Métastases cérébrales des cancers bronchiques non à petites cellules : traitement systémique

Chemotherapy, as all systemic treatments, is generally effective in brain metastases because the brain blood barrier (BBB) does not affect treatment's diffusion. Platinum-based chemotherapy provides response rates ranging from 23 to 50% for brain metastases. Anti-EGFR therapies are effective mostly when a somatic EGFR activating mutation is detected, or in selected population (adenocarcinoma, Asian population, never-smokers and women): response rate ranges from 38 to 69.6%. Bevacizumab is now allowed for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with brain metastases and non-squamous histology. The presence of untreated brain metastases may not influence its efficacy combined with paclitaxel-carboplatin. The best sequence for multimodality management of brain metastases has to be established but upfront systemic treatments in patients with asymptomatic brain metastases is a valid option.     

Gefitinib as first-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with activating epidermal growth factor receptor mutation: Review of the evidence

Gefitinib is a small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Since 2004, it was clear that a substantial proportion of non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLC) obtaining objective response when treated with gefitinib harbour activating mutations in the EGFR gene. Consequently, EGFR mutation has been widely studied, together with other molecular characteristics, as a potential predictive factor for gefitinib efficacy. As of August 2010, four East Asian randomized phase III trials comparing gefitinib to platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) eligible for first-line treatment have been reported or published. Two of these trials were conducted without a molecular selection in patients with clinical characteristics (adenocarcinoma histology, never or light smoking) characterized by higher prevalence of EGFR mutation. In patients selected for the presence of tumor harbouring EGFR mutation, the administration of first-line gefitinib, as compared to standard chemotherapy, was associated with longer progression-free survival, higher objective response rate, a more favourable toxicity profile and better quality of life. The relevant improvement in progression-free survival with first-line administration of gefitinib has been confirmed in the other two randomized trials, dedicated to cases with EGFR mutation. In July 2009, European Medicines Agency granted marketing authorization for gefitinib for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC with sensitizing mutations of the EGFR gene, across all lines of therapy. Gefitinib currently represents the best first-line treatment option for this molecularly selected subgroup of patients.     

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors as initial therapy for non-small cell lung cancer: Focus on epidermal growth factor receptor mutation testing and mutation-positive patients

Activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathway has been implicated in tumorigenesis in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the most common type of lung cancer. As a result, EGFR has become a key focus for the development of personalized therapy, with several molecular biomarkers having been investigated as potential predictors of response with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in NSCLC (e.g., EGFR expression, EGFR gene copy gain, and EGFR mutations). Of these, activating mutations in EGFR have thus far given the most consistent results based on the available evidence from preclinical studies and clinical trials. In an attempt to identify patients who are most likely to benefit from treatment with EGFR TKIs, EGFR mutation testing is being increasingly utilized in clinical practice. Currently in the United States, no EGFR TKI or accompanying mutational test is approved for the identification and first-line treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC. However, the first-generation EGFR TKIs, erlotinib and gefitinib, as well as investigational ErbB family TKIs and EGFR mutation testing methods are being evaluated in this setting. This review will discuss EGFR mutation testing as a biomarker of response to EGFR TKIs and the evolution of EGFR mutational analysis in NSCLC. Completed and ongoing clinical trials evaluating currently available or investigational EGFR TKIs as first-line therapy in molecularly and clinically selected patients with NSCLC, with a focus on trials in patients whose tumors have EGFR mutations, will also be reviewed.     

Driven by Mutations: The Predictive Value of Mutation Subtype in EGFR-Mutated Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

EGFR-mutated NSCLC is a genetically heterogeneous disease that includes more than 200 distinct mutations. The implications of mutational subtype for both prognostic and predictive value are being increasingly understood. Although the most common EGFR mutations—exon 19 deletions or L858R mutations—predict sensitivity to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), it is now being recognized that outcomes may be improved in patients with exon 19 deletions. Additionally, 10% of patients will have an uncommon EGFR mutation, and response to EGFR TKI therapy is highly variable depending on the mutation. Given the growing recognition of the genetic and clinical variation seen in this disease, the development of comprehensive bioinformatics-driven tools to both analyze response in uncommon mutation subtypes and inform clinical decision making will be increasingly important. Clinical trials of novel EGFR TKIs should prospectively account for the presence of uncommon mutation subtypes in study design.     

Emergence of RET rearrangement co-existing with activated EGFR mutation in EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients who had progressed on first- or second-generation EGFR TKI

ObjectivesThe gatekeeper mutation T790M mutation is the responsible for the majority of the resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Other previously described resistance mechanisms include HER2 amplification, MET amplification, PIK3CA mutation, epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT), small cell transformation have also been identified. However other resistance mechanisms remains to be discovered.Materials and methodsHybrid-capture based comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) was performed on pre- and post-EGFR TKI progression EGFR-mutated NSCLC tumor samples during routine clinical care. We identify two paired pre- and post-EGFR TKI progression EGFR-mutated NSCLC patient tumor samples where both post EGFR TKI samples harbored in-frame CCDC6-RET rearrangements but not in the pre-EGFR TKI tumor samples. Furthermore analysis of the clinical database revealed one additional NCOA4-RET rearrangement co-existing with activated EGFR mutation in an EGFR-mutated NSCLC patient who had progressed on afatinib. None of the known resistance mechanisms to EGFR TKI including EGFR T790M, EGFR amplification, HER2 amplification, MET amplification, PIK3CA mutation, BRAF mutation, EMT or small cell transformation was identified in the three post progression samples that now harbored RET rearrangements.Results and conclusionsThis is the first report of RET rearrangement co-existing with activated EGFR mutations in EGFR-mutated patients who had progressed on either first- or second generation EGFR TKI. As such, RET rearrangement may serve as a potential resistance mechanism to EGFR TKI in EGFR-mutated NSCLC.     

Comprehensive Analysis of EGFR-Mutant Abundance and Its Effect on Efficacy of EGFR TKIs in Advanced NSCLC with EGFR Mutations

IntroductionA qualitative detection method for EGFR mutations is not sufficient to guide precise targeted therapy in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between the abundance of EGFR mutations and efficacy of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).MethodsWe used the amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS) method optimized with competitive blockers and specific mutation quantitation (ARMS+) to quantitatively evaluate the abundance of EGFR mutations in 201 patients with advanced NSCLC. A cutoff value of the abundance of EGFR mutations was determined by receiver operating characteristic analysis in a training group and validated in a validation group.ResultsThe abundance of EGFR activating mutation by ARMS+ was significantly associated with objective response to EGFR TKIs. The abundance of 19DEL was significantly higher than that of L858R, with cutoff values for 19DEL and L858R of 4.9% and 9.5%, respectively. The median progression-free survival in the high group was significantly longer than that in the low group (19DEL, 15.0 versus 2.0 months [p < 0.001] and L858R, 12.3 versus 2.0 months [p < 0.001]) in the training set. Similar results were also observed in the validation set. Nine of 13 patients harboring T790M mutation achieved a partial response to EGFR TKIs. Most (seven of nine) were identified to have a low abundance of T790M mutation. The abundance of EGFR mutations appeared to be more significantly associated with the copy number of EGFR mutations from circulating tumor DNA in 19DEL group.ConclusionThe abundance of EGFR activating mutation by ARMS+ was significantly associated with objective response to EGFR TKIs. The abundance of EGFR^T790M mutation may have an adverse impact on progression-free survival rather than on objective response rate in patients with advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC treated with EGFR TKIs.     

Revisiting Clinical Trials Using EGFR Inhibitor-Based Regimens in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis of an MD Anderson Cancer Center Phase I Population

Purpose

Single-agent EGFR inhibitor therapy is effective mainly in patients with lung cancer and EGFR mutations. Treating patients who develop resistance, or who are insensitive from the outset, often because of resistant mutations, other aberrations or the lack of an EGFR mutation, probably requires rational combinations. We therefore investigated the outcome of EGFR inhibitor-based combination regimens in patients with heavily-pretreated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) referred to a Phase I Clinic.

Methods

We reviewed the electronic records of patients with NSCLC treated with an EGFR inhibitor-based combination regimen: erlotinib and cetuximab; erlotinib, cetuximab and bevacizumab; erlotinib and dasatinib; erlotinib and bortezomib; or cetuximab and sirolimus.

Results

EGFR mutations were detected in 16% of patients (21/131). EGFR inhibitor-based combination regimens were administered to 15 patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC and 24 with EGFR wild-type disease. Stable disease (SD) ≥6 months/partial remission (PR) was attained in 20% of EGFR-mutant patients (3/15; two with sensitive mutations and secondary resistance to prior erlotinib, and one with a resistant mutation), as well as 26% of evaluable patients (5/19) with wild-type disease. One of three evaluable patients with squamous cell histology achieved SD for 26.5 months (EGFR wild-type, TP53-mutant, regimen=erlotinib, cetuximab and bevacizumab).

Conclusions

Eight of 34 evaluable patients (24%) with advanced, refractory NSCLC evaluable for response achieved SD ≥6 months/PR (PR=3; SD ≥6 months=5) on EGFR inhibitor-based combination regimens (erlotinib, cetuximab; erlotinib, cetuximab and bevacizumab; and, erlotinib, bortezomib), including patients with secondary resistance to single-agent EGFR inhibitors, resistant mutations, wild-type disease, and, squamous histology.     

Digital PCR analysis of plasma cell-free DNA for non-invasive detection of drug resistance mechanisms in EGFR mutant NSCLC: Correlation with paired tumor samples

As the development of resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has become an issue of concern, identification of the mechanisms responsible has become an urgent priority. However, for research purposes, it is not easy to obtain tumor samples from patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that has relapsed after treatment with EGFR-TKIs. Here, using digital PCR assay as an alternative and noninvasive method, we examined plasma and tumor samples from patients with relapsed NSCLC to establish the inter-relationships existing among T790M mutation, activating EGFR mutations, HER2 amplification, and MET amplification. Paired samples of tumor and blood were obtained from a total of 18 patients with NSCLC after they had developed resistance to EGFR-TKI treatment, and the mechanisms of resistance were analyzed by digital PCR. Digital PCR analysis of T790M mutation in plasma had a sensitivity of 81.8% and specificity of 85.7%, the overall concordance between plasma and tissue samples being 83.3%. MET gene copy number gain in tumor DNA was observed by digital PCR in three patients, of whom one exhibited positivity for MET amplification by FISH, whereas no patient demonstrated MET and HER2 copy number gain in plasma DNA. Digital PCR analysis of plasma is feasible and accurate for detection of T790M mutation in NSCLC that becomes resistant to treatment with EGFR-TKIs.     

A Phase II Study of Gefitinib With Concurrent Thoracic Radiotherapy in Patients With Unresectable,Stage III Non–small-cell Lung Cancer Harboring EGFR Mutations (WJOG6911L)

Locally advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is curable. Standard treatment is concurrent chemoradiotherapy, but its efficacy with cytotoxic agents seems to reach a plateau. Among patients with advanced NSCLC who have epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation, EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor is the key drug. Thus, a similar strategy should be tested in patients with locally advanced NSCLC who have EGFR mutation. This single arm, phase II study aims to explore the efficacy and tolerability of gefitinib with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy in patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival rate at 2 years. The secondary endpoints are overall response rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. A total of 27 patients will be enrolled in this trial.     

EGFR mutation status and survival after diagnosis of brain metastasis in nonsmall cell lung cancer

A small subset of patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harbors mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) that predict unique sensitivity to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). The characteristics and behavior of brain metastases (BMs) in these patients have not been well described. The longitudinal records of all NSCLC patients who underwent EGFR mutation screening at our center from August 2004 to November 2008 were reviewed for eligibility, and 93 patients were identified who developed BM during the course of their disease. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and the log-rank test. Multivariable predictors were assessed via the Cox proportional hazards model. Among the 93 patients with BM, 41 (44%) had mutations in EGFR, including 13 exon 19 deletions and 12 L858R mutations. Eighty-three percent of patients with BM were treated initially with whole brain radiation, either alone (53%) or in combination with craniotomy for neurosurgical resection (22%) or stereotactic radiosurgery (8%). Median survival from the time of BM was 11.7 months and was longer for patients with an EGFR mutation (14.5 vs 7.6 months, P = .09). On multivariable analysis, EGFR mutation (HR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.30–0.82), age (HR: 1.03, 95% CI: 1.00–1.05), and active extracranial disease (HR: 3.30, 95% CI: 1.70–6.41) were independently associated with survival. In NSCLC patients with BM, EGFR mutation status is associated with improved survival, independent of age, functional status, extracranial disease status, and number of BMs.     

The Role of Smoking Status on the Progression‐Free Survival of Non‐Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Harboring Activating Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Mutations Receiving First‐Line EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Versus Platinum Doublet Chemotherapy: A Meta‐Analysis of Prospective Randomized Trials

Background.

Univariate analyses from several randomized phase III trials seemed to suggest ever-smokers with advanced mutated epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFRm) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) did not seem to benefit from EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) as first-line treatment when compared with platinum-doublet chemotherapy as measured by progression-free survival (PFS).

Methods.

A literature-based meta-analysis of PFS outcomes as measured by log-transformed pooled hazard ratio (HR) was performed using a random-effect model. Pooled HRs for smoking status, age, gender, ethnicity, type of EGFR mutation, and EGFR TKI were obtained. Comparison of the pooled HR was performed by metaregression analysis.

Results.

Among the 1,649 EGFRm NSCLC patients analyzed from 7 prospective randomized trials (WJTOG3405, NEJ002, EURTAC, OPTIMAL, LUX Lung-3, LUX Lung-6, and ENSURE), 83.7% were Asians, and 30.0% were ever-smokers. An equal percentage of ever-smokers received doublet chemotherapy (30.2%) or EGFR TKI (30.0%). The pooled HR for PFS was 0.29 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.21–0.39) for never-smokers and 0.54 (95% CI: 0.38–0.76) for ever-smokers (p < .007 by metaregression). The pooled PFS HR for exon 19 deletion was 0.25 (95% CI: 0.19–0.31) and 0.44 for exon 21 substitution (95% CI: 0.34–0.57) (p < .001 by metaregression analysis). The pooled PFS HR was 0.33 (95% CI: 0.24–0.46) for Asians and 0.48 for non-Asians (95% CI: 0.28–0.84) (p = .261 by metaregression analysis).

Conclusion.

EGFRm NSCLC patients derived significant PFS benefit from TKI over platinum-doublet chemotherapy as first-line treatment regardless of smoking status; however, PFS benefit is significantly better in never-smokers by metaregression analysis.     

Combining AKT inhibition with chloroquine and gefitinib prevents compensatory autophagy and induces cell death in EGFR mutated NSCLC cells

Although non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR mutation positive (EGFR M+) tumors initially respond well to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) monotherapy, the responses are usually incomplete. In this study we show that AKT inhibition, most importantly AKT2 inhibition, synergises with EGFR TKI inhibition to increase cell killing in EGFR M+ NSCLC cells. However, our data also suggest that the synergistic pro-apoptotic effects may be stunted due to a prosurvival autophagy response induced by AKT inhibition. Consequently, inhibiting autophagy with chloroquine significantly enhanced tumor cell death induced by gefitinib and AKT inhibitors in EGFR M+ cells in vitro, and produced greater tumor shrinkage in EGFR M+ xenografts in vivo. Together, our findings suggest that adding chloroquine to EGFR and AKT inhibition has the potential to improve tumor responses in EGFR M+ NSCLC, and that selective targeting of AKT2 may provide a new treatment option in NSCLC.     

Survival and prognosis analyses of concurrent PIK3CA mutations in EGFR mutant non-small cell lung cancer treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors

In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation, the prognostic impact of a concurrent Phosphoinositide-3-kinase catalytic alpha polypeptide (PIK3CA) mutation was still unknown. Some studies have shown that EGFR mutant NSCLC patients treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) when concurrent PIK3CA mutation have a worse prognosis and shorter survival time. This study conducted a retrospective analysis of NSCLC patients with EGFR mutant or concurrent PIK3CA mutations from January 2015 to October 2019 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University. Relative to EGFR alone mutations (Single-Mt), we found that NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations coexisting with PIK3CA mutations (Double-Mt) treated with EGFR-TKIs had a shorter median time to progression (TTP): 7.8 months versus 10.9 months (Double-Mt versus Single-Mt, P = 0.001), and decrease in median overall survival (OS): 20.6 months versus 32.4 months (P < 0.001). The objective response rate (ORR) between Double-Mt and Single-Mt was 36.7% versus 61.9% (P = 0.044), disease control rates (DCR) was 80.1% versus 91.7% (P = 0.179). Obviously, EGFR-TKIs for EGFR mutate NSCLC patients when concurrent PIK3CA mutations have a worse prognosis and shorter survival time.     

Survival Disparities in Black Patients With EGFR-mutated Non–small-cell Lung Cancer

BackgroundLittle is known about the difference between black and non-black patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), particularly regarding survival. We thus characterized the EGFR expression profile, clinical characteristics, and survival outcome in these patients.Patient and MethodsWe reviewed the cancer registry and patient charts at a New York-Bronx network (n = 2773) treating a large population of minority patients, for non-squamous NSCLC (n = 1986) diagnosed between 2009 and 2015. Survival was adjusted for smoking, gender, age, weight, and stage.ResultsThe EGFR mutation rate was 15% (98/652) in tested patients (black, 14%; non-black, 16%). There was no significant difference between the 2 cohorts with respect to age at diagnosis, gender, presenting stages, and socioeconomic status. On the other hand, weight was noted to be heavier in black patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC than their non-black counterparts (P = .012). After adjusting for gender, age, smoking status, weight, and stage, the multivariate analysis revealed no racial disparity in survival among patients with wild-type EGFR (P = .774); However, among patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC, black patients had shorter survival in comparison with non-black patients (P = .001), with 2-year survival rates being 33% versus 61%, respectively. Such shorter survival was also observed among EGFR-inhibitor treated patients with common EGFR mutations (P = .040).ConclusionsTo our knowledge, this is the first report of inferior survival among black patients with NSCLC with EGFR mutations, relative to non-black patients. The survival disparities suggest the need of more tailored management for this patient population.     

Efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors versus chemotherapy as second-line treatment in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with wild-type EGFR: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials

Background

EGFR mutation status is closely related to the efficacy of EGFR-TKIs in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). EGFR-TKIs have become the standard first-line treatment for advanced EGFR-mutation NSCLC, while for EGFR wild-type tumors, the preferred first-line treatment is chemotherapy. However, the efficacy of EGFR-TKIs as second-line treatment in EGFR wild-type NSCLC remains controversial. We sought to evaluate the effectiveness of EGFR-TKI as second-line treatment in EGFR wild-type NSCLC.

Methods

Randomized controlled trials that compared EGFR-TKIs with chemotherapy in previously treated advanced NSCLC with wild-type EGFR were included. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of EGFR-TKIs compared with standard chemotherapy. The endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR).

Results

Six randomized controlled trials with a total of 990 patients with wild-type EGFR were included: 499 in the EGFR-TKIs group and 491 in the chemotherapy group. The results indicated that in the second-line treatment of EGFR wild-type advanced NSCLC, PFS was significantly inferior in the EGFR-TKIs group versus the chemotherapy group (HR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.20–1.56, P < 0.00001). However, this significant difference did not translate into OS (HR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.87–1.20, P = 0.81). ORR tended to favor chemotherapy but there was no significant difference compared with EGFR-TKI (RR = 1.77, 95% CI = 0.90–3.50, P = 0.10).

Conclusions

Chemotherapy improves PFS significantly but not OS, compared with EGFR-TKIs as a second-line treatment in advanced NSCLC with wild-type EGFR. Whether EGFR-TKIs should be used in EGFR wild-type patients should be considered carefully.     

EGFR High Copy Number Together With High EGFR Protein Expression Predicts Improved Outcome for Cetuximab-based Therapy in Squamous Cell Lung Cancer: Analysis From SWOG S0819, a Phase III Trial of Chemotherapy With or Without Cetuximab in Advanced NSCLC

BackgroundThe phase III S0819 trial investigated addition of cetuximab to first-line chemotherapy (CT) in NSCLC. Subgroup analyses suggested an OS benefit among patients with EGFR copy number gain in squamous cell carcinomas (SCC), (HR = 0.58 [0.39-0.86], P = .0071). A more detailed model based on EGFR FISH, EGFR IHC and KRAS mutation status was evaluated to yield a more precise predictive paradigm of cetuximab-based therapy in advanced NSCLC.MethodsFISH was performed using the Colorado Scoring Criteria; H-Score was used to quantify EGFR IHC expression (cut-off ≥ 200). A Cox model was used to assess treatment effects for OS and PFS within biomarker and clinical subgroups. KRAS mutation was analyzed using Therascreen. The false discovery rate controlled for multiple comparisons. S0819 ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00946712.ResultsOf 1,313 eligible patients, assay results were obtained for FISH on 976 patients (41% positive), for IHC on 945 patients (31% positive), and KRAS mutation status on 627 patients (26% positive). In SCC patients, OS was significantly improved with addition of cetuximab when both EGFR FISH and EGFR IHC were positive (N = 58), (OS HR: 0.32 [95% CI 0.18-0.59]; P = .0002, q = 0.08), median 12.6 versus 4.6 months. The results were independent of KRAS mutation status. In Non-SCC, no predictive value of EGFR IHC, EGFR FISH status and/or KRAS status was seen.ConclusionsIn NSCLC SCC, a combination index of EGFR FISH plus EGFR IHC results was associated with improved OS when cetuximab was added to CT, representing a potential predictive molecular paradigm for patients suitable for EGFR-antibody therapy.     

Efficacy of Osimertinib in Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients with EGFR Gene Mutation–Case Report and a Literature Review

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common type of lung cancer and the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. It is responsible for 80–85% of lung cancer cases. NSCLC can be divided into several groups, led by adenocarcinoma (ADC)–40–50% and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC)–20–30%. The development of new molecular therapies targeting particular abnormalities such as mutations in the EGFR (Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor) gene or ROS1 or ALK genes rearrangements resolved in novel strategies in advanced NSCLC management. EGFR mutation occurs mostly in patients with ADC and those patients are mostly females with no or light smoking history. The hereby presented patient fitted the ADC characteristics, while they were diagnosed with SCC. The unusual diagnosis implied further genetic testing, which established the occurrence of L858R substitution in exon 21 in the EGFR gene. A 63-year-old female was admitted to the unit due to a dry cough, pain in the right chest area and dyspnoea. When diagnosed, the patient had a peripheral mass in the right lung superior lobe (55 × 40 mm), satellite nodules in the apex of the same lung and packets of disintegrating lymph nodes. Positron Emission Tomography (PET-CT) confirmed a diffuse neoplastic process qualified as stage IV on the TNM scale. Due to EGFR gene mutation, the woman was administered osimertinib, however, the treatment did not succeed, and other therapeutic solutions were undertaken. The patient died 10 months after diagnosis. Patients with advanced ADC harboring EGFR mutation can receive osimertinib, a third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), however, the use of TKIs in SCC remains controversial. In some published cases, osimertinib treatment led to success, in others, the therapy did not result in the expected final effect. Small sample groups and diverse molecular backgrounds indicate the need for further research in this field. Thus, the treatment decision-making process in those patients overall remains extremely demanding and ambiguous.     

Acquired Resistance to Third-Generation EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Patients With De Novo EGFRT790M-Mutant NSCLC

IntroductionEGFR^T790M mostly exists subclonally and is acquired as the most common mechanism of resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Nevertheless, because de novo EGFR^T790M-mutant NSCLC is rare, little is known on acquired resistance mechanisms to third-generation EGFR TKIs.MethodsAcquired resistance mechanisms were analyzed using tumor and plasma samples before and after third-generation EGFR TKI treatment in four patients with de novo EGFR^T790M-mutant NSCLC. Genetic alterations were analyzed by whole-exome sequencing, targeted sequencing, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and droplet digital PCR. MTOR^L1433S, confirmed for oncogenicity using the Ba/F3 system, was reproduced in H1975 cell lines using CRISPR/Cas9-RNP.ResultsOf seven patients with NSCLC with de novo EGFR^T790M/L858R mutation, four (LC1–4) who received third-generation EGFR TKIs acquired resistance after achieving a partial response (median = 27 mo, range: 17–48 mo). Novel MTOR^L1433S and EGFR^C797S/L798I mutations in cis, MET amplification, and EGFR^C797S mutation were identified as acquired resistance mechanisms to third-generation EGFR TKIs. The MTOR^L1433S mutation was oncogenic in Ba/F3 models and revealed resistance to osimertinib through AKT signaling activation in NCI-H1975 cells harboring the MTOR^L1433S mutation edited by CRISPR/Cas9 (half-maximal inhibitory concentration, 800 ± 67 nM). Osimertinib in combination with mTOR inhibitors abrogated acquired resistance to osimertinib.ConclusionsActivation of bypass pathways and the EGFR^C797S or EGFR^C797S/L798I mutation were identified as acquired resistance mechanisms to third-generation EGFR TKIs in patients with NSCLC with de novo EGFR^T790M mutation. In addition, MTOR^L1433S- and EGFR^L858R/T790M-mutant NSCLC cells were sensitive to osimertinib plus mTOR inhibitors.     

Isolated Brain Metastases as the First Relapse After the Curative Surgical Resection in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients With an EGFR Mutation

Introduction

The aim of this study was to clarify the incidence and disease behavior of brain metastases (BM) without extracranial disease (ie, isolated BM) as the first relapse after curative surgery in non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, analyzed according to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status.

EGFR Mutation Subtypes Influence Survival Outcomes following First-Line Gefitinib Therapy in Advanced Asian NSCLC Patients

IntroductionActivating mutations in the EGFR gene have been shown to confer sensitivity to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with advanced NSCLC. However, wide interpatient variability in treatment outcomes in response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in these patients remains unaccounted for. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of EGFR mutation types and subtypes on survival outcomes in advanced Asian patients with NSCLC receiving first-line gefitinib therapy.MethodsPatients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC who were harboring EGFR mutations, receiving first-line gefitinib treatment, and of Asian descent (N = 383) were evaluated. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards models were implemented to evaluate the differences in PFS and OS.ResultsSignificant differences in PFS were observed between patients carrying EGFR mutations in exons 18, 19, 20, and 21, with patients carrying EGFR exon 19 mutations having the longest median PFS (overall p = 8.88 × 10^-15). Comparison of PFS among the five different exon 19 mutation subtypes and among the two exon 19 deletion start codons did not reveal any significant differences. No significant difference was observed in OS among patients carrying EGFR mutations on different exons (overall p = 0.054); however, OS was found to be significantly different among the various subtypes of exon 19 mutations, with the 15–nucleotide deletion “non-ELREA” group having the shortest OS of 11.3 months (overall p = 0.025).ConclusionsEGFR mutation types and subtypes significantly influence survival outcomes in patients with advanced NSCLC who are receiving first-line gefitinib treatment.