A phase II trial of docetaxel and carboplatin as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: NCCTG study N9932

OBJECTIVE: A phase II multi-institutional clinical trial conducted to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of docetaxel and carboplatin as first-line therapy for women with metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: Patients had histologically confirmed metastatic breast cancer with at least one measurable lesion. Prior adjuvant chemotherapy was permitted, provided that at least 12 months had elapsed between any prior taxane and platinum therapy. Patients received docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) with carboplatin AUC 6 mg/ml.min every 21 days until disease progression or prohibitive toxicity. RESULTS: All 53 patients enrolled were evaluable for response and toxicity. Median number of cycles delivered was 6. Overall response rate was 60%, with 3 complete responses (6%) and 29 partial responses (54%). Median time to disease progression was 9.6 months. Median survival time was 20.4 months. Myelosuppression was the predominant toxicity, with grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurring in 94% of patients and 15% of patients experiencing febrile neutropenia. The overall incidence (grades 1-3) of neurosensory toxicity was 57% and neuromotor toxicity was 25%, respectively, with grade 3 toxicity occurring in 4% of patients each. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of docetaxel and carboplatin is highly active in metastatic breast cancer. Prophylactic growth factor support is recommended in any further evaluation of this combination in the treatment of patients with breast cancer.     

N0332 phase 2 trial of weekly irinotecan hydrochloride and docetaxel in refractory metastatic breast cancer: a North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) Trial

BackgroundBecause of the single-agent activity of irinotecan hydrochloride, combination of irinotecan and docetaxel treatment against metastatic breast cancer (MBC) should be evaluated.Patients and methodsSingle-stage phase 2 study of irinotecan and docetaxel to evaluate tumor response, toxicity, time to progression, and overall survival was carried out. Regimen of docetaxel (25 mg/m²) and irinotecan (70 mg/m²) was administered on days 1 and 8 of each 3-week cycle. Patients had histologically confirmed breast adenocarcinoma and metastatic cancer measurable with RECIST.ResultsOf 70 patients enrolled, 64 were assessable. Prior treatment with an anthracycline and a taxane was required. Eighteen (28%) patients [95% confidence interval (CI) 15% to 31%] had tumor response, plus four patients had stable disease (less than 30% decrease in sum of longest diameter and less than 20% increase) for >6 months. The clinical benefit rate was 34% overall. Median duration of tumor response was 6.7 months (95% CI 4.2–37.7 months); median follow-up was 18.6 months (range 8.5–37.7 months). The most common severe adverse events included fatigue [n = 16 (25%)] and neutropenia [n = 13 (20%)].ConclusionsWeekly dosing of combination of irinotecan and docetaxel is active against MBC. However, the response rate to our regimen was not significantly better than single-agent docetaxel. Other schedules of irinotecan plus docetaxel should be considered for future studies.     

N0539 phase II trial of fulvestrant and bevacizumab in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with an aromatase inhibitor: a North Central Cancer Treatment Group (now Alliance) trial

BackgroundBased on preclinical studies, the vascular endothelial pathway is an important mechanism for estrogen receptor resistance. We conducted a phase II study of fulvestrant and bevacizumab in patients with aromatase inhibitor pretreated metastatic breast cancer.Patients and methodsA single-stage phase II study was conducted with these objectives: 6-month progression-free survival (PFS), tumor response, toxic effect, and overall survival. Regimen: 250 mg fulvestrant days 1 and 15 (cycle 1) then day 1 (cycle 2 and beyond) and 10 mg/kg bevacizumab days 1 and 15 of each 4-week cycle.ResultsAt interim analysis, 20 eligible patients initiated treatment, 11 were progression free and on treatment at 3 months, not meeting the protocol-specified efficacy requirements (at least 12 of 20). Accrual remained open during interim analysis with 36 patients enrolling before final study closure. Among the 33 eligible patients, the median PFS was 6.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.6–10.1 months]. Of the 18 with measurable disease, 4 (22%) patients (95% CI 6% to 48%) had a confirmed tumor response (1 complete, 3 partial). The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were hypertension 3 (9%) and headache 3 (9%).ConclusionsThe fulvestrant/bevacizumab combination is safe and tolerable; however, it did not meet its statistical end point.     

DC方案与DE方案一线治疗转移性乳腺癌的对比研究

目的　比较多西紫杉醇联合卡培他滨（ＤＣ方案）与多西紫杉醇联合表柔比星（ＤＥ方案）一线治疗转移性乳腺癌的疗效及不良反应。方法　６５例转移性乳腺癌患者分别接受ＤＣ方案和ＤＥ方案治疗。ＤＣ方案组：多西紫杉醇７５ｍｇ／ｍ２静滴,ｄ１;卡培他滨２０００ｍｇ／（ｍ２·ｄ）,分两次口服,ｄ１～ｄ１４。ＤＥ方案组：多西紫杉醇７５ｍｇ／ｍ２静滴,ｄ１;表柔比星７５ｍｇ／ｍ２静推,ｄ１。两方案均以２１天为１个周期。结果　ＤＣ方案组有效率高于ＤＥ方案组（６０.６％ ｖｓ．４６.９％,Ｐ＞０.０５）,其中ＤＣ方案组完全缓解率高于ＤＥ方案组（２４.２％ ｖｓ．６.３％）,两组比较差异有统计学意义（Ｐ＜０.０５）。ＤＣ方案组的６个月后疾病无进展率（ＰＦＲ）优于ＤＥ方案组（７２.７％ ｖｓ．６２.５％,Ｐ＞０.０５）。中位无进展生存期（ＰＦＳ）ＤＣ方案组长于ＤＥ方案组（１１.４个月ｖｓ．７.６个月）,两组比较差异有统计学意义（Ｐ＜０.０５）。不良反应以骨髓抑制、胃肠道反应和脱发为主,３、４级手足综合征发生率ＤＣ方案组（２７.３％,９／３３）高于ＤＥ方案组（０）,差异有统计学意义（Ｐ＜０.０５）。结论　ＤＣ方案及ＤＥ方案一线治疗转移性乳腺癌均取得较好疗效,ＤＣ方案可以作为非蒽环类药物有效的一线治疗方案。     

Weekly paclitaxel as first-line chemotherapy for elderly patients with metastatic breast cancer. A multicentre phase II trial

Paclitaxel is a cytotoxic agent with proven antitumour activity in metastatic breast cancer. Weekly administration of paclitaxel has demonstrated sustained efficacy together with a more favourable toxicity profile (e.g. less myelotoxicity) than the 3-weekly administration. This study evaluates the activity and toxicity of weekly paclitaxel (Taxol(R)) as first-line chemotherapy in elderly patients (>70 years of age) with hormone-refractory metastatic breast cancer. Patients with metastatic breast cancer received 80 mg/m(2) paclitaxel administered weekly on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Additional cycles were given until disease progression, or unacceptable toxicity. A dose increase to 90 mg/m(2) was allowed in the absence of toxicity. 26 Patients received a total of 101 cycles (median 4, range 1-11). 22 patients completed at least two cycles (six administrations). In 23 patients who were evaluable for response, there were 10 partial responses (38%), 9 patients with stable disease (35%), while 4 patients had disease progression (15%). The median duration of response was 194 days (>6 months). Overall treatment was relatively well tolerated, but 8 patients (32%) had to prematurely discontinue treatment because of fatigue. Neuropathy >grade 1 was noted only after five or more cycles in 4 patients. Weekly paclitaxel at this dose and schedule is an effective treatment regimen in the elderly patient with metastatic breast cancer, and is feasible, but yields relevant fatigue in a subset of patients.     

Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin for patients with advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer: a North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) phase I study.

BACKGROUND: The study was performed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in patients with advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (ACA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Pancreatic ACA patients, with previously untreated advanced or metastatic disease, were enrolled in a dose escalation study of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin. Oxaliplatin was given intravenously on day 1 and gemcitabine intravenously on days 1 and 8 of a 3-week cycle. Doses of both drugs were increased with sequential cohorts of patients until dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed. RESULTS: A total of 18 patients were enrolled to three dose levels. DLT of neutropenia and a severe infection was noted at a dose of gemcitabine 1250 mg/m2 and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2. Hematological toxicity and nausea and vomiting were the most common grade 3/4 toxicities. The MTD, gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2, was well tolerated. Three confirmed responses were seen. CONCLUSIONS: The MTD of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in patients with pancreatic ACA was determined. A phase II study of this combination is ongoing and will be reported separately at a later date.     

PS-341 and gemcitabine in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) randomized phase II study.

BACKGROUND: PS-341 is a proteasome inhibitor with preclinical activity in pancreatic cancer tumor models and synergistic activity with gemcitabine. This randomized phase II study determined the tumor response rate (RR) for PS-341 alone and the 6-month survival and RR for the combination of gemcitabine and PS-341 in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive 3-week cycles of either arm A: PS-341 1.5 mg/m(2) i.v. bolus (over 3--5 s) on days 1, 4, 8 and 11 or arm B: PS-341 1.0 mg/m(2) (same as arm A otherwise) plus gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) i.v. on days 1 and 8. Patients progressing on arm A were allowed to receive arm B treatment. RESULTS: Arm A: 42 evaluable patients were enrolled with a confirmed RR of 0% (95% CI 0% to 8%), median survival of 2.5 months (95% CI 2.0-3.3), and median time to progression (TTP) of 1.2 months (95% CI 1.1--1.3). Twelve of 43 evaluable patients (28%) experienced at least one grade 4+ AE. Arm B: 39 evaluable patients yielded a 6-month survival rate of 41% (16/39, 95% CI 29.8% to 67.0%), median survival of 4.8 months (95% CI 2.4--7.4), median TTP of 2.4 months (95% CI 1.5--3.1), and confirmed RR of 10% (4 partial responses/0 complete responses, 95% CI 3% to 24%). Eleven of 43 evaluable patients (26%) experienced at least one grade 4+ AE. One patient had grade 5 hypotension. CONCLUSION: The use of PS-341 alone or in combination with gemcitabine did not result in an overall survival and RR better than that expected for gemcitabine alone. Based on the lack of efficacy and the toxicity seen in our trial, there does not appear to be a role for PS-341 in pancreatic adenocarcinoma with either of the schedules used in this trial.     

The Breast Avastin Trial: phase II study of bevacizumab maintenance therapy after induction chemotherapy with docetaxel and capecitabine for the first-line treatment of patients with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer

Background

Therapeutic approach for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is still controversial. This study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in combination with docetaxel plus capecitabine as first-line treatment for MBC. The feasibility of bevacizumab maintenance therapy in this setting was also evaluated.

Patients and methods

In this single-arm, multicenter phase II study, patients received bevacizumab 15 mg/kg and docetaxel 60 mg/m² on day 1, plus capecitabine 900 mg/m² twice daily on days 1–14 every 21 days. Treatment was administered for up to 6 cycles, then bevacizumab continued until progressive disease. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary end points were tumor response rate, overall survival, and toxicity.

Results

Seventy-nine eligible patients were treated with bevacizumab in combination with docetaxel plus capecitabine. The overall response rate was 61 %, with a complete response rate of 8 % and a median duration of response of 10 months. At a median follow-up of 28 months, the median PFS was 11 months. Fifty-two (65 %) patients received bevacizumab maintenance therapy for a median duration of 7 months (range 1 to 33+). Neutropenia was the most common grade 3–4 toxicity (28.1 % of patients), and two fatal adverse events occurred (septic shock and gastrointestinal perforation).

Conclusions

Bevacizumab in combination with docetaxel and capecitabine demonstrates significant activity and quite acceptable toxicity profile as first-line treatment of MBC. Subsequent maintenance therapy with bevacizumab is feasible for a long period of stable disease. Results deserve confirmation.     

Vinorelbine and docetaxel as first-line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a combination of vinorelbine (VNR) and docetaxel (DOC) as first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study group comprised 40 women with untreated metastatic breast cancer with visceral (85%) and bone (70%) metastases. Of the 40 patients, 24 (60%) had previously received adjuvant chemotherapy, which had included anthracyclines in 12 patients (30%). Treatment consisted of VNR 25 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 5, and DOC 75 mg/m(2) on day 1 every 3 weeks. Depending on the neutrophil nadir (grade 3 or 4 neutropenia by WHO criteria) recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) 5 micro g/kg on days 2-4 and 6-13 was given for all subsequent treatment cycles. RESULTS: The overall response rate (ORR) was 40% (95% confidence interval, CI 15-65). Six patients (15%) achieved a complete response (CR) and ten patients (25%) achieved a partial response (PR). Stable disease (SD) was observed in six patients (15%), and 18 patients (45%) had progressive disease (PD). The median duration of response was 8 months and the median predictive time to progression (TTP) was 6 months. The main toxicity was neutropenia grade 3 and 4 in 28 patients (70%). Febrile neutropenia requiring hospitalization occurred in 12 patients (30%). Grade 3 or 4 anemia was seen in two patients (5%) and grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia was seen in one patient (2.5%). Severe nonhematologic toxicity, except alopecia, was uncommon and included stomatitis in two patients (5%), vomiting in two (5%) and diarrhea in one (2.5%). There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of VNR and DOC at the doses used in this study showed moderate activity as first-line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer. Neutropenia was considerable despite G-CSF administration.     

Gemcitabine as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a phase II trial.

OBJECTIVES: This phase II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). METHODS: Women with histologically or cytologically confirmed bidimensionally measurable MBC not amendable to curative surgery or radiation were eligible. Prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease was not permitted. Patients received gemcitabine 1,200 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8 and 15 for 3 weeks every 28 days for a maximum of 8 cycles. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients, with a median age of 58 years, were enrolled. The overall response rate for the 35 evaluable patients was 37.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 21.5-55.1%), with 2 complete responses and 11 partial responses. Median time to progression and survival were 5.1 months (95% CI, 3.5-8.8 months) and 21.1 months (95% CI, 11.0-26.9 months), respectively. Chemotherapy was well tolerated, with a median of 4 cycles completed. Grade 4 toxicities were 1 infection and 1 abnormal pulmonary function. Grade 3 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 30.3% and 6.3% of patients, respectively. The most common grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity was nausea/vomiting (10.3%). Five of 21 patients had improved Karnofsky performance status (KPS) scores. CONCLUSION: Single-agent gemcitabine is active and well tolerated as first-line treatment in patients with MBC.     

A multicenter phase II trial of docetaxel and capecitabine as salvage treatment in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of docetaxel plus capecitabine (DC) combination as salvage treatment in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

Patients and treatment

Patients with MBC who had disease progression after initial chemotherapy with anthracyclines (n?=?29; 100?%) and taxanes (n?=?11; 37.9?%) were treated with oral capecitabine 950?mg/m² twice daily on days 1?C14 and docetaxel 75?mg/m² on day 1 every 3?weeks. Nineteen (65.5?%) patients received this regimen as second line and 10 (34.5?%) as???3rd line of therapy. All patients were evaluable for response and toxicity.

Results

Complete response occurred in two (6.9?%) patients and partial response in eleven (37.9?%) for an overall response rate of 44.8?% (95?% CI 26.7?C62.9?%). Eleven women (37.9?%) had stable disease and five (17.2?%) progressive disease. Of the eleven patients previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes, five (45.5?%) responded to DC combination. The median duration of response was 5.7?months (range 3.4?C64.2), the median time to disease progression 9.3?months (range 1.2?C58), and the median overall survival 25.5?months. No toxic death occurred. Neutropenia grade 4 occurred in 58.6?% of patients and three of them (10.3?%) developed neutropenic fever. Non-hematological toxicities were manageable with grade 3 hand-foot syndrome occurring in 6.9?% of the patients, fatigue in 3.4?%, and neurotoxicity in 3.4?%.

Conclusion

The DC combination is a valuable regimen as salvage treatment in anthracycline- or anthracycline and taxane-pretreated patients with MBC.     

Biweekly docetaxel and vinorelbine as first-line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer

This study was designed to evaluate the antitumor activity and tolerance of biweekly docetaxel plus vinorelbine as first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Forty-one patients with measurable disease and no prior chemotherapy for MBC were treated with docetaxel 60 mg/m(2) plus vinorelbine 30 mg/m(2) on day 1, every 2 weeks for a maximum of 12 courses. Median age was 58 years (range, 23-75). Fourteen patients (34.1%) were premenopausal and 27 (65.9%) were postmenopausal. Most patients had received prior neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 27, 65.9%), radiation therapy (n = 22, 53.6%), and hormone therapy (n = 21, 51.2%). The most frequent sites of metastasis were bone (n = 18, 43.9%), pleuropulmonary (n = 16, 39%), and liver (n = 14, 34.1%). Twenty-seven patients (65.9%) had more than one site of metastasis. Three hundred and thirty-nine courses were given (median, 8 courses per patient; range, 1-12). Median relative dose intensity was 85% for both docetaxel and vinorelbine. Grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia (14 patients, 34.1%), febrile neutropenia (n = 14, 34.1%), and stomatitis (n = 4, 9.8%). No treatment-related deaths were reported. All patients were assessed for response in an intent-to-treat analysis. Four patients (9.8%) had a complete response and 19 (46.3%) had a partial response (overall response rate, 56.1%; 95% CI, 42%-70%). Six patients (14.6%) had stable disease and 12 patients (29.3%) had progressive disease. With a median follow-up of 15.1 months or until death, median duration of response is 12.6 months. Median time to progression is 12.4 months. Median survival time is 19.6 months. This biweekly combination of docetaxel plus vinorelbine is feasible and active as first-line chemotherapy in patients with MBC. This regimen is safe and well tolerated.     

Multicenter phase II study of oral capecitabine plus irinotecan as first-line chemotherapy in advanced colorectal cancer: a Korean Cancer Study Group trial

A phase II study was conducted to assess the efficacy and tolerability of capecitabine in combination with irinotecan (CAPIRI) in advanced colorectal cancer. Forty-seven patients with previously untreated metastatic or unresectable colorectal adenocarcinoma received capecitabine 1000 mg/m² twice daily on days 2-15 and intravenous irinotecan 100 mg/m² on days 1 and 8, every 21 days. A total of 268 cycles of chemotherapy (median 6: range 1-11) were administered. According to an intent-to-treat analysis, the overall response rate was 49% (95% CI, 35-63%). Median time to progression and overall survival were 7.5 months (95% CI, 4.8-10.2) and 19.5 months (95% CI, 15.7-23.8), respectively. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were diarrhea (24%) and neutropenia (11%). There were no treatment-related deaths. These results indicate that CAPIRI has comparable activity and tolerability to FOLFIRI as first-line treatment for advanced colorectal cancer.     

Randomized phase III trial of capecitabine compared with bevacizumab plus capecitabine in patients with previously treated metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial compared the efficacy and safety of capecitabine with or without bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody to vascular endothelial growth factor, in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with an anthracycline and a taxane. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive capecitabine (2,500 mg/m2/d) twice daily on day 1 through 14 every 3 weeks, alone or in combination with bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) on day 1. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS), as determined by an independent review facility. RESULTS: From November 2000 to March 2002, 462 patients were enrolled. Treatment arms were balanced. No significant differences were found in the incidence of diarrhea, hand-foot syndrome, thromboembolic events, or serious bleeding episodes between treatment groups. Of other grade 3 or 4 adverse events, only hypertension requiring treatment (17.9% v 0.5%) was more frequent in patients receiving bevacizumab. Combination therapy significantly increased the response rates (19.8% v 9.1%; P = .001); however, this did not result in a longer PFS (4.86 v 4.17 months; hazard ratio = 0.98). Overall survival (15.1 v 14.5 months) and time to deterioration in quality of life as measured by the Functional Assessment Of Cancer Treatment--Breast were comparable in both treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Bevacizumab was well tolerated in this heavily pretreated patient population. Although the addition of bevacizumab to capecitabine produced a significant increase in response rates, this did not translate into improved PFS or overall survival.     

Randomized phase III trial comparing docetaxel plus epirubicin versus docetaxel plus capecitabine as first-line treatment in women with advanced breast cancer

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to compare docetaxel plus epirubicin versus docetaxel plus capecitabine combinations as front-line treatment in women with advanced breast cancer (ABC).Patients and MethodsPreviously untreated patients with ABC were randomly assigned to receive docetaxel 75 mg/m² plus epirubicin 75 mg/m² (DE) on day 1 or docetaxel 75 mg/m² on day 1 plus capecitabine 950 mg/m² orally twice daily on days 1–14 (DC) in 21-day cycles. Previous anthracycline-based (neo)-adjuvant chemotherapy was allowed if completed >1 year before enrollment. The primary objective of the study was to compare time to disease progression (TTP).ResultsOne hundred and thirty-six women were treated on each arm and median TTP was 10.6 versus 11.0 months (P = 0.7), for DE and DC, respectively. According to RECIST criteria we observed 15 (11%) versus 11 (8%) complete responses and 55 (40%) versus 61 (45%) partial responses (P = 0.8), with DE and DC, respectively. Severe toxicity included grade 3–4 neutropenia (57% versus 46%; P = 0.07), febrile neutropenia (11% versus 8%; P = 0.4), hand–foot syndrome (0% versus 4%; P = 0.02), grade 2–3 anemia (20% versus 7%; P = 0.001) and asthenia (12% versus 6%; P = 0.09) with DE and DC, respectively.ConclusionsThe DE and DC regimens have similar efficacy but different toxicity. Either regimen can be used as front-line treatment of ABC.     

Phase II trial of bevacizumab in combination with weekly docetaxel in metastatic breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of bevacizumab and weekly docetaxel as first- or second-line therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven MBC patients received i.v. bevacizumab at 10 mg/kg on days 1 and 15 in combination with i.v. docetaxel 35 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Primary end points were to assess toxicity, overall response rate, and progression-free survival. A secondary end point was to assess the relationship between plasma endothelial and cell adhesion markers and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: One-hundred fifty-eight treatment cycles were administered with a median of six cycles (range 1-15 cycles) per patient. The most common grade 4 toxicities per patient were as follows: 2 (7%)-pulmonary embolus, 1 (4%)-febrile neutropenia, and 1 (4%)-infection; grade 3 toxicities were 4 (15%)-neutropenia, 4 (15%)-fatigue, 2 (7%)-neuropathy, 2 (7%)-athralgias, 2 (7%)-stomatitis, 1 (7%)-pleural effusion, and 1 (4%)-hypertension. The overall response rate was 52% [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 32-71%], median response duration was 6.0 months (95% CI, 4.6-6.5 months), and the median progression-free survival was 7.5 months (95% CI, 6.2-8.3 months). In hypothesis-generating univariate and limited multivariate analyses, E-selectin was statistically significantly associated with response to the combination. CONCLUSION: Bevazicumab in combination with weekly docetaxel is active with acceptable toxicities in MBC. Additional studies evaluating E-selectin as a marker of response to bevacizumab-containing chemotherapy are warranted.