Myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation for advanced stage multiple myeloma: very long‐term follow up of a single center experience

We aimed to review the long‐term outcome of myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) performed for multiple myeloma (MM) at our institution. Records of all patients who received standard myeloablative allogeneic SCT for MM were retrospectively reviewed. Overall survival (OS), progression‐free survival (PFS), and event‐free survival (EFS) were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method. In total 37 transplants had been performed. Median follow up post‐SCT was 108 months (range: 33–148). The majority of patients suffered advanced stage disease and/or had received multiple prior therapies prior to SCT. Transplant‐related mortality (TRM) at 100 days was 32%. Grades 2–4 acute graft‐vs.‐host disease (GVHD) occurred in 18 patients (49%), and extensive stage chronic GVHD in seven (28%) of 25 patients surviving greater than day 100. Median OS, PFS, and EFS were 28 months, 66 months and 13 months, respectively, with 5 year OS, PFS, and EFS 40%, 54% and 24%. Our results suggest that allogeneic SCT, even when performed in advanced stage, heavily pretreated MM, still results in long‐term EFS in a significant minority of patients. Efforts should continue on alternative allogeneic SCT approaches to reduce the high early TRM rate associated with myeloablative conditioning.     

Myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation for advanced stage multiple myeloma: very long-term follow up of a single center experience

We aimed to review the long-term outcome of myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) performed for multiple myeloma (MM) at our institution. Records of all patients who received standard myeloablative allogeneic SCT for MM were retrospectively reviewed. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and event-free survival (EFS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. In total 37 transplants had been performed. Median follow up post-SCT was 108 months (range: 33-148). The majority of patients suffered advanced stage disease and/or had received multiple prior therapies prior to SCT. Transplant-related mortality (TRM) at 100 days was 32%. Grades 2-4 acute graft-vs.-host disease (GVHD) occurred in 18 patients (49%), and extensive stage chronic GVHD in seven (28%) of 25 patients surviving greater than day 100. Median OS, PFS, and EFS were 28 months, 66 months and 13 months, respectively, with 5 year OS, PFS, and EFS 40%, 54% and 24%. Our results suggest that allogeneic SCT, even when performed in advanced stage, heavily pretreated MM, still results in long-term EFS in a significant minority of patients. Efforts should continue on alternative allogeneic SCT approaches to reduce the high early TRM rate associated with myeloablative conditioning.     

Early lymphocyte recovery predicts superior survival after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma or non-Hodgkin lymphoma

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) improves survival in patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma (MM) and relapsed, chemotherapy-sensitive, aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Lower relapse rates seen in allogeneic stem cell transplantation have been related to early absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) recovery as a manifestation of early graft-verus-tumor effect. In ASCT, the relation between ALC recovery and clinical outcomes in MM and NHL was not previously described. This is a retrospective study of patients with MM and NHL who underwent ASCT at the Mayo Clinic between 1987 and 1999. The ALC threshold was determined at 500 cells/microL on day 15 after ASCT. The study identified 126 patients with MM and 104 patients with NHL. The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) times for patients with MM were significantly longer in patients with an ALC of 500 cells/microL or more than patients with an ALC of fewer than 500 cells/microL (33 vs 12 months, P <.0001; 16 vs 8 months, P <.0003, respectively). For patients with NHL, the median OS and PFS times were significantly longer in patients with an ALC of 500 cells/microL or more versus those with fewer than 500 cells/microL (not reached vs 6 months, P <.0001; not reached vs 4 months, P <.0001, respectively). Multivariate analysis demonstrated day 15 ALC to be an independent prognostic indicator for OS and PFS rates for both groups of patients. In conclusion, ALC is correlated with clinical outcome and requires further study. (Blood. 2001;98:579-585)     

A phase 2 study of modified lenalidomide,bortezomib and dexamethasone in transplant‐ineligible multiple myeloma

We sought a regimen that incorporates optimal novel agents and balances efficacy with toxicity in transplant‐ineligible multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Our study evaluated modified lenalidomide‐bortezomib‐dexamethasone (RVD lite) in this population and was administered over a 35‐day cycle. Lenalidomide 15 mg was given orally on days 1–21; bortezomib 1·3 mg/m² weekly subcutaneously on days 1, 8, 15 and 22; and dexamethasone 20 mg orally was given on the day of and day after bortezomib for 9 cycles followed by 6 cycles of consolidation with lenalidomide and bortezomib. The primary objective was to evaluate the overall response rate (ORR); secondary objectives included safety, progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Fifty‐three eligible patients were screened between April 2013 and May 2015; 50 received at least one dose of therapy. Median age at study entry was 73 years (range 65–91). The ORR was 86% and 66% of patients achieved a very good partial response or better. Median PFS was 35·1 months (95% confidence interval 30·9–not reached) and median OS was not reached at a median follow‐up of 30 months. Peripheral neuropathy was reported in 31 (62%) patients with only 1 patient experiencing grade 3 symptoms. RVD lite is a well‐tolerated and highly effective regimen, with robust PFS and OS, in the transplant‐ineligible MM population.     

Good clinical activity and favorable toxicity profile of once weekly bortezomib,fotemustine, and dexamethasone (B‐MuD) for the treatment of relapsed multiple myeloma

Since multiple myeloma (MM) is still not‐curable, the management of relapse remains challenging. Given the known efficacy of alkylating agents in MM, we conducted a phase I/II study to test a new three drug combination in which Fotemustine (Muphoran), an alkylating agent of nitrosurea family, was added to bortezomib + dexamethasone backbone (B‐MuD) for the treatment of MM relapsed patients. Fotemustine was administered at two dose levels (80–100 mg/m² i.v.) on day 1. The original 21‐day schedule was early amended for extra‐hematological toxicity and a 35‐day schedule was adopted (Bortezomib 1.3 mg/m² i.v. on days 1, 8, 15, and 22, Dexamethasone 20 mg i.v. on days 1, 8, 15, and 22) for a total of six courses. Twenty‐four patients were enrolled. The maximum tolerated dose of Fotemustine was 100 mg/m². The overall response rate was of 62% (CR 8%, VGPR 33%, and PR 21%). The median OS was 28.5 months, the median progression‐free survival (PFS) was 19.1 months. B‐MuD resulted effective in patients previous exposed to bortezomib without difference of response (P = 0.25) and PFS (P = 0.87) when compared to bortezomib‐naive patients. Thrombocytopenia was the most common AE overall. In conclusion, B‐MuD is an effective and well tolerated combination in relapsed MM patients even in advanced disease phase. © Am. J. Hematol., 88:102–106, 2013. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Second‐line mitoxantrone,etoposide, and cytarabine for acute myeloid leukemia: A single‐center experience

The majority of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) will require second‐line chemotherapy for either relapsed or refractory disease. Currently, only allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) offers a curative option in this setting and no preferred regimen has been established. The reported efficacy of second‐line regimens is widely disparate, thus limiting informed clinical decision making. A retrospective review of 77 patients receiving therapy between 2001 and 2008 with relapsed, 42, and refractory, 35, AML was performed to determine overall response rate and survival following mitoxantrone (8 mg/m²/day), etoposide (100 mg/m²/day), and cytarabine (1,000 mg/m²/day) chemotherapy administered over 5 days. Among 77 patients (median age of 54 years and 64% intermediate risk karyotype) with median follow‐up of 153 days, 18% achieved a complete response and 8% a morphologic leukemia‐free state. Fifty‐seven (74%) experienced treatment failure, 10 of whom achieved a remission after additional therapy. Median overall survival (OS) was 6.8 months. Among patients achieving a response, 50% received consolidation with allogeneic HCT, autologous HCT (5%), or consolidation chemotherapy alone (45%). A nonsignificant trend in overall response (50%, 27%, and 23.8%) and median OS (8.3, 6.8, and 4.7 months) was observed by cytogenetic stratification into favorable, intermediate, and unfavorable risk. Patients with refractory versus relapsed disease had similar overall responses (20% and 31%, P = 0.41) and median OS (5.3 and 7.6 months, P = 0.36). Despite risk stratification by the European Prognostic Index, our series demonstrates inferior rates of response and survival, illustrating the limited activity of this regimen in our cohort. Am. J. Hematol., 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Bortezomib and dexamethasone as salvage therapy in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: analysis of long-term clinical outcomes

Bortezomib (bort)–dexamethasone (dex) is an effective therapy for relapsed/refractory (R/R) multiple myeloma (MM). This retrospective study investigated the combination of bort (1.3 mg/m² on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 every 3 weeks) and dex (20 mg on the day of and the day after bort) as salvage treatment in 85 patients with R/R MM after prior autologous stem cell transplantation or conventional chemotherapy. The median number of prior lines of therapy was 2. Eighty-seven percent of the patients had received immunomodulatory drugs included in some line of therapy before bort–dex. The median number of bort–dex cycles was 6, up to a maximum of 12 cycles. On an intention-to-treat basis, 55 % of the patients achieved at least partial response, including 19 % CR and 35 % achieved at least very good partial response. Median durations of response, time to next therapy and treatment-free interval were 8, 11.2, and 5.1 months, respectively. The most relevant adverse event was peripheral neuropathy, which occurred in 78 % of the patients (grade II, 38 %; grade III, 21 %) and led to treatment discontinuation in 6 %. With a median follow up of 22 months, median time to progression, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 8.9, 8.7, and 22 months, respectively. Prolonged PFS and OS were observed in patients achieving CR and receiving bort–dex a single line of prior therapy. Bort–dex was an effective salvage treatment for MM patients, particularly for those in first relapse.     

Upfront lower dose lenalidomide is less toxic and does not compromise efficacy for vulnerable patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma: final analysis of the phase II RevLite study

The combination of lenalidomide and dexamethasone is an established treatment for patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Increasingly, treatment attenuation is advocated for frail/elderly patients to minimize toxicity even though there have been no prospective studies to demonstrate whether lenalidomide dose attenuation impacts on response and survival outcome. This prospective multicentre phase II study assessed the efficacy and tolerability of lower dose lenalidomide (15 mg) and dexamethasone (20 mg) in 149 eligible patients with relapsed/refractory MM aged over 59 years and/or with renal impairment. The overall response rate was 71% (complete response 15%). Median (range) progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 8·9 (6·9–11·5) and 30·5 (20·0–36·2) months, respectively. Upon formal statistical comparison of these endpoints to that of a matched cohort of patients from the pivotal phase III MM009/MM010 studies who received standard‐dose lenalidomide (25 mg) and high‐dose dexamethasone (40 mg) no difference was seen in PFS (P = 0·34) and OS (P = 0·21). Importantly, grade 3–4 toxicities were reduced with low‐dose lenalidomide, mainly lower neutropenia (29% vs. 41%), infections (23% vs. 31%) and venous thromboembolism (3% vs. 13%). This study supports a strategy of lenalidomide dose reduction at the outset for at‐risk patients, and prospectively confirms that such an approach reduces adverse events while not compromising patient response or survival outcomes.     

Treatment of diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma with secondary central nervous system involvement: encouraging efficacy using CNS‐penetrating R‐IDARAM chemotherapy

Diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma with secondary involvement of the central nervous system (SCNS‐DLBCL) is a rare condition carrying a poor prognosis. No optimal therapeutic regimen has been identified. We retrospectively analysed 23 patients with SCNS‐DLBCL treated with R‐IDARAM (rituximab 375 mg/m² IV day 1; methotrexate 12·5 mg by intrathecal injection day 1; idarubicin 10 mg/m²/day IV days 1 and 2; dexamethasone 100 mg/day IV infusion over 12 h days 1–3; cytosine arabinoside 1000 mg/m²/day IV over 1 h days 1 and 2; and methotrexate 2000 mg/m² IV over 2 h day 3. Ten out of 23 (44%) patients had CNS involvement at initial presentation (‘new disease’), 10/23 (44%) had relapsed disease and 3/23 (13%) had primary refractory disease. 14/23 (61%) of patients responded ‐ 6 (26%) complete response, 8 (35%) partial response. Grade 3–4 haematological toxicity was seen in all cycles, with no grade 3–4 or long‐term neurological toxicity. Median follow‐up for surviving patients was 49 months. At 2 years, estimated progression‐free survival (PFS) was 39% and overall survival (OS) was 52%. Encouraging outcomes were reported in patients with new disease, with 5‐year estimated PFS of 50% and OS 75%. R‐IDARAM is a well‐tolerated regimen with encouraging efficacy in patients with SCNS‐DLBCL, although patients with relapsed or refractory disease continue to fare poorly.     

Combination of bendamustine, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (BLD) in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma is feasible and highly effective: results of phase 1/2 open-label, dose escalation study

This multicenter phase 1/2 trial investigated the combination of bendamustine, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone in repeating 4-week cycles as treatment for relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Phase 1 established maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Phase 2 assessed overall response rate at the MTD. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). A total of 29 evaluable patients were enrolled. Median age was 63 years (range, 38-80 years). Median number of prior therapies was 3 (range, 1-6). MTD was bendamustine 75 mg/m(2) (days 1 and 2), lenalidomide 10 mg (days 1-21), and dexamethasone 40 mg (weekly) of a 28-day cycle. Partial response rate was 52%, with very good partial response achieved in 24%, and minimal response in an additional 24% of patients. Median follow-up was 13 months; median OS has not been reached. One-year OS is 93% (95% confidence interval [CI], 59%-99%). Median PFS is 6.1 months (95% CI, 3.7-9.4 months) with one-year PFS of 20% (95% CI, 6%-41%). Grade 3/4 adverse events included neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, hyperglycemia, and fatigue. This first phase 1/2 trial testing bendamustine, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone as treatment of relapsed refractory MM was feasible and highly active. This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01042704.     

Combination therapy with bortezomib,continuous low‐dose cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone followed by one year of maintenance treatment for relapsed multiple myeloma patients

Combination therapy for longer periods but at low dose might be an effective and tolerable manner to treat patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (MM). We used bortezomib, dexamethasone and low‐dose oral cyclophosphamide as an induction regimen, followed by 1 year of maintenance consisting of bortezomib and cyclophosphamide. Relapsed MM patients were treated with six cycles of bortezomib twice weekly, cyclophosphamide 50 mg daily and dexamethasone. Maintenance therapy was given for 1 year. Primary endpoints were toxicity during re‐induction and maintenance therapy. Secondary endpoints were response to treatment and progression‐free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). This study included 59 patients. Myelosuppression and neuropathy were the most common side effects. Median follow‐up was 27·1 (0·46–54·4) months with an overall response of 71%, and a very good partial response or more of 33%. During maintenance, improved responsiveness was observed in 19% of the patients. The median PFS was 18·4 months (range 0·13–43·5) and the median OS was 28·1 months (range 0·13–54·4). In conclusion, our study demonstrates that treatment with bortezomib, dexamethasone and low‐dose cyclophosphamide is an effective and manageable regimen. Adding 1 year of maintenance was feasible, with limited side effects and an increased response rate.     

Short progression-free survival predicts for poor overall survival in older patients with multiple myeloma treated upfront with novel agent-based therapy

Objectives: To assess the importance of the quality of response and of early relapse in unselected elderly patients with myeloma treated upfront with novel agents. Methods: We analyzed 135 unselected transplant‐ineligible patients older than 65 yr who were treated upfront with novel agent‐based regimens in a single center. Results: On intent to treat, 81% of patients achieved a response (28% sCR/CR, 23% VGPR, and 30% PR). Median progression‐free survival (PFS) for patients who achieved sCR/CR was 31 vs. 20 months for VGPR and 23 months for PR (P = 0.048). Median overall survival (OS) for patients with sCR/CR was 62 months, 53 months for VGPR and 38 months for patients with PR (P = 0.028). Early relapse (PFS < 12 months) was more common in patients with PR (39% vs. 21% for VGPR vs. 3% for sCR/CR). Patients who relapsed or progressed <12 months from initiation of treatment had a median OS of 15.4 months compared with 53 months (P < 0.001) for patients who had a PFS > 12 months despite the fact that after relapse or progression most patients were treated again with novel agents. In multivariate analysis, short PFS was the most significant adverse prognostic factor affecting OS, associated with a 7.25‐fold (P < 0.0001) increase in the risk of death. Conclusion: In newly diagnosed patients over 65 yr, treated upfront with novel agents achievement of CR and a PFS ≥12 months is associated with improved outcome. Patients who fail to respond or experience early relapse after primary therapy with novel agent‐based regimens should be encouraged to participate in clinical trials of novel agents and combinations.     

Early lymphocyte recovery predicts longer survival after autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma

To understand the prognostic value of lymphocyte recovery after autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (APBSCT), we performed a retrospective study of 59 newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients who underwent frontline APBSCT. Conditioning regimens were melphalan 100 mg/m(2) for 2 days. Following APBSCT, all patients showed complete or partial response. Median follow-up time was 29.57 months and median recovery of absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) > or =1000/mm(3) was 23 days. Univariate analysis revealed that significant predictors of overall survival (OS) included bone marrow (BM) plasma cells < or =40% at diagnosis (P=0.0243) and recovery of ALC > or =1000/mm(3) by day +23 (P=0.0156). Positive predictors for progression-free survival (PFS) were BM plasma cells < or =40% at diagnosis (P=0.0134) and recovery of ALC > or =1000/mm(3) by day +23 (P=0.0243). Absolute neutrophil count > or =1000/mm(3) on day +12 was marginally significant for OS and PFS (P=0.0821 and P=0.1153, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that ALC > or =1000/mm(3) on day +23 independently predicted OS (P=0.031) and prolonged PFS (P=0.011), and that serum beta2-microglobulin was marginally significant for prolonged OS (P=0.066). In conclusion, ALC recovery was an independent predictor of both OS and PFS in MM.     

D(T)PACE as salvage therapy for aggressive or refractory multiple myeloma

Dexamethasone ± thalidomide with infusion of cisplatin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide [D(T)PACE] is generally reserved as salvage therapy for aggressive multiple myeloma (MM) or plasma cell leukaemia (PCL) resistant to conventional therapies. The efficacy and durability of this potentially toxic regimen in this setting is unclear. We identified 75 patients who received D(T)PACE for relapsed/refractory MM at two tertiary care centres: Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto and Mayo Clinic Arizona. At time of D(T)PACE, 16 patients had PCL and three patients had leptomeningeal disease. Patients were heavily pretreated (median three prior regimens, range 1–12; prior autologous stem cell transplant [ASCT] 33%). Overall response rate was 49% (very‐good partial response 16%, partial response 33%) with stable disease in an additional 36%. Median progression‐free survival (PFS) was 5·5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]:4·3–9·8); overall survival (OS) 14·0 months (95% CI:8·7–19·3). Thirty‐five patients proceeded to ASCT or clinical trial, with median PFS for this subset of 13·4 months (95% CI:7·7–20·1) and OS 20·5 months (95% CI:14·8–63·8). D(T)PACE is an effective salvage therapy for heavily pretreated MM patients. Although the overall response rate of 49% in this poor prognosis cohort is reasonable, the PFS is short, suggesting the best role for D(T)PACE is in bridging to definitive therapy, such as transplantation.     

A phase 2, multicenter study investigating ofatumumab and bendamustine combination in patients with untreated or relapsed CLL

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of the combination of ofatumumab and bendamustine in patients with previously untreated or relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Patients received IV ofatumumab (cycle 1: 300 mg day 1 and 1,000 mg day 8; cycles 2–6: 1,000 mg on day 1 every 28 days) and IV bendamustine 90 mg m^?2 (previously untreated) or 70 mg m^?2 (relapsed) on days 1 and 2 of each 28‐day cycle, for up to 6 cycles. Forty‐four previously untreated and 53 relapsed patients were enrolled. Median age was 62.5 years (previously untreated) and 68 years (relapsed); relapsed patients had received a median of 1 (range 1–11) prior therapy. The investigator‐assessed overall response rate was 95% (43% complete response [CR]) for the previously untreated, and 74% (11% CR) for the relapsed patients. The regimen was well tolerated with 89% (previously untreated) and 85% (relapsed patients) receiving all 6 cycles. No unexpected toxicities were reported. Grade 3/4 events occurred in 57% of previously untreated, and 72% of relapsed patients. At ～29 months’ follow‐up, the median progression‐free survival (PFS) was not reached for the previously untreated population, and the 28‐month PFS estimate was 72.3%. The median PFS for the relapsed population was 22.5 months (95% CI: 14.0–27.3 months). The combination of ofatumumab and bendamustine was well tolerated and effective in these previously untreated or relapsed populations. Am. J. Hematol. 91:900–906, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Outcome after autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplantation for patients with multiple myeloma: impact of graft-versus-myeloma effect

A total of 228 patients with multiple myeloma (MM), 166 patients receiving autologous transplantation (124 PBSC and 38 BM) and 66 patients receiving T-cell-depleted allogeneic transplantation were analyzed to compare overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and risk of relapse. Patients receiving autologous transplantation had a significantly improved OS (P=0.006) and PFS (P=0.002) at 2 years with OS and PFS for autologous transplant 74% and 48%, respectively, compared with 51% and 28% for allogeneic transplantation. By 4 years after transplantation, outcome was similar with OS and PFS for autologous transplantation 41% and 23%, respectively, compared with 39% and 18% for allogeneic transplantation. The 4-year cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality was significantly higher in patients receiving allogeneic transplantation (24% vs 13%) (P=0.004). Relapse was the principle cause of treatment failure for both groups; however, there was a significantly reduced risk of relapse associated with allogeneic transplantation at 4 years: 46% for allograft vs 56% for autograft (P=0.02). Despite a lower risk of relapse after allogeneic transplantation, autologous transplantation is associated with improved OS and PFS compared with allogeneic transplantation in patients with MM. Strategies focused on reducing nonrelapse mortality in allogeneic transplantation may translate into an improved outcome for patients receiving allogeneic transplantation.     

White blood cell recovery after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation predicts clinical outcome

To determine whether outcome after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) could be estimated by using peripheral white blood cell count (WBC) as a metric that integrates several aspects of HCT recovery, we conducted a retrospective study of 1,109 adult patients who underwent first allogeneic HCT from 2003 through 2009. WBC at 1–3 months after HCT was categorized as low (<2), normal (2–10), and high (>10 × 10⁹ cells/L). Overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survival (PFS) were lower for patients with low or high WBC at 1–3 months after HCT (P < 0.0001). We developed a predictive three‐group risk model based on the pattern of WBC recovery early after HCT. Five‐year OS was 47, 30, and 15% (P < 0.0001) and 5‐year PFS was 39, 22, and 14% for patients in the three different risk groups (P < 0.0001). The pattern of WBC recovery early after HCT provides prognostic information for relapse, nonrelapse mortality, progression‐free survival, and overall survival. A scoring system based on the trajectory of the WBC in the first 3 months after HCT can effectively stratify patients into three groups with different PFS and OS. If validated, this system could be useful in the clinical management of patients after HCT, and to stratify patients enrolled on HCT clinical trials. Am. J. Hematol. 89:591–597, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Non-myeloablative allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation for relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a multicentre experience

Patients with relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who have failed or are ineligible for autologous haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) have a poor prognosis. We examined the outcomes of non-myeloablative allogeneic HCT in this setting. Thirty-one patients with DLBCL and one patient with Burkitt lymphoma received allogeneic HCT following 2 Gy total body irradiation with or without fludarabine. Median age was 52 years. Twenty-four patients (75%) had undergone prior autologous HCT. Disease status at HCT was complete response (14/32, 44%), partial response (9/32, 28%), or refractory (9/32, 28%). Cumulative incidences of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) grades II-IV, grades III-IV, and chronic GVHD were 53%, 19%, and 47% respectively. With a median follow-up of 45 months, 3-year estimated overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) was 45% and 35% respectively. Three-year cumulative incidences of relapse and non-relapse mortality were 41% and 25% respectively. In multivariate models, chemosensitive disease and receipt of >or=4 lines of treatment before HCT were associated with better OS. Patients with chemosensitive disease had 3-year OS and PFS of 56% and 43% respectively. Non-myeloablative allogeneic HCT can produce long-term disease-free survival in patients with chemosensitive relapsed DLBCL who have failed or are ineligible for autologous HCT.     

Characterisation and prognostic impact of immunoparesis in relapsed multiple myeloma

Characterisation and prognostic impact of immunoparesis in relapsed multiple myeloma (MM) is lacking in the current literature. We evaluated 258 patients with relapsed MM, diagnosed from 2008 to 2015, to investigate the prognostic impact of deep immunoparesis on post-relapse survival. On qualitative immunoparesis assessment, no, partial and full immunoparesis was present in 9%, 30% and 61% of patients, respectively. Quantitative immunoparesis was assessed by computing the average relative difference (ARD) between polyclonal immunoglobulin(s) and corresponding lower normal limit(s), with greater negative values indicating deeper immunoparesis. The median ARD was −39%, with an optimal cut-off of −50% for overall survival (OS) by recursive partitioning analysis. Deep immunoparesis (ARD ≤–50%) was associated with a higher tumour burden at first relapse compared to none/shallow [ARD >−50%] immunoparesis. The OS (P = 0·007) and progression-free survival (PFS; P < 0·001) differed significantly between the deep and none/shallow immunoparesis groups. Kaplan–Meier estimates for 3-year OS were 36% and 46%, and for 2-year PFS were 17% and 27%, respectively. On multivariable analysis (MVA) for PFS, both qualitative and quantitative immunoparesis retained negative prognostic impact independently. However, only quantitative immunoparesis was independently prognostic for OS on MVA. Depth of immunoparesis in relapsed MM is an important prognostic factor for post-relapse survival in the era of novel agents and continuous therapy.     

Long‐term outcome after allogeneic stem‐cell transplantation with reduced‐intensity conditioning in patients with multiple myeloma

This study examines the long‐term outcomes of a cohort of patients with myeloma who were treated with reduced‐intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens after a minimum follow‐up of 5 years at our centre. A total of 53 patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who received allogeneic hematopoietic stem‐cell transplantation (Allo‐SCT) between January 2000 and January 2007 were identified. The median follow‐up of living patients was 84 months (51–141). The median age of the MM patients was 50 (28–70) years. Fifty‐one patients (96%) received a transplant from a sibling donor. The median time between diagnosis and Allo‐SCT was 34 months (6–161), and the median time between auto‐SCT and Allo‐SCT was 10 months (1–89). Fifty‐one patients (96%) received at least one auto‐SCT; 24 patients (45%) received a tandem auto‐Allo‐SCT. At last follow‐up, 21 patients (40%) are alive > 5 years post RIC Allo‐SCT. At last follow‐up, 14 (26%) are in first complete remission (CR), and four patients (8%) in second CR after donor lymphocyte infusion or re‐induction with one of the new anti‐myeloma drugs (bortezomib or lenalidomide) after Allo‐SCT. Eight patients (38%) among these long survivors received one of these new drugs as induction or relapse treatment before Allo‐SCT. Disease status and occurrence of cGvHD were significantly associated with progression‐free survival (PFS); hazard ratio (HR) = 0.62 (0.30–1.29, P = 0.20). Acute GvHD was correlated with higher transplant‐related mortality; HR = 4.19 (1.05–16.77, P = 0.04). No variables were associated with overall survival (OS). In conclusion, we observe that long‐term disease control can be expected in a subset of MM patients undergoing RIC Allo‐SCT. After 10 years, the OS and PFS were 32% and 24%, respectively. The PFS curve after Allo‐SCT stabilizes in time with a plateau after 6 years post Allo‐SCT. Am. J. Hematol. 88:370–374, 2013. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.