Effect of sildenafil citrate on post-radical prostatectomy erectile dysfunction

PURPOSE: We assess the effect of sildenafil in a subgroup of patients after prostatectomy with erectile dysfunction and determine whether nerve preservation improves sildenafil response in this subgroup. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between April 1998 and January 1999, 53 patients who had undergone radical retropubic prostatectomy and were prescribed oral sildenafil were surveyed using a confidential mail questionnaire. Of the patients 21 underwent bilateral and 15 unilateral neurovascular bundle sparing procedures, while in 17 a nonnerve sparing procedure was performed. All patients received 25 to 100 mg. sildenafil in a flexible dose escalation manner. Response, satisfaction and side effects were assessed using a modified, self-administered International Index of Erectile Function questionnaire. Response was defined as erection sufficient for intercourse. Preoperative and postoperative/pretreatment erectile functions were assessed for baseline comparison in each patient, and partner overall satisfaction with sildenafil was measured. Statistical data analysis was performed using analysis of variance and Newman-Keuls multiple comparison tests. RESULTS: Of the 21 patients who underwent a bilateral nerve sparing procedure 15 had a positive response. Of the 15 patients who had undergone a unilateral nerve sparing procedure 12 had a positive response, and only 1 of the 17 patients who had undergone a nonnerve sparing procedure responded to sildenafil. The most commonly reported adverse events of all causes were headaches (21%), flushing (8.3%), visual disturbance (6.3%) and nasal congestion (6.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Sildenafil is an equally effective treatment for erectile dysfunction after bilateral and unilateral nerve sparing procedures, and patient response to sildenafil is confirmed by the partners. However, patients who undergo nonnerve sparing procedures do not respond satisfactorily to sildenafil.     

万艾可在伴心血管疾病ED患者中的临床应用

目的评价万艾可对伴有心血管疾病患者勃起功能障碍(ED)治疗的有效性和安全性。方法伴有心血管疾病的ED患者85例,其中高血压34例,冠心病19例,心律失常32例。性交前1h口服万艾可25mg,以后根据患者对治疗的满意程度和对药物的耐受性,逐渐增加,最大可达100mg。最大剂量不超过100mg/d。疗程为8周。结果万艾可治疗后,本组IIEF-5评分平均为(18．37±4．05)分,IIEF-5评分增加(8．61±2．35)分,配偶满意度总体评价,满意率达72．9%。结论慢性、稳定的心血管疾病ED患者对应用万艾可治疗有良好的有效性和耐受性。     

Efficacy, safety and patient acceptance of sildenafil citrate as treatment for erectile dysfunction

PURPOSE: We assessed the efficacy and safety of sildenafil citrate as treatment for erectile dysfunction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 433 completely evaluated men with chronic erectile dysfunction were treated with sildenafil citrate. Response was assessed prospectively by baseline and followup physician interviews, and by a patient self-administered 15-item questionnaire on the domains of patient treatment response and satisfaction, partner treatment satisfaction, comparative previous treatment satisfaction, adverse effects, and patient and partner quality of life. RESULTS: Of the 304 men (70.2%) who completed the questionnaire 278 received sildenafil, including 186 who previously had undergone treatment for erectile dysfunction, principally involving intracavernous injection therapy. A response was elicited by a median dose of 100 mg. in 188 patients (67.6%) who achieved erection suitable for sexual intercourse. Those with psychogenic erectile dysfunction responded significantly better than those with organic dysfunction (p <0.001). Erection suitable for intercourse was attained by 30.8% of patients with erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy and 80% with cavernous veno-occlusive dysfunction. Of previous intracavernous injection responders 29.9% were refractory to sildenafil, while 33. 3% of previous intracavernous injection nonresponders responded to sildenafil. The sildenafil response was considered inferior to the intracavernous injection response by 43.6% of the men who previously responded to intracavernous injection, of whom 51.5% continued to receive intracavernous injection as the only treatment (19.5%) or as an alternative to sildenafil (32%). Adverse effects in 53.6% of cases were assessed as mild in 56.4%, moderate in 38.3% and severe in 5.3%. Multiple adverse effects were reported by 62.4% of patients, while 17 (6.1%) discontinued sildenafil as a direct result of intolerable adverse effects. The most common adverse effects were facial flushing in 33.5% of cases, headaches in 23.4%, nasal congestion in 12.6%, dyspepsia in 10.1% and dizziness in 10.8%. Baseline patient and partner quality of life scores significantly improved after sildenafil treatment (p <0.001), while significantly improved quality of life was noticed by 51.5% and 43.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Sildenafil citrate is effective oral first line treatment for erectile dysfunction. Although more than 50% of men reported adverse effects, most were considered mild and rarely resulted in treatment cessation. There was a trend in those on intracavernous injection who responded to sildenafil to continue intracavernous injection as the only therapy or as an alternative to sildenafil. Also, we noted that some cases refractory to sildenafil responded to intracavernous injection. These findings imply that intracavernous injection remains an effective erectile dysfunction treatment option.     

Efficacy of sildenafil on erectile dysfunction of newly-weds

To explore the efficacy of sildenafil on erectile dysfunction (ED) of newly-weds, the author studied 60 outpatients within a month of marriage, who suffered from sexual intercourse (SI) failure caused by ED and showed no improvement after receiving sex education and psychological consultation. The patients were given oral sildenafil, 100 mg for the first and second times, 50 mg for the third and fourth times, no more than once every day, with a 1- to 3-day break between every two times. Four times of sildenafil administration formed one course of treatment. Sildenafil was taken 1 h before SI and was aided with adequate sexual stimulation. The rates of successful SI due to improved erection during and after a course of sildenafil treatment were 93.3% (56/60) and 85% (51/60), both P  > 0.05. In the groups with one and more than one SI failure the successful SI rates after a sildenafil treatment course were 93.1% (27/29) and 77.4% (24/31), both P  > 0.05. Oral sildenafil with psychological therapy in the treatment of ED of newly-weds proves to be effective in restoring the patients' sexual function and relieving their mental pressure or stress.     

The female partner''s satisfaction with sildenafil citrate treatment of erectile dysfunction

BACKGROUND: Data on female partners' satisfaction are scarce, although there have been many articles on patient satisfaction after sildenafil citrate treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the satisfaction of female partners of patients receiving sildenafil citrate for their erectile dysfunction (ED) and to assess the female partners' sexual function. METHODS: Ninety-eight patients with ED were treated. Their female partners were asked to answer a questionnaire we have prepared to evaluate the efficacy of treatment, sexual satisfaction and changes in quality of life. It also included a question about female sexual function. From the results, the relationship between their female partner's satisfaction and efficacy of treatment, as well as female sexual function, were assessed. RESULTS: Thirty (31%) questionnaires were returned to us for analysis. Effectiveness of the treatment was acknowledged by 90% of the partners. An improvement in their partner's quality of life was noticed by 60% of the women. The majority (66.7%) of the female partners were satisfied with sildenafil citrate treatment and 20% were disappointed. Moreover, 20% of the female partners were concerned about adverse events. Regarding female sexual function, some form of sexual dysfunction affected 46.7% of the women. Furthermore, a significant number (P = 0.0230) of the female partners disappointed with the treatment had some kind of sexual dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicated that female partners reported relatively high levels of treatment satisfaction. Female partners' sexual function and anxiety regarding adverse events should be evaluated when their satisfaction with sildenafil citrate treatment is poor despite an improvement of erectile function.     

The effect of erectile dysfunction on quality of life: psychometric testing of a new quality of life measure for patients with erectile dysfunction.

PURPOSE: We assessed the psychometric properties of the newly developed Erectile Dysfunction Effect on Quality of Life (ED-EQoL) instrument for quantifying the effect of erectile dysfunction on quality of life. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The questionnaire was assessed in a cohort of 283 men recruited from 11 centers in the United Kingdom. Internal consistency was examined by Cronbach's alpha, test-retest reliability was determined by administering the instrument on 2 occasions 2 weeks apart without treatment in the interim, construct validity was assessed by comparison with other quality of life measures and responsiveness was evaluated by comparing the change in the ED-EQoL after treatment with change in other measures. RESULTS: The ED-EQoL was simple to complete and captured wide variation in quality of life. It demonstrated good internal consistency and reliability, and generally correlated in an expected manner with other quality of life measures. Correlation with initial erectile function was relatively low but the change in function after treatment was reflected by the change in quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: When assessing erectile dysfunction in clinical practice or research, it is important to consider the effect on quality of life in addition to function. To our knowledge the ED-EQoL is the first erectile dysfunction specific quality of life instrument developed and extensively validated according to accepted principles of questionnaire design. Combined with a measure of erectile function its use is recommended in routine clinical practice and in research to provide a holistic approach to the assessment of erectile dysfunction and its treatment.     

Sildenafil citrate improves erectile function and urinary symptoms in men with erectile dysfunction and lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomized, double-blind trial

PURPOSE: We evaluated sildenafil for erectile dysfunction and lower urinary tract symptoms in men with the 2 conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a 12-week, double-blind, placebo controlled study of sildenafil in men 45 years or older who scored 25 or less on the erectile function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function and 12 or greater on the International Prostate Symptom Score. Men with confirmed or suspected prostate malignancy, or prostate specific antigen 10 ng/ml or more were excluded. End points were changes in International Index of Erectile Function domain scores, International Prostate Symptom Score (irritative, obstructive and quality of life), the Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Impact Index, the Self-Esteem And Relationship questionnaire and Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction Index Score. RESULTS: The 189 men receiving sildenafil had significant improvements in erectile function domain score vs the 180 on placebo (9.17 vs 1.86, p<0.0001) and on all other International Index of Erectile Function domains. In men on sildenafil vs placebo significant improvements were observed in International Prostate Symptom Score (-6.32 vs -1.93, p<0.0001), Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Impact Index (-2.0 vs -0.9, p<0.0001), mean International Prostate Symptom Score quality of life score (-0.97 vs -0.29, p<0.0001) and total Self-Esteem And Relationship questionnaire scores (24.6 vs 4.3, p<0.0001). There was no difference in urinary flow between the groups (p=0.08). Significantly more sildenafil vs placebo treated patients were satisfied with treatment (71.2 vs 41.7, p<0.0001). Sildenafil was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Improved erectile dysfunction and lower urinary tract symptoms with sildenafil in men with the 2 conditions were associated with improved quality of life and treatment satisfaction. Daily dosing with sildenafil may improve lower urinary tract symptoms. However, the lack of effect on urinary flow rates may mean that a new basic pathophysiology paradigm is needed to explain the etiology of lower urinary tract symptoms.     

Role of sildenafil citrate in treatment of erectile dysfunction after radical retropubic prostatectomy

BACKGROUND: Sildenafil citrate was introduced as a treatment for erectile dysfunction in April 1998 in the United States and has been available since March 1999 in Japan. In this article, we assess the efficacy of sildenafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction in Japanese men after radical retropubic prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer. METHODS: Of 106 men who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy between January 1994 and March 2000, 43 were prescribed sildenafil at their request after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Medication was initiated at 25 mg, and if this was ineffective, the dose was increased to 50 mg. Of the patients, 18 underwent bilateral and 21 unilateral nerve sparing (NS) procedures, while in 4 patients, a non-NS procedure was performed. These patients were interviewed using a questionnaire about their response to sildenafil and using the 5-item International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) questionnaire. RESULTS: Thirty-three of the 43 patients were eligible for evaluation of the efficacy of sildenafil and 27 completed the IIEF-5 questionnaires. Sildenafil at 50 mg had a better effect on sexual function than 25 mg in most Japanese patients. Of the 16 patients who underwent bilateral NS procedures, 10 (62.5%) had improved ability for intercourse and 3 (18.8%) had improved erections. Of the 13 patients who underwent unilateral NS procedures, 7 (53.8%) had improved ability for intercourse and 4 (30.8%) had improved erections. None of the 4 patients who underwent non-NS procedures had a positive response. Of 24 patients with positive response to sildenafil, 3 (12.5%) did not have to take sildenafil after receiving it because they did not require it for intercourse. Mean IIEF-5 score increased from 4.3 to 11.4 (P < 0.0001). Patient age, time since surgery, PSA and pathological stage did not have statistically significant effects on outcome. The most commonly cited adverse effect was headache (21%). CONCLUSION: Sildenafil is equally effective for erectile dysfunction in Japanese patients who have undergone bilateral and unilateral NS procedures, and aids recovery of natural erectile function after radical retropubic prostatectomy. However, non-NS procedure patients had no response to sildenafil. This study suggested that sildenafil is well tolerated and should be initially used for treatment of Japanese men with erectile dysfunction after radical retropubic prostatectomy.     

Early experience with sildenafil for the treatment of erectile dysfunction in renal transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Erectile dysfunction (ED) is common in men with renal failure, but is not always alleviated following kidney transplant. The objective of the present study was to assess the feasibility in renal transplant patients of sildenafil citrate treatment, an agent with proven efficacy in the management of ED. METHODS: This was a phase IV, open, multicentre, 3 month, dose-escalation study. All patients meeting the inclusion criteria were prescribed a dose of 50 mg sildenafil at the first visit. Thereafter the dose could be increased to 100 mg or reduced to 25 mg based on efficacy or tolerability. The primary efficacy parameter assessed the ability of patients to achieve erections sufficient for intercourse and to maintain erections after penetration. Secondary endpoints assessed patient satisfaction with sildenafil and the effect of sildenafil on their quality of life. Patients were carefully monitored throughout the study for adverse events, interactions with immunosuppressive therapy and effect on graft function. RESULTS: The study included 50 patients in the intent-to-treat population. Sildenafil significantly improved patient's erection ability and the frequency of their erection maintenance. Analysis of the secondary efficacy parameters revealed that 66% of patients believed treatment had improved their erections. Patients reported improvements in their sexual life and partner relationships and a high level of satisfaction with treatment. There were no interactions between sildenafil and the immunosuppressive drugs and there was no significant adverse effect of sildenafil on graft function. CONCLUSIONS: Sildenafil is an effective and well-tolerated agent for the treatment of ED in renal transplant recipients.     

Psychological impact of erectile dysfunction: validation of a new health related quality of life measure for patients with erectile dysfunction

PURPOSE: Male erectile dysfunction has a substantial impact on health related quality of life. We examined the psychometric properties of 2 new scales created to measure the psychological impact of erectile dysfunction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients enrolled in a long-term study of men with erectile dysfunction completed clinical and health related quality of life information at baseline and at 3 followup points. The questionnaire incorporated a number of standard scales of psychosocial characteristics as well as questions developed from comments made during focus groups of men with erectile dysfunction and of their female partners. Principal components analysis was used to identify underlying constructs in response to the new questions. RESULTS: A total of 168 men completed the baseline quality of life questionnaire. The principal components analysis of the psychological impact of erectile dysfunction questions resulted in 2 new scales. Reliability was good with an internal consistency reliability of 0.91 for scale 1 and 0.72 for scale 2. Test-retest reliability was 0.76 and 0.66, respectively. Men reporting a greater psychological impact of erectile dysfunction also reported greater impairment in functional status, lower sexual self-efficacy, greater depression and anxiety at the last intercourse. Each new scale significantly differentiated men with mild/moderate versus severe erectile dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: We developed 2 new scales to measure the psychological impact of erectile dysfunction and they showed good reliability and validity. These new scales, named the Psychological Impact of Erectile Dysfunction instrument, comprehensively capture the psychological effect of erectile dysfunction on health related quality of life, which is not adequately assessed by existing patient centered measures of erectile function.     

Algorithm for diagnosis and treatment of erectile dysfunction in the era of sildenafil citrate

Since Viagra (sildenafil citrate) was released as a pharmaceutical agent for the treatment of erectile dysfunction, it has had a big impact on the work undertaken in our practice. I herewith present an algorithm for the diagnosis and treatment of erectile dysfunction in the era of sildenafil citrate.     

Efficacy of apomorphine and sildenafil in men with nonarteriogenic erectile dysfunction. A comparative crossover study

To compare the efficacy of apomorphine and sildenafil in men with nonarteriogenic erectile dysfunction (ED), 40 men were studied. Post-injection penile peak systolic velocity was greater than 25 cm s(-1). Twenty men started on apomorphine 2 mg and 20 on sildenafil 50 mg, the doses titrated up to 3 and 100 mg, respectively, if necessary. After a 1-week washout period each group switched to the other treatment mode. Efficacy was the percentage of attempts resulting in erections firm enough for intercourse, based on an event log data. The majority (85%) of the men had concomitant diseases, risk factors for ED and 95% were heavy smokers. The overall success rate of apomorphine was 62.7%, compared with 73.1% of sildenafil (Yates-corrected chi-square, P < 0.0004). The response to apomorphine 2 mg and sildenafil 50 mg was age related. Sildenafil was statistically more effective than apomorphine in impotent men with normal penile Doppler. Given the contraindication of sildenafil in men taking nitrates and the quick time of action of apomorphine, the two drugs are satisfactory first line therapeutic tools in such individuals and the choice should be based on patient's needs and preferences.     

Bidirectional relationship between depression and erectile dysfunction

PURPOSE: We specified the interrelationship between depressive mood and erectile dysfunction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The target population consisted of men who were 50, 60 or 70 years old and residing in the study area in Finland in 1994. Questionnaires were mailed to 3,143 men in 1994 and to 2,837 men 5 years later. The followup sample consisted of 1,683 men who responded to the baseline and followup questionnaires. RESULTS: Erectile dysfunction was strongly associated with untreated and treated depressive symptoms. The prevalence OR adjusted for potential confounders was 2.6 (95% CI 1.8-3.8) for untreated and 3.3 (95% CI 1.6-7.1) for treated depressive symptoms at the beginning of followup. The incidence of erectile dysfunction was 59/1,000 person-years (95% CI 39-90) in men with depressive mood and 37/1,000 person-years (95% CI 32-43) in those free of the disorder. Compared with men free of depressive symptoms who did not use medication for psychological disorders at study entry the adjusted incidence density ratio of erectile dysfunction was 4.5 (95% CI 2.2-9.2) in men with treated depressive symptoms and 1.2 (0.7-2.1) in those with untreated depressive symptoms. The incidence of depressive mood was 20/1,000 person-years in men with erectile dysfunction and 11/1,000 person-years in those free of erectile dysfunction. The adjusted incidence density ratio of depressive mood was 1.9 (95% CI 1.1-3.3) in men with erectile dysfunction compared with those free of it at entry. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate or severe depressive mood or antidepressant medication use may cause erectile dysfunction and erectile dysfunction independently may cause or exacerbate depressive mood.     

Longitudinal differences in disease specific quality of life in men with erectile dysfunction: results from the Exploratory Comprehensive Evaluation of Erectile Dysfunction study

PURPOSE: We assessed the impact of erectile dysfunction therapy on 1-year health related quality of life using a validated erectile dysfunction specific instrument. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using an observational erectile dysfunction registry clinical, sociodemographic and health related quality of life information was collected at baseline, and 3, 6 and 12 months later. Only men who reported undergoing erectile dysfunction treatment were included in this analysis sub-sample. Patients were classified as treatment responders based on improvements in International Index of Erectile Function scores. Changes in health related quality of life scores from baseline were compared between responders and nonresponders. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 89 patients, of whom 40 (45%) responded to therapy by International Index of Erectile Function criteria. Responders and nonresponders had comparable baseline disease severity and health related quality of life. At 1 year responders reported significantly better health related quality of life and greater improvement from baseline in sexual experience (mean change -1.64 versus 3.19) and emotional life (mean -3.01 for responders versus 1.75) domains of the Psychological Impact of Erectile Dysfunction scales (p <0.01). This 4.5 to 5 point difference in mean change score (1/2 SD) was considered moderately clinically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Men who respond to erectile dysfunction treatment report significantly better health related quality of life 1 year after initial presentation for erectile dysfunction than nonresponders. This finding should motivate providers to be more proactive in diagnosing and treating men with erectile dysfunction since successful therapy appears to improve health related quality of life. These data suggest that men in whom primary therapy for erectile dysfunction fails should be offered secondary treatment because many men in this study in whom previous therapies failed reported improved health related quality of life when they began effective secondary treatment.     

膀胱全切术后阴茎勃起障碍调查及西地那非治疗效果分析

目的探讨膀胱全切术后男性患者勃起功能障碍及西地那非治疗效果。方法回顾性分析1997年6月～2005年2月53例膀胱全切患者临床资料。年龄35～62岁,平均51岁。32例行原位回肠膀胱术,21例行Bricker回肠膀胱术。保留血管神经束者28例,未保留血管神经束者25例。采用勃起功能国际问卷-5(IIEF-5)评估术前、术后及西地那非治疗前后勃起功能状况。结果随访16～47月,53例膀胱全切患者ED发生率为73.6%,其IIEF-5评分由术前(21.6±3.8)下降至(4.3±5.1)(P<0.05)。保留血管神经束膀胱全切ED发生率为57%,而未保留血管神经束者ED发生率为92%。39例ED患者中,13例应用西地那非治疗,其中9例保留血管神经束者治疗前后IIEF-5评分分别为(5.3±1.2)和(20.6±2.3)(P<0.05);而未保留血管神经束者治疗前后IIEF-5评分分别为(2.0±1.4)和(2.6±1.7)(P>0.05)。结论勃起功能障碍是膀胱全切术后常见并发症。保留血管神经束可保留部分患者的勃起功能,同时也是应用西地那非治疗成功的关键。     

Analysis of single items on the Self-Esteem and Relationship questionnaire in men treated with sildenafil citrate for erectile dysfunction: results of two double-blind, placebo-controlled trials

Associate Editor Michael G. Wyllie Editorial Board Ian Eardley, UK Jean Fourcroy, USA Sidney Glina, Brazil Julia Heiman, USA Chris McMahon, Australia Bob Millar, UK Alvaro Morales, Canada Michael Perelman, USA Marcel Waldinger, Netherlands

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of sildenafil citrate on each item of the 14‐item Self‐Esteem And Relationship (SEAR) questionnaire, which is used to measure self‐esteem, confidence, satisfaction with sexual relationship, and overall relationship satisfaction in men with erectile dysfunction (ED).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data were combined from two 12‐week, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, flexible‐dose sildenafil trials having identical protocols, one conducted in the USA and the other in Mexico, Brazil, Australia and Japan. All men had ED and were aged ≥18 years. Response categories of each SEAR item used a 4‐week reference period and were based on a five‐point scale (1, almost never/never; 2, a few times; 3, sometimes; 4, most times; 5, almost always/always). The difference (sildenafil vs placebo) in the change from baseline to week 12 was evaluated with a Wilcoxon rank sum test using ridit analysis, and an analysis of covariance model that included treatment group, centre, study and baseline item score.

RESULTS

Compared with the 274 patients receiving placebo, the 279 receiving sildenafil reported significantly greater mean and median improvements (P < 0.001) in each of the 14 SEAR items. The probability of increased psychosocial benefit from baseline to week 12 was higher with sildenafil for each SEAR item, and ranged from 0.60 (‘My partner was unhappy with the quality of our sexual relations’[item reverse‐scored]) to 0.72 (‘I was satisfied with my sexual performance’). Across all items, the mean (sd ) probability was 0.67 (0.04) that a randomly selected patient in the sildenafil group would have a more favourable change relative to a randomly selected patient in the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

Sildenafil produced substantial and meaningful improvements at the item‐specific level. This analysis complements previously published work on self‐esteem, confidence and relationship satisfaction.     

Mechanical reliability of the AMS 700CXM inflatable penile prosthesis for the treatment of male erectile dysfunction

PURPOSE: The AMS 700CXM inflatable penile prosthesis with medium controlled expansion cylinders was introduced in 1990 to provide a device with controlled expansion in girth and fitness for Asian men. We reviewed our experience with the AMS 700CXM prosthesis with particular regard to postoperative complications and reliability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 1991 to April 1999, 273 men with erectile dysfunction underwent primary penile prosthesis implantation with the AMS 700CXM. Functional status of the prosthesis was assessed retrospectively by reviewing the medical records and a telephone interview. RESULTS: Patient age was 24 to 78 years and mean followup was 49 months. Of the 28 complications (10.3%) 8 (3%) were nonmechanical and 20 (7.3%) were mechanical. Nonmechanical complications included infection in 2 cases, erosion in 3, surgical complications in 2 and tube kinking in 1. Mechanical complications involved a cylinder tear in 11 cases (4%), pump failure in 4 (1.5%) and a reservoir tear in 2 (0.7%). Mechanical reliability of the device was 98.2% after 2, 95.7% after 3 and 90.4% after 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: The AMS 700CXM is suitable for Asian men and its mechanical reliability is excellent. However, more device modifications are needed to guarantee good reliability during long-term followup.     

Study of the efficacy of Korean Red Ginseng in the treatment of erectile dysfunction

Aim： To examine the treatment efficacy of Korean Red Ginseng （KRG） in impotent men with erectile dysfunction （ED）. Methods： A total of 60 patients presenting mild or mild to moderate ED were enrolled in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study in which the efficacies of KRG and a placebo were compared. The patients received either 1 000 mg （3 times daily） of KRG or a placebo. Results： The five-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function （IIEF-5） score after the treatment was significantly higher in the KRG group compared with that before the treatment （from 16.4±2.9 to 21.0±6.3, P 〈 0.0001）. In contrast, there was no difference before and after the treatment in the placebo group （from 17.0±3.1 to 17.7±5.6, P 〉 0.05）. In the KRG group, 20 patients （66.6%）, reported improved erection, significant in the global efficacy question （P 〈 0.01）; in the placebo group there was no significance. Scores on questions 2 （rigidity）, 3 （penetration）, 4 and 5 （maintenance）, were significantly higher for KRG than those for the placebo when those questions were answered after 12 weeks of each treatment （P 〈 0.01）. When the score in the KRG group was compared to the placebo group after the treatment, there was a significant improvement in total score （IIEF-5 score） in questions 3 and 5 for the KRG-treated group （P 〈 0.001 and P 〈 0.0001, respectively）. The levels of serum testosterone, prolactine and cholesterol after the treatment were not statistically significant different between the KRG and the placebo group （P 〉 0.05）. Conclusion： Our data show that KRG can be an effective alternative to the invasive approaches for treating male ED.