Atrial Natriuretic Factor Release During Exercise in Patients Successively Paced in DDD and Rate Matched Ventricular Pacing

Dual chamber pacemakers were implanted in nine patients with permanent second or third degree AV block feight had complete retrograde block). Two identical exercise tests were performed after at least 1 month after implantation. During the first test (T₁) the pacemaker was programmed to the DDD mode and heart rates were recorded every 15 to 30 seconds during exercise and 30 minutes after exercise. Following 30 minutes of rest, the implanted pacemaker was programmed to the VVT mode and driven by an external pacemaker via a skin electrode. The second exercise test (T₂) was then performed and the rate of the external pacemaker was progressively changed to reproduce exactly the rate observed during T₁ at the same exercise stress. Atrial natriuretic factor (ANF) levels were determined at rest, at regular intervals during exercise, and 30 minutes after exercise. ANF levels and release were statistically higher during rate matched ventricular, than DDD pacing. It is concluded that preservation of AV synchrony reduces ANF release induced by heart rate acceleration during exercise.     

Quality-of-Life in Patients Treated with Atrioventricular Synchronous Pacing Compared to Rate Modulated Ventricular Pacing: A Long-Term, Double-Blind, Crossover Study

To investigate whether the preservation of afrioventricular (AV) synchronization matters for quality-of-life during pacemaker treatment we assessed 17 consecutive patients with high degree AV block and preserved sinus node function in a double-blind, long-term crossover study. A questionnaire with regard to cardiovascular symptoms, sleep disturbances, cognitive functioning, physical ability, social interaction, emotional functioning, and self-perceived health was completed after 2 months of atrial synchronous (DDD) and rate modulated ventricular pacing (VVI,R), respectively. A significant improvement in shortness of breath, dizziness and palpitations as well as an improvement of cognitive functioning was observed during DDD pacing. Nine patients preferred the DDD mode and three the VVI,R mode. The remaining five patients did not express any preference. The preference for the DDD mode was explained by a significant reduction of cardiovascular symptoms and an improved self-perceived health, physical ability, and psychological well-being during DDD pacing. All differences in quality-of-life parameters between the two modes of pacing favored the DDD mode and no adverse effects of this mode were found. Thus, the maintenance of AV synchrony adds further symptomatic relief compared to rate increase alone. The results indicate that DDD pacing is the preferred mode of pacing in patients with high degree AV block and preserved sinus node function.     

Adequacy of Pacing Rate During Exercise in Rate Responsive Ventricular Pacing

Our objective was to determint; the adequate pacing rate during exercise in ventricular pacing by measuring exercise capacity, cardiac output, and sinus node activity. Eighteen patients with complete AV block and an implanted pacemaker underwent cardiopulmonary exercise tests under three randomized pacing rates: fixed rate pacing (VVJ) at 60 beats/min and ventricular rate-responsive pacing (VVIR) programmed to attain a heart rate of about 110 beats/min ar 130 beats/min (VVIR 110 and VVIR 130, respectively) at the end of exercise. Compared with VVI and VVIR 130, VVIR 110 was associated with an increased peak oxygen uptake(VVIR 110:20.3 ± 4.5 vs VVI: 16.9 ± 3.1; P < 0.01; and VVIR 130: 19.0 ± 4.1 mL/min per kg, respectively; P < 0.05) and a higher oxygen uptake at anaerobic threshold (15.3 ± 2.7, 12.7 ± 1.9; P < 0.01, and 14.6 ± 2.6 mL/min per kg; P < 0.05). The atrial rate during exercise expressed as a percentage of the expected maximal heart rate was lower in VVIR 110 than in VVI or VVIR 130 (VVIR 110: 75.9%± 14.6% vs VVI: 90.6%± 12.8%; P < 0.01; VVIR 110 vs VVIR 130: 89.1%± 23.1%; P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in cardiac output at peak exercise between VVIR 110 and VVIR 130. We conclude that a pacing rate for submaximal exercise of 110 beats/min may be preferable to that of 130 beats/min in respect to exercise capacity and sympathetic nerve activity.     

Comparison of Low Rate Dual Chamber Pacing to Activity Responsive Rate Variable Ventricular Pacing

A study was undertaken to evaluate exercise performance in 18 dual chamber pacemaker patients believed to be chronotropically incompetent. All patients were paced in a DDD AV synchronous mode at 80 beats per minute (beats/min) as well as an externally triggered, activity responsive VVIR mode. Patients underwent two single blind, randomized symptom-limited treadmill tests (Sheffield protocol). Four of the 18 patients achieved intrinsic rates greater than 100 beats/min and were deleted from the primary study. It was noted that all four of these patients performed best with intrinsic rate response and AV synchrony. Thirteen of the remaining 14 patients demonstrated improved exercise tolerance in the VVIR mode. Average exercise time in the VVIR mode (7:25 +/- 3:12 min) was significantly greater (P less than 0.05) than the DDD mode (6:01 +/- 2:27 min). Work performed was significantly greater (P less than 0.05) in the VVIR mode (4.77 +/- 1.97 METS) than in the DDD mode (3.78 +/- 0.77 METS). Maximum heart rates were 83.86 +/- 5.11 beats/min in DDD mode versus 116.00 +/- 10.56 beats/min in VVIR mode. The results demonstrated that improved exercise tolerance can be achieved with single chamber rate variable pacing compared to DDD pacing in patients with chronotropic incompetence. However, potential symptoms associated with loss of AV synchrony should be ruled out.     

Superior Cardiac Hemodynamics of Atrioventricular Synchrony Over Rate Responsive Pacing at Submaximal Exercise: Observations in Activity Sensing DDDR Pacemakers

LAU, C.-P., ET AL.: Superior Cardiac Hemodynamics of Atrioventricular Synchrony Over Rate Responsive Pacing at Submaximal Exercise: Observations in Activity Sensing DDDR Pacemakers. The relative hemodynamic profile between dual chamber pacing (DDD) and activity sensing rate responsive pacing (VVIR) was compared in ten patients with dual chamber rate responsive pacemakers (Synergist 11). With a double blind, randomized exercise protocol, DDDR pacemakers were programmed into VVI, VVIR, and DDD (AV interval 150 msec) modes and in seven patients the test in the DDD mode was repeated with the AV interval programmed at 75 msec. A treadmill exercise test of 6-minutes duration (2 stages, Stage 1 at 2 mph, 0% gradient and Stage II at 2 mph, 15% gradient) was performed at each of the programmed settings, with a rest period of 30 minutes in between tests. Cardiac output was assessed using continuous-wave Doppler sampling ascending aortic flow and expressed as a percentage of the value achieved during VVI pacing. During exercise, pacing rate between DDD and VVIR pacing was similar but was higher with DDD at the first minute of recovery (91 ± 4vs 81 ± 3 beat/min, respectively). Cardiac output was significantly higher at rest, during low level exercise, and recovery with DDD pacing compared with VVIR pacing (resting: 21 ± 14 vs -2 ± 7%; Stage I: 36 ± 6 vs 16 ± 7%; Stage II: 25 ± 15 vs 10 ± 8%; recovery: 26 ± 12 vs 4 ± 9%; p < 0.05 in all cases). Systolic blood pressure was significantly higher during low level of exercise in the DDD mode. Shortening of the AV interval to 75 msec did not significantly affect cardiac output during exercise, but cardiac output after exercise was reduced (2 ± 6 vs 23 ± 6% at an AV interval of 150 msec, p < 0.02). By enhancing the stroke volume, DDD pacing improves cardiac hemodynamics at rest, during low level exercise, and early postexercise recovery.     

Reliability of the Evoked Response in Determining the Paced Ventricular Rate and Performance of the QT or Rate Responsive (TX) Pacemaker

The TX pacemaker uses a conventional transvenous electrode to sense T-waves of paced ventricular complexes and it adapts the pacing rate to varying physiological demands by responding to changes in the QT or, more correctly, the stimulus artifact-to-T-wave (stimulus-T) interval. This pacing system was assessed in 13 patients. The relation between heart rate and stimulus-T interval and the effect of programming on the performance of this pacemaker were studied on several occasions in each patient. Treadmill exercise performance during TX pacing mode was compared with atrial synchronized ventricular (VAT) and asynchronous ventricular demand (VOO and VVI--70 beats per minute) pacing modes. T-wave sensing problems arose in three patients. In one, this was overcome by reducing the pulse amplitude from 5.0 to 2.5 V. In another patient, spontaneous recovery of T-wave sensing occurred 5 months after pacemaker implantation. T-wave sensing deteriorated with the passage of time in most patients. Satisfactory rate response as assessed by treadmill exercise testing and Holter monitoring was achieved in 12 patients through adjustments of two programmable parameters: the slope that defines the alteration in heart rate in response to a millisecond change in stimulus-T interval and the "sensing window" that is the interval during which T-waves can be sensed and a rate response is possible. Exercise performance was significantly better during rate responsive pacing (TX) mode as compared with VVI pacing but was comparable to that during VAT pacing. The resting heart rate/stimulus-T interval can be described by the following linear regression equation: stimulus-T interval = 466 - 1.68 X paced-rate, r2 = -0.62. This relation, however, was subject to wide inter- and intra-patient variation. Consequently, given identical programmed parameters and exercise protocol, the chronotropic response differed significantly from patient to patient and in the same patient from one occasion to another. Our results show that a physiologically beneficial chronotropic response can be achieved in most patients. However, reprogramming, based on results of exercise tests and Holter monitoring, may be necessary to adjust for changes in T-wave sensing and the heart rate/stimulus-T interval relation and, thus to ensure that the pacemaker continues to function optimally.     

Cardiopulmonary Responses to Exercise in Children with Activity Sensing Rate Responsive Ventricular Pacemakers

The physiological benefits of activity sensing rate responsive ventricular pacing)VVIR) over fixed rate pacing)VVI) were investigated in 14 children during incremenlal cycle exercise. Based on their heart rhythm response during exercise, children were divided into two groups. Group I patients)13 ± 4 years) remained in a paced-only rhythm when exercised. Group II patients)16 ± 7 years) were paced at rest but converted to sinus rhythm with exercise. In Group I patients, the significant physioJogicol benefits of VVIR over VVI pacing were evidenced hy a 51% increase in peak heart rate)HRmax) and a 16% increase in exercise duration and maximum oxygen uptake)VO₂max). Additionally, a 27% reduction in peak oxygen pulse)O₂Pmax) was found, reflecting a similar decrease in stroke volume. The cardiorespiraiory responses of Group I and 11 patients were compared in terms of percent of predicted normal values. Although Group I patients in the VVIR mode attained a better exercise performance than in the VVI mode and a normal O₂Pmax)108% pred). their HRmax)62% pred) and VO₂max)70% pred) fell far below normal values. In comparison. Group II patients, who went into sinus rhythm, achieved normal values for HRmax)84% pred), VO₂max)90% pred), and O₂Pmax)97% pred). The higher pacing rates attained by Group I patients in the VVIR mode may have allowed them to reach not only a higher cardiac output but also a more normal stroke volume at peak exercise than in the VVI mode. However, the overall exercise performance of children paced in the VVI and VVIR modes were significantly diminished compared to the performance of children who went into sinus rhythm with exercise.)     

Single Lead Atrial Synchronous Ventricular Pacing: A Dream Come True

Single lead, atrial synchronous pacing systems were developed in the late 1970s. Clinical experience has demonstrated the need to position the "floating" atrial electrode in the mid-to-high right atrium and the need for a specially designed pulse generator (with very high atrial sensitivity) to provide a high quality and amplitude atrial electrogram for consistent sensing. A 12-year experience with different electrode configurations, from the first unipolar designed in 1980 to the most recent atrial bipolar electrodes, has confirmed the validity of the original concept and the long-term reliability of the single lead atrial synchronous pacing system, which can reliably produce long-term atrial sensing and ventricular stimulation in the presence of normal sinoatrial function.     

Rate Responsive Pacing Using the Evoked QT Principle. A Physiological Alternative to Atrial Synchronous Pacemakers

We have evaluated clinically a rate-responsive pacemaker which uses the evoked QT principle as indicator of physiological demand. This pacemaker is microprocessor-based and fully programmable noninvasively through radiofrequency coupling to an external microcomputer. To date this system has been implanted in 15 patients. With this QTsensing pacemaker the ra te response to exercise was smooth and progressive, and gradually returned to the basic paced rate after termination of activity. Physiologic rate responsive pacing resulted in significant improvement in exercise tolerance and a 40% increase in cardiac output when compared to fixedrate pacing in 8 patients. This initial experience confirms the possibility of obtaining a physiological response to exercise using a pacing system dependent only on a unipolar electrode which is independent of the problems of atrial activity and sensing. Rate responsive pacing might prove to be a useful alternative to atrial synchronous systems, and particularly advantageous in those patients whose sinoatrial function is abnormal or who suffer from atrial arrhythmias.     

A New Mechanical Sensor for Detecting Body Activity and Posture, Suitable for Rate Responsive Pacing

In the past, thought about rate responsive pacing mainly focused on rate increase with exercise but did not consider that a rate increase with postural changes also is mandatory in order to prevent orthostatic reactions. A nightly decrease in pacemaker rate when the body is at rest and in a supine position is a further advantage for the patient's sleep and recovery. Therefore, we developed a sensor that could detect not only rest and body activity but also discriminate between a supine and an upright position. This sensor is a muiticontact tilt switch containing a small mercury ball, as shown in the left panel of the figure below. The principle of discrimination between rest and low and high body activity is realized by the movement of the mercury ball resulting from body motion, which causes openings and closures within the sensor as the ball touches the numerous sensor contacts. In the upright position, a distinct number of contacts at the bottom of the tilt switch are closed. In the supine position, there is no closure of the bottom contacts and a postural discrimination can he achieved. We studied 12 volunteers and 10 pacemaker patients with this new device both at rest and during physical exercise. The right panel of the figure illustrates that the contacts per second correlate to the increase of physical exercise, such as walking on the treadmill. Further studies with an external pacemaker containing a small sensor suitable to fit into the pacemaker are in preparation.     

Activity-Sensing Rate Responsive Versus Conventional Fixed-Rate Pacing: A Comparision of Rate Behavior and Patient Well-Being During Routine Daily Exercise

Rate responsive single chamber pacing (WIR) may be the pacemaker of choice in pafients who are not suitable candidates for a dual chamber system. Several studies, most of them performed in an exercise laboratory, have shown a significantly higher exercise capacity demonstrating an improvement in cardiac output and anaerobic threshold compared to conventional fixed rate pacing (VVT). Expressing our idea that stress testing in an “artificial environment” on a bicycle or motor driven treadmill has its limitations and may be difficult to extend into patient's daily life, we designed an outdoor study imitating patient's daily activity. Twenty-one patients with an activity-sensing rate responsive pacemaker performed in a double blind fashion in VVI and VVIR mode the following test circuit: walking 170 meters on flat ground, 210 meters incline, climbing a flight of stairs, and the same circuit in reverse order, and therefore “downhill”. Heart rate behavior was recorded by Holter monitoring and patients subjective feelings of well-being, i.e. fatigue and dyspnea were also evaluated, VVIR pacing responded promptly to exercise, i.e., walking on a flat ground, but no further significant increase in pacing rate was observed in relationship to the strength of physical activity while walking inclined or climbing stairs. While patients became exhausted, a nonphysiological decrease in heart rate sometimes occurred. Despite these limitations 6 of 12 patients who had a paced-only rhythm while exercising in both VVI and VVIR mode reported feeling significantly belter in the VVIR mode, expressing less dyspnea and fatigue. In contrast, two of nine patients having only intermittently paced rhythm preferred the VVIR mode. Patients with lower ejection fraction (EF) were more likely to show subjectively a benefit while exercising in VVIR mode, compared to those with less reduced or normal EF. Despite the technical limitations of using a piezo crystal for rate adaptation, WIR pacing is an important option in paced-only patients, but it seems less beneficial in patients with only intermittent paced rhythm.     

The Effects of Rate Responsive Pacing on Exercise Performance in the Postoperative Univentricular Heart

Following the Fontan operation for definitive palliation of the univentricular heart, sinus node dysfunction, and/or atrioventricular block requiring pacemaker therapy is common. In previous studies ventricular rate responsive pacing (VVI, R) resulted in improved exercise performance over VVI pacing in anatomically normal hearts with either sinus node disease or atrioventricular block. In this study, the usefulness of both VVI, R and DDD, R pacing are evaluated in the postoperative univentricular heart following the Fontan operation. Eight postoperative Fontan patients with sinus node disease or atrioventricular block underwent exercise testing using a treadmill protocol. Six patients had single chamber ventricular pacemakers and two patients had dual chambered rate responsive pacemakers. Median age at exercise testing was 14 years. Patients were tested in the VVI, VVI, R, and DDD, R modes acting as their own controls. Heart rate, work rate, oxygen consumption, and respiratory exchange ratio were monitored continuously. Heart rate was significantly increased in the rate responsive modes compared to the VVI mode. In spite of the significant increase in heart rate, there was no change in maximal work rate or oxygen consumption. There was also no significant change in oxygen consumption at ventilatory anaerobic threshold. From these data we would conclude that VVI, R pacing in postoperative univentricular hearts does not result in improved exercise performance and that further study with DDD, R pacing is needed to determine its usefulness in this group of patients.     

Rate-Responsive Pacing by Means of Activity Sensing Versus Single Rate Ventricular Pacing: A Double-Blind Cross-Over Study

The clinical appiicabiJity of rate-responsive pacing (RRP) by means of activity sensing has been tested in 15 patients. The patients (ages 24–85) had sinus node dysfunction (2), atrial fibrillation (7), or sinus rhythm (6) combined with complete atrioventricular block. Exercise capacity was investigated on a bicycle ergometer and on a treadmill in a double-blind cross-over study design following one week each of fixed rate ventricu/ar pacing (70 bpm) and rate-responsive pacing (60/125–150 bpm). The patients answered a questionnaire concerning subjective symptoms. A Holter ECG was recorded during 24 hours of all day activity on rate-responsive pacing. During exercise in the rate-responsive mode, heart rate increased more on the treadmill than on the bicycle. A majority of the patients (13 of 15) preferred rate-responsive pacing mainly due to less dyspnea and tiredness. Exercise capacity improved significantly both on bicycle (+7%; p < 0.01) and on treadmill (+19%; p < 0.01) during rate-responsive pacing. There were no complications during the follow-up period. In conclusion, the activitysensing pacemaker is a valuable supplement to existing types o/ pacemakers. It should be used in patients in whom an atrial electrogram cannot be used for rate triggering.     

Impact of Right Ventricular Pacing Sites on Exercise Capacity during Ventricular Rate Regularization in Patients with Permanent Atrial Fibrillation

Background: The deleterious effects of right ventricular apical (RVA) pacing may offset the potential benefit of ventricular rate (VR) regularization and rate adaptation during an exercise in patient's atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods: We studied 30 patients with permanent AF and symptomatic bradycardia who receive pacemaker implantation with RVA (n = 15) or right ventricular septal (RVS, n = 15) pacing. All the patients underwent an acute cardiopulmonary exercise testing using VVI‐mode (VVI‐OFF) and VVI‐mode with VR regularization (VRR) algorithm on (VVI‐ON). Results: There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics between the two groups, except pacing QRS duration was significantly shorter during RVS pacing than RVA pacing (138.9 ± 5 vs 158.4 ± 6.1 ms, P = 0.035). Overall, VVI‐ON mode increased the peak exercise VR, exercise time, metabolic equivalents (METs), and peak oxygen consumption (VO₂max), and decreased the VR variability compared with VVI‐OFF mode during exercise (P < 0.05), suggesting that VRR pacing improved exercise capacity during exercise. However, further analysis on the impact of VRR pacing with different pacing sites revealed that only patients with RVS pacing but not patients with RVA pacing had significant increased exercise time, METs, and VO₂max during VVI‐ON compared with VVI‐OFF, despite similar changes in peaked exercise VR and VR variability. Conclusion: In patients with permanent AF, VRR pacing at RVS, but not at RVA, improved exercise capacity during exercise.     

Comparative Functional Effects of Chronic Ventricular Demand and Atrial Synchronous Ventricular Inhibited Pacing

We compared the effects of chronic ventricular inhibited (VVI) and atrial synchronous ventricular inhibited (VDD) pacing on functional capacity in 8 patients with complete atrioventricular heart block. Permanent VDD (Medtronic #2409, ASVIP) pacemakers were implanted in four men and four women (age range 27-76 years, mean 58.9 +/- 18.4 years), and randomly assigned to a three-month period of VDD or VVI pacing in this single blinded, crossover study. Functional capacity was assessed by questionnaire, graded treadmill exercise testing and radionuclide angiocardiography prior to pacemaker implant and following each pacing period. Following 3 months of pacing in each of VVI and VDD pacing modes, maximum heart rate (83.4 +/- 14 vs 134.9 +/- 16.4 beats/min, p less than 0.001) and double product (147.5 +/- 58.3 vs 218.9 +/- 52.7, p less than .001) were greater with VDD pacing. Although exercise duration on treadmill exercise testing (5.3 +/- 2.9 vs 6.9 +/- 3.1 minutes, p less than 0.1) was greater in the VDD mode, the difference was not significant. Similarly, there was no significant difference in functional capacity as measured by questionnaire scores (50.1 +/- 8.4 vs 46.9 +/- 8.9, p less than 0.1) or in left ventricular ejection fraction for the two pacing modes (.54 vs .55, p less than .5). Only one patient reported a subjective improvement with physiologic (VDD) pacing, whereas the remaining patients stated no preference. We conclude that VDD pacing offers improved maximal cardiac work during exercise compared to VVI pacing.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The A-R Interval as Exercise Indicator: A New Option for Rate Adaptation in Single and Dual Chamber Pacing

RUITER, J.H., ET AL.: The A-R Interval as Exercise Indicator: A New Option for Rate Adaptation in Single and Dual Chamber Pacing. We investigated the possibility to use the interval from an atrial stimulus to the Ventricular R wave [A-R interval) as an indicator of physical stress, in 16 patients with pacemakers implanted for severe atrial bradycardia but with intact AV conduction. The A-R interval was studied during incremental atrial pacing at rest and during exercise with a constant workload. In addition, the atrial pacing rate was kept constant just above spontaneous sinus rate and the dynamics of the A-R interval were studied during exercise with a low constant workload and during a maximal exercise test with increasing workload. Incremental atrial pacing prolonged the A-R interval and this response was blunted during exercise [p < 0.003). Atrial pacing at a constant rate and during a constant workload resulted in an almost direct shortening of the A-R interval. When the workload was increased but the atrial rate kept constant, a pronounced shortening of the A-R interval was noted [p < 0.0001). It is concluded that changes of the A-R interval during different kinds of exercise were prompt and predictable in patients with sinus node dysfunction but intact AV conduction. In these patients the shortening of the A-R interval during exercise may be a suitable indicator for rate adaptive atrial pacing.     

QT Sensing Rate Responsive Pacing Compared to Fixed Rate Ventricular Inhibited Pacing: A Controlled Clinical Study

Eighteen patients, five women and 13 men, (mean age 70 +/- S.E.M. 2 years) treated with QT sensing rate responsive pacemakers due to symptomatic high degree AV block took part in a double-blind study, comparing the rate responsive (TX) mode with fixed rate ventricular inhibited (VVI) pacing. The pacemaker was blindly programmed to either mode in a cross-over design. During the 1 month period a daily diary of symptoms (chest pain, vertigo, dyspnea, and palpitations) was kept. At the end of each period, a mental stress test and an exercise test were performed. The patient rated the general well-being and stated a preference for one of the modes. In the TX mode the heart rate was significantly higher at the end of exercise compared with VVI (107 +/- 4 vs 73 +/- 3 bpm; P less than 0.001) and the exercise tolerance was improved by 9% (104 +/- 8 vs 96 +/- 7 W; P less than 0.01). The patients reported significantly less dyspnea and fatigue at comparable workloads with TX pacing. During the mental stress test the pacing rate increased by 10% in the TX mode (from 73 +/- 2 to 82 +/- 4 bpm; P less than 0.001). There was a physiological rate variability on 24-hour Holter monitoring. Ten patients reported a significant improvement in feeling of general well-being in the TX mode. Eleven patients preferred the TX mode, five patients could not distinguish between the modes and two patients preferred the VVI mode due to worsening of angina pectoris with TX pacing. This preference for the TX mode was significant (P less than 0.05). The results of this controlled study indicate that TX is preferable to VVI in most cases, but the worsening of angina pectoris in two of the patients and the occurrence of rapid rate oscillations in a third patient are factors that warrant some caution in selecting patients.     

Comparison of Ventricular Function in Atrial Rate Adaptive Versus Dual Chamber Rate Adaptive Pacing During Exercise

The hemodynamic effects of two different pacing modes—rate adaptive atrial (AAIR) versus dual chamber (DDDR) pacing—were assessed in 12 patients with DDDR pacemakers during upright bicycle exercise first-pass radionuclide angiography using a multiwire gamma camera with tantalum-178 as a tracer. All patients had sinus node disease with intact AV conduction. Patients exercised to the same heart rate in random order in these two different pacing modes, AAIR and DDDR with AV delay (of 100 msec) selected to maintain 100% ventricular capture. Cardiac output in creased significantly above baseline values during exercise in both pacing modes: 154 ± 41% (mean ± SEM, P = 0.002) with AAIR, versus 95 ± 24% (P = 0.004) with DDDR (P = NS between the two modes). The peak filling rate, likewise, increased in both pacing modes (2.3 ± 0.21 end-diastolic volumes/sec to 3.8 ± 0.31 end-diastolic volumes/sec in AAIR [P = 0.0004] and 2.2 ± 0.18 end-diastolic volumes/sec to 3.4 ± 0.27 end-diastolic volumes/sec in DDDR [P = 0.0008]). LV ejection fraction was normal at rest (60 ± 4%, SEM) and did not significantly change with submaximal exercise in either pacing mode (both 56%, P = NS). No significant changes in end-diastolic volume or stroke volume indexes occurred with exercise in either pacing mode. Our study demonstrates that in patients with normal resting LV function, AAIR and DDDR pacing are equally effective in attaining appropriate increases in cardiac output and LV filling during exercise.     

Assessment of the Work Capacity and Relationship Between Rate Response and Exercise Tolerance Associated With Activity-Sensing Rate-Responsive Ventricular Pacing

The relationship between rate response and exercise tolerance was studied by measuring the symptom-limited maximum treadmill time (MTT)both during fixed rate VVI pacing and during VVI + activity mode pacing (RRP) in 15 patients (mean age, 73 years) who had received rate-responsive ventricular pacemakers. Their indications were atrioventricular block, sino-atrial block, and atrial fibrillation with slow ventricular response. Basic rate was programmed to 60 ppm in both pacing modes; rate response and activity threshold were programmed to 5 and medium, respectively. The order in which the two pacing modes were tested was randomly determined. The MTT was, on average, 29% longer in RRP than in VVI mode with a mean of 12 minutes in VVI and 14.8 minutes in RRP (p less than 0.001). For the subgroup of eight patients with paced-only rhythm the average increase in MTT was 38% with a mean of 9.5 minutes in VVI and 12.8 minutes in RRP (p less than 0.01). Seven patients who showed episodes of spontaneous rhythm, increased their average MTT by 17% (mean in VVI, 14.9 minutes; in RRP, 17.1 minutes; p less than 0.02). During RRP, a significant positive correlation existed between MTT and the increase in heart rate (N = 15; r = 0.83; p less than 0.001). In 12 patients with paced-only rhythm, the pacing rate remained at the programmed basic rate when the patients were lying, sitting, and standing and increased to 86 +/- 4 ppm during casual walking, and to 101 +/- 4 ppm during jumping up and down with the pacemaker programmed to the above-mentioned parameters. The maximum pacing rate during jumping corresponded with the maximum pacing rates measured from Holter recordings during normal daily activities.     

A Comparative Study of Activity and Dual Sensor: Activity and Minute Ventilation Pacing Responses to Ascending and Descending Stairs

Previous studies with activity-based rate; adaptive pacemakers have shown a somewhat paradoxical response when comparing ascending stairs to descending stairs. The objective of this investigation was to measure dual-sensor rate response provided by activity and minute ventilation (MV) compared with activity alone, and with a control group, during ascending and descending stairs. For dual sensor mode, measured mean peak pacing rate with 72 (92) steps per minute was 111 ± 13 beats/min (124 ± 14 beats/min) ascending stairs and 81 ± 7 beats/mm (97 ± 13 beats/min) for descending. For activity mode alone, mean peak pacing rate was 90 ± 12 beats/min (108 ± 19 beats/min) ascending stairs and 97 ± 12 beats/min (123 ±17 beats/min) descending. The mean peak control group heart rate ascending stairs for a step rate of 72 (92J steps/min were 116 ± 11 beats/min (127 ±14 beats/min) ascending stairs and for descending 89 ± 12 beats/min (95 ± 11 beats/min). While for dual sensor controlled pacing there was a significant difference for ascending and descending stairs at both step rates, there was no difference between going upstairs and downstairs for activity mode alone. Rates with dual sensor did not significantly differ from respective rates of the control group. The mean correlation coefficient between MV and paced rate was 0.85. Pacing heart rates delivered by the dual sensor mode were appropriate for ascending and descending stairs. In contrast to activity mode alone, the peak heart rates for dual sensor mode are higher during ascending than during descending stairs.