Propofol reduces emesis after sufentanil supplemented anaesthesia in paediatric squint surgery

Background. Squint surgery is associated with a high incidence of postoperative emesis. The purpose of this prospective study was to examine the influence of propofol and isoflurane anaesthesia on the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting in children.
Methods. Ninety children aged 3–10 years were randomly allocated to one of 3 groups. In all groups, children received 2 mg/kg propofol, 0.5 μg/kg sufentanil and 0.5 mg/ kg atracurium for induction of anaesthesia. In group 1, anaesthesia was maintained with 15–20 mg/kg·h propofol and children were ventilated with 30% O₂ in air. In group 2, anaesthesia was maintained with 10–15 mg/kg·h propofol and 30% O₂ in N₂O. In group 3, anaesthesia was maintained with 1.0–1.5 Vol% isoflurane and 30% O₂ in N₂O. The time of extubation, awakening and postoperative surveillance, the incidence and numbers of episodes of postoperative nausea and vomiting were registered as well as requirements of antiemetics. Statistics were made using ANO-VA and Chi-square test or Kruskal-Wallis test with P <0.05 considered as significant.
Results. The overall incidence of nausea ( P =0.0001) and vomiting ( P =0.002) was higher in group 3 (70%;73%) than in group 1 (13%; 23%) and 2 (20%;28%). Episodes of nausea ( P =0.0001) and vomiting ( P =0.0013) were more frequent in group 3 (74%;69%) than in group 1 (13%;15%) and 2 (13%;16%). Antiemetic requirements were higher and the time of postoperative sleep and surveillance was longer in group 3 than in group 1 and 2 ( P =0.04).
Conclusion. Propofol-sufentanil anaesthesia results in less emesis and treatment during the early postoperative phase irrespective of N₂O administration compared with propofol- induced isoflurane anaesthesia and may be recommended in children undergoing squint surgery.     

Prevention of nausea and vomiting with granisetron, droperidol and metoclopramide during and after spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Background: Nausea and vomiting during and after spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section are distressing to the patient. This study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy and safety of granisetron, droperidol and metoclopramide for the prevention of nausea and vomiting in parturients undergoing caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia.
Methods: In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 120 patients received granisetron 3 mg, droperidol 1.25 mg, metoclopramide 10 mg or placebo (saline) ( n =30 of each) i. v. immediately after clamping of the foetal umbilical cord. Nausea, vomiting and safety assessments were performed during and after spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section.
Results: The incidence of intraoperative, post-delivery nausea and vomiting was 13%, 17%, 20% and 63% after administration of granisetron, droperidol, metoclopramide and placebo, respectively; the corresponding incidence during 0–3 h after surgery was 7%, 27%, 27% and 43%; the corresponding incidence during 3–24 h after surgery was 7%, 20%, 23% and 37% ( P <0.05; overall Fisher's exact probability test). No clinically important adverse events were observed in any of the groups.
Conclusion: Granisetron is highly effective for preventing nausea and vomiting during and after spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Droperidol and metoclopramide are effective for the prevention of intraoperative, post-delivery emesis, but are ineffective for the reduction of the incidence of postoperative emesis.     

Postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy under spinal anaesthesia: a randomized study of ondansetron prophylaxis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy under general anaesthesia have a high risk of developing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of PONV in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy under spinal anaesthesia with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) using morphine and to compare its incidence with and without antiemetic prophylaxis. METHODS: Thirty-four patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy under spinal anaesthesia with i.v. PCA morphine postoperatively were divided into two groups. The first (n = 17) received ondansetron prophylaxis near the end of surgery while the second (n = 17) received no prophylaxis. Morphine consumption, emetic episodes (on a 3-point scale), patient satisfaction (visual analogue score), sedation and pruritus were evaluated 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24h postoperatively. RESULTS: Patient characteristics, postoperative morphine consumption (43.3 +/- 7.6 vs. 40.3 +/- 12.3 mg) and peristaltic recovery time (16.9 +/- 5 vs. 18.4 +/- 5.2 h) were similar in both groups. Overall nausea and vomiting were significantly lower in the ondansetron prophylaxis group than in the group without prophylaxis (52.9% vs. 88.2%, P < 0.05). Though nausea alone was higher in the prophylaxis group (41.2% vs. 29.4%), nausea with vomiting was significantly lower in the prophylaxis group (11.8% vs. 58.8%, P < 0.01). Patients' satisfaction scores were higher in the ondansetron group at all times and the difference was significant (P < 0.05) 4 h postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of PONV in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy under spinal anaesthesia with i.v. PCA morphine is very high (88.2%). Antiemetic prophylaxis with ondansetron is highly recommended in this patients group resulting in a lower incidence of nausea and vomiting, and significantly improves patient' satisfaction and life quality in the early postoperative period.     

Opioid supplementation to propofol anaesthesia for outpatient abortion: a comparison between alfentanil, fentanyl and placebo

One hundred and sixty-four patients scheduled for elective termination of pregnancy under general anaesthesia were randomly assigned to receive one of three different supplements to propofol and oxygen in nitrous oxide anaesthesia: 0.1 mg fentanyl, 0.5 mg alfentanil or placebo. Postoperative pain and nausea, as well as complications during anaesthesia were studied. There were no differences in complications or complaints by surgeons during anaesthesia, and no patient in any group reacted unsatisfactorily to surgery. The patients in the placebo group consumed significantly more propofol during the procedure (P less than 0.001). No differences were seen in time until hospital discharge between the three groups. Complaints about postoperative pain were significantly less frequent among patients receiving fentanyl (P less than 0.01). The number of patients requesting postoperative analgetics, however, did not differ. There was no difference in the frequency of nausea or vomiting, but postoperative pain was found significantly to increase complaints of nausea (P less than 0.01) and also time until hospital discharge (P less than 0.01). In conclusion, opioid supplementation lowered the amount of propofol needed for anaesthesia. Alfentanil 0.5 mg did not improve the postoperative course. Fentanyl 0.1 mg decreased the frequency of postoperative pain without increasing the time to hospital discharge.     

Nerve-stimulator guided paravertebral blockade vs. general anaesthesia for breast surgery: a prospective randomized trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Different anaesthetic techniques are used during breast surgery but are frequently associated with unsatisfactory postoperative analgesia. Paravertebral nerve blockade has recently been proposed as a favourable alternative for this type of surgical procedure, providing excellent pain relief and a reduced incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. The aim of the present study was to compare the use of a nerve-stimulator guided paravertebral nerve blockade technique to regular general anaesthesia for breast surgery. METHODS: Sixty patients were prospectively randomized to receive either paravertebral nerve blockade or general anaesthesia for breast surgery. The primary end-point of the study was to assess postoperative analgesia (visual analogue scale and supplemental opioid requirements); the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting and length of hospital stay were considered as secondary outcome measures. RESULTS: Visual analogue scores both at rest and at movement, as well as the need for supplemental opioid administration during the first 3 days postoperatively, were significantly lower in patients handled with para-vertebral nerve blockade compared to patients receiving general anaesthesia (P < 0.05). The number of patients free from nausea and vomiting after operation was significantly higher in the paravertebral nerve blockade group (93%) compared to the general anaesthesia group (67%) (P < 0.05). The use of paravertebral nerve blockade was also associated with a significantly shorter hospital stay (median 1 day) compared to general anaesthesia (2 days) (P < 0.01). Both the performance of the block and the intraoperative conditions was well accepted by the vast majority of patients treated by paravertebral nerve blockade (97%). CONCLUSION: The use of paravertebral nerve blockade was associated with improved postoperative pain relief, a reduced incidence of nausea and vomiting after operation and a shorter duration of hospital stay compared to general anaesthesia in patients undergoing breast surgery.     

Spinal anaesthesia for spinal surgery

Spinal anaesthesia for spinal surgery is becoming increasingly more popular because this anaesthetic technique allows the patient to self-position and avoid neurological injury that may occur with prone positioning under general anaesthesia. Spinal anaesthesia reduces intraoperative surgical blood loss, improves perioperative haemodynamic stability and reduces pain in the immediate postoperative period. This leads to a reduced need for analgesics and a reduction in the incidence of nausea and vomiting in the postoperative setting. Spinal anaesthesia for lumbar spine surgery also decreases the incidence of lower extremity thrombo-embolic complications and does not increase the occurrence of problems with micturition. These benefits increase the patient's satisfaction, and they expedite discharge of the patient from the hospital. Combination anaesthetic techniques, using both subarachnoid and epidural dosing schemes, may be beneficial for improving postoperative pain control and add further to the benefit of spinal anaesthesia for lumbar spine surgical procedures.     

Spinal,epidural or propofol anaesthesia for out–patient knee arthroscopy?

Background : We have compared three different methods of anaesthesia for out–patient knee arthroscopy in terms of perioperative conditions, postoperative pain, time taken and economy.
Methods : 91 ASA I–II patients scheduled for elective knee arthroscopy were included. After premedication with diazepam 10 mg and naproxene 500 mg orally, they were randomly assigned into one of three groups: Group S (n=32) received spinal anaesthesia with lidocaine 50 mg/ml 1.5–2 ml in 7.5% glucose through a 27–G Quincke needle, Group E (n=29) received epidural anaesthesia with mepivacaine 20 mg/ml and epinephrine 5 μg/ml, 15–20 ml, and Group P (n=30) received propofol anaesthesia with a bolus induction of 2 mg/kg followed by infusion.
Results : The time from start of anaesthesia until start of operation was significantly less in Group P than in the two other Groups: 7.45.4 min as compared to 23.04.8 min in Group S and 31.09.1 min in Group E (meanSD, P<0.05). After end of surgery, the duration of the postoperative regional block was 7528 min in Group S and 125 79 min in Group E (P<0.05). In Group S and Group E the postoperative pain was significantly less than in Group P at admission to the recovery unit and 60, 120 and 180 min later (P<0.05). The overall incidence of postoperative nausea or vomiting was less than 5% with no differences between the groups. One patient in Group E had block failure and one patient in Group S had a post–spinal headache. The perioperative costs of drugs and disposables were highest in Group P (30 USD) and lowest in Group S (6.5 USD).
Conclusion : Propofol anaesthesia results in the shortest stay in the operation theatre but a higher degree of postoperative pain and a higher cost of drugs and disposables.     

Granisetron prevents nausea and vomiting during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section

Background: Nausea and vomiting during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section are common and unpleasant complications. This study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of granisetron, a selective 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 receptor antagonist, for prophylactic treatment of nausea and vomiting in parturients undergoing nonemergent caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia.
Methods: In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 100 patients, 21–38 years, received either placebo (saline) or granisetron at 3 different doses (20 μg · kg^-1, 40 μg · kg^-1 or 80 μg · kg^-1) (n=25 for each) intravenously immediately after clamping of the foetal umbilical cord. Nausea, vomiting and safety assessments were performed during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section.
Results: The treatment groups were similar with regard to maternal characteristics and operative management. The incidence of nausea and vomiting was 64%, 52%, 14% and 12% after administration of placebo and granisetron in a dose of 20 μg · kg^-1, 40 μg · kg^-1 and 80 μg · kg^-1, respectively ( P <0.05; overall Fisher's exact probability test). No clinically important adverse effects were observed in any group.
Conclusions: Prophylactic use of granisetron in a minimum dose of 40 μg · kg^-1 is effective for preventing nausea and vomiting during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section.
© Acta Anaesthesiologiat Scandinavica 42 (1998)     

A prospective randomised double blind study to evaluate the effect of peribulbar block or topical application of local anaesthesia combined with general anaesthesia on intra-operative and postoperative complications during paediatric strabismus surgery

We studied 45 ASA I/II children aged between 2 and 13 years scheduled for elective strabismus surgery, randomly allocated to receive either a peribulbar block or topical lidocaine 2% combined with general anaesthesia, or general anaesthesia alone. The incidence and severity of the occulocardiac reflex, the requirement for atropine, the occurrence of arrhythmias and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting following surgery at 1, 2 and 4 h were studied. We found the incidence and severity of occulocardiac reflex intra-operatively was significantly reduced in children who received a peribulbar block. The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was significantly reduced in patients receiving either peribulbar block or topical local anaesthesia combined with general anaesthesia, compared to general anaesthesia alone (p = 0.008).     

Granisetron reduces incidence of nausea and vomiting after breast surgery

Background: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) remains a troublesome problem. This study was performed to evaluate the antiemetic efficacy of prophylactic granisetron, a selective 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 receptor antagonist, on the incidence of PONV in patients undergoing general anaesthesia for breast surgery.
Methods: In a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study, 50 female patients, 45–68 years, were given a single dose of either placebo (saline, n=25) or granisetron (40 ug kg^-1, n= 25) intravenously over 2–5 min immediately before the induction of anaesthesia. Postoperatively, during the first 24 hours after anaesthesia, the incidence of PONV and adverse events was recorded.
Results: The treatment groups were similar for patient demographics, types of surgery, anaesthetic and postoperative management. Postoperatively, the incidence of PONV was 48% and 16% after administration of placebo and granisetron, respectively ( P < 0.05). No differences in the incidence of other adverse events were observed between the two groups.
Conclusion: Granisetron is an effective antiemetic for preventing PONV in patients undergoing general anaesthesia for breast surgery.     

Effects of peribulbar bupivacaine as an adjunct to general anaesthesia on peri-operative outcome following retinal detachment surgery

Sixty premedicated, ASA physical status I or II patients weighing > 25 kg scheduled for elective retinal detachment repair were randomly assigned to receive either peribulbar block with 10 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine (block group) or intravenous morphine 150 microg.kg-1 (morphine group), prior to the induction of general anaesthesia (n = 30 in each group). Patients were evaluated for intra-operative oculocardiac reflex, peri-operative pain relief, recovery from anaesthesia and postoperative nausea and vomiting. Apart from significantly reducing the incidence of oculocardiac reflex (30% vs. 70%, p = 0.0019), peribulbar bupivacaine also attenuated the severity of the reflex. Postoperative pain relief was superior in the block group. More block group patients had the maximum recovery score in the immediate postoperative period (80% vs. 27%, p < 0. 0001) and they achieved complete recovery significantly faster than the morphine group (17.3 (14.7) min vs. 66.7 (29.7) min, p < 0.0001). The incidence (40% vs. 77%, p = 0.004) and severity of postoperative nausea and vomiting were significantly less in the block group. In summary, peribulbar bupivacaine, when administered together with general anaesthesia, attenuated oculocardiac reflex, provided comparable intra-operative and superior postoperative analgesia, resulted in significantly earlier and better recovery from anaesthesia, and significantly reduced the incidence and severity of postoperative nausea and vomiting.     

Incidence of nausea and vomiting in children after strabismus surgery following desflurane anaesthesia

In a prospective, randomized parallel study, 60 ASA I-III children aged 1-17 years, scheduled for elective strabismus surgery, were anaesthetized with desflurane without prophylactic antiemetic medication. The objective of the study was to determine the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting after general anaesthesia with desflurane. To decide whether nitrous oxide further influences these symptoms, the patients were randomly assigned to two groups of 30 patients each. One group received desflurane in oxygen/air and a second group received desflurane in oxygen/nitrous oxide. In all children, after intravenous induction and tracheal intubation, anaesthesia was administered as minimal flow anaesthesia with oxygen and nitrous oxide or air according to the random plan. The patients were observed for 48 postoperative hours until their discharge from the ward. The overall incidence of nausea was found to be 37%, and vomiting was seen in 32% of all patients. No statistical correlation was found between the incidence of postoperative emesis and the administration of nitrous oxide or the duration of general anaesthesia. Instead, the incidence of vomiting was 2.5-fold higher when surgery was performed on both eyes compared with one eye. The relatively low incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, as well as the quick recovery from anaesthesia, permitting an early discharge from the postoperative care unit to the ward, show desflurane to be a suitable volatile anaesthetic in strabismus surgery in children.     

A prospective survey of postoperative nausea and vomiting with special regard to incidence and relations to patient characteristics, anesthetic routines and surgical procedures

We performed a prospective study on 421 patients subjected to routine general-, orthopaedic-, urologic-, gynecological and paediatric surgery to estimate the current incidences of nausea and vomiting during the first 24 hours after surgery.
The overall incidences of postoperative nausea or vomiting were 17% and 28%, respectively. Postoperative emetic symptoms were not related to age in adults. Women had more often emetic symptoms than men ( P <0.01). In general, opiate premedication was more frequently associated with postoperative nausea and vomiting than benzodiazepines ( P <0.01), but in otherwise comparable subgroups of patients undergoing major surgery, this difference was not confirmed. Balanced general anaesthesia caused more nausea (23%) and vomiting (53%) than face-mask anaesthesia (13% and 15%, respectively) or regional blocks (12% and 7%, respectively) ( P <0.001). There was a positive correlation between the duration of anaesthesia and the incidence of postoperative emetic symptoms ( P <0.001). The incidences of postoperative nausea and vomiting after abdominal surgery were 23% and 58% respectively. Corresponding figures for orthopaedic surgery were 25% and 34%, other kinds of extra-abdominal surgery 18% and 32% and for laparoscopy 21% and 25%. After minor gynecological-, urological-and paediatric surgery the incidences were less than 20%.
In conclusion female gender, balanced anaesthesia, lengthy duration of anaesthesia, and abdominal and orthopaedic operations appeared to be most frequently associated with postoperative emetic symptoms.     

Postoperative symptoms 24 hours after ambulatory anaesthesia

Purpose

To test the hypothesis that the type of surgical procedure influences the incidence of postoperative symptoms. Also the effect of demographic and clinical risk variables: age, sex, ASA status, duration of anaesthesia on the postoperative symptoms were evaluated for each type of surgery.

Methods

Demographic, medical, anaesthetic and surgical data on 1,017 patients were prospectively collected by a research assistant who telephoned each patient 24 hr after discharge to administer a questionnaire to determine postoperative symptoms. Postoperative symptoms included incisional pain, nausea/vomiting, drowsiness, dizziness, headache and fever. In addition, 270 patients were asked the % (0–100) of their return to daily living function at 24 hr.

Results

Incisionat pain (26.9%), headache (11.6%), and drowsiness (11.5%) were the most frequently reported symptoms. Dizziness was reported by 9.7% and nausea/vomiting by 7.1%. Approximately 50% of patients undergoing laparoscopy, orthopaedic and general surgery reported 24-hr postoperative incisionat pain. The incidence of 24-hr postoperative nausea/vomiting was highest after general 17.4%, orthopaedic, 11.2%, and laparoscopic surgery, 9.4%. Drowsiness was highest after laparoscopy 36.1%, followed by general surgery, 21.4%. Dizziness was most frequent after laparoscopy, 24.1%, followed by general surgery, 16.1%. After laparoscopy, postoperative drowsiness or dizziness was related to anaesthesia duration. After general surgery, postoperative dizziness or drowsiness were related to age; the younger the patient, the more likely the symptoms.

Conclusions

Postoperative pain, nausea/vomiting, drowsiness, dizziness, and headache were the more frequent postoperative symptoms 24 hr after ambulatory surgery and they were influenced by the type of surgical procedure. In addition, the type of surgery and the 24-hr postoperative symptoms determined the degree of return to daily living function.     

Do anticholinergic agents affect the occurrence of postanaesthetic nausea?

In order to establish if anticholinergic drugs might influence postoperative nausea and vomiting, 100 ASA I-II adult patients scheduled for minor orthopaedic procedures, varicose vein stripping or inguinal herniorraphy were randomised to receive, in a double-blind fashion, either a premedicant and a reversal dose of 0.003 and 0.0075 mg/kg of glycopyrrolate or 0.006 and 0.015 mg/kg of atropine, respectively. Nitrous oxide, after thiopentone induction was used for anaesthesia with fentanyl and diazepam as supplements and pancuronium for relaxation. In the recovery room, up to 2 h after surgery, 28% of the patients in the glycopyrrolate group and 8% in the atropine group experienced nausea (P = 0.017). Thereafter, the patients complained of nausea at decreased and equal frequencies in both groups. The incidence of vomiting was not statistically significantly different. Droperidol was needed, to control persistent emesis, three times more often in the glycopyrrolate than in the atropine group. It is concluded that substitution of glycopyrrolate for atropine increases the likelihood of postoperative nausea, and continued use of atropine should be considered in patients at risk of postoperative emesis.     

The effect on outcome of peribulbar anaesthesia in conjunction with general anesthesia for vitreoretinal surgery

The purpose of this study was to evaluate peri‐operative outcome after vitreoretinal surgery when peribulbar anaesthesia is combined with general anaesthesia. Sixty adult patients undergoing elective primary retinal detachment surgery with scleral buckling or an encircling procedure received either peribulbar anaesthesia in conjunction with general anaesthesia or general anaesthesia alone. For peribulbar anaesthesia a single percutaneous injection of 5–7 ml of local anaesthetic solution (0.75% ropivacaine with hyaluronidase 15 iu.ml^?1) was used. The incidence of intra‐operative oculocardiac reflex and surgical bleeding interfering with the surgical field, postoperative pain and analgesia requirements, and postoperative nausea and vomiting were recorded. In the block group there was a lower incidence of oculocardiac reflex and surgical bleeding intra‐operatively. Patients in the block group also had better postoperative analgesia and a lower incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting compared with the group without a block. The use of peribulbar anaesthesia in conjunction with general anesthesia was superior to general anaesthesia alone for vitreoretinal surgery with scleral buckling.     

Spinal anaesthesia in former preterm infants

Spinal anaesthesia for herniotomies in former preterm infants at risk from postoperative apnoea was investigated in a prospective, uncontrolled study involving 164 infants. Hyperbaric tetracaine (0.5 mg·kg^?1) with adrenaline was used. In 152 patients (92.7%) spinal blockade was achieved, in 12 (7.3%) general anaesthesia was given after unsuccessful lumbar puncture. Fifteen patients required supplementation of spinal anaesthesia. Intraoperative complications included 2 apnoea during lumbar puncture and 5 total spinal blocks. By the end of surgery all complications had been resolved. No patient with spinal anaesthesia developed prolonged apnoea after surgery. Spinal anaesthesia in former preterm infants seems to avoid prolonged postoperative apnoea. Disadvantages of the technique were failures due to technical difficulties and excessive spread of spinal blockade.     

Efficacy of mirtazapine in preventing intrathecal morphine-induced nausea and vomiting after orthopaedic surgery*

Nausea and vomiting are frequent complications of intrathecal morphine. In this randomised, double-blind trial, we tested the efficacy of mirtazapine, an antidepressant that blocks receptors associated with vomiting, on the incidence of nausea and vomiting after intrathecal morphine. One hundred patients receiving spinal anaesthesia for lower limb surgery were assigned equally to take either an orally disintegrating form of 30 mg mirtazapine or matching placebo 1 h before surgery. Spinal anaesthesia was performed by injection of 15 mg isobaric bupivacaine 0.5% along with 0.2 mg preservative-free morphine. Nausea and vomiting were evaluated 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 h after intrathecal morphine administration. The incidence of nausea and vomiting was significantly lower in patients receiving mirtazapine compared with placebo (26.5% vs 56.3%, respectively; p = 0.005). The mean (SD) onset time of postoperative nausea and vomiting was significantly delayed in mirtazapine patients: 9.4 (2.5) vs 5.2 (1.8) h, respectively; p < 0.0001. The severity of nausea and vomiting was also decreased after mirtazapine at the 3-6 h and 6-12 h periods. Our data indicate that pre-operative mirtazapine decreases the incidence, delays the onset and reduces the severity of nausea and vomiting induced by intrathecal morphine in patients undergoing spinal anaesthesia.     

Effects of intrathecal ketamine added to bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia

We prospectively studied 30 healthy female patients undergoing intracavitory brachytherapy applicator insertion for carcinoma of the cervix under spinal anaesthesia. Patients were randomly allocated to receive either intrathecal bupivacaine 10 mg alone or bupivacaine 7.5 mg combined with preservative-free ketamine 25 mg. Spinal block onset, maximum sensory level, duration of blockade, haemodynamic variables, postoperative analgesic requirements and adverse events were recorded. Onset of sensory and motor block and duration of spinal analgesia were comparable between groups. Duration of motor blockade was shorter (p = 0.0416) and requirement for intravenous fluids in the peri-operative period was less (p = 0.0159) in the ketamine group. Significantly more patients in the ketamine group had adverse events, such as sedation, dizziness, nystagmus, 'strange feelings' and postoperative nausea and vomiting. Although the addition of ketamine to spinal bupivacaine had local anaesthetic sparing effects, it did not provide extended postoperative analgesia or decrease the postoperative analgesic requirements. Moreover, the central adverse effects of ketamine limit its spinal application.     

A comparison of total intravenous with balanced anaesthesia for middle ear surgery: effects on postoperative nausea and vomiting,pain, and conditions of surgery

We compared postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), pain and conditions for surgery in patients scheduled for middle ear surgery. In a double-blind study, 100 patients were randomly allocated to receive either balanced anaesthesia (group A) using fentanyl, propofol and isoflurane, or total intravenous anaesthesia (group B) using propofol and remifentanil infusions. Pain scores, nausea/vomiting scores, conditions for surgery and analgesic requirements were recorded for 18 h post operatively. In the recovery ward, patients in group B suffered significantly less PONV (p = 0.026) with a reduced requirement for anti-emetic medication (p = 0.023); however, this difference was not maintained on the ward. The overall incidence of PONV was 34% and 17% in groups A and B, respectively. Initial pain scores were higher in group B in the recovery ward (p = 0.003) and patients required more morphine administration (p = 0.002); however, pain scores were similar on the ward. Conditions for surgery were found to be better in group B.