The UGT1A1128 polymorphism correlates with erlotinib’s effect on SN-38 glucuronidation

The combination of irinotecan and erlotinib has been evaluated in clinical trials, although toxicity has been significant. We aimed to investigate the effect of erlotinib on SN-38 glucuronidation and the association between UGT1A polymorphisms and SN-38 glucuronidation activity in the presence of erlotinib. The inhibitory effect of erlotinib on SN-38 glucuronidation was determined by measuring the formation rates for SN-38 glucuronide, using recombinant human UGT1A1, pooled human liver microsomes (HLMs) and 52 Caucasian liver microsomes in the absence or presence of erlotinib. Inhibition kinetic studies were conducted. AUC ratios were used to predict the risk of potential drug–drug interactions (DDI) in vivo. Our data showed that erlotinib exhibited potent non-competitive inhibition against SN-38 glucuronidation in pooled HLMs and UGT1A1. Using the physiological and pharmacokinetic parameters obtained from the literature, we estimated the in vivo concentrations of unbound erlotinib available for UGT1A1 active site and thus the AUC ratios of SN-38 were also quantitatively predicted. It is estimated that erlotinib administered at 50 mg/day or higher doses may result in at least a 24% increase in SN-38 AUC. Significant correlations were observed between SN-38 glucuronidation activity in the presence of erlotinib and UGT1A1128 in 52 Caucasian liver microsomes. Our results suggest that erlotinib is a potent inhibitor of SN-38 glucuronidation via UGT1A1 inhibition. The coadministration of erlotinib with irinotecan may result in clinically significant DDI. UGT1A1128 polymorphism correlates with erlotinib’s effect on SN-38 glucuronidation. The present findings shed light on the development and optimisation of combinations involving irinotecan and erlotinib.     

Panipenem does not alter the pharmacokinetics of the active metabolite of irinotecan SN-38 and inactive metabolite SN-38 glucuronide (SN-38G) in rats

The present study has investigated the effect of panipenem, a widely used antibiotic, on the pharmacokinetics of an active metabolite of irinotecan (CPT-11), 7-ethyl-10-hydroxy-camptothecin (SN-38) and SN-38 glucuronide (SN-38G) produced by uridine-diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A isoform-mediated glucuronidation in rats. Rats received a 1 h infusion with panipenem at a loading dose of 10 mg/kg and a maintenance dose of 15 mg/min/kg once a day for 5 days. When the effect of pretreatment with panipenem on glucuronidation activities of substrates for hepatic UGT1A isoforms was investigated using substrates 4-methylumbelliferone (4MU), estradiol and SN-38, the rate of 4MU glucuronide formation was significantly increased, but that of estradiol glucuronide formation was unchanged. However, the rate of SN-38G formation showed a tendency to increase. One hour after the final infusion of panipenem or saline, SN-38 (2 mg/kg) was administered intravenously in rats with or without bile duct cannulation. Pretreatment with panipenem had no effect on the plasma concentration-time curves and biliary excretion of SN-38 and SN-38G in rats with and without bile duct cannulation. There were also no significant differences in the relative extent of glucuronidation of SN-38 to SN-38G (AUC(2 h, SN-38G)/AUC(2 h, SN-38)) between panipenem-treated and untreated rats. These findings suggest that pretreatment with panipenem does not alter the pharmacokinetics of SN-38 and SN-38G, suggesting the possibility that panipenem can be used safely for cancer patients undergoing irinotecan chemotherapy.     

Effects of ketoconazole on glucuronidation by UDP-glucuronosyltransferase enzymes.

PURPOSE: Ketoconazole has been shown to inhibit the glucuronidation of the UGT2B7 substrates zidovudine and lorazepam. Its effect on UGT1A substrates is unclear. A recent study found that coadministration of irinotecan and ketoconazole led to a significant increase in the formation of SN-38 (7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecine), an UGT1A substrate. This study investigates whether ketoconazole contributes to the increase in SN-38 formation by inhibiting SN-38 glucuronidation. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: SN-38 glucuronidation activities were determined by measuring the rate of SN-38 glucuronide (SN-38G) formation using pooled human liver microsomes and cDNA-expressed UGT1A isoforms (1A1, 1A7 and 1A9) in the presence of ketoconazole. Indinavir, a known UGT1A1 inhibitor, was used as a positive control. SN-38G formation was measured by high-performance liquid chromatograph. RESULTS: Ketoconazole competitively inhibited SN-38 glucuronidation. Among the UGT1A isoforms screened, ketoconazole showed the highest inhibitory effect on UGT1A1 and UGT1A9. The K(i) values were 3.3 +/- 0.8 micromol/L for UGT1A1 and 31.9 +/- 3.3 micromol/L for UGT1A9. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that ketoconazole is a potent UGT1A1 inhibitor, which seems the basis for increased exposure to SN-38 when coadministered with irinotecan.     

UGT1A1 genotypes and glucuronidation of SN-38, the active metabolite of irinotecan

Background: Irinotecan (CPT-11) is metabolized by esterase to form a SN-38, which is further conjugated by UGT1A1. Genetic polymorphism has been shown in a promoter region of UGT1A1 and is related to its activity. We investigated whether there might be an inter-individual difference in pharmacokinetics of SN-38 and its glucuronide, depending on the genotypes of UGT1A1.Patients and methods: Nine male patients with lung cancer were treated with irinotecan (50 mg/m²) and carboplatin. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated with full sampling plasma data. Genotypes were determined by analyzing the sequence of TATA box of UGT1A1 of genomic DNA from the patients.Results: The genotyping analysis revealed one heterozygote (6/7) and one homozygote (7/7) for (TA)₇TAA allele (UGT1A1^*28). The remaining seven patients were homozygote for (TA)₆TAA allele (6/6, wild type). The metabolic ratios (SN-38/SN-38 glucuronide) in the patient with 7/7 genotype were uncharacteristically higher than those in the patients with other genotypes (6/6 and 6/7). Biliary index was 6980 versus 2180 ± 1110 (range 840–3730) in patients with 7/7 versus 6/6 genotypes, respectively.Conclusion: These results support the idea that the patient with 7/7 genotype has an impaired capacity for glucuronidation of SN-38.     

Pharmacogenetic impact of polymorphisms in the coding region of the UGT1A1 gene on SN-38 glucuronidation in Japanese patients with cancer

Pharmacogenetic testing for UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A1*28, a promoter variant of the UGT1A1 gene, is now carried out clinically to estimate the risk of irinotecan-associated toxicity. We studied the clinical significance of UGT1A1*6 and UGT1A1*27, two variants in exon 1 of the UGT1A1 gene that are found mainly in Asians. The study group comprised 46 Japanese patients who received various regimens of chemotherapy including irinotecan at doses from 50 to 180 mg/m(2). Pharmacogenetic relationships were explored between the UGT1A1 genotype and the ratio of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of the active metabolite of irinotecan (SN-38) to that of SN-38 glucuronide (SN-38G), used as a surrogate for UGT1A1 activity (AUC(SN-38)/AUC(SN-38G)). No patient was homozygous for UGT1A1*28, and none had UGT1A1*27. Two were heterozygous for UGT1A1*28. Two were homozygous and 15 heterozygous for UGT1A1*6, all of whom were wild type with respect to UGT1A1*28. Two patients were simultaneously heterozygous for UGT1A1*28 and UGT1A1*6, present on different chromosomes. The other 25 patients had none of the variants studied. The two patients simultaneously heterozygous for UGT1A1*28 and UGT1A1*6 and the two patients homozygous for UGT1A1*6 had significantly higher AUC(SN-38)/AUC(SN-38G) ratios than the others (P = 0.0039). Concurrence of UGT1A1*28 and UGT1A1*6, even when heterozygous, altered the disposition of irinotecan remarkably, potentially increasing susceptibility to toxicity. Patients homozygous for UGT1A1*6 should also be carefully monitored. UGT1A1 polymorphisms in the coding region of the UGT1A1 gene should be genotyped in addition to testing for UGT1A1*28 to more accurately predict irinotecan-related toxicity, at least in Asian patients.     

Pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and its metabolites in pediatric cancer patients: a report from the children’s oncology group

Objective  To develop a population pharmacokinetic model of irinotecan and its major metabolites in children with cancer and to identify covariates that predict variability in disposition. Methods  A population pharmacokinetic model was developed using plasma concentration data from 82 patients participating in a multicenter Pediatric Oncology Group (POG) single agent phase II clinical trial. Patients between 1 and 21 years of age with solid tumors refractory to standard therapy received irinotecan, 50 mg/m², as a 60-min intravenous infusion for 5 consecutive days every 3 weeks. Blood samples were collected and analyzed for irinotecan and three metabolites (SN-38, SN-38G, and APC). The population model was developed with NONMEM. Clearance and volume were scaled allometrically using corrected body weight. Exponential error models were used to describe the interindividual variance in pharmacokinetic parameters, and the residual error was described with a proportional model. Significant covariate effects were identified graphically using S-PLUS and were added to the base-model. The final model was evaluated by simulating data from two other POG trials. Results  The best structural model for irinotecan and its metabolites consisted of six-compartments: two compartments for irinotecan and SN-38, and one each for APC and SN-38G. Age and bilirubin were found to be significant covariates affecting SN-38 clearance. SN-38 clearance was greater in patients less than 10 years of age and lower in patients with a total serum bilirubin >0.6 mg/dL. Simulations revealed that the model was able to predict drug and metabolite exposure (AUC) for patients receiving the same or similar doses (30–65 mg/m²) of irinotecan. Conclusions  This population model accurately describes the pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and its primary metabolites. The model, which includes age and bilirubin as covariate effects on SN-38 clearance, is the first population model to describe the pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and its major metabolites in children. Supported in part by: NICHD 5 U10 HD037242-09, NIH M01 RR000188-43, NCI U01 CA57745, NCI U10 CA98453, NCRR M01 RR00188-37, The Mitchell Ross Children’s Cancer Fund, Pharmacia/Upjohn.     

Factors involved in prolongation of the terminal disposition phase of SN-38: clinical and experimental studies.

The active metabolite of irinotecan (CPT-11), 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (SN-38), is either formed through enzymatic cleavage of CPT-11 by carboxyl esterases (CEs) or through cytochrome P-450 3A-mediated oxidation to 7-ethyl-10-[4-(1-piperidino)-1-amino] carbonyloxycamptothecin (NPC) and a subsequent conversion by CE. In the liver, SN-38 is glucuronidated (SN-38G) by UGT1A1, which also conjugates bilirubin. Fourteen patients were treated with 350 mg/m2 CPT-11, and we performed pharmacokinetic analysis during a 500-h collection period. The half-life and area under the plasma concentration-time curve of SN-38 were 47+/-7.9 h and 2.0+/-0.79 microM x h, respectively, both representing a 2-fold increase as compared with earlier reported estimates (A. Sparreboom et al, Clin. Cancer Res., 4: 2747-2754, 1998). As an explanation for this phenomenon, we noted substantial formation of SN-38 from CPT-11 and NPC by plasma CE, consistent with the low circulating levels of NPC observed. In addition, transport studies in Caco-2 monolayers indicated that nonglucuronidated SN-38 could cross the membrane from apical to basolateral, indicating the potential for recirculation processes that can prolong circulation times. Interestingly, individual levels of fecal beta-glucuronidase, which is known to mediate SN-38G hydrolysis, were not related to any of the SN-38 kinetic parameters (r = 0.09; P = 0.26), suggesting that interindividual variation in this enzyme is unimportant in explaining SN-38 pharmacokinetic variability. We have also found, in contrast to earlier data, that SN-38G/SN-38 plasma concentration ratios decrease over time from approximately 7 (up to 50 h) to approximately 1 (at 500 h). This decrease could be explained by the fact that glucuronidation of SN-38 and bilirubin is increasingly competitive at lower drug levels. In addition, no evidence was found for SN-38G transport through the Caco-2 cells. Our findings indicate that until now the circulation time of SN-38 has been underestimated. This is of crucial importance to our understanding of the clinical action of CPT-11 and for future pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships.     

Clinical Observations on Associations Between the UGT1A1 Genotype and Severe Toxicity of Irinotecan

Background: Severe toxicity is commonly observed in cancer patients receiving irinotecan (CPT-11)UDPglucuronosyltransferase1A1 (UGT1A1) catalyzes the glucuronidation of the active metabolite SN-38 but therelationship between UGT1A1 and severe toxicity remains unclear. Our study aimed to assess this point to guideclinical use of CPT-11. Materials and Methods: 89 cancer patients with advanced disease received CPT-11-basedchemotherapy for at least two cycles. Toxicity, including GI and hematologic toxicity was recorded in detail andUGT1A1 variants were genotyped. Regression analysis was used to analyse relationships between these variablesand tumor response. Results: The prevalence of grade III-IV diarrhea was 10.1%, this being more common inpatients with the TA 6/7 genotype (5 of 22 patients, 22.7%) (p<0.05). The prevalence of grade III-IV neutropeniawas 13.4%and also highest in patients with the TA 6/7 genotype (4 of 22 patients; 18.2%) but without significance(p>0.05). The retreatment total bilirubin levels were significantly higher in TA6/7 patients (mean, 12.75μmol/L)with compared to TA6/6 (mean, 9.92 μmol/L) with p<0.05. Conclusions: Our study support the conclusion thatpatients with a UGT1A1*28 allele (s) will suffer an increased risk of severe irinotecan-induced diarrhea, whetherwith mid-or low-dosage. However, the UGT1A1*28 allele (s) did not increase severe neutropenia. Higher serumtotal bilirubin is an indication that patients UGT1A1 genotype is not wild-type, with significance for clinic usageof CPT-11.     

Pharmacokinetic, metabolic, and pharmacodynamic profiles in a dose-escalating study of irinotecan and cisplatin.

PURPOSE: To investigate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of irinotecan and cisplatin administered once every 3 weeks in a dose-escalating study in patients with solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-two cancer patients were treated with irinotecan administered as a 90-minute infusion at doses ranging from 175 to 300 mg/m(2) followed by cisplatin administered as a 3-hour intravenous infusion at doses ranging from 60 to 80 mg/m(2). After reaching the maximum-tolerated dose, the sequence of drug administration was revised. For pharmacokinetic analysis, serial plasma samples were obtained on days 1 through 3 of the first cycle. Forty-five patients were assessable for irinotecan pharmacokinetics, and 46 were assessable for cisplatin pharmacokinetics. RESULTS: Irinotecan and cisplatin demonstrated linear pharmacokinetics comparable to that observed with single-agent administration, which suggests an absence of pharmacokinetic interaction. SN-38G constituted the major plasma metabolite of irinotecan, whereas 7-ethyl-10-[4-N-(1-piperidino)1-amino]-carbonyloxycamptothecine (NPC) was only a minor metabolite in plasma, possibly indicating a rapid conversion of NPC to SN-38. The terminal elimination phases of SN-38 and SN-38G were similar and relatively delayed when compared with the elimination of irinotecan. Maximal DNA adduct formation did not significantly differ from that observed with single-agent administration. The percentage decrease in WBC was significantly related to the areas under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUCs) of the lactone form of irinotecan (P =.0245) and SN-38 (P =. 0123). The severity of diarrhea was not significantly related to the AUCs of irinotecan and SN-38, nor to the systemic glucuronidation rate of SN-38. CONCLUSION: There was no apparent pharmacokinetic interaction between irinotecan and cisplatin in this study. Reversion of the administration sequence of the drugs did not seem to have any influence on the pharmacokinetics. The incidence and severity of delayed-type diarrhea was not related to any of the studied parameters.     

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of irinotecan and its metabolites from plasma and saliva data in patients with metastatic digestive cancer receiving Folfiri regimen

Purpose: Irinotecan is extensively metabolized into at least four compounds and previous pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic studies have given varying results. We hypothesized that saliva, a noninvasive, safe and painless biological sampling process, could be a good predictor of the behavior of irinotecan and its metabolites. Methods: Thirty-five patients with metastatic digestive cancer were treated with a Folfiri regimen every 2 weeks. The irinotecan-administered dose was 180 mg/m²; 17 patients participated in a dose-escalating study. Irinotecan and its metabolites (SN-38, SN-38G, APC, NPC) were quantified in plasma and saliva by high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection. Results: The mean irinotecan systemic clearance and steady-state volume of distribution values were 14.3 l/h/m² and 211 l/m², respectively. The intrapatient variability (22–28%) was far lower than the interindividual variability (33–88%). Age and weight were the two physiological parameters that influenced drug disposition. For irinotecan, SN-38, APC and NPC, similar pharmacokinetic profiles were observed from plasma and saliva data. The saliva/plasma AUC ratios averaged 1 for irinotecan, 0.3 for SN-38, 0.17 for APC and 0.27 for NPC. Neutropenia, diarrhea and nausea were the main toxicities encountered. From both plasma and saliva data, the percentage decrease in neutrophil count appeared to be related to irinotecan and SN-38 AUCs. Conclusions: All these findings provide a rationale for an individual adaptation of irinotecan dosing. In case of difficult venous access, the titration of irinotecan and of its active metabolite SN-38 in saliva may prove relevant.     

Genetic variants in the UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 gene predict the risk of severe neutropenia of irinotecan.

PURPOSE: Severe toxicity is commonly observed in cancer patients receiving irinotecan. UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1) catalyzes the glucuronidation of the active metabolite SN-38. This study prospectively evaluated the association between the prevalence of severe toxicity and UGT1A1 genetic variation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-six cancer patients with advanced disease refractory to other treatments received irinotecan 350 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks. Toxicity and pharmacokinetic data were measured during cycle 1. UGT1A1 variants (-3279G>T, -3156G>A, promoter TA indel, 211G>A, 686C>A) were genotyped. RESULTS: The prevalence of grade 4 neutropenia was 9.5%. Grade 4 neutropenia was much more common in patients with the TA indel 7/7 genotype (3 of 6 patients; 50%) compared with 6/7 (3 of 24 patients; 12.5%) and 6/6 (0 of 29 patients; 0%) (P =.001). The TA indel genotype was significantly associated with the absolute neutrophil count nadir (7/7 < 6/7 < 6/6, P =.02). The relative risk of grade 4 neutropenia was 9.3 (95% CI, 2.4 to 36.4) for the 7/7 patients versus the rest of the patients. Pretreatment total bilirubin levels (mean +/- standard deviation) were significantly higher in patients with grade 4 neutropenia (0.83 +/- 0.08 mg/dL) compared to those without grade 4 neutropenia (0.47 +/- 0.03 mg/dL; P <.001). The -3156G>A variant seemed to distinguish different phenotypes of total bilirubin within the TA indel genotypes. The -3156 genotype and the SN-38 area under the concentration versus time curve were significant predictors of ln(absolute neutrophil count nadir; r(2) = 0.51). CONCLUSION: UGT1A1 genotype and total bilirubin levels are strongly associated with severe neutropenia, and could be used to identify cancer patients predisposed to the severe toxicity of irinotecan. The hypothesis that the -3156G>A variant is a better predictor of UGT1A1 status than the previously reported TA indel requires further testing.     

Irinotecan and uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 pharmacogenetics: to test or not to test, that is the question

Pharmacogenetic research indicates a relationship between a polymorphism in the gene encoding uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1) and irinotecan inactivation, in that degradation of SN-38, the active metabolite of irinotecan, correlates inversely with the number of TA repeats in the TATA element of the UGT1A1 promoter region. Individuals who are homozygous for the UGT1A1*28 allele (7 repeats) may exhibit reduced degradation of SN-38 and increased probability of severe toxicities. Clinical study results, as reported in the literature, have not been uniform, however, in showing a relation between genotype and the development of toxicities. Even when correlations are statistically significant, confidence intervals are wide, rendering assessment of individual risk difficult at best. Irinotecan labeling recommends testing for the UGT1A1*28 allele and reducing irinotecan dosing in patients who are positive to reduce the likelihood of dose-limiting neutropenia only, but not diarrhea. Importantly, both dose-limiting neutropenia and diarrhea are dependent on numerous known and unknown factors, such as the specific regimen used, duration of therapy, doses, cycle of treatment, and complexities of irinotecan pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics, including other key enzymes and drug transporters. Guidance on how to modify irinotecan dosing or how to incorporate the impact of multiple variables into clinical decision-making does not exist. Furthermore, pharmacogenomic test results at this time can only provide an estimate of risk for subsets of populations rather than a risk-benefit estimate for an individual. Consequently, these test results are supplementary to clinical judgment, which requires assessing multiple variables that contribute to phenotype to arrive at individual dosing decisions.     

Integrated pharmacogenetic prediction of irinotecan pharmacokinetics and toxicity in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

To define an integrated pharmacogenetic model for predicting irinotecan pharmacokinetic (PK) and severe toxicity, we evaluated multivariate analysis using 15 polymorphisms within seven genes with putative influence on metabolism and transport of irinotecan. A total of 107 NSCLC patients treated with irinotecan were evaluated for PK and genotyped for the UGT1A1*6, UGT1A1*28, UGT1A9*22, ABCB11236C>T, 2677G>T/A, 3435C>T, ABCC2-24C>T, 1249G>A, 3972C>T, ABCG234G>A, 421C>A, and SLCO1B1 -11187G>A, 388A>G, and 521T>C, and CYP3A5*3 polymorphisms. Multivariate linear and logistic regression analyses including genotypes and clinicopathologic factors were performed. SN-38 AUC was significantly correlated with ANCs (r=-0.3, p=0.009) and grade 4 neutropenia (p=0.01). The UGT1A1*6/*6, UGT1A9*1/*1 or *1/*22, and SLCO1B1 521TC or CC genotypes, and female-gender were predictive for higher AUC(SN-38) in multivariate analysis. Among them, SLCO1B1 521TC or CC and UGT1A1*6/*6 genotypes were independently predictive for grade 4 neutropenia in multivariate analysis (OR=3.8 and 7.4, respectively). Although no significant association was observed between PK parameters and grade 3 diarrhea, UGT1A9*1/*1, ABCC23972CC, and ABCG234GA or AA genotypes were independently predictive for grade 3 diarrhea in multivariate analysis (OR=6.3, 5.6, and 5.1, respectively). Patient selection based on integrated pharmacogenetic model would be helpful for predicting irinotecan-PK and severe toxicities in NSCLC patients.     

Irinotecan Therapy in a 12-year-old Girl with Recurrent Brain Stem Glioma and without Functional Polymorphisms in UGT1A1 Activity: Case Report

Summary A 10-year-old girl was diagnosed with astrocytoma grade 2. Immuno-chemo-radiotherapy (interferon, ranimustine, and radiation), second-line chemotherapy (carboplatin and etoposide, 7 cycles) and third-line chemotherapy (ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide) was given to treat progressive disease. Finally, irinotecan therapy was initiated and led to dramatic clinical improvement. Irinotecan is metabolized by carboxylesterase to form an active SN-38, which is further conjugated and detoxified by UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) to yield its β-glucuronide. The polymorphic UGT isoenzyme, UGT1A1 has genetic variants which decrease in SN-38 glucuronidating capacity and could help predict irinotecan-associated toxicity. The patient suffered excessive toxicity with low-dose irinotecan although no functional polymorphism in UGT1A1 was identified. We suggest that irinotecan offers an effective treatment option for children with recurrent brain stem glioma and other genetic variants except UGT1A1 may be a risk factor for irinotecan-induced toxicity.     

Modulation of glucuronidation of SN-38, the active metabolite of irinotecan, by valproic acid and phenobarbital

 Purpose: Irinotecan (CPT-11) is hydrolyzed to its active metabolite SN-38 which is subsequently conjugated by uridine diphosphate glucuronosyl transferase (UDP-GT) to the glucuronide (SN-38G). Both preclinical and clinical data indicate that conjugation is a primary clearance mechanism for SN-38 with the plasma glucuronide levels being substantially higher than those of SN-38. This investigation was designed to determine the possibility of modulation of glucuronidation of SN-38 and its effect on the disposition of the parent drug and metabolites. Methods: Female Wistar rats were pretreated with 200 mg/kg valproic acid (VPA), an inhibitor of glucuronidation, 5 min prior to the administration of 20 mg/kg irinotecan. The control rats were given 20 mg/kg irinotecan only. To study the effect of inducers of UDP-GT activity, rats were pre- treated with phenobarbital (PB) before irinotecan administration. Results: Pretreatment with VPA caused a 99% inhibition in the formation of SN-38G leading to a 270% increase in the area under plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of SN-38 compared with the control rats. The irinotecan estimations were unchanged in the two groups. PB pretreatment caused a 1.7-fold increase in the AUC of SN-38G and a concomitant 31% and 59% reduction in the AUCs of SN-38 and irinotecan, respectively. Conclusions: The most plausible explanation for the alterations in SN-38G disposition is inhibition of SN-38 conjugation by VPA and induction of the conjugation by PB. Received: 5 February 1996 / Accepted: 30 July 1996     

UGT1A1 gene variations and irinotecan treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

SN-38 is the active metabolite of irinotecan and it is metabolised through conjugation by uridine diphosphate glucuronosyl transferase (UGT1A1). The major toxicity of irinotecan therapy is diarrhoea, which has been related to the enzymatic activity of UGT1A1. We examined the influence of the UGT1A1 gene promoter polymorphism in the toxicity profile, in the response rate and in the overall survival (OS) in 95 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with an irinotecan-containing chemotherapy. Genotypes were determined by analysing the sequence of TATA box of UGT1A1 of genomic DNA from the patients. Clinical parameters and genotypes were compared by univariate and multivariate statistical methods. The more frequent adverse effects were asthenia (34 patients), diarrhoea (29 patients) and neutropenia (20 patients). Severe diarrhoea was observed in 7/10 homozygous (70%) and 15/45 heterozygous (33%) in comparison to 7/40 (17%) wild-type patients (P=0.005). These results maintained the statistical significance in logistic regression analysis (P=0.01) after adjustment for other clinical relevant variables. The presence of severe haematological toxicity increased from wild-type patients to UGT1A1(*)28 homozygotes, but without achieving statistical significance. No relationship was found between the UGT1A1(*)28 genotypes and infection, nausea or mucositis. In univariate studies, patients with the UGT1A1(*)28 polymorphism showed a trend to a poorer OS (P=0.09). In the multivariate analysis, the genotype was not related to clinical response or to OS. The role of the UGT1A1 genotype as a predictor of toxicity in cancer patients receiving irinotecan demands the performance of a randomized trial to ascertain whether genotype-adjusted dosages of the drug can help to establish safe and effective doses not only for patients with the UGT1A1(*)28 homozygous genotype but also for those with the most common UGT1A1 6/6 or 6/7 genotype.     

Usefulness of one-point plasma SN-38G/SN-38 concentration ratios as a substitute for UGT1A1 genetic information after irinotecan administration

Background

It was recently reported that genetic polymorphisms of UDP glucuronyltransferase-1 polypeptide A1 (UGT1A1), a glucuronidation enzyme, were associated with irinotecan (CPT-11) metabolism. The active metabolite of CPT-11, 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (SN-38) was glucuronidated (SN-38G) by UGT1A1. Genetic polymorphisms of UGT1A1 were associated with potentially serious adverse events, including neutropenia. Several studies have suggested that the dose of CPT-11 should be decreased in patients homozygous for UGT1A1*6 or UGT1A1*28, or double heterozygotes (*6/*28). However, the reference dose for patients with these genetic polymorphisms is unclear.

Methods

We investigated the relationship between the SN-38G/SN-38 concentration ratio and the dose of CPT-11 in 70 patients with colorectal cancer who received FOLFIRI-based regimens, by measuring the plasma concentrations of CPT-11, SN-38, and SN-38G.

Results

The SN-38G/SN-38 concentration ratio was lower in patients who were homozygous for UGT1A1*6, heterozygous for UGT1A1*6 or UGT1A1*28, or were double heterozygotes compared with patients with wild-type genes. The relative decreases in the SN-38G/SN-38 concentration ratio in patients homozygous for UGT1A1*6 and in double heterozygotes were greater than in patients heterozygous for UGT1A1*6 or UGT1A1*28. Interestingly, decreases in the SN-38G/SN-38 concentration ratio were associated with decreases in the neutrophil count and the final infusion dose of CPT-11.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that the SN-38G/SN-38 concentration ratio is an important factor for guiding dose adjustments, even in patients with wild-type genes. Therefore, the SN-38G/SN-38 concentration ratio, as an index of the patient’s metabolic capacity, is useful for assessing dose adjustments of CPT-11.     

Effect of milk thistle (Silybum marianum) on the pharmacokinetics of irinotecan.

PURPOSE: Milk thistle (Silybum marianum) is one of the most commonly used herbal therapies, and its principal constituent silybin significantly inhibits cytochrome P450 isoform 3A4 (CYP3A4) and UDP glucuronosyltransferase isoform 1A1 (UGT1A1) in vitro. Here, we investigated whether milk thistle affects the pharmacokinetics of irinotecan, a substrate for CYP3A4 and UGT1A1, in humans. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Six cancer patients were treated with irinotecan (dose, 125 mg/m(2)) given as a 90-minute infusion once every week. Four days before the second dose, patients received 200 mg milk thistle, thrice a day, for 14 consecutive days. Pharmacokinetic studies of irinotecan and its metabolites 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (SN-38), 7-ethyl-10-[3,4,5-trihydroxy-pyran-2-carboxylic acid]-camptothecin (SN-38-glucuronide), and 7-ethyl-10-[4-N-(5-aminopentanoic acid)-1-piperidino]-carbonyloxycamptothecin were done during the first three irinotecan administrations. RESULTS: Short-term (4 days) or more prolonged intake of milk thistle (12 days) had no significant effect on irinotecan clearance (mean, 31.2 versus 25.4 versus 25.6 L/h; P = 0.16). The area under the curve ratio of SN-38 and irinotecan was slightly decreased by milk thistle (2.58% versus 2.23% versus 2.17%; P = 0.047), whereas the relative extent of glucuronidation of SN-38 was similar (10.8 versus 13.5 versus 13.1; P = 0.64). Likewise, the area under the curve ratio of 7-ethyl-10-[4-N-(5-aminopentanoic acid)-1-piperidino]-carbonyloxycamptothecin and irinotecan was unaffected by milk thistle (0.332 versus 0.285 versus 0.337; P = 0.53). The maximum plasma concentrations of silybin ranged between 0.0249 and 0.257 micromol/L. CONCLUSIONS: Silybin concentrations after intake of milk thistle are too low to significantly affect the function of CYP3A4 and UGT1A1 in vivo, indicating that milk thistle is unlikely to alter the disposition of anticancer drugs metabolized by these enzymes.     

Effects of methimazole on the elimination of irinotecan

Purpose

To study the possible pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between irinotecan and methimazole.

Methods

A patient treated for colorectal cancer with single agent irinotecan received methimazole co-medication for Graves’ disease. Irinotecan pharmacokinetics and side effects were followed during a total of four courses (two courses with and two courses without methimazole).

Results

Plasma concentrations of the active irinotecan metabolite SN-38 and its inactive metabolite SN-38-Glucuronide were both higher (a mean increase of 14 and 67%, respectively) with methimazole co-medication, compared to irinotecan monotherapy. As a result, the mean SN-38 glucuronidation rate increased with 47% during concurrent treatment. Other possible confounding factors did not change over time. Specific adverse events due to methimazole co-treatment were not seen.

Conclusions

Additional in vitro experiments suggest that these results can be explained by induction of UGT1A1 by methimazole, leading to higher SN-38G concentrations. The prescribed combination of these drugs may lead to highly toxic intestinal SN-38 levels. We therefore advise physicians to be very careful in combining methimazole with regular irinotecan doses, especially in patients who are prone to irinotecan toxicity.