival rates were 28% and 27%, respectively (p = 0.66). Also, there was no difference regarding either median time to distant metastasis and 5-year distant metastasis-free survival (21 vs. 25 months and 29% vs. 34%, p = 0.29). There was no difference in the incidence of various nonhematologic toxicities between the two treatment groups, but patients treated with the weekend CHT had significantly more high-grade (> or = 3) hematologic toxicity (p = 0.0046). Late high-grade toxicity was not different between the two treatment groups. CONCLUSION: The addition of weekend carboplatin/etoposide did not improve results over those obtained with Hfx RT and concurrent low-dose, daily carboplatin/etoposide, but it led to a higher incidence of acute high-grade hematologic toxicity.     

Second-line,low-dose,weekly paclitaxel in patients with stage IIIB/IV nonsmall cell lung carcinoma who fail first-line chemotherapy with carboplatin plus paclitaxel

BACKGROUND: Second-line chemotherapy with docetaxel improves survival and quality of life (QoL) in patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) who fail first-line platinum-based regimens. The authors sought to determine the activity of second-line, low-dose, weekly paclitaxel in patients with NSCLC who failed first-line chemotherapy with carboplatin plus paclitaxel. METHODS: Patients with Stage IIIB/IV NSCLC who had received first-line carboplatin/paclitaxel were treated with low-dose (80 mg/m(2)), weekly paclitaxel at the time of disease progression. Response rates, QoL, and survival were outcome end points. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were included in this analysis. The median age was 62 years (range, 32-76 years), 55% of patients were male, 89% of patients had Stage IV NSCLC, and the Karnofsky performance status was 90-100% in 31% of patients, 70-80% in 55% of patients, and 60% in 14% of patients. Twenty-six percent of patients experienced disease progression as their best response to first-line carboplatin plus paclitaxel, whereas 52% of patients had stable disease, and 23% of patients had achieved a response. The median time from first-line carboplatin plus paclitaxel to second-line, low-dose, weekly paclitaxel was 9.5 weeks (range, 1-78 weeks). The toxicity profile was extremely favorable, with no Grade 4 toxicity and < 10% Grade 3 hematologic or nonhematologic toxicity in all patients with the exception of neuropathy. Ten percent of patients experienced both Grade 2 and Grade 3 neuropathy. The overall objective response rate was 8%. The median survival was 5.2 months (95% confidence interval [95%CI], 3.6-6.2 months), and the 1-year and 2-year survival rates were 20% (95%CI, 10-30%) and 9% (95%CI, 1-16%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Second-line, low-dose, weekly paclitaxel had activity in selected patients with Stage IIIB/IV NSCLC who failed first-line chemotherapy with carboplatin plus paclitaxel. The toxicity profile of this approach is extremely favorable, and outcome expectations are similar to the outcome expectations with other single agents in this setting.     

Carboplatin, doxorubicin and etoposide in the treatment of tumours of unknown primary site

The aim of this study was to assess the activity and toxicity of a platinum-based treatment on a group of patients with unknown primary tumours (UPTs). Patients with a diagnosis of UPT underwent a standard diagnostic procedure. Treatment was started within 2 weeks from diagnosis and consisted of carboplatin 400 mg m(-2) day 1, doxorubicin 50 mg m(-2) day 1, etoposide 100 mg m(-2) days 1-3, every 21 days. Response was evaluated after three courses and treatment continued in case of objective response (OR) or symptom control. A total of 102 patients were eligible. The median age was 59 years, sex male/female 54/48, histology was mainly adenocarcinoma or poorly differentiated carcinoma. Nodes, bone, liver and lung were the most frequently involved sites. In all, 79 patients received at least three courses of treatment; 26 patients received six courses or more. Six complete responses and 21 partial responses were observed, for a total of 27 of 102 ORs or 26.5% (95% confidence interval 18.2-36.1%). The median survival was 9 months and median progression-free survival was 4 months. Toxicity was moderate to severe, with 57.8% of patients experiencing grade III-IV haematological toxicity, mainly leucopenia. The regimen employed has shown activity in tumours of unknown primary site, but was associated with significant toxicity. Such toxicity may be considered unjustified, given the large proportion of patients with tumours not likely to respond. Efforts should therefore be addressed to identify predictors of response to chemotherapy, thus limiting aggressive treatment to those patients who could benefit from it.     

Paclitaxel by 1-h infusion in combination with carboplatin in advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC)

In our previous study, FCCC 93-024, paclitaxel by 24-h infusion combined with carboplatin yielded a response rate of 62% and median survival of 54 weeks in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Myelosuppression proved dose-limiting, requiring the routine use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF). Based on the reported activity of 1-h paclitaxel infusion in NSCLC and minimal myelosuppression at doses of 135 and 200 mg/m2 every 3 weeks and the suggestion of a dose-response relationship, we launched an intrapatient dose escalation trial of combination carboplatin and 1-h paclitaxel. Chemotherapy-na?ve patients with advanced NSCLC received paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 1-h and carboplatin dosed to a fixed targeted area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of 7.5 at three weekly intervals for six cycles. In the absence of grade 4 myelosuppression, paclitaxel was escalated by 35 mg/m2/cycle on an intrapatient basis to a maximum dose of 280 mg/m2 by cycle 4. G-CSF was not routinely used. 57 patients (pts) were accrued from November 1994 through to April 1996. 44 pts (77%) had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 1. Median age was 64 (range: 34-80) years. Cumulative peripheral sensory neuropathy proved dose-limiting and prohibitive in the first 20 evaluable patients (cohort A): grade > or = 1 in 15 patients (75%), grade 3 in 6 (30%), generally occurring at paclitaxel doses > or = 215 mg/m2 and obligating 3 patients to have treatment halted in the absence of disease progression. The protocol, therefore, was revised and the initial paclitaxel dose reduced to 135 mg/m2 with intrapatient dose escalation of 40 mg/m2/cycle to a maximum dose of 215 mg/m2, recapitulating the original dosing schema used in FCCC 93-024. 35 patients were enrolled in this second cohort (B); 33 proved evaluable. Whilst 17 (52%) experienced peripheral sensory neuropathy, grade 3 neurotoxicity developed in only 3 (9%). Myelosuppression also was less pronounced, with 42% exhibiting grade 4 granulocytopenia and 30% grade > or = 3 thrombocytopenia in cohort B compared with 70% and 50%, respectively in cohort A. Of the first 22 patients accrued to cohort A, 12 (55%) had major objective responses. Median survival was 48.5 weeks, 1-year survival rate 45% and 2-year survival rate 18%. Of 33 evaluable patients in cohort B, 9 (27%) had major objective responses. Median survival was 46 weeks, 1-year survival rate 47% and 2-year survival rate 12%. Combination paclitaxel by 1-h infusion and carboplatin at a fixed targeted AUC of 7.5 is active in advanced NSCLC. Neurotoxicity, not myelosuppression, proved dose-limiting at paclitaxel doses exceeding 215 mg/m2. Lower doses may be associated with lower response rates, but do not appear to compromise survival.     

Continuous infusion cisplatin and etoposide chemotherapy for cancer of unknown primary site (CUPS) in Taiwan, a region with a high prevalence of endemic viral infections

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of cisplatin/etoposide continuous infusion chemotherapy for cancer of unknown primary site in Taiwan, a region with a high prevalence of endemic viral infections. METHOD: Between April 1994 and February 1996, 20 patients with a diagnosis of CUPS were treated, including 15 males and five females, of average age 63.3 years (range 41-83 years). Continuous intravenous infusion of etoposide 80 mg/m2 and cisplatin 25 mg/m2 was given for 3 days every 3 weeks. Pretreatment tumor marker and viral serology studies were performed for baseline evaluation. Nearly two-thirds of the patients had poorly differentiated carcinoma. The average number of metastatic sites was 2.65 (range 1-4), with liver and lymph node involvement predominating. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 25% (95% CI 17.7-32.3%); 30.7% for poorly differentiated cancers and 25% for well differentiated cancers. Median survival was 4 months (range 1-12 months), 4.8 months for patients attaining partial response. Toxicity was moderate, grade 3 and 4 neutropenia occurred in 55% and grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia in 40%; other toxicities were mild. CA125 and CA199 were elevated in more than 50% of patients. Viral serology studies were not significantly different from those of the indigenous population. CONCLUSION: Etoposide and cisplatin combination chemotherapy has modest activity in patients with extensive CUPS and, at the schedule and dosage given, it is associated with moderate toxicity.      

Primary squamous cell carcinoma arising from endometriosis of the ovary: A case report and literature review

Cases of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) arising from ovarian endometriosis have been rarely reported. Most of the patients show a poor prognosis and present with a diminished survival time. We present a SCC case arising from endometriosis, and analyzed the clinical, therapeutic, and pathologic features through a comprehensive literature review. A 43-year premenopausal woman (gravida 2, para 1) presented to our hospital due to sudden pain in lower abdomen. Exploratory laparotomy indicated rupture of left ovarian cyst and intra-abdominal hemorrhage were observed. Frozen section pathologic examination indicated malignant ovarian (left-sided) epithelial tumor (poorly differentiated squamous carcinoma). She received hysterectomy, adnexectomy, and omentectomy. Initially, the patient received 3 cycles of chemotherapy using paclitaxel and cisplatin via peritoneal injection. Subsequently, the regimen was altered to 2 cycles of paclitaxel or cisplatin chemotherapy through intravenous injection due to poor tolerance. Upon diagnosis of vaginal metastasis, 2 cycles of chemotherapy was performed using cisplatin, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide. Pathologic analysis revealed massive poorly differentiated squamous carcinoma in the fibrous tissues. Besides, cancer embolus was noticed in the lymphatic vessels. Besides our case, 20 cases of infiltrating SCC of the ovary associated with or arising from endometriosis were found. The tumor was associated with 80% patient mortality in the first few months. Adjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin or cisplatin appeared to contribute to the survival duration. The best outcomes were obtained in patients received paclitaxel and carboplatin or cisplatin after radical surgery. In future, further studies are needed to validate the efficiency of such regimen.     

The use of carboplatin and paclitaxel with daily radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck

PURPOSE: Unresectable squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck (SCCHN) continue to pose a significant therapeutic challenge. This report defines the toxicities, efficacy, and prognostic factors associated with the combination of carboplatin (CBDCA), paclitaxel, and once-daily radiation for patients with locally advanced disease. Additionally, the pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel were investigated. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 1993-1998, 62 patients with Stage III-IV SCCHN were treated with 70.2 Gy of RT at 1.8 Gy/fraction/day to the primary site. Weekly chemotherapy was given during RT consisting of paclitaxel (45 mg/m(2)/wk) and CBDCA (100 mg/m(2)/wk). All patients presented with locally advanced disease; 77% had T4 disease and 21% had T3 disease. Fifty-eight percent had N2b-N3 disease. RESULTS: Sixty patients were evaluable for response and survival with a median follow-up of 30 months (range 7-70). Ninety-eight percent of patients completed prescribed therapy. One patient died after refusing medical management for pseudomembranous colitis and is scored as a Grade 5 toxicity. Two patients suffered Grade 4 leukopenia. Median number of break days was two. A clinical complete response (CR) at the primary site was obtained in 82%, with a total (primary site and neck) CR rate of 75%. The median survival for the entire cohort is 33 months. Response to therapy and status of the neck at presentation were the only prognostic factors found to influence survival. The median survival for patients who attained a CR is 49 months versus 9 months in those who did not attain a CR (p < 0.0001). The 2- and 3-year overall survival for complete responders are 79% and 61%. Plasma paclitaxel concentrations in the range shown to be radiosensitizing were achieved. CONCLUSIONS: Weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel given concurrently with definitive once-daily external beam radiation therapy is well tolerated with over 90% of patients completing prescribed therapy. An ultimate CR rate of greater than 70% was obtained, which translated directly into improved survival. With 48% 3-year overall survival for the entire group, this regimen is an excellent option for this group of patients with a historically poor prognosis.     

Curative combination chemotherapy for patients with advanced poorly differentiated carcinoma of unknown primary site

We have previously reported complete responses and long-term survival following cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy in some patients with advanced poorly differentiated carcinomas of unknown primary site. In order to better define the clinical and pathologic characteristics of the chemotherapy-responsive subgroup, we have reviewed the case histories of our 32 patients who achieved complete response to combination chemotherapy. Initial light microscopic diagnoses were as follows: poorly differentiated carcinoma (23 patients), poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (eight patients), or poorly differentiated large cell carcinoma (one patient). The median age was 37 years (range, 19-70); 25 of 32 patients were male. All patients had unresectable neoplasms at the time of diagnosis. Twenty-two patients had metastases at two or more locations. In 27 of 32 patients (84%), the predominant site of tumor involvement was either in the mediastinum, retroperitoneum, lymph nodes, or lungs. Six patients were assigned more specific diagnoses at some time during their clinical course on the basis of further pathologic evaluation, additional biopsy material, or autopsy: germinal tumors, two patients; adenocarcinoma of the lung, one patient; carcinoid tumor of the lung, one patient; and malignant melanoma, two patients. Eighteen patients (56%) remain continuously disease free at a median of 77 months following diagnosis and are considered unlikely to recur. All patients with poorly differentiated carcinomas and tumor location in the mediastinum, retroperitoneum, lungs, or lymph nodes should be considered for treatment with intensive cisplatin-containing combination chemotherapy, since some of these patients have potentially curable malignancies.     

Phase II trial of cisplatin/etoposide and concurrent radiotherapy followed by paclitaxel/carboplatin consolidation for limited small-cell lung cancer: Southwest Oncology Group 9713.

PURPOSE: Limited small-cell lung cancer (LSCLC) is characterized by a high initial response rate to chemoradiotherapy, but local or systemic relapse occurs in the majority of patients. Previous Southwest Oncology Group trials in LSCLC have utilized cisplatin and etoposide (PE) delivered concurrently with thoracic radiotherapy followed by two consolidation cycles. Newer chemotherapy regimens such as paclitaxel and carboplatin are active in small-cell lung cancer and hold the promise of improving both local and systemic control. S9713 evaluated the substitution of paclitaxel and carboplatin for PE consolidation in LSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between July 1998 and August 1999, 96 patients were accrued from 43 institutions. Eighty-nine patients were eligible; 87 were assessable for survival and response. Treatment consisted of cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, 29, and 36, and etoposide 50 mg/m(2) on days 1 to 5 and days 29 to 33, with concurrent radiotherapy of 61 Gy beginning on day 1. Consolidation therapy was carboplatin (area under the curve = 6) and paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2), both drugs administered on day 1 of a 21 day cycle for three cycles. RESULTS: The response rate was 86% (complete response, 33%; partial response, 53%). Median overall survival was 17 months (95% CI, 12.7 to 19.0). One- and 2-year overall survivals were 61% and 33%, respectively. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 9 months, 1-year PFS was 40%, and 2-year PFS was 21%. CONCLUSION: Consolidation therapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin in LSCLC resulted in an outcome similar to that seen in prior Southwest Oncology Group trials. This study and others which have tested paclitaxel in small-cell lung cancer dampens enthusiasm for this agent in the primary management of LSCLC.     

Phase I/II trial of paclitaxel by 1-hour infusion, carboplatin, and gemcitabine in the treatment of patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma

BACKGROUND: The combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin is widely used in the treatment of patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma. In this Phase I/II study the authors evaluated the feasibility, toxicity, and efficacy of adding a third active antineoplastic agent, gemcitabine, to the paclitaxel/carboplatin combination for the treatment of patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma. METHODS: Patients with advanced (AJCC Stage IIIB or IV) nonsmall cell lung carcinoma previously untreated with chemotherapy were eligible for this trial. The maximum tolerated doses, determined in the Phase I trial and subsequently used in the Phase II trial, were: paclitaxel, 200 mg/m2, as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1; carboplatin, at area under the curve dose of 5.0 intravenously (i.v.), on Day 1; and gemcitabine, 1000 mg/m2 i.v., on Days 1 and 8. Treatment courses were repeated every 21 days. The Phase II study was conducted in 13 community-based practices in the Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network; 77 patients were treated between December 1996 and September 1997. RESULTS: Thirty-four of 77 patients (44%) in the Phase II trial had major responses (partial responses, 32 patients and complete responses, 2 patients). An additional 25 patients (33%) had stable disease or minor response; only 23% of patients progressed or were removed from study at or prior to first reevaluation. The median survival was 9.4 months, with a 45% actuarial 1-year survival rate. Myelosuppression was the most common toxicity, with Grade 3/4 NCI Common Toxicity Criteria leukopenia and thrombocytopenia in 49% and 45% of patients, respectively. However, only 11 patients (14%) required hospitalization for neutropenia/ fever, and none had bleeding complications. Grade 3/4 nonhematologic toxicities included fatigue (41%), arthralgias/myalgias (26%), peripheral neuropathy (8%), nausea/emesis (6%), and hypersensitivity reactions (4%). There was one treatment-related death due to sepsis. CONCLUSIONS: This three-drug regimen is active and has acceptable toxicity in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma. Myelosuppression, particularly thrombocytopenia, is increased in comparison to the paclitaxel/carboplatin regimen. Fatigue also may be increased, but other nonhematologic toxicities are not altered substantially by adding gemcitabine. Although the response rate and median survival are improved modestly compared with our previous experience with paclitaxel/carboplatin, definitive conclusions regarding the efficacy of this regimen await the completion of randomized trials.