Bilateral catheter for continuous TAP block and postoperative pain relief after gynecologic surgery

We describe the case of two patients who had undergone gynecologic surgery and in whom a continuous ropivacaine infusion was administered through a catheter placed on each abdominal side, using the technique of ultrasound-guided TAP block. Postoperative analgesia was of excellent quality with almost no morphine requirement. No side effects were encountered.     

PATHOS study on postoperative pain management in Europe: French data

Introduction

Relief of postoperative pain is a major topic of public health and has been repeatedly shown to be inadequate.

Study design

A questionnaire survey performed in seven European countries (postoperative analgesic therapy observational survey) in 746 health structures – which perform more than 80% of the total number of surgical procedures of each country – has demonstrated significant improvement when compared with previous surveys, particularly regarding increased use of multimodal analgesia and regular administration of analgesic drugs. The present study describes specific results for the 178 French health care institutions surveyed and 345 questionnaires collected. Preoperative patient information is given on a regular basis for 84% of respondents.

Results

Multimodal analgesia is used after major surgery in 87% of cases and prescribed on a regular basis for 84% of respondents. Written protocols are available in 36% of responding institutions. Pain scores are measured several times a day in 65% of institutions. An acute pain service (or any other structure with a similar aim) is found in 52% of institutions. Regular on-site training courses on pain control are delivered to 30% of anaesthesiologists, to 6% of surgeons, to 57% of recovery-room nurses and to 63% of ward nurses. Overall, the study suggests an improvement of current practices but also highlights remaining insufficiencies.

Conclusion

Important efforts remain to be done, particularly in the field of initial and continuous education of all healthcare categories as this is believed to be the only real way to obtain long-term results.     

Influence of pain on postoperative ventilatory disturbances. Management and expected benefits

Abdominal surgery induces postoperative ventilatory dysfunction related to a combination of reflex diaphragmatic inhibition, respiratory muscle injury and pain. The role of pain is difficult to isolate from other components. Thoracic epidural analgesia using local anesthetics is able to partially reverse the diaphragmatic dysfunction. However, this effect seems not directly related to analgesia. Regardless of the mechanisms, epidural analgesia has been shown to improve the postoperative ventilation and to prevent the occurrence of pulmonary complications. Pain relief, either by parenteral administration of opiate, and/or parietal blockade has been shown to improve the diaphragm motion and the overall respiratory status. All analgesic strategies may facilitate the implementation of postoperative physiotherapy which has a significant interest in preventing postoperative pulmonary complications.     

Physico-chemical stability and sterility of non-opioid analgesics in solution

Objectives

The combination of non-opioid analgesic drugs (P: paracetamol, K: ketoprofen and N: nefopam) is currently recommended for postoperative pain control. In practice, these analgesics are often administered in the same solution. We investigated the chemical stability and sterility of three mixtures of analgesics (P + K, P + N and K + N).

Methods

For each mixture, concentrations of active principles were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography over 24 hours. These mixtures were cultured for microbiological colonization.

Results

Our study demonstrated chemical and bacteriologic stability of these three mixtures over a 24-hour period. The results allow the use of P + K, P + N and K + N in the same ready to use solution.     

Pre-peritoneal continuous infusion of local anesthetics for pain relief after laparotomy. A preliminary report

INTRODUCTION: Continuous administration of local anesthetic through a catheter placed in the scar of a laparotomy is a postoperative analgesic technique, which seems effective but remains little developed and poorly codified. METHODS: In this prospective evaluation, we present a series of 25 observations of adult patients scheduled for abdominal laparotomy, to which a multiperforate catheter was placed at the end of the intervention by the surgeon in pre-peritoneal position, allowing the continuous perfusion of ropivaca?ne over the first 48 postoperative hours. Patients received intravenous paracetamol associated with ketoprophene or nefopam. Opiates were given as rescue analgesics, in case of failure in pain relief, defined on objective criteria measured on visual analogic scale (VAS). RESULTS: The feasibility of the technique was excellent, except in one case of catheter obstruction. Pain was adequately relieved, with a majority of patients having VAS scores lower than 3/10 cm with the VAS, as well as rest as during mobilization. Only 9 patients needed morphine rescue analgesics. There was no sign of clinical overdose nor parietal complication related to the technique. Blood dosages of ropivacaine, carried out among 5 patients having received 600 mg daily, showed serum concentrations below the thresholds of toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: These results reveal a good effectiveness of the method, with moderate pain intensity and a low analgesic consumption. The local and general tolerance was excellent.     

Comparison of ephedrine and ketamine in prevention of injection pain and hypotension due to propofol induction

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study compares the effects of ephedrine and ketamine on injection pain, and hypotension from propofol. METHODS: After obtaining the approval of the Ethics Committee, 75 patients (ASA I-II) scheduled for elective operations with general anaesthesia were divided into three groups. Saline 2 mL (Group S, n = 25), ketamine 0.5 mg kg(-1) (Group K, n = 25) or ephedrine 70 microg kg(-1) (Group E, n = 25) were administered over 5 s after tourniquet application. After releasing the tourniquet, propofol 2 mg kg(-1) was injected in 30 s. Pain was evaluated on a numerical scale (0-10) where 0 represented no pain and 10 the most severe pain possible. Systolic, diastolic blood pressures and heart rates were recorded preoperatively, 1 min after propofol injection, before intubation and 1, 2 and 3 min after intubation in all patients. RESULTS: The incidences of pain in Groups S, E and K were similar (84%, 80% and 72%, respectively). The mean pain score in Group K (2.1, SD 3.1) was significantly lower than those of Groups S and E (4.9, SD 2.6 and 4.6, SD, 3.3, respectively) (P < 0.05). The systolic and diastolic blood pressure values in Group K (120 +/- 27 mmHg) and Group E (123 +/- 21 mmHg) before intubation were significantly higher than that of Group S (104 +/- 25 mmHg) (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the mean heart rate values of the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Low dose ketamine or ephedrine pretreatment may prevent hypotension due to propofol induction. Despite the reduction in injection pain intensity after ketamine, the study drugs were found to be ineffective in lowering the injection pain incidence.     

Loss of volition and pain response during induction of anaesthesia with propofol or sevoflurane

We compared the time to reach two anaesthetic end-points duringinduction of anaesthesia with a potent inhalation agent (sevoflurane)and an i.v. agent (propofol). We used a method to ensure steadybreathing during inhalation induction, and measured loss oftone in the outstretched arm and loss of response to a painfulstimulus. Thirty-eight female patients (age 39 (9) yr, weight65 (11) kg, and height 165 (8) cm) (mean (SD)) were randomlyallocated to receive either propofol or sevoflurane. The predictedinduction dose of propofol, estimated from age and weight foreach patient, was given at a rate of 1% of the induction doseper second, to a possible maximum of 2.5 times the predictedinduction dose. Sevoflurane was given with an inhaled concentrationof 8%, which was anticipated to cause loss of arm tone within90–120 s. After loss of consciousness, we applied a painfulelectrical stimulus to a finger at 15-s intervals and measuredthe time to loss of motor response. The median times and interquartilevalues for loss of arm tone were 105 (88–121) s for sevofluraneand 65 (58–80) s for propofol. This was equivalent to0.65 of the ED₅₀ of propofol. The time to loss of response topain was 226 (169–300) s for sevoflurane. The variancesof these three measurements were not significantly different,indicating that these dose–response relationships weresimilar. In contrast, only 11 of the patients given propofollost the response to pain after 2.5xED₅₀ had been given. Theseresults support previous evidence of substantial differencesbetween anaesthetic end-points, and show that this evidencecan be obtained using a simple and rapid method. Br J Anaesth 2001; 87: 283–6     

Role of beta-blockade in anaesthesia and postoperative pain management after hysterectomy

Background. Perioperative use of ß-blockers has beenadvocated as a strategy to prevent cardiac sequelae. This studyevaluated the influence of perioperative esmolol administrationupon anaesthesia and postoperative pain management amongst patientsundergoing hysterectomy. Methods. Ninety-seven ASA I–II patients, undergoing abdominaltotal hysterectomy, were randomly divided into one of two groups.Patients in the Esmolol group received an i.v. loading doseof esmolol 0.5 mg kg^–1 followed by infusion of 0.05 mgkg^–1 min^–1 before anaesthesia induction. The infusionwas documented at the completion of surgery. The Control groupreceived a volume of normal saline. After surgery, all patientswere treated with patient-controlled i.v. analgesia (PCA), whichwas programmed to deliver 1 mg of morphine on demand for 3 consecutivedays. Pain intensity on movement and at rest, sedation score,and side effects were recorded. Results. The two groups were comparable with respect to theircharacteristics. Patients in the esmolol group received significantlylower end-tidal isoflurane concentrations (1.0 (0.3) vs 1.4(0.5)%, respectively; P<0.001) and fentanyl (0.9 (0.2) vs1.2 (0.5) µg kg^–1, respectively; P=0.006) duringanaesthesia. They also showed a reduced heart rate and arterialpressure response to tracheal intubation, skin incision, andtracheal extubation. The Esmolol group consumed less PCA morphinein 3 days (37.3 (8.4) vs 54.7 (11.2) mg, respectively; P=0.005).Pain intensity and medication side effects were similar in thetwo groups. Conclusion. The results suggest that perioperative esmolol administrationduring anaesthesia reduces the intraoperative use of inhalationanaesthetic and fentanyl, decreases haemodynamic responses,and reduced morphine consumption for the first 3 postoperativedays.     

The influence of cold on pain during intravenous induction of anaesthesia with propofol in children

Pain on injection and quality of induction were compared in 74 children (5–12 years) randomly assigned to receive either 5 mg·kg^?1 of cold propofol (group A), 5 mg·kg^?1 of cold propofol mixed with lignocaine 1% (group B) or 5 mg·kg^?1 of propofol at room temperature (22–23°C) mixed with lignocaine 1% (group C). The group receiving cold propofol had to be stopped due to a very high incidence of pain (70%). The incidence of pain on injection was 3% in group B and 17% in group C (not significant). Quality of induction and side-effects were similar in the two groups.     

The role of regional anaesthesia and multimodal analgesia in the prevention of chronic postoperative pain: a narrative review

Effective prevention of chronic postoperative pain is an important clinical goal, informed by a growing body of studies. Peri-operative regional anaesthesia remains one of the most important tools in the multimodal analgesic toolbox, blocking injury-induced activation and sensitisation of both the peripheral and central nervous system. We review the definition and taxonomy of chronic postoperative pain, its mechanistic basis and the most recent evidence for the preventative potential of multimodal analgesia, with a special focus on regional anaesthesia. While regional anaesthesia targets several important aspects of the mechanistic pathway leading to chronic postoperative pain, evidence for its efficacy is still mixed, possibly owing to the heterogeneity of risk profiles within the surgical patient, but also to variation in techniques and medications reported in the literature.     

Propofol combined with nitrous oxide-oxygen for induction and maintenance of anaesthesia

After a bolus of 2 mg/kg, propofol was given by continuous infusion (150 micrograms/kg/minute for 30 minutes and then 100 micrograms/kg/minute) supplemented with nitrous oxide for anaesthesia during ear surgery in 12 patients. Cardiovascular changes were not significant except for a decrease in heart rate after 60 minutes. Acid-base balance was unaffected by the amount of fatty emulsion. Cortisol levels showed a nonsignificant decrease during the prolonged administration of propofol but had recovered completely by one hour following anaesthesia. Mean blood concentrations of propofol were 10.5 micrograms/ml (SEM 1.2) at the onset of unconsciousness, between 3.4 and 4.5 micrograms/ml during continuous infusion and 2.9 micrograms/ml (SEM 0.3) on awakening. Patients opened their eyes 6 minutes (SEM 1) after discontinuation of the infusion, and were responsive at 7.5 minutes (SEM 0.5), which suggests that propofol infusion can be used safely for surgery of 2 hours' duration.     

静脉低剂量氯胺酮超前镇痛对腹腔镜胆囊切除术后苏醒和疼痛的影响

目的 观察氯胺酮切皮前给药对腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)后苏醒和疼痛的影响.方法 全麻下行LC患者80例,随机均分为两组:对照组采用雷米芬太尼复合丙泊酚麻醉;研究组在切皮前加用小剂量氯胺酮0.3 mg/kg.采用SS和VRS评分评估对苏醒时间和苏醒期躁动情况.结果 两组呼吸恢复时间、睁眼时间、拔管时间差异无统计学意义.研究组苏醒期躁动、镇痛、镇静效果显著优于对照组(P<0.05).结论 静脉低剂量氯胺酮超前镇痛用于LC术后苏醒快,术后疼痛轻,苏醒期躁动少.     

Propofol emulsion for induction and maintenance of anaesthesia. A combined technique of general and regional anaesthesia

To provide general anaesthesia with endotracheal intubation during regional blockades, three dose regimens of propofol emulsion were studied: induction 2 mg kg-1, infusion rate 9 mg kg-1 h-1 (Group 1); induction 2.5 mg kg-1, infusion rate 12 mg kg-1 h-1 (Group 2); induction 2.5 mg kg-1, infusion rate 9 mg kg-1 (Group 3). Each group comprised 10 healthy (ASA class 1 or 2) unpremedicated patients. The induction times measured from the start of injection until counting ceased (+/- 50 s) and until eye-lash reflex disappeared (+/- 80 s) showed no statistical differences between groups. In five patients in Group 1 and one patient in each of Groups 2 and 3 the induction dose was too low for intubation. Pain on injection was seen in 13 cases (mild 6, moderate 6 and severe 1). Cough accompanied by hypersalivation was the most important side-effect. Recovery times varied widely and showed no statistical differences. Answering simple questions was possible after 14 min in Group 1, 23 min in Group 2 and 19 min in Group 3. Apart from a short period of euphoria, recovery was uneventful. There was no tendency to fall asleep again. None of the combinations of induction doses and infusion rates provided good anaesthesia conditions for an acceptable number of patients.