Hepatic resections for bilobar liver metastases from colorectal cancer

The present study was performed to assess survival benefits in patients who underwent a hepatic resection for isolated bilobar liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Thirty-eight patients underwent a curative hepatic resection for isolated colorectal liver metastasis. Among them, 11 patients had bilobar liver metastases and 19 had a solitary metastasis. The remaining 8 patients had unilobar multiple lesions. We investigated survival in two groups those with bilobar and those with solitary metastatic tumors. Survival and disease-free survival were 36% and 18% at 5 years, respectively, in the patients with bilobar liver metastases, while these survivals were 43% and 34% in the patients with solitary liver metastasis. In the 38 patients, repeated hepatic resections were performed in 15 patients with recurrent liver disease. The 5-year survival and disease-free survival rates for these patients were 38% and 27%, respectively, after the second hepatic resections. Of the 11 patients with bilobar liver metastases, 5 underwent a repeated hepatic resection, and they all survived for over 42 months. Based on our observations, a hepatic resection was thus found to be effective even in selected patients with either bilobar nodules or recurrence in the remnant liver. Received: February 7, 2000 / Accepted: April 26, 2000     

Anatomical major resection versus nonanatomical limited resection for liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Although systematic anatomical hepatic resection has been reported to improve patient survival in hepatocellular carcinoma, principles of hepatectomy procedure have not been clearly demonstrated in secondary hepatic malignancy. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether selection of surgical procedures for liver resection is associated with the pattern of tumor recurrence or patient survival. METHODS: During the period of 1980 through 1999, 174 cases underwent liver resection for hepatic metastasis from colorectal cancer. Of these, 96 underwent systematic anatomical major hepatic resection (anatomical group) and 78 cases underwent nonanatomical limited resection (nonanatomical group). Subset analysis of 115 patients with unilobar single or double tumors was also conducted. RESULTS: The overall 5-year survival rate of 174 patients was 43.2%. Univariate analysis did not show a significant difference in patient survival according to surgical procedure (anatomical group versus nonanatomical group). Operative morbidity and mortality rates were slightly higher in anatomical group. From the subset analysis in unilobar single or double tumors, anatomical major hepatectomy was unnecessary in 80.4% of the cases if the tumors were resectable by nonanatomical limited resection. Ninety percent of the ipsilateral recurrence, which could have been avoided if the first operation was anatomical hemihepatectomy, could undergo second hepatectomy with 5-year survival rate of 58.3%. CONCLUSIONS: There was not a significant difference in patient survival according to surgical procedure. To minimize surgical stress and operative risk, nonanatomical limited liver resection should be a basic surgical procedure for colorectal metastases.     

Surgical and combined treatment of multiple and bilobar metastatic affection of the liver

Short- and long-term results of surgical treatment in combination with local exposures (cryo- and thermo-destruction) and adjuvant chemotherapy in patients treated for multiple and bilobar metastatic affection of the liver were studied. Postoperative lethality was 2,5% (n=2) due to liver insufficiency. Specific for liver resection complications (bile outflow, moderate hepatic failure) do not exceed 20,5%. Five-year survival of patients with solitary bilobar metastatic affection of the liver (not more than two foci) was 39,1+/-14,3%. This demonstrates that solitary bilobar hepatic metastases is not a negative prognostic factor for surgical treatment. Long-term results of treatment of patients with multiple metastases of colorectal cancer to the liver are worse, but 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival demonstrates validity of surgical policy in treatment of these patients. Postoperative chemotherapy significantly improves long-term survival of patients with multiple or/and bilobar metastases of colorectal cancer to the liver.     

Liver resection for multiple colorectal metastases: influence of parenchymal involvement and total tumor volume,vs number or location,on long-term survival

HYPOTHESIS: Multiple and/or bilateral liver metastases are not absolute contraindications to surgical resection. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: University department of surgery and transplantation. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTION: A total of 245 curative liver resections for colorectal metastases were divided into 3 groups: M1, single lesions; M2, multiple unilobar; and M3, multiple bilobar. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Univariate and multivariate analysis using several prognostic factors was performed to distinguish variables affecting long-term survival. RESULTS: Overall operative mortality was 0.8%. Overall 5-year survival was 34%. On multivariate analysis, only the percentage of hepatic involvement by the tumor significantly affected prognosis. By replacing this variable with the total tumor volume, this latter variable was the only independent predictor of survival. Patients with multiple metastases and total tumor volume less than 125 cm(3) had a significantly better outcome than patients with single nodules and total tumor volume more than 380 cm( 3). Operative mortality and morbidity were comparable among groups M1, M2, and M3. The 5-year survival was 41%, 17%, and 34%, respectively (group M1 vs M2, P =.05; group M1 vs M3 and group M2 vs M3, not significant). The 5-year survival was 41% and 23% in patients with single and multiple lesions, respectively and was 35% and 32% in patients with unilobar and bilobar lesions, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A better outcome in patients with small single lesions was shown. In patients with multiple and/or bilateral metastases, an acceptable 5-year survival superior to 20% was obtained by surgical approach. The total volume of metastases, not number and location, seems to be the strongest predictor of survival.     

Determinants of Survival following Hepatic Resection for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

p = 0.0001), resected versus nonresected ( p < 0.0001), and tumor-free surgical margins versus positive margins ( p = 0.001). Surprisingly, the disease-free interval and the original stage of the primary tumor did not predict survival ( p = not significant). Other factors that had no influence on survival were type of resection, size and number of liver metastases, ABO blood group, and the number of perioperative blood transfusions. For those patients who underwent resection of unilobar metastases with tumor-free margins, the 5-year survival rate was 29% with a median survival of 35 months and eight survivors > 7 years. In addition, one patient with bilobar disease had survival > 7 years and five patients who had resection of hepatic metastases and extrahepatic cancer simultaneously had survival > 3 years. Our data support the concept that patients with unilobar metastatic disease who undergo surgical resection with tumor-free surgical margins can be afforded a significant opportunity at long-term survival with acceptable morbidity, mortality, and hospital stay. Also, certain patients with bilobar or extrahepatic disease (or both) who undergo complete resection can enjoy a long-term survival. In these subgroups of patients resection should be considered on an individual basis.     

Synchronous Hepatic Metastases from Colon Cancer: Changing Treatment Strategies and Results of Surgical Intervention

More effective chemotherapeutic agents have broadened the role of hepatic resection in the management of patients with synchronous hepatic metastases from colon cancer. This study examines the management patterns and the role of hepatobiliary surgical evaluation in patients with synchronous stage IV colon cancer. Patients with synchronous hepatic metastases from colon cancer evaluated and treated from 1/99 to 11/04 were analyzed retrospectively. Demographic, disease-related, and treatment-related variables were reviewed and correlated with disease-specific survival (DSS). One hundred and fifty-one patients were evaluated. The majority of patients (60%) were first evaluated by a medical oncologist while 34% were first evaluated by a hepatobiliary surgeon. Ultimately, 128 patients (85%) underwent surgical evaluation and 77% of those evaluated underwent surgical intervention. Patients who underwent operative exploration ± debulking had less hepatic disease but also received more chemotherapy than patients not explored and those who never underwent hepatobiliary surgical evaluation. Sixty-eight patients (53%) who underwent hepatobiliary surgical evaluation underwent hepatic resection. Negative independent predictors of hepatic resection were bilobar metastases and extrahepatic disease found during exploration. Variables associated with improved DSS included: carcinoembryonic antigen level ≤200 ng/ml, node-negative primary tumor, ≤4 liver metastases, unilobar metastases, largest metastasis ≤5 cm, and hepatic resection. Five-year DSS following hepatic resection was 54%. We conclude that hepatobiliary surgical evaluation of patients with synchronous hepatic metastases is warranted since many are candidates for hepatic resection. A multidisciplinary treatment approach which combines both medical and surgical modalities may be associated with improved survival.     

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy as a treatment strategy for multiple bilobar liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma

Hepatic resection remains the only potentially curative therapy for patients with colorectal liver metastases. Because most have multiple bilobar liver metastases, surgical resection is possible in only 25-58% of patients with colorectal liver metastases. Currently, attention is focused on the potential for neoadjuvant chemotherapy to render formerly unresectable patients resectable. The availability of more efficacious chemotherapy agents and an inventive approach to delivery schedules have resulted in an increase in the number of candidates for hepatic resection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Although tumor response varies with regimen and/or route of chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastases, with 16-63% tumor response rates, hepatic resection for responders after neoadjuvant chemotherapy gives survival benefits, with 20-48% 5-year survival rates after surgery. Provided that neoadjuvant chemotherapy controls multiple bilobar liver metastases well, aggressive hepatic resection should be considered for patients with those lesions. As a treatment strategy for multiple bilobar liver metastases, neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a useful to increase resection rates and may contribute to the improvement of prognosis in patients with such lesions.     

Hepatic resection of colorectal metastases. Influence of clinical factors and adjuvant intraperitoneal 5-fluorouracil via Tenckhoff catheter on survival.

This report analyzes an experience with 33 hepatic resections for metastatic colorectal cancer over a 7-year period and with intraperitoneal 5-FU administered as a postresection adjuvant in 21 of these patients. Particular emphasis is placed on the identification of clinical determinants of postresection survival. There was no operative mortality in this series. Postoperative complications occurred in 27% of patients, and the incidence of complications correlated with intraoperative blood loss (p = 0.002). Two- and 4-year estimated survivals were 72% and 53%, respectively. Patients with three or fewer metastases resected or with unilobar disease had improved survival when compared with patients having more than three metastases or bilobar disease, respectively (p less than 0.05). Disease-free survival was improved in patients with microscopically negative resection margins (p = 0.019). Dukes' stage of the primary lesion, interval between bowel resection and detection of hepatic metastases, method of detection of metastases, preoperative CEA level, and type of operation performed were not predictive of postresection survival. Intraperitoneal 5-FU was well tolerated. There was a trend toward improved survival in patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, but this was not statistically significant. It is concluded that the number of metastases resected, the distribution of the metastases, and the technical adequacy of the excision are all predictive of outcome following hepatic resection of colorectal metastases. Encouraging results with the use of intraperitoneal 5-FU as a postresection adjuvant have led to the initiation of a prospective randomized trial investigating this modality at the NCI.     

Outcome after hepatic resection versus combined resection and microwave ablation for multiple bilobar colorectal metastases to the liver

BACKGROUND: We investigated the efficacy of microwave ablation plus hepatectomy for multiple bilobar colorectal metastases to the liver. No consensus exists concerning local ablation plus hepatic resection for treating multiple bilobar colorectal liver metastases, partly because of a lack of long-term comparative survival data. METHODS: Clinicopathologic data were analyzed retrospectively for 53 consecutive patients with 5 or more bilobar liver metastases from colorectal cancer who underwent hepatectomy with or without microwave ablation. Outcome measures were recurrence rate, recurrence pattern, and survival. RESULTS: Combined resection/ablation was performed more frequently in patients with more liver metastases (P = .03). No significant differences were found for overall, disease-free, or hepatic recurrence-free survival between 16 patients with resection/ablation and 37 patients with resection (P = .43, .54, and .86, respectively). Multivariate analysis selected prehepatectomy carcinoembryonic antigen concentration in serum as an independent prognosticator for survival (P = .02), but not resection/ablation versus resection. In patients with combined resection/ablation, recurrence occurred near the resection or ablation line in only 2 patient (22%), whereas multiple neoplasms (>/=4) was the most common liver recurrence pattern (78%). CONCLUSIONS: Microwave ablation plus hepatic resection expanded indications for operation to treat multiple bilobar liver metastases, with survival similar to that in less-involved hepatic resection patients.     

Surgical treatment of liver metastases from colorectal cancer

We analyze our experience over a 10-year period in the surgical treatment of liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Between 01.01.1995 and 08.31.2005 189 liver resections were performed in 171 patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer (16 re-resections - 2 in the same patient and a "two-stage" liver resection in 2 patients). In our series there were 83 patients with synchronous liver metastases (69 simultaneous resections, 12 delayed resections and 2 "two-stage" liver resection were performed) and 88 metachronous liver metastases. Almost all types of liver resections have been performed. The morbidity and mortality rates were 17.4% and 4.7%, respectively. Median survival was 28.5 months and actuarial survival at 1-, 3- and 5-year was 78.7%, 40.4% and 32.7%, respectively. Between January 2002 and August 2005 hyperthermic ablation of colorectal cancer liver metastases has been performed in 6 patients; in other 5 patients with multiple bilobar liver metastases liver resection was associated with radiofrequency ablation and one patient underwent only radiofrequency ablation for recurrent liver metastasis. In conclusion, although the treatment of colorectal cancer liver metastases is multimodal (resection, ablation, chemotherapy and radiation therapy), liver resection is the only potential curative treatment. The quality and volume of remnant liver parenchyma is the only limitation of liver resection. The morbidity, mortality and survival rates after simultaneous liver and colorectal resection are similar with those achieved by delayed resection. Postoperative outcome of patients with major hepatic resection is correlated with the surgical team experience. The long-term survival was increased using the new multimodal treatment schemes.     

Does repeated surgery improve the prognosis of colorectal liver metastases?

Hepatic resection for colorectal metastases was performed for 188 patients. Overall survival rates after the first hepatectomy are 41.4% and 32.7% for 5 and 10 years, respectively. The survival rate of 116 cases with unilobar hepatic metastases (H1) is significantly higher than those of 48 cases with two to four bilobar metastases (H2) and 24 cases with more than four (H3), respectively. However, the differences between the survival rates from H1 with multiple metastases, H2, and H3 are not significant, even though the H3 group has no 10-year survivors. The 5-year survival rates after the second hepatectomy (30 patients) and the resection of the lung (26 patients) are 30.3% and 35.2%, respectively, in this series. In those patients, the 5-year survival rates from the first metastasectomy are 43.4% and 50.3%, respectively. There are 14 5-year survivors with multiple metastases and 8 of those patients underwent multiple surgeries. There are 13 patients with three or more repeat resections of the liver and/or lung. The 5-year survival rates of the patients from the first and third metastasectomy are 53.9% and 22.5%, respectively. Repeat operations for the liver and the lung contribute to the improving prognosis. Presented at the Forty-Sixth Annual Meeting of The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Chicago, Illinois, May 14–18, 2005 (poster presentation).     

Survival After Hepatic Resection for Colorectal Metastases: A 10-Year Experience

Background Metastatic colorectal cancer is a major cause of cancer death in North America. Hepatic resection offers the potential for cure in selected patients. We report the long-term outcomes of patients who underwent hepatic resection for colorectal metastases over a 10-year period at a single hepatobiliary surgical oncology center. Methods All patients who underwent liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer between 1992 and 2002 were identified. Data were retrospectively obtained through chart review. Major outcome variables were disease-free survival and overall survival. Risk factors for disease recurrence and mortality were identified by multivariate analysis by using the Cox proportional hazard method. Results A total of 423 hepatectomies were performed for metastatic colorectal cancer. Most operations (n = 276; 65%) were major (four or more segments) hepatectomies. Perioperative morbidity occurred in 74 (17%) patients. There were seven (1.6%) perioperative deaths. The disease-free survival at 1, 5, and 10 years was 64%, 27%, and 22%, respectively. The overall survival at 1, 5, and 10 years was 93%, 47%, and 28%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified four negative predictive factors for overall survival (hazard ratio; 95% confidence interval): a positive surgical margin (2.9; 1.5–5.3), large metastases (>5 cm; 1.5; 1.1–2.0), multiple metastases (1.4; 1.1–1.9), and age >60 years (1.4; 1.1–1.9). Conclusions Hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer is safe and provides good long-term overall survival rates of 47% at 5 years and 28% at 10 years. An aggressive approach is justified by the low operative mortality rate and good long-term survival, even in individuals with multiple bilobar metastases.     

Role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of multiple colorectal metastases to the liver

BACKGROUND: The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with multiple (five or more) bilobar hepatic metastases irrespective of initial resectability is still under scrutiny. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome of hepatectomy alone with that of hepatectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for multiple bilobar hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. METHODS: Retrospective data were collected from 71 patients after hepatectomy for five or more bilobar liver tumours. The outcome of 48 patients treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by hepatectomy was compared with that of 23 patients treated by hepatectomy alone. RESULTS: Patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy had better 3- and 5-year survival rates from the time of diagnosis than those who did not (67.0 and 38.9 versus 51.8 and 20.7 per cent respectively; P = 0.039), and required fewer extended hepatectomies (four segments or more) (39 of 48 versus 23 of 23; P = 0.027). Multivariate analysis showed neoadjuvant chemotherapy to be an independent predictor of survival. CONCLUSION: In patients with bilateral multiple colorectal liver metastases, neoadjuvant chemotherapy before hepatectomy was associated with improved survival and enabled complete resection with fewer extended hepatectomies.     

Technical and biological factors in disease-free survival after hepatic resection for colorectal cancer metastases.

Careful patient selection for hepatic resection of colorectal cancer metastases is essential to improve current poor results. Carcinoembryonic antigen level and number of metastases were significant preoperative prognostic indicators of 5-year disease-free survival in patients selected clinically for hepatic surgery. Surgical margin, weight of hepatic tissue resected, carcinoembryonic antigen level, and flow cytometry were significant postoperative prognostic indicators. Patients with a carcinoembryonic antigen level less than 200 ng/mL, 1-cm surgical margins, and less than 1,000 g of liver tissue removed had a greater than 50% estimated 5-year disease-free survival rate. If the metastases were diploid on flow cytometry, an additional survival advantage may have been gained. Inadequate surgical margins led to high rates of liver-only recurrence. Nonhepatic recurrence was unrelated to surgical margins. Intraoperative liver examination by ultrasound during primary colon cancer resection and adjuvant chemotherapy may offer earlier selection of biologically appropriate patients and improved outcome; both recommendations require clinical trials.     

Is carcino-embryonic antigen useful in the follow-up management of patients with colorectal liver metastases?

BACKGROUND: The role of carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA) in monitoring early detection of recurrent or metastatic colorectal cancer, and its impact on resectability rate and patient survival remains controversial. Our objective was to determine any association between the preoperative level of CEA and prognosis, and the resectability and survival by method of diagnosis of colorectal hepatic metastases. METHODS: We analyzed patients who underwent exploration for hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer over a 15-year period. The patient population consisted of those patients who had undergone primary colon or rectal resection and were followed up with serial CEA levels and of patients who were followed up with physical examination, liver function tests (LFTs) or computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen and pelvis that led to the diagnosis of liver metastases. Also included in the study were patients who were diagnosed with liver metastases at the time of the primary colon or rectal resection and underwent planned hepatic resection at a later time. RESULTS: Three hundred and one (301) patients who underwent a total of 345 planned hepatic resections for metastatic colorectal cancer between January 1978 and December 1993 were included in this analysis. The median preoperative CEA level was 24.8 ng/mL in the resected group, 53.0 ng/mL in the incomplete resection group, and 49.1 ng/mL in the nonresected group (P = 0.02). More of the patients who had a preoperative CEA < or =30 ng/mL were in the resected group, while those who had a preoperative CEA >30 ng/mL were likely to be in the nonresected group (P = 0.002). The median survival was 25 months for patients with a preoperative CEA level < or =30 ng/mL and 17 months for patients with a preoperative CEA >30 ng/mL (P = 0.0005). The resectability rate and the survival of patients by method of diagnosing liver metastases-rising CEA versus history and physical, elevated LFTs, CT scan versus diagnosis at the time of primary resection-was not significant (P = 0.06 and P = 0.19, respectively). Given the nonstandardized retrospective nature of the study cohort and relative small groups of patients, the power to detect small differences in survival by method of diagnosis is limited. In the complete resection group of patients with unilobar liver disease (5-year survival of 28.8%) there was no difference in survival between those patients who had normal preoperative CEA and those who had elevated preoperative CEA, and approximately 90% of them had an abnormal preoperative serum CEA level. CONCLUSIONS: CEA is useful in the preoperative evaluation of patients with hepatic colorectal metastases for assessing prognosis and is complimentary to history and physical examination in the diagnosis of liver metastases. Patients with colorectal liver metastases and preoperative CEA < or =30 ng/mL are more likely to be resectable, and they have the longest survival.     

Treatment for multiple bilobar liver metastases of colorectal cancer

Background Recent advances have extended indications for hepatectomy to include multiple bilobar colorectal liver metastases (CLM). Staging systems based on the biological malignancy of primary and metastatic tumors provide appropriate indications for hepatectomy in CLM. However, suitability for resection in patients with complex and extensive hepatic metastases is controversial. Methods A medline search was performed to identify papers reporting the resection for CLM. Techniques, indication, and results were reviewed. Results If the anticipated remnant liver volume is small (25–40% of total), suggesting a high risk of postoperative liver failure, portal vein embolization (PVE) is recommended prior to hepatectomy. However, curative resections are not always possible. Specifically in synchronous multiple bilobar CLM, two-stage hepatectomy, comprising bilateral hepatectomy and primary resection with or without PVE, can prevent growth of ipsilateral metastatic nodules in the remnant liver and reduce surgical risk. Several local ablation techniques can complement surgery if hepatic resection alone increases the risk of postoperative liver failure or is not curative. Chemotherapy combined with targeted treatment can suppress recurrence and extend indications for hepatectomy by reducing the size and number of primary irresectable tumors. Conclusion PVE or staged procedure combining with local ablation or neoadjuvant, downstaging or adjuvant therapies extends indications for hepatectomy to include multiple bilobar CLM. The 5-year survival rate for multiple bilobar CLM treated with alternating hepatectomy and chemotherapy is comparable to the values reported for single and hemilateral CLM.     

Analysis of hepatic resection of metastasis originating from gastric adenocarcinoma

Few patients with metastatic gastric cancer have disease that is amenable to curative surgery. Thus far, little is known about liver surgery for metastases arising from gastric adenocarcinoma and prognostic factors. Of 73 patients operated on between 1980 and 1999 for noncolorectal, non-neuroendocrine hepatic metastases, 15 underwent liver resection for gastric adenocarcinoma metastasis. Ten patients underwent synchronous hepatic resection and five underwent metachronous hepatic surgery after a median diseasefree interval of 10 months (range 6.1 to 47.3 months). None of the patients died within the first 30 days after surgery, and the in-hospital mortality rate was 6.7%. Among patients in the synchronous group, 26.7% experienced major complications mainly associated with gastric surgery. Overall median survival was 8.8 months (range 4 to 51 months); two patients survived more than 3 years. Univariate analysis reealed that the appearance of liver metastasis synchronous vs. metachronous), the distribution of liver metastases (unilobar vs. bilobar), and the primary tumor site (proximal vs. distal) were marginally signifiant predictive factors regarding overall survival. Because of its high morbidity, synchronous liver resecion for metastases originating from gastric adenocarcinoma is rarely followed by survival longer than 2 years. Primary tumor localization within the proximal third of the stomach and bilobar liver involvement appear to be predictive of poor outcome. On the other hand, curative resection of metachronous liver metastases may allow long-term survival in selected patients.     

浸润其他器官及局部复发结、直肠癌的手术治疗

目的：探讨浸润其他器官及局部复发大肠癌手术治疗的效果及手术治疗的要点。方法：回顾性分析本院１９７５年～１９９８年收治的浸润其他器官及局部复发大肠癌的局部浸润情况及合并切除率,直接法统计生存率。结果：①联合切除情况： １１６６例结肠癌中属Ｄｕｋｅｓ Ｄ期者１２３例,占１０．６％,行联合切除者４１例,占全部病例的３．５％,Ｄｕｋｅｓ Ｄ期病例的３３．３％;２ ３５６例直肠癌中属Ｄｕｋｅｓ Ｄ期者３０５例占１２．９％,行联合切除者１１７例,占全部病例的５．０％,Ｄｕｋｅｓ Ｄ期病例的３８．３％。②４１例结肠癌病人合并切除后的５年生存率为５３．８％。③１１７例直肠癌病人合并全盆腔器官切除者２７例,５年生存率为３３．３％（９／２７）,９０例联合部分器官切除后病人的５年生存率为４６．７％（４２／９０）。结论：对浸润其他器官及局部复发大肠癌病人,不论初发或复发,只要病人全身条件具备,应积极采用手术治疗的方法,对延长病人的生存期有重要意义。     

Clinicopathological Features and Prognosis in Resectable Synchronous and Metachronous Colorectal Liver Metastasis

Introduction Hepatic resection may offer long-term survival for patients with colorectal metastases. However, controversies exist regarding the prognostic factors. Herein, the impact of synchronicity of liver metastasis on patient clinicopathological features and prognosis was evaluated. Methods One hundred and fifty-five patients who underwent hepatectomy for colon cancer metastasis, from 1995 to 2004, were enrolled in this study. Patients were divided into two groups: synchronous and metachronous colorectal liver metastasis. Patient demographics, the nature of the primary and metastatic tumors, surgery-related complications, and long-term outcome were analyzed. Results Patients included in the synchronous group tended to be younger than those in the metachronous group. Compared to the metachronous group, patients in the synchronous group showed more metastases (P = 0.008) and bilobarly distributed metastases (P = 0.016). Bile leakage was the most common surgical complication. The estimated 5-year disease-free and overall survival rates were 16.8 and 41.1%, respectively. Univariate analysis indicated that synchronous metastases, advanced stage of the primary tumor, bilobar distribution of the metastases, more than three metastases, and colonic versus rectal location of the primary tumor were prognostic factors of shorter disease-free survival, but not overall survival. Multivariate analysis revealed that synchronous metastases and the advanced stage of the primary tumor were indicators for a worse disease-free survival. Conclusion The synchronous presence of primary colon cancer and liver metastasis may indicate a more disseminated disease status and is associated with a shorter disease-free survival than metachronous metastasis. These patients may need more careful monitoring and aggressive chemotherapy following curative resection.     

Hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases. Influence on survival of preoperative factors and surgery for recurrences in 80 patients.

This report analyses an experience with 80 liver resections for metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Primary colorectal cancers had all been resected. Liver metastases were solitary in 44 patients, multiple in 36 patients, unilobar in 76 patients, and bilobar in 4 patients. Tumor size was less than 5 cm in 33 patients, 5-10 cm in 30 patients, and larger than 10 cm in 17 patients. There were 43 synchronous and 37 metachronous liver metastases with a delay of 2-70 months. The surgical procedures included more major liver resections (55 patients) than wedge resections (25 patients). Portal triad occlusion was used in most cases, and complete vascular exclusion of the liver was performed for resection of the larger tumors. In-hospital mortality rate was 5%. Three- and 5-year survival rates were 40.5% and 24.9%, respectively. None of the analysed criteria: size and number of liver metastases, delay after diagnosis of the primary cancer, Duke's stage, could differentiate long survivors from patients who did not benefit much from liver surgery due to early recurrence. Recurrences were observed in 51 patients during the study, two thirds occurring during the first year after liver surgery. Eight patients had resection of "secondary" metastases after a first liver resection: two patients for extrahepatic recurrences and six patients for liver recurrences. Encouraging results raise the question of how far agressive surgery for liver metastases should go.